31.10.2014 Views

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gateshead</strong> & <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> ‐ 2010<br />

1.3 Migration & Commuting Patterns<br />

1.3.1 The pattern of household movement between <strong>Newcastle</strong>, <strong>Gateshead</strong> <strong>and</strong> other authorities<br />

has been analysed by examining 2001 Census data, National Health Service Patient<br />

Registration data for the period 2002‐2008 <strong>and</strong> the primary data from the 2010 local<br />

<strong>Housing</strong> Surveys.<br />

1.3.2 The 2001 Census household migration data demonstrated a high level of self‐containment;<br />

84.4% in <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> 78.9% in <strong>Gateshead</strong>.<br />

1.3.3 In total, 93.9% of moves into <strong>and</strong> within <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> 93.4% into <strong>and</strong> within <strong>Gateshead</strong><br />

were from within the five authorities in the Tyne & Wear sub‐region.<br />

1.3.4 There were fairly low levels of movement to authorities at a greater distance. Crossboundary<br />

movement is therefore principally to an adjoining authority. The main outmigrating<br />

group is family forming <strong>and</strong> moving households in the 25‐44 age range with<br />

children.<br />

1.3.5 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net out‐migration from <strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne<br />

to North Tyneside (‐7,250 people) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> (‐3,800). Positive net levels of in‐migration<br />

were evident from Sunderl<strong>and</strong> (+1,180 people).<br />

1.3.6 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net in‐migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong> from<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne (+3,800 people). Negative net levels of out‐migration were evident to<br />

all other areas.<br />

1.4 The <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> <strong>Market</strong><br />

1.4.1 A housing market is normally one where 70% of moves take place within it.<br />

1.4.2 The chart below shows the level of self containment in relation to household movement <strong>and</strong><br />

commuting in each area<br />

Fig. 1‐1 Internal Movement & Commuting % (1999‐2000)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

84.9<br />

71.9<br />

78.9<br />

60<br />

56.9<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong><br />

Internal Migration<br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong><br />

Internal Commuting<br />

Source: Crown Copyright © Census 2001<br />

1.4.3 Although the evidence of household moves suggests that <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> could be<br />

considered to be a single market at 84.9% <strong>and</strong> 78.9% respectively. <strong>Gateshead</strong> has a much<br />

lower level of self‐ containment in relation to employment with 56.9% of residents working<br />

within the Borough.<br />

1.4.4 71.9% of <strong>Newcastle</strong> Upon Tyne residents work within the City. The Census data <strong>and</strong> 2010<br />

survey data for <strong>Gateshead</strong> shows very high levels of commuting to <strong>Newcastle</strong>.<br />

1.4.5 When household moves <strong>and</strong> travel to work patterns are considered together <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong> should be considered as part of the Tyne <strong>and</strong> Wear sub‐regional market.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!