Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gateshead</strong> & <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> ‐ 2010<br />
1.3 Migration & Commuting Patterns<br />
1.3.1 The pattern of household movement between <strong>Newcastle</strong>, <strong>Gateshead</strong> <strong>and</strong> other authorities<br />
has been analysed by examining 2001 Census data, National Health Service Patient<br />
Registration data for the period 2002‐2008 <strong>and</strong> the primary data from the 2010 local<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Surveys.<br />
1.3.2 The 2001 Census household migration data demonstrated a high level of self‐containment;<br />
84.4% in <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> 78.9% in <strong>Gateshead</strong>.<br />
1.3.3 In total, 93.9% of moves into <strong>and</strong> within <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> 93.4% into <strong>and</strong> within <strong>Gateshead</strong><br />
were from within the five authorities in the Tyne & Wear sub‐region.<br />
1.3.4 There were fairly low levels of movement to authorities at a greater distance. Crossboundary<br />
movement is therefore principally to an adjoining authority. The main outmigrating<br />
group is family forming <strong>and</strong> moving households in the 25‐44 age range with<br />
children.<br />
1.3.5 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net out‐migration from <strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne<br />
to North Tyneside (‐7,250 people) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> (‐3,800). Positive net levels of in‐migration<br />
were evident from Sunderl<strong>and</strong> (+1,180 people).<br />
1.3.6 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net in‐migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong> from<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne (+3,800 people). Negative net levels of out‐migration were evident to<br />
all other areas.<br />
1.4 The <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> <strong>Market</strong><br />
1.4.1 A housing market is normally one where 70% of moves take place within it.<br />
1.4.2 The chart below shows the level of self containment in relation to household movement <strong>and</strong><br />
commuting in each area<br />
Fig. 1‐1 Internal Movement & Commuting % (1999‐2000)<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
84.9<br />
71.9<br />
78.9<br />
60<br />
56.9<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong><br />
Internal Migration<br />
<strong>Gateshead</strong><br />
Internal Commuting<br />
Source: Crown Copyright © Census 2001<br />
1.4.3 Although the evidence of household moves suggests that <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> could be<br />
considered to be a single market at 84.9% <strong>and</strong> 78.9% respectively. <strong>Gateshead</strong> has a much<br />
lower level of self‐ containment in relation to employment with 56.9% of residents working<br />
within the Borough.<br />
1.4.4 71.9% of <strong>Newcastle</strong> Upon Tyne residents work within the City. The Census data <strong>and</strong> 2010<br />
survey data for <strong>Gateshead</strong> shows very high levels of commuting to <strong>Newcastle</strong>.<br />
1.4.5 When household moves <strong>and</strong> travel to work patterns are considered together <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Gateshead</strong> should be considered as part of the Tyne <strong>and</strong> Wear sub‐regional market.<br />
10