31.10.2014 Views

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gateshead</strong> & <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> ‐ 2010<br />

<strong>Market</strong> Stock Balance<br />

1.17.8 Although the study areas have broad similarities, there are variations between sub‐areas<br />

within each local authority area in terms of the types of property required to meet current<br />

<strong>and</strong> future dem<strong>and</strong> for market housing.<br />

1.17.9 However, treating housing stock balance as a Borough or City‐wide market issue would<br />

contradict the fundamental requirement to carry out sustainable development <strong>and</strong> create<br />

sustainable communities.<br />

1.17.10 Survey data showed that the most important factors which determine where households<br />

forming <strong>and</strong> existing households moving want to live are to be near their family, near work,<br />

where they have always lived <strong>and</strong> quality of the neighbourhood. These are the key elements<br />

of sustainable development <strong>and</strong> communities.<br />

1.17.11 It is important therefore that future delivery addresses local dem<strong>and</strong>, fills gaps in current<br />

stock types <strong>and</strong> assists in the creation of more sustainable communities. Providing for the<br />

growing older population is a key element for new delivery strategy, closely interlinked to<br />

the high level of under‐occupation.<br />

1.17.12 In providing a guideline for future market housing development in <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong>, consideration should be given to the scale of current family sized housing stock,<br />

demographic change, reducing household size <strong>and</strong> the levels <strong>and</strong> nature of in‐migration to<br />

support Growth Point <strong>and</strong> regeneration strategies.<br />

Table 1‐1<br />

Future <strong>Market</strong> Sector Delivery by Size<br />

Bedroom Size (%)<br />

Area 1‐Bed 2‐Bed 3‐ Bed 4‐ Bed +<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> /<br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong><br />

40 30 30<br />

1.17.13 It is recommended that to create a more balanced <strong>and</strong> higher quality housing stock in the<br />

area, future development proportions could be for delivery of 40% one or two bedrooms,<br />

but mainly two, <strong>and</strong> 60% equally apportioned between three <strong>and</strong> four bedrooms.<br />

1.18 Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Need <strong>and</strong> Supply<br />

1.18.1 The CLG Needs <strong>Assessment</strong> Model is used to calculate the annual shortfall of social housing<br />

units.<br />

Table 1‐2<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> /<br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong><br />

Annual Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Shortfall<br />

Affordable Need<br />

Re‐let / Re‐sale<br />

Supply<br />

Affordable<br />

Shortfall<br />

3,978 3,805 173<br />

1.18.2 Before any new unit delivery, there is a need for affordable housing of 173 units in excess of<br />

supply levels from stock turnover totalling 3,805 units each year across the <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Gateshead</strong> area.<br />

Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>and</strong> Tenure Mix Targets<br />

1.18.3 Based on the robust evidence found in this assessment, the Local Development Framework<br />

could consider an affordable housing target of 15% across the area, subject to viability.<br />

1.18.4 The final target level will be assessed through a separate viability assessment study.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!