Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Gateshead and Newcastle Strategic Housing Market Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gateshead</strong> & <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 2010<br />
3.5.22 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net out‐migration from <strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne<br />
to North Tyneside (‐ 7,250 people) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong> (‐ 3,800). Positive net levels of inmigration<br />
were evident from Sunderl<strong>and</strong> (+1,180 people).<br />
Fig. 3‐2 Net –Migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong> (June 2002‐June 2008)<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3,800<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
‐1000<br />
‐2000<br />
South Tyneside<br />
Sunderl<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong><br />
North Tyneside<br />
Durham<br />
Easington<br />
Chester Le Street<br />
Derwentside<br />
Blyth Valley<br />
Castle Morpeth<br />
Wansbeck<br />
Alnwick<br />
Tynedale<br />
‐3000<br />
‐4000<br />
‐140 ‐90 ‐480 ‐10 ‐100<br />
‐500 ‐1,790 ‐40 ‐120 ‐110 ‐130 ‐480<br />
‐5000<br />
Source: ONS National Health Service Central Register (June 2002 to June 2008)<br />
3.5.23 The NHS data shows an extremely high level of net in‐migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong> from<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong> Upon Tyne (‐+3,800 people). Negative net levels of out‐migration were evident to<br />
all other areas.<br />
3.5.24 The following table shows how combined net out‐migration from <strong>Newcastle</strong> to North<br />
Tyneside (‐1,000 p.a.), <strong>Gateshead</strong> (‐600 p.a.) <strong>and</strong> Northumberl<strong>and</strong> (‐600 p.a.) exceeds total<br />
internal out‐migration (‐1,400 p.a.) <strong>and</strong> furthermore how net losses of the key familyforming<br />
age group <strong>and</strong> of children contribute the majority of local net out‐migration (fourfifths<br />
of net out‐migration to Northumberl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> two‐thirds of that to North Tyneside <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>Gateshead</strong>).<br />
3.5.25 NHCSR data from mid‐2004 to mid‐2009 shows that the majority of local net out‐migration<br />
(four‐fifths of net out‐migration to Northumberl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> two‐thirds of that to North Tyneside<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Gateshead</strong>) are net losses of the key family‐forming age groups <strong>and</strong> of children.<br />
3.5.26 Net out‐migration of children accounts for 25% of net out‐migration to Northumberl<strong>and</strong>,<br />
11% of that to North Tyneside <strong>and</strong> only 5% of out‐migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong>. This suggests<br />
that moves from <strong>Newcastle</strong> to <strong>Gateshead</strong> are mostly of childless single people <strong>and</strong> couples<br />
(presumably attracted by greater affordability of accommodation) <strong>and</strong> moves to<br />
Northumberl<strong>and</strong> are more associated with a more competitive family housing offer.<br />
3.5.27 Net out‐migration of children accounts for 25% of net out‐migration to Northumberl<strong>and</strong>,<br />
11% of that to North Tyneside <strong>and</strong> only 5% of out‐migration to <strong>Gateshead</strong>. This suggests<br />
that moves to <strong>Gateshead</strong> are mostly of childless single people <strong>and</strong> couples (presumably<br />
attracted by greater affordability of accommodation) <strong>and</strong> moves to Northumberl<strong>and</strong> are<br />
more associated with a more competitive family housing offer.<br />
42