Primary Education Survey Evaluation Report Somalia - Somali - JNA
Primary Education Survey Evaluation Report Somalia - Somali - JNA
Primary Education Survey Evaluation Report Somalia - Somali - JNA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PES <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, 2008<br />
5 Data Duplication<br />
5.1 Findings and Analysis<br />
In the effectiveness section of this evaluation report the view is expressed that an EMIS unit should be<br />
established that has the vision of being a service unit for other directorates within the ministry and other<br />
stakeholders that support the education of children. This provision of data and the associated reports need<br />
to be provided on a timely basis. A result of not providing reports on a timely basis is the duplication of<br />
the data collection process. If data collection needs are not well coordinated, parallel systems are at times<br />
set up to gather additional data.<br />
Evidence was found of quite extensive data collection and data entry that is not part of the PES process.<br />
Some examples are listed below.<br />
In one zone UNICEF entered a subset of PES data into an excel spreadsheet due the tardiness of the PES<br />
report being provided. The data entered allowed them to assess progress and distribute resources on an<br />
equitable basis.<br />
In another Zone REOs reported that they all had their own data collection systems. One set of documents<br />
provided indicated that School enrolment by grade/gender/district/school, drop outs, school furniture and<br />
equipment health hazards, general condition of school, number of text book per student, extra curricular<br />
activities and other data are systematically collected. Some of this is collated into a regional report. While<br />
all REOs indicated they collect data independently of PES it is not clear just how extensive each set of<br />
data is.<br />
In Puntland the curriculum division collects reports on a monthly basis from rural schools and conducts<br />
some analysis of the data. Mentors are used as collection agents. These include student enrolment figures<br />
and observations of the mentoring process. Some may have reservations with regard to this process as<br />
mentors are intended to have a professional development role, rather than an enumerator role. If such a<br />
process were to continue, it would have to be made explicit how the data collected related to their<br />
professional development function<br />
In this same zone a set of data for Grade 8 examination results is collected and collated. This data<br />
consisted of full details (including date of birth) of every student undertaking the examination. To this<br />
data base the exam results are added when available. This is an example of data being required to<br />
supplement that of the PES. The PES does not gather student names and details as records. As EMIS units<br />
develop it will be necessary to integrate these functions into its annual work plan.<br />
Much of the content of this section supports the observations and recommendations made in the previous<br />
section on the timeliness of the PES and indicates how the current structure and operational mechanisms<br />
are resulting in duplication of effort and a resulting wasting of resources.<br />
However, there are some positive aspects to these observations. There is an indication of capacity to<br />
communicate with schools and to transfer forms within a rudimentary monitoring system emerging.<br />
There is also an indication of an emerging understanding of the important role of data in planning and an<br />
emergent capacity to process and analyse data. These efforts need to be recognised and encouraged to<br />
facilitate the growth of formal quality assurance procedures to replace the relatively ad hoc systems<br />
currently being used.<br />
5.2 Recommendation<br />
a. That careful planning take place to provide data on a timely basis for the variety of MoE<br />
directorates and stakeholders<br />
22