Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page
Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page
Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Competitiveness analysis of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g media sector<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> report
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> report<br />
This report was written by<br />
Pira International, as a project<br />
co-managed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong> & UK<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media, an alliance of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Newspaper Society, The<br />
Newspaper Publishers Association,<br />
The Periodical Publishers Association<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Publishers Association.<br />
The executive summary is available<br />
on-l<strong>in</strong>e at www.uk-publish<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>in</strong>fo and<br />
at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/services/<br />
content<strong>in</strong>dustry/pr<strong>in</strong>t_publish<strong>in</strong>g_and_<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation_<strong>in</strong>dustries.shtml<br />
© Crown Copyright 2002
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Contents<br />
Preface<br />
Part 1 The <strong>in</strong>dustry today 1<br />
Chapter 1 Introduction 2<br />
1.1 What is publish<strong>in</strong>g? 2<br />
1.1.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 2<br />
1.2.2 Newspapers 3<br />
1.2 How big is <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry? 3<br />
Chapter 2 Concepts of competitiveness 6<br />
2.1 Introduction 6<br />
2.2 Sector competitiveness as a concept 6<br />
2.3 The competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g –<br />
conceptual issues 6<br />
2.3.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition 6<br />
2.3.2 Comparisons 7<br />
2.4 Alternative approaches to measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
competitiveness 7<br />
2.5 Dual product markets 7<br />
Chapter 3 Drivers of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry 10<br />
3.1 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers 10<br />
3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends 10<br />
3.2.1 The share of publish<strong>in</strong>g 10<br />
3.2.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g by type 13<br />
3.2.3 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g forecast 13<br />
3.3 Consumer expenditure of money and time 13<br />
3.3.1 Money 13<br />
3.3.2 Personal spend<strong>in</strong>g and shopp<strong>in</strong>g trends 15<br />
3.4 Time 15<br />
3.5 Demographic changes 17<br />
3.6 O<strong>the</strong>r factors affect<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g 18<br />
3.6.1 Internet connectivity 18<br />
3.6.2 Reduc<strong>in</strong>g wastage 20<br />
Chapter 4 Size and performance of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry 22<br />
4.1 Turnover 22<br />
4.1.1 Revenues from licens<strong>in</strong>g and rights sales 22<br />
4.2 Costs and resources 24<br />
4.2.1 Paper prices 24<br />
4.3 Cross <strong>in</strong>dustry comparison 26<br />
4.4 International comparisons of productivity<br />
and <strong>in</strong>novation 28<br />
4.5 Conclusion 29<br />
iv<br />
Chapter 5 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g 30<br />
5.1 Revenues 30<br />
5.2 Export performance 30<br />
5.3 Titles 30<br />
5.4 Prices 33<br />
5.5 Profitability 33<br />
5.6 Employment, skills and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 33<br />
5.7 International comparisons 35<br />
Chapter 6 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g 36<br />
6.1 Revenues and costs 36<br />
6.2 Prices 37<br />
Chapter 7 Newspapers 38<br />
7.1 Revenue trends 38<br />
7.2 Circulation and cover prices 38<br />
7.3 Number of titles 38<br />
7.4 Employment and related issues 41<br />
7.5 Skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 42<br />
7.6 Productivity and costs 43<br />
7.7 International comparisons 44<br />
Chapter 8 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 46<br />
8.1 Activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector 46<br />
8.2 Revenues 46<br />
8.3 Copy sales and cover prices 46<br />
8.4 Titles and launches 48<br />
8.5 Returns and wastage 49<br />
8.6 Sales channels 49<br />
8.7 Brand extension 49<br />
8.8 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g 50<br />
8.9 Pan-magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector data 50<br />
8.9.1 Skill levels and skill shortages 50<br />
8.9.2 Profitability 51<br />
8.9.3 International comparisons 51<br />
Chapter 9 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media 54<br />
9.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 54<br />
9.1.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 54<br />
9.1.2 Number of titles 54<br />
9.1.3 Circulation 54<br />
9.1.4 Diversification of revenues 54<br />
9.2 Directories 57<br />
9.2.1 Nature of directories 57<br />
9.3 Newsletters and reports 59<br />
9.4 Onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM <strong>in</strong>formation vendors 60<br />
i
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Contents<br />
Chapter 10 The Internet 62<br />
10.1 Opportunities and threats 62<br />
10.2 Newspapers 62<br />
10.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es 62<br />
10.4 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 63<br />
10.5 Books 64<br />
Chapter 11 Analysis of gaps <strong>in</strong><br />
data sources 66<br />
11.1 General comments 66<br />
11.2 Official versus unofficial statistics 66<br />
11.3 Sub-sectors 66<br />
11.3.1 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />
11.3.2 Newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />
11.3.3 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />
11.3.4 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g 67<br />
11.3.5 Database and directory publish<strong>in</strong>g 67<br />
11.3.6 Newsletters 67<br />
11.4 Summary of def<strong>in</strong>itional issues and data gaps 68<br />
Chapter 12 Typology of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
products accord<strong>in</strong>g to brand and<br />
format characteristics 70<br />
12.1 Brand 70<br />
12.2 Importance of format 70<br />
12.3 Consumer media 70<br />
12.4 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess media 71<br />
12.5 Education and research market 71<br />
Chapter 13 Strengths, weaknesses,<br />
opportunities and threats 72<br />
13.1 Introduction 72<br />
13.2 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> – common strengths and issues 72<br />
13.3 Books 74<br />
13.4 Journals 76<br />
13.5 Newspapers 78<br />
13.6 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess media and<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation 80<br />
Chapter 14 Future scenarios 82<br />
14.1 Introduction 82<br />
14.2 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios 82<br />
14.2.1 Lifestyle 82<br />
14.2.2 Work 82<br />
14.2.3 Technology 82<br />
14.2.4 <strong>Economy</strong> 82<br />
14.3 The chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy scenarios 83<br />
14.3.1 Slow adaptation to a slowly develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy 83<br />
14.3.2 The fast pace of <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy catches publishers unaware 84<br />
14.3.3 Careful transition of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy 85<br />
14.4 Scenario conclusion 85<br />
ii
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Part 2 Issues for competitiveness 87<br />
Chapter 15 The challenge of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able growth 88<br />
15.1 Introduction 88<br />
15.2 Take <strong>the</strong> wrapper off 88<br />
15.3 Can <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g iIndustry compete<br />
on a global scale? 89<br />
15.3.1 Strengths and opportunities 89<br />
15.3.2 Challenges 91<br />
15.4 The skills to compete 93<br />
15.4.1 Strengths and opportunities 94<br />
15.4.2 Challenges 94<br />
15.5 Industry profile 95<br />
15.5.1 Strengths and opportunities 95<br />
15.5.2 Challenges 96<br />
15.6 Industry statistics 97<br />
15.7 Technology adoption 97<br />
15.7.1 Strengths and opportunities 97<br />
15.7.2 Challenges 98<br />
Chapter 16 The challenge of changes<br />
<strong>in</strong> customer behaviour 100<br />
16.1 Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
end customer 101<br />
16.1.1 Strengths and opportunities 101<br />
16.1.2 Challenges 101<br />
16.2 Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser more effectively 102<br />
16.3 Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance of<br />
revenue streams 103<br />
16.3.1 Strengths and opportunities 104<br />
16.3.2 Challenges 104<br />
16.4 Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to<br />
<strong>the</strong> customer 106<br />
16.4.1 Strengths and opportunities 106<br />
16.4.2 Challenges 106<br />
16.4.3 Supermarkets and super news retailers 109<br />
16.4.4 Postal services 109<br />
16.4.5 Conclusions and actions 109<br />
Chapter 17 The challenge of<br />
digital media 112<br />
17.1 Strengths and opportunities 112<br />
17.2 Challenges 112<br />
17.2.1 The chang<strong>in</strong>g competitive landscape 112<br />
17.2.2 Competition from publicly funded bodies 114<br />
17.2.3 Copyright protection 115<br />
17.2.4 Standards 116<br />
17.2.5 Journal archiv<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />
17.2.6 Gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />
17.2.7 Taxation 117<br />
17.2.8 Regulation of digital content 117<br />
17.2.9 Caution on new platforms 117<br />
Chapter 18 The conclusions and<br />
proposed action plan 120<br />
18.1 Conclusions 120<br />
18.2 Proposed action plan 120<br />
18.2.1 Essential actions 121<br />
18.2.2 Necessary actions 123<br />
18.2.3 Desirable actions 124<br />
Appendices 125<br />
A Methodology 126<br />
B Participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study 128<br />
C Text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire 130<br />
D Ma<strong>in</strong> sources consulted 142<br />
iii
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Preface<br />
This report and Action Plan has been commissioned by <strong>the</strong> Department of Trade and Industry (<strong>DTI</strong>)<br />
as part of a series of <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> competitive performance and <strong>the</strong> factors promot<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
imped<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness <strong>in</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors. This project has been co-managed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong><br />
and UK <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media (UKPM), an alliance of <strong>the</strong> Newspaper Society (NS), <strong>the</strong> Newspaper<br />
Publishers Association (NPA), The Periodical Publishers Association (PPA) and <strong>the</strong> Publishers<br />
Association (PA).<br />
The scope of <strong>the</strong> project has been wide rang<strong>in</strong>g, cover<strong>in</strong>g books, national and regional<br />
newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es, journals, newsletters, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, directory and database<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g and Internet publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
A description of <strong>the</strong> methodology used; details of <strong>the</strong> many companies and organisations who<br />
assisted us by fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> questionnaires and attend<strong>in</strong>g workshops; data sources consulted and <strong>the</strong><br />
text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire are conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendices to <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
A separate Executive Summary for this report is available.<br />
iv
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
PART1<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
1
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
PART11<br />
Introduction<br />
1.1 What is publish<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
Historically, publish<strong>in</strong>g has been <strong>in</strong>extricably<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> production of pr<strong>in</strong>ted material,<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of books, scholarly journals,<br />
newspapers or magaz<strong>in</strong>es. As we shall argue<br />
throughout this report, while <strong>the</strong>re is no sign of<br />
<strong>the</strong> disappearance of pr<strong>in</strong>t as a medium, it is no<br />
longer helpful to conceive of publish<strong>in</strong>g solely <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se terms. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, publish<strong>in</strong>g is a set of<br />
skills and core competences consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />
acquisition, selection, edit<strong>in</strong>g, management,<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g and sale of content. The ‘wrapper’,<br />
or more likely ‘wrappers’, <strong>in</strong> which this content<br />
reaches its f<strong>in</strong>al user is not <strong>the</strong> crucial factor.<br />
What is crucial for publishers is that <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
able to evolve <strong>the</strong>ir skill sets and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> user <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to rema<strong>in</strong> strong and vibrant.<br />
1.1.1 A global bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
Thanks to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational use of English, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
has always been an important <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
dimension to <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s<br />
activity, especially <strong>in</strong> book and journal<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g. This use of English is spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />
beyond <strong>the</strong> traditional English speak<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />
of <strong>the</strong> world as English becomes <strong>the</strong> preferred<br />
second language <strong>in</strong> many countries. This is<br />
creat<strong>in</strong>g new opportunities for UK publishers.<br />
There are also challenges here <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
competition with <strong>the</strong> US <strong>in</strong> Third World<br />
countries, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of<br />
penetrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> US market.<br />
Both <strong>in</strong>ternational competition, and <strong>the</strong> need<br />
to deliver content <strong>in</strong> whatever form and via<br />
whatever channel <strong>the</strong> customer wants, push<br />
publishers towards greater scale <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
operations. At <strong>the</strong> same time, it is important that<br />
smaller publishers – which are often <strong>the</strong> source<br />
of <strong>in</strong>novation – are still able to secure footholds<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marketplace.<br />
The UK has not produced a player of global<br />
Table note This list is not <strong>in</strong>tended to be<br />
comprehensive. Some companies are foreign-owned,<br />
but have significant economic activity with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
Table 1 Lead<strong>in</strong>g UK publish<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
BBC Worldwide<br />
Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
EMAP<br />
Haymarket<br />
IPC<br />
John Brown<br />
National Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information<br />
Redwood<br />
United Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Media<br />
Newspapers<br />
Daily Mail and General Trust (Associated<br />
Newspapers and Northcliffe)<br />
Guardian Media Group<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times (Pearson)<br />
Johnston Press<br />
News International<br />
Newsquest<br />
Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror<br />
The Telegraph (Holl<strong>in</strong>ger)<br />
Books and journals<br />
BBC Worldwide<br />
Blackwell Science<br />
Bloomsbury<br />
Cambridge University Press<br />
Dorl<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>dersley (Pearson)<br />
Faber & Faber<br />
HarperColl<strong>in</strong>s (News International)<br />
Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e (WH Smith)<br />
Little, Brown (AOL/Time Warner)<br />
John Murray<br />
Macmillan (Holtzbr<strong>in</strong>ck)<br />
Orion (Hachette)<br />
Oxford University Press<br />
Pengu<strong>in</strong> (Pearson)<br />
Random House (Bertelsmann)<br />
Reed Elsevier<br />
Scholastic<br />
Taylor and Francis<br />
Transworld (Bertelsmann)<br />
John Wiley<br />
Source Pira International<br />
2 © Pira International Ltd
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
scale <strong>in</strong> consumer publish<strong>in</strong>g, along <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es of<br />
Germany’s Bertelsmann. But it has been able to<br />
produce companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of academic,<br />
educational and bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g that are<br />
world leaders, such as Reed Elsevier and<br />
Pearson.<br />
Reuters is also a truly global player, both <strong>in</strong> its<br />
traditional news agency role and <strong>in</strong> its much<br />
larger f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation bus<strong>in</strong>esses, as<br />
well as its bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation ventures. In its<br />
<strong>in</strong>novative conjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of technology and content,<br />
and its development of new skills <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g, it may prefigure much of <strong>the</strong> future of<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
1.1.2 Social, political and cultural issues<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is not simply a bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Its products<br />
are hugely <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> education system<br />
and <strong>the</strong> social, cultural and political life of <strong>the</strong><br />
UK. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficult decisions that<br />
face governments and regulators <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
taxation, concentration of ownership, regulation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> nature of published content (privacy,<br />
obscenity, libel), and <strong>the</strong> degree to which<br />
publishers are allowed to make use of personal<br />
data. This latter po<strong>in</strong>t is particularly important <strong>in</strong><br />
be<strong>in</strong>g able to tailor products and services to <strong>the</strong><br />
user, and also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued availability of<br />
some products such as directories. Digital<br />
technologies also pose important challenges to<br />
<strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g copyright regime. There is a need to<br />
reconcile <strong>the</strong> necessary reward to <strong>the</strong> creators<br />
of knowledge and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment with <strong>the</strong> need<br />
for society to have access to <strong>the</strong>se products <strong>in</strong><br />
ways that are not over restrictive or that exclude<br />
whole sections of society.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />
economy is a major source of demand for <strong>the</strong><br />
products and services of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
and a source of supply for academic, STM and<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviour of consumers pose<br />
particular challenges to <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
The consumer appears to be devot<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
money, but less time, to many of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
products of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, as media<br />
and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment choices proliferate.<br />
Demographic change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of an age<strong>in</strong>g<br />
population may favour some products <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
short term, but <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> longer term may pose<br />
a threat to read<strong>in</strong>g as a leisure pursuit.<br />
The shift<strong>in</strong>g pattern of shopp<strong>in</strong>g activity also<br />
poses problems for <strong>the</strong> distribution of physical<br />
newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, potentially<br />
weaken<strong>in</strong>g newspaper buy<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r and<br />
narrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> range of magaz<strong>in</strong>es on offer.<br />
1.2 How big is <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry?<br />
Because of <strong>the</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g boundaries of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, it is not straightforward to answer<br />
this question. There are, <strong>in</strong> fact, a number of<br />
different answers, based on <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
used <strong>in</strong> official statistics and unofficial ones.<br />
This problem will be discussed <strong>in</strong> more detail<br />
<strong>in</strong> Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report. This section will conf<strong>in</strong>e<br />
itself to a brief overview and some illustrative<br />
comparisons.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> official Standard Industrial<br />
Classification, publish<strong>in</strong>g activity is covered by<br />
SIC 22.1 and total turnover for that classification<br />
for <strong>the</strong> latest available year, 2000, is £18.37bn.<br />
This appears to understate some of <strong>the</strong> faster<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, particularly<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and excludes activities such as<br />
exhibitions and conferences, databases, news<br />
agencies and ‘advertis<strong>in</strong>g-related activities’ by<br />
plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIC.<br />
The DCMS report Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Creative<br />
Industries produced a size for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry of<br />
about £18.5bn <strong>in</strong> 1999. Tak<strong>in</strong>g some unofficial<br />
data for net revenues for newspapers and<br />
conventional consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es and sales of<br />
books and add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> revenues from customer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities<br />
(drawn from <strong>the</strong> special study Connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess) gives a total turnover of just over<br />
£22bn <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
It would be fair to say that <strong>the</strong> datasets for<br />
which <strong>the</strong>re are time series all record a picture<br />
of healthy growth. Series cover<strong>in</strong>g particular<br />
sectors will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 2.<br />
Compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> smallest of <strong>the</strong> turnover<br />
estimates of £18.37bn with o<strong>the</strong>r UK ><br />
3
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of turnover,<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g is bigger than <strong>the</strong> manufacture of<br />
pharmaceuticals (SIC 24.4) with a turnover of<br />
£12.03bn. In terms of employment, aga<strong>in</strong><br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to official figures, publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
employed 164,000 people <strong>in</strong> 2000, while<br />
pharmaceuticals employed 65,000. Its turnover<br />
is almost half <strong>the</strong> size of that of<br />
telecommunications (SIC 64.2), which had<br />
a turnover <strong>in</strong> 2000 of £42bn and employed<br />
234,000. Clearly, if <strong>the</strong> larger estimates for<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g are correct, and we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />
official figures do understate both turnover and<br />
employment, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> comparisons are even<br />
more startl<strong>in</strong>g. Startl<strong>in</strong>g, because although <strong>the</strong><br />
products of publish<strong>in</strong>g are all around us every<br />
day, as an <strong>in</strong>dustry it does not have <strong>the</strong> profile<br />
its size would justify.<br />
4
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
2<br />
Concepts of competitiveness<br />
2.1 Introduction<br />
This section of <strong>the</strong> report will try to pa<strong>in</strong>t a<br />
picture of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as it currently is,<br />
assess<strong>in</strong>g its performance us<strong>in</strong>g a set of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicators for <strong>the</strong> sector as a whole and its<br />
constituent parts. It will beg<strong>in</strong> by discuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
conceptual and practical issues we encountered<br />
<strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators and attempt<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
source data to match <strong>the</strong>m. Then, we discuss<br />
and illustrate drivers for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends, consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and time use, and demographics. We go on to<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>e some cross-<strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
comparisons, followed by a discussion of<br />
selected f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at <strong>the</strong> level of publish<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n at sub-sector level. There is <strong>the</strong>n a<br />
discussion of <strong>the</strong> response of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry to <strong>the</strong> Internet, which is followed by<br />
a section summaris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> areas where data<br />
is unavailable or unreliable.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quantitative analysis, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
a section describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> strengths and<br />
weaknesses, opportunities and threats fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. This is based on desk research<br />
and on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>in</strong>dicators, as well as<br />
<strong>the</strong> questionnaire responses, <strong>in</strong>terviews and<br />
focus groups held dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong><br />
project. F<strong>in</strong>ally, this section discusses scenarios<br />
fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
2.2 Sector competitiveness as a concept<br />
Competitiveness is about <strong>the</strong> extent to which<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dividual firm, or national <strong>in</strong>dustry, can<br />
survive and susta<strong>in</strong> itself, and <strong>the</strong> agility with<br />
which it can respond to opportunities and<br />
threats. A firm’s competitive advantage can lie <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> ability to produce at low cost; <strong>in</strong> proprietary<br />
assets; <strong>in</strong> a high rate of <strong>in</strong>novation; <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
high quality well differentiated products, and so<br />
on. This depends on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> which it is<br />
engaged, <strong>the</strong> stability of technology, barriers to<br />
entry, <strong>the</strong> rate of entry and exit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />
and so forth.<br />
Sectoral competitiveness analysis throws up<br />
some methodology issues. While it is fairly<br />
straightforward to understand what is meant by<br />
<strong>the</strong> competitiveness of an <strong>in</strong>dividual company,<br />
<strong>the</strong> notion of <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of an entire<br />
sector is more problematic. In <strong>the</strong> first place,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of a sector,<br />
which is rarely clear cut. In <strong>the</strong> second place,<br />
with<strong>in</strong> any sector <strong>the</strong>re will be some companies<br />
that are extremely competitive and o<strong>the</strong>rs that<br />
are fail<strong>in</strong>g. In terms of def<strong>in</strong>ition, sectors are<br />
bound to be blurred at <strong>the</strong> edges. It may well be<br />
that with<strong>in</strong> a broad sector, <strong>the</strong>re are a number<br />
of identifiable sub-sectors, some of which are<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g and healthy, o<strong>the</strong>rs of which are<br />
decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Activity may be migrat<strong>in</strong>g away from<br />
some sub-sectors <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>rs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector,<br />
or <strong>in</strong>to an adjacent sector.<br />
The economy is <strong>in</strong> constant flux, and it is<br />
po<strong>in</strong>tless to be too obsessed with def<strong>in</strong>itions.<br />
The competitiveness analysis must aim to<br />
capture this movement and <strong>the</strong> common issues<br />
and problems for <strong>the</strong> sector. Competitiveness is<br />
also a comparative concept by its very nature.<br />
This raises <strong>the</strong> issue what should publish<strong>in</strong>g’s<br />
performance be compared to – o<strong>the</strong>r sectors<br />
of <strong>the</strong> UK economy, <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
competitors or both?<br />
2.3 The competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– conceptual issues<br />
Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
particularly prone to <strong>the</strong> problems outl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
above, firstly of def<strong>in</strong>ition, secondly of<br />
comparison, and f<strong>in</strong>ally of data availability<br />
(which is related to <strong>the</strong> first two).<br />
2.3.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has historically been l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong><br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process of pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. The two<br />
activities have become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly decoupled<br />
<strong>in</strong> recent years, even more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
rest of Europe, but <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kage has left a legacy<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed statistics. Secondly, <strong>the</strong> activities<br />
of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies – especially <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
and most important ones – have <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
come to span <strong>the</strong> whole gamut of pr<strong>in</strong>t products,<br />
and have expanded beyond pr<strong>in</strong>t on paper to<br />
electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g, conferences and<br />
exhibitions, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and audio-visual media. But<br />
this shift is not reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way that <strong>the</strong><br />
6
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
statistics are collected, which still tends to be<br />
conf<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> old divisions of books,<br />
newspapers and periodicals. This division is<br />
adhered to by official bodies, such as <strong>the</strong> Office<br />
of National Statistics and Eurostat. These<br />
bodies <strong>in</strong>evitably lag beh<strong>in</strong>d developments <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> economy by some years because of <strong>the</strong><br />
need to ga<strong>in</strong> broad agreement on <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />
trade classifications – <strong>the</strong>se aren’t lightly<br />
changed because of <strong>the</strong> importance of<br />
comparison over time and between countries.<br />
These problems are exacerbated <strong>in</strong> a sector like<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g where <strong>the</strong> speed and extent of<br />
change has been significant <strong>in</strong> recent years.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry itself has also largely<br />
collected statistics on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
divisions. Of course, it may be argued that any<br />
system of collection must be product focused<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than company focused, s<strong>in</strong>ce a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
company can produce a wide range of products<br />
across many <strong>in</strong>dustries. The difficulty <strong>in</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g is that <strong>the</strong> core asset – content – can<br />
be manifested <strong>in</strong> a range of forms. It may be <strong>the</strong><br />
identical content, but it may have added-value<br />
features – for example <strong>in</strong> its electronic form it<br />
may be searchable or it may be possible to<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrate it <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> customer’s own computer<br />
system. It may be complementary content, for<br />
example many newspaper websites differ from<br />
<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted edition of <strong>the</strong> paper. The current data<br />
collection process does not really capture that<br />
dynamic <strong>in</strong> any way.<br />
2.3.2 Comparisons<br />
Some sectors are highly exposed to<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational competition through trade, while<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs are, for various reasons, largely<br />
protected. In <strong>the</strong> case of much of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sector this protection is due to language and<br />
cultural barriers to <strong>the</strong> import of published goods<br />
from elsewhere, as well as to <strong>the</strong> physical<br />
problems of distribut<strong>in</strong>g time-critical products,<br />
such as newspapers, across large distances.<br />
While <strong>the</strong> Internet has exposed some products,<br />
for example <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times, to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
competition <strong>in</strong> its home market, <strong>the</strong> effect is still<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al to <strong>the</strong> newspaper sector as a whole.<br />
Book publish<strong>in</strong>g is a sector where <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
trade is important but, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly, it is difficult<br />
to measure its performance solely by means of<br />
<strong>the</strong> trade balance. This is because <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
is becom<strong>in</strong>g more globalised: as well as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exported, books are licensed to local publishers,<br />
or produced overseas by <strong>the</strong> company itself or<br />
sent electronically to be pr<strong>in</strong>ted on demand <strong>in</strong><br />
local markets. The revenue from <strong>the</strong>se activities<br />
is treated <strong>in</strong> different ways by different<br />
publishers, but generally <strong>the</strong> results are opaque<br />
to <strong>the</strong> outside observer.<br />
2.4 Alternative approaches to measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
competitiveness<br />
If products are <strong>in</strong>ternationally traded, <strong>the</strong>n<br />
clearly <strong>the</strong> trade balance is one way of<br />
measur<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness. In <strong>the</strong> absence of<br />
this, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> approach taken was to attempt to<br />
measure <strong>the</strong> efficiency with which companies<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a sector use <strong>in</strong>puts, or its productivity, <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r words. This is because <strong>the</strong> sector’s<br />
outputs form <strong>in</strong>puts to <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> economy<br />
and <strong>the</strong>refore its efficiency or o<strong>the</strong>rwise is a<br />
benefit or a cost to o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />
A sector’s output may form part of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure of an economy, which also has a<br />
major impact on o<strong>the</strong>r economic activity. In <strong>the</strong><br />
case of publish<strong>in</strong>g, its outputs are part of <strong>the</strong><br />
cultural and political life of <strong>the</strong> country as well as<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts to o<strong>the</strong>r economic activity. For some<br />
sectors, <strong>the</strong> price of output is <strong>the</strong> key variable of<br />
concern (as an <strong>in</strong>put to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors). For<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g, price is important (for example<br />
books and newspapers need to be with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
reach of <strong>the</strong> mass of people, and <strong>the</strong> price of<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation is significant for company<br />
competitiveness), but variety, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />
quality are also extremely important. In addition,<br />
we must try to benchmark a sector’s<br />
performance aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> performance of<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g sectors <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />
2.5 Dual product markets<br />
Many publish<strong>in</strong>g products (newspapers,<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, some directories and newsletters,<br />
much electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g, exhibitions and ><br />
7
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
some events and conferences) operate <strong>in</strong> dual<br />
product markets, where <strong>the</strong> publisher sells a<br />
product to an end-user (whe<strong>the</strong>r consumer or<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess) but also sells <strong>the</strong> attention of that<br />
end-user to an advertiser. For <strong>the</strong>se publishers,<br />
<strong>the</strong> growth and distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
expenditure is critical, as well as <strong>the</strong> growth and<br />
distribution of consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g and trends<br />
<strong>in</strong> revenue growth and profitability for <strong>the</strong><br />
corporate sector. The competitiveness of large<br />
parts of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is certa<strong>in</strong>ly substantially<br />
self-def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms of its ability to attract<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue. Hence <strong>the</strong> importance<br />
accorded to advertis<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
8
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
3<br />
Drivers of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
3.1 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers<br />
There are two major drivers for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
market: advertis<strong>in</strong>g and consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Clearly <strong>the</strong>re is a well-established relationship<br />
between <strong>the</strong>se and <strong>the</strong> economic cycle.<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g tends to expand as a proportion of<br />
gross value-added dur<strong>in</strong>g periods of boom and<br />
contract as a proportion <strong>in</strong> times of recession.<br />
Corporate revenue and profitability is a driver of<br />
both advertis<strong>in</strong>g and of purchases of bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es and<br />
directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, and spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on conferences and exhibitions. As profits can<br />
take some time to recover from recessions, this<br />
impacts on <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of publish<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />
recovery. Consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g is obviously<br />
related both to measurable factors, such as<br />
economic growth and employment levels, and<br />
to ‘consumer confidence’, which can be<br />
enhanced or damaged by many o<strong>the</strong>r factors.<br />
As well as cyclical factors, <strong>the</strong> share of both<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that will be achieved by <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
are also subject to more structural changes.<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> competes with o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles for<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g, from television to bus shelters, at<br />
least <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> attention of viewers/<br />
readers. Advertisers may perceive that different<br />
forms of advertis<strong>in</strong>g are more cost-effective,<br />
and switch to those. Consumer use of media<br />
products is affected by <strong>the</strong> time at <strong>the</strong>ir disposal<br />
as well as <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>comes, and <strong>the</strong> proliferation of<br />
demands on <strong>the</strong>ir time and money is an issue<br />
that will recur <strong>in</strong> this report. As media is a<br />
discretionary purchase, fashion and<br />
generational change are also crucial. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
to bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g and bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
is also constantly faced with opportunities and<br />
threats aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g fortunes of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries it serves, <strong>the</strong> latest example be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
headlong expansion of telecommunications and<br />
<strong>the</strong> subsequent ‘correction’.<br />
Time spent on media use will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report. Drivers of particular subsectors,<br />
such as education spend<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.<br />
textbooks and journals), will also be exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of discussion of issues affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>se sub-sectors.<br />
3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />
The charts opposite depict <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong><br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980, first <strong>in</strong><br />
constant 1995 prices (Figure 3.1) and <strong>the</strong>n as<br />
a percentage of gross value-added (Figure 3.2).<br />
They clearly show <strong>the</strong> broad upward trend <strong>in</strong><br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g, both absolutely and as a proportion of<br />
GVA, broken only by <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> recession<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s. Indications for 2001 will be<br />
discussed separately.<br />
3.2.1 The share of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> press (i.e.<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, newspapers and bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />
professional media, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g directories) <strong>in</strong><br />
total advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend (Figure 3.3), <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
a significant decl<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980, from around<br />
60% to around 50%. Although television has put<br />
on about three percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>the</strong> more<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong>s are those made by direct mail<br />
and radio, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y represent a step change <strong>in</strong><br />
share, while television has hovered around 25-<br />
27% for many years. The Internet makes a late<br />
appearance, and clearly some element of that<br />
will be accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> owners of <strong>the</strong> press,<br />
although it amounted to less than £200m <strong>in</strong><br />
2000, it outstripped c<strong>in</strong>ema.<br />
However, it is important to stress that although<br />
<strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> press has decl<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> total<br />
revenues accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> press from advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
have grown strongly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same period.<br />
10
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 3.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure <strong>in</strong> real terms<br />
Figure 3.3 Share of advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend by medium<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
100<br />
• Internet<br />
• C<strong>in</strong>ema<br />
• Radio<br />
Outdoor & transport<br />
• DM<br />
6000<br />
80<br />
4000<br />
60<br />
2000<br />
40<br />
20<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
• TV • Total press 2000<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure as<br />
a percentage of gross value-added<br />
2.5<br />
Figure 3.4 Total press advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
10000, £m<br />
2.0<br />
8000<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
6000<br />
0.5<br />
4000<br />
1986<br />
1987<br />
1988<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
2000<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
><br />
11
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 3.5 Press media share of expenditure<br />
on advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
25, % National newspapers<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and professional<br />
• Regional newspapers • Directories<br />
Figure 3.7 Real advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure forecasts<br />
20, %<br />
20<br />
15<br />
15<br />
10<br />
10<br />
5<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Source Pira<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
• Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 2000<br />
1998<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 3.6 Changes <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
by type <strong>in</strong> real terms<br />
15000, £m<br />
12000<br />
Press classified<br />
Press display<br />
•<br />
Total display<br />
9000<br />
6000<br />
3000<br />
1980<br />
1982<br />
1984<br />
1986<br />
1988<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
12
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The share of different publish<strong>in</strong>g media<br />
Figure 3.5 shows <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> different<br />
‘press’ media. Regional newspapers have<br />
clearly lost most share, with national<br />
newspapers and consumer, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />
professional magaz<strong>in</strong>es hold<strong>in</strong>g quite steady<br />
and directories ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early part<br />
of <strong>the</strong> period. Shares of advertis<strong>in</strong>g are affected<br />
not just by gradual changes, but by <strong>the</strong> step<br />
changes aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of new<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g media or <strong>the</strong> sudden expansion of<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs due to specific events, such as new<br />
licences be<strong>in</strong>g made available. Radio is a case<br />
<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t – its share grew follow<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong><br />
licens<strong>in</strong>g that permitted a major <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
number of commercial stations.<br />
3.2.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g by type<br />
It is also useful to look at <strong>the</strong> type of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– broadly <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between display and<br />
classified. This is because <strong>the</strong> drivers and <strong>the</strong><br />
threats to advertis<strong>in</strong>g vary accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> type<br />
of advertis<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> type of advertiser.<br />
Different media have vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />
dependence on different types of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and also, with<strong>in</strong> different media, particularly<br />
newspapers, dependence varies with <strong>the</strong> nature<br />
of <strong>the</strong> paper, e.g. tabloid or broadsheet. This is<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r way of say<strong>in</strong>g that all media don’t<br />
necessarily compete head to head for all types<br />
of advertis<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>y do compete for<br />
‘eyeballs’. This issue will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> greater<br />
detail elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report, especially <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to <strong>the</strong> challenges posed by <strong>the</strong> Internet.<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.6 shows a very strong<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> press classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g, and a<br />
relatively weak growth <strong>in</strong> press display<br />
compared to o<strong>the</strong>r types of display advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The differential performance of regional and<br />
national newspapers will be discussed below.<br />
A by-product of <strong>the</strong> dot.com boom was <strong>the</strong><br />
temporary <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue both<br />
for publishers’ pr<strong>in</strong>t products and onl<strong>in</strong>e sites<br />
from dot.coms seek<strong>in</strong>g to build brand and drive<br />
traffic to <strong>the</strong>ir sites, and <strong>the</strong> loss of this revenue<br />
is a factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last year to 18 months.<br />
3.2.3 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g forecast<br />
Figure 3.7 shows our forecast for advertis<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
<strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>the</strong> decade. The chart shows<br />
three possible outcomes for total advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
revenues for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>the</strong> decade.<br />
• The middle, heavy l<strong>in</strong>e shows a central<br />
forecast for advertis<strong>in</strong>g based on its historical<br />
trends and relationship with <strong>the</strong> performance<br />
of <strong>the</strong> economy as a whole. This l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
represents a cont<strong>in</strong>uation of forces that have<br />
reshaped <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 10 years. It<br />
predicts that 2002 expenditure will be similar<br />
to <strong>the</strong> previous year, with modest growth of<br />
only 2.5% <strong>in</strong> current terms, but <strong>the</strong>reafter<br />
revenues bounce back and cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow<br />
<strong>in</strong> real terms by 4-5% per annum.<br />
• The higher l<strong>in</strong>e is based on <strong>the</strong> Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Association’s ‘High Option’ <strong>in</strong> its 2001 forecast<br />
of long-term trends <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure.<br />
It predicts a quicker bounce back and longterm<br />
annual growth of 5-6% <strong>in</strong> current<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditures.<br />
• The lower l<strong>in</strong>e is based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />
our forecast for 2002 followed by <strong>the</strong><br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association’s ‘Low Option’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
same study, where revenues are assumed to<br />
grow by 3-4% per annum for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />
<strong>the</strong> decade.<br />
3.3 Consumer expenditure of<br />
money and time<br />
3.3.1 Money<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> recently published Mediaphile<br />
2010 report from Screen Digest/ABN AMRO,<br />
which analyses all aspects of consumer<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g on media s<strong>in</strong>ce 1985, consumer<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g on all media products, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>t,<br />
music, TV, video, c<strong>in</strong>ema, mobile and Internet,<br />
both hardware and software, rose from 3.5% of<br />
net <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 6.8% <strong>in</strong> 2000. However,<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g on pr<strong>in</strong>t media rema<strong>in</strong>ed virtually static<br />
<strong>in</strong> real terms over that period, and its share of<br />
total media spend fell from 48% <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 20%<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2000. As pr<strong>in</strong>t products have relatively low<br />
prices compared with, for example, video, music<br />
and pay-TV, and as <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> disposable<br />
<strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion devoted to ><br />
13
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 3.8 Consumer expenditure on recreational<br />
and cultural products<br />
Figure 3.9 Trends <strong>in</strong> consumer credit and<br />
out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
9%<br />
8<br />
7<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
Outstand<strong>in</strong>g consumer credit, % GDP<br />
No. of out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g centres<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
2006<br />
2008<br />
2010<br />
0<br />
1987<br />
1989<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
2001<br />
0<br />
Source Pira<br />
Source Pira<br />
14
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
leisure and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment have risen<br />
substantially, this fall <strong>in</strong> share is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and may not <strong>in</strong> itself matter. The same report<br />
forecasts sales of books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es will<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to rise until 2010, although at a slower<br />
rate than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1985-2000 (books by<br />
3.6% per annum, compared with 5.5%;<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es by 2.1% per annum, compared with<br />
8%). Newspaper sales will, accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Mediaphile, slow to 0.2% per annum <strong>in</strong> 2001-<br />
2010, compared with an average growth of<br />
3.3% <strong>in</strong> 1985-2000.<br />
But <strong>the</strong>se overall figures can disguise some<br />
important trends. For example, <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />
consumers buy<strong>in</strong>g books has fallen, although<br />
book sales are ris<strong>in</strong>g, perhaps lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />
conclusion that <strong>the</strong> population is divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />
heavy readers and non-readers.<br />
Figure 3.8 shows our forecast for spend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
recreational and leisure products.<br />
3.3.2 Personal spend<strong>in</strong>g and shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trends<br />
■ Growth <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g has been <strong>the</strong><br />
motor driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> economy for much of <strong>the</strong><br />
last two decades.<br />
The chart illustrates <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g importance<br />
of recreational and cultural goods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
books, newspapers and periodicals as well as<br />
garden<strong>in</strong>g, records, leisure software, sports<br />
and home computers, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s, and<br />
produces forecasts for <strong>the</strong> next 10 years that<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> upward trend. The rate of growth<br />
for this sector is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with forecasts<br />
produced by o<strong>the</strong>r organisations, such as<br />
ABN-AMRO’s Mediaphile.<br />
In addition to <strong>the</strong> amount consumers spend,<br />
where <strong>the</strong>y spend it is also an important factor<br />
for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, especially<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
chart shows our forecast for consumer credit<br />
and out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
■ The cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g trend towards what might be<br />
called ‘consumption as lifestyle’ is most likely<br />
to cont<strong>in</strong>ue if two relatively recent<br />
developments <strong>in</strong> UK retail<strong>in</strong>g are ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />
■ Figure 3.9 shows <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> consumer<br />
credit (l<strong>in</strong>e) toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> total numbers of<br />
out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g centres (area).<br />
■ Consumer credit has risen sharply <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last<br />
10 years, from under six percent of <strong>in</strong>come to<br />
nearly 14%. A sharp downturn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
market or a rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rates might halt this<br />
trend, but even <strong>the</strong> recession of <strong>the</strong> early<br />
1990s barely dented it.<br />
■ After a pause <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s when plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regulations were tightened, out-of-town<br />
centres have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
importance as dest<strong>in</strong>ations for shopp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The juxtaposition of <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> out-of-town<br />
shopp<strong>in</strong>g and consumer credit is not <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />
imply any relationship between <strong>the</strong> two. They<br />
are simply two trends that have significant<br />
impacts for publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
3.4 Time<br />
What is somewhat more worry<strong>in</strong>g is that <strong>the</strong><br />
time devoted to read<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ted products is<br />
fall<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mediaphile, <strong>the</strong> average<br />
m<strong>in</strong>utes per week spent on pr<strong>in</strong>t media (books,<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers) has fallen from<br />
106 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 81 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
While time spent onl<strong>in</strong>e is ris<strong>in</strong>g (83 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong><br />
2000), <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> beneficiaries of <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
media time usage have been radio, leisure<br />
software (ma<strong>in</strong>ly game consoles), video and<br />
music, as well as mobile phone usage. These<br />
averages of course cover those people who<br />
read noth<strong>in</strong>g at all, and <strong>the</strong>re is o<strong>the</strong>r evidence<br />
– <strong>in</strong> connection with book read<strong>in</strong>g, for example<br />
– which suggests that whole age groups do little<br />
book read<strong>in</strong>g at all, while <strong>the</strong> amount of book<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g undertaken by o<strong>the</strong>r age and gender<br />
groups is ris<strong>in</strong>g substantially.<br />
It must also be noted that some media usage<br />
takes place simultaneously with o<strong>the</strong>r activities,<br />
particularly broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. But this is unlikely to<br />
be particularly beneficial to publish<strong>in</strong>g. As much<br />
as 20% of radio listen<strong>in</strong>g occurs while driv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
for example, and <strong>in</strong>creased use of <strong>the</strong> car for<br />
travell<strong>in</strong>g to work could well have displaced<br />
newspaper read<strong>in</strong>g. This data forms an<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g backdrop to <strong>the</strong> push by media ><br />
15
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 3.10 Industry expectations of impact of<br />
social change and globalisation<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
Next generation<br />
Ag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
English language<br />
Increased demands<br />
Labour market<br />
Higher educational<br />
EU enlargement<br />
Figure 3.12 Regional press reach by age<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
World trade<br />
15-24<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45-54<br />
55-64<br />
65+<br />
High speed networks<br />
Eurozone<br />
Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
Source Pira Survey<br />
• Positive • Negative • Neutral<br />
Figure 3.13 Book buy<strong>in</strong>g propensity by<br />
age group<br />
• Age profile of book buyers • Age profile of population<br />
20<br />
Figure 3.11 Reach of national<br />
newspapers by age<br />
15<br />
80<br />
70<br />
10<br />
60<br />
50<br />
5<br />
40<br />
30<br />
24 and<br />
under<br />
25-34<br />
35-44<br />
45-54<br />
55-64<br />
65+<br />
20<br />
Source Book Market<strong>in</strong>g Ltd<br />
10<br />
15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54<br />
Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />
55-64<br />
65+<br />
16
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
companies to develop cross-platform<br />
strategies and to escape from rigid crossmedia<br />
ownership constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a Henley Centre study<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association, on how book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g is far<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation to o<strong>the</strong>r media,<br />
while time spent on media <strong>in</strong> total is not ris<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>the</strong> percentage of total time spent read<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g apportioned differently, with <strong>the</strong> share of<br />
books ris<strong>in</strong>g (up from 44% <strong>in</strong> 1988 to 52% <strong>in</strong><br />
2000) and <strong>the</strong> share of newspapers (down from<br />
44% to 32%) fall<strong>in</strong>g. Magaz<strong>in</strong>es’ share rose<br />
from 1988 to 1998 (13% to 22%) but has s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
fallen to 16%.<br />
Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>in</strong> contrast with Mediaphile, <strong>the</strong><br />
Henley Centre also found that <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />
time spent read<strong>in</strong>g has risen relative to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
leisure activities, while time spent listen<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
view<strong>in</strong>g has fallen, albeit slightly. The sharpest<br />
rise, unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion of time<br />
spent ‘<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g’.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> questions asked <strong>in</strong> our survey of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry companies (see Appendices for<br />
methodology and text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire)<br />
related to <strong>the</strong> impact of various k<strong>in</strong>ds of social<br />
changes on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The results suggest<br />
that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased demands on consumers’<br />
time constitutes <strong>the</strong> most negatively perceived<br />
aspect of anticipated social changes (see<br />
Figure 3.10). It is also important to note that this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation refers only to consumer media<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g and use, not to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess area.<br />
3.5 Demographic changes<br />
The age profile of <strong>the</strong> population has major<br />
implications for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The<br />
current trend towards <strong>the</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />
population is ma<strong>in</strong>ly seen as positive or neutral,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to our questionnaire.<br />
This is backed up by research which shows<br />
that, for books and newspapers at any rate, <strong>the</strong><br />
usage is skewed towards older age groups.<br />
This would imply a positive outlook for those<br />
sectors because of <strong>the</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> population.<br />
However, unless this pattern is reproduced as<br />
generations mature, it is obvious that publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies will eventually be <strong>in</strong> difficulty.<br />
Because newspapers have actually<br />
experienced decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g circulations – not just <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> UK, but across <strong>the</strong> advanced countries –<br />
Table 3.1 Newspaper readership<br />
profiles by age<br />
Age<br />
group National Regional<br />
15-24 13.5 13.9<br />
25-34 17.4 18.1<br />
35-44 17.8 18.4<br />
45-54 17.5 16.6<br />
55-64 13.5 13.1<br />
65+ 20.2 19.8<br />
Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />
<strong>the</strong>y have tended to be more concerned about<br />
this issue than o<strong>the</strong>r segments. The Newspaper<br />
Society carried out some research with BMRB<br />
<strong>in</strong>to media use by lifestage, which shows very<br />
clearly how <strong>the</strong> different stages of life, e.g. ‘live<br />
with parents’, ‘live with partner’, ‘children left<br />
home’, affect <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of media that is used and<br />
how <strong>in</strong>tensively. This lifestage analysis is<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly more useful than simple age<br />
breakdowns, now that family formation occurs<br />
at very vary<strong>in</strong>g ages, and second families are<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g more common.<br />
A particular problem faces national<br />
newspapers <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y have a limited number<br />
of brands at <strong>the</strong>ir disposal and <strong>the</strong>se brands<br />
tend to become identified with particular age<br />
cohorts, with well-known examples be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Daily Express and <strong>the</strong> Daily Telegraph.<br />
Theoretically <strong>in</strong>teractive media present great<br />
opportunities for publish<strong>in</strong>g companies to break<br />
free of <strong>the</strong> format and brand constra<strong>in</strong>ts that can<br />
prevent <strong>the</strong>m appeal<strong>in</strong>g to new generations of<br />
customers. In practice, it has been difficult so far<br />
to deploy <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> offl<strong>in</strong>e brand to<br />
support <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e one at <strong>the</strong> same time as<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g enough flexibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e brand to<br />
allow it to play <strong>the</strong> desired role of a new,<br />
differentiat<strong>in</strong>g identity. Closely related to this is<br />
<strong>the</strong> issue of monetis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e manifestation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> brand, apart from by driv<strong>in</strong>g sales or ><br />
17
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
defend<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted version.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t environment, some of our<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviewees argued that <strong>the</strong> Metro free dailies<br />
<strong>in</strong> a number of UK cities have a greater appeal<br />
to young people who do not normally read a<br />
paper, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g perhaps that digital media<br />
are not <strong>the</strong> only vehicles for tackl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
generation divide.<br />
Although book publishers have enjoyed ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sales, <strong>the</strong>y too are concerned that younger age<br />
groups may be los<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g habit. More<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated research on read<strong>in</strong>g habits and<br />
motivations across <strong>the</strong> different sectors might<br />
produce results that would be illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
all of <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
3.6 O<strong>the</strong>r factors affect<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
3.6.1 Internet connectivity<br />
Figures 3.14, 3.15 and 3.16 show contrast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
scenario-based forecasts for Internet<br />
connectivity.<br />
Slow<strong>in</strong>g proliferation of Internet connectivity<br />
Take up of <strong>the</strong> Internet at home is an important<br />
factor driv<strong>in</strong>g and reflect<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong><br />
consumer lifestyles. Data for Figure 3.14 is<br />
taken from The Office of National Statistics’<br />
quarterly survey of households access<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet from <strong>the</strong>ir home computer. Over <strong>the</strong> last<br />
year, <strong>the</strong> rapid quarter-on-quarter <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
previously seen have tailed off.<br />
The fitted curve cont<strong>in</strong>ues this slow<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
household penetration cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> next<br />
two years, with <strong>the</strong> total barely ris<strong>in</strong>g above<br />
40%. Predictions are shown for part years to<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> fit of <strong>the</strong> forecast with actual data.<br />
Although low by some alternative forecasts,<br />
currently only 45% of UK households possess<br />
a computer, so <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al figure for Internet<br />
access still represents over 90% of potential.<br />
This forecast is most likely to be true when:<br />
• <strong>the</strong> digital divide cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />
• PC sales cont<strong>in</strong>ue to stall<br />
• broadband availability is limited.<br />
■ The network<strong>in</strong>g of UK society has been slow<br />
compared to <strong>the</strong> US (<strong>the</strong> ‘Atlantic’ divide) and<br />
much slower <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come groups<br />
compared to households higher up <strong>the</strong> social<br />
scale (<strong>the</strong> digital divide). The networked<br />
society scenario is <strong>the</strong>refore more likely to<br />
occur if <strong>the</strong> divides are dim<strong>in</strong>ished over <strong>the</strong><br />
next two to three years.<br />
■ Figure 3.15 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of UK<br />
households access<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Internet for different<br />
<strong>in</strong>come groups <strong>in</strong> 2000 and 2001 (Source:<br />
Family Expenditure Survey). For reference<br />
purposes <strong>the</strong> relatively even penetration of<br />
telephone use across <strong>in</strong>come groups is also<br />
shown. Income decile 1 is <strong>the</strong> poorest 10% of<br />
households and so on up to <strong>the</strong> richest 10%.<br />
■ In <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>in</strong>come groups, 75% of<br />
households can access <strong>the</strong> Internet from<br />
home. If households from all <strong>in</strong>come groups<br />
could do <strong>the</strong> same, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> networked<br />
society would be that much closer.<br />
■ In 2001, decile 8 achieved <strong>the</strong> penetration<br />
rate achieved by decile 10 <strong>in</strong> 2000, decile 7<br />
achieved <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>in</strong> 2001 set by decile 9 <strong>in</strong><br />
2000 and so on. Each year, each decile<br />
achieves roughly <strong>the</strong> same level of<br />
penetration of <strong>the</strong> decile two places higher<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous year.<br />
■ Suppos<strong>in</strong>g up-take of <strong>the</strong> Internet has already<br />
reached maturity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top decile and<br />
historical trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue we would have:<br />
• 57% penetration by end 2003<br />
• 65% penetration by end 2004<br />
• 71% penetration by end 2005<br />
Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Atlantic gap<br />
Figure 3.16 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of UK and<br />
US households able to access <strong>the</strong> Internet from<br />
home. The US data (US Onl<strong>in</strong>e, US Census<br />
Bureau) is much more sporadic than <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
data, but typically <strong>the</strong> penetration rates<br />
achieved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US are 18-24 months ahead<br />
of <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> historical trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong>n home<br />
Internet access would reach 53% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
by 2003, 50% higher than its mid-2001 figure.<br />
To sum up, <strong>the</strong> short history of <strong>the</strong> technology<br />
makes home Internet use difficult to forecast. If<br />
current trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue, <strong>the</strong>n Internet access at<br />
18
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 3.14 Onl<strong>in</strong>e households forecast<br />
Figure 3.16 Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Atlantic gap<br />
50%, UK households onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
• Onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
• Predicted<br />
60%, Households onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
• UK • US<br />
40<br />
50<br />
30<br />
40<br />
20<br />
30<br />
10<br />
20<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
2002<br />
2004<br />
10<br />
Source Pira, based on ONS data<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Figure 3.15 Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> digital gap<br />
• Telephone 2001 • Internet 2001 • Internet 2000<br />
100%, Households<br />
Sources ONS, US Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Census<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
Income decile<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
Source Family Expenditure Survey<br />
><br />
19
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
home is likely to settle at penetration rates of<br />
40-50% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next two years. If, though, <strong>the</strong><br />
digital divide is reduced, penetration rates could<br />
be much higher – 70 to 80%.<br />
3.6.2 Reduc<strong>in</strong>g wastage<br />
Wastage is a major problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> newspaper,<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publish<strong>in</strong>g sectors. The<br />
drive to reduce waste is prompted both by <strong>the</strong><br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial costs to <strong>the</strong> publisher and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />
environmental cost to society as a whole.<br />
Targets have already been agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />
newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry, and <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
has been <strong>the</strong> focus of a major report and a<br />
series of subsequent <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The<br />
newspaper and magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers and supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> organisations meet toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Industry Group (JIG) and <strong>the</strong>re are also a<br />
number of separate <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The sections<br />
deal<strong>in</strong>g with books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Part 1<br />
give more <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> levels of returns<br />
and wastage.<br />
Although we discuss wastage essentially from<br />
<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of view of its impact on<br />
competitiveness, it is clear that <strong>the</strong> measures<br />
we outl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report to improve<br />
<strong>the</strong> efficiency of <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
alternative routes to reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> customer<br />
will also have environmental benefits.<br />
20
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
4<br />
Size and performance of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
4.1 Turnover<br />
Figures 4.1 and 4.2 show <strong>the</strong> turnover of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> official def<strong>in</strong>ition, SIC<br />
22.1 (revised 1992). Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABI mean<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are two overlapp<strong>in</strong>g sets of data that are<br />
not strictly comparable with each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
Research by ONS <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> post-1997<br />
data collection is more reliable than pre-1997.<br />
Both are given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.2 to show as much of<br />
a trend as possible. This shows a picture of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ed and rapid growth apart from a slight<br />
dip <strong>in</strong> 1997. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two runs of data<br />
separately, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry grew by an annual<br />
average rate of 7.4% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1993-97 and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n slowed to an annual average of just under<br />
4.8% over <strong>the</strong> period 1995-99.<br />
An alternative set of data, shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4.1,<br />
drawn from unofficial sources, yielded a higher<br />
turnover figure for 1999 of £18.5bn, which has<br />
tended to become <strong>the</strong> most widely quoted figure<br />
for <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Table 4.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> turnover, based on<br />
unofficial statistics, 1999, £m<br />
Newspapers 7797<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 6211<br />
Books and journals 4476<br />
Total 18,484<br />
Sources The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association, Publishers’ Association,<br />
Periodical Publishers’ Association<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>se data sets is ideal. The official<br />
data has <strong>the</strong> merit of provid<strong>in</strong>g a relatively long<br />
run of data from a s<strong>in</strong>gle source, and be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
comparable with <strong>in</strong>ternational data (see section<br />
on <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons, below). The ABI<br />
gives a total for journals and periodicals <strong>in</strong> 1999<br />
of £6.153bn, which appears to under-represent<br />
<strong>the</strong> revenue from magaz<strong>in</strong>es, particularly<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g activities, which<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r evidence suggests have been among <strong>the</strong><br />
fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Data on<br />
journals is particularly difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> anyway,<br />
so it is impossible to say what <strong>the</strong> figure for<br />
‘periodicals’ alone might be (see Gap Analysis).<br />
The unofficial data – at least as represented <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> constituent elements of <strong>the</strong> £18.5bn figure –<br />
over-represents <strong>the</strong> revenue from newspapers<br />
by us<strong>in</strong>g total expenditure ra<strong>the</strong>r than net<br />
revenue (i.e. gross of advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
distribution expenses which accrue to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
elements of <strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>). For bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, no net revenue figures are<br />
available.<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.3 is <strong>the</strong> sum of net<br />
revenues for newspapers, conventional (i.e. not<br />
contract or customer magaz<strong>in</strong>es) consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and sales of books (<strong>in</strong>voiced at<br />
warehouse prices). Add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> revenues from<br />
customer magaz<strong>in</strong>es of £227m <strong>in</strong> 1999 and<br />
£10.78bn of revenue from bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
activities (drawn from <strong>the</strong> special study<br />
Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, which excludes some<br />
categories such as bus<strong>in</strong>ess TV and credit<br />
reference agencies) gives a total turnover of<br />
£22.33bn. Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong> B2B data is from a<br />
one-off study. This means that <strong>the</strong> best we can<br />
do is arrive at a number of <strong>in</strong>conclusive ‘sizes’<br />
for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. What <strong>the</strong>se different data have<br />
<strong>in</strong> common, however, is that <strong>the</strong>y all depict very<br />
healthy growth.<br />
4.1.1 Revenues from licens<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
rights sales<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> most serious gaps <strong>in</strong> data is<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> revenues publishers derive<br />
from <strong>the</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g and sale of rights (see Table<br />
4.2). Clearly, this is ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of book<br />
and journal publish<strong>in</strong>g, but magaz<strong>in</strong>e companies<br />
also engage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sale and purchase of<br />
formats, often <strong>in</strong>ternationally, and license <strong>the</strong><br />
use of <strong>the</strong>ir brands. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
companies also license <strong>in</strong>formation to third<br />
parties for redistribution. Some of this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong> from annual<br />
reports. A separate research exercise simply on<br />
this topic would be worthwhile, though it might<br />
reveal an unwill<strong>in</strong>gness to divulge <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> opportunities for publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future is likely to be <strong>the</strong> use of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir core assets across many more platforms<br />
and channels, not all of which will be under <strong>the</strong><br />
direct control of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies.<br />
Therefore, hav<strong>in</strong>g data on this area will be<br />
vital to understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> total picture.<br />
22
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 4.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> turnover, SIC 22.1<br />
Figure 4.3 Net revenues – three sub-sectors<br />
20000, £m<br />
12000, £m<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
10000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
5000<br />
2000<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />
(data for 2000 provisional)<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association, PA<br />
Figure 4.2 Trend turnover data from ABI, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
data discont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />
20000, £m<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry (data for<br />
2000 provisional)<br />
Table 4.2 Royalties, publish<strong>in</strong>g, 1999, £m<br />
Exports 376<br />
Imports 168<br />
Balance 208<br />
Source UK Trade <strong>in</strong> Services<br />
><br />
23
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
4.2 Costs and resources<br />
There is little data available on costs for<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g as a whole, but <strong>the</strong> Annual<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry gives a figure for total<br />
employment costs (Tables 4.3 and Figure 4.4).<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce employment data is unavailable before<br />
1998, it is only possible to show gross valueadded<br />
per employee for three years (Figure<br />
4.5). It appears to have grown rapidly – GVA per<br />
employee <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g grew by 13.9% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />
period, for example.<br />
More detailed data on purchases of goods<br />
and services is only available up to 1999, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> break <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> series <strong>in</strong> 1997, so two numbers<br />
are given for that year <strong>in</strong> Table 4.4. This<br />
appears to show a fairly steep rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />
purchases of goods and materials from 1993 to<br />
1997, and a slow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>reafter. This is very<br />
much <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> subsequent chart on paper<br />
prices, show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sharp rise <strong>in</strong> that period.<br />
The rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> figure for telecommunications<br />
services and computer and related services is<br />
more likely to reflect a more extensive use of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se services, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a rise <strong>in</strong> prices.<br />
4.2.1 Paper prices<br />
Figure 4.6 illustrates <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> paper prices<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce 1987, show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> volatility, <strong>the</strong> sharp rise<br />
<strong>in</strong> newspr<strong>in</strong>t prices <strong>in</strong> 2001 and <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />
fall <strong>in</strong> 2002.<br />
There is still concern, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry, about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
concentration of paper supply and a fear that<br />
<strong>in</strong>appropriate action to support European<br />
producers would make <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
more vulnerable to price rises. The suppliers<br />
have already declared <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>tention to try to<br />
limit price volatility <strong>in</strong> future by controll<strong>in</strong>g supply<br />
more effectively.<br />
Table 4.3 Employment, employment costs<br />
and gross value-added<br />
Turnover, Gross value- Employment Employment<br />
basic £m added, basic 000s cosfs<br />
prices, £m<br />
1995 14059 6425 n.a. 2742<br />
1996 15108 6316 n.a. 2929<br />
1997 15053 6421 n.a. 3338<br />
1998 16106 7147 173 3623<br />
1999 16849 7790 163 3798<br />
2000 18371 8409 164 4254<br />
Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />
Table 4.4 Purchases of goods, materials<br />
and services<br />
Total purchases Purchases of Purchases of Purchases of<br />
of goods, telecoms computer advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
materials and services and related and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
services services services<br />
£m £m £m £m<br />
1993 5940.9 – – –<br />
1994 6225.3 – – –<br />
1995 7302.0 – – –<br />
1996 8226.1 97.6 65.4 576.9<br />
1997 8799.7 111.5 79.0 657.1<br />
1997 8564 105 75 675<br />
1998 9021 110 91 707<br />
1999 9104 117 98 695<br />
24
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 4.4 Gross value-added and<br />
employment costs<br />
10000<br />
• Gross value added • Employment costs<br />
Figure 4.6 Trends <strong>in</strong> publication paper pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />
1000, euro per ton<br />
• Newspr<strong>in</strong>t • SC • LWC<br />
8000<br />
800<br />
6000<br />
600<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
1987<br />
1989<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
2001E 2002E<br />
Source Merrill Lynch<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Note: LWC = Light weight coated; SC = Super calendared<br />
Source ONS ABI<br />
Figure 4.5 Gross value-added per employee<br />
150, 1998 = 100<br />
Figure 4.7 Newspr<strong>in</strong>t capacity and demand<br />
50<br />
• Capacity • Demand<br />
120<br />
40<br />
90<br />
30<br />
60<br />
20<br />
30<br />
10<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Europe<br />
N America<br />
Asia<br />
World<br />
Source ONS ABI<br />
Source World Press Trends<br />
><br />
25
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
4.3 Cross <strong>in</strong>dustry comparison<br />
In assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry it is useful to have<br />
comparisons across sectors, but f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gful comparators is not straightforward,<br />
especially for a sector such as publish<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />
straddles <strong>the</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g/service divide. The<br />
OECD makes a useful division between<br />
Information and Communications Technology<br />
(ICT)-produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries and ICT-us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries, classify<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong><br />
latter group. For <strong>the</strong> comparators we have<br />
chosen sub-sectors mostly from <strong>the</strong> ICT-us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries, with telecommunications from <strong>the</strong><br />
ICT-producers.<br />
Figures 4.8 and 4.9 summarise data from <strong>the</strong><br />
Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry and place publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
its context. There are many more enterprises <strong>in</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g compared to publish<strong>in</strong>g, which has seen<br />
a growth <strong>in</strong> enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s alongside<br />
<strong>the</strong> growth seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The largest rate of growth –<br />
although from <strong>the</strong> smallest base – is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
record<strong>in</strong>g media sub-sector.<br />
Employment has been broadly stable <strong>in</strong> all<br />
five <strong>in</strong>dustries, aga<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> exception of<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g media where <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
employees rose by 50% between 1998 and<br />
2000. Value-added is highest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
telecommunications <strong>in</strong>dustry, which has seen<br />
sharp rises <strong>in</strong> productivity dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s.<br />
The rise <strong>in</strong> value-added <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g is more<br />
modest and broadly matches that seen <strong>in</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Comparative data on measures of<br />
entrepreneurship are hard to f<strong>in</strong>d for any<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries. The UK competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
use figures from <strong>the</strong> Annual Respondents’<br />
Database (ARD), but measures for sub-sectors<br />
are only available at relatively high levels of<br />
aggregation. Figure 4.10 illustrates this, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
entry and exit rates per year for a number of<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries 1 . <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is<br />
amalgamated with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> pulp<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> sector 22. As far as we can tell,<br />
this sector is fairly representative of UK<br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, with perhaps a slightly higher<br />
than average rate of entry.<br />
Entry and exit rates are used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Competitiveness Indicators as a marker of<br />
entrepreneurship, on <strong>the</strong> basis that high levels<br />
should <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple improve resource allocation.<br />
However, high entry rates are not always a<br />
good sign of entrepreneurship; bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
growth rates and <strong>in</strong>novation also need to be<br />
taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
1 The <strong>in</strong>formation is from Entry, Exit and Establishment<br />
Survival <strong>in</strong> UK Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by Richard Disney, Jonathan<br />
Haskel and Ylva Heden<br />
26
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 4.8 Number of enterprises,<br />
five <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
Figure 4.10 Entry and exit rates <strong>in</strong> seven<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
25000<br />
Telecommunications • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> •<br />
• Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Reproduction of recorded media<br />
0.4<br />
• Entry rate • Exit rate<br />
20000<br />
0.3<br />
15000<br />
0.2<br />
10000<br />
0.1<br />
5000<br />
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000<br />
Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />
Figure 4.9 Value-added, five <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
Chemical<br />
Mechanical eng.<br />
Computers<br />
Electrical eng<br />
Instrumental<br />
Food, tobacco dr<strong>in</strong>k<br />
Textile<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g/publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Source Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival <strong>in</strong> UK Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by<br />
Richard Disney, Jonathan Haskel and Ylva Heden<br />
ALL<br />
20000<br />
Telecommunications • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> • Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g •<br />
recorded media<br />
Reproduction of<br />
16000<br />
12000<br />
8000<br />
4000<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />
><br />
27
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
4.4 International comparisons of<br />
productivity and <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
We have noted already <strong>the</strong> scepticism with<br />
which <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons should be<br />
treated. Figure 4.11 shows productivity <strong>in</strong>dices<br />
for publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> five countries dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s,<br />
based on data from <strong>the</strong> OECD, as compiled by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Gron<strong>in</strong>gen Growth and Development Centre<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. Productivity is measured <strong>in</strong><br />
value added (1995 prices) per worker,<br />
unadjusted for hours worked. In addition <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
employment figure excludes <strong>the</strong> self-employed.<br />
For all countries <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is set to 100 <strong>in</strong> 1990,<br />
except for Germany (1991).<br />
The pattern of change <strong>in</strong> productivity across<br />
<strong>the</strong>se five countries is at variance with <strong>the</strong><br />
standard picture of economy-wide productivity<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s. The US shows <strong>the</strong><br />
weakest productivity growth with <strong>the</strong> highest<br />
rates of growth <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ental Europe. The UK<br />
lies somewhere <strong>in</strong> between, show<strong>in</strong>g gentle<br />
growth <strong>in</strong> productivity. O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries covered<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gron<strong>in</strong>gen <strong>in</strong>dices exhibit a more similar<br />
pattern to <strong>the</strong> standard one, so it would appear<br />
that <strong>the</strong> performance of publish<strong>in</strong>g is, <strong>in</strong> fact, at<br />
variance with <strong>the</strong> overall <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
productivity picture. There are some possible<br />
explanations: US companies suffered from <strong>the</strong><br />
strong dollar <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> 1990s,<br />
while conversely, Eurozone countries benefited<br />
from <strong>the</strong> weaken<strong>in</strong>g Euro. With its strengths <strong>in</strong><br />
scientific publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands has<br />
particularly benefited from <strong>the</strong> strong dollar, as<br />
has <strong>the</strong> German publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. There is<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r evidence from <strong>the</strong> Newspaper Association<br />
of America that <strong>the</strong>re was a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong> productivity <strong>in</strong> that part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. We<br />
have also been told <strong>in</strong> a number of <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
that <strong>the</strong> diffusion of new technology and more<br />
efficient work<strong>in</strong>g practices has perhaps not gone<br />
as far with<strong>in</strong> US newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g as might<br />
be expected, and not as far as it has <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
It must be emphasised that this graph depicts<br />
growth trends, not absolute levels of<br />
productivity. Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons<br />
for sub-sectors of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry are made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
relevant sections of <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
Reliable figures for comparisons of <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
are even harder to f<strong>in</strong>d. The UK<br />
competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators uses data from <strong>the</strong><br />
second Community Innovation Survey (CIS)<br />
(Figure 4.12), but at <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry this<br />
source becomes quite unreliable. ‘<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’ is<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and wood pulp and only<br />
133 firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />
It is also quite dated (from 1996-97 – although<br />
CIS 3 is currently under preparation) and so its<br />
relevance to 2002 must be taken with a p<strong>in</strong>ch of<br />
salt. The figure below shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of<br />
firms <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dustry stat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced a new or improved product with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
last year. The percentage of UK firms <strong>in</strong> this<br />
category is above <strong>the</strong> average for <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Union (plus Norway) as a whole, but below <strong>the</strong><br />
figures for Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands.<br />
Figure 4.13 illustrates <strong>the</strong> positive trade<br />
balance <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter, which is <strong>the</strong> nearest<br />
available data to publish<strong>in</strong>g. The data is <strong>in</strong><br />
dollars – <strong>in</strong> national currency terms <strong>the</strong> picture<br />
for Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands would look<br />
much better. Naturally this is not an ideal<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ition, and it also should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />
UK publishers have made <strong>the</strong> decision to pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
a great deal of material abroad both for cost<br />
reasons and to facilitate access to third markets.<br />
28
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 4.11 International comparisons of<br />
productivity growth <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
150<br />
120<br />
90<br />
• Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands • US • UK • Germany • France<br />
1991 1993 1995 1997<br />
Source Gron<strong>in</strong>gen Growth and Development Centre<br />
1999<br />
Figure 4.12 Product and process <strong>in</strong>novation<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
Wood pulp and paper; publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation<br />
• Computer and related activities;<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g services<br />
4.5 Conclusion<br />
Despite <strong>the</strong> very considerable difficulties and<br />
dangers of draw<strong>in</strong>g conclusions based on <strong>the</strong><br />
evidence available, it is possible to make some<br />
general statements. In terms of value-added<br />
and productivity, <strong>the</strong> data does not seem greatly<br />
at variance with o<strong>the</strong>r UK <strong>in</strong>dustries, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
<strong>the</strong> conclusion that publish<strong>in</strong>g is likely to occupy<br />
<strong>the</strong> same sort of <strong>in</strong>ternational rank<strong>in</strong>g as UK<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole i.e. beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> US and <strong>the</strong><br />
more advanced cont<strong>in</strong>ental European countries.<br />
But as <strong>the</strong> (official) def<strong>in</strong>ition of publish<strong>in</strong>g used<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se comparisons excludes at least some of<br />
<strong>the</strong> fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g and most <strong>in</strong>novative<br />
segments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> true picture might<br />
be somewhat more positive.<br />
In terms of broader measures of performance,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g product and service <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />
diversity, we conclude that <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top rank <strong>in</strong>ternationally, a<br />
conclusion broadly supported by an EU<br />
Commission report which will be drawn on <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> sections consider<strong>in</strong>g sub-sectors, below.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections look at <strong>the</strong> major<br />
sectors of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. It does not<br />
analyse every <strong>in</strong>dicator, but draws out <strong>the</strong> most<br />
significant elements.<br />
0<br />
Germany<br />
France<br />
Ireland<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Source Community Innovations Survey<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Sweden<br />
UK<br />
Total<br />
Figure 4.13 Trade balance <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter<br />
2500, $<br />
• US • UK • Germany • Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands • S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Source United Nations<br />
29
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
5<br />
Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
5.1 Revenues<br />
Figure 5.1 shows publishers’ total book sales,<br />
home and export, at ex-warehouse prices,<br />
based on <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association survey<br />
and also on data from <strong>the</strong> ONS Prodcom series,<br />
which arrive at similar figures via different<br />
methodologies. Major revisions to <strong>the</strong> Prodcom<br />
series have led us to use <strong>the</strong> latest run of data<br />
(1997-2000) only. The PA figures carry us only<br />
to 1999 at present, although <strong>the</strong> organisation is<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of chang<strong>in</strong>g to a more frequent<br />
series based on distributors’ <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
The grow<strong>in</strong>g importance of <strong>the</strong> Internet as a<br />
channel for sell<strong>in</strong>g books is clearly seen <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 5.2, and it seems to be widely felt that<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet is grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
simply tak<strong>in</strong>g share from <strong>the</strong> traditional channel.<br />
To date, though, <strong>the</strong>re is no firm support for this<br />
conclusion.<br />
5.2 Export performance<br />
Figures 5.3 to 5.5 show <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> home and<br />
export sales; <strong>the</strong> performance by category and<br />
<strong>the</strong> trade balance. However, as discussed<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on expand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
markets, below, <strong>the</strong> major difficulty <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g this data is <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
globalisation of <strong>the</strong> book publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
More and more books are now produced under<br />
licence or directly by subsidiaries <strong>in</strong> third<br />
markets ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g exported directly<br />
from <strong>the</strong> UK, but this data is available to <strong>the</strong><br />
publishers, who treat <strong>the</strong> revenue <strong>in</strong> various<br />
ways <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir accounts, and is not captured <strong>in</strong><br />
a publicly available form. The charts might be<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpreted to suggest that <strong>the</strong>re is some cause<br />
for concern <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> trade performance. In fact,<br />
this cannot be implied reliably, but never<strong>the</strong>less<br />
<strong>the</strong> period of decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trade balance (post-<br />
1996) does co<strong>in</strong>cide closely with <strong>the</strong> era of<br />
<strong>the</strong> strong pound.<br />
5.3 Titles<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.6 shows that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
has greatly expanded <strong>the</strong> number of titles it<br />
produces across all categories. In one sense<br />
this is a great strength and a tribute to<br />
<strong>in</strong>novation and creativity. But <strong>the</strong> downside is<br />
that many of <strong>the</strong>se titles are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be sold<br />
unprofitably or not at all. They will be a cost<br />
through <strong>the</strong> returns process, and f<strong>in</strong>ish up be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pulped, which represents an additional f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
and environmental cost. The book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess historically concentrated on push<strong>in</strong>g<br />
product out <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and has taken<br />
less account than it should of whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> books<br />
will sell. Typically 20% of a publisher’s titles will<br />
account for 80% of <strong>the</strong> revenues. Publishers<br />
seem divided over whe<strong>the</strong>r this is simply an<br />
<strong>in</strong>evitable consequence of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess –<br />
forecast<strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r a particular title will sell is,<br />
after all, not like forecast<strong>in</strong>g demand for nappies<br />
or baked beans – or someth<strong>in</strong>g which<br />
publishers should be actively try<strong>in</strong>g to change.<br />
Book publish<strong>in</strong>g, especially on <strong>the</strong> fiction side,<br />
resembles <strong>the</strong> music and film bus<strong>in</strong>ess, where<br />
a few hits will be balanced by a large number of<br />
failures. However, <strong>the</strong> odds can be shifted to<br />
some extent by research <strong>in</strong>to know<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
customer better. There is much better data<br />
available now both through <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of surveys<br />
carried out by Book Market<strong>in</strong>g and also through<br />
Whitakers BookTrack, for example. Some<br />
publishers seem able to make better use of<br />
this than o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> tailor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir offer<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />
<strong>the</strong> market.<br />
Book publish<strong>in</strong>g is quite fragmented, but with<br />
a small number of publishers and titles<br />
account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> majority of sales. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a special report by KPMG <strong>in</strong> 1998, which<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong>, 3% of titles<br />
accounted for 50% of <strong>the</strong> volume of retail sales.<br />
Fewer than 40 out of 15,000 publishers<br />
accounted for 56% of bookshop sales. But no<br />
one publisher had a market share of more than<br />
9%. Book retail<strong>in</strong>g is also fragmented, but<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ated by four cha<strong>in</strong>s, which toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
accounted for 42% of retail sales. Aga<strong>in</strong>,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to KPMG, <strong>the</strong> cost of distribution<br />
to publishers was extremely high, at 13% of<br />
sales, compared with an average 6% <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry overall.<br />
Figure 5.7 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of returns <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> market. Unfortunately, this figure is not<br />
30
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 5.1 Total book sales, home and export,<br />
£m, ex-warehouse prices<br />
3500<br />
Figure 5.2 UK book sales, retail value, £m<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
• Traditional channels • Internet<br />
• Total sales • Sales (Prodcom) 500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
1985 1987 1989<br />
Source Mediaphile 2010<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
2001<br />
1990 1992 1994 1996<br />
Sources The Publishers’ Association, ONS<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Figure 5.3 UK sales: home and export<br />
Figure 5.5 Exports as a percentage of sales<br />
60%<br />
Total exports, % of sales •<br />
• School and ELT exports, % of sales •<br />
Academic/prof. exports, % of sales<br />
Consumer exports, % of sales<br />
2500, £m<br />
2000<br />
• Total, home • Total, export<br />
50<br />
1500<br />
40<br />
30<br />
1000<br />
20<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
10<br />
Source PA<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Figure 5.4 Trade balance <strong>in</strong> books<br />
Source PA<br />
600, £m<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Source ONS<br />
31
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 5.6 Titles published<br />
120000<br />
100000<br />
80000<br />
102102<br />
98477<br />
102925<br />
108744<br />
Figure 5.8 Trends <strong>in</strong> book prices<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
• ONS PPI (1990 = 100) • ONS PPI (1990 = 100), relative to RPI<br />
60000<br />
120<br />
40000<br />
110<br />
20000<br />
100<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Source J Whitaker<br />
Source ONS<br />
Figure 5.7 Returns as % of net sales<br />
Consumer<br />
150<br />
140<br />
Average books prices (1990 = 100); unit prices (Bookseller)<br />
• RPI (1990 = 100)<br />
School and ELT<br />
Academic and professional<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
Total<br />
100<br />
0% 3 6 9 12 15<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Source PA<br />
Sources The Bookseller, ONS<br />
Figure 5.9 Employment<br />
50000<br />
40000<br />
30000<br />
20000<br />
10000<br />
1994 1996 1998 2000<br />
Source Labour Force Survey (data for spr<strong>in</strong>g of each year)<br />
32
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 5.1 F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial data 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99<br />
Profit as % sales 6.8 8.3 8.3<br />
Profit as % total assets 11.4 10 9.7<br />
Profit as % of<br />
capital employed 25.2 24 20.1<br />
Pay per employee 20,363 21,059 22,492<br />
Sales per employee 124,000 124,000 129,000<br />
Capital employed<br />
per employee 46,000 51,000 53,000<br />
Pay to sales ratio 17.60 17.20 17.60<br />
Source ICC, based on returns from 113 companies<br />
Table 5.2 Regional distribution of employment, book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g and total publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
All <strong>in</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g by region; not seasonally adjusted;<br />
UK, spr<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />
22.1 22.11: % of total % of total<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g book <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong> each<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g region: region<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 194780 36401 100.0 100.0<br />
Tyne & Wear 3801 453 2.0 1.24<br />
Rest of North East 440 0 0.2 0<br />
Greater Manchester 1978 0 1.01 0<br />
Merseyside 853 0 0.43 0<br />
Rest of North West 5256 1892 2.7 5.20<br />
South Yorkshire 1789 0 0.9 0<br />
West Yorkshire 4131 437 2.1 1.2<br />
Rest of Yorkshire &<br />
Humberside 2533 0 1.3 0<br />
East Midlands 8926 1822 4.58 5.01<br />
West Midlands<br />
Metropolitan County 6183 580 3.17 1.59<br />
Rest of West Midlands 4718 0 2.42 0<br />
East of England 24019 4216 12.33 11.58<br />
Inner London 31107 6659 15.97 18.29<br />
Outer London 29108 6735 14.94 18.50<br />
South East 34201 9826 17.56 27.0<br />
South West 13013 2000 6.68 5.49<br />
Wales 3947 536 2.03 1.47<br />
Strathclyde 5783 852 2.97 2.34<br />
Rest of Scotland 8578 393 4.40 1.08<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 4416 0 2.27 0<br />
Source Labour Force Survey<br />
available on a regular basis, so it is hard to say<br />
what <strong>the</strong> trend is, but no-one suggested to us<br />
that it was fall<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>y po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />
<strong>the</strong> UK returns rate is actually a lot better than<br />
<strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>ternational markets, notably <strong>the</strong> US.<br />
But it is widely agreed that it needs to come<br />
down, and that even at <strong>the</strong> current rate, costs<br />
can be removed from <strong>the</strong> returns process<br />
through automation – this is underway through<br />
<strong>the</strong> Book Industry Communication (BIC) returns<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative. Some publishers would like to see <strong>the</strong><br />
cha<strong>in</strong> move to firm sale on backlist, which is<br />
now <strong>in</strong> operation <strong>in</strong> Australia.<br />
5.4 Prices<br />
There are many different book price <strong>in</strong>dices<br />
available, but accord<strong>in</strong>g to Book Market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />
most accurate measure is <strong>the</strong> PPI produced by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Office of National Statistics, as this uses a<br />
methodology that measures changes <strong>in</strong> a<br />
sample of products that are as nearly identical<br />
as possible. The trend <strong>in</strong> this is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />
5.8, nom<strong>in</strong>ally and relative to <strong>the</strong> Retail Price<br />
Index. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that book prices (across all<br />
categories) have <strong>in</strong>creased slightly faster than<br />
<strong>the</strong> RPI. Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> Bookseller <strong>in</strong>dices,<br />
which measure <strong>the</strong> average cover prices ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than <strong>the</strong> prices reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> books actually<br />
sold, gives a slightly different picture, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that while book prices outstripped <strong>the</strong> RPI quite<br />
considerably over <strong>the</strong> period 1981 to 1999, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
rose slightly slower than <strong>the</strong> RPI <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period<br />
1990-1999. Overall, 49% of books were sold at<br />
discount <strong>in</strong> 1999, up from 41% <strong>in</strong> 1997.<br />
5.5 Profitability<br />
See Table 5.1.<br />
5.6 Employment, skills and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
The variability of data on employment from <strong>the</strong><br />
Labour Force Survey has already been<br />
mentioned as ma<strong>in</strong>ly an artefact of <strong>the</strong> small<br />
sample size. There are no <strong>in</strong>dustry data<br />
collected on employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector. The high<br />
number of staff employed on a non-standard<br />
basis (freelancers, etc) is a complicat<strong>in</strong>g factor<br />
<strong>in</strong> any attempt to arrive at a figure and it ><br />
33
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
makes attempts to calculate output or revenue<br />
per employee across <strong>the</strong> sector next to<br />
impossible. Some <strong>in</strong>dividual companies told us<br />
that <strong>the</strong>y do measure this, or use <strong>in</strong>dications<br />
such as titles produced per employee. The data<br />
from <strong>the</strong> ICC survey on sales per employee<br />
may reflect only <strong>the</strong> full-time employees for <strong>the</strong><br />
companies concerned, which are <strong>in</strong> any case<br />
<strong>the</strong> largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector. They do show a<br />
significant rise <strong>in</strong> 1988-99.<br />
The regional data shows that 64% of all book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong><br />
South East, compared with 48% of all<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g employment. This is a contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
factor to some of <strong>the</strong> issues discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
skill shortages part of <strong>the</strong> report, below.<br />
Table 5.3 is based on <strong>the</strong> comprehensive<br />
survey of skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g issues carried<br />
out by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> National Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Organisation (NTO). This will also be used <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r sections as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on skills and related issues.<br />
Data on skill levels shows <strong>the</strong> high average<br />
level of qualification <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry across <strong>the</strong><br />
board, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sales and market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
even <strong>in</strong> office adm<strong>in</strong>istration and secretarial.<br />
This clearly reflects <strong>the</strong> perceived desirability of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as an employer, and <strong>the</strong> attempt to<br />
get one foot on <strong>the</strong> ladder. It is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to note <strong>the</strong> very high level of qualifications <strong>in</strong><br />
production, almost as high as management<br />
and editorial.<br />
Table 5.3 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Qualifications No or low Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />
level, % eg O levels eg A levels eg Degree eg postgraduate<br />
% % % %<br />
Management 4 8 6 68 8.0<br />
Editorial 2 10 11 71 2.0<br />
Support 9 14 30 42 0<br />
Office adm<strong>in</strong>. & sec. 6 21 31 34 0<br />
Production 2 11 22 62 0<br />
Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and circulation 3 16 30 44 0<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 4 23 31 42 0<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 5 16 26 37 0<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
Figure 5.10 Differ<strong>in</strong>g estimates of book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g employment<br />
40000<br />
35000<br />
30000<br />
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Sources Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry, Annual Employment Survey,<br />
Labour Force Survey<br />
• ABI • AES • LFS<br />
2000<br />
34
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 5.11 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g turnover as % of GDP,<br />
one of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators used for rank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
0.5%<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
Denmark Germany<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
Italy<br />
Sweden<br />
Source EU Commission, Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />
European <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />
Figure 5.12 Book titles published<br />
per million population<br />
UK<br />
EU average<br />
EU average<br />
Denmark<br />
Germany<br />
Greece<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
France<br />
Ireland<br />
Italy<br />
Luxembourg<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Austria<br />
Portugal<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Sweden<br />
UK<br />
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />
Source EU Commission, Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />
European <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />
5.7 International comparisons<br />
A major report produced for <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Commission <strong>in</strong> 1999, which explored<br />
comparative competitiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries across <strong>the</strong> EU, found that <strong>the</strong> lack of<br />
data on a national basis was compounded when<br />
it came to try<strong>in</strong>g to make comparisons across<br />
borders. The <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>the</strong> authors selected (for<br />
want of any better <strong>in</strong> many cases) were:<br />
• Titles per million population (we have already<br />
discussed whe<strong>the</strong>r this is a strength or a<br />
weakness, above)<br />
• Turnover as % of GDP<br />
• Trade balance (aga<strong>in</strong>, problems with this one)<br />
• Turnover growth rate<br />
On <strong>the</strong> basis of a weighted consideration of<br />
all <strong>the</strong>se factors, <strong>the</strong> UK was ranked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top<br />
group, along with Denmark, Germany, Spa<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Italy and Sweden.<br />
35
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
6<br />
Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
6.1 Revenues and costs<br />
Very little authoritative data is available on <strong>the</strong><br />
revenues or costs of journal publishers. The<br />
Publishers Association and <strong>the</strong> Association of<br />
Learned and Professional Society Publishers<br />
(ALPSP) have commissioned a number of<br />
surveys, which are referred to here, but <strong>the</strong>se<br />
have been hampered by high non-response<br />
rates, especially on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
publishers. The surveys, carried out <strong>in</strong> 2000<br />
and 2001 for <strong>the</strong> PA and ALPSP by TFPL,<br />
found that <strong>the</strong>re was little overlap between <strong>the</strong><br />
respondents <strong>in</strong> both years, so <strong>the</strong>y took <strong>the</strong><br />
decision to comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> data toge<strong>the</strong>r, which<br />
is shown below <strong>in</strong> table 6.1. Some data was<br />
published by <strong>the</strong> Competition Commission <strong>in</strong> its<br />
report on <strong>the</strong> Reed-Elsevier/Harcourt merger <strong>in</strong><br />
2001, which is also drawn on <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />
Data from <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association shows<br />
a healthy growth <strong>in</strong> worldwide revenues to UKbased<br />
publishers (Figure 6.1).<br />
The data from <strong>the</strong> surveys carried out by<br />
TFPL for ALPSP and <strong>the</strong> PA shows <strong>the</strong> extreme<br />
ranges of annual sales and number of titles<br />
produced (Table 6.2). Sales data <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
revenue from subscriptions, licences,<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and any o<strong>the</strong>r source generated<br />
directly by publication of <strong>the</strong> titles.<br />
It also shows how <strong>in</strong>ternationalised <strong>the</strong> journal<br />
market is, with total sales be<strong>in</strong>g far <strong>in</strong> excess of<br />
UK sales. The survey also shows <strong>the</strong><br />
importance of electronic journals: 91 out of 169<br />
publishers toge<strong>the</strong>r produced over 1940 titles<br />
electronically. In 1999, <strong>the</strong> number of titles<br />
(based on 63 out of 96 respondents) was 1200.<br />
58 of <strong>the</strong> respondents publish all <strong>the</strong>ir journals<br />
<strong>in</strong> electronic form (Table 6.3).<br />
Typical revenue and costs for an STM and<br />
humanities/social science journal were supplied<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Competition Commission by Journal<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, but with <strong>the</strong> caveat that <strong>the</strong>se vary<br />
very widely from journal to journal, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on circulation (scale economies), subject matter<br />
and ability to attract advertis<strong>in</strong>g. This shows<br />
some significant differences between STM and<br />
humanities/social science.<br />
Figure 6.1 Journal revenues, £m<br />
Revenues received by UK publishers from worldwide subscriptions to<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir UK-based journals (exclud<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g, licens<strong>in</strong>g, etc)<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
1997<br />
Source Publishers Association<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
Table 6.1 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators,<br />
1999-2000, based on 169 respondents<br />
Total sales, £m 554.3<br />
Median turnover, £ 205,968<br />
Range of annual sales<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum, £ 1,800<br />
Maximum, £m 111.9<br />
Number of titles produced<br />
Total 2769<br />
Median per publisher 3<br />
Range 1-650<br />
Table 6.2 UK sales, based on 167 publishers<br />
Total UK sales, £m 190.6<br />
Median turnover, £ 70,000<br />
Range of annual UK sales<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum, £ 200<br />
Maximum, £m 67<br />
Source TFPL for ALPSP and PA<br />
Table 6.3 Electronic journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
No. of publishers produc<strong>in</strong>g electronic journals 91<br />
No. of titles produced electronically 1940<br />
Source TFPL for ALPSP and PA<br />
36
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 6.5 Typical <strong>in</strong>come and costs of<br />
a journal, percentage of total<br />
Revenues<br />
STM<br />
Humanities and<br />
social sciences<br />
Subscriptions 85 74<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy/back volumes 6 2<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g/mail<strong>in</strong>g list 5 2<br />
Offpr<strong>in</strong>ts/repr<strong>in</strong>ts 1 8<br />
Permissions 1 0<br />
<strong>Page</strong> charges/submission fees 0 12<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 2 0<br />
Total 100 100<br />
Costs<br />
Production 58 56<br />
Postage 6 7<br />
Distribution 2 2<br />
Total 66 64<br />
Gross marg<strong>in</strong> 34 36<br />
Source Journal <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Table 6.6 Percentage annual price <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
<strong>in</strong> journals<br />
Science and Medic<strong>in</strong>e Humanities and Inflation<br />
technology social (based<br />
sciences on RPI)<br />
1990 12.5 13.5 11.9 9<br />
1991 9 -1.9 18.3 6<br />
1992 14.1 16.5 14.5 4<br />
1993 7.8 5.9 6.9 2<br />
1994 23.5 21.8 17.2 2<br />
1995 10.5 8.8 7.3 3<br />
1996 13.5 12.3 11.1 2<br />
1997 9.3 10.7 7.4 3<br />
1998 2.4 6 9.5 3<br />
1999 10.6 5.9 9.4 2<br />
2000 10 12 14 2<br />
Source Blackwell’s<br />
The Competition Commission report gave an<br />
estimate of <strong>the</strong> number of new STM journals<br />
launched each year from 1990 to 2000 as about<br />
200-300, with considerable variation from year<br />
to year and no obvious trend. The report said<br />
that ‘considerably’ fewer than 200 journals are<br />
successfully established each year. It does not<br />
appear from figures given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report that<br />
large publishers (by market share) account for<br />
a disproportionately large share of successful<br />
launches. Medium-sized publishers did<br />
especially well at launches compared with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
market share. Given <strong>the</strong> problem that library<br />
budgets are limited, a new journal usually has<br />
to replace a title and so <strong>the</strong> key factor is how<br />
quickly a publisher can respond to a shift <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a research community.<br />
Publishers of lead<strong>in</strong>g journals have tended to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> size and price of <strong>the</strong>ir ‘must-have’<br />
journals, as an alternative to launch<strong>in</strong>g new<br />
titles. This can squeeze <strong>the</strong> market space<br />
available to new entrants.<br />
6.2 Prices<br />
The percentage changes <strong>in</strong> journal prices for<br />
each year s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Blackwell’s<br />
Periodicals Division, show that prices have<br />
tended to rise considerably faster than <strong>the</strong><br />
average rate of <strong>in</strong>flation.<br />
37
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
7<br />
Newspapers<br />
7.1 Revenue trends<br />
Figures 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 show <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> net<br />
revenues accru<strong>in</strong>g to publishers, from both copy<br />
sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g, for national and regional<br />
papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
This positive overall picture conceals a<br />
divergence <strong>in</strong> performance between revenues<br />
from copy sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The divergence is particularly marked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
case of regional papers, even when advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
revenue for free papers is excluded. The logical<br />
consequence of this is an <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
dependence on advertis<strong>in</strong>g, as illustrated <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 7.4.<br />
7.2 Circulation and cover prices<br />
Revenue from copy sales of course reflects two<br />
elements: circulation and cover price.<br />
Cover prices (Figures 7.5 and 7.6) have risen<br />
faster for regional papers than for nationals:<br />
39% aga<strong>in</strong>st 32% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1991-2000.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national press, <strong>the</strong> average cover<br />
price of popular titles <strong>in</strong>creased slightly faster<br />
than that of <strong>the</strong> qualities.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> circulation side, qualities have held up<br />
better than <strong>the</strong> circulation of ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> midmarket<br />
or mass market titles (Figures 7.7 and<br />
7.8) . On <strong>the</strong> face of it, this might <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />
competitive pric<strong>in</strong>g has succeeded <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
purchase, and <strong>the</strong> cut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> price of The Times<br />
has certa<strong>in</strong>ly had this effect. But <strong>the</strong>re are many<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r factors beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> circulation of<br />
<strong>the</strong> mass market titles, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
frequency of purchase, itself partly driven by <strong>the</strong><br />
sharp fall <strong>in</strong> home delivery. Over <strong>the</strong> period<br />
1993-2001 3.4m fewer people have a paper<br />
delivered on Mondays to Fridays, and 5.3m<br />
fewer on Sundays.<br />
Overall circulation of newspapers has recently<br />
been boosted by <strong>the</strong> creation of free daily<br />
metropolitan papers <strong>in</strong> London and o<strong>the</strong>r cities.<br />
Free newspaper distribution has been ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recently, even without <strong>the</strong> new free dailies<br />
(Figure 7.9).<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> type of advertis<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
we can see <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> higher growth <strong>in</strong><br />
classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g compared to display <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir share of revenues <strong>in</strong> 2000, compared with<br />
1991. In national newspapers <strong>the</strong> share of<br />
classifieds rose from 18.5% to 24.2%, while <strong>in</strong><br />
regionals (all papers, free and paid-for) it rose<br />
from 61.2% <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 66.7% <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
Of course, many of <strong>the</strong> highest circulation<br />
papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national market do not depend on<br />
classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g at all, but among <strong>the</strong><br />
broadsheets, some have important revenue<br />
streams from recruitment classifieds <strong>in</strong><br />
particular.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong> threat to classified revenues<br />
(both regional and national) from Internet-only<br />
competitors appears to have receded compared<br />
with two years ago, <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> Internet is<br />
ris<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> functionality of onl<strong>in</strong>e classifieds<br />
will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to improve relative to paper, so<br />
<strong>the</strong>re rema<strong>in</strong>s an issue. All <strong>the</strong> papers have<br />
taken defensive measures <strong>in</strong> relation to this<br />
issue, which will be discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
report. There is also a threat to <strong>the</strong>se revenues<br />
from free advertis<strong>in</strong>g ‘papers’, many of which<br />
are distributed from racks <strong>in</strong> large supermarket<br />
entrances.<br />
7.3 Number of titles<br />
The number of daily national titles has rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
stable s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995, while <strong>the</strong> number of Sunday<br />
papers has risen by two. The number of<br />
regional dailies and Sundays has risen, with <strong>the</strong><br />
daily titles boosted by <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> free<br />
Metros. Regional non-dailies have decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
number slightly, and <strong>the</strong> total number of free<br />
papers has also fallen, from 630 <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 581<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2000. In general, barriers to entry for<br />
newspapers are quite high, whereas it is<br />
reasonably cheap to launch a free, advertis<strong>in</strong>gonly<br />
‘paper’, which, although it conta<strong>in</strong>s no<br />
editorial, still represents a threat to <strong>the</strong><br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenues of papers that do ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />
editorial staffs. These sheets can quickly atta<strong>in</strong><br />
critical mass from an advertiser’s viewpo<strong>in</strong>t if<br />
<strong>the</strong>y can secure good distribution methods.<br />
38
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 7.1 Net revenues, all newspapers,<br />
current prices<br />
3500, £m<br />
• All nationals • All regionals<br />
Figure 7.3 Net revenue from advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
copy sales, regional paid-for newspapers<br />
2000<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g, paid for newspapers • Copy sales<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
1500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
500<br />
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999<br />
1991 1993 1995<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 7.2 Net revenue from advertis<strong>in</strong>g and copy<br />
sales, national newspapers<br />
2000, £m<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g • Copy sales 100, %<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Figure 7.4 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g as % of net revenues,<br />
regional papers<br />
1500<br />
80<br />
60<br />
1000<br />
40<br />
500<br />
20<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
><br />
39
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 7.5 Average cover prices<br />
50, pence<br />
40<br />
• Nationals • Regionals<br />
Figure 7.8 Regional newspapers,<br />
copies sold per annum<br />
2600, m<br />
30<br />
2400<br />
20<br />
2200<br />
10<br />
2000<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 7.6 Prices by market segment,<br />
national press<br />
Figure 7.9 Free newspapers distributed per annum<br />
70, pence<br />
• All qualities • All populars<br />
2000, m<br />
• Weeklies • Dailies<br />
60<br />
50<br />
1500<br />
40<br />
30<br />
1000<br />
20<br />
500<br />
10<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 7.7 Circulation of national dailies<br />
Figure 7.10 Employment <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
10000, thousands<br />
• Mass market • Mid market • Broadsheet<br />
80000<br />
8000<br />
60000<br />
6000<br />
40000<br />
4000<br />
20000<br />
1991 1993 1995<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
2001<br />
Source Labour Force Survey<br />
40
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 7.1 Regional pattern of employment<br />
All <strong>in</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry by region; not<br />
seasonally adjusted; United K<strong>in</strong>gdom; spr<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />
22.1 22.12:<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Newspaper<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 194780 67819<br />
Tyne & Wear 3801 2464<br />
Rest of North East 440 440<br />
Greater Manchester 1978 1493<br />
Merseyside 853 853<br />
Rest of North West 5256 1331<br />
South Yorkshire 1789 815<br />
West Yorkshire 4131 1735<br />
Rest of Yorkshire & Humberside 2533 2061<br />
East Midlands 8926 4368<br />
West Midlands<br />
Metropolitan County 6183 2832<br />
Rest of West Midlands 4718 3706<br />
East of England 24019 5749<br />
Inner London 31107 5057<br />
Outer London 29108 7160<br />
South East 34201 7307<br />
South West 13013 6136<br />
Wales 3947 2568<br />
Strathclyde 5783 3992<br />
Rest of Scotland 8578 4808<br />
Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 4416 2944<br />
Source Labour Force Survey<br />
7.4 Employment and related issues<br />
Figure 7.10 shows employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry as recorded by <strong>the</strong> Labour<br />
Force Survey. Data refers to <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g of each<br />
year. No clear trend is discernible. The<br />
variability is ma<strong>in</strong>ly a product of <strong>the</strong> very small<br />
sample sizes at this level of detail. That is to<br />
say, a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>dividual report<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y work<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector, or that <strong>the</strong>y no longer work <strong>in</strong> it, is<br />
reflected <strong>in</strong> large movements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reported<br />
total employment. The Newspaper Society<br />
collects some employment data for <strong>the</strong> regional<br />
press, but is not confident that its survey is truly<br />
representative. The Newspaper Publishers<br />
Association collects no employment data for <strong>the</strong><br />
national press. Official data from <strong>the</strong> employer<br />
side (Annual Employment Survey, Annual<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry) also shows variability. Industry<br />
representatives suggested that <strong>in</strong> recent years<br />
newspapers took on quite a lot of staff to<br />
develop electronic offer<strong>in</strong>gs and may<br />
subsequently have reduced <strong>the</strong>ir numbers,<br />
possibly account<strong>in</strong>g for part of <strong>the</strong> most recent<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases and decreases.<br />
The regional pattern of employment (Table<br />
7.1) differs from much of <strong>the</strong> rest of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g less centred on London and <strong>the</strong> South<br />
East, as would be expected. Whereas 48.5% of<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong><br />
South East, only 28.4% of newspaper<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is.<br />
><br />
41
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
7.5 Skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Skill levels <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g are<br />
generally high <strong>in</strong> management and editorial,<br />
but markedly less so <strong>in</strong> sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istration, and <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g (Table 7.2).<br />
This is especially <strong>the</strong> case when compared with<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, where 40% of sales and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
staff have higher or advanced qualifications,<br />
and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 33% have <strong>in</strong>termediate level<br />
qualifications, while 29% of advertis<strong>in</strong>g staff<br />
have higher or advanced level qualifications<br />
and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 38% have <strong>in</strong>termediate level<br />
qualifications.<br />
However, significantly higher percentages of<br />
newspaper employers have a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plan<br />
compared with magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers (64%<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st 40%) and only 5% of employers <strong>in</strong><br />
newspapers provide no tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, aga<strong>in</strong>st 11%<br />
of magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers.<br />
Only 8% of newspaper employers reported<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g hard-to-fill vacancies, compared with<br />
10% <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g as a whole (Table 7.3). The<br />
turnover rate <strong>in</strong> newspapers, at 15.9%, is also<br />
lower than <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g overall (22.4%).<br />
Table 7.2 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
No or Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />
low e.g. e.g. e.g. e.g.<br />
level O levels A levels degree postgraduate<br />
Management 2 2 18 68 8<br />
Editorial 1 4 25 64 4<br />
Support 1 22 64 11 1<br />
Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec 1 51 42 3 0<br />
Production 1 49 46 1 0<br />
Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
circulation 1 55 39 3 0<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 1 83 12 0 0<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 90 8 0 0 0<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
Table 7.3 Newspaper employers report<strong>in</strong>g<br />
skill shortages<br />
Employer report<strong>in</strong>g skill shortage, % 20<br />
Employer report<strong>in</strong>g no skill shortage, % 80<br />
Total 100<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
42
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 7.11 Purchases of services<br />
300, £m<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
Telecommunications<br />
Source ONS ABI<br />
Computers<br />
and related<br />
purchases<br />
Purchases of<br />
road transport<br />
• 1997 • 1998 • 1999<br />
Purchases of<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g services<br />
7.6 Productivity and costs<br />
Data from <strong>the</strong> Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry is only<br />
available from 1993, and <strong>the</strong>re is a break <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
consistency of <strong>the</strong> series <strong>in</strong> 1997, with some<br />
variables not available even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se years. The<br />
data that exists shows <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g trends <strong>in</strong><br />
output, productivity, <strong>in</strong>vestment and costs (with<br />
<strong>the</strong> caveats as mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> employment<br />
section above):<br />
• Turnover as a percentage of GDP appears<br />
to have slipped from 0.62% <strong>in</strong> 1995 to 0.56%<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1999<br />
• Turnover per employee rose by 15% between<br />
1993 and 1997, and <strong>the</strong>n by 8% between<br />
1998 and 1999<br />
• Employment costs rose sharply between 1993<br />
and 1997, but <strong>the</strong>n decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
• Capital expenditure decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> years<br />
1994 and 1995, rose <strong>in</strong> 1998 and <strong>the</strong>n<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>ed slightly.<br />
Figure 7.11 shows expenditure by newspaper<br />
companies (SIC 22.12) on some of <strong>the</strong> most<br />
important elements of <strong>the</strong>ir costs. Paper is not<br />
broken out separately <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABI data but trends<br />
<strong>in</strong> newspr<strong>in</strong>t prices were illustrated above.<br />
><br />
43
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
7.7 International comparisons<br />
The EU report referred to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g also compared <strong>the</strong> performance of<br />
newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g. The measures which it<br />
used as competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
newspaper sector were:<br />
• Circulation per 1000 population (Figure 7.12)<br />
• Titles per million<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue as % of GDP<br />
• Sales revenue as % of GDP<br />
• Turnover growth rate<br />
On <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong>se measures, which were<br />
weighted to give a total score, <strong>the</strong> UK, along<br />
with Denmark and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, occupied<br />
<strong>the</strong> highest rank. The UK scored higher <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to revenue, but somewhat lower <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to circulation and number of titles per<br />
million population than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two.<br />
The same report made some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />
comparisons between cost and revenue<br />
structures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries, albeit for 1997<br />
(Table 7.4).<br />
The figure for <strong>the</strong> UK does not equate to<br />
<strong>the</strong> net revenue numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Association data. If ad revenue from free<br />
newspapers is <strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
contribution amounts to 68% for 1997, and if<br />
only ad revenue from paid-for papers is<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>the</strong> figure is closer at 52%.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> cost side, <strong>the</strong> report gives <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 7.5.<br />
This shows considerable differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cost structures. Content and adm<strong>in</strong>istration and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g account for a higher proportion of<br />
costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK. This presumably reflects <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry does not have to spend as<br />
much as its European counterparts on pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(labour costs are lower) or on distribution – it is<br />
cheaper to distribute through <strong>the</strong> newstrade<br />
than via subscription-based home delivery,<br />
which is much more common <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
The chart (Figure 7.13) show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
comparisons of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue accru<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
newspapers shows that UK newspapers are<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share better than most of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational counterparts.<br />
44
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 7.12 Circulation per 1000 population<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
Figure 7.13 Newspaper share of<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />
80, %<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
• 1996 • 2000<br />
10<br />
UK<br />
Denmark<br />
Source EU Commission<br />
Germany<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Sweden<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
France<br />
Italy<br />
EU average<br />
UK<br />
US<br />
Germany<br />
Source World Press Trends<br />
France<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Sweden<br />
Italy<br />
Japan<br />
Table 7.4 Revenue structure differences <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> EU newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, 1997<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Circulation sales<br />
contribution<br />
contribution<br />
to turnover, % to turnover, %<br />
Belgium 51.6 48.4<br />
Denmark 61.8 38.2<br />
Germany 66.9 33.1<br />
Greece 51.0 49.0<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 43.9 56.1<br />
France 50 50<br />
Ireland 44.5 55.5<br />
Luxembourg 47.2 52.8<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 65.9 34.1<br />
Austria 67.1 32.9<br />
Portugal 31.7 68.3<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 53.3 46.7<br />
Sweden 55.4 44.6<br />
UK 58.9 41.1<br />
Average 55.5 44.5<br />
Source EU Commission<br />
Table 7.5 Cost structure of selected newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustries,<br />
% of total, 1997<br />
1.1.1.2 Content Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Distribution<br />
and paper and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
UK 40 20 28 12<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 23.2 31 21.4 23.4<br />
Germany 23.2 35.4 21.6 19.8<br />
France 16-22 25-35 22-33 10-25<br />
Source EU Commission<br />
45
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
8<br />
Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
8.1 Activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es divide broadly <strong>in</strong>to consumer and<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es. They not only<br />
have different end-user groups, but different<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, levels of brand extension and<br />
distribution methods. Data specifically referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es will be<br />
considered toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next section, as many,<br />
although not all, of <strong>the</strong> companies <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
produce across <strong>the</strong> range of bus<strong>in</strong>ess media,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, newsletters,<br />
databases and events.<br />
Statistics on <strong>the</strong> consumer part of <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess are more comprehensive than those<br />
on <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess side, but we are rely<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry data ra<strong>the</strong>r than official statistics <strong>in</strong><br />
this segment as <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition ‘journals and<br />
periodicals’ is not helpful <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es per se.<br />
However, some data on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry will be<br />
presented which crosses <strong>the</strong> divide: namely<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial data (as many companies are engaged<br />
<strong>in</strong> both consumer and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g) and data relat<strong>in</strong>g to skill<br />
levels and skill shortages. This is presented at<br />
<strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> consumer section. International<br />
comparisons will also be presented here.<br />
8.2 Revenues<br />
The revenue from consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es, like<br />
newspapers, comes from two ma<strong>in</strong> sources:<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and copy sales. The trends <strong>in</strong><br />
expenditure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are shown <strong>in</strong> Figures 8.1<br />
and 8.2.<br />
It can be seen from <strong>the</strong> data on advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
expenditure that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> revenue source and<br />
growth area has been <strong>in</strong> display advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than classifieds. Magaz<strong>in</strong>es are<br />
attempt<strong>in</strong>g to enhance <strong>the</strong>ir appeal to<br />
advertisers <strong>in</strong> a number of ways. Individual<br />
companies that possess a range of titles that<br />
appeal to different age, gender and <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
groups are able to offer advertisers ‘one stop<br />
shops’. If <strong>the</strong>y also have radio stations and<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e and digital TV <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y can<br />
offer cross-media deals, although <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
currently more high-profile examples of this <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> US than here e.g. AOL-Time Warner,<br />
Proctor and Gamble. On an <strong>in</strong>dustry wide basis,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are currently trials of an advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trad<strong>in</strong>g system, pioneered by <strong>the</strong> Periodical<br />
Publishers’ Association, which aims to make it<br />
much easier for advertisers to <strong>in</strong>vite bids, book<br />
ads, and eventually deal with <strong>in</strong>voices and<br />
payments electronically. This is designed to<br />
overcome <strong>the</strong> disadvantages of hav<strong>in</strong>g to deal<br />
with many titles, as well as reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative burden on sales staff and cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
down <strong>the</strong> level of rout<strong>in</strong>e disputes over whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
or not advertisements were booked.<br />
8.3 Copy sales and cover prices<br />
In terms of spend<strong>in</strong>g on magaz<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> picture<br />
has been one of remarkable growth,<br />
with a recent levell<strong>in</strong>g off.<br />
Clearly this expenditure results from a<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> cover prices and<br />
<strong>the</strong> numbers of copies sold.<br />
The trend <strong>in</strong> copies sold (Figure 8.3) reveals<br />
that after growth to 1996, sales have been<br />
decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g somewhat. Cover prices have risen<br />
quite substantially (Figure 8.4), from 72.3 pence<br />
<strong>in</strong> 1991 to 133.4 pence <strong>in</strong> 2000. In constant<br />
1995 prices (Figure 8.5), <strong>the</strong> average price per<br />
copy rose from 80.8 pence <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 116.8<br />
pence <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />
46
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 8.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />
Figure 8.4 Price trends<br />
800, £m<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
• Classified • Display • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
160, pence<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 8.2 Purchasers’ spend<strong>in</strong>g on magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Figure 8.5 Net revenue by source<br />
2000, £m<br />
200, £m<br />
• From advertis<strong>in</strong>g • From copy sales • Total<br />
1500<br />
150<br />
1000<br />
100<br />
500<br />
50<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Figure 8.3 Sales of conventional<br />
consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
1500, m<br />
1200<br />
900<br />
600<br />
300<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
><br />
47
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
8.4 Titles and launches<br />
The appeal of magaz<strong>in</strong>es and <strong>the</strong> launch of new<br />
titles (Figures 8.6 and 8.7, which have a higher<br />
than average price) has managed to persuade<br />
consumers to keep spend<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are some signs of a slowdown. Titles, and even<br />
whole categories, can now show patterns of<br />
boom and bust, perhaps reveal<strong>in</strong>g a more fickle<br />
and less brand loyal readership.<br />
New title launches are widely regarded as a<br />
major driver of market expansion, although also<br />
a source of difficulty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g generat<strong>in</strong>g large amounts of waste<br />
(with environmental implications).<br />
It’s too soon to say what <strong>the</strong> real trend is <strong>in</strong><br />
launches, but <strong>the</strong> concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and changes <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits (see Section<br />
16.4) certa<strong>in</strong>ly pose a threat to future launch<br />
activity, especially from smaller publishers or<br />
new entrants.<br />
Figure 8.6 Titles produced<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
1991 1993 1995<br />
Source BRAD<br />
Figure 8.7 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e launches<br />
800<br />
700<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
600<br />
Table 8.1 Life cycle <strong>in</strong>dicators, % changes,<br />
year on year, sales volumes<br />
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
All titles 0.5 2.1 1.1 -0.6 -0.5<br />
Constant titles 0.2 -1.6 -2.0 -4.0 -3.3<br />
Constant and<br />
dead titles -2.6 -3.6 -3.1 -4.3 -3.9<br />
200<br />
100<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
1997<br />
1999<br />
Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
48
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 8.8 Chang<strong>in</strong>g retail shares of<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e sales<br />
60, %<br />
50<br />
40<br />
• 1995 • 2001<br />
8.5 Returns and wastage<br />
In <strong>the</strong> year 2000, <strong>the</strong> level of waste at <strong>the</strong> retail<br />
level was estimated at 27% and that at <strong>the</strong><br />
wholesale level 3%. This apparently worsen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trend is partly due to some magaz<strong>in</strong>es be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
moved from firm sale to sale or return, and<br />
partly to better monitor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
30<br />
20<br />
Table 8.2 Returns (Waste – level of returns, %)<br />
1990 1994 1995-99 2000 2nd half<br />
2000<br />
10<br />
CTN<br />
Convenience store<br />
Grocery<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Petrol stations<br />
Figure 8.9 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers activities<br />
100, %<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Websites<br />
Specials<br />
List rental<br />
Books<br />
Title sp<strong>in</strong>-offs<br />
Personal products<br />
CD-ROM products<br />
Travel po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
Database mgt<br />
Fairs/events<br />
Source PPA, Develop<strong>in</strong>g Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e brands (2001)<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
Exhibitions<br />
20 30 29-31 30 32<br />
Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
8.6 Sales channels<br />
The majority of magaz<strong>in</strong>es are sold to<br />
consumers through retail outlets ra<strong>the</strong>r than by<br />
subscription (Figure 8.8), with 89% of sales via<br />
retail and 11% by subscription <strong>in</strong> 2000,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Periodical Publishers’<br />
Association.<br />
8.7 Brand extension<br />
Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have engaged<br />
<strong>in</strong> a variety of brand extension activities,<br />
illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 8.9. While some are clearly<br />
seen as almost <strong>in</strong>dispensable (such as a<br />
website), o<strong>the</strong>rs, like sp<strong>in</strong>-off merchandise,<br />
are m<strong>in</strong>ority activities. Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not a title<br />
will support an exhibition, for example,<br />
depends very much on <strong>the</strong> size and type<br />
of readership. Opportunities for platform<br />
extensions (web, digital TV) are discussed <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> digital section of Part 2.<br />
It may be worth not<strong>in</strong>g here that <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers we spoke to all told us that<br />
brand extension activities support brand<br />
recognition and <strong>the</strong>refore are often helpful <strong>in</strong><br />
buttress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e’s position, but <strong>the</strong>y do<br />
not represent serious revenue streams. This<br />
can be because <strong>the</strong> activity is undertaken on a<br />
publishers’ behalf by a contractor under licence,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce mak<strong>in</strong>g clo<strong>the</strong>s or cosmetics, or even<br />
putt<strong>in</strong>g on exhibitions is not <strong>the</strong> core<br />
competence of <strong>the</strong> publisher. Database or list<br />
rental activities might be <strong>the</strong> exception to this<br />
generalisation <strong>in</strong> terms of revenue generation.<br />
49
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
8.8 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
A major growth area of consumer publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> last few years has been <strong>the</strong> production of<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es under contract, often to major<br />
companies such as retailers, supermarkets,<br />
airl<strong>in</strong>es, membership organisations and so on,<br />
and usually for free distribution to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
customer or membership base (Figure 8.10).<br />
This is part of an overall drive by organisations<br />
to build customer loyalty and <strong>in</strong>crease brand<br />
strength. Traditional magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have<br />
exploited this new market and advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agencies have also become big players as an<br />
extension of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r brand build<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />
<strong>the</strong>y undertake for clients.<br />
8.9 Pan-magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector data<br />
8.9.1 Skill levels and skill shortages<br />
In common with o<strong>the</strong>r areas of publish<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
<strong>in</strong>deed even more so <strong>in</strong> some respects,<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g employees have very high<br />
levels of qualifications, reflect<strong>in</strong>g its desirability<br />
as an occupation (Table 8.3).<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers were slightly poorer at<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g than were publishers overall<br />
(Table 8.4). At <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> Skills Foresight<br />
report survey, <strong>the</strong>y also faced <strong>the</strong> highest level<br />
of hard-to-fill vacancies, at 15% compared with<br />
10% <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g overall. Difficulty <strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />
vacancies is also much more problematic <strong>in</strong><br />
London than elsewhere. The staff turnover rate<br />
<strong>in</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>es at 31.1% was much higher than <strong>in</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g overall (22.4%).<br />
Figure 8.10 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g agency turnover<br />
250, £m<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
1991<br />
1993<br />
1995<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
Table 8.3 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
1997<br />
Table 8.4 Skill shortages and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Skill shortages<br />
1999<br />
No or Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />
low e.g. e.g. e.g. e.g.<br />
level O levels A levels degree postgraduate<br />
Management 5 6 13 61 14<br />
Editorial 5 4 15 63 8<br />
Support 4 12 41 31 4<br />
Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec 7 19 42 22 3<br />
Production 6 15 33 34 2<br />
Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
circulation 6 12 33 38 2<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 5 14 38 27 2<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 14 10 28 41 0<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
Employer report<strong>in</strong>g skill shortage, % 12<br />
Employer report<strong>in</strong>g no skill shortage, % 88<br />
Total 100<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Employers with tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plan,% 40<br />
Employers with tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g budget, % 52<br />
Provides on and off job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, % 56<br />
Provides off job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only, % 9<br />
Provides on job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only, % 23<br />
Provides nei<strong>the</strong>r, % 11<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r, all publish<strong>in</strong>g, % 10<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
50
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
8.9.2 Profitability<br />
Indications of profitability and productivity are<br />
drawn from only <strong>the</strong> largest companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, as reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir reports and<br />
accounts and analysed by Prospect Shop.<br />
This data shows an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sales per<br />
employee but a slight fall <strong>in</strong> profit and return<br />
on capital. The rise <strong>in</strong> capital per employee is<br />
quite marked.<br />
Table 8.5 F<strong>in</strong>ancial data (based on lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
150 companies, but actually drawn from<br />
112 that filed)<br />
1997-98 1998-99 1999-00<br />
Return on capital 36.6 33.2 28.8<br />
Pretax profit marg<strong>in</strong> 12.7 11.4 11.2<br />
Profit per £ of pay 0.82 0.73 0.69<br />
Return on <strong>in</strong>vestment 33.9 30.4 25.2<br />
Stocks/sales 2.0 2.0 1.9<br />
Pay per employee, £ 19359 20861 22283<br />
Sales per employee, £000 124 131 136<br />
Capital employed per<br />
employee, £000 44 46 54<br />
Exports/sales 13.4 12.7 11.2<br />
Debt/net worth 103.6 85.4 80<br />
Source The Prospect Shop<br />
8.9.3 International comparisons<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Figures 8.11 and 8.12 shows<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles <strong>in</strong> different countries, <strong>in</strong> total<br />
and per million population, which shows <strong>the</strong><br />
relatively large number produced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK,<br />
which outperforms <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r major magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
produc<strong>in</strong>g countries (US, Germany and France)<br />
on a per capita basis.<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK do not manage to<br />
secure as high a proportion of <strong>the</strong> available<br />
ad spend as several of <strong>the</strong>ir European<br />
counterparts (Figure 8.13).<br />
The study on EU publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
competitiveness, referred to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> newspapers<br />
and books sections above, uses a number of<br />
variables to rank <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustries of<br />
member states, illustrated <strong>in</strong> Table 8.7. It ranks<br />
only <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries of France, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
and Germany <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest level. The UK falls<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> next highest, presumably on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />
of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and issue readership.<br />
The study identifies a regional group<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> UK, France and Germany, whose<br />
strengths are:<br />
• The consumer title segment<br />
• The ability to develop strong <strong>in</strong>ternational titles<br />
• Good postal distribution systems<br />
Weaknesses <strong>in</strong> this region are:<br />
• Ris<strong>in</strong>g production and distribution costs<br />
• Saturated domestic markets<br />
This latter po<strong>in</strong>t would probably be disputed<br />
by UK publishers. In our <strong>in</strong>terviews we asked<br />
all <strong>the</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers if <strong>the</strong>y<br />
believed that <strong>the</strong>re were too many magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
and <strong>the</strong>y all said that <strong>the</strong> market was always<br />
evolv<strong>in</strong>g, giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to new opportunities.<br />
However, it is a function of <strong>the</strong> market’s maturity<br />
that new titles will tend to grow at <strong>the</strong> expense<br />
of o<strong>the</strong>rs, and <strong>the</strong>re is some evidence that new<br />
titles are not grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market as much as<br />
<strong>the</strong>y used to.<br />
The table on distribution structure shows very<br />
clearly <strong>the</strong> unusually strong role that retail plays<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e distribution structure<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK and conversely, <strong>the</strong> unusually high<br />
rate of subscriptions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> prevalence of controlled<br />
circulation models <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK compared with,<br />
for example, Germany, results <strong>in</strong> a very high<br />
level of subscription <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK compared with<br />
Germany, but it is not out of l<strong>in</strong>e with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries.<br />
><br />
51
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Figure 8.11 International comparisons of<br />
title numbers<br />
Figure 8.13 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e share of total<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend<br />
France<br />
Germany<br />
Italy (1999)<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Sweden<br />
UK<br />
US<br />
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000<br />
• Consumer<br />
• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />
Sweden<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
Italy<br />
Germany<br />
France<br />
UK<br />
Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />
Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />
Figure 8.12 Titles per million<br />
0 100 200 300 400 500<br />
France<br />
Germany<br />
Italy (1999)<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land<br />
Sweden<br />
UK<br />
US<br />
Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />
Table 8.7 EU competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
Titles Advertis<strong>in</strong>g, Average issue Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
per million % of GDP readership growth rate revenue<br />
per title<br />
UK 108 0.147 86.5 30.3 0.198656<br />
Denmark 136 0.0681 98.5 30.5 0.313502<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 515 0.103 97 21 0.034458<br />
France 47 0.189 95.2 28.7 0.765442<br />
Germany 76 0.193 96.5 28.4 0.501871<br />
Italy 177 0.106 71.4 25.5 0.186361<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 303 0.261 97.7 0.9 0.151069<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 58 0.122 55.2 39.8 0.262224<br />
Sweden 52 0.081 90 1.8 0.297931<br />
EU average 126 0.128 79 22.5 0.280405<br />
Source Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> EU <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />
Table 8.8 Structure of distribution<br />
Consumer<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess/professional<br />
Subscription Retail Subscription Retail<br />
UK 11 89 90 10<br />
US 84 16 n.a n.a.<br />
France 31.3 68.7 93.5 6.5<br />
Germany 48 52 78 22<br />
Italy 27 73 n.a. n.a.<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 5.5 94.5 95 5<br />
Sweden 70 30 n.a n.a.<br />
Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />
52
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
9<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media<br />
9.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
9.1.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(Figure 9.1) shows a faster growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
classified segment than <strong>in</strong> display. Classified ad<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g rose from 28% of <strong>the</strong> total <strong>in</strong> 1991 to<br />
40% by 2000.<br />
Several publishers said <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> strategic<br />
goal of mov<strong>in</strong>g as many of <strong>the</strong>ir ‘free’<br />
subscribers on to a pay<strong>in</strong>g basis as possible<br />
and diversify<strong>in</strong>g revenue streams. One lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
B2B publisher told us:<br />
“We are look<strong>in</strong>g to convert a proportion from<br />
free to paid for whenever <strong>the</strong> opportunity<br />
presents itself. Traditional page advertis<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
weaken<strong>in</strong>g, it is a vulnerable revenue stream.”<br />
9.1.2 Number of titles<br />
The number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles has been<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g until very recently. Some titles have<br />
been hit by <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> technology and<br />
telecoms sector, for example. The data <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 9.2 shows <strong>the</strong> much greater number of<br />
titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector than <strong>in</strong> consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
9.1.3 Circulation<br />
A different estimate, conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> World<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends, for <strong>the</strong> total number of<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es sold and distributed <strong>in</strong><br />
2000 came to a fairly astonish<strong>in</strong>g 6050 million.<br />
Table 9.1 Total circulation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess press<br />
titles, m copies<br />
1995 1998<br />
Controlled circulation 196 210<br />
Paid-for 88 90<br />
Total 284 300<br />
Source Keynote<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Table 9.2 shows circulation and<br />
number of titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top 10 sectors, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Audit Bureau of Circulation.<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es have a wider sale<br />
beyond national borders than consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, which tend to <strong>in</strong>ternationalise by<br />
means of sett<strong>in</strong>g up editions elsewhere or<br />
licens<strong>in</strong>g formats to o<strong>the</strong>rs for use. The differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
export shares are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 9.3.<br />
9.1.4 Diversification of revenues<br />
Some very useful ‘snapshot’ <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g was conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study. This shows <strong>the</strong><br />
sheer numbers of companies engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
sector and <strong>the</strong> number of titles produced, which<br />
greatly exceeds <strong>the</strong> estimate from BRAD used<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chart above. It also shows <strong>the</strong> extent to<br />
which bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers are us<strong>in</strong>g electronic<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g to provide editorial content.<br />
The revenue breakdown also shows<br />
diversification. Although copy sales and<br />
especially advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> various forms<br />
Table 9.2 Segment circulation<br />
Top 10 bus<strong>in</strong>ess sectors Sector circulation, Sector circulation, No. of titles, No. of titles,<br />
June 2000 June 2001 2000 2001<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess management 990,130 1,221,916 51 61<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ance and <strong>in</strong>vestment 420979 469269 32 36<br />
Accountancy 421681 395088 10 10<br />
Market<strong>in</strong>g 246306 404776 15 22<br />
Agriculture 467657 362454 15 11<br />
Architecture 20458 284902 12 15<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g 225548 242468 19 20<br />
Medical 387125 385898 12 13<br />
Personnel Management 202448 209959 4 4<br />
W<strong>in</strong>es and spirit trade 173649 207205 11 11<br />
Total 3,555,981 4,183,935 181 203<br />
Source ABC<br />
54
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 9.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e survey data<br />
No. of companies 700<br />
No. of titles (magaz<strong>in</strong>es and journals) 10,000<br />
Turnover, £m 3,300<br />
Employees 29,000<br />
Revenue per title, £ 114,000<br />
% of companies publish<strong>in</strong>g only bus<strong>in</strong>ess or<br />
professional titles 76<br />
% publish<strong>in</strong>g more than 50 titles 5<br />
% of companies report<strong>in</strong>g that all <strong>the</strong>ir titles provide<br />
some electronic editorial content 40<br />
% of o<strong>the</strong>r companies report<strong>in</strong>g that more than<br />
50% of <strong>the</strong>ir titles provide some electronic<br />
editorial content 8<br />
% of titles distributed free of charge to targeted<br />
readership 70<br />
Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Figure 9.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure:<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
1500<br />
1200<br />
900<br />
600<br />
300<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
1996<br />
• Display • Classified • Total<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Figure 9.2 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles<br />
6000, number of titles<br />
• Consumer titles • Bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
2000<br />
Source BRAD<br />
Figure 9.3 Share of exports <strong>in</strong> circulation<br />
15%<br />
* Bus<strong>in</strong>ess category excludes<br />
UK-based <strong>in</strong>ternational titles<br />
12<br />
9<br />
6<br />
3<br />
Consumer titles<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles*<br />
Source ABC<br />
><br />
55
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
constitute <strong>the</strong> vast bulk of revenue, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
a significant element from electronic and from<br />
<strong>the</strong> ‘o<strong>the</strong>r’ category.<br />
The range of activities undertaken by<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers is shown <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 9.4.<br />
Unlike consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers,<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers emphasised <strong>the</strong> importance<br />
both of <strong>the</strong> diverse revenue streams and <strong>the</strong><br />
extent to which <strong>the</strong> brand of <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
acted as <strong>the</strong> validat<strong>in</strong>g umbrella for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
activities. Some publishers felt that it was vital<br />
to be present <strong>in</strong> all areas (magaz<strong>in</strong>es, direct<br />
mail, directories, events) <strong>in</strong> order to offer<br />
advertisers <strong>the</strong> choice of appropriate ways<br />
to reach <strong>the</strong>ir customers:<br />
“We try to have a magaz<strong>in</strong>e, directory and<br />
event <strong>in</strong> every sector. We try to see markets <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> round and offer advertisers exactly <strong>the</strong> mix<br />
<strong>the</strong>y want – <strong>the</strong>y will best judge whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y<br />
want to use events, direct mail or pr<strong>in</strong>t for a<br />
campaign and we want to be able to give <strong>the</strong>m<br />
that choice. We can sell <strong>the</strong>se as a package.<br />
We don’t get our divisions to compete with each<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r but to collaborate to give <strong>the</strong> customer<br />
(advertisers) what <strong>the</strong>y’re look<strong>in</strong>g for. The brand<br />
of <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e is extended and it is <strong>the</strong> brand<br />
which gives <strong>the</strong> advertiser <strong>the</strong> confidence to go<br />
with us, as <strong>the</strong>y know that <strong>the</strong> prestige of <strong>the</strong><br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e brand will be conferred on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
elements, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are exhibitions,<br />
conferences or awards. Because <strong>the</strong> brand<br />
gives confidence to <strong>the</strong> (ultimate) consumer, it<br />
gives confidence to <strong>the</strong> advertiser.”<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that synergies may be overstated:<br />
“There’s lots of talk about <strong>the</strong> need to have a<br />
directory, show, magaz<strong>in</strong>e, etc, <strong>in</strong> each sector<br />
but I’m not conv<strong>in</strong>ced that drives revenues.”<br />
However, that did not underm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> basic<br />
proposition that <strong>the</strong> brand was crucial and that it<br />
was desirable to have many different revenue<br />
streams, whe<strong>the</strong>r electronic, pr<strong>in</strong>t or eventbased.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r specialist publisher of<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and directories told us:<br />
“Ideally we would like to have a portfolio of<br />
products for each market, but sometimes where<br />
we have a magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>re is already a<br />
Figure 9.4 Activities of bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers<br />
100, %<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Websites<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>ted directories<br />
Contract publications<br />
List rental/sales<br />
Sponsored publications/<br />
advertorials<br />
Awards/events<br />
Conferences<br />
Exhibitions<br />
Source PPA, B2B Media: Opportunities for growth (2001)<br />
800<br />
600<br />
Table 9.4 Revenue sources, %<br />
1000, £m, current prices<br />
1992<br />
1994<br />
Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Newsletters<br />
CD-ROM products<br />
Hard copy subscriptions 17<br />
Display advertis<strong>in</strong>g 43<br />
Recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g 9<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r classified 8<br />
Inserts 4<br />
Electronic 5<br />
Newstrade 3<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 11<br />
Total 100<br />
Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Figure 9.5 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> directories<br />
2000<br />
56
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
compet<strong>in</strong>g directory or where we have a<br />
directory and a magaz<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong>re’s already a<br />
strong exhibition. We try to expand <strong>in</strong> areas<br />
where we have someth<strong>in</strong>g already but we had<br />
lots of bits and pieces that didn’t add up. We<br />
have spent some time <strong>in</strong> last five years tidy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>m up, divest<strong>in</strong>g some, acquir<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>rs, etc.”<br />
9.2 Directories<br />
9.2.1 Nature of directories<br />
Directories fall <strong>in</strong>to two broad categories: firstly,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s bus<strong>in</strong>ess location type of<br />
directory, which is free to <strong>the</strong> user and relies<br />
on ubiquity of distribution to drive advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
revenue. They will often list all <strong>the</strong> companies<br />
or organisations free <strong>in</strong> order to guarantee<br />
comprehensiveness and <strong>the</strong>n sell bigger<br />
placement advertis<strong>in</strong>g to companies wish<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
draw greater attention to <strong>the</strong>ir entries.<br />
Secondly, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> more specialist<br />
directory. Directories of <strong>the</strong> latter type can<br />
clearly be more or less general <strong>in</strong> content – <strong>the</strong>y<br />
may refer to all public companies <strong>in</strong> a country,<br />
or to all <strong>the</strong> companies produc<strong>in</strong>g particular<br />
types of equipment or services. These<br />
directories often rely on copy sales revenue as<br />
well as advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue, and some<br />
directories do not take advertis<strong>in</strong>g at all. Even<br />
where <strong>the</strong>re is no advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> directory<br />
itself, <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> it can constitute a valuable<br />
resource to firms wish<strong>in</strong>g to target o<strong>the</strong>r firms <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 9.5 Directory publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey results<br />
Revenue, £m 1,464<br />
Employees 20,000<br />
Turnover per employee, £ 75,000<br />
Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
that sector, and so <strong>the</strong>re is a bus<strong>in</strong>ess model <strong>in</strong><br />
list rental and so on. A powerful niche can be<br />
created <strong>in</strong> a particular <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector that acts<br />
to br<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r providers and users of<br />
products and services. Clearly, directories are<br />
hard to separate from databases, and electronic<br />
versions of directories are a natural extension<br />
and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly are replac<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ted versions.<br />
They are easier to keep up to date and more<br />
functional for <strong>the</strong> user. Many directory<br />
companies clearly are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forefront of us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technology to hold content <strong>in</strong> a format-neutral<br />
way to use <strong>in</strong> a number of different ways.<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 9.5 and Tables 9.5 and 9.6<br />
show <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue performance of<br />
<strong>the</strong> sector, driven ma<strong>in</strong>ly by <strong>the</strong> Yellow <strong>Page</strong>stype<br />
of directory, and <strong>the</strong>n snapshot data from<br />
<strong>the</strong> BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study and from<br />
<strong>the</strong> survey of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry carried out by<br />
K<strong>in</strong>gston University for <strong>the</strong> Directory Publishers’<br />
Association. Data from this survey which is of<br />
particular <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> sources of<br />
revenues by format/activity.<br />
><br />
57
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
Table 9.6 Directory <strong>in</strong>dustry survey data<br />
Results from K<strong>in</strong>gston University/DPA surveys (based on 32 usable<br />
responses from a sampl<strong>in</strong>g frame of 164 – too low to be generalisable)<br />
Turnover category, % of respondents (number of<br />
respondents varies)<br />
1998 1999 2000<br />
Small (up to £2.8m) 60 66 69<br />
Medium (£2.9m-£11.2m) 0 3 3<br />
Large (£11.2m+) 9 9 9<br />
No response 31 22 19<br />
Number of employees category, % of<br />
respondents (number of respondents varies)<br />
1998 1999 2000<br />
0 to 5 28 35 25<br />
6 to 10 25 28 25<br />
11 to 20 9 9 19<br />
21 to 50 16 19 22<br />
Subtotal 78 91 91<br />
Above 50 6 6 9<br />
No response 16 3 0<br />
Average turnover per employee, £ 132,000<br />
Average turnover per title, £ 196,000<br />
Firms by number of titles, % of respondents<br />
(number of respondents varies)<br />
1998 1999 2000<br />
1 to 5 38 47 44<br />
6 to 10 31 22 16<br />
11 to 20 6 16 22<br />
Sub total 75 85 82<br />
Above 20 12 12 15<br />
No response 13 3 3<br />
NB same title may be sold <strong>in</strong> a number of different media<br />
Sales revenue by medium,% of turnover<br />
1998 1999 2000<br />
Data sales<br />
Hard copy 71 67 63<br />
CD ROM 16 17 16<br />
Internet 0 2 8<br />
Mail<strong>in</strong>g labels/lists 3 3 3<br />
Data on disk 5 5 5<br />
Subtotal, all data sales 95 94 94<br />
Ad sales<br />
Hard copy 5 6 5<br />
CD ROM 0
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 9.7 Newsletters and<br />
management reports<br />
Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey results<br />
Number of companies <strong>in</strong>volved 270<br />
% with newsletters, etc, as primary activity 20<br />
Employees 12,500<br />
Turnover, £m 271<br />
% publish<strong>in</strong>g exclusively for bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />
professional market 72<br />
% publish<strong>in</strong>g between 2 and 10 titles 48<br />
% publish<strong>in</strong>g between 10 and 50 titles 36<br />
% publish<strong>in</strong>g some editorial electronically 55<br />
% of titles with electronic editorial content 22<br />
Total circulation, million 11<br />
Percentage with fewer than 10,000 subscribers 58<br />
% with fewer than 1000 subscribers 26<br />
% of companies offer<strong>in</strong>g multiple subscription<br />
deals/site licences 57<br />
Breakdown of revenues, %<br />
Hard copy subscriptions 40<br />
Display advertis<strong>in</strong>g 11<br />
Recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g 3<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r classified 4<br />
Inserts 14<br />
Electronic 7<br />
Newstrade 3<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 18<br />
Total 100<br />
Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
9.3 Newsletters and reports<br />
There is no regularly collected data on <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g of newsletters, but <strong>the</strong> data from <strong>the</strong><br />
BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study shows that<br />
this is an important segment of publish<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
although for <strong>the</strong> vast majority of companies, this<br />
is not <strong>the</strong>ir primary activity. Twenty-six percent<br />
have fewer than 1000 subscribers, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
newsletters can be a high value activity for<br />
niche markets. Electronic distribution is also<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g more important, as would be<br />
expected for a medium which is based on<br />
reach<strong>in</strong>g a tightly def<strong>in</strong>ed bus<strong>in</strong>ess audience<br />
with up-to-date news and analysis.<br />
Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees argued that <strong>the</strong><br />
commoditisation of news through <strong>the</strong><br />
proliferation of free sources of news and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> web were likely to spell a<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> newsletter publish<strong>in</strong>g. But this was<br />
not widely felt. Aga<strong>in</strong>st this, high value targeted<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation was still seen as greatly <strong>in</strong> demand,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> web and email as a more effective way<br />
of deliver<strong>in</strong>g it. There is also an expectation that<br />
as onl<strong>in</strong>e-only news and <strong>in</strong>formation services<br />
dw<strong>in</strong>dle, so will <strong>the</strong> free competition to paid<br />
content. But clearly, newsletters that fail to add<br />
significant value are at risk.<br />
The barriers to entry to newsletter publish<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
especially on <strong>the</strong> web and via email, are very<br />
low. The data below will not capture many of <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses, which may be very small <strong>in</strong>deed.<br />
Email market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> sale of lists, and<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g embedded with<strong>in</strong> email newsletters<br />
have been seen as one of <strong>the</strong> more effective<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, certa<strong>in</strong>ly compared<br />
with banner advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Many non-publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses are also us<strong>in</strong>g regular email<br />
newsletters as a means of client contact, but<br />
<strong>the</strong>se are not generally revenue-generat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves, but more a means of prompt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
site visits.<br />
59
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
9.4 Onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation vendors<br />
This segment of <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong>cludes both pure<br />
aggregators and <strong>the</strong> owners of content who also<br />
operate aggregation services distribut<strong>in</strong>g thirdparty<br />
content. The opportunities presented by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet more generally are presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />
While <strong>the</strong>re are a lot of players <strong>in</strong> specific<br />
areas (e.g. Derwent for patents, Dun &<br />
Bradstreet for company <strong>in</strong>formation, Chemical<br />
Abstracts) <strong>the</strong>re has been a considerable<br />
concentration <strong>in</strong> this market <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last few<br />
years, with three major bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
vendors emerg<strong>in</strong>g: Thomson (which acquired<br />
Dialog), Reed Elsevier’s Lexis Nexis, and<br />
Factiva, which is a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture between<br />
Reuters and Dow Jones. In STM, <strong>the</strong> major<br />
players are Wolters Kluwer, Elsevier Science<br />
and Thomson, as well as John Wiley.<br />
One reason for actually nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se players<br />
is that o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong>re is a good deal of<br />
confusion about what constitutes this segment:<br />
after all, <strong>the</strong> vast majority of bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM<br />
publishers now operate onl<strong>in</strong>e services. These<br />
players tend to be dist<strong>in</strong>guished by size, global<br />
reach, and <strong>the</strong>ir role as <strong>in</strong>termediaries as well<br />
as content orig<strong>in</strong>ators. Their core competences<br />
of <strong>in</strong>formation handl<strong>in</strong>g, database management<br />
and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration of technological functionality<br />
with content also mark <strong>the</strong>m out as be<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g edge of what is <strong>the</strong> future for much of<br />
<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole. They have<br />
also been <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forefront of try<strong>in</strong>g to forge close<br />
relationships with <strong>the</strong>ir end users. Some of<br />
<strong>the</strong>m, notably Factiva and Thomson, are also<br />
mov<strong>in</strong>g rapidly to becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
solutions companies, as are newer web-based<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>termediaries such as Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
Table 9.8 European onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation market, £m, currrent prices<br />
2000 2001<br />
UK 283 297<br />
% share 39.4 38.9<br />
France 135 140<br />
% share 18.8 18.3<br />
Germany 122 137<br />
% share 17 17.9<br />
Scand<strong>in</strong>avia 57 61<br />
% share 8 8<br />
Italy 56 59<br />
% share 7.8 7.7<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs 65 70<br />
% share 9 9.2<br />
Total 718 764<br />
Source The European Onl<strong>in</strong>e Information Market, Jan 2002, IRN<br />
for Learned Information<br />
Light. Thomson’s purchase of filter<strong>in</strong>g service<br />
NewsEdge is one <strong>in</strong>dication of this, while<br />
Factiva has developed its own software and<br />
tools for <strong>in</strong>formation management, which it is<br />
offer<strong>in</strong>g to client companies. Information<br />
vendors are mov<strong>in</strong>g away from <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess most <strong>in</strong> danger of impact from <strong>the</strong><br />
proliferation of free onl<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>in</strong>to higher<br />
value-added services. In a recent survey, 75%<br />
of bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation professionals reported<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g fee-based services less than before<br />
because of <strong>the</strong> availability of free <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
The data <strong>in</strong> table 9.8 shows that <strong>the</strong> UK is <strong>the</strong><br />
largest market for onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
consumption <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
Overall, <strong>the</strong> market for onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />
Europe amounted to £984m <strong>in</strong> 2001, up 6% on<br />
2000. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g legal,<br />
accounted for 77.6% and STM for <strong>the</strong> rest.<br />
60
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
10<br />
The Internet<br />
10.1 Opportunities and threats<br />
The advent of <strong>the</strong> World Wide Web runn<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet offered many opportunities and<br />
threats to <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. Because <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry was caught slightly off-guard, it was put<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a position of panic, respond<strong>in</strong>g to threats<br />
that arose from all corners of <strong>the</strong> globe, while<br />
seek<strong>in</strong>g to generate revenues and profits similar<br />
to that from its traditional bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Luckily for<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> threat subsided for many<br />
reasons and most traditional publishers are now<br />
<strong>in</strong> a stronger position. What have been <strong>the</strong><br />
lessons learned and how should <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
proceed from here?<br />
The Internet is a daily part of most people’s<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g lives and has penetrated some 40% of<br />
our homes. The power of <strong>the</strong> World Wide Web<br />
is only just be<strong>in</strong>g realised and major<br />
developments will cont<strong>in</strong>ue for a considerable<br />
time to come. The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has<br />
almost entirely embraced <strong>the</strong> Web and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
Internet protocols for market<strong>in</strong>g purposes and<br />
part of it has developed sophisticated new<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess models. As a market<strong>in</strong>g tool, <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet has proved very effective and a great<br />
help to smaller publishers <strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
markets.<br />
The web and o<strong>the</strong>r new services cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />
to br<strong>in</strong>g new opportunities and new players to<br />
market. Many companies are f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves ‘publish<strong>in</strong>g’ on <strong>the</strong> Internet <strong>in</strong> new<br />
ways to reach <strong>the</strong>ir customers. Even <strong>the</strong><br />
Government has found itself more visibly<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g data and <strong>in</strong>formation. This may<br />
broaden <strong>the</strong> scope of publish<strong>in</strong>g, but does<br />
not redef<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. It provides publishers<br />
with an opportunity to exploit new revenue<br />
sources, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g professional services to<br />
companies and organisations whose focus<br />
needs to be elsewhere.<br />
The move towards gett<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g services<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> corporate world has been started and<br />
some major UK publishers, such as Pearson<br />
and Reed-Elsevier, have demonstrated an<br />
ability to service multiple markets us<strong>in</strong>g medianeutral<br />
content as well as gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
workflow of corporate customers. These most<br />
likely will be fur<strong>the</strong>r developed, although <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess models will need to be developed<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r and strategic alliances and partnerships<br />
may be needed.<br />
10.2 Newspapers<br />
National newspapers were among <strong>the</strong> first<br />
publishers to embrace <strong>the</strong> web. They have<br />
created a variety of onl<strong>in</strong>e services, some<br />
based around, but extend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted titles,<br />
such as FT.com, and o<strong>the</strong>rs built more around<br />
<strong>the</strong>matic areas, such as Associated<br />
Newspapers’ Femail, and thisismoney.co.uk.<br />
Some mass market newspapers have s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
significantly downgraded <strong>the</strong>ir Internet<br />
presence, such as Express Newspapers and<br />
<strong>the</strong> popular News International titles (former<br />
Express owners UNM and at one time, News<br />
International, were shareholders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ISP<br />
L<strong>in</strong>eOne, while The Sun also established<br />
and <strong>the</strong>n sold an Internet ISP and portal,<br />
entitled The Bun). Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror also had an<br />
ambitious national and local Internet strategy<br />
with ISP/portal ic24, which survives <strong>in</strong> its<br />
regional form.<br />
Regional newspapers have created sites<br />
around <strong>the</strong> geographical locations <strong>the</strong>y serve,<br />
and also <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as Newsquest’s<br />
Communigate, which acts as a host for<br />
community groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local area to have an<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e presence. Local shopp<strong>in</strong>g sites have<br />
also been launched, allow<strong>in</strong>g smaller local<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses (a pillar of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g base of<br />
<strong>the</strong> papers) to get onl<strong>in</strong>e under <strong>the</strong> auspices of<br />
<strong>the</strong> newspaper. Crucially, five of <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
groups also collaborated to establish a national<br />
classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g service, called Fish4. This<br />
has been important <strong>in</strong> defend<strong>in</strong>g newspapers’<br />
classified revenues, whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US <strong>the</strong><br />
major newspaper groups have failed to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
a workable co-operative model).<br />
10.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es have taken varied approaches to <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet. In <strong>the</strong> case of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, it was embraced as a major<br />
opportunity to extend <strong>the</strong> brands of <strong>the</strong><br />
62
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>to a new medium, someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that ran hand <strong>in</strong> hand with exist<strong>in</strong>g brand<br />
extensions, for example <strong>in</strong>to directories,<br />
exhibitions, conferences and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. For a<br />
time, it also presented threats <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of<br />
new, well-funded onl<strong>in</strong>e-only competitors, such<br />
as <strong>the</strong> B2B exchanges and so-called ‘vortals’<br />
which <strong>in</strong>tended to act as news and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
portals for vertical <strong>in</strong>dustries, with or without<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ks to transactional services. This presented<br />
two threats: (<strong>the</strong>oretically) dis<strong>in</strong>termediation of<br />
directories and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and (actually) <strong>the</strong><br />
loss of skilled staff attracted by <strong>the</strong> promise of<br />
share options <strong>in</strong> dot.com bus<strong>in</strong>esses. A small<br />
specialist publisher told us:<br />
“The Internet is still <strong>the</strong>re as an opportunity.<br />
Three years ago we would have seen it as a<br />
huge threat. We faced serious challenges from<br />
well-funded new entrants. For a time we lost<br />
staff to dot.coms and it was a very competitive<br />
time for us. They had access to very cheap<br />
capital, but luckily <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess models ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
failed. Traditional publishers had to use cash<br />
flow to fund <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The staff issue was<br />
<strong>the</strong> biggest threat, but pushed us towards<br />
issu<strong>in</strong>g share options and mak<strong>in</strong>g bigger efforts<br />
to motivate staff, so <strong>in</strong> some ways it was good.”<br />
Clearly <strong>the</strong>se onl<strong>in</strong>e-only <strong>in</strong>itiatives have<br />
largely collapsed, although <strong>the</strong>re are legacies<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>in</strong>dustry-run B2B exchanges <strong>in</strong><br />
a number of <strong>in</strong>dustries. Many magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers had to <strong>in</strong>vest heavily <strong>in</strong> Internet<br />
services and <strong>the</strong> hoped-for revenue streams,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e advertis<strong>in</strong>g and even share of<br />
transactions (which sites like UBM’s Farmgate<br />
at one time anticipated) have not <strong>in</strong> general<br />
materialised. Lead<strong>in</strong>g B2B publishers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Emap, Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information and UBM are<br />
still deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> consequences, although all<br />
still see <strong>the</strong> Internet as an important channel of<br />
communication with <strong>the</strong> customer and as a<br />
potential revenue earner, particularly through<br />
added-value niche bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
services. One publisher told us:<br />
“All of us are clear<strong>in</strong>g up after <strong>the</strong> big party.<br />
We are cutt<strong>in</strong>g back to <strong>the</strong> core bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />
try<strong>in</strong>g to work out what to do about <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
offer<strong>in</strong>g. There is not much growth out <strong>the</strong>re<br />
and we mostly went up a bl<strong>in</strong>d alley with onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
There will be more consolidation and more<br />
cost cutt<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r commented:<br />
“We have fewer companion websites than we<br />
did. The means of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ad revenue onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
have not proved effective. Banners, buttons,<br />
etc, are too <strong>in</strong>trusive, like ads on teletext, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
get <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way of what <strong>the</strong> user is <strong>the</strong>re for.<br />
Revenue has to be based on subscriptions, and<br />
that means hav<strong>in</strong>g high value content that<br />
extends beyond <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>e. One<br />
paid service that we have launched has had<br />
high take up. It’s not just updates on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t –<br />
it’s high value new bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation.”<br />
10.4 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
The picture here is aga<strong>in</strong> diverse. Some of <strong>the</strong><br />
biggest publishers, such as IPC, launched major<br />
web <strong>in</strong>itiatives, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> general lifestyle area<br />
with women’s sites (BeMe) and men’s sites<br />
(Uploaded) and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
focused area, with acclaimed sites such as <strong>the</strong><br />
New Scientist’s. In <strong>the</strong> heavily contested music<br />
and travel segments magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers aga<strong>in</strong><br />
faced onl<strong>in</strong>e-only competition (or <strong>in</strong> some cases,<br />
outlets for content) <strong>in</strong> all k<strong>in</strong>ds of forms, as sites<br />
offer<strong>in</strong>g MP3 files and fan sites mushroomed,<br />
and travel <strong>in</strong>termediaries with content and news<br />
were major areas for web <strong>in</strong>vestment. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
publishers refra<strong>in</strong>ed from mak<strong>in</strong>g big<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments and largely conf<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>mselves to<br />
reproduc<strong>in</strong>g covers of <strong>the</strong> latest issues and<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g subscription <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> web.<br />
Leav<strong>in</strong>g content aside for a moment, it is also<br />
clear that <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e channel represents a<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ite opportunity to <strong>in</strong>crease subscriptions<br />
to pr<strong>in</strong>t products, to ease <strong>the</strong> crucial process<br />
of renewal and to transfer some of <strong>the</strong><br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istration of subscriptions to <strong>the</strong> consumer.<br />
There is considerable evidence from <strong>the</strong> US to<br />
support this, although of course, subscriptions<br />
are a much higher proportion of sales <strong>the</strong>re than<br />
here. A British publisher, Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, has<br />
also had considerable success <strong>in</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
subscriptions to <strong>the</strong> US edition of Maxim via ><br />
63
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet. For a fuller discussion of<br />
subscriptions, see <strong>the</strong> customer focus section.<br />
In common with mass market newspapers,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re has been a retreat from <strong>the</strong> Web on <strong>the</strong><br />
part of consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers, with<br />
high-profile sites be<strong>in</strong>g closed or sold.<br />
One publisher of specialist titles told us:<br />
“The Internet should be an opportunity for some<br />
specialised titles, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for commerce and<br />
classifieds, e.g. travel and books, but it’s tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a long time to take off. It is quite hard to<br />
monetise it. For most <strong>in</strong>terests, <strong>the</strong>re is a natural<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e community, but <strong>the</strong>re’s masses<br />
of stuff available on <strong>the</strong> Web from libraries,<br />
universities, etc. The danger is that your site<br />
just becomes a signpost. No-one is spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
any money at any po<strong>in</strong>t, so how can you get<br />
a share of it?”<br />
By contrast, a publisher of magaz<strong>in</strong>es aimed<br />
at car buyers and male electronics purchasers<br />
told us that <strong>the</strong> Internet:<br />
“Is very significant for us. One of our sites is<br />
profitable on <strong>the</strong> basis of sell<strong>in</strong>g display<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g content from it on to<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r sites. It also generates pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
subscriptions.”<br />
A report by consultants McK<strong>in</strong>sey, published<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> McK<strong>in</strong>sey Quarterly 1st Quarter 2001,<br />
summed up <strong>the</strong> dilemma fac<strong>in</strong>g many magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers:<br />
“Many magaz<strong>in</strong>es fall between <strong>the</strong> available<br />
choices: <strong>the</strong>y spend a lot of money build<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
complete website and end up with one too<br />
costly to be a companion site but not compell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
enough to attract <strong>the</strong> high traffic and revenue of<br />
a dest<strong>in</strong>ation site. Resources are wasted, and<br />
readers are unhappy; people who are<br />
passionate about <strong>the</strong>ir magaz<strong>in</strong>es expect <strong>the</strong><br />
Web version to be as good as its pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
counterpart, and if a site billed as a dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
experience fails to live up to those expectations,<br />
<strong>the</strong> chances of success fall and <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
risks los<strong>in</strong>g valuable pr<strong>in</strong>t subscribers.”<br />
Some of <strong>the</strong> same arguments apply to<br />
so-called ‘mas<strong>the</strong>ad’ programm<strong>in</strong>g, that is,<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e-branded television programm<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
discussed below.<br />
Recently, mobile has emerged as an<br />
important platform/threat for teen magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
with text messag<strong>in</strong>g absorb<strong>in</strong>g ever <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
amounts of time and money <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> teen and<br />
even pre-teen age groups.<br />
10.5 Books<br />
As has already been mentioned, <strong>the</strong>re are a<br />
number of ways <strong>in</strong> which book publishers have<br />
embraced <strong>the</strong> Internet. For academic and STM<br />
publishers it has become fundamental. It is a<br />
major opportunity for <strong>the</strong>m to create arrays of<br />
new services that meet <strong>the</strong> demands of<br />
academic, research and library users. One<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g academic publisher told us:<br />
“I am a big believer <strong>in</strong> server-side e-books<br />
(NetLibrary, ebrary, 24 by 7, etc). The ability to<br />
search across <strong>the</strong> field and cross-refer is what<br />
libraries want and what users want. But <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess model’s still unclear – many pioneers<br />
have gone bust.”<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>t on demand is also a big opportunity,<br />
especially <strong>in</strong> this segment, as it allows<br />
publishers to keep books <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t that would<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rwise be uneconomic. However, <strong>the</strong> need<br />
to clear third party rights before us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
content <strong>in</strong> this manner was described to us as<br />
“a potential show-stopper”. Of course, as time<br />
goes on, publishers will be secur<strong>in</strong>g rights to<br />
use content <strong>in</strong> this way – or at least attempt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to do so.<br />
64
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
11<br />
Analysis of gaps <strong>in</strong> data sources<br />
11.1 General comments<br />
Given <strong>the</strong> analysis of methodological issues,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> identified need to measure productivity<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector, <strong>the</strong> most serious gaps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
data are for total turnover and value-added, and<br />
agreed estimates of global employment with<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> sector and sub-sectors, which would allow<br />
some calculation of sales or value-added per<br />
employee. An additional severe gap is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
number of companies operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector<br />
and sub-sectors, for which estimates vary<br />
extremely widely. This variable (and accurate<br />
size distribution <strong>in</strong>formation) is crucial to <strong>the</strong><br />
ability to conduct statistically valid surveys.<br />
11.2 Official versus unofficial statistics<br />
It is notable that <strong>the</strong> official statistics do attempt<br />
to measure <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of variables that are useful<br />
for analys<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness, but <strong>the</strong> problem<br />
with <strong>the</strong>se is that <strong>the</strong>y do not def<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> a way that encompasses all <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />
activities, and sub-sectors are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ways<br />
that amalgamate activities that are subject to<br />
different market dynamics. Some of <strong>the</strong> subsectors,<br />
notably newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g, are fairly<br />
well def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> official data and <strong>the</strong>refore it<br />
is possible to use <strong>the</strong> official data for some<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicators. It will be necessary to rely on<br />
aggregated 2-digit official data (publish<strong>in</strong>g as a<br />
whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIC def<strong>in</strong>ition) to some extent. This<br />
is <strong>in</strong> spite of <strong>the</strong> fact that it does not fully match<br />
<strong>the</strong> activity def<strong>in</strong>ition – for example, activities<br />
such as exhibitions and conferences,<br />
databases, news agencies and ‘advertis<strong>in</strong>grelated<br />
activities’ are scattered throughout <strong>the</strong><br />
Standard Industrial Classification – simply<br />
because <strong>the</strong>re isn’t anyth<strong>in</strong>g else available. It<br />
has <strong>the</strong> advantage of hav<strong>in</strong>g long consistent<br />
series properly collected on a sound<br />
methodological basis.<br />
Many variables are also available at <strong>the</strong><br />
4-digit level, which will cover book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g quite well, but <strong>the</strong><br />
third category, which encompasses ‘journal and<br />
periodical publish<strong>in</strong>g’, is much less satisfactorily<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s po<strong>in</strong>t of view.<br />
The unofficial statistics tend to be strong <strong>in</strong><br />
measur<strong>in</strong>g variables that help companies to<br />
measure <strong>the</strong>ir market share, or <strong>the</strong> performance<br />
of particular media aga<strong>in</strong>st o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sales revenue, number of titles,<br />
and circulation. Even here <strong>the</strong>re are problems<br />
of coverage, especially <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> sub-sectors,<br />
such as <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess press.<br />
11.3 Sub-sectors<br />
11.3.1 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Huge variation <strong>in</strong> estimates of <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
publishers with a 10-fold difference <strong>in</strong> official<br />
data and unofficial estimates.<br />
• Problems with employment data. No regular<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry source and data from <strong>the</strong> Labour<br />
Force Survey differs substantially from <strong>the</strong><br />
AES data. This limits <strong>the</strong> possibility of<br />
calculat<strong>in</strong>g productivity measures with any<br />
degree of confidence.<br />
• Sales revenue – unofficial data is improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
but it is necessary to use PRODCOM data<br />
until this becomes available.<br />
• No regular data concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> level of stock<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. There is a one-off figure <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> KPMG report ‘Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />
Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize’.<br />
• F<strong>in</strong>ancial data e.g. return on sales. There is<br />
some partial data based on <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g firms.<br />
• As already noted, <strong>the</strong> trade data does not fully<br />
reflect <strong>the</strong> globalised nature of <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />
• A critical gap is <strong>the</strong> lack of data on revenues<br />
from licens<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> sale of rights, which is<br />
an extremely important element <strong>in</strong> book<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />
In general, <strong>the</strong>re is a lot of data which<br />
companies use <strong>in</strong>ternally to measure <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
performance, but which is not publicly available<br />
for analysis, <strong>in</strong> some cases because it is<br />
regarded as confidential.<br />
11.3.2 Newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Official data maps reasonably well onto<br />
<strong>the</strong> sector, so <strong>the</strong>re are fewer gaps than <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r areas.<br />
• But <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions of newspapers and journals<br />
66
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
and periodicals used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> official statistics<br />
splits <strong>the</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> a way that does not reflect<br />
<strong>the</strong> split between nationals and regionals,<br />
which is quite crucial <strong>in</strong> some respects. For<br />
this, unofficial data is necessary and here<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are gaps, notably <strong>in</strong> terms of reliable<br />
employment data.<br />
11.3.3 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• No regular updated employment data.<br />
• No agreed and cont<strong>in</strong>uously collected data<br />
on <strong>the</strong> number of publishers – large tail of<br />
small publishers <strong>in</strong> consumer, one-off data<br />
for bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
• Official data comb<strong>in</strong>es journals and periodicals<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some newspapers) toge<strong>the</strong>r and<br />
does not dist<strong>in</strong>guish consumer from bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g, which have<br />
very different dynamics and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />
These are becom<strong>in</strong>g more pronounced ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than less as <strong>the</strong>y grasp <strong>the</strong> opportunities<br />
presented by digital media. For example, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is no regular data captur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
important brand extension activities of B2B<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers.<br />
• Sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue figures are<br />
reliable for consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es but much<br />
less is available for bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
periodicals. For example, no net revenue<br />
data is calculated.<br />
11.3.4 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• The Publishers Association (PA) and <strong>the</strong><br />
Association of Learned and Professional<br />
Society Publishers have both carried out<br />
surveys <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past, and are collaborat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
produce decent <strong>in</strong>formation, but this has been<br />
hampered by <strong>the</strong> unwill<strong>in</strong>gness of <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
publishers to respond to surveys.<br />
• Official data comb<strong>in</strong>es journals and<br />
periodicals.<br />
11.3.5 Database and directory publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• There is a small amount of snapshot<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation available from <strong>the</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Information Forum’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
study and from a regular survey carried out for<br />
<strong>the</strong> Database Publishers’ Association by<br />
K<strong>in</strong>gston University.<br />
• There is a series of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue data<br />
compiled by <strong>the</strong> Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association.<br />
11.3.6 Newsletters<br />
• The only data is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study.<br />
><br />
67
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
11.4 Summary of def<strong>in</strong>itional issues and data gaps<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Newspapers<br />
Books<br />
Journals<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>itional issues<br />
Official data covers<br />
books, newspapers,<br />
journals and periodicals<br />
and some ‘o<strong>the</strong>r’<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g but not<br />
databases, news<br />
agencies, list rental,<br />
exhibitions, etc. No<br />
satisfactory def<strong>in</strong>ition yet<br />
exists – key requirement.<br />
For some purposes and<br />
at an <strong>in</strong>ternational (e.g.<br />
EU and OECD) level,<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g is still<br />
amalgamated with<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and even wood<br />
pulp and paper mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Official data splits<br />
newspapers on basis of<br />
frequency of publication<br />
<strong>in</strong>to newspapers and<br />
journals and periodicals;<br />
unofficial data splits by<br />
national and regional<br />
No major def<strong>in</strong>itional<br />
problems – though it can<br />
be difficult to weed out<br />
self-publishers and s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
book publishers, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to wide variations <strong>in</strong><br />
enterprise numbers.<br />
E-books, fragmentation of<br />
'<strong>the</strong> book' and Pr<strong>in</strong>t on<br />
Demand may <strong>in</strong> future<br />
throw up quantitative<br />
issues<br />
Official data merges all<br />
journals and periodicals<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r. Global nature of<br />
academic/STM bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
means it's important to<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>guish UK revenues,<br />
worldwide revenues of<br />
UK based publishers etc.<br />
New electronic products<br />
and aggregators need to<br />
be accommodated <strong>in</strong><br />
def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
Number of enterprises<br />
Official data agreed to be<br />
an underestimate<br />
Comparatively high<br />
concentration makes<br />
'universe' calculable for<br />
survey purposes. Good<br />
unofficial data<br />
No agreed data – official<br />
numbers c. 3000,<br />
unofficial 30,000-40,000<br />
Unofficial data on UK<br />
based publishers, but<br />
quite high range of<br />
numbers<br />
Turnover and net<br />
revenues<br />
No agreed total – official<br />
underestimates<br />
Both official and unofficial<br />
data exists<br />
Both official and unofficial<br />
data exists; unofficial data<br />
is improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Unofficial annual survey<br />
data; problems of nonresponse/<br />
unrepresentativeness<br />
Value added<br />
No agreed total – official<br />
underestimates<br />
Official data exists s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1993 but with gaps<br />
Official data exists s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1993<br />
No separate data<br />
Employment<br />
Labour Force Survey<br />
data likely to be closer to<br />
reality as it is self-def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by employee, but<br />
freelanc<strong>in</strong>g an issue<br />
Labour Force Survey<br />
data covers whole<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry but very small<br />
sample size makes for<br />
high variability from year<br />
to year<br />
Labour Force Survey<br />
data covers whole<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry but very small<br />
sample size makes for<br />
high variability from year<br />
to year<br />
No separate data<br />
Exports<br />
Need agreement on how<br />
to represent globalised<br />
nature of book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
quantitatively<br />
Need agreement on how<br />
to represent globalised<br />
nature of journal<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g quantitatively<br />
Rights and licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
Some data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> balance<br />
of trade <strong>in</strong> services<br />
No data<br />
No data – very significant<br />
gap<br />
Some data<br />
Investment<br />
Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
exists but what is really<br />
needed is a measure of<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
property<br />
Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
exists but what is really<br />
needed is a measure of<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
property<br />
Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
exists but what is really<br />
needed is a measure of<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
property<br />
No separate dat<br />
Entrepreneurship<br />
Entry and exit rates <strong>in</strong><br />
Annual Respondents<br />
Database but publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
merged with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Innovation<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded with<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and paper <strong>in</strong><br />
Community Innovation<br />
Survey<br />
Proxy: Number of new<br />
titles data<br />
Proxy: number of new<br />
titles data<br />
Proxy: number of new<br />
journals launched<br />
Environmental/<br />
wastage <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
No overall data<br />
No aggregate data<br />
Survey data on returns<br />
and estimates of pulp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– not regular<br />
No data<br />
68
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Directories<br />
Newsletters<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>itional issues<br />
Official data merges all<br />
journals and periodicals<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r. Also no split<br />
between consumer and<br />
B2B<br />
Official data merges all<br />
journals and periodicals<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r. Also no split<br />
between consumer and<br />
B2B. How ancillary<br />
revenues e.g.<br />
conferences, databases<br />
etc, be accounted for <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> official def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g overlap with<br />
databases, some titles<br />
exist <strong>in</strong> electronic form<br />
only and this will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
over time<br />
Many titles exist <strong>in</strong><br />
electronic form only and<br />
this will <strong>in</strong>crease over<br />
time. Low barriers to<br />
entry to email newsletters<br />
imply large number of<br />
small or microenterprises<br />
not captured<br />
<strong>in</strong> statistics<br />
Number of enterprises<br />
No agreed dat<br />
No agreed data<br />
Unofficial data<br />
No agreed data<br />
Turnover and net<br />
revenues<br />
Unofficial data on gross<br />
and net revenues<br />
Unofficial regular data on<br />
gross advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
revenue only, one-off<br />
survey data on total<br />
revenues<br />
Unofficial annual survey<br />
data; problems of nonresponse/unrepresentativ<br />
eness<br />
One off unofficial B2B<br />
survey data<br />
Value added<br />
No separate data<br />
No separate data<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Employment<br />
No separate data<br />
No separate data<br />
Annual survey data on<br />
number of employees<br />
per firm but can't be<br />
grossed up<br />
One off unofficial B2B<br />
survey data<br />
Exports<br />
Some unofficial data on<br />
percentage of sales<br />
Some unofficial data on<br />
percentage of sale<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Rights and licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Some survey data on<br />
ancillary revenues<br />
No data<br />
Investment<br />
No separate data<br />
No separate data<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Entrepreneurship<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Innovation<br />
Proxy: new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
launches<br />
Proxy: new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
launches<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
Environmental/<br />
wastage <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />
Source Pira<br />
Unofficial data – needs<br />
careful <strong>in</strong>terpretation to<br />
adjust for changed<br />
retail<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />
Very difficult – no returns<br />
on free magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
No data<br />
No data<br />
69
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
12<br />
Typology of publish<strong>in</strong>g products accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to brand and format characteristics<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g on from <strong>the</strong> discussion on brand<br />
extension <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sections on consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media,<br />
and look<strong>in</strong>g forward to <strong>the</strong> discussion on <strong>the</strong><br />
challenge of digital media <strong>in</strong> Chapter 17, we<br />
have drawn up a typology of pr<strong>in</strong>ted media<br />
products. This attempts to place different media<br />
products accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir brand strength and<br />
<strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong>y are format-neutral.<br />
12.1 Brand<br />
Brand becomes ever more important <strong>in</strong> a<br />
fragmented digital environment as a marker for<br />
users to f<strong>in</strong>d content <strong>the</strong>y can trust and want to<br />
use (and may pay for). It is also important to<br />
protect brands <strong>in</strong> environments where content<br />
is passed though new <strong>in</strong>termediaries and<br />
aggregators and to guard aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
commoditisation of content.<br />
12.2 Importance of format<br />
Format-neutrality is an <strong>in</strong>dicator of how far and<br />
fast different products will tend to move <strong>in</strong>to<br />
multiple channels and platforms. For some<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ted products, <strong>the</strong> format <strong>the</strong>y appear <strong>in</strong> is<br />
<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to <strong>the</strong>ir appeal, e.g. portability,<br />
disposability, <strong>the</strong> ability to cut pictures out, or<br />
share <strong>the</strong> product with o<strong>the</strong>rs easily. With<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> content itself is <strong>the</strong> primary sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t and its separation from <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
format may enhance its functionality. Some<br />
products will be equally useful <strong>in</strong> different<br />
formats, depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>ir mode of use, e.g.<br />
used <strong>in</strong> one form while <strong>the</strong> reader is on <strong>the</strong><br />
move, and ano<strong>the</strong>r when <strong>the</strong>y are at <strong>the</strong>ir desks<br />
or at home.<br />
The products are categorised by end-user:<br />
consumer, bus<strong>in</strong>ess, and <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />
(education/research).<br />
12.3 Consumer media<br />
Medium<br />
Book<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Broadsheets<br />
Mass market<br />
Regional and local<br />
newspapers<br />
Directories<br />
(e.g. Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s)<br />
Exhibitions and events<br />
Format characteristics<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal – at least until usability<br />
issues are resolved with screens and through<br />
generational change. Possible exceptions: reference<br />
works, travel guides and <strong>the</strong> like<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal, especially for glossies and<br />
teen/women’s weeklies. TV list<strong>in</strong>gs as well, although<br />
<strong>the</strong>y face migration to/competition from EPGs. Some<br />
buyer’s guide-type consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es are more<br />
format-neutral (PCs, cars, etc)<br />
Format somewhat neutral, but paper still <strong>the</strong><br />
fundamental format<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; but classifieds ga<strong>in</strong><br />
enormously <strong>in</strong> functionality from onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Format fluid. Paper products likely to persist for a<br />
long time as <strong>the</strong>y constitute a barrier to entry and<br />
many users prefer paper. Electronic confers greater<br />
functionality/updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; be<strong>in</strong>g present is <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t, although onl<strong>in</strong>e can be complementary <strong>in</strong><br />
publicis<strong>in</strong>g/ prepar<strong>in</strong>g events<br />
Brand characteristics<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ly resides with author; longevity varies. Where<br />
brand resides with impr<strong>in</strong>t or publisher, it is long lived<br />
Strong brands but may be relatively short-lived;<br />
some ephemeral (resembles FMCG); brand<br />
extension limited<br />
Strong, long-lived brands. Some opportunity to create<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked, differentiat<strong>in</strong>g brands through <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />
media<br />
Strong long lived brands; brand extension limited<br />
Most strong and long lived but advertisement-only<br />
papers can be weak and ephemeral. Opportunity to<br />
create l<strong>in</strong>ked but differentiat<strong>in</strong>g brands (e.g. thisis)<br />
Often very strong. Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s a generic brand as<br />
well as an actual one<br />
Some strong and long lived; o<strong>the</strong>rs weak and<br />
ephemeral<br />
70
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
12.4 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess media<br />
Medium<br />
Newspapers<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Newsletters<br />
Directories<br />
Exhibitions,<br />
conferences, events<br />
Databases, onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation services<br />
Format characteristics<br />
Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Functionality can be<br />
different but equal <strong>in</strong> paper and o<strong>the</strong>r formats<br />
Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats can add<br />
functionality especially where magaz<strong>in</strong>e is used for<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g/archive, etc. Nonpaper<br />
formats allow for updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats can add<br />
functionality especially for <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g/archive, etc. Non-paper formats allow for<br />
updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats have<br />
more functionality and are easily updated. Although<br />
some users will prefer paper, this will change over<br />
time. Paper likely to disappear<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; many are products of<br />
brand extension. Onl<strong>in</strong>e events lack network<strong>in</strong>g<br />
opportunities, although onl<strong>in</strong>e can be complementary<br />
<strong>in</strong> publicis<strong>in</strong>g/ prepar<strong>in</strong>g events<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal – important to <strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong><br />
technology and functionality constantly<br />
Brand characteristics<br />
Strong, long-lived<br />
Many are strong and long-lived but niches can be<br />
quickly overpopulated and <strong>the</strong> weak go to <strong>the</strong> wall<br />
Tend to be short lived<br />
Some long lived and strong; o<strong>the</strong>rs weak and<br />
ephemeral<br />
Fairly weak <strong>in</strong> many cases, although some exhibitions<br />
and events have extremely strong brands and are<br />
very long-lived<br />
Varies – e.g. Lexis, Reuters strong<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
Books (management,<br />
professional)<br />
Multi-format – USP is cost-effectiveness<br />
Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; added value services<br />
possible<br />
Highly variable<br />
Brand resides ma<strong>in</strong>ly with impr<strong>in</strong>t, occasionally with<br />
author<br />
12.5 Education and research market<br />
Medium<br />
Monograph<br />
Textbook<br />
Journal<br />
Format characteristics<br />
Content is ma<strong>in</strong> USP, though paper format may<br />
persist due to mode of use/portability. Usability issues<br />
have to be resolved (e-book readers, etc)<br />
Content is ma<strong>in</strong> USP: electronic formats can add<br />
functionality and updatability, but usability issues<br />
have to be resolved (e-book readers, etc)<br />
Content is USP. Electronic formats can add to<br />
functionality<br />
Brand characteristics<br />
Brand resides with author and impr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Brand resides with impr<strong>in</strong>t and sometimes author<br />
Brand resides with journal; publisher has brand if<br />
title belongs to <strong>the</strong>m but may belong to society or<br />
rarely, editorial board. Some danger of brand loss<br />
<strong>in</strong> aggregation services – author could become<br />
<strong>the</strong> brand<br />
71
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
13<br />
Strengths, weaknesses,<br />
opportunities and threats<br />
13.1 Introduction<br />
This section, analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> strengths,<br />
weaknesses and constra<strong>in</strong>ts, opportunities and<br />
threats fac<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g and its constituent<br />
parts, is based on our research, <strong>the</strong><br />
questionnaire responses, and <strong>in</strong>put from<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry representatives <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviews and focus group meet<strong>in</strong>gs. Ultimately,<br />
it is a product of Pira’s judgement.<br />
This SWOT analysis po<strong>in</strong>ts forwards to our<br />
deeper analysis of <strong>the</strong> challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 2, and to <strong>the</strong> Action<br />
Plan. However, not all of <strong>the</strong> identified<br />
weaknesses and threats, nor for that matter <strong>the</strong><br />
opportunities, will necessarily have an action<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t specifically attached to it – some action<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts, for example those concerned with <strong>the</strong><br />
adoption of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies, may<br />
address a whole series of <strong>the</strong> weaknesses<br />
and threats.<br />
The analysis has been made for sub-sectors<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, but <strong>the</strong>re is also an <strong>in</strong>troductory<br />
section which draws toge<strong>the</strong>r common factors<br />
across publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
13.2 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> – common strengths<br />
and issues<br />
Strengths<br />
• Use of English language <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />
• Highly qualified workforce<br />
• Core competences <strong>in</strong> selection, edit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and manipulation of <strong>in</strong>formation are<br />
extremely valuable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new knowledgebased<br />
economy<br />
• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
• Brands<br />
• Self regulatory regimes <strong>in</strong> place <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g, content and distribution<br />
(ASA,PCC,JIG)<br />
Weaknesses and constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
• Lack of sufficiently close knowledge or<br />
relationship with end customer<br />
• Uneven adoption of vital underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technologies to take advantage of<br />
opportunities<br />
• Competition laws and cross-media ownership<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts limit scale<br />
• Mature markets for pr<strong>in</strong>t products<br />
• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share of consumer time spent on<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t products<br />
• Lack of comprehensive statistics to assess<br />
performance<br />
• Lack of public profile as an <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
• Confused copyright licens<strong>in</strong>g structure<br />
• English language makes UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
vulnerable<br />
Threats<br />
• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation/re<strong>in</strong>termediation by nontraditional<br />
‘publishers’ and o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>terpos<strong>in</strong>g<br />
between publishers and <strong>the</strong>ir customers<br />
• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Commoditisation of some content<br />
• Skill shortages<br />
• Increased demands on consumers’ time and<br />
attention<br />
• Regulation of content and privacy laws<br />
• Competition from publicly funded bodies such<br />
as <strong>the</strong> BBC can stifle new markets<br />
Opportunities<br />
• Closer relationship with customers<br />
• Use of data about customers and relationships<br />
with <strong>the</strong>m to buttress advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and<br />
allow <strong>the</strong> creation of new and customised<br />
products and services<br />
• New services based on new non-pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
platforms and on digital pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g/pr<strong>in</strong>t on<br />
demand<br />
• Use of enabl<strong>in</strong>g e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong><br />
production/supply cha<strong>in</strong>/sales and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g/content management<br />
• International markets driven by use of English<br />
and empowered by new technologies<br />
72
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 13.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: perceived opportunities and threats<br />
over three and 10 years<br />
Opportunities<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />
overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />
create new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
0 50 100 150 200<br />
Threats<br />
Economic recession<br />
Technological change e.g. development of<br />
broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
Retention of rights by authors/<br />
agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
New entrants to your market<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong><br />
exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Stricter regulation<br />
Taxation changes<br />
Source Pira survey<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
provider/publisher<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
><br />
73
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
13.3 Books<br />
Strengths<br />
• Use of English language <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />
• Established companies with <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
networks<br />
• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
• Strengths <strong>in</strong> diverse sectors<br />
• Ability to source books from many different<br />
countries<br />
• High rate of title generation (see weaknesses)<br />
• Competitive pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Increas<strong>in</strong>gly educated population<br />
• Popularity of read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• More outlets for book sales – related to<br />
discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Highly attractive occupation to graduates<br />
• Relatively strong export performance,<br />
especially <strong>in</strong> ELT<br />
Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />
• Complexity of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Low brand strength – brand resides ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
with authors (some impr<strong>in</strong>ts and series<br />
excepted)<br />
• Fragmented<br />
• No direct contact with end customer (except<br />
book clubs)<br />
• Publishers push out titles ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
focused on sell<strong>in</strong>g – cha<strong>in</strong> is too supply driven<br />
not demand driven<br />
• More demands on consumers' time<br />
• Level of returns – but not high relative to US<br />
• Long tail of publishers slow to take up<br />
technological <strong>in</strong>novations<br />
• Low pay – strength if susta<strong>in</strong>able?<br />
• Talent gap at middle level emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Low spend<strong>in</strong>g on books <strong>in</strong> education<br />
• Low spend<strong>in</strong>g on books <strong>in</strong> public libraries,<br />
especially fiction<br />
• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement on <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
• Agents and authors reta<strong>in</strong> more rights <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to segment <strong>the</strong>m fur<strong>the</strong>r – may limit ability to<br />
<strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong> new platforms<br />
• Power of bestsell<strong>in</strong>g authors to dis<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Proliferation of leisure activities and media<br />
• Concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g/entry of US super<br />
retailers<br />
• Chang<strong>in</strong>g female aspirations and ambitions<br />
may reduce supply of graduates<br />
• End of <strong>the</strong> book writ<strong>in</strong>g culture (academic<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g only)<br />
Opportunities<br />
• Market dom<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy buyers/readers<br />
– only need to grow <strong>the</strong> market by a small<br />
marg<strong>in</strong> to get successful growth<br />
• Pr<strong>in</strong>t on demand – keeps books <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t, and<br />
as <strong>the</strong> title proliferation is ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong><br />
academic/niche/professional it allows<br />
publishers to make sales without carry<strong>in</strong>g cost<br />
• Internet booksellers allow much more<br />
exposure and sale of <strong>the</strong> backlist<br />
• Expand<strong>in</strong>g markets overseas due ma<strong>in</strong>ly to<br />
spread of English language<br />
• Tie-<strong>in</strong> opportunities aris<strong>in</strong>g from new leisure<br />
pursuits<br />
• E-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production<br />
process to drive efficiency/cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
underp<strong>in</strong> reuse of content across platforms<br />
• E-commerce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> to drive<br />
efficiencies/reduce costs<br />
• Closer relationship with customers, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CRM-type technologies<br />
• More exploitation of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights and<br />
ensur<strong>in</strong>g that ‘new’ rights are secured<br />
and used<br />
• E-books <strong>in</strong> some segments<br />
Threats<br />
• Erosion of territorial rights <strong>in</strong>creases threat of<br />
US competition<br />
• Piracy<br />
74
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 13.2 Books: perceived opportunities and threats<br />
over three and 10 years<br />
Opportunities<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />
overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />
new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Threats<br />
Economic recession<br />
Technological change e.g. development of<br />
broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
New entrants to your market<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Stricter regulation<br />
Taxation changes<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250<br />
Source Pira survey<br />
><br />
75
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
13.4 Journals<br />
Strengths<br />
• Subscription bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />
• At forefront of technological developments<br />
• No taxation of <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
• English language – for content sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
sales<br />
• Science and research base<br />
• Brand resides <strong>in</strong> journal (strength if owned)<br />
• Ability to cross-promote from one journal to<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
• Direct relationships with subscribers <strong>in</strong><br />
many cases<br />
Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />
• Inadequate fund<strong>in</strong>g of higher education and<br />
research<br />
• Inadequate fund<strong>in</strong>g of academic libraries<br />
• Brand resides <strong>in</strong> journal (weakness if owned<br />
by <strong>in</strong>stitution or society)<br />
• Hard to launch new titles – need to persuade<br />
customers to drop one to make room<br />
Threats<br />
• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by academics publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
direct <strong>in</strong> electronic journals<br />
• New <strong>in</strong>termediaries may <strong>in</strong>terpose between<br />
publishers and customers and command <strong>the</strong><br />
customer relationship and customer data<br />
• Inequitable taxation of electronic content and<br />
migration of activity to US<br />
• Cost of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g digital<br />
archive<br />
• Power of library customers<br />
• Electronic Inter-Library Loan<br />
• Dissolution of <strong>the</strong> journal as a package of<br />
articles – pay per item becomes prevalent<br />
(could also be an opportunity)<br />
• Concentration of ownership allows big players<br />
to squeeze out smaller ones through bundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r practices<br />
• Big players cause resentment among authors<br />
and customers<br />
• More aggressive use of patents limits content<br />
availability<br />
Opportunities<br />
• Electronic distribution br<strong>in</strong>gs down costs<br />
• New service offer<strong>in</strong>gs possible based on<br />
closer relationship with customer and new<br />
technologies<br />
• Dissolution of <strong>the</strong> journal as a package of<br />
articles – pay per item becomes prevalent<br />
• New fields of study open up and high degree<br />
of academic specialisation creates new journal<br />
possibilities (but difficult to sell without<br />
knock<strong>in</strong>g out ano<strong>the</strong>r title – budget constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />
power of library <strong>in</strong>termediaries)<br />
• Alliances between publishers and universities<br />
to create e-learn<strong>in</strong>g platforms<br />
76
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 13.3 Journals: perceived opportunities and threats<br />
over three and 10 years<br />
Opportunities<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />
overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />
new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Threats<br />
Economic recession<br />
Technological change eg development of<br />
broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
New entrants to your market<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Stricter regulation<br />
Taxation changes<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />
Source Pira survey<br />
><br />
77
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
13.5 Newspapers<br />
Strengths<br />
• Strong brands<br />
• High reach<br />
• Authoritative content (qualities)<br />
• Established distribution channels<br />
• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
• Strong newstrade distribution reduces costs of<br />
reach<strong>in</strong>g customers (compared with overseas<br />
counterparts)<br />
• Relationships with advertisers<br />
• Trust (regional and local)<br />
• Role of papers with<strong>in</strong> economy and society<br />
well established and understood<br />
• National daily papers are ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>sulated<br />
from <strong>in</strong>ternational competition<br />
• Many local papers do not compete directly<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> same market<br />
• Ad sales force has unparalleled local<br />
relationships with bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
• Portability<br />
• Competitive price<br />
• Low staff turnover<br />
Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />
• Mature market<br />
• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g circulation<br />
• Special competition regime on mergers and<br />
acquisitions limits ability to respond quickly to<br />
deal opportunities<br />
• Cross media ownership constra<strong>in</strong>ts limits scale<br />
and cross-platform exploitation of assets<br />
compared with books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
• High cost of production and distribution for<br />
physical product<br />
• EU employment and work<strong>in</strong>g time regulations<br />
make it more difficult to recruit and reta<strong>in</strong><br />
delivery workers<br />
• Greater reliance on advertis<strong>in</strong>g than a decade<br />
ago, especially recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Threats<br />
• Newspaper read<strong>in</strong>g habit dy<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong> younger<br />
generations<br />
• Grow<strong>in</strong>g competition for readers’ attention<br />
• Grow<strong>in</strong>g competition for advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g may migrate to Internet<br />
rivals or be dis<strong>in</strong>termediated i.e. advertisers<br />
separately or <strong>in</strong> groups reach customers<br />
directly via onl<strong>in</strong>e or o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>teractive media<br />
• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Public sector recruitment direct via Internet<br />
• Onl<strong>in</strong>e media br<strong>in</strong>gs o<strong>the</strong>r sources of news to<br />
consumers<br />
• News becom<strong>in</strong>g a commodity<br />
• Advertisers may cont<strong>in</strong>ue to shift budgets<br />
towards below <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e campaigns<br />
• Privacy laws could beg<strong>in</strong> to follow European<br />
model<br />
• Paper prices may rise faster than ability to<br />
raise cover prices<br />
• Price wars could recur<br />
• Decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> CTNs threatens home delivery and<br />
frequency of purchase<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g restrictions could <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
Opportunities<br />
• Fur<strong>the</strong>r consolidation<br />
• Pr<strong>in</strong>t format changes, partly enabled by digital<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g (more colour, more supplements,<br />
regionalisation and special editions) to drive<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and purchase frequency<br />
• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
ability to realise economies of scale (local<br />
papers shar<strong>in</strong>g content)<br />
• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
ability to reuse editorial content across<br />
different platforms<br />
• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies allows papers<br />
to make maximum use of <strong>the</strong>ir advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
content and data about advertisers and<br />
customers<br />
78
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
• E-commerce <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> (from advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to distribution) cuts costs, <strong>in</strong>creases efficiency<br />
• Use of <strong>in</strong>teractive and support<strong>in</strong>g technology<br />
to ga<strong>in</strong> a closer relationship with customers<br />
and build loyalty/subscriptions<br />
• Remote pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and o<strong>the</strong>r means of access to<br />
markets too distant to be cost effective<br />
currently<br />
• Local papers can become local <strong>in</strong>fo providers<br />
via <strong>in</strong>teractive media – brand extension<br />
• Local papers can acquire radio stations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
markets if regulation is loosened<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> newspapers papers may<br />
become more attractive as TV audiences<br />
fragment<br />
• Transactional possibilities through Internet<br />
(referral, e-commerce)<br />
• Broadband will <strong>in</strong>crease functionality of onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
classifieds (double-edged sword)<br />
• Polybagg<strong>in</strong>g presents an opportunity for<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased sales<br />
Figure 13.4 Newspapers: perceived opportunities and<br />
threats over three and 10 years<br />
Opportunities<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />
overseasmarkets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />
new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g,sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Threats<br />
Economic recession<br />
Technological change eg development of<br />
broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
New entrants to your market<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Stricter regulation<br />
Taxation changes<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Source Pira survey<br />
79
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
13.6 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
media and bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
Strengths<br />
• Diversity<br />
• Innovativeness<br />
• Strong brands<br />
• Relationships with advertisers<br />
• Strong newstrade distribution provides a costeffective<br />
route to market<br />
• Successful brand extension strategy,<br />
especially <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
• Niche nature of magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> tune with<br />
zeitgeist<br />
• Highly attractive occupation for graduates<br />
• Diversity of revenue streams<br />
• High value <strong>in</strong>formation (B2B, directories,<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation services)<br />
• Strong <strong>in</strong>termediary positions (B2B,<br />
directories)<br />
• Innovative technologies e.g. specialised tools<br />
(bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation services)<br />
• Subscription model (some magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess directories)<br />
• UK strength <strong>in</strong> search and taxonomic systems<br />
Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />
• New product launches vital but no longer<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market so much<br />
• Low level of subscriptions relative to foreign<br />
countries<br />
• Expense of postal service constra<strong>in</strong>s growth<br />
of subscriptions<br />
• Fragility of <strong>the</strong> postal service<br />
• Wastage is high – returns, new titles fail to<br />
reach targets<br />
• Hard for start ups to get seed capital<br />
• Exhibitions and events do not have access to<br />
cheap venues (relative to European<br />
competitors)<br />
Threats<br />
• Change <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits and decl<strong>in</strong>e of<br />
CTNs threatens smaller publishers, new<br />
launches, range of choice<br />
• National distribution would accelerate decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent retail outlets<br />
• Fragmentation of postal distribution<br />
• Environmental directives might <strong>in</strong>crease costs<br />
or even threaten some processes<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g restrictions could <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
• Directives on distance sell<strong>in</strong>g, data protection<br />
and cookies<br />
• Increas<strong>in</strong>g power of multiple retailers<br />
squeezes marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
• Age<strong>in</strong>g population presents challenges <strong>in</strong><br />
some markets (women’s and men’s lifestyle)<br />
• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation <strong>in</strong> some bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess segments especially directories<br />
• Competition from non-traditional sources<br />
e.g. law firms, banks, ad agencies<br />
• Competition for consumer time and attention<br />
• Exhibitions and events highly sensitive to<br />
economic climate<br />
• Public sector recruitment direct via Internet<br />
• UK Government and public sector and EU<br />
engage <strong>in</strong> value added publish<strong>in</strong>g (affects<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es and directories)<br />
• Availability of free content on <strong>the</strong> Web<br />
underm<strong>in</strong>es value proposition of some B2B<br />
and <strong>in</strong>formation services at <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> (affects<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
aggregators/onl<strong>in</strong>e services)<br />
• Concentration of ownership of premium<br />
80
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
content may affect pure aggregators <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
longer term<br />
Opportunities<br />
• New titles (magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories)<br />
• Consolidation<br />
• New services based on customisation and<br />
target<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Fur<strong>the</strong>r brand extension and diversification<br />
of revenue streams<br />
• Broadband/<strong>in</strong>teractive TV could spawn new<br />
services<br />
• Trend to niche <strong>in</strong>terests supports magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
new product development<br />
• Demand for specialised, high value bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation as competitive environment<br />
sharpens for all bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
• Sales/licens<strong>in</strong>g of formats abroad<br />
• Direct sales to overseas markets (directories,<br />
some bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es)<br />
• Remote short-run pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g allows new markets<br />
to be served cost effectively<br />
• Licens<strong>in</strong>g of brands to o<strong>the</strong>r media<br />
• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
ability to reuse content across different<br />
platforms<br />
• Use of advertis<strong>in</strong>g content and advertiser<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation to drive revenues<br />
• Added value services – <strong>in</strong>tegration with<br />
<strong>in</strong>tranets/EIPs (bus<strong>in</strong>ess media/bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation)<br />
• Taxonomy – development of new technologies<br />
and expertise <strong>in</strong> content categorisation and<br />
structure (bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
management services)<br />
Figure 13.5 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es: perceived opportunities and threats<br />
over three and 10 years<br />
Opportunities<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />
overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Threats<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />
new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />
order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />
Economic recession<br />
Technological change eg development of<br />
broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />
New entrants to your market<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />
changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Stricter regulation<br />
Taxation changes<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />
•<br />
3 years<br />
10 years<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Source Pira survey<br />
81
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
CHAPTER<br />
14<br />
Future scenarios<br />
14.1 Introduction<br />
The scenarios we have chosen to use are<br />
designed to describe several potential future<br />
circumstances with<strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry will be expected to operate. We also<br />
hypo<strong>the</strong>size about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s reaction to<br />
<strong>the</strong>se circumstances. This is done by describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> premise, <strong>the</strong> implications for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
and f<strong>in</strong>ally what <strong>the</strong> outcome for publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry is likely to be should <strong>the</strong> scenario<br />
occur. These scenarios are built us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> basic<br />
drivers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> forego<strong>in</strong>g evidence<br />
and <strong>the</strong> trends that we have presented earlier<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g a realistic picture.<br />
The shift towards a knowledge economy is<br />
not a s<strong>in</strong>gle change but a complex process that<br />
will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to unfold and create opportunities<br />
and challenges as it does so. Publishers will<br />
have to adapt to an environment that demands<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ual evolution of products, enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technologies, skills and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />
These scenarios are a simplified, and by no<br />
means exhaustive, representation of what will <strong>in</strong><br />
practice be a highly complex set of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trends and processes.<br />
14.2 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios<br />
In develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios we have considered<br />
<strong>the</strong> most significant drivers that can impact <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess of publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g five to 10<br />
years. The drivers <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> behaviour of<br />
people and companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchas<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g product and <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes towards<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g content or receiv<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
These drivers form <strong>the</strong> parameters which can<br />
be varied <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g differ<strong>in</strong>g scenarios. We<br />
have grouped <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>in</strong>to three ma<strong>in</strong> areas:<br />
lifestyle; work; technology and economy.<br />
14.2.1 Lifestyle<br />
Drivers around lifestyle <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• The competition for consumers time and<br />
money<br />
• The amount of time available for leisure<br />
activities<br />
• The requirements for easier access to<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• The population demographics shift<strong>in</strong>g towards<br />
an age<strong>in</strong>g population<br />
• The time spent shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• The effects of <strong>the</strong> desire for a higher “quality of<br />
life”<br />
• The effects of less time travell<strong>in</strong>g to work<br />
• The desire to better educate children<br />
14.2.2 Work<br />
Drivers around <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• More distant/home work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Ability to access <strong>in</strong>formation from anywhere<br />
at any time<br />
• Better <strong>in</strong>tegration of customer <strong>in</strong>formation with<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Faster decision mak<strong>in</strong>g based on better<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation available<br />
• More mobility of workforce<br />
• More <strong>in</strong>ternational workforce as employment<br />
laws are relaxed fur<strong>the</strong>r and EU expands<br />
14.2.3 Technology<br />
Drivers around technology <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• The adoption by <strong>the</strong> public of new network<br />
services such as broadband, wireless and<br />
digital television<br />
• The adoption by publishers of technology to<br />
improve current bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes<br />
• The proliferation of connectivity to <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
• The level of comfort of people <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
technology<br />
• The success of promised technology <strong>in</strong><br />
deliver<strong>in</strong>g e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess functionality<br />
• The ability of customer companies to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />
publisher’s content <strong>in</strong>to employee’s workflow<br />
14.2.4 <strong>Economy</strong><br />
Economic drivers <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• The growth of <strong>the</strong> economy<br />
• The purchas<strong>in</strong>g power of <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />
• The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> disposable <strong>in</strong>come for<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g on publishers’ products<br />
• The impact of <strong>the</strong> transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
• The impact of <strong>the</strong> tax regime<br />
82
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
14.3 The chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge<br />
economy scenarios<br />
Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess and analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> trends it is apparent<br />
that publishers, sooner or later, will be work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy environment with <strong>the</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g characteristics:<br />
• High take up of broadband Internet, wireless<br />
devices and digital TV and ubiquitous use of<br />
personal devices <strong>in</strong> office, home, schools and<br />
while travell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Content will have a high value to <strong>the</strong><br />
purchaser if it is <strong>in</strong> context at time of use<br />
• The use of personal devices such as PDAs<br />
and mobile telephones will <strong>in</strong>crease as will<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir functionality<br />
• Bus<strong>in</strong>esses will deploy sophisticated CRM<br />
techniques and can thus target products<br />
accurately to consumers<br />
• Advertisers will be target<strong>in</strong>g audiences more<br />
precisely and will require more data to prove<br />
effectiveness<br />
• The Internet will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly become a<br />
research tool<br />
• Shopp<strong>in</strong>g will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be a major pastime<br />
<strong>in</strong> large out of town centres<br />
• Consumer will have easy access to products<br />
from around <strong>the</strong> world and electronic<br />
payments will be universally accepted<br />
• Integration of different media will be easier and<br />
more sought after, thus dist<strong>in</strong>ction between<br />
broadcast and pr<strong>in</strong>ted content dim<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
• Younger generation will be technologically<br />
sophisticated and take access to content<br />
for granted<br />
The change to a knowledge economy will lead<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g to polarise <strong>in</strong>to commoditised content<br />
and contextualised content, as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 14.1. The polarisation, however, will offer<br />
companies many opportunities to establish new<br />
products and services for traditional markets as<br />
well as additional services to <strong>the</strong> end-user. The<br />
impact on publish<strong>in</strong>g depends on <strong>the</strong> rate of<br />
change and <strong>the</strong> preparedness of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />
adapt to it at any given time. The implications<br />
are discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.<br />
Figure 14.1 The axes of <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy<br />
High<br />
Work<br />
Contextualised<br />
content<br />
Ubiquitous<br />
USE<br />
ACCESS<br />
PRICE<br />
Restricted<br />
Commoditised<br />
content<br />
<strong>Home</strong><br />
Low<br />
14.3.1 Slow adaptation to a slowly<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy<br />
This scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry react<strong>in</strong>g slowly to <strong>the</strong><br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment of content<br />
re-use and targeted advertis<strong>in</strong>g. It is fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
compounded by a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess conditions.<br />
Premise<br />
• Circulations and sales per title cont<strong>in</strong>ue to fall<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend decreases<br />
• Taxes rise as priorities shift from personal<br />
consumption to public goods, such as<br />
transport and health<br />
• Cautious, conservative attitude to life from <strong>the</strong><br />
general public<br />
• Pace of technological change slows and<br />
companies put off <strong>in</strong>vestments and upgrades<br />
• Investments <strong>in</strong> new technology are not made<br />
by publishers<br />
• Publishers fail to seize <strong>the</strong> challenge of <strong>the</strong><br />
digital media<br />
• New title output decreases<br />
• Publishers fail to get close to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />
Implications<br />
• Free to air and low cost media ga<strong>in</strong> market<br />
share as consumers cut back on<br />
><br />
83
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
discretionary spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• (But) low bus<strong>in</strong>ess profitability and low growth<br />
hit B2B and B2C advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Product <strong>in</strong>novation – e.g. new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
launches – slows<br />
• E-commerce stalls as bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
slows and consumers shun onl<strong>in</strong>e shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Consumers unwill<strong>in</strong>g to share personal data<br />
but are less fickle and more brand loyal<br />
• Local media and libraries more valued as<br />
people spend less time at work<br />
• Mergers and acquisitions accelerate as media<br />
companies attempt to ga<strong>in</strong> scale<br />
Outcome<br />
If <strong>the</strong> new bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment is slow to<br />
take off due to <strong>the</strong> slow take up of network<br />
technologies, publish<strong>in</strong>g companies will be<br />
exposed to <strong>the</strong> weaknesses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
where sales per title are decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong>re will<br />
be no chance of exploit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> opportunities<br />
projected to occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
environment.<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry not move to put <strong>in</strong>to place<br />
new processes and support<strong>in</strong>g technology to<br />
reduce costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>the</strong> problems will<br />
be compounded as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry will be faced<br />
with dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g revenues without be<strong>in</strong>g able<br />
to reduce costs.<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry will lose out because<br />
it will be exposed to its weaknesses and unable<br />
to meet <strong>the</strong> challenges of a shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
environment.<br />
14.3.2 The fast pace of <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> knowledge economy catches<br />
publishers unaware<br />
This scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> impact of a very<br />
dynamic change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />
competitive environment with <strong>the</strong> shift to a new<br />
knowledge economy occurr<strong>in</strong>g at a rapid pace.<br />
It fur<strong>the</strong>r suggests that publishers have had<br />
<strong>in</strong>sufficient time to prepare for <strong>the</strong> new<br />
environment and are exposed to <strong>the</strong> threats<br />
that have been identified with regard to miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out on exploit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new opportunities.<br />
Premise<br />
• <strong>Economy</strong> supports personal consumption<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g at a faster rate<br />
• Affluent and young consumers use <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />
technologies for (some) physical shopp<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
digital purchases and bill<strong>in</strong>g and bank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transactions<br />
• ‘Dest<strong>in</strong>ation shopp<strong>in</strong>g’ occurs ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> outof-town<br />
developments <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
enterta<strong>in</strong>ment facilities and ‘shop w<strong>in</strong>dows’ for<br />
travel and f<strong>in</strong>ancial services<br />
• Pace of technology growth cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />
• The roll out of broadband and wireless<br />
technology accelerates<br />
• Publishers squeezed by new entrants <strong>in</strong>to<br />
market<br />
• Large funds are put <strong>in</strong>to new start-ups, but<br />
lessons are learnt from ‘Internet’<br />
Implications<br />
• Publishers are panicked <strong>in</strong>to ‘Internet-type’<br />
response<br />
• Publishers forced to develop chargeable<br />
services around creation and use of content<br />
• Focus is lost on exist<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess as time and<br />
money is spent on catch<strong>in</strong>g up<br />
• Lack of <strong>in</strong>centives to create content<br />
• Large <strong>in</strong>vestments are made adapt<strong>in</strong>g content<br />
and advertis<strong>in</strong>g systems<br />
• Publishers unprepared to exploit new<br />
opportunities<br />
• Content may be dumbed-down, but<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation easily available to every consumer,<br />
wherever <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
• Even greater fight for attention from<br />
consumers<br />
• Retail cha<strong>in</strong> becomes less important<br />
• Sophisticated CRM and CMS needed to<br />
manage multiple channels<br />
• Large retailers become major guardians of <strong>the</strong><br />
customer relationship and customer data<br />
• Retail brands are <strong>the</strong> most trusted by<br />
consumers and are extended back <strong>in</strong>to<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
Outcome<br />
The speed of change is such that publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
84
The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
companies are unable to move quickly enough<br />
to respond to <strong>the</strong> opportunities and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
<strong>in</strong>vest considerable time and money <strong>in</strong><br />
respond<strong>in</strong>g rapidly to new threats over which<br />
<strong>the</strong>y have little control. Focus is lost as<br />
competition comes from new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
market and o<strong>the</strong>r media companies. Advertisers<br />
move spend<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> media that can deliver <strong>the</strong><br />
best mix of broad and targeted audiences.<br />
14.3.3 Careful transition of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy<br />
The scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> advent of <strong>the</strong><br />
changed knowledge economy occurr<strong>in</strong>g at<br />
a pace that plays to <strong>the</strong> strengths of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The publishers have<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued to put <strong>in</strong> place processes, technology<br />
and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models which migrate <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses to operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a managed and<br />
measured transition from paper-based<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g to digital media dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g. The publishers are <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>in</strong> a<br />
position to exploit fully <strong>the</strong> opportunities of <strong>the</strong><br />
new environment, assum<strong>in</strong>g that o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
regulatory and economic factors are favourable.<br />
Premise<br />
• Adoption of technology by <strong>the</strong> general public<br />
follows predicted trends<br />
• Bus<strong>in</strong>esses adapt <strong>the</strong>ir processes at a<br />
steady pace<br />
• Take up of new network services mirrors take<br />
up of Internet<br />
• Companies implement <strong>in</strong>tegrated publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technology systems <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g DRM, CMS<br />
and CRM<br />
• Companies migrate <strong>the</strong>ir paper-based<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses at a manageable pace to<br />
digital bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
• Strategic acquisitions, mergers and<br />
partnerships are made to offer <strong>the</strong> best<br />
products and services to end-customers and<br />
advertisers.<br />
Implications<br />
• <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> companies implement technologies<br />
to improve processes and reduce costs while<br />
prepar<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> future<br />
• Pr<strong>in</strong>t revenues form <strong>the</strong> basis of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
company revenues for a good number of<br />
years<br />
• Investments are kept at reasonable levels<br />
• Mergers and acquisitions can be carried<br />
across media<br />
Outcome<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is able to develop<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, implement technological<br />
changes and staff tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a manner that can<br />
be supported by its exist<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess and move<br />
to streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
improves its competitive position and can react<br />
quickly to exploit new opportunities and ward<br />
off, as yet, unforeseen threats.<br />
14.4 Scenario conclusion<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry must prepare itself for<br />
life <strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy. The <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
cannot directly <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> rate of change <strong>in</strong><br />
that environment, but it can take actions now<br />
to ensure it can migrate profitably to <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy at <strong>the</strong> same time as<br />
protect<strong>in</strong>g itself from <strong>the</strong> effects of ei<strong>the</strong>r a<br />
recession and slow uptake or a dramatic<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> acceptance of <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />
economy by both bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>the</strong> public.<br />
Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report will provide an analysis of<br />
<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> issues affect<strong>in</strong>g future competitiveness<br />
and draw out <strong>the</strong> necessary action po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
85
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
PART2 PART1<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
87
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
CHAPTER<br />
15<br />
The challenge of susta<strong>in</strong>able growth<br />
15.1 Introduction<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has traditionally been<br />
divided along <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es of publication or product<br />
types. For example, newspaper publishers have<br />
had very little <strong>in</strong> common with fiction book<br />
publishers. Hence, <strong>the</strong> division <strong>in</strong>to numerous<br />
trade associations. Although this served <strong>the</strong><br />
relevant sectors very well <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> very<br />
creation of UK <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media, an alliance<br />
of <strong>the</strong> PA, PPA, NPA and Newspaper Society,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry perceives <strong>the</strong> need<br />
for reassess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se divisions. Indeed, one of<br />
<strong>the</strong> first debates that was held with <strong>the</strong> steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
committee for this project, centred around<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r we were look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> activity of<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g as traditionally def<strong>in</strong>ed or at <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies, which may<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude activities not currently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>stream of publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> first areas for analysis was <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and its ability to<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support present activities and how<br />
well placed it is to grow. Large and strong<br />
companies lead<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dustry should help<br />
more companies to start and flourish, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more <strong>in</strong>novation to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> fragmentation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
has been assessed <strong>in</strong> regard to <strong>the</strong> UK’s ability<br />
Figure 15.1 Indication of migration of<br />
revenue to new bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />
Revenue<br />
Source Pira International<br />
New<br />
Substitute<br />
Old<br />
Time<br />
to be active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global publish<strong>in</strong>g/media<br />
market and for companies to protect aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
threats from new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market.<br />
As has been described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scenarios, <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong> a transition towards a<br />
rich, competitive knowledge economy through<br />
which it needs to leverage its exist<strong>in</strong>g strengths<br />
to build even stronger bus<strong>in</strong>esses. This provides<br />
publishers with <strong>the</strong> challenge of migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses from one of decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sales per title,<br />
via a substitution of revenue by ways of revenue<br />
generated by adaptations of exist<strong>in</strong>g product, to<br />
an era of growth based on truly new products<br />
and services. This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 15.1.<br />
As one publish<strong>in</strong>g executive said: “Publishers<br />
are good at respond<strong>in</strong>g to demand, but not<br />
good at creat<strong>in</strong>g it.”<br />
15.2 Take <strong>the</strong> wrapper off<br />
The products of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry have<br />
until recently been closely identified with <strong>the</strong><br />
way <strong>the</strong>y are packaged, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as content<br />
that appears <strong>in</strong> different wrappers. For example,<br />
newspapers predom<strong>in</strong>antly see <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
broadsheet or tabloid as <strong>the</strong> vehicle for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
news; magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers see <strong>the</strong>ir brand<br />
<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically coupled to <strong>the</strong> glossy paper carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir content. Some products – for example<br />
learned journals and directories – have moved<br />
much fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
‘unwrapped’ than o<strong>the</strong>rs. Both publishers and<br />
users are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to evolve towards new<br />
concepts of what <strong>the</strong>y can do with content<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g new technologies, but opportunities are<br />
not always grasped.<br />
Although it is essential to protect <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
products and brands that currently provide <strong>the</strong><br />
lion’s share of <strong>the</strong> revenue (<strong>in</strong> most but not all<br />
cases), publishers do need to reassess <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
assets <strong>in</strong> terms of how to maximise <strong>the</strong> potential<br />
of <strong>the</strong>ir content and use it outside of its<br />
traditional wrappers.<br />
Publishers who generate large proportions of<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir revenues from advertis<strong>in</strong>g also need to<br />
reassess <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g content<br />
and also <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>red from <strong>the</strong> use<br />
of <strong>the</strong> advertisement. The bus<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong><br />
88
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
publisher no longer f<strong>in</strong>ishes once an<br />
advertisement is published accurately and<br />
attractively on a page. A range of additional<br />
revenue sources can be foreseen from<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an onl<strong>in</strong>e environment such as:<br />
• Profil<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Sales transactions<br />
• User <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
• Tight target<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Measurement of results<br />
• Added functionality<br />
Most publishers, when talk<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
entrepreneurship, mean creat<strong>in</strong>g more products<br />
of <strong>the</strong> same product type. A new product for a<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e company is a new magaz<strong>in</strong>e, likewise<br />
a new product for a book publisher is a new<br />
book. It is time for publishers to take a fresh<br />
entrepreneurial approach to product<br />
development and use <strong>the</strong>ir content pool to<br />
create new product types, not just more of <strong>the</strong><br />
same old products. These new product types,<br />
free of <strong>the</strong>ir traditional wrappers, will f<strong>in</strong>d a place<br />
<strong>in</strong> both old and new markets. It is no longer<br />
good enough for a publisher to expect to grow<br />
<strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess only by “publish<strong>in</strong>g more books”<br />
as one executive put it.<br />
The first step <strong>in</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> challenge of<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able growth for publishers is to take <strong>the</strong><br />
wrapper off all <strong>the</strong>ir content. This is happen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at various speeds throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />
we will return to this fur<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
15.3 Can <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
compete on a global scale?<br />
Many publishers have said that <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry is now a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
local markets have <strong>the</strong>ir own peculiarities <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of <strong>the</strong> language and culture. To compete<br />
on a global scale, UK companies must have a<br />
strong home base from which <strong>the</strong>y can develop<br />
a truly global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. This requires two ma<strong>in</strong><br />
factors: a) <strong>the</strong> regulation on company ownership<br />
needs to be such that companies can grow <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> areas of media <strong>the</strong>y need to develop <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses; and, b) that <strong>the</strong> companies<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves have <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial, organisational<br />
and technical <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> place to exploit<br />
<strong>the</strong> opportunities.<br />
15.3.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
The proliferation of <strong>the</strong> English language across<br />
<strong>the</strong> world should provide UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
companies with many opportunities and it will<br />
be one of <strong>the</strong>ir strengths. The <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK is also a strength.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong> total of new titles has dim<strong>in</strong>ished<br />
recently <strong>in</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es, all o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
sectors demonstrate an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> new title<br />
output (See Part 1).<br />
As has been shown <strong>in</strong> Part 1 <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK is broad and diverse. Its<br />
ability to export to both English and non-English<br />
language markets is strong. Individual <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
sectors are on <strong>the</strong>ir own fiercely competitive,<br />
which leads to strength <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
comparison terms.<br />
In markets where <strong>the</strong>re is no special<br />
regulatory regime, UK companies have<br />
demonstrated an ability to create successful<br />
global bus<strong>in</strong>esses. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g, for<br />
example, both Pearson and Reed-Elsevier have<br />
created powerful positions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir particular<br />
segments. In fact, Reed-Elsevier has evolved<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess where it can operate any<br />
part of its bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> any part of <strong>the</strong> world,<br />
mov<strong>in</strong>g to areas of <strong>the</strong> world offer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> best<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment.<br />
Books and journals<br />
Book and journal publish<strong>in</strong>g has always been<br />
<strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>ternationally oriented of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors. Historically <strong>the</strong> most<br />
important markets have been <strong>in</strong> Englishspeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
areas of <strong>the</strong> world such as <strong>the</strong><br />
Commonwealth, as well as <strong>the</strong> US. Now <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trade with <strong>the</strong> EU and o<strong>the</strong>r nontraditional<br />
regions such as Eastern Europe.<br />
The journal publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is now<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ated by a handful of global players, for<br />
whom <strong>the</strong> major focus of activity, both <strong>in</strong> terms<br />
of sourc<strong>in</strong>g content and sell<strong>in</strong>g products and<br />
services, is <strong>the</strong> US. Reed Elsevier and Wolters<br />
Kluwer may be European <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> but <strong>in</strong> ><br />
89
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
practice <strong>the</strong>y are global/US players. Even<br />
Cambridge University Press operates equally<br />
from <strong>the</strong> US and <strong>the</strong> UK, although its activity is<br />
more on <strong>the</strong> book side. Pearson’s centre of<br />
gravity is also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US. The issues<br />
specifically affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> education and research<br />
market are exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next section.<br />
Digital technologies such as remote short run<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g are open<strong>in</strong>g up o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
market opportunities for newspapers and<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, while <strong>the</strong> Internet has exposed all<br />
publishers to a degree of potential competition<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir domestic markets and <strong>the</strong> possibility of<br />
an <strong>in</strong>ternational audience.<br />
Drivers for <strong>in</strong>ternational expansion<br />
The growth of middle classes with higher<br />
disposable <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong> many parts of <strong>the</strong> world<br />
where English is widely understood, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
with <strong>the</strong> demand for learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> English<br />
language <strong>in</strong> new regions, such as <strong>the</strong> former<br />
Soviet republics <strong>in</strong> Central Asia, is open<strong>in</strong>g up<br />
new markets to British publishers. The market<br />
opportunity is most obvious for English<br />
Language Teach<strong>in</strong>g (ELT) materials, but<br />
<strong>the</strong>re will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be demand for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
types of books.<br />
It also appears that <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g market for<br />
books <strong>in</strong> English with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, where English is<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>the</strong> favoured second language, is<br />
benefit<strong>in</strong>g UK exporters more than those from<br />
<strong>the</strong> US. East and Central Europe, which <strong>in</strong><br />
Table 15.1 <strong>in</strong>cludes Russia and Turkey, has<br />
also been a major growth area for book exports<br />
from <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
These figures must be accompanied by<br />
various caveats about <strong>in</strong>terpretation. As<br />
mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on statistical analysis<br />
above, <strong>the</strong> book <strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />
localis<strong>in</strong>g production, directly or under licence.<br />
Therefore it should not be concluded from <strong>the</strong>se<br />
numbers that sales of books by UK publishers<br />
<strong>in</strong> some markets, such as Australia and New<br />
Zealand, have actually decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this period.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong>se markets have been particularly<br />
adversely affected by sterl<strong>in</strong>g’s relative strength,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are also areas where UK publishers are<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly publish<strong>in</strong>g via subsidiaries because<br />
of changes <strong>in</strong> respect of territorial copyright<br />
(see below).<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers<br />
With<strong>in</strong> advanced markets, <strong>the</strong> existence of highspeed<br />
networks has facilitated remote pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
general, and short-run digital pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g now opens<br />
up <strong>the</strong> possibility of economically servic<strong>in</strong>g small<br />
groups of readers overseas. This applies both to<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, such as specialist bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and more general newspapers<br />
targeted at travell<strong>in</strong>g UK citizens, which are<br />
currently distributed often very late and<br />
expensively, or are unobta<strong>in</strong>able. Associated<br />
Newspapers envisages a situation where<br />
travellers may order a specially customised<br />
edition, which will be delivered to a pr<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hotel, and be will<strong>in</strong>g to pay<br />
a premium price for it.<br />
Format sales and <strong>in</strong>ternational launches<br />
There has long been an <strong>in</strong>ternational trade <strong>in</strong><br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e formats, with many cross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Atlantic and some arriv<strong>in</strong>g from Australia and<br />
Germany. There appear to be no numbers<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g net or gross revenues from this trade<br />
Figure 15.2 Sales of books, schools and ELT,<br />
ex-warehouse prices, £m<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
1990<br />
1992<br />
Source Publishers’ Association<br />
• School and ELT, home • School and ELT, export<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
90
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Table 15.1 Exports of books from <strong>the</strong> UK, £m, current prices<br />
1995 1999 2000 2001<br />
European Union 427.5 436.0 474.2 501.1<br />
Rest of Western Europe 43.5 47.7 44.7 37.9<br />
East and Central Europe 33.8 41.1 42.9 46.0<br />
USA 169.0 201.9 212.6 213.1<br />
Canada 26.6 29.4 32.7 25.6<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r America 37.3 41.5 39.1 44.3<br />
Australia 81.9 75.9 69.5 66.9<br />
New Zealand 15.9 13.2 14.5 12.9<br />
Africa 75.4 70.7 67.4 76.1<br />
Asia and Far East 178.1 166 176.3 181.5<br />
World Total 1089.0 1123.4 1174.0 1205.4<br />
At 2001 general prices 1265.8 1177.1 1194.7 1205.4<br />
Source Overseas Trade Statistics<br />
for UK publishers, and many UK magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers are part of <strong>in</strong>ternational groups:<br />
National Magaz<strong>in</strong>es (Hearst), IPC (now AOL-<br />
Time Warner), Conde Nast, Advanstar, etc, so<br />
<strong>the</strong>re will be <strong>in</strong>ternal format transfers. Even<br />
where this is <strong>the</strong> case, it would be <strong>in</strong>structive to<br />
take note of <strong>the</strong> direction of transfer as an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dication of <strong>the</strong> location of creative <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />
Sometimes publishers launch <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
editions of magaz<strong>in</strong>es directly. Hello! magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
is a case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t, where <strong>the</strong> Spanish owners<br />
launched both <strong>the</strong> English edition of !Hola! and<br />
a French edition. Hello! is actually <strong>the</strong> UK’s<br />
largest magaz<strong>in</strong>e export, ow<strong>in</strong>g to its<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational subject matter (globally famous<br />
people) and its relatively simple English, which<br />
(almost!) qualifies it as an ELT product.<br />
The F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times is <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />
oriented of UK newspapers, regard<strong>in</strong>g itself<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly as address<strong>in</strong>g a global audience of<br />
senior bus<strong>in</strong>ess people and policymakers. It has<br />
launched separate editions of <strong>the</strong> newspaper for<br />
<strong>the</strong> US market and for Germany, after hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
had a separate European edition pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong><br />
Frankfurt and o<strong>the</strong>r centres for many years. The<br />
paper’s <strong>in</strong>ternational expansion strategy has<br />
also <strong>in</strong>volved tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment stakes <strong>in</strong><br />
European bus<strong>in</strong>ess newspaper and magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers such as Les Echos <strong>in</strong> France and<br />
Recoletos <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>.<br />
15.3.2 Challenges<br />
The challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> an<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly global marketplace are grouped<br />
under three head<strong>in</strong>gs: competition regulation<br />
and cross media ownership restrictions; US<br />
competition and territorial rights; and copyright<br />
protection and piracy.<br />
Competition regulation and cross media<br />
ownership restrictions 2<br />
The Government to date has tended to view <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as its <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a whole <strong>in</strong>dustry. For example,<br />
<strong>the</strong> special competition rules around<br />
newspapers mean that <strong>the</strong>y are treated<br />
differently from magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publishers,<br />
because of <strong>the</strong> potential impact of concentration<br />
of ownership on political life. The consequence<br />
is also that it re<strong>in</strong>forces <strong>the</strong> divisions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry along vertical sub-sector l<strong>in</strong>es, which<br />
is at odds with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r drivers push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry towards scale and cross-platform<br />
deployment of brands and content.<br />
The UK lacks a major media player such as<br />
Bertelsmann, Vivendi or AOL-Time Warner,<br />
yet all <strong>the</strong>se companies are active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
The regulation rules on media-ownership<br />
2 S<strong>in</strong>ce writ<strong>in</strong>g this report, <strong>the</strong> UK Government has issued a<br />
draft Communications Bill that addresses many of <strong>the</strong> issues<br />
raised <strong>in</strong> this section. ><br />
91
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
undoubtedly have a role to play. They make it<br />
easier for new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> UK media<br />
market from abroad to establish a presence<br />
here than for UK companies to build a strong<br />
home base. The def<strong>in</strong>ition of markets needs to<br />
be carefully considered as <strong>the</strong> number of<br />
channels through which end customers can<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creases, so does <strong>the</strong><br />
potential for plurality and diversity. If <strong>the</strong><br />
Government is serious about creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
conditions for a global UK-owned media player<br />
to be established, competition law and media<br />
ownership needs to be looked at afresh. This<br />
is tak<strong>in</strong>g place, although <strong>the</strong> outcome is<br />
unknown at <strong>the</strong> time of writ<strong>in</strong>g. What is evident<br />
is that <strong>the</strong> UK has a relatively restrictive<br />
competition regime <strong>in</strong> a small market, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
fragmentation, while <strong>in</strong>ternational competitors<br />
build scale and cross-platform capabilities.<br />
Indeed, look<strong>in</strong>g at markets such as ELT, STM<br />
and professional publish<strong>in</strong>g, where competition<br />
and ownership rules are much more relaxed,<br />
UK companies can compete on a global scale.<br />
Specifically, cross-media ownership<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts currently prevent local papers from<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g cross-platform local <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
providers. The argument for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plurality<br />
and diversity of op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se markets is open<br />
to question as most local markets already have<br />
access to more than one local radio station,<br />
plus <strong>the</strong> BBC local radio stations. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />
<strong>the</strong> competition rules on newspaper mergers,<br />
which require automatic referral to <strong>the</strong><br />
Competition Commission, lead to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />
and unwarranted cost. Of 500 cases referred to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Competition Commission only three have<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> a competitive issue be<strong>in</strong>g found.<br />
The head of a regional newspaper company<br />
said: “A level play<strong>in</strong>g field <strong>in</strong> local markets must<br />
be created, so that we can start to experiment<br />
with extend<strong>in</strong>g our brand.”<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “Newspapers could br<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
professionalism to local broadcast<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
1 If <strong>the</strong> Government wants to encourage globally<br />
powerful UK-based publish<strong>in</strong>g and media<br />
companies it must consider relax<strong>in</strong>g competition<br />
law <strong>in</strong> how it treats <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g sector and<br />
re-exam<strong>in</strong>e its def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> relevant publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sector market.<br />
US competition and territorial rights<br />
Just as penetrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> US market successfully<br />
is <strong>the</strong> great prize for media companies <strong>in</strong><br />
general, so its products represent <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />
potential challenge to British book publishers <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir home and third markets. It rema<strong>in</strong>s more<br />
potential than actual, largely due to <strong>the</strong><br />
historically <strong>in</strong>sular outlook of <strong>the</strong> American<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
As one publisher put it: “The US <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
th<strong>in</strong>ks American, whereas <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
th<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong>ternational.”<br />
And ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “If <strong>the</strong> Americans got <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
act <strong>in</strong> gear, <strong>the</strong>y’d wipe <strong>the</strong> floor with us.”<br />
Historically, territorial copyright has def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>the</strong> market areas where particular publishers’<br />
book editions shall be sold. Authors and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
agents have made deals with publishers to sell<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir books <strong>in</strong> particular geographical markets.<br />
Booksellers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se markets and publishers of<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r editions were not permitted to sell or<br />
supply o<strong>the</strong>r editions <strong>in</strong>to those markets.<br />
The growth of Internet booksell<strong>in</strong>g, where<br />
consumers purchased US editions of books<br />
directly from Amazon.com, for example, was<br />
one challenge to this system, although <strong>the</strong><br />
volume impact was small. S<strong>in</strong>ce Amazon began<br />
supply<strong>in</strong>g from its own offshoots based <strong>in</strong>side<br />
<strong>the</strong> UK and o<strong>the</strong>r countries, and s<strong>in</strong>ce rights<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation has been attached to book<br />
descriptions, this has largely subsided.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>flux of US-owned super-retailers such<br />
as Borders were also felt to place <strong>the</strong> system at<br />
risk, but now <strong>the</strong> US publishers have<br />
acknowledged that <strong>the</strong>y should not supply<br />
US editions to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
A separate issue has been <strong>the</strong> decision of<br />
some markets covered by UK publishers to<br />
declare <strong>the</strong>mselves open, or to impose time<br />
limits with<strong>in</strong> which UK publishers must publish a<br />
local edition or face competition from a US one.<br />
Many commentators (especially Americans)<br />
92
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
have seen territorial rights as a hangover from a<br />
past era, and argued that <strong>in</strong> a world of globally<br />
transmitted <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>the</strong> idea of rights based<br />
on geography is outmoded. Before immediately<br />
accept<strong>in</strong>g what is a superficially compell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
argument, it is worth look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> issue from<br />
<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of view of <strong>the</strong> author and agent. They<br />
may well wish to maximise <strong>the</strong>ir return from <strong>the</strong><br />
licens<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> work by do<strong>in</strong>g deals with<br />
separate publishers that have expertise <strong>in</strong><br />
particular markets. They will be unable to do this<br />
if US editions, which will tend to be cheaper on<br />
<strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong>ir very large home market, are<br />
allowed equal access to all markets. The end<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of territorial rights could also lead to a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
concentration of ownership <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />
which could be damag<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> range of<br />
products on offer and employment levels with<strong>in</strong><br />
UK publish<strong>in</strong>g. It must also be said that<br />
currently <strong>the</strong> US does not offer a level play<strong>in</strong>g<br />
field for <strong>in</strong>ternational media companies to <strong>in</strong>vest<br />
<strong>in</strong> US media and has been unwill<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
exchange <strong>the</strong> old area, criticised as a relic of<br />
<strong>the</strong> empire, for a new one <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />
Large UK publishers have also taken steps to<br />
ensure that <strong>the</strong>y do not publish too late or too<br />
expensively <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant markets, so <strong>the</strong>re<br />
has been a converg<strong>in</strong>g effect, achieved partly<br />
by local production. This is less open to smaller<br />
publishers who may need more help <strong>in</strong> this<br />
regard, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>ir overall contribution to UK<br />
book exports is substantial.<br />
Copyright protection and piracy<br />
In addition to <strong>the</strong> issues surround<strong>in</strong>g digital<br />
copyright, dealt with <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on digital<br />
media below, <strong>the</strong>re is also a serious threat of<br />
piracy of physical material. This is particularly<br />
an issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book and directory <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
Newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, be<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
ephemeral and not so <strong>in</strong>ternationally traded,<br />
are less affected.<br />
Publishers are constantly engaged <strong>in</strong> small<br />
skirmishes with pirates. Lately <strong>the</strong>re has been<br />
encourag<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>in</strong> some Asian markets<br />
with <strong>the</strong> co-operation of governments and police<br />
forces, but <strong>in</strong> some cases, piracy has been<br />
actively encouraged, or at <strong>the</strong> least condoned,<br />
by foreign governments. Here, high-level<br />
support from <strong>the</strong> UK government <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<br />
of pressure on <strong>the</strong> offend<strong>in</strong>g state is vital.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
24 Government must keep up high-level pressure<br />
on foreign governments to cease piracy and to<br />
take action aga<strong>in</strong>st copyright violators.<br />
15.4 The skills to compete<br />
A strong, well-qualified workforce is essential to<br />
<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g ability to<br />
compete. However, <strong>the</strong> very success of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry as a magnet for talented and highly<br />
qualified young people may be mask<strong>in</strong>g some<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g problems.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> course of our <strong>in</strong>terviews senior<br />
executives rarely identified a lack of skills as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g a constra<strong>in</strong>t on <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>esses. This may<br />
be <strong>in</strong> part a reflection of <strong>the</strong> downturn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
high technology and telecommunications<br />
sectors follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> burst<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
bubble, which has eased <strong>the</strong> difficulty and cost<br />
of hir<strong>in</strong>g specialist technical staff. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews with middle managers, those<br />
responsible for publish<strong>in</strong>g divisions and those<br />
manag<strong>in</strong>g e-commerce projects, it became clear<br />
that <strong>the</strong>re are core skills which need to be<br />
developed and extended. This is supported by<br />
<strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO Foresight<br />
survey below. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> concentration of<br />
much of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> London is<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g to o<strong>the</strong>r issues of a more social and<br />
quality of life nature.<br />
Table 15.2 Skill requirements<br />
New skills are needed to cope with <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>troduction of new technology 80<br />
New skills are needed <strong>in</strong> order to develop new<br />
products/services 69<br />
New skills are needed to cope with new work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
practices 66<br />
Skill needs have not changed 13<br />
Base 523<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO Skills Foresight, 2001 Base All employers<br />
%<br />
93
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
15.4.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has been highly<br />
attractive to graduates and school-leavers for<br />
some time. This trend cont<strong>in</strong>ues and it offers an<br />
opportunity for publishers to recruit bright young<br />
people. In fact, <strong>the</strong> education level of people<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g is well above average<br />
(see Table 15.2).<br />
The dynamic and fashionable nature of <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess attracts many people to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Indeed, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early part of a person’s career<br />
<strong>the</strong> concentration of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> London is<br />
<strong>in</strong> itself an attraction. This provides <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
with a highly qualified, relatively low cost<br />
employee base.<br />
15.4.2 Challenges<br />
Most of <strong>the</strong> challenges concern<strong>in</strong>g staff<strong>in</strong>g are<br />
centred on two areas. First, <strong>the</strong>re are issues<br />
relat<strong>in</strong>g to hav<strong>in</strong>g a London and South Eastdom<strong>in</strong>ated,<br />
young employee base with a high<br />
proportion of female staff. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of deploy<strong>in</strong>g new<br />
technology <strong>in</strong> both bus<strong>in</strong>ess support and as<br />
part of products. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
responses to <strong>the</strong> effect of skills and staff<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts on <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry questions<br />
<strong>in</strong> our survey as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 15.3.<br />
There is a relatively high turnover of staff <strong>in</strong><br />
much of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. In <strong>in</strong>terviews and dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> focus groups, several publishers stated that<br />
attract<strong>in</strong>g graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> editorial<br />
and market<strong>in</strong>g is not a problem, but reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> staff is difficult. Some publishers spoke of<br />
a ‘talent gap’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle level of editorial<br />
departments. Reasons stated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
as be<strong>in</strong>g causes of this are:<br />
“<strong>the</strong> lack of a career path”<br />
“more attractive offers from o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries”<br />
“a desire for a better quality of life”<br />
The latter reason is fur<strong>the</strong>r compounded by<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry hav<strong>in</strong>g a high proportion of female<br />
staff who often tend to migrate from London<br />
when <strong>the</strong>y have a family. Ris<strong>in</strong>g house prices,<br />
congested transport and <strong>the</strong> lack of affordable<br />
childcare are factors that affect all companies<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong> south east. On <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r hand, even if it were feasible, a wholesale<br />
migration of publish<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> creative and<br />
vibrant environment offered by London would<br />
adversely affect <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> terms of its<br />
ability to attract bright university graduates at<br />
<strong>the</strong> entry level. Solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se issues is not go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to be easy but some of <strong>the</strong>m can be alleviated<br />
by <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>itiatives, especially <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, career paths and flexible work<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry moves more and more<br />
towards <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />
technology, publishers are be<strong>in</strong>g faced with <strong>the</strong><br />
need for more technically-oriented staff. This will<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve attract<strong>in</strong>g new staff to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, but<br />
Table 15.3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> skill levels, %<br />
No, or Basic Intermediate Higher level Advanced<br />
low level e.g. O levels e.g. A levels e.g. degree qualifications<br />
qualifications<br />
e.g. postgraduate<br />
All publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Management 5 5 12 65 12<br />
Editorial 3 5 17 65 5<br />
Support 5 16 44 29 2<br />
Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec. 5 32 38 19 1<br />
Production 4 25 35 30 1<br />
Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g & circulation 4 28 34 27 1<br />
Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 3 52 23 16 1<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 53 10 12 19 0<br />
Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
94
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
also retra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g staff. This is not purely<br />
a requirement for software developers and <strong>the</strong><br />
like, but for employees who can comb<strong>in</strong>e<br />
technical with editorial and management skills.<br />
The chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of products also creates a<br />
need to provide a higher degree of customer<br />
service, <strong>in</strong> terms of help desks and sales desks.<br />
As one manager of e-commerce projects said:<br />
“The biggest problem <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
application has been <strong>the</strong> retra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of both our<br />
staff and those of <strong>the</strong> customers.”<br />
The re-use of content and <strong>the</strong> need to put<br />
this content <strong>in</strong> context is beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to put new<br />
demands on publishers. This is particularly<br />
evident <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, education and<br />
academic publish<strong>in</strong>g markets, although o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
publishers will need to come to terms with this<br />
over <strong>the</strong> next few years. New skills will be<br />
needed to create <strong>the</strong> taxonomies and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation architectures that will underp<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
re-purpos<strong>in</strong>g of content. This is not a one-off<br />
requirement, but one that will constantly develop<br />
as <strong>the</strong> Internet and o<strong>the</strong>r networks evolve and<br />
change. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> better target<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
Figure 15.3 Skill-related constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
Difficulty <strong>in</strong> staff retention or recruitment<br />
Skills shortages<br />
Availability of experienced middle/senior managers<br />
Does not constra<strong>in</strong><br />
Slightly constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Moderately constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
•<br />
Heavily constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Severely constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />
0% 5 10 15 20<br />
Source Pira Survey<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>creased direct mail spend<br />
will force publishers’ market<strong>in</strong>g and sales<br />
departments to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> CRM techniques.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
2 As <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry moves ever closer to<br />
produc<strong>in</strong>g new products and services that use<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g degrees of <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />
value-added services, <strong>the</strong> need for specialists <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and technology will<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease. This will require <strong>the</strong> ability to attract<br />
people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and cont<strong>in</strong>ually tra<strong>in</strong> and<br />
re-tra<strong>in</strong> staff. A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g Sector Skills<br />
Council (SSC) must be established urgently to<br />
ensure that <strong>the</strong> skills reflect those required <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy.<br />
3 Proper career development paths us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrystandard<br />
qualifications (driven by SSC) must be<br />
put <strong>in</strong>to place. This will encourage young<br />
graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry who will be able to<br />
compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry more easily<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>r potential careers.<br />
15.5 Industry profile<br />
The wide-range of customers and markets<br />
serviced by <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry means that<br />
it is faced with a diverse range of issues and<br />
makes it difficult to speak with one voice. The<br />
competition from o<strong>the</strong>r media conglomerates<br />
makes it imperative that <strong>the</strong> Government, o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries and consumers understand <strong>the</strong><br />
expertise that is conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry and how it can be exploited with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy. As stated above, <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry already has highly-qualified people and<br />
is add<strong>in</strong>g more skills <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation re-use, etc.<br />
These are crucial to <strong>the</strong> UK becom<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
effective player <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global economy for<br />
electronic <strong>in</strong>formation and e-commerce.<br />
15.5.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has a recognised and<br />
important role to play <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural and<br />
economic well-be<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> country. This<br />
manifests itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability of <strong>the</strong> variety<br />
of publications used, almost subconsciously, by<br />
nearly everyone <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country every day of ><br />
95
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir life. There is every reason to believe that<br />
this will cont<strong>in</strong>ue as <strong>the</strong> world moves towards<br />
a knowledge economy and this is an important<br />
opportunity for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Individual sectors have vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />
profile with <strong>the</strong> Government. The national and<br />
regional newspapers are obviously very highprofile<br />
and are used as a prime way of gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
messages over to <strong>the</strong> public. But Government<br />
does not always see <strong>the</strong> newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry as<br />
an <strong>in</strong>dustry ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a platform for <strong>the</strong><br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of messages.The role of<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publishers <strong>in</strong> society is<br />
probably less obvious to government.<br />
The skill sets available across <strong>the</strong> board<br />
of publish<strong>in</strong>g ranges from be<strong>in</strong>g able to<br />
manipulate, contextualise and personalise<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation through profil<strong>in</strong>g end-user groups.<br />
This is a core set of skills for <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />
economy and one that no o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry has to<br />
such depth and breadth. There is an opportunity<br />
to exploit this expertise outside of <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g products.<br />
The number of Hollywood films based on<br />
novels is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dramatically. This provides<br />
<strong>the</strong> book <strong>in</strong>dustry with fur<strong>the</strong>r opportunities to<br />
raise its profile as an <strong>in</strong>fluencer of society.<br />
The bus<strong>in</strong>ess publications not only arm <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry with a very valuable skill set, but also<br />
Figure 15.4 Percentage of respondents<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g importance of rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry profile<br />
Most<br />
important<br />
Least<br />
important<br />
Not very<br />
important<br />
Moderately<br />
important<br />
Quite important<br />
Source Pira Questionnaire<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence decisions taken throughout bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
Specialised bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
heavily design and purchas<strong>in</strong>g decisions <strong>in</strong><br />
companies. Many economic decisions use<br />
reports that <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />
responsible for <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
15.5.2 Challenges<br />
It was noteworthy that 72% of respondents to<br />
our survey thought that <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry should be higher.<br />
Many <strong>in</strong>dustrial companies are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to realise that <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />
documentation has commercial value. In certa<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries, such as pharmaceuticals and law,<br />
companies are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to take on <strong>the</strong> role of<br />
publishers with customised <strong>in</strong>formation tailored<br />
to <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong>ir clients and customers.<br />
The profile of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is important <strong>in</strong><br />
attract<strong>in</strong>g and reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff. As has been stated<br />
previously, <strong>the</strong>re is some concern <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry about its ability to reta<strong>in</strong> staff and to<br />
attract sufficient technological staff <strong>in</strong> times of<br />
need. The <strong>in</strong>dustry needs to build on its current<br />
profile to ensure that publish<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>the</strong><br />
board is seen as a dynamic <strong>in</strong>dustry offer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
excitement and challenges, to compete with<br />
those offered by o<strong>the</strong>r areas of <strong>the</strong> media and<br />
software <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
The role of publishers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> education of<br />
children and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of research to <strong>the</strong><br />
benefit of UK Plc is often not recognised by <strong>the</strong><br />
general public and underestimated by<br />
government. For example, early moves around<br />
<strong>the</strong> Digital Curriculum were signs that not all<br />
parts of <strong>the</strong> Government fully understood <strong>the</strong><br />
vital role that educational publishers play <strong>in</strong><br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g texts for schoolchildren. Had <strong>the</strong>y<br />
done so, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial steps to encourage <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />
to take a dom<strong>in</strong>ant role <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Digital<br />
Curriculum would have been tempered with<br />
active encouragement of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
This is also true <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic world, where<br />
journal publishers are often seen as <strong>the</strong> villa<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
whereas many of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g outlets for<br />
research would not be <strong>in</strong>itiated and available<br />
were it not for publishers.<br />
96
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
4 The <strong>in</strong>dustry should undertake market research<br />
to understand how it is perceived by end<br />
customers, government and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
This should be focused on determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong><br />
current perception of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is by <strong>the</strong>se<br />
groups; which particular expertise of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry can be targeted to which<br />
groups and develop<strong>in</strong>g a plan for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
awareness among <strong>the</strong>se groups.<br />
15.6 Industry statistics<br />
To date, <strong>the</strong> statistics ga<strong>the</strong>red for <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry have been focused on<br />
meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors. For<br />
example, advertis<strong>in</strong>g statistics are well covered<br />
particularly by <strong>the</strong> newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
sectors. Sales figures are generally well<br />
covered across <strong>the</strong> sectors. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as<br />
fully described <strong>in</strong> Part 1, it is difficult to get an<br />
overview of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole. This needs<br />
to be addressed for a number of reasons.<br />
Companies and trade associations need to be<br />
able to understand <strong>the</strong> changes occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry and respond to <strong>the</strong>m adequately. This<br />
will enable threats to be addressed at an early<br />
stage and significant changes <strong>in</strong> customer or<br />
advertiser behaviour to be identified. It is also<br />
important to be able to compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry with o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries. The <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />
also highly affected by regulation from <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Government, <strong>in</strong>dependent regulators and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions. It needs to be able to<br />
marshal evidence quickly <strong>in</strong> support of<br />
representations. The ability to po<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> size<br />
and significance of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry may be critical.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
5 In order to capture <strong>the</strong> essential dynamics of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> statistics:<br />
• <strong>DTI</strong>, ONS and UKPM to collaborate with each<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r and representatives of <strong>the</strong> EU publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> representations to EU on NACE<br />
revisions (Eurostat 2006). This is an urgent<br />
requirement as <strong>the</strong>re is an autumn deadl<strong>in</strong>e for<br />
submissions and <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itions could<br />
be <strong>in</strong> force for more than a decade.<br />
• Study to be conducted based on <strong>the</strong> gap<br />
analysis from this report to arrive at detailed<br />
recommendations on <strong>the</strong> data that needs to<br />
be collected.<br />
• Government and UKPM to collaborate <strong>in</strong> an<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative to communicate to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>the</strong><br />
importance of supply<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />
15.7 Technology adoption<br />
The results of <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>in</strong>dicate many<br />
publishers are struggl<strong>in</strong>g to comes to terms with<br />
adoption of technology, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> back-office<br />
and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> front-office. Indeed, <strong>the</strong>se are<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly l<strong>in</strong>ked and we should<br />
refer to publish<strong>in</strong>g technology to cater for both.<br />
The problems of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation systems, publish<strong>in</strong>g systems,<br />
fulfilment and order process<strong>in</strong>g systems are<br />
complicated <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustry almost unique <strong>in</strong> its<br />
capacity to deliver products electronically.<br />
15.7.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
Many web technology systems have already<br />
been implemented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
and larger companies have made major<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g new products.<br />
Technology can take out a lot of costs <strong>in</strong><br />
production and market<strong>in</strong>g. One small book<br />
Figure 15.5 Number of respondents<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g better technological advice<br />
is important for <strong>the</strong>ir future bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Most<br />
important<br />
Least<br />
important<br />
Not very<br />
important<br />
Moderately<br />
important<br />
Quite important<br />
Source Pira Survey<br />
><br />
97
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
publisher <strong>in</strong>terviewed stated that “<strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet for direct market<strong>in</strong>g has made my<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess much cheaper to run”.<br />
The responses to our questionnaire <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
areas of e-commerce and ICT illustrate clearly<br />
that <strong>the</strong> vast majority of respondents have a<br />
website and a clear majority have a site that<br />
delivers content ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g purely for<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation purposes.<br />
As far as enabl<strong>in</strong>g technologies for<br />
production, distribution, advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
customer relationship management are<br />
concerned, <strong>the</strong> picture is more patchy, but a<br />
clear majority have an <strong>in</strong>tranet and a majority<br />
have or <strong>in</strong>tend to deploy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future, fully<br />
digital workflow, content management and<br />
customer relationship management systems.<br />
Slightly less than half have, or <strong>in</strong>tend to deploy<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future, XML for media-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
storage and data <strong>in</strong>terchange. Publishers who<br />
are already us<strong>in</strong>g content across a number of<br />
platforms and channels – ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
academic/STM/reference, B2B magaz<strong>in</strong>e and<br />
directory publishers, major bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
database producers and a few newspapers<br />
have moved fur<strong>the</strong>st <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of<br />
sophisticated metadata-driven content stores.<br />
Responses to our questionnaire on<br />
expectations for <strong>the</strong> potential of different<br />
opportunities over three years also show that<br />
most publishers see <strong>the</strong> use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
technologies as extremely important (see<br />
SWOT section <strong>in</strong> Part 1). They see <strong>the</strong>m as a<br />
means of creat<strong>in</strong>g new products and services<br />
and as a way of optimis<strong>in</strong>g both editorial and<br />
production processes and order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g processes.<br />
There are extremely important <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>the</strong> board <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of<br />
e-commerce with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
• The automated returns process and<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiatives to automate <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g and payment<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Electronic advertisement trad<strong>in</strong>g trials are<br />
underway <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector, and<br />
movement towards Sales-Based<br />
Replenishment<br />
• Newspapers are mov<strong>in</strong>g rapidly towards<br />
electronic advertisement acceptance and<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are some that have implemented<br />
electronic trad<strong>in</strong>g of advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Some are<br />
deploy<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated multi-channel<br />
CRM systems.<br />
Much more detailed analysis of <strong>the</strong> application<br />
of ICT to transactions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>s of<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g companies is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a parallel<br />
Pira International Ecommerce Impact<br />
Assessment Report on <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g sector.<br />
15.7.2 Challenges<br />
Many publishers, both large and small, struggle<br />
with <strong>the</strong> complexities of adopt<strong>in</strong>g new<br />
technology. These difficulties are both at <strong>the</strong><br />
strategic and technical level. This is partly<br />
related to <strong>the</strong> skill shortages identified earlier,<br />
but it also relates to <strong>the</strong> lack of confidence felt<br />
by senior and middle managers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ability<br />
to assess <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess case for<br />
technological projects. One senior manager<br />
stated: “We have well tested methods for tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decisions on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not to publish new<br />
titles; but when it comes to tak<strong>in</strong>g decisions<br />
about implement<strong>in</strong>g technology <strong>the</strong>re is a lack<br />
of sound methodologies for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> costbenefit<br />
of each proposed project.”<br />
There is a lack of standards <strong>in</strong> most areas<br />
of technology adoption, mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult to<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrate systems effectively. Many of <strong>the</strong><br />
standardisation projects with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book and<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustries are mak<strong>in</strong>g progress, but<br />
<strong>the</strong>se take time.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
6 Sector-specific/common technology awareness<br />
forums and o<strong>the</strong>r methods to communicate best<br />
practice to be devised on key technology<br />
opportunities aimed at both strategic and<br />
technical levels and audiences.<br />
7 Recognis<strong>in</strong>g that it is not <strong>the</strong> role of government<br />
to mandate standards, it should use its<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence as far as possible to support open<br />
standards for content provision on all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and new platforms.<br />
98
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
CHAPTER<br />
16<br />
The challenge of changes <strong>in</strong><br />
customer behaviour<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is be<strong>in</strong>g affected by<br />
major changes <strong>in</strong> customer behaviour across<br />
<strong>the</strong> board. The battle for <strong>the</strong> attention of <strong>the</strong><br />
consumer is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>g fought with<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r established and new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
enterta<strong>in</strong>ment and ‘<strong>in</strong>fota<strong>in</strong>ment’ markets. The<br />
plethora of new services and competition from<br />
all quarters means that <strong>the</strong> consumer has less<br />
time and money left over to spend on pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
media publications. In addition, <strong>the</strong> patterns <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> way that consumers shop have<br />
consequences for <strong>the</strong> whole distribution and<br />
retail cha<strong>in</strong> of pr<strong>in</strong>ted products.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong> competition for <strong>the</strong> consumer’s<br />
time and money is hott<strong>in</strong>g up, forecasts <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
that disposable <strong>in</strong>come available for spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on media products will <strong>in</strong>crease by<br />
approximately 30% by <strong>the</strong> year 2005.<br />
Never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>the</strong> same source forecasts growth<br />
<strong>in</strong> revenues for <strong>the</strong> major pr<strong>in</strong>t media sectors<br />
rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.5% per annum for newspapers,<br />
through 2% per annum for magaz<strong>in</strong>es, to 5%<br />
per annum for books over <strong>the</strong> same period. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry must up <strong>the</strong> ante <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> battle for <strong>the</strong><br />
consumer and prepare itself now to exploit <strong>the</strong><br />
opportunities on <strong>the</strong> horizon.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation provision world, customers<br />
are requir<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>formation focused on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
particular needs. This results <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation not<br />
only hav<strong>in</strong>g to be supplied, but also put <strong>in</strong><br />
context. Competition to <strong>the</strong> traditional bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
or news publisher comes from new entrants,<br />
many of whom were formerly only customers of<br />
publishers; now <strong>the</strong>y compete. For example,<br />
law firms are offer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir clients packages of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation tailored specifically to <strong>the</strong>ir needs.<br />
The response to <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g demands of<br />
<strong>the</strong> customer will need to address four ma<strong>in</strong><br />
areas of competition for revenues from<br />
exist<strong>in</strong>g sources:<br />
• Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
customer<br />
• Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser more effectively<br />
• Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance <strong>in</strong> revenue streams<br />
• Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to <strong>the</strong> customer.<br />
Figure 16.1 Importance of a close<br />
relationship with <strong>the</strong> customer, three years<br />
Greatest<br />
potential<br />
Least<br />
potential<br />
Small<br />
potential<br />
Moderate<br />
potential<br />
Good potential<br />
Source Pira Survey<br />
Figure 16.2 Importance of a close<br />
relationship with <strong>the</strong> customer, 10 years<br />
Least<br />
potential<br />
Small<br />
potential<br />
Moderate<br />
potential<br />
Good<br />
potential<br />
Greatest<br />
potential<br />
Source Pira Survey<br />
100
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
16.1 Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> end customer<br />
The understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> customer’s habits and<br />
use of <strong>in</strong>formation is vital <strong>in</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right<br />
type of <strong>in</strong>formation to him at <strong>the</strong> right time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
right context. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, establish<strong>in</strong>g a closer<br />
relationship enables better profil<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
advertisers which is essential if <strong>the</strong> forecast step<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> direct mail advertis<strong>in</strong>g is not to turn<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a threat due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased availability of<br />
techniques to major corporations and retailers <strong>in</strong><br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g consumer usage patterns.<br />
16.1.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
There has been a recognition by publishers of<br />
<strong>the</strong> need to get closer to <strong>the</strong>ir end-users; 50%<br />
and 64% of <strong>the</strong> respondents to our survey<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated gett<strong>in</strong>g closer to <strong>the</strong> customer as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g an opportunity with great potential for<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> three years and 10 years<br />
respectively (Figures 16.1 and 16.2).<br />
The wide-adoption of Internet market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
technologies by most publishers (as evidenced<br />
by <strong>the</strong> e-commerce impact assessment) has<br />
pushed both small and large publishers closer<br />
to <strong>the</strong> customer.<br />
The newspapers and consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustries have focused on reader groups which<br />
has enabled <strong>the</strong>m to collect good statistics on<br />
<strong>the</strong>se groups and develop brands. This forms<br />
<strong>the</strong> basis for extension to more targeted<br />
knowledge about <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g and buy<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
of <strong>the</strong>se end customers.<br />
The bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
and directories, have started tailor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
products to <strong>in</strong>dividual users. The bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
model here has enabled <strong>the</strong> revenue streams to<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to flow from corporate or <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />
sources while o<strong>the</strong>r sources of revenue have<br />
been derived from additional services sold to<br />
<strong>the</strong> end user. Many bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers have<br />
created new end-user services attached to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
traditional brands which are result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
closer to <strong>the</strong> end customer and generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased revenues.<br />
16.1.2 Challenges<br />
Publishers almost across <strong>the</strong> board have not<br />
sold directly to end-users, but <strong>in</strong>stead use<br />
<strong>in</strong>termediaries for <strong>the</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g and distribution<br />
processes. This has built relatively efficient and<br />
cost effective supply cha<strong>in</strong>s, but has led to <strong>the</strong><br />
culture of, as a book publisher said, “let’s push<br />
as much as we can out <strong>the</strong>re, and hope<br />
someone will buy it”. This has been less so <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> case of magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers, but<br />
even here <strong>in</strong>formation has been collected <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of user groups ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
users, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for <strong>the</strong> purposes of driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue ra<strong>the</strong>r than understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> reader better and develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
an ongo<strong>in</strong>g relationship with <strong>the</strong>m. This is<br />
becom<strong>in</strong>g more important as demands on<br />
consumers’ time grow and loyalty weakens.<br />
The ability to target customers with<br />
contextualised, time sensitive content is<br />
essential to <strong>the</strong> successful exploitation of<br />
content on new platforms <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ward<strong>in</strong>g off<br />
<strong>the</strong> threat of free onl<strong>in</strong>e content. To do this,<br />
customers must be profiled very accurately and<br />
carefully. (See ‘Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance <strong>in</strong><br />
revenue streams’, Section 16.3.) There will be<br />
an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g need to understand what<br />
consumers and professional <strong>in</strong>formation users<br />
do on <strong>the</strong> Internet and how <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong><br />
medium. This is helped by <strong>the</strong> use of new<br />
technology which enables <strong>the</strong> easier profil<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry also needs to address <strong>the</strong> way it<br />
currently licences content to third parties and<br />
customers. As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry removes <strong>the</strong><br />
wrappers from its content it is important to make<br />
it easy for customers to licence and re-use <strong>the</strong><br />
content. There are two ma<strong>in</strong> aspects to this.<br />
1. Mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> deal to use content must be<br />
made simpler. The use of Digital Rights<br />
Management technology will help<br />
standardise licences and control of <strong>the</strong> terms<br />
made by <strong>the</strong> publisher and understood and<br />
adopted by licensees and customers. There<br />
are however, different licens<strong>in</strong>g bodies at<br />
present for books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>the</strong> one<br />
hand, and newspapers on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry should make an attempt to ><br />
101
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
simplify this structure and give customers<br />
one body with which to deal. Even if <strong>the</strong><br />
current multiple licens<strong>in</strong>g bodies rema<strong>in</strong>,<br />
effort must be made to make it easier for<br />
customers to use content legally.<br />
2. The use of encrypted content needs to be<br />
judicial. Some content will need heavy<br />
protection, while o<strong>the</strong>r content will need<br />
none at all. While understandable as a<br />
reaction to <strong>the</strong> threat of massive copyright<br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement, putt<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> emphasis on<br />
lock<strong>in</strong>g content up ever more tightly could<br />
backfire on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
The ability for publishers to profile<br />
customers more accurately and <strong>the</strong> use of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is threatened by regulatory<br />
moves at European level to restrict <strong>the</strong> use<br />
of cookies and enforce end customers to opt<br />
on <strong>the</strong>ir personal <strong>in</strong>formation be<strong>in</strong>g stored<br />
and re-used.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
8 Publishers need to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> Digital Rights<br />
Management, Content Management Systems and<br />
Customer Relationship Management technology<br />
to better understand <strong>the</strong>ir end-users’ behaviour.<br />
This will assist both sell<strong>in</strong>g products and services,<br />
as well as be<strong>in</strong>g able to better target customers<br />
for advertisers and direct market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
9 Industry must implement strategies throughout<br />
companies and trade associations to collect data<br />
about how <strong>in</strong>formation is used and its context, as<br />
well as <strong>the</strong> current sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />
25 In order to provide a simple way for customers<br />
to use content legally, UKPM should explore <strong>the</strong><br />
possible creation of a s<strong>in</strong>gle body to issue<br />
blanket licences.<br />
16.2 Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser<br />
more effectively<br />
The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole needs to be<br />
concerned about <strong>the</strong> steady decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> overall<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g market share s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, even<br />
though this has been accompanied by rises <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> actual amount of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />
accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. One of <strong>the</strong> most<br />
significant changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> share of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
spend<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>the</strong> last decade is <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>in</strong><br />
direct mail advertis<strong>in</strong>g. The move towards<br />
personalised direct mail is ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g pace,<br />
based on response rates 36% higher than on<br />
personalised direct mail. The personalisation of<br />
direct mail is still <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fancy and more<br />
sophisticated personalisation can be expected<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 10 years.<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> newspaper publishers we<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviewed put it as follows: “National<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g costs have now become so high,<br />
advertisers are ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves what is <strong>the</strong><br />
best way to spend <strong>the</strong> available budget. This is<br />
not just a cyclical change, but a structural<br />
change towards targeted market<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
The advent of new commercial radio stations<br />
is a ma<strong>in</strong> driver for <strong>the</strong> use of radio, although<br />
much of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g is purchased nationally<br />
even for local radio stations. The ease of<br />
purchase of this and <strong>the</strong> ability to target local<br />
audiences from a central purchase is a major<br />
factor <strong>in</strong> advertisers choos<strong>in</strong>g radio.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> statistics show a consistent<br />
level of TV advertis<strong>in</strong>g which has recently<br />
become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly fragmented due to <strong>the</strong><br />
proliferation of satellite and digital TV channels.<br />
An opportunity exists here to promote<br />
newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es as a valuable,<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated advertis<strong>in</strong>g medium. There needs to<br />
be a concerted campaign to raise awareness<br />
among advertisers of <strong>the</strong> attractiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t media as vehicles for cost-effective<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
A newspaper <strong>in</strong>terviewee questioned: “How<br />
smart is <strong>the</strong> national press at work<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r?<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry needs to f<strong>in</strong>d ways to overcome<br />
<strong>the</strong> barriers <strong>in</strong> order to make itself more<br />
competitive <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g its strengths to attract<br />
advertisers.”<br />
This was echoed by a magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher:<br />
“The share of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g market for<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es is 6%, it should be about 15%. But<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g directors prefer TV where <strong>the</strong>y can<br />
hide more costs. Yet magaz<strong>in</strong>es receive about<br />
20% of <strong>the</strong> spend on food products. This needs<br />
to expanded to o<strong>the</strong>r product types.”<br />
The world of classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g has been<br />
102
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
most affected by <strong>the</strong> Internet. Recruitment,<br />
hous<strong>in</strong>g and auto trad<strong>in</strong>g are major sources of<br />
classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g, particularly for regional<br />
newspapers and specialist magaz<strong>in</strong>es. There<br />
has been and still is a threat of<br />
dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by new start-ups such as<br />
Monsterboard and exist<strong>in</strong>g players <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />
such as estate agents. <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> companies<br />
who rely on classifieds for major parts of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
revenues are migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>esses onl<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
primarily to defend <strong>the</strong>ir exist<strong>in</strong>g position. This is<br />
not to say that newspaper advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />
is likely to dry up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short-term, but migration<br />
will occur over a number of years, if not<br />
decades. There are parallels here with <strong>the</strong><br />
problems that were faced by <strong>the</strong> STM <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s. The challenge fac<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g classified ads is to get through <strong>the</strong><br />
transition from paper only to electronic only at<br />
reasonable levels of <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />
As an <strong>in</strong>dustry executive <strong>in</strong>terviewed said:<br />
“People are complacent because of <strong>the</strong> dotcom<br />
crash, but Internet use is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. We are<br />
still <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early stages of onl<strong>in</strong>e, explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capabilities and potential. Yet newspapers might<br />
react by downshift<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> grounds that <strong>the</strong><br />
threat has dim<strong>in</strong>ished.”<br />
Fish4 has helped to stave off competition and<br />
has been a valuable <strong>in</strong>itiative, but local<br />
newspapers must not be complacent and must<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop much stronger local-based<br />
value-added services to fur<strong>the</strong>r defend and<br />
streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>ir position.<br />
Companies must look for <strong>in</strong>cremental onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
revenue on top of <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>in</strong>t-based advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
which adds to <strong>the</strong> value proposition for<br />
advertisers and readers alike. As an advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
executive said: “Magaz<strong>in</strong>es need to exploit <strong>the</strong><br />
skill set of promot<strong>in</strong>g products <strong>in</strong> context to<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir users.”<br />
This can <strong>in</strong>clude services such as publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e as soon as its submitted, and add<strong>in</strong>g<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r relevant <strong>in</strong>formation sources related to <strong>the</strong><br />
local area. The full transition may require<br />
refocus<strong>in</strong>g of journalistic skills <strong>in</strong>to not just<br />
provid<strong>in</strong>g local news, but also provid<strong>in</strong>g local<br />
knowledge. Giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> customer simple<br />
enhancements while migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
over a number of years to a mixed pr<strong>in</strong>t/onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
model has proven very successful <strong>in</strong> STM<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
16.3 Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance of<br />
revenue streams<br />
The consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses rely for a significant<br />
portion of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>come on advertis<strong>in</strong>g (see Part<br />
1). In good economic times, this produces<br />
excellent revenues and profit. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
because of its cyclical nature, advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>come is an unreliable source of <strong>in</strong>come, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is some evidence of structural shifts.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it has proven very difficult to<br />
generate sufficient onl<strong>in</strong>e advertis<strong>in</strong>g to susta<strong>in</strong><br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e products, even if <strong>the</strong>re has been a<br />
significant demand for <strong>the</strong> product.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, handl<strong>in</strong>g tens of<br />
thousands of subscriptions has not been seen<br />
as an attractive proposition due to <strong>the</strong> high cost<br />
of postal charges, discounts on <strong>the</strong> cover price<br />
that need to be offered and overhead <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with a large number of subscribers. Some<br />
publishers argue that <strong>the</strong> potential benefits of<br />
up-sell<strong>in</strong>g and cross-sell<strong>in</strong>g could not offset this<br />
to any extent, but o<strong>the</strong>rs have suggested that<br />
this is partly a self-fulfill<strong>in</strong>g prophecy <strong>in</strong> that staff<br />
are not tra<strong>in</strong>ed to focus on this potential and so<br />
up to now results have been disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. If<br />
companies are to reduce reliance on cyclical<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come and make headway towards<br />
runn<strong>in</strong>g profitable websites, subscriptions are a<br />
must. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, subscriptions (particularly<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e) are essential <strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g able to profile <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual end-user <strong>in</strong>stead of just larger<br />
demographic groups.<br />
Moreover, <strong>the</strong> move to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
proportion of subscriptions would reduce <strong>the</strong><br />
amount of wastage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, which<br />
would <strong>in</strong> itself cut costs as well as br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environmental benefits.<br />
16.3.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
The strength and efficiency of <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />
channel for magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers<br />
><br />
103
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
results <strong>in</strong> high numbers of purchases through<br />
newsagents and retailers at a relatively low cost<br />
(although as expla<strong>in</strong>ed elsewhere, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
issues here).<br />
The bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
have managed to implement successfully<br />
subscription-based services, although <strong>the</strong>y do<br />
deal with fewer pay<strong>in</strong>g customers than would be<br />
expected from consumer titles. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re are some niche consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es that<br />
have developed very profitable subscriptionbased<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />
A subscription model gives a more stable<br />
source of <strong>in</strong>come and improves cashflow. The<br />
cost of fulfillment, however, can make it too<br />
expensive to implement successfully. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet as a market<strong>in</strong>g and order<strong>in</strong>g tool can<br />
reduce <strong>the</strong> cost significantly as well as<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> number of subscribers.<br />
As one consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher stated:<br />
“The Internet version of our magaz<strong>in</strong>e is driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people to subscribe to <strong>the</strong> paper version.”<br />
A newspaper publisher went fur<strong>the</strong>r: “The<br />
future of our onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess will be based on a<br />
subscription model. The revenues generated by<br />
display advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> newspapers will not be<br />
affected by onl<strong>in</strong>e, but subscription models have<br />
to play a major role <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e offer<strong>in</strong>gs.”<br />
Hav<strong>in</strong>g a more direct relationship with <strong>the</strong> end<br />
user will also enable sp<strong>in</strong>-offs <strong>in</strong> activities such<br />
as direct mail and profil<strong>in</strong>g. The use of retailers<br />
such as CTNs, supermarkets and bookshops as<br />
<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> sales channel, means that publishers<br />
are endanger<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir ability to profile users. A<br />
subscription sales model is one step towards<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g this.<br />
In summary, <strong>the</strong> head of one lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g company stated his dream<br />
scenario to be: “The Internet revolutionizes<br />
subscriptions, whereby customers subscribe to<br />
<strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e versions by direct debit and still<br />
purchase pr<strong>in</strong>ted magaz<strong>in</strong>es. Better pric<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
also offered to subscribers and publishers get<br />
closer to <strong>the</strong>ir end-users.”<br />
16.3.2 Challenges<br />
UK consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have a<br />
lower rate of subscription than <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
publishers and B2B publishers are more<br />
dependent on advertis<strong>in</strong>g (due to a higher rate<br />
of free subscriptions).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ABN.AMRO/Screen Digest<br />
report Mediaphile 2010, <strong>the</strong> expenditure on pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 10 years is likely to be flat,<br />
yet subscriptions to digital TV, Internet and<br />
mobile phones will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow and<br />
“subscriptions have emerged as <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />
source of media revenue”. It is imperative that<br />
<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry to put itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
position to take some of this pie. Subscriptions<br />
are also less vulnerable to recession than oneoff<br />
discretionary purchases.<br />
A Pira study on <strong>the</strong> impact of advertis<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t shows <strong>the</strong>re will be an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g shift<br />
towards direct mail over <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g decade<br />
largely at <strong>the</strong> expense of newspapers and TV<br />
(see Figure 16.3).<br />
Fulfillment costs of subscriptions has been <strong>the</strong><br />
reason cited by many magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers as a<br />
major reason for <strong>the</strong> lack of emphasis given to<br />
<strong>the</strong>m. Postal service charges and cost of order<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g are key elements <strong>in</strong> this.<br />
One consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e executive<br />
compla<strong>in</strong>ed: “The costs of fulfill<strong>in</strong>g subscriptions<br />
make <strong>the</strong>m currently uneconomic. Up to 50% of<br />
subscription revenues go on postage and<br />
pack<strong>in</strong>g alone.”<br />
As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry moves towards creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g numbers of onl<strong>in</strong>e services, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
substantial subscriptions to pr<strong>in</strong>t products will<br />
only help <strong>the</strong> process. As has been<br />
demonstrated by journal and B2B publishers, it<br />
104
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 16.3 Projected changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market share<br />
of advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g five years<br />
6, %<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
-3<br />
-4<br />
-5<br />
Telemarket<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sponsorship<br />
WAP&SMS<br />
Email market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Internet<br />
Radio<br />
Broadcast/cable TV<br />
iDTV<br />
Instore POP<br />
C<strong>in</strong>ema<br />
Outdoor/posters<br />
Catalogues/Directories<br />
Brochures<br />
Direct Mail<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es B2B<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Consumer<br />
Newspapers<br />
Source Pira International ‘Future roles of pr<strong>in</strong>t and digital media <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet age’ 2002<br />
is much easier to migrate an exist<strong>in</strong>g papersubscription<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess to onl<strong>in</strong>e based on a<br />
subscription bus<strong>in</strong>ess model than it is to migrate<br />
one based on an advertis<strong>in</strong>g model. Several<br />
newspaper publishers and niche consumer<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es have already <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
will<strong>in</strong>gness to adopt onl<strong>in</strong>e subscription models.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> words of <strong>the</strong> head of an onl<strong>in</strong>e aggregator<br />
“<strong>the</strong> only way to make money onl<strong>in</strong>e, at least<br />
today, is by subscriptions”.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
10 Relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors to lobby for carefully<br />
managed <strong>in</strong>troduction of competition <strong>in</strong> mail<br />
services to meet cost/efficiency goals without<br />
threaten<strong>in</strong>g universal delivery.<br />
11 O<strong>the</strong>r routes to <strong>the</strong> customer must be developed<br />
and/or streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> order to protect diversity<br />
and <strong>in</strong>novation and to support frequency of<br />
purchase. For example:<br />
• Professional alternative home delivery services<br />
should be created<br />
• Subscriptions should be extended,<br />
• Targeted direct mail should be exploited and<br />
supported by Internet-based CRM techniques<br />
12 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> trade associations, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> partners need to accelerate adoption<br />
of e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives and standards to<br />
facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation exchange throughout <strong>the</strong><br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
><br />
105
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
16.4 Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to<br />
<strong>the</strong> customer<br />
In common with any bus<strong>in</strong>ess, publish<strong>in</strong>g needs<br />
to secure its routes to <strong>the</strong> customer. <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
faces some unique challenges <strong>in</strong> that many of<br />
its products are highly time-critical – a<br />
newspaper which doesn’t arrive on <strong>the</strong><br />
newsstand to catch <strong>the</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g commuter or <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> shop <strong>in</strong> time for delivery to a home is a<br />
useless commodity. Consumers expect <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es to appear on certa<strong>in</strong> days of <strong>the</strong><br />
week. In <strong>the</strong> book trade <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> enormous<br />
challenge of many thousands of unique<br />
products to be kept track of through <strong>the</strong> process<br />
of order<strong>in</strong>g, shipp<strong>in</strong>g, sale and return. Many<br />
orders are very small, but when a customer<br />
wants a particular book at a particular time, and<br />
noth<strong>in</strong>g else is a substitute.<br />
As a result of <strong>the</strong> very large <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
number of magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles and book titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
last ten to twenty years, both <strong>the</strong>se sectors face<br />
an issue with <strong>the</strong> availability of retail shelf space<br />
to display <strong>the</strong> range that is available.<br />
Newspapers face issues about <strong>the</strong> number and<br />
site of outlets. All sectors face consequences<br />
from <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> consumer shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
and <strong>the</strong> shift <strong>in</strong> retail structure.<br />
16.4.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper publishers all made<br />
<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t that <strong>the</strong> UK newstrade is one of <strong>the</strong><br />
most efficient and vibrant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. They<br />
contrasted it with countries like <strong>the</strong> US, where<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es have to be delivered by post<br />
because <strong>the</strong>re are many areas where <strong>the</strong>y<br />
could not be purchased <strong>in</strong> a shop. To quote one<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher:<br />
“The UK newstrade has to be seen <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational context. They do a fantastic job.<br />
There is still a vibrant newstrade with a healthy<br />
CTN sector, though shifts are occurr<strong>in</strong>g between<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependents and multiples. The cost of entry to<br />
<strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e market is still relatively low – third<br />
party distributors do a good job both for big<br />
publishers and start-ups. Helps to keep a flow of<br />
new ideas. If you were to try to launch straight<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> US market it could cost $50m to<br />
establish a viable level of subscriptions aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
an entry cost of £3-£4m here.”<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher said:<br />
“In <strong>the</strong> US <strong>the</strong>y lose money on every copy <strong>the</strong>y<br />
sell by subscription. They are forced to do it to<br />
build readership for advertisers and because <strong>the</strong><br />
country is so big that many people wouldn’t get<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es any o<strong>the</strong>r way. We wouldn’t want to<br />
go that route. Brita<strong>in</strong> has an extremely efficient<br />
newstrade distribution.”<br />
The UK is a densely populated country and<br />
is well served with news outlets, although <strong>the</strong><br />
number has started decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> mix is<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g (see challenges below).<br />
For its part, <strong>the</strong> book trade has successfully<br />
handled a vast <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> numbers of<br />
titles available, with <strong>the</strong> aid of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g use<br />
of e-commerce processes with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>. Internet booksell<strong>in</strong>g has been develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
as a significant new channel, which appears to<br />
be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market and help<strong>in</strong>g to sell<br />
backlist books which would not o<strong>the</strong>rwise f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
shelf space.<br />
The complexity of <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong> and<br />
<strong>the</strong> issue of returns, which add considerably to<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s costs, persist, but at least <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry has faced up to <strong>the</strong> problems with <strong>the</strong><br />
Publishers’ Association/Booksellers’ Association<br />
supported report on <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
1997 and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives that have flowed from it.<br />
Books have also found new outlets <strong>in</strong><br />
supermarkets and garden centres and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
non-traditional stockists. Though this ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
favours discounted bestsellers, <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
channel <strong>the</strong>oretically compensates. The<br />
predicted catastrophe for <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
booksellers as a result of <strong>the</strong> end<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Net<br />
Book Agreement has not materialised, although<br />
some publishers believe that <strong>the</strong> widespread<br />
entry of US booksellers means that <strong>the</strong> end<br />
game has not been reached.<br />
16.4.2 Challenges<br />
There are a series of <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked challenges to<br />
<strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
They centre around changes <strong>in</strong> retail structure<br />
and power.<br />
106
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
• Chang<strong>in</strong>g shopp<strong>in</strong>g patterns and chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
retailer mix (see table 16.1). New high volume<br />
outlets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of out of town shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
centres and supermarkets and decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs (confectioners, tobacconist,<br />
newsagents). Decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> high street now<br />
seem to be slow<strong>in</strong>g, but only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ’better’<br />
high streets.<br />
• Growth <strong>in</strong> power of super retailers, both<br />
those with high ranges of magaz<strong>in</strong>es (WHS)<br />
and those with high volume, but small<br />
ranges (supermarkets)<br />
• Fall<strong>in</strong>g retail marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
• Pressure from super retailers for special<br />
national distribution arrangements which would<br />
exacerbate <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of primary news<br />
providers.<br />
The consequences of <strong>the</strong>se changes and<br />
pressures are different for newspapers and<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es, even though <strong>the</strong>y derive from <strong>the</strong><br />
same causes.<br />
Table 16.1 Number of press retailers by type<br />
Retailer<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />
1992<br />
2000<br />
Change<br />
Convenience<br />
stores<br />
Store trad<strong>in</strong>g 7 days a week, approx 14 hours per<br />
day. Varied stock which may <strong>in</strong>clude food, news, off<br />
licence, chemist, video hire<br />
2178<br />
7794<br />
+5616<br />
Petrol stations<br />
Shops or kiosks trad<strong>in</strong>g on petrol station forecourts<br />
1469<br />
5791<br />
+4322<br />
Supermarkets/<br />
hypermarkets<br />
Large self service grocery and household stores,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g kiosks outside checkout areas<br />
1334<br />
3751<br />
+2417<br />
Grocery and<br />
general stores<br />
Traditional grocery stores with majority of space<br />
dedicated to grocery items<br />
6714<br />
7633<br />
+919<br />
Travel po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
Airports, rail/bus/tube stations and motorway service<br />
stations<br />
979<br />
1082<br />
+103<br />
News store<br />
Major stores with many departments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
1823<br />
1829<br />
+6<br />
Seasonal po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
Only trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> holiday periods (e.g. holiday camps)<br />
400<br />
404<br />
+4<br />
Roundsman<br />
Trades by delivery only<br />
1249<br />
1201<br />
-48<br />
Street po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Street seller or kiosk o<strong>the</strong>r than at travel po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
490<br />
296<br />
-194<br />
News primary<br />
News is primary profit contributor <strong>in</strong> a substantial<br />
shop with a quality display of newspapers and<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
9561<br />
8612<br />
-949<br />
News secondary<br />
Smaller than primary, more likely to be <strong>in</strong> a<br />
neighbourhood location<br />
17,253<br />
15,053<br />
-2200<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
Unclassified<br />
1024<br />
1175<br />
+151<br />
TOTAL<br />
44,474<br />
54,261<br />
+10,147<br />
Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g/ANMW<br />
><br />
107
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
Newspapers<br />
The decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary<br />
news outlets (partly due to conversion to<br />
convenience format) threatens home delivery<br />
and frequency of newspaper purchase.<br />
One regional newspaper group told us: “The<br />
problem for newspapers is <strong>the</strong> pure number of<br />
convenient outlets, as newspapers are a<br />
purchase made on <strong>the</strong> way somewhere.”<br />
As we noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on newspapers<br />
above (statistical analysis) <strong>the</strong> extent of home<br />
delivery has decl<strong>in</strong>ed substantially s<strong>in</strong>ce 1992.<br />
Frequency of purchase is doubly impacted by<br />
<strong>the</strong> loss of home delivery and <strong>the</strong> loss of outlets<br />
for impulse purchase.<br />
Figure 16.4 Number of retail outlets<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g newspapers<br />
60000<br />
50000<br />
40000<br />
30000<br />
20000<br />
10000<br />
1994<br />
1996<br />
1998<br />
Source Association of Magaz<strong>in</strong>e and Newspaper Wholesalers<br />
2000<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Here <strong>the</strong> threat is to range and to <strong>the</strong> entry of<br />
new launches on to <strong>the</strong> market. The problem is<br />
particularly acute for smaller publishers. A<br />
lead<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry executive expressed<br />
<strong>the</strong> problem to us like this: “There is great<br />
concern among smaller publishers about <strong>the</strong><br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> numbers of <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
newsagents as a result of <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong><br />
shopp<strong>in</strong>g patterns. Although supermarkets and<br />
petrol stations have filled <strong>the</strong> gap <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
volume, <strong>the</strong>y do not carry <strong>the</strong> range of<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependents do. On average a<br />
supermarket will stock only 300-400 magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
and even <strong>the</strong> biggest will only take 700. There<br />
are 3000 regular titles.<br />
This is likely to damage both exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
specialist titles, and new launches, as it will be<br />
impossible to get visibility. Aga<strong>in</strong> this will affect<br />
smaller publishers more severely as <strong>the</strong>y will<br />
not be able to use <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong>ir big sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
titles to ensure that smaller titles or new<br />
launches are stocked by <strong>the</strong> supermarkets.<br />
There is a high degree of frustration among <strong>the</strong><br />
smaller publishers. These publishers are often<br />
<strong>the</strong> source of new ideas and new opportunities<br />
for <strong>the</strong> market as a whole, so it matters to<br />
everyone.”<br />
This view is supported by <strong>the</strong> chart (Figure<br />
16.5) which shows <strong>the</strong> number of retailers<br />
handl<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es by sizeband of circulation.<br />
Figure 16.5 More retailers favour large<br />
sell<strong>in</strong>g titles<br />
500-1000<br />
100-250<br />
50-75<br />
>25<br />
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000<br />
Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
108
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
The major expansion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of retailers<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s favoured <strong>the</strong> larger sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
titles. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />
smaller specialist titles saw a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
number of retail outlets handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir titles.<br />
16.4.3 Supermarkets and super<br />
news retailers<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers also have concerns<br />
about <strong>the</strong> way that supermarkets handle<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e stock, though <strong>the</strong>y told us that this<br />
varies substantially between <strong>the</strong> cha<strong>in</strong>s, with<br />
some dedicat<strong>in</strong>g specialists to it and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />
allow<strong>in</strong>g it to be done by whoever is available<br />
at any time. They are also worried about<br />
supermarket power: “The power of<br />
supermarkets is a problem – <strong>the</strong>y act as<br />
gatekeepers to <strong>the</strong> customer, and <strong>the</strong>ir power<br />
to ’delist’ magaz<strong>in</strong>es is worry<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
A number of publishers compla<strong>in</strong>ed about <strong>the</strong><br />
behaviour of WH Smith <strong>in</strong> relation to demands<br />
for promotional payments, which <strong>the</strong>y saw as an<br />
abuse of <strong>the</strong>ir market position.<br />
One consumer publisher told us: “When WHS<br />
first <strong>in</strong>vented promotional activity like ’f<strong>in</strong>s’ and<br />
’Hot off <strong>the</strong> press’ standouts it worked well for<br />
publishers. Now if you won’t pay for f<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong>n<br />
<strong>the</strong>y threaten to delist you.”<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r commented: “They can hold <strong>the</strong><br />
smaller titles to ransom <strong>in</strong> terms of cost. They<br />
also are charg<strong>in</strong>g bigger publishers more for<br />
promotional space e.g. for new launches.<br />
Smaller magaz<strong>in</strong>es can’t afford to compla<strong>in</strong> to<br />
<strong>the</strong> OFT – <strong>the</strong>y would be out of bus<strong>in</strong>ess by <strong>the</strong><br />
time <strong>the</strong> case was heard, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y depend<br />
almost totally on WHS.“<br />
16.4.4 Postal services<br />
There is ano<strong>the</strong>r set of issues around postal<br />
services that affect magaz<strong>in</strong>es and books. Many<br />
publishers told us <strong>the</strong> postal service was:<br />
• Too expensive<br />
• Becom<strong>in</strong>g less efficient<br />
• Changes its rates with <strong>in</strong>sufficient notice,<br />
affect<strong>in</strong>g publishers’ budgets and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The state of <strong>the</strong> postal service impacts on <strong>the</strong><br />
sectors <strong>in</strong> several ways:<br />
• It affects current operations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
customer relationships where publishers rely<br />
on it for delivery of subscription copies<br />
• It affects <strong>the</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness of publishers to <strong>in</strong>vest<br />
<strong>in</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g more customers onto a subscription<br />
basis, to offset <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
areas of <strong>the</strong> newstrade<br />
• It raises <strong>the</strong> cost of do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess for book<br />
publishers who now ship orders <strong>in</strong> smaller lots<br />
<strong>in</strong> order to respond more accurately to<br />
customer demand and reduce <strong>the</strong> levels of<br />
<strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
In all <strong>the</strong>se ways, it is problematic precisely<br />
because it is prevent<strong>in</strong>g or hamper<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />
towards greater responsiveness to <strong>the</strong> customer<br />
and closer customer relationships, which we<br />
have emphasised as critical issues for<br />
publishers <strong>in</strong> a number of places <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />
Several publishers expressed frustration that it<br />
is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> common <strong>in</strong>terest of <strong>the</strong> publishers and<br />
Consignia/Royal Mail to satisfy and grow<br />
demand for pr<strong>in</strong>ted material through <strong>the</strong> post.<br />
16.4.5 Conclusions and actions<br />
It would be easy to see <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
patterns as an <strong>in</strong>exorable trend and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
consider that <strong>the</strong>re is little or noth<strong>in</strong>g that can be<br />
done. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
distribution companies and trade bodies) is<br />
already attempt<strong>in</strong>g to support <strong>the</strong> better quality<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent newsagent through jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />
and promotional activities. Given <strong>the</strong> potential<br />
impact on consumer choice and <strong>in</strong>novation of<br />
sharp fur<strong>the</strong>r decl<strong>in</strong>es, this is an effort well worth<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> our view.<br />
It is also important to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> e-commerce <strong>in</strong><br />
order to try to meet <strong>the</strong> concerns of <strong>the</strong> major<br />
retailers, but not at <strong>the</strong> expense of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dependents The Government and competition<br />
authorities need to be sensitive to <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
picture <strong>in</strong> relation to consumer choice, diversity<br />
and <strong>in</strong>novation when mak<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Because it will improve efficiency and market<br />
responsiveness, e-commerce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> should also help to reduce <strong>the</strong> level of ><br />
109
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
unsold product which has to be returned and<br />
destroyed. It is also vital for publishers to look to<br />
<strong>the</strong> future The action po<strong>in</strong>ts here supplement<br />
<strong>the</strong> ones conclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> section on achiev<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
better balance <strong>in</strong> revenue streams, above.<br />
Although publishers are right to stress <strong>the</strong><br />
cost-effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g newstrade,<br />
and seek to protect it, <strong>the</strong>y also need to tackle<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> obstacles to exploit<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r routes<br />
to <strong>the</strong> customer and consider o<strong>the</strong>r collateral<br />
benefits, such as <strong>in</strong>creased customer loyalty<br />
and waste reduction.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
13 Industry and distribution trade associations to<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support <strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs with<br />
promotional campaigns, clubs and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>novations.<br />
14 Supermarkets must <strong>in</strong>clude magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
newspapers and books <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supermarket code.<br />
This code also needs to be made more robust.<br />
15 Build on exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> report “Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />
Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize” – use this opportunity to<br />
<strong>in</strong>ject fresh momentum.<br />
110
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
CHAPTER<br />
17<br />
The challenge of digital media<br />
17.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />
Digital technologies are fundamental to <strong>the</strong><br />
future of publish<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>the</strong>y affect<br />
different elements of publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong><br />
customer and <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> product and <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess model <strong>in</strong> different ways and at different<br />
speeds. The characterisation of formats <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter 12 <strong>in</strong> Part 1 is an attempt to capture<br />
some of this <strong>in</strong> relation to end customers. The<br />
broad conclusion from that would be that <strong>the</strong><br />
segments most impacted by digital media are<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g, but <strong>the</strong>re are also significant impacts<br />
on broadsheet national newspapers and local<br />
newspapers. Arguably, consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
and fiction books are <strong>the</strong> least impacted,<br />
although one should be careful to draw a<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ction between lifestyle glossy magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
general women’s, TV-related and celebrity<br />
weeklies on <strong>the</strong> one hand and <strong>in</strong>terest focused<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, particularly those <strong>in</strong><br />
more technology or youth-oriented segments.<br />
An overview of <strong>the</strong> responses of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Internet was given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 10.<br />
Our <strong>in</strong>terviews revealed a pattern of attitudes<br />
that are related to <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which digital<br />
technologies have been exploited so far by <strong>the</strong><br />
different segments of publish<strong>in</strong>g. Many book<br />
publishers were affected by <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial losses<br />
<strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir enthusiasm for CD-ROM<br />
development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-90s, and so tend to be<br />
cautious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir approach to e-books, although<br />
not necessarily to pr<strong>in</strong>t-on-demand. On <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>y perceive <strong>the</strong> Internet positively,<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly because Internet booksellers such as<br />
Amazon are seen to be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market and<br />
also sell<strong>in</strong>g books from <strong>the</strong> back list that would<br />
not f<strong>in</strong>d shelf space at retail. For <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet – so far anyway – has represented an<br />
additional revenue stream, or at <strong>the</strong> least has<br />
not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> much cost. These<br />
generalisations do not apply to journal and STM<br />
publishers, who have moved much fur<strong>the</strong>r down<br />
<strong>the</strong> track of deliver<strong>in</strong>g content electronically. For<br />
<strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> Internet is a major channel to <strong>the</strong><br />
customer, with correspond<strong>in</strong>gly high expenditure<br />
and revenues. By contrast, many national<br />
newspaper and some magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers<br />
have made very large expenditures on onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
development, and <strong>in</strong> most cases, although not<br />
all, <strong>the</strong>y have seen virtually no revenue as a<br />
result. This is bound to colour <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes to<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g content for broadband, for example.<br />
At a more basic level, <strong>the</strong> Internet and its<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g protocols and associated languages<br />
(TCP/IP, browsers, HTML, XML, email) have<br />
already had a huge impact on <strong>the</strong> processes of<br />
production and on <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, even where<br />
<strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al product is a book, newspaper or<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>e pr<strong>in</strong>ted on paper, delivered physically<br />
to a retailer and carried home by <strong>the</strong> consumer.<br />
Regardless of attitudes to <strong>the</strong> potential of new<br />
platforms to generate revenue, publishers are<br />
positive about <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong>se technologies<br />
with<strong>in</strong> production and supply cha<strong>in</strong> distribution.<br />
Many publishers have been enthusiastic <strong>in</strong><br />
embrac<strong>in</strong>g new technologies and quick to see<br />
<strong>the</strong> opportunities both for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
efficiency and for creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative products<br />
and services. The evidence is <strong>the</strong>re on <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet for all to see, and to a lesser extent on<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r new platforms such as <strong>in</strong>teractive TV and<br />
mobile. Our questionnaire confirms this <strong>in</strong><br />
show<strong>in</strong>g 78% of respondents have a website<br />
for content delivery, ra<strong>the</strong>r than merely for<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation purposes. Attitudes to broadband,<br />
Digital TV and third generation mobile platforms<br />
will be explored <strong>in</strong> a later section.<br />
17.2 Challenges<br />
A major challenge comes from changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
competitive environment, particularly<br />
dis<strong>in</strong>termediation (e.g. rights retention by<br />
authors) and competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g parts of<br />
<strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>, and from perceived sources of<br />
unfair competition, such as <strong>the</strong> BBC, <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
government and o<strong>the</strong>r public sector bodies.<br />
17.2.1 The chang<strong>in</strong>g competitive landscape<br />
Digital technologies have created what might<br />
be termed a new competitive ‘h<strong>in</strong>terland’ for<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g companies. Whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
world, newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es, TV and radio<br />
form separate ‘channels’ with <strong>the</strong>ir own modes<br />
112
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
of use and competitive advantages, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Web (whe<strong>the</strong>r delivered over fat or th<strong>in</strong><br />
pipes) <strong>the</strong>y sit side by side. Although not all<br />
sites are created equal – those with powerful<br />
offl<strong>in</strong>e brands and assets can br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se to<br />
bear onl<strong>in</strong>e – <strong>the</strong> Web is an arena where strong<br />
brands that have not competed head to head<br />
before, start to do so. This can have an<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational dimension – say The Times versus<br />
The New York Times, or CNN and <strong>the</strong> BBC, or<br />
be across sectors.<br />
The web also (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory) permits customers to<br />
reach suppliers without need<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediaries,<br />
or via new <strong>in</strong>termediaries, and vice versa. This<br />
could take <strong>the</strong> form of authors try<strong>in</strong>g to dispense<br />
with publishers, where <strong>the</strong> author, or perhaps<br />
journal, already has a big brand. It may <strong>in</strong>volve<br />
<strong>the</strong> dissolution of exist<strong>in</strong>g bundles of content,<br />
such as <strong>the</strong> journal, <strong>in</strong>to its constituent parts,<br />
with customers buy<strong>in</strong>g only <strong>the</strong> part <strong>the</strong>y want.<br />
Aggregators of various k<strong>in</strong>ds already exist to<br />
facilitate this <strong>in</strong> both STM and academic<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply of bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
It has already taken <strong>the</strong> form of groups of<br />
advertisers, such as real estate agents and<br />
recruitment agencies, launch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir own onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
services to reach customers directly. Although<br />
<strong>the</strong> issue of ‘dis<strong>in</strong>termediation/re<strong>in</strong>termediation’<br />
has apparently receded as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
demise of most onl<strong>in</strong>e-only start-ups, it would be<br />
foolish to be complacent, especially <strong>in</strong> relation<br />
to classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Onl<strong>in</strong>e penetration is<br />
still ris<strong>in</strong>g, a new generation used to <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />
technologies is matur<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong> functionality of<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e classifieds is set to <strong>in</strong>crease. One lett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
agency reports that 40% of its leads come from<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e. <strong>Home</strong>buyers’ and sellers’ packs are on<br />
<strong>the</strong> horizon, and valuation and survey<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation, toge<strong>the</strong>r (eventually) with video will<br />
make property searches very much easier<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e than offl<strong>in</strong>e. Job search<strong>in</strong>g is one of <strong>the</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>cipal uses of corporate web sites, while<br />
major companies are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir human resources functions electronically,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g handl<strong>in</strong>g all aspects of recruitment,<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g specialist software. This will ultimately<br />
tend to favour onl<strong>in</strong>e recruitment. This could<br />
particularly affect some of <strong>the</strong> national<br />
broadsheets. There is also <strong>the</strong> threat that local<br />
government and health jobs will be advertised<br />
directly by councils and via NHS sites. It is<br />
notable that papers such as The Guardian<br />
have taken considerable steps to try to<br />
protect this vital revenue stream by creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
content and even more crucially, functionality,<br />
which considerably extends what is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ted paper.<br />
It should be obvious that anyth<strong>in</strong>g that tends<br />
to separate advertis<strong>in</strong>g from editorial content<br />
has <strong>the</strong> potential to break <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />
of <strong>the</strong> newspaper, if <strong>the</strong> newspaper does not<br />
command that advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue stream <strong>in</strong><br />
its o<strong>the</strong>r form.<br />
The web can permit elements of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> to become competitive with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
suppliers or customers, for example, customers<br />
of Reuters’ news wholesale bus<strong>in</strong>ess becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />
wholesalers <strong>in</strong> turn to o<strong>the</strong>r sites. It encourages<br />
all k<strong>in</strong>ds of companies to become publishers:<br />
law firms, f<strong>in</strong>ancial services companies and<br />
consultancies, even supermarkets are<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g much more extensive content as a<br />
means of reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g clients or as a customer<br />
service, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a revenue generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exercise. These companies could become<br />
customers of publishers <strong>in</strong> a new sense<br />
however – customers for <strong>the</strong>ir content but also<br />
for <strong>the</strong>ir expertise <strong>in</strong> content handl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
editorial selection.<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation suppliers are also<br />
driv<strong>in</strong>g forward to <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>the</strong>ir services tightly<br />
with<strong>in</strong> customers’ IT systems, for example <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tranets, Enterprise Information Portals or<br />
Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g systems. In <strong>the</strong><br />
process <strong>the</strong>y have to get to grips with<br />
technology issues which would never before<br />
have been part of publishers’ core<br />
competences. Reuters for example produces<br />
software tool kits and offers consultancy advice,<br />
not only to <strong>in</strong>tegrate Reuters’ <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>to<br />
companies’ EIPs or <strong>in</strong>tranets, but also to<br />
organise companies’ own <strong>in</strong>formation. They<br />
have formed partnerships with EIP<br />
113
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
companies, but also f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong><br />
competition with software suppliers and systems<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrators. It is a path which has also been<br />
taken by TSO, which manages <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />
even services <strong>the</strong> clients of o<strong>the</strong>r organisations.<br />
As bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e and directory<br />
publishers expand <strong>the</strong>ir specialised offer<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>in</strong>to higher value areas via <strong>the</strong> Internet, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
also beg<strong>in</strong> to compete more directly with <strong>the</strong><br />
general bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation vendors, although<br />
<strong>the</strong>y also use <strong>the</strong>m as a resell<strong>in</strong>g channel.<br />
17.2.2 Competition from publicly<br />
funded bodies<br />
Current f<strong>in</strong>ancial pressures on publish<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
<strong>the</strong> fall <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and <strong>the</strong> hangover<br />
from <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> technology and telecoms<br />
booms have thrown <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e activities of both<br />
<strong>the</strong> BBC and government/EU <strong>in</strong>to sharp relief,<br />
as <strong>the</strong>y are able to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />
addition, concern cont<strong>in</strong>ues on <strong>the</strong> level of cross<br />
promotion by <strong>the</strong> BBC on its free to air services.<br />
Central and local government and <strong>the</strong> EU are<br />
naturally keen to use <strong>the</strong> new platforms as a<br />
means of reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> citizen with <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
and sett<strong>in</strong>g up cost-effective ways for people to<br />
transact bus<strong>in</strong>ess with government departments<br />
such as fil<strong>in</strong>g tax returns, obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
licences, etc. Some publishers see<br />
governments overstepp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mark <strong>in</strong>to<br />
value-added publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Our <strong>in</strong>terviews revealed a degree of anger<br />
and mistrust at perceived unfair competition<br />
from both <strong>the</strong> government and EU, and also <strong>the</strong><br />
BBC. The sectors affected differed. Government<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g activities were seen as most<br />
threaten<strong>in</strong>g by bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and directory publishers and local newspapers,<br />
who fear <strong>the</strong> impact of central and local<br />
government and NHS electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activities on <strong>the</strong>ir advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sales<br />
revenues. Publishers of specialist health and<br />
municipal publications are particularly worried,<br />
with local newspapers report<strong>in</strong>g concern but<br />
also suggest<strong>in</strong>g that a partnership model with<br />
local public bodies is work<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Educational publishers were most upset by<br />
<strong>the</strong> implications of <strong>the</strong> Government’s approach<br />
to us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> BBC to deliver <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
curriculum. There were a number of strands<br />
to this. First of all, publishers perceive <strong>the</strong><br />
Government as downgrad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance<br />
of books and o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ted material <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
classroom, and of be<strong>in</strong>g unaware of <strong>the</strong> degree<br />
to which <strong>the</strong> efficacy of <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e delivery of<br />
education varies considerably by educational<br />
subject. Secondly, <strong>the</strong>y questioned <strong>the</strong> ‘topdown’<br />
monolithic approach to <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
curriculum, which marg<strong>in</strong>alises <strong>the</strong> role of<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual teachers <strong>in</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g material from<br />
specialist publishers. Thirdly, <strong>the</strong>y were very<br />
angry at what is seen as ‘empire-build<strong>in</strong>g’ by<br />
<strong>the</strong> BBC.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itiatives taken by <strong>the</strong> Government to<br />
create a digital curriculum <strong>in</strong> partnership<br />
between <strong>the</strong> Government, commercial <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
and <strong>the</strong> BBC are well-<strong>in</strong>tentioned. However, <strong>the</strong><br />
proposed implementation highlights many of<br />
<strong>the</strong> problems of publishers operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />
commercial environment at <strong>the</strong> same time as a<br />
public broadcaster whose fund<strong>in</strong>g from public<br />
funds can imp<strong>in</strong>ge on commercial activities. In<br />
our survey, 18% of respondents said that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
have not proceeded with a project because of<br />
<strong>the</strong> activities of <strong>the</strong> BBC.<br />
This stems from a basic distrust among<br />
publishers of <strong>the</strong> BBC activities and its tendency<br />
to use ‘editorial control’ and ‘brand protection’<br />
as major arguments for select<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
suppliers when it is offer<strong>in</strong>g tenders. Despite<br />
<strong>the</strong>re be<strong>in</strong>g very strict rules <strong>in</strong> place govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
anti-competitive activity, <strong>the</strong> actions of <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />
<strong>in</strong> practice, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>the</strong> exclusive<br />
relationship between <strong>the</strong> BBC and BBC<br />
Worldwide, have given rise to tremendous<br />
distrust among publishers as to its motives.<br />
Publishers generally were also concerned<br />
at <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> BBC may now be<br />
stifl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> nascent onl<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment by its massive <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
medium, although <strong>the</strong>re was also<br />
acknowledgement that it had helped to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a wider audience to <strong>the</strong> Internet. As one of our<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviewees said:<br />
114
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
“The BBC has done a fantastic job onl<strong>in</strong>e. It is<br />
high quality content. We just can’t compete with<br />
<strong>the</strong> £90 million <strong>in</strong>vestment it took to create it.”<br />
Publishers have learned to live with, and<br />
<strong>in</strong> many cases, benefit from <strong>the</strong> BBC’s<br />
conventional publish<strong>in</strong>g activities, although <strong>the</strong>y<br />
believe that a much more open relationship<br />
between <strong>the</strong> BBC public service and BBC<br />
Worldwide is needed <strong>in</strong> order to maximise <strong>the</strong><br />
potential partnership opportunities. That modus<br />
vivendi has not been atta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
environment, partly because <strong>the</strong>re is a sense of<br />
not know<strong>in</strong>g where <strong>the</strong> BBC may choose to<br />
expand next, and what <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong><br />
Government and <strong>the</strong> regulators will be. This is<br />
very apparent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of Curriculum Onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
There needs to be a re-establishment of trust,<br />
based on clarity about what <strong>the</strong> ground rules<br />
are and equally importantly, that <strong>the</strong>y will be<br />
enforced <strong>in</strong> spirit as well as letter. In draft<strong>in</strong>g our<br />
recommendations we are very aware of <strong>the</strong><br />
tim<strong>in</strong>g of this report, com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst of <strong>the</strong><br />
creation of a new regulatory framework centred<br />
around Ofcom, and that is why <strong>the</strong> stress is laid<br />
not so much on detailed organisational<br />
suggestions as on <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />
worry<strong>in</strong>g breakdown of trust which any<br />
regulatory set up will have to try to resolve.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts – BBC<br />
26 Recognis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> BBC brand to<br />
<strong>in</strong>spire consumer trust <strong>in</strong> new media, <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />
could harness this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a vibrant<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent multimedia sector by commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />
significant amounts of onl<strong>in</strong>e/broadband content<br />
from <strong>in</strong>dependent producers. This should be<br />
monitored by OFCOM.<br />
27 Independent research should be commissioned to<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> impact of cross-promotion from BBC<br />
broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services to its onl<strong>in</strong>e content and<br />
suggest remedial action if necessary.<br />
28 Electronic learn<strong>in</strong>g credits should be large enough<br />
to prevent BBC from dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market. The<br />
Publishers Association and BESA to encourage<br />
private sector collaboration to provide a coherent<br />
managed learn<strong>in</strong>g offer<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
29 DFES to ensure its bidd<strong>in</strong>g processes for digital<br />
curriculum activities are open and well publicised.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts – exploitation of government<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation and government publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
30 Government should establish as soon as possible<br />
an advisory panel to HMSO, consist<strong>in</strong>g of senior<br />
private and public sector representatives to<br />
monitor policies and practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation trad<strong>in</strong>g environment as recommended<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Information Review.<br />
31 Government to implement <strong>in</strong>teroperable<br />
standards on government content.<br />
32 Non-exclusive licences on <strong>the</strong> use of raw<br />
government <strong>in</strong>formation should be effectively<br />
implemented, stimulat<strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g value-added<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures. Hav<strong>in</strong>g stimulated valueadded<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures, <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
should not undercut <strong>the</strong>se. The panel of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
representatives should monitor this<br />
33 The Government should ensure that <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Information Review are widely<br />
promulgated, and HMSO should propagate best<br />
practice case studies on <strong>the</strong> respective roles of<br />
public and private sectors <strong>in</strong> relation to publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
as technology and <strong>the</strong> marketplace changes<br />
34 Publishers should actively support and<br />
government ensure <strong>the</strong> extension and<br />
improvement of <strong>the</strong> Information Asset Register to<br />
constitute a comprehensive resource discovery<br />
service usable by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
17.2.3 Copyright protection<br />
Copyright protection <strong>in</strong> a digital world is a major<br />
challenge: digital copies are perfect and highspeed<br />
networks and file shar<strong>in</strong>g services such<br />
as Napster have <strong>the</strong> ability to dissem<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
content across <strong>the</strong> world <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stant. The<br />
effects of copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement and file shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on <strong>the</strong> recorded music <strong>in</strong>dustry are well known,<br />
though not all its recent poor performance can<br />
be ascribed to this.<br />
19 Government should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK’s strong<br />
legal framework of publishers’ <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />
rights over all content and encourage UK and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational enforcement schemes for <strong>the</strong> ><br />
115
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
worldwide protection of content (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> selfregulatory<br />
remedial system for digital content)<br />
cover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “take down” and “put back”<br />
schemes.<br />
23 Publishers must be diligent about contractually<br />
secur<strong>in</strong>g rights and also mak<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have<br />
transparent oversight of those that <strong>the</strong>y do own. It<br />
will be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important for publishers to be<br />
able to track <strong>the</strong>ir assets across multiple platforms<br />
and to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>the</strong>y have.<br />
17.2.4 Standards<br />
There are challeng<strong>in</strong>g issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
standards – how open will standards be on new<br />
platforms? How costly will it be to deal with<br />
mistakes about back<strong>in</strong>g particular standards too<br />
soon? Will o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries, such as film,<br />
television and <strong>in</strong>formation technology set<br />
standards which publishers will <strong>the</strong>n have to<br />
follow e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of Digital Rights<br />
Management?<br />
Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees also expressed<br />
frustration with <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re were different<br />
technical standards for <strong>in</strong>teractive content on<br />
<strong>the</strong> three digital television platforms (Digital<br />
Satellite Television, Digital Cable Television and<br />
Digital Terrestrial Television) which added to<br />
author<strong>in</strong>g costs and made it difficult to reuse<br />
Web content, especially on Sky Digital which<br />
has a proprietary standard.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
21 The relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors must create<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry-wide <strong>in</strong>teroperable eXtensible Markup<br />
Language (XML)-based standards for content<br />
creation which can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to ensure new<br />
platforms are supported.<br />
17.2.5 Journal archiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Traditionally, <strong>the</strong> academic librarian has been<br />
responsible for archiv<strong>in</strong>g of pr<strong>in</strong>ted material. In<br />
fact, this is one of <strong>the</strong> prime purposes of <strong>the</strong><br />
librarian. However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> digital age, librarians<br />
are see<strong>in</strong>g this as a function of <strong>the</strong> publisher.<br />
This is fraught with problems as publishers,<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g commercial organisations, are not an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent archive for material that may be of<br />
national importance. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> cost to<br />
publishers of not only archiv<strong>in</strong>g digital content,<br />
but more importantly ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a record of<br />
who has paid for access to <strong>the</strong> content and<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g sure that <strong>the</strong>y get access to it ad<br />
<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itum is enormous.<br />
This also favours <strong>the</strong> large commercial<br />
publishers over some of <strong>the</strong> smaller and not-forprofit<br />
ones. Indeed, one large publisher has<br />
already announced that it will provide an archive<br />
to all of its content. This is a large commercial<br />
company us<strong>in</strong>g its vast resources to raise <strong>the</strong><br />
barrier of entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market and make life<br />
more difficult for its smaller competitors with<br />
much less resources.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
22 If <strong>the</strong> UK is to protect access to research material<br />
and ensure that small and not-for-profit publishers<br />
are not unfairly disadvantaged, <strong>the</strong> archiv<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
digital research should be organised at a national<br />
level by Government. A content repository<br />
toge<strong>the</strong>r with access rights should be created by<br />
Government and <strong>in</strong>dustry for use by national<br />
academic and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />
17.2.6 Gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The slow rate of take up of broadband <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
UK compared with o<strong>the</strong>r parts of Europe and<br />
<strong>the</strong> US is widely ascribed to BT’s exploitation<br />
of its monopoly of <strong>the</strong> local loop <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
<strong>the</strong> speed and price of ADSL deployment<br />
(although it is also true that cable companies<br />
have been quite slow <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g cable<br />
modem services). This must not be allowed<br />
to happen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of o<strong>the</strong>r platforms, such<br />
as wireless networks, <strong>in</strong> future.<br />
Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees also compla<strong>in</strong>ed of <strong>the</strong><br />
high cost of gett<strong>in</strong>g a presence on <strong>the</strong> Sky<br />
Digital <strong>in</strong>teractive platform and of arrogance on<br />
<strong>the</strong> part of BskyB and <strong>the</strong> cable companies.<br />
The Government and <strong>in</strong>dependent regulators<br />
need to ensure that platform operators and<br />
gatekeepers do not exploit monopoly or<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant positions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision and cost of<br />
<strong>the</strong> means of reach<strong>in</strong>g customers <strong>in</strong> a way that<br />
hampers competition or h<strong>in</strong>ders take up.<br />
116
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
17.2.7 Taxation<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s competitive<br />
strengths is <strong>the</strong> historical commitment of <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
government not to tax pr<strong>in</strong>ted knowledge and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation, as <strong>the</strong> common good – <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
education, democracy, <strong>the</strong> general welfare and<br />
<strong>the</strong> economy – is best served <strong>the</strong>reby. This has<br />
been successfully defended with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
European Union, where <strong>the</strong>re are vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regimes <strong>in</strong> force <strong>in</strong> relation to VAT on pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
products. It is vital that this cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be<br />
defended.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> related problem of how, and if,<br />
electronic <strong>in</strong>formation and content should be<br />
taxed is a considerable challenge. This<br />
encompasses not simply <strong>the</strong> rate of taxation,<br />
but how clearly and consistently <strong>the</strong> rules are<br />
applied, (for example to pr<strong>in</strong>t/electronic bundles)<br />
and what account is taken of <strong>the</strong> global nature<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Internet <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> rules on place of<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> and place of purchase of content. Failure<br />
to deal with this issue is affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation –<br />
UK publishers are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to bundle pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />
with electronic ra<strong>the</strong>r than develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative<br />
electronic-only services and fail<strong>in</strong>g to reap <strong>the</strong><br />
cost benefits of mov<strong>in</strong>g fully digital. It could cost<br />
jobs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK as journal publishers, for<br />
example, move to <strong>the</strong> USA or elsewhere outside<br />
<strong>the</strong> EU <strong>in</strong> order to compete with US publishers<br />
on a level taxation play<strong>in</strong>g field. As electronic<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation serves <strong>the</strong> same purpose <strong>in</strong> relation<br />
to <strong>the</strong> common good as <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t, it<br />
seems to us that it should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
same way.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
16 The Government’s policy not to tax knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> common good and <strong>the</strong> EU<br />
derogation on VAT, which constitute a key<br />
competitive strength for <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, must be defended to <strong>the</strong> utmost.<br />
17 Electronic <strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>the</strong> same purpose as<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t and should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
same way. VAT at full rate on electronic<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation discourages economic efficiency and<br />
<strong>in</strong>novation and places UK firms at a competitive<br />
disadvantage to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> USA. Failure to<br />
recognise <strong>the</strong> equivalence of purpose of<br />
electronic and pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong>formation is putt<strong>in</strong>g UK<br />
companies at a severe disadvantage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
ability to compete and <strong>in</strong>novate.<br />
18 The Government should commission a study to<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong> impact of tax<strong>in</strong>g<br />
electronic <strong>in</strong>formation on costs, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />
<strong>the</strong> location of publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />
17.2.8 Regulation of digital content<br />
Many different regulations are emanat<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
<strong>the</strong> UK government and <strong>the</strong> EU which affect<br />
publishers <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative<br />
products and services. These <strong>in</strong>clude rules on<br />
distance sell<strong>in</strong>g and data protection, and on <strong>the</strong><br />
liability for content <strong>in</strong> relation to libel, obscenity<br />
etc. There is a fear that <strong>the</strong> more proactive<br />
philosophy on privacy and o<strong>the</strong>r matters<br />
prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> much of Europe will particularly<br />
disadvantage UK publishers, who are more<br />
directly <strong>in</strong> competition with US ones, who<br />
operate under more relaxed conditions,<br />
because of <strong>the</strong> common language.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
20 Government to commit at both national and EU<br />
level to consistent and light-touch regulation of<br />
new platforms <strong>in</strong> relation to:<br />
• Content and liability (libel, obscenity, etc)<br />
• Privacy and data protection<br />
17.2.9 Caution on new platforms<br />
The effect of <strong>the</strong> experiences of CD-ROM and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet on <strong>the</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness of publishers to<br />
develop content for new platforms <strong>in</strong> advance of<br />
a proven demand for <strong>the</strong>m. This is clearly<br />
illustrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low expectations shown <strong>in</strong> our<br />
questionnaire for opportunities presented by 3G<br />
and digital TV, and to a lesser extent,<br />
broadband (see SWOTs section).<br />
There is a danger that publishers could miss<br />
<strong>the</strong> next wave of technology through an<br />
understandable caution about throw<strong>in</strong>g good<br />
money after bad. The same chart (Figure 17.1)<br />
which demonstrates <strong>the</strong> positive view on<br />
opportunities <strong>in</strong> e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies also<br />
shows a very low level of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> third ><br />
117
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
Figure 17.1<br />
Launch of new products and services<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services<br />
to overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />
Growth of high speed<br />
networks/broadband<br />
Growth of digital television<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />
Improved exploitation of rights<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />
create new products and services<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />
optimise editorial and production processes<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />
optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />
Closer relationship with end customer<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
0 50 100 150 200<br />
Source Pira Questionnaire<br />
generation wireless technologies and digital<br />
television, though somewhat higher <strong>in</strong><br />
broadband <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three-year timeframe and<br />
much greater <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10-year one. While <strong>in</strong> one<br />
sense this is realistic <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> maturity of<br />
<strong>the</strong> technology (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of 3G and possibly<br />
Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e) and <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
consumer penetration (<strong>in</strong> all cases), it could also<br />
lead to publishers leav<strong>in</strong>g development plans<br />
too late. This could compromise platform take<br />
up, as most consumers are not drawn to<br />
technologies as such, but to <strong>the</strong> pleasures and<br />
<strong>the</strong> profit <strong>the</strong>y can derive from us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
There are some well-founded concerns on <strong>the</strong><br />
part of publishers about new platforms’<br />
potential. Several consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
publishers have experimented with television,<br />
and have found that low programme budgets<br />
(now lower than ever <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period of audience<br />
fragmentation) endanger <strong>the</strong>ir offl<strong>in</strong>e brand.<br />
One publisher told us: "Programme budgets<br />
are fall<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> danger is that cheap shoddy<br />
programmes would damage <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
brand. We did a series for a pay TV channel.<br />
They wanted to cont<strong>in</strong>ue – we said no, unless<br />
<strong>the</strong>y could quadruple <strong>the</strong> budget, and that was<br />
when budgets were 10 times higher than now.”<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “We feel that TV and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
are consumed very differently and that<br />
magaz<strong>in</strong>es require very high production values<br />
if translated to TV programmes if <strong>the</strong>y aren’t to<br />
disappo<strong>in</strong>t readers and harm <strong>the</strong> brand. That is<br />
very expensive.”<br />
It is difficult to predict what people will do with<br />
new platforms, but that can be an argument for<br />
experimentation and <strong>in</strong>novation ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
caution, as long as you don’t damage your core<br />
assets. Who seriously foresaw <strong>the</strong> massive<br />
growth of text messag<strong>in</strong>g? Who predicted<br />
success stories on <strong>the</strong> Internet such as eBay or<br />
Friendsreunited.com? Book publishers<br />
committed what may be called <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>stalled<br />
base’ error with CD-ROM – if millions of people<br />
had CD-ROM drives on <strong>the</strong>ir PCs, <strong>the</strong>re must<br />
be a market for CD-ROMs. With broadband,<br />
publishers are wait<strong>in</strong>g for take up to reach<br />
critical mass before seriously develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
content. People did not have to pay (or perceive<br />
<strong>the</strong>y had to pay) for <strong>the</strong> CD-ROM drives on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
PCs – PC makers put <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> order for<br />
software to be loaded. People do have to make<br />
a conscious decision to buy broadband and<br />
good, unique content will be a major driver.<br />
118
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
CHAPTER<br />
18<br />
The conclusions and proposed action plan<br />
18.1 Conclusions<br />
The underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry show that it is fundamentally strong and<br />
vibrant. For example, new title output,<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and exports are all up.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry has also come through a very<br />
turbulent time with <strong>the</strong> explosion of <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
and all <strong>the</strong> threats that that posed.<br />
Pira’s study concludes that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry has<br />
three challenges to meet as it moves towards<br />
operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy:<br />
• The challenge of susta<strong>in</strong>able growth: to<br />
compete on a global scale, UK companies<br />
must have a strong home base from which<br />
<strong>the</strong>y can develop a truly global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry must also adapt to and<br />
become a central feature of a rich, competitive<br />
knowledge economy.<br />
• The challenge of changes <strong>in</strong> customer<br />
behaviour: publishers need to improve <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>ir end-customers and offer<br />
better, more targeted services to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
advertisers.<br />
• The challenge of digital media: <strong>the</strong> competitive<br />
landscape is chang<strong>in</strong>g and many regulatory<br />
and technological challenges lie ahead.<br />
The responses to our questionnaire,<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviews, focus groups and workshop <strong>in</strong>dicate:<br />
• The <strong>in</strong>dustry is aware of <strong>the</strong> need to launch<br />
new products and services and get closer to<br />
<strong>the</strong> end-customer. It also recognises <strong>the</strong><br />
importance of putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> place e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
technologies to improve processes.<br />
• The extension of <strong>in</strong>ternational reach and<br />
scale are seen as important to a greater or<br />
lesser degree <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sectors, depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir focus.<br />
• There is a considerable degree of caution<br />
shown towards <strong>the</strong> opportunities that could be<br />
offered by high-speed networks; those offered<br />
by 3G wireless networks and digital television<br />
are not yet on <strong>the</strong> radar screen.<br />
Spann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> challenges<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g faced and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s exist<strong>in</strong>g progress<br />
to meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> key to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Pira believes <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry must:<br />
• Make <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ks between <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
– <strong>the</strong> desire to create new products and<br />
services while gett<strong>in</strong>g closer to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />
– <strong>the</strong> use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technology to<br />
improve bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices while prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for <strong>the</strong> future<br />
– <strong>the</strong> opportunities new channels, such as<br />
broadband, 3G Wireless and <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />
television, offer to get close to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />
and <strong>in</strong>crease revenues.<br />
• Reap <strong>the</strong> benefits across <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
by apply<strong>in</strong>g more broadly <strong>the</strong> partial<br />
responses to some of <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors.<br />
• Migrate at a manageable pace to serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
knowledge economy, where content drives<br />
services to generate revenues from all<br />
channels at low-cost of re-purpos<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
• Realise that all <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g, should be treated as content<br />
which can potentially earn revenues.<br />
• Resist complacency and too cautious an<br />
approach to <strong>the</strong> opportunities presented by<br />
new platforms.<br />
In conclusion, publish<strong>in</strong>g is an <strong>in</strong>dustry without<br />
boundaries, which has a strong future and can<br />
be fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ned by undertak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
actions described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section. But,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is no po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g an action plan that is<br />
not implemented effectively, so we need a<br />
mechanism for do<strong>in</strong>g so.<br />
Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
35 The <strong>DTI</strong> and UKPM to create a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
implementation team to ensure effective<br />
follow up to this Action Plan.<br />
18.2 Proposed action plan<br />
Each action po<strong>in</strong>t can become <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />
of one of four group<strong>in</strong>gs: <strong>the</strong> Government; <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry; <strong>the</strong> trade associations; or a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
responsibility. Figure 18.1 gives an <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />
120
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Figure 18.1 Division of responsibility for<br />
each action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Government <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
High<br />
Government<br />
action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
where Pira considers responsibility should lie<br />
for each of <strong>the</strong> action po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
The action po<strong>in</strong>ts have also been ranked<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> importance that Pira attaches<br />
to <strong>the</strong>m to achieve <strong>the</strong> state of preparedness of<br />
<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry to exploit <strong>the</strong> scenario<br />
described careful transition to knowledge<br />
economy. These rank<strong>in</strong>gs are essential,<br />
necessary and desirable. Their order with<strong>in</strong><br />
each category is simply a reflection of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
order with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
Industry<br />
action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Trade association <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
High government<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
1 7 14 18 19 20<br />
24 26 27 29 30 31<br />
32 33 34<br />
2 5 12 16 17 22<br />
28 35<br />
8 9 11 13 21 23 3 4 6 10 15 25<br />
Industry <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
Trade association<br />
action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
High<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>t actions<br />
High trade<br />
association <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
18.2.1 Essential actions<br />
Competition law<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 1 (Section 15.3.3)<br />
If <strong>the</strong> Government wants to encourage globally<br />
powerful UK-based publish<strong>in</strong>g and media<br />
companies it must consider relax<strong>in</strong>g competition<br />
law <strong>in</strong> how it treats <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g sector and<br />
re-exam<strong>in</strong>e its def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g sector market.<br />
A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g Sector Skills<br />
Council (SSC)<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 2 (Section 15.4)<br />
As <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry moves ever closer to<br />
produc<strong>in</strong>g new products and services that use<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g degrees of <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />
value-added services, <strong>the</strong> need for specialists <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and technology will<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease. This will require <strong>the</strong> ability to attract<br />
people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and cont<strong>in</strong>ually tra<strong>in</strong><br />
and re-tra<strong>in</strong> staff. A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g skillsbased<br />
SSC must be established urgently to<br />
ensure that <strong>the</strong> skills reflect those required <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> knowledge economy.<br />
Statistics<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 5 (Section 15.6)<br />
In order to capture <strong>the</strong> essential dynamics of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> statistics:<br />
– <strong>DTI</strong>, ONS and UKPM to collaborate with<br />
each o<strong>the</strong>r and representatives of <strong>the</strong> EU<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> representations to EU<br />
on NACE revisions (Eurostat 2006). This is<br />
an urgent requirement as <strong>the</strong>re is an<br />
autumn deadl<strong>in</strong>e for submissions and <strong>the</strong><br />
121
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itions could be <strong>in</strong> force for<br />
more than a decade.<br />
– Study to be conducted based on <strong>the</strong> gap<br />
analysis from this report to arrive at detailed<br />
recommendations on <strong>the</strong> data that needs to<br />
be collected.<br />
– Government and UKPM to collaborate <strong>in</strong> an<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative to communicate to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>the</strong><br />
importance of supply<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />
Customer relationships<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 8 (Section 16.3)<br />
Publishers need to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> Digital Rights<br />
Management, Content Management Systems<br />
and Customer Relationship Management<br />
technology better to understand and service<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir end-users behaviour. This will assist <strong>in</strong><br />
both sell<strong>in</strong>g products and services, as well as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g better able to target customers for<br />
advertisers and direct market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 12 (Section 16.3)<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> trade associations, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
and supply cha<strong>in</strong> partners need to accelerate<br />
adoption of e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives and<br />
standards to facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation exchange<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The BBC<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 26 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Recognis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> BBC brand to<br />
<strong>in</strong>spire consumer trust <strong>in</strong> new media, <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />
should harness this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a vibrant<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent multimedia sector by<br />
commission<strong>in</strong>g significant amounts of<br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e/broadband content from <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
producers. This should be monitored by<br />
OFCOM.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 27 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Independent research should be commissioned<br />
to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> impact of cross-promotion from<br />
BBC broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services to its onl<strong>in</strong>e content<br />
and suggest remedial action if necessary.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 28 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Electronic learn<strong>in</strong>g credits should be large<br />
enough to prevent BBC from dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
market. PA and BESA to encourage private<br />
sector collaboration to provide a coherent<br />
managed learn<strong>in</strong>g offer<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 29 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
DFES to ensure its bidd<strong>in</strong>g processes for<br />
digital curriculum activities are open and<br />
well publicised.<br />
Public sector <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 30 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Government should establish as soon<br />
as possible an advisory panel to HMSO,<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of senior private and public sector<br />
representatives to monitor policies and practices<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector <strong>in</strong>formation trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment as recommended <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cross<br />
Cutt<strong>in</strong>g Review of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 32 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Non-exclusive licences on <strong>the</strong> use of raw<br />
government <strong>in</strong>formation should be rolled-out,<br />
stimulat<strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g value-added publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ventures. Hav<strong>in</strong>g stimulated value-added<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures, <strong>the</strong> Government should not<br />
undercut <strong>the</strong>se. The panel of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
representatives should monitor this.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 33 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
HMSO should propagate best practice case<br />
studies on <strong>the</strong> respective roles of public and<br />
private sectors <strong>in</strong> relation to publish<strong>in</strong>g as<br />
technology and <strong>the</strong> marketplace changes.<br />
Open standards and assets<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 7 (Section 15.7)<br />
Recognis<strong>in</strong>g that it is not <strong>the</strong> role of<br />
government to mandate standards, it should<br />
use its <strong>in</strong>fluence as far as possible to support<br />
open standards for content provision on all<br />
exist<strong>in</strong>g and new platforms.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 21 (Section 17.2.4)<br />
The relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors must create<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry-wide <strong>in</strong>teroperable eXtensible Markup<br />
Language (XML)-based standards for content<br />
creation which can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to ensure<br />
new platforms are supported.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 23 (Section 17.2.3)<br />
Publishers must be diligent about contractually<br />
secur<strong>in</strong>g rights and also mak<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />
122
Issues for competitiveness<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
have transparent oversight of those that <strong>the</strong>y do<br />
own. It will be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important for<br />
publishers to be<br />
able to track <strong>the</strong>ir assets across multiple<br />
platforms and to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong> rights<br />
<strong>the</strong>y have.<br />
Taxation<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 16 (Section 17.2.7)<br />
The Government’s policy not to tax knowledge<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> common good and <strong>the</strong> EU<br />
derogation on VAT, which constitute a key<br />
competitive strength for <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, must be defended to <strong>the</strong> utmost.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 17 (Section 17.2.7)<br />
Electronic <strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>the</strong> same purpose as<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t and should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
same way. VAT at full rate on electronic<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation discourages economic efficiency<br />
and <strong>in</strong>novation and places UK firms at a<br />
competitive disadvantage to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US.<br />
Failure to recognise <strong>the</strong> equivalence of purpose<br />
of electronic and pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong>formation is putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
UK companies at a severe disadvantage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
ability to compete and <strong>in</strong>novate.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 18 (Section 17.2.7)<br />
The Government should commission a study to<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong> impact of tax<strong>in</strong>g<br />
electronic <strong>in</strong>formation on costs, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />
<strong>the</strong> location of publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />
Piracy<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 24 (Section 15.3.5)<br />
Government must keep up high level pressure<br />
on foreign governments to prevent piracy and to<br />
take action aga<strong>in</strong>st copyright violators.<br />
Competitiveness Analysis Project<br />
implementation<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 35 (Section 18.1)<br />
The <strong>DTI</strong> and UKPM to create a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
implementation team to ensure effective<br />
follow up to this Action Plan.<br />
18.2.2 Necessary actions<br />
Career development<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 3 (Section 15.4)<br />
Proper career development paths us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry-standard qualifications (driven by SSC)<br />
must be put <strong>in</strong>to place. This will encourage<br />
young graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry who will be<br />
more easily able to compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry with o<strong>the</strong>r potential careers.<br />
Technology awareness<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 6 (Section 15.7)<br />
Sector-specific/common technology awareness<br />
forums and o<strong>the</strong>r methods to communicate best<br />
practice to be devised on key technology<br />
opportunities aimed at both strategic and<br />
technical levels and audiences.<br />
Data analysis<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 9 (Section 16.1)<br />
Industry must implement strategies throughout<br />
companies and trade associations to collect<br />
data about how <strong>in</strong>formation is used and its<br />
context, as well as <strong>the</strong> current sales and<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />
Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 11 (Section 16.3)<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r routes to <strong>the</strong> customer must be<br />
developed and/or streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
protect diversity and <strong>in</strong>novation and to support<br />
frequency of purchase. For example:<br />
– Professional alternative home delivery<br />
services should be created<br />
– Subscriptions should be extended<br />
– Targeted direct mail should be exploited<br />
and supported by Internet-based CRM<br />
techniques.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 13 (Section 16.4)<br />
Industry and distribution trade associations<br />
to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support <strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs<br />
with promotional campaigns, clubs and<br />
supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novations.<br />
123
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Issues for competitiveness<br />
Public sector <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 31 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Government to implement <strong>in</strong>teroperable<br />
standards on government content.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 34 (Section 17.2.2)<br />
Publishers should actively support and<br />
government ensure <strong>the</strong> extension and<br />
improvement of <strong>the</strong> Information Asset Register<br />
to constitute a comprehensive resource<br />
discovery service usable by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
Regulation and copyright protection<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 19 (Section 17.2.3)<br />
Government should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK’s strong<br />
legal protection of publishers’ <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />
property rights over all content and encourage<br />
UK and <strong>in</strong>ternational enforcement schemes for<br />
<strong>the</strong> worldwide protection of content (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> self-regulatory remedial system for digital<br />
content) cover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “take down” and “put<br />
back” schemes.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 20 (Section 17.2.8)<br />
Government to commit at both national and EU<br />
level to consistent and light regulation of new<br />
platforms <strong>in</strong> relation to:<br />
– Content and liability (libel, obscenity, etc.)<br />
– Privacy and data protection.<br />
18.2.3 Desirable actions<br />
Profile<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 4 (Section 15.4)<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry should undertake market research<br />
to understand how it is perceived by end<br />
customers, government and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
This should focus on determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong><br />
current perception of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is by <strong>the</strong>se<br />
groups and which particular expertise of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry can be targeted to which<br />
groups and develop<strong>in</strong>g a plan for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
awareness among <strong>the</strong>se groups.<br />
Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 10 (Section 16.3)<br />
Relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors to lobby for carefully<br />
managed <strong>in</strong>troduction of competition <strong>in</strong> mail<br />
services to meet cost/efficiency goals without<br />
threaten<strong>in</strong>g universal delivery.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 14 (Section 16.4)<br />
Supermarkets must <strong>in</strong>clude magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
newspapers and books <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supermarket<br />
code. This code also needs to be made<br />
more robust.<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 15 (Section 16.4)<br />
Build on exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> report ‘Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />
Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize’ – use this opportunity to<br />
<strong>in</strong>ject fresh momentum.<br />
Digital archive<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 22 (Section 17.2.5)<br />
In order for <strong>the</strong> UK to protect access to<br />
important research material and to ensure that<br />
small and not-for-profit publishers are not<br />
unfairly disadvantaged, <strong>the</strong> archiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of digital research should be organised at a<br />
national level by government. A content<br />
repository toge<strong>the</strong>r with access rights should be<br />
created by government and <strong>in</strong>dustry for use by<br />
national academic and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />
Copyright licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 25 (Section 16.1)<br />
In order to provide a simple way for customers<br />
to use content legally, UKPM should explore<br />
<strong>the</strong> possible creation of a s<strong>in</strong>gle body to issue<br />
blanket licences.<br />
124
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
PART1<br />
Appendices<br />
125
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Appendix A<br />
Methodology<br />
The project has been divided <strong>in</strong>to stages:<br />
Stage one<br />
1 Background desk research, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exam<strong>in</strong>ation of a number of previous studies<br />
and reports that have been carried out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
broad subject area of publish<strong>in</strong>g. These<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude material from trade associations,<br />
private sector research bodies, universities<br />
and government and government-funded<br />
sources as well as company reports and<br />
accounts. A list of <strong>the</strong> major reports consulted<br />
is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendix D. This does not<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude numerous news articles consulted, <strong>in</strong><br />
pr<strong>in</strong>t and on <strong>the</strong> Internet.<br />
2 Selection of <strong>the</strong> quantitative <strong>in</strong>dicators by<br />
which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s relative performance may<br />
be judged. This was followed by <strong>the</strong><br />
collection and analysis of <strong>the</strong> data<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> chosen <strong>in</strong>dicators and<br />
gaps identified. The process and its results<br />
are exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 1.<br />
Stage two<br />
1 A series of <strong>in</strong>terviews was carried out with<br />
representatives of trade associations and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r bodies, and ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion formers’ with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry, ma<strong>in</strong>ly senior company executives.<br />
These <strong>in</strong>terviews aimed to ensure that <strong>the</strong><br />
broad range of issues of major concern to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry were identified as early as possible <strong>in</strong><br />
order to <strong>in</strong>form what was to follow. In all, 50<br />
face to face <strong>in</strong>terviews were completed.<br />
2 A questionnaire was devised and sent out to<br />
450 selected recipients. 69 questionnaires<br />
were returned, with <strong>the</strong> responses be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
representative of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended profile.<br />
3 The sample was chosen through profil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
relative size of <strong>the</strong> different sub sectors with<strong>in</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g and obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g names of proposed<br />
recipients from <strong>the</strong> relevant trade<br />
associations. We were unable to select a<br />
sample that we could be confident would yield<br />
quantitative results which could be grossed up<br />
to give a statistically valid overall picture of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry. This is for several reasons, <strong>the</strong> most<br />
important of which is that <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong><br />
universe of companies is not known. The<br />
questionnaire was ma<strong>in</strong>ly qualitative,<br />
attempt<strong>in</strong>g to reveal <strong>the</strong> major competitive<br />
issues and concerns of companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry. Quantitative data was requested<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>cipally <strong>in</strong> order to cross-tabulate o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
results. The text is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendix C.<br />
The results of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire are referred<br />
to <strong>in</strong> various places throughout <strong>the</strong> report as<br />
<strong>the</strong> relevant issues are discussed.<br />
4 A SWOT analysis was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
results of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews and questionnaires,<br />
and this was tested with focus groups<br />
consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>dustry and trade association<br />
representatives.<br />
5 Three scenarios were devised and tested with<br />
<strong>the</strong> same focus groups.<br />
Stage three<br />
1 A draft Action Plan was drawn up and debated<br />
at a workshop of <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>DTI</strong><br />
representatives.<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>al report was drafted.<br />
A list of <strong>the</strong> participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />
(<strong>in</strong>terviewees, questionnaire respondents, focus<br />
groups and workshop attendees) is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
Appendix B.<br />
Note on forecast methodology<br />
The forecasts <strong>in</strong> this report are based on a four<br />
step procedure.<br />
1 Quantitative forecasts are only produced<br />
where <strong>the</strong>re is sufficient historical data to<br />
produce mean<strong>in</strong>gful results which can be<br />
tested for <strong>the</strong>ir accuracy and reliability.<br />
2 We use error-correction models, to construct<br />
forecasts which are built from two<br />
components: long-run trends and short-run<br />
deviations from <strong>the</strong> trend. The components<br />
are constructed us<strong>in</strong>g historical data on<br />
important economic and social variables such<br />
as GDP and household expenditure.<br />
126
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
3 In our central predictions, we assume that <strong>the</strong><br />
growth of <strong>the</strong> UK economy, prices and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
important variables matches <strong>the</strong> forecasts<br />
produced by <strong>the</strong> UK Treasury.<br />
4. In all <strong>the</strong> charts with forecasts, we have built<br />
and estimated <strong>the</strong> models underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />
forecasts. Where possible we compare our<br />
forecasts to those produced by experts and<br />
use <strong>the</strong>ir ‘high’ and ‘low’ figures to provide<br />
brackets for our own estimates. In <strong>the</strong><br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cases, we have produced our own<br />
‘high’ and ‘low’ forecasts.<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>itional Note<br />
Throughout <strong>the</strong> report <strong>the</strong> terms ‘publisher’ and<br />
‘publish<strong>in</strong>g’ occur many times. In <strong>the</strong> sections <strong>in</strong><br />
Part 1 which analyse statistical <strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>the</strong>se<br />
terms are def<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> sources<br />
used and comments are made with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
sections on <strong>the</strong> specific def<strong>in</strong>itions.<br />
Elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report, we <strong>in</strong>tend <strong>the</strong> terms<br />
to be understood as those bus<strong>in</strong>esses whose<br />
primary activity is <strong>the</strong> acquisition, selection,<br />
arrangement and manipulation of content for<br />
sale and for <strong>the</strong> purposes of secur<strong>in</strong>g audiences<br />
for advertisers. This content may or may not be<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> a pr<strong>in</strong>ted form and can <strong>in</strong>clude<br />
all k<strong>in</strong>ds of electronic and audio-visual formats,<br />
and even events and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, though <strong>the</strong> study<br />
specifically excludes companies whose primary<br />
activity is <strong>in</strong> broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. It also excludes<br />
music publishers. We are well aware that all<br />
k<strong>in</strong>ds of companies are now engaged <strong>in</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t or on <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />
for example retailers, airl<strong>in</strong>es, banks,<br />
recruitment agencies and estate agents. There<br />
are also Web-based <strong>in</strong>termediaries such as<br />
Lastm<strong>in</strong>ute.com or FriendsReunited, which also<br />
engage <strong>in</strong> content acquisition and manipulation,<br />
and perhaps could be described as Internet<br />
publishers, but we do not def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>m as such.<br />
Their activities have important implications for<br />
<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, which are explored <strong>in</strong><br />
this report, but <strong>in</strong> our view, <strong>the</strong>y do not form part<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry sector under scrut<strong>in</strong>y here.<br />
><br />
127
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Appendix B<br />
Participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />
Interviewees<br />
Archant (formerly Eastern Counties<br />
Newspapers Group)<br />
Associated Newspapers<br />
Attic Futura (UK)<br />
Batch<br />
Book Data<br />
BBC<br />
BBC Worldwide Ltd<br />
BioMedCentral Ltd<br />
Blacket Turner & Company Ltd<br />
Book Industry Communication<br />
CAB International<br />
Cambridge University Press<br />
CMP<br />
COMAG<br />
Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Economist Group<br />
EMAP Communications<br />
Factiva<br />
Fish4<br />
Gale Group<br />
The Guardian<br />
Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />
Hello! Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Hemm<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />
Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Incisive Media<br />
Ingenta plc<br />
Institute of Physics<br />
Johnston Press plc<br />
Little, Brown & Co (UK)<br />
Macmillan<br />
MarketForce (UK)<br />
Midland News Association<br />
Moonlight <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
The National Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Company<br />
Nelson Thornes<br />
Newsquest Media Group<br />
Northcliffe Newspapers<br />
Pearson plc<br />
Pengu<strong>in</strong> Group UK<br />
Scholastic<br />
The Random House Group<br />
Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information<br />
Regional Independent Media<br />
Reuters<br />
The Scottish Newspaper Society<br />
The Stationery Office<br />
Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror<br />
J Whitaker<br />
William Reed <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
Attended <strong>the</strong> focus groups and/or workshop<br />
Advanstar Communications Ltd<br />
Archant<br />
Association of Learned and Professional<br />
Society Publishers (ALPSP)<br />
Association of Newspaper and Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Wholesalers (ANMW)<br />
Attic Futura (UK)<br />
Booksellers Association<br />
British Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Industries Federation (BPIF)<br />
Cube3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Directory and Database Publishers Association<br />
(DPA)<br />
Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Department of Trade and Industry<br />
Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Services Ltd (EPS)<br />
FT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
Guardian Unlimited<br />
Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />
Hello! Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Hemm<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />
Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd<br />
John Murray Ltd<br />
Kilborn Associates<br />
National Federation of Retail Newsagents<br />
(NFRN)<br />
Nelson Thornes<br />
Newbury News<br />
News International<br />
Newspaper Publishers Association<br />
Newsquest Media Group<br />
Newtrade <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Northcliffe Newspapers<br />
Oxford Brookes University<br />
Pearson Education<br />
Periodical Publishers Association<br />
Public Sector <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
Publishers Association<br />
128
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />
QCA<br />
The Random House Group<br />
The Stationery Office (TSO)<br />
Thomson<br />
Tudor Rose<br />
William Reed <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
Questionnaire respondents<br />
Advanstar Communications Ltd<br />
Agenda <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Alpha Science International Ltd<br />
AP Information Services<br />
The Barnsley Chronicle Ltd<br />
Berg Publishers<br />
The British Library<br />
The British Museum Company<br />
CABI <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Communications Team<br />
Constable & Rob<strong>in</strong>son Ltd<br />
Cube3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Dak<strong>in</strong>i Books Ltd<br />
David Fulton Publishers<br />
Dunferml<strong>in</strong>e Press Group<br />
EMAP Consumer Media<br />
Ford & Mason Ltd<br />
FT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
G J Palmer & Sons<br />
Guiton Group Ltd<br />
Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />
Haymarket <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
Henry Stewart Publications<br />
Hirst, Kidd & Rennie Ltd<br />
<strong>Home</strong>builder Publications Ltd<br />
Hopscotch Educational <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
Icom Publications Ltd<br />
Institution of Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />
Institute of Physics <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Inter Varsity Press<br />
Islamic Texts Society<br />
IWA <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd<br />
Jessica K<strong>in</strong>gsley Publishers<br />
Johnston Press plc<br />
Kent Messenger Ltd<br />
Kogan <strong>Page</strong>/Earthscan<br />
MCB Up Ltd<br />
MMT Ltd<br />
Nature <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Group<br />
Network Education Press Ltd<br />
New Media<br />
Newsquest Media Group<br />
Newhall Publications Ltd<br />
Newtrade <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
Northcliffe Newspapers Group Ltd<br />
Open University Press<br />
The Orion <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Group Ltd<br />
Pearson plc<br />
Picker<strong>in</strong>g & Chatto Publishers<br />
ProQuest Information & Learn<strong>in</strong>g Ltd (formerly<br />
Chadwyck-Healey)<br />
Pryor Publications<br />
Public Sector <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
The Redan Company<br />
Reed Educational and Professional <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
The Royal Society<br />
The Royal Society of Chemistry<br />
SCM-Canterbury Press<br />
Simon & Schuster (UK) Ltd<br />
Society for Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology<br />
Thoemmes Press<br />
Thomas Telford Ltd<br />
Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror plc<br />
Tudor Rose<br />
Unity Media plc<br />
Usborne <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />
VNU Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment Media UK Ltd<br />
W<strong>in</strong>dhorse Publications<br />
><br />
129
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Appendix C<br />
Text of questionnaire<br />
Company name__________________________________________________________________<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
Company address _______________________________________________________________<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
Contact name ___________________________________________________________________<br />
Position ________________________________________________________________________<br />
Department _____________________________________________________________________<br />
Telephone ________________________________ Fax_________________________________<br />
Email address ___________________________________________________________________<br />
Please state whe<strong>the</strong>r you are respond<strong>in</strong>g for your whole company or on behalf of your division:<br />
■ Company<br />
■ Division<br />
Section 1 About your company/division<br />
A Which products and services does<br />
your company/division produce? (Tick<br />
all that apply)<br />
■ Regional daily<br />
■ Regional Sunday<br />
■ Local weekly<br />
Books<br />
■ Consumer adult<br />
■ Consumer children’s<br />
■ Academic/professional<br />
■ STM<br />
■ Schools<br />
■ ELT<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify __________________<br />
Journals<br />
■ Academic<br />
■ Professional<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify __________________<br />
Newspapers<br />
Paid-for<br />
■ National daily<br />
■ National Sunday<br />
Free<br />
■ Daily<br />
■ Sunday<br />
■ Weekly<br />
Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
■ Consumer<br />
■ Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
■ Contract<br />
■ Special <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify _______________________<br />
Newsletters<br />
■ Advertis<strong>in</strong>g supported<br />
■ Subscription only<br />
Directories<br />
■ Advertis<strong>in</strong>g supported<br />
■ Subscription only<br />
130
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
■ Databases (o<strong>the</strong>r than onl<strong>in</strong>e versions of<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ted products)<br />
■ Conferences or exhibitions<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
■ Audio books<br />
■ Contract pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Leaflets/<strong>in</strong>serts/direct mail<br />
■ Mas<strong>the</strong>ad programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation not covered elsewhere,<br />
eg brokerage, customised <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
services, f<strong>in</strong>ancial data services<br />
■ Information solutions eg software, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
management consultancy<br />
■ Web-based services o<strong>the</strong>r than versions of<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ted product, eg <strong>in</strong>fomediary, portal, vortal<br />
■ List rental<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ___________________<br />
B What is <strong>the</strong> approximate turnover of<br />
your company/division derived from <strong>the</strong><br />
products/services <strong>in</strong> Section 1A<br />
■ Under £1m<br />
■ Between £1m and £5m<br />
■ Between £5m and £25m<br />
■ Between £25m and £50m<br />
■ Between £50m and £100m<br />
■ Between £100m and 500m<br />
■ More than £500m<br />
C Approximately how many full-time<br />
employees does your company/<br />
division have?<br />
______________________________________<br />
D What is <strong>the</strong> approximate source of<br />
your revenues of <strong>the</strong> products and<br />
services <strong>in</strong> Section 1A? (tick one)<br />
■ 100% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g; 0% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />
■ 75% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 25% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />
■ 50% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 50% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />
■ 25% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 75% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />
■ 0% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 100% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />
What percentage, if any, of your<br />
advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue is from<br />
leaflets/<strong>in</strong>serts/direct mail?_____________%<br />
What percentage, if any, of your total<br />
revenue is from contract pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g?_______%<br />
What percentage, if any, of your total<br />
revenue is derived from <strong>the</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g/<br />
sale of rights? _______________________%<br />
E Approximately what proportion of your<br />
company’s/division’s earn<strong>in</strong>gs come<br />
from overseas?<br />
■ Less than 5%<br />
■ 5%-25%<br />
■ 25%-50%<br />
■ More than 50%<br />
F Platforms/delivery media – what is <strong>the</strong><br />
approximate percentage breakdown of<br />
revenues from <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>t _______ %<br />
Onl<strong>in</strong>e ______ %<br />
CD-ROM ____ %<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r _______ % (please specify ____________)<br />
G Approximately what percentage of<br />
your turnover is devoted to capital<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment?<br />
_____________%<br />
H Approximately what percentage of<br />
your turnover is devoted to new product<br />
development?<br />
_____________%<br />
><br />
131
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 2 About your markets and <strong>the</strong><br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment<br />
A Are <strong>the</strong> end users of your products<br />
and services: (tick one)<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly consumers<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>stitutions (eg schools, universities)<br />
B Orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>ternational revenues:<br />
(tick one)<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly EU (exclud<strong>in</strong>g UK)<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly North America<br />
■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly from o<strong>the</strong>r areas, please specify ________.<br />
C Over <strong>the</strong> last five years, has<br />
competition with<strong>in</strong> your market area:<br />
■ Increased<br />
■ Decreased<br />
■ Rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable<br />
D If competition has <strong>in</strong>creased, what has<br />
been <strong>the</strong> major source?<br />
■ New entrants to market from with<strong>in</strong> UK<br />
■ Established UK-based companies<br />
■ Competition from players with<strong>in</strong> your value cha<strong>in</strong><br />
New entrants to market from:<br />
■ EU<br />
■ US<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________<br />
Established foreign-based companies, <strong>in</strong><br />
■ EU<br />
■ US<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________<br />
E Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = does not constra<strong>in</strong>, 5 = constra<strong>in</strong>s severely), <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
to what extent each item constra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> expansion of your bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Slow growth of market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Low profitability of sector ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Regulation affect<strong>in</strong>g your bus<strong>in</strong>ess, please specify ____________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Inadequate enforcement of copyright/piracy ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Lack of access to capital ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Barriers to access to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Distribution difficulties ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Lack of access to retail channels or space ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Difficulty <strong>in</strong> staff recruitment or retention ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Skills shortages ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ris<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs, please specify ______________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Cost of content acquisition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Overseas competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Availability of experienced middle/senior managers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
132
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
F Supply cha<strong>in</strong> problems: us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not problematic,<br />
5 = severely problematic) <strong>in</strong>dicate to what extent <strong>the</strong> items below cause<br />
problems <strong>in</strong> your supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Concentration of ownership of paper supply ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Inflexibility or cost of pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Lack of systems <strong>in</strong>teroperability with suppliers or customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Creation of electronic content ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Wastage/returns ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Distribution of electronic content ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Inflexibility or cost of distribution ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Postal service efficiency and cost ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
G Impact of social change and globalisation: do you see <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g changes as<br />
positive/negative/neutral for your bus<strong>in</strong>ess?<br />
Factor Positive Negative Neutral<br />
The com<strong>in</strong>g of a generation accustomed to <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>in</strong>teractive technologies ■ ■ ■<br />
Age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> population ■ ■ ■<br />
Spread of English language proficiency <strong>in</strong>ternationally ■ ■ ■<br />
Increased demands on consumers’ time, money and attention ■ ■ ■<br />
The <strong>in</strong>ternationalisation of <strong>the</strong> labour market ■ ■ ■<br />
Higher educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment of <strong>the</strong> population ■ ■ ■<br />
European Union enlargement and <strong>in</strong>tegration ■ ■ ■<br />
Accelerat<strong>in</strong>g world trade and <strong>in</strong>vestment liberalisation ■ ■ ■<br />
Capacity to deliver content worldwide over high speed networks ■ ■ ■<br />
The creation of <strong>the</strong> Eurozone ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■<br />
H Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least likely, 5 = most likely), <strong>in</strong>dicate which activities<br />
you <strong>in</strong>tend to take to improve your competitiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g three years,<br />
a) assum<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued steady economic growth; and, b) assum<strong>in</strong>g a general<br />
economic recession.<br />
a) Assum<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued steady economic growth<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Cut production costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Cut distribution costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquire o<strong>the</strong>r companies or titles ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Expand <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Expand <strong>in</strong>to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ga<strong>in</strong> closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Enhance brand recognition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
133
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
More effective management of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights/assets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquisition and exploitation of new rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Investment <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Enhance e-commerce/e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Increase capital <strong>in</strong>vestment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
b) Assum<strong>in</strong>g a general economic recession<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Cut production costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Cut distribution costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquire o<strong>the</strong>r companies or titles ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Expand <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Expand <strong>in</strong>to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ga<strong>in</strong> closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Enhance brand recognition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
More effective management of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights/assets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquisition and exploitation of new rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Investment <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Enhance e-commerce/e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Increase capital <strong>in</strong>vestment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
134
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 3 Use of e-commerce and ICT<br />
A Which of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g facilities does your company have or plan to have?<br />
Currently Have plans Have no<br />
have to deploy plans to<br />
<strong>in</strong> near deploy<br />
future<br />
A website for <strong>in</strong>formation purposes only ■ ■ ■<br />
A website for content delivery ■ ■ ■<br />
The facility to allow <strong>the</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g of orders onl<strong>in</strong>e to suppliers ■ ■ ■<br />
The facility to allow <strong>the</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g of customer orders onl<strong>in</strong>e ■ ■ ■<br />
The facility to allow electronic payment by customers ■ ■ ■<br />
The facility to pay suppliers electronically ■ ■ ■<br />
B Which of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g IT systems does your company have or plan to have?<br />
Currently Have plans Have no<br />
have to deploy plans to<br />
<strong>in</strong> near deploy<br />
future<br />
An <strong>in</strong>tranet ■ ■ ■<br />
The ability to accept advertisement placement electronically ■ ■ ■<br />
A content management system ■ ■ ■<br />
A rights management system ■ ■ ■<br />
A customer relationship management system ■ ■ ■<br />
XML for data <strong>in</strong>terchange ■ ■ ■<br />
XML for media-<strong>in</strong>dependent storage ■ ■ ■<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>t-on-demand ■ ■ ■<br />
Fully digital workflow ■ ■ ■<br />
><br />
135
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 4 Expectations of <strong>the</strong> future<br />
A Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = greatest) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> potential of each<br />
of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for your bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> a) <strong>the</strong> next three years<br />
b) <strong>the</strong> next 10 years?<br />
3 years<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to overseas<br />
markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of digital television ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Improved exploitation of rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise editorial and production processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-commerce technologies to optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
10 years<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to overseas<br />
markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of high speed networks/broadband ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of digital television ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Growth of 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Improved exploitation of rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise editorial and production processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Use of e-commerce technologies to optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />
market<strong>in</strong>g processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
136
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
B Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = greatest) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> potential threats to<br />
your company’s success a) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next three years? B) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next ten years?<br />
3 years<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Economic recession ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Technological change eg development of broadband and 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
New entrants to your market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Stricter regulation, please specify __________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Taxation changes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
10 years<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Economic recession ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Technological change eg development of broadband and 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
New entrants to your market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />
(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Stricter regulation, please specify __________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Taxation changes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
137
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 5 Role of <strong>the</strong> Government/public sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g market<br />
A Do you regard <strong>the</strong> government <strong>in</strong><br />
its role as <strong>in</strong>formation supplier and<br />
publisher as<br />
■ A competitor<br />
■ A partner<br />
■ Both<br />
■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
B Are <strong>the</strong>re any publish<strong>in</strong>g projects you<br />
have pursued as a result of co-operation<br />
with a government department or public<br />
sector body?<br />
■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />
■ No<br />
C Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have not<br />
pursued or curtailed as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g activities of a government<br />
department or public sector body?<br />
■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />
■ No<br />
D Have you experienced problems <strong>in</strong><br />
access<strong>in</strong>g Government material for<br />
commercial reuse s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> policy on<br />
<strong>the</strong> reuse of government <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
was liberalised <strong>in</strong> 1999?<br />
■ Yes<br />
■ No<br />
E Have you taken out an HMSO Click-<br />
Use Licence which enables <strong>the</strong> re-use of<br />
a wide range of government <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
free of charge?<br />
■ Yes<br />
■ No<br />
■ Be<strong>in</strong>g considered<br />
■ Not aware<br />
138
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 6 Role of <strong>the</strong> BBC <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g market<br />
A Do you regard <strong>the</strong> BBC as:<br />
■ A competitor<br />
■ A partner<br />
■ Both<br />
■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
B Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have<br />
pursued as a result of co-operation with<br />
<strong>the</strong> BBC?<br />
■ Yes, please specify: _______________________<br />
■ No<br />
C Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have not<br />
pursued or curtailed as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
activities of <strong>the</strong> BBC?<br />
■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />
■ No<br />
D Do you regard any of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
BBC activities as an opportunity for<br />
partnership or product development for<br />
your company? Tick all that apply<br />
■ Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Onl<strong>in</strong>e services<br />
■ Interactive television<br />
■ Licens<strong>in</strong>g or merchandis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Ability to use television or radio as crosspromotion<br />
vehicle<br />
■ None<br />
E Do you regard any of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
BBC activities as giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to problems<br />
for your company? Tick all that apply<br />
■ Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Onl<strong>in</strong>e services<br />
■ Interactive television<br />
■ Licens<strong>in</strong>g or merchandis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
■ Ability to use television or radio as crosspromotion<br />
vehicle<br />
■ None<br />
><br />
139
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 7 Role of <strong>in</strong>dustry and Government <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
competitiveness<br />
A Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale 1 to 5 (1 = least important, 5 = most important) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> positive<br />
steps <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry could jo<strong>in</strong>tly take to improve its competitiveness.<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Jo<strong>in</strong>t export<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Incentives to improve <strong>the</strong> efficiency of production ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Data standardisation projects to improve supply cha<strong>in</strong> efficiency ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry wide e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> retail trade ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Collective <strong>in</strong>itiatives to improve <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s relationships with<br />
advertisers and <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated management development tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Better technological advice ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
B Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = best) <strong>in</strong>dicate how best <strong>the</strong> government can<br />
assist <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Change exist<strong>in</strong>g regulation, please specify __________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Stimulate market demand for new services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
End uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> relation to VAT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Entry to <strong>the</strong> Euro ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Expand access to broadband networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ensure that EU merger policy is transparent and consistent ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ensure fair media ownership framework ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ensure fair competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> flexible labour market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Improve <strong>the</strong> collection of statistics relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Undertake targeted export <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Invest <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and education ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> levels of fund<strong>in</strong>g for schools and libraries ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Ensure a favourable tax environment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
Undertake exemplary action <strong>in</strong> procurement and use of <strong>in</strong>formation ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
140
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Section 8 International competitiveness<br />
If you feel you have <strong>in</strong>sufficient knowledge of foreign publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries, please<br />
disregard this question.<br />
A Choose one country (o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />
UK) which you consider possesses <strong>the</strong><br />
most competitive publish<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />
with<strong>in</strong> your sector of <strong>the</strong> market.<br />
■ Name of country __________________________<br />
C Does your company benchmark itself<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st national or <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
competitors?<br />
■ National<br />
■ International<br />
■ Both<br />
■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
B Rate your agreement with <strong>the</strong>se statements <strong>in</strong> relation to your chosen country’s<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g companies:<br />
Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly<br />
agree agree disagree disagree<br />
1 Skill levels are higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
2 UK companies are keener to <strong>in</strong>vest ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
3 UK companies are more creative and <strong>in</strong>novative<br />
<strong>in</strong> new product development ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
4 UK companies are quicker to adopt new technologies ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
5 The UK has a more favourable regulatory environment ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
6 UK companies are more responsive to customers ■ ■ ■ ■<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g page is left blank for any additional comments you may wish to make.<br />
Thank you. Your help is much appreciated.<br />
Please email your completed questionnaire to sueo@pira.co.uk, alternatively<br />
return by fax to 01372 802249.<br />
><br />
141
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Appendix D<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> sources consulted<br />
Government and trade associations<br />
Department of Culture, Media and Sport<br />
• Creative Industries M<strong>in</strong>isterial Steer<strong>in</strong>g Group: 2nd<br />
• Creative Industries Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Document<br />
(March 2001)<br />
• Creative Industries Export Advisory Group: Exports:<br />
our Hidden Potential (November 1999)<br />
• Internet Inquiry: Snapshot of a Roll<strong>in</strong>g Wave<br />
(Feb. 2000)<br />
Office of National Statistics<br />
• Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, 1993-2000<br />
• PRODCOM reports, 1993-2000<br />
• Consumer Trends, 2001<br />
• UK Trade <strong>in</strong> Services, 2000<br />
• Standard Industrial Classification UK SIC 1992<br />
• Mat<strong>the</strong>w Barnes, Jonathan Haskel, Andrew Ross:<br />
Understand<strong>in</strong>g Productivity: new <strong>in</strong>sights from <strong>the</strong><br />
ONS bus<strong>in</strong>ess databank (April 2001)<br />
Department of Trade and Industry<br />
• UK Competitiveness Indicators Second<br />
Edition, 2001<br />
• Digital Content Action Plan (Feb 2000)<br />
• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Clusters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK (Feb 2001)<br />
• <strong>DTI</strong>/OST Information, Communication and Media<br />
(ICM) Panel: The Future and Development of<br />
Information Relationships (2001)<br />
• The Advance of Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, (Feb 1999)<br />
Publishers Association<br />
• UK Book Industry <strong>in</strong> Statistics,2000<br />
• UK publishers export sales by sector 1990-99<br />
• Trends <strong>in</strong> Journal Subscriptions, 1998<br />
• PA Brief on <strong>the</strong> Digital Curriculum, December 2000<br />
Newspaper Society<br />
• The Regional Press Factbook, March 2001<br />
• Consumer’s Choice IV, 2001<br />
• Reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Regions, 1997<br />
Periodical Publishers’ Association<br />
• The Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Handbook<br />
• Executive Summary (various issues)<br />
• B2B Media: opportunities for growth, May 2000<br />
PPA/Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• The Future of Retail<strong>in</strong>g: an overview of pressures<br />
on <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />
• Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Retail<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />
PPA/Blakes Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Magaz<strong>in</strong>es as Brands, May 1998<br />
EU Commission<br />
• The Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> European Union<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries, 2000<br />
• Second Community Innovations Survey, 1998<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r organisations<br />
• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess,<br />
<strong>the</strong> UK bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />
communication <strong>in</strong>dustry 2001<br />
• <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> National Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Organisation: Skills<br />
Foresight Report, April 2002<br />
• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association: Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Statistics<br />
Yearbook 2001 (NTC Publications)<br />
• Screen Digest/ABN AMRO Mediaphile 2010<br />
• Book Market<strong>in</strong>g Ltd: Book Facts 2000<br />
• Learned Information: The European Onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Information Market, Jan 2002<br />
142
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
• K<strong>in</strong>gston University/DPA 8th annual Directory and<br />
Database Publishers Association Survey, 2000<br />
• ALPSP/PA Journal <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Statistics Survey<br />
(TFPL Ltd)<br />
• Seymour: Launches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Market,<br />
Jan 2000<br />
• The Prospect Shop: Periodical publishers, 2001<br />
• Keynote: The Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Press 2001<br />
• McK<strong>in</strong>sey Quarterly: Magaz<strong>in</strong>es’ home companion<br />
Q1 2001<br />
• FIPP: World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends 2001<br />
• World Association of Newspapers: World Press<br />
Trends 2001<br />
• Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival <strong>in</strong> UK<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by Richard Disney, Jonathan Haskel<br />
and Ylva Heden<br />
• Ocean Consult<strong>in</strong>g: Media Brands 2002<br />
• Book Industry Communication: Returns: <strong>the</strong> New<br />
Process – A Code of Practice, July 2000<br />
• KPMG: Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize,<br />
Feb 1998<br />
• Paul Dobson: The impact of proposed national<br />
distribution developments on <strong>the</strong> UK regional press<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustry (‘The Dobson Report’), October 2000<br />
• British Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Industries Federation: Pr<strong>in</strong>t 21<br />
(June 2001)<br />
• Bookseller Publications: Book Retail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong><br />
2001<br />
Pira International<br />
• The Future of Pr<strong>in</strong>t (2000)<br />
• The Impact of E-commerce on <strong>the</strong> UK pr<strong>in</strong>t and<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries (May 2001)<br />
• The Future of Pr<strong>in</strong>t and Digital Media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
Age (April 2002)<br />
143
NPA<br />
Brita<strong>in</strong>’s National Press<br />
Members of <strong>the</strong> project control board<br />
Department of Trade and Industry<br />
Chris Mat<strong>the</strong>ws, Director,<br />
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> & New Media<br />
Susan Moore, Policy Advisor &<br />
Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Analyst, <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> & New Media<br />
Nick Rudoe, Statistical Advisor,<br />
Industry Economics and Statistics Directorate<br />
Michael Crosse, Economic Advisor,<br />
Industry Economics and Statistics Directorate<br />
Pira International<br />
Michael Hancock, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Director<br />
Richard Gray, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Manager<br />
Publishers Association<br />
Ronnie Williams, Chief Executive<br />
Periodical Publishers Association<br />
Ian Locks, Chief Executive<br />
Newspaper Publishers Association<br />
Steve Oram, Director<br />
Newspaper Society<br />
David Newell, Director<br />
Adviser to <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong><br />
David Worlock, Chairman,<br />
Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Services Ltd<br />
Our thanks for assistance from<br />
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers;<br />
Directory Publishers Association; Independent Publishers Guild;<br />
Digital Content Forum; British Internet Publishers Association;<br />
plus <strong>the</strong> large number of publishers and o<strong>the</strong>r key players<br />
across <strong>the</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors who gave valuable time,<br />
help and advice through <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews, focus groups,<br />
workshops, questionnaires, etc.<br />
Mike Casey and Susan Sparks,<br />
Pira International Report Authors.
<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />
Competitiveness analysis of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g media sector<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> report<br />
Department of Trade & Industry<br />
151 Buck<strong>in</strong>gham Palace Road,<br />
London SW1H 9SS, UK<br />
T +44 (0)20 7215 5000<br />
W www.dti.gov.uk<br />
Pira International Ltd<br />
Randalls Road, Lea<strong>the</strong>rhead,<br />
Surrey KT22 7RU, UK<br />
T +44 (0)1372 802000<br />
E publish@pira.co.uk<br />
W www.piranet.com