05.11.2014 Views

Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page

Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page

Publishing in the Knowledge Economy - DTI Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Competitiveness analysis of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g media sector<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> report


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> report<br />

This report was written by<br />

Pira International, as a project<br />

co-managed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong> & UK<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media, an alliance of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Newspaper Society, The<br />

Newspaper Publishers Association,<br />

The Periodical Publishers Association<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Publishers Association.<br />

The executive summary is available<br />

on-l<strong>in</strong>e at www.uk-publish<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>in</strong>fo and<br />

at www.dti.gov.uk/cii/services/<br />

content<strong>in</strong>dustry/pr<strong>in</strong>t_publish<strong>in</strong>g_and_<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation_<strong>in</strong>dustries.shtml<br />

© Crown Copyright 2002


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Contents<br />

Preface<br />

Part 1 The <strong>in</strong>dustry today 1<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction 2<br />

1.1 What is publish<strong>in</strong>g? 2<br />

1.1.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 2<br />

1.2.2 Newspapers 3<br />

1.2 How big is <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry? 3<br />

Chapter 2 Concepts of competitiveness 6<br />

2.1 Introduction 6<br />

2.2 Sector competitiveness as a concept 6<br />

2.3 The competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g –<br />

conceptual issues 6<br />

2.3.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition 6<br />

2.3.2 Comparisons 7<br />

2.4 Alternative approaches to measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

competitiveness 7<br />

2.5 Dual product markets 7<br />

Chapter 3 Drivers of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry 10<br />

3.1 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers 10<br />

3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends 10<br />

3.2.1 The share of publish<strong>in</strong>g 10<br />

3.2.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g by type 13<br />

3.2.3 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g forecast 13<br />

3.3 Consumer expenditure of money and time 13<br />

3.3.1 Money 13<br />

3.3.2 Personal spend<strong>in</strong>g and shopp<strong>in</strong>g trends 15<br />

3.4 Time 15<br />

3.5 Demographic changes 17<br />

3.6 O<strong>the</strong>r factors affect<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g 18<br />

3.6.1 Internet connectivity 18<br />

3.6.2 Reduc<strong>in</strong>g wastage 20<br />

Chapter 4 Size and performance of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry 22<br />

4.1 Turnover 22<br />

4.1.1 Revenues from licens<strong>in</strong>g and rights sales 22<br />

4.2 Costs and resources 24<br />

4.2.1 Paper prices 24<br />

4.3 Cross <strong>in</strong>dustry comparison 26<br />

4.4 International comparisons of productivity<br />

and <strong>in</strong>novation 28<br />

4.5 Conclusion 29<br />

iv<br />

Chapter 5 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g 30<br />

5.1 Revenues 30<br />

5.2 Export performance 30<br />

5.3 Titles 30<br />

5.4 Prices 33<br />

5.5 Profitability 33<br />

5.6 Employment, skills and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 33<br />

5.7 International comparisons 35<br />

Chapter 6 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g 36<br />

6.1 Revenues and costs 36<br />

6.2 Prices 37<br />

Chapter 7 Newspapers 38<br />

7.1 Revenue trends 38<br />

7.2 Circulation and cover prices 38<br />

7.3 Number of titles 38<br />

7.4 Employment and related issues 41<br />

7.5 Skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 42<br />

7.6 Productivity and costs 43<br />

7.7 International comparisons 44<br />

Chapter 8 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 46<br />

8.1 Activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector 46<br />

8.2 Revenues 46<br />

8.3 Copy sales and cover prices 46<br />

8.4 Titles and launches 48<br />

8.5 Returns and wastage 49<br />

8.6 Sales channels 49<br />

8.7 Brand extension 49<br />

8.8 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g 50<br />

8.9 Pan-magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector data 50<br />

8.9.1 Skill levels and skill shortages 50<br />

8.9.2 Profitability 51<br />

8.9.3 International comparisons 51<br />

Chapter 9 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media 54<br />

9.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 54<br />

9.1.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 54<br />

9.1.2 Number of titles 54<br />

9.1.3 Circulation 54<br />

9.1.4 Diversification of revenues 54<br />

9.2 Directories 57<br />

9.2.1 Nature of directories 57<br />

9.3 Newsletters and reports 59<br />

9.4 Onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM <strong>in</strong>formation vendors 60<br />

i


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Contents<br />

Chapter 10 The Internet 62<br />

10.1 Opportunities and threats 62<br />

10.2 Newspapers 62<br />

10.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es 62<br />

10.4 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 63<br />

10.5 Books 64<br />

Chapter 11 Analysis of gaps <strong>in</strong><br />

data sources 66<br />

11.1 General comments 66<br />

11.2 Official versus unofficial statistics 66<br />

11.3 Sub-sectors 66<br />

11.3.1 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />

11.3.2 Newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />

11.3.3 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g 66<br />

11.3.4 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g 67<br />

11.3.5 Database and directory publish<strong>in</strong>g 67<br />

11.3.6 Newsletters 67<br />

11.4 Summary of def<strong>in</strong>itional issues and data gaps 68<br />

Chapter 12 Typology of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

products accord<strong>in</strong>g to brand and<br />

format characteristics 70<br />

12.1 Brand 70<br />

12.2 Importance of format 70<br />

12.3 Consumer media 70<br />

12.4 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess media 71<br />

12.5 Education and research market 71<br />

Chapter 13 Strengths, weaknesses,<br />

opportunities and threats 72<br />

13.1 Introduction 72<br />

13.2 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> – common strengths and issues 72<br />

13.3 Books 74<br />

13.4 Journals 76<br />

13.5 Newspapers 78<br />

13.6 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess media and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation 80<br />

Chapter 14 Future scenarios 82<br />

14.1 Introduction 82<br />

14.2 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios 82<br />

14.2.1 Lifestyle 82<br />

14.2.2 Work 82<br />

14.2.3 Technology 82<br />

14.2.4 <strong>Economy</strong> 82<br />

14.3 The chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy scenarios 83<br />

14.3.1 Slow adaptation to a slowly develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy 83<br />

14.3.2 The fast pace of <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy catches publishers unaware 84<br />

14.3.3 Careful transition of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy 85<br />

14.4 Scenario conclusion 85<br />

ii


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Part 2 Issues for competitiveness 87<br />

Chapter 15 The challenge of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able growth 88<br />

15.1 Introduction 88<br />

15.2 Take <strong>the</strong> wrapper off 88<br />

15.3 Can <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g iIndustry compete<br />

on a global scale? 89<br />

15.3.1 Strengths and opportunities 89<br />

15.3.2 Challenges 91<br />

15.4 The skills to compete 93<br />

15.4.1 Strengths and opportunities 94<br />

15.4.2 Challenges 94<br />

15.5 Industry profile 95<br />

15.5.1 Strengths and opportunities 95<br />

15.5.2 Challenges 96<br />

15.6 Industry statistics 97<br />

15.7 Technology adoption 97<br />

15.7.1 Strengths and opportunities 97<br />

15.7.2 Challenges 98<br />

Chapter 16 The challenge of changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> customer behaviour 100<br />

16.1 Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

end customer 101<br />

16.1.1 Strengths and opportunities 101<br />

16.1.2 Challenges 101<br />

16.2 Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser more effectively 102<br />

16.3 Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance of<br />

revenue streams 103<br />

16.3.1 Strengths and opportunities 104<br />

16.3.2 Challenges 104<br />

16.4 Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> customer 106<br />

16.4.1 Strengths and opportunities 106<br />

16.4.2 Challenges 106<br />

16.4.3 Supermarkets and super news retailers 109<br />

16.4.4 Postal services 109<br />

16.4.5 Conclusions and actions 109<br />

Chapter 17 The challenge of<br />

digital media 112<br />

17.1 Strengths and opportunities 112<br />

17.2 Challenges 112<br />

17.2.1 The chang<strong>in</strong>g competitive landscape 112<br />

17.2.2 Competition from publicly funded bodies 114<br />

17.2.3 Copyright protection 115<br />

17.2.4 Standards 116<br />

17.2.5 Journal archiv<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />

17.2.6 Gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g 116<br />

17.2.7 Taxation 117<br />

17.2.8 Regulation of digital content 117<br />

17.2.9 Caution on new platforms 117<br />

Chapter 18 The conclusions and<br />

proposed action plan 120<br />

18.1 Conclusions 120<br />

18.2 Proposed action plan 120<br />

18.2.1 Essential actions 121<br />

18.2.2 Necessary actions 123<br />

18.2.3 Desirable actions 124<br />

Appendices 125<br />

A Methodology 126<br />

B Participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study 128<br />

C Text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire 130<br />

D Ma<strong>in</strong> sources consulted 142<br />

iii


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Preface<br />

This report and Action Plan has been commissioned by <strong>the</strong> Department of Trade and Industry (<strong>DTI</strong>)<br />

as part of a series of <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> competitive performance and <strong>the</strong> factors promot<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

imped<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness <strong>in</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors. This project has been co-managed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong><br />

and UK <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media (UKPM), an alliance of <strong>the</strong> Newspaper Society (NS), <strong>the</strong> Newspaper<br />

Publishers Association (NPA), The Periodical Publishers Association (PPA) and <strong>the</strong> Publishers<br />

Association (PA).<br />

The scope of <strong>the</strong> project has been wide rang<strong>in</strong>g, cover<strong>in</strong>g books, national and regional<br />

newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es, journals, newsletters, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, directory and database<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g and Internet publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

A description of <strong>the</strong> methodology used; details of <strong>the</strong> many companies and organisations who<br />

assisted us by fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> questionnaires and attend<strong>in</strong>g workshops; data sources consulted and <strong>the</strong><br />

text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire are conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendices to <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

A separate Executive Summary for this report is available.<br />

iv


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

PART1<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

1


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

PART11<br />

Introduction<br />

1.1 What is publish<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Historically, publish<strong>in</strong>g has been <strong>in</strong>extricably<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> production of pr<strong>in</strong>ted material,<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of books, scholarly journals,<br />

newspapers or magaz<strong>in</strong>es. As we shall argue<br />

throughout this report, while <strong>the</strong>re is no sign of<br />

<strong>the</strong> disappearance of pr<strong>in</strong>t as a medium, it is no<br />

longer helpful to conceive of publish<strong>in</strong>g solely <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se terms. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, publish<strong>in</strong>g is a set of<br />

skills and core competences consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

acquisition, selection, edit<strong>in</strong>g, management,<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g and sale of content. The ‘wrapper’,<br />

or more likely ‘wrappers’, <strong>in</strong> which this content<br />

reaches its f<strong>in</strong>al user is not <strong>the</strong> crucial factor.<br />

What is crucial for publishers is that <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

able to evolve <strong>the</strong>ir skill sets and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> user <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to rema<strong>in</strong> strong and vibrant.<br />

1.1.1 A global bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Thanks to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational use of English, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

has always been an important <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

dimension to <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s<br />

activity, especially <strong>in</strong> book and journal<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g. This use of English is spread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> traditional English speak<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

of <strong>the</strong> world as English becomes <strong>the</strong> preferred<br />

second language <strong>in</strong> many countries. This is<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g new opportunities for UK publishers.<br />

There are also challenges here <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

competition with <strong>the</strong> US <strong>in</strong> Third World<br />

countries, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of<br />

penetrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> US market.<br />

Both <strong>in</strong>ternational competition, and <strong>the</strong> need<br />

to deliver content <strong>in</strong> whatever form and via<br />

whatever channel <strong>the</strong> customer wants, push<br />

publishers towards greater scale <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

operations. At <strong>the</strong> same time, it is important that<br />

smaller publishers – which are often <strong>the</strong> source<br />

of <strong>in</strong>novation – are still able to secure footholds<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marketplace.<br />

The UK has not produced a player of global<br />

Table note This list is not <strong>in</strong>tended to be<br />

comprehensive. Some companies are foreign-owned,<br />

but have significant economic activity with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

Table 1 Lead<strong>in</strong>g UK publish<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

BBC Worldwide<br />

Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

EMAP<br />

Haymarket<br />

IPC<br />

John Brown<br />

National Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information<br />

Redwood<br />

United Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Media<br />

Newspapers<br />

Daily Mail and General Trust (Associated<br />

Newspapers and Northcliffe)<br />

Guardian Media Group<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times (Pearson)<br />

Johnston Press<br />

News International<br />

Newsquest<br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror<br />

The Telegraph (Holl<strong>in</strong>ger)<br />

Books and journals<br />

BBC Worldwide<br />

Blackwell Science<br />

Bloomsbury<br />

Cambridge University Press<br />

Dorl<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>dersley (Pearson)<br />

Faber & Faber<br />

HarperColl<strong>in</strong>s (News International)<br />

Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e (WH Smith)<br />

Little, Brown (AOL/Time Warner)<br />

John Murray<br />

Macmillan (Holtzbr<strong>in</strong>ck)<br />

Orion (Hachette)<br />

Oxford University Press<br />

Pengu<strong>in</strong> (Pearson)<br />

Random House (Bertelsmann)<br />

Reed Elsevier<br />

Scholastic<br />

Taylor and Francis<br />

Transworld (Bertelsmann)<br />

John Wiley<br />

Source Pira International<br />

2 © Pira International Ltd


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

scale <strong>in</strong> consumer publish<strong>in</strong>g, along <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es of<br />

Germany’s Bertelsmann. But it has been able to<br />

produce companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of academic,<br />

educational and bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g that are<br />

world leaders, such as Reed Elsevier and<br />

Pearson.<br />

Reuters is also a truly global player, both <strong>in</strong> its<br />

traditional news agency role and <strong>in</strong> its much<br />

larger f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation bus<strong>in</strong>esses, as<br />

well as its bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation ventures. In its<br />

<strong>in</strong>novative conjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of technology and content,<br />

and its development of new skills <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g, it may prefigure much of <strong>the</strong> future of<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

1.1.2 Social, political and cultural issues<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is not simply a bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Its products<br />

are hugely <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> education system<br />

and <strong>the</strong> social, cultural and political life of <strong>the</strong><br />

UK. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficult decisions that<br />

face governments and regulators <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

taxation, concentration of ownership, regulation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> nature of published content (privacy,<br />

obscenity, libel), and <strong>the</strong> degree to which<br />

publishers are allowed to make use of personal<br />

data. This latter po<strong>in</strong>t is particularly important <strong>in</strong><br />

be<strong>in</strong>g able to tailor products and services to <strong>the</strong><br />

user, and also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued availability of<br />

some products such as directories. Digital<br />

technologies also pose important challenges to<br />

<strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g copyright regime. There is a need to<br />

reconcile <strong>the</strong> necessary reward to <strong>the</strong> creators<br />

of knowledge and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment with <strong>the</strong> need<br />

for society to have access to <strong>the</strong>se products <strong>in</strong><br />

ways that are not over restrictive or that exclude<br />

whole sections of society.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />

economy is a major source of demand for <strong>the</strong><br />

products and services of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

and a source of supply for academic, STM and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> behaviour of consumers pose<br />

particular challenges to <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

The consumer appears to be devot<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

money, but less time, to many of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

products of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, as media<br />

and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment choices proliferate.<br />

Demographic change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of an age<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population may favour some products <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

short term, but <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> longer term may pose<br />

a threat to read<strong>in</strong>g as a leisure pursuit.<br />

The shift<strong>in</strong>g pattern of shopp<strong>in</strong>g activity also<br />

poses problems for <strong>the</strong> distribution of physical<br />

newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, potentially<br />

weaken<strong>in</strong>g newspaper buy<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

narrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> range of magaz<strong>in</strong>es on offer.<br />

1.2 How big is <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry?<br />

Because of <strong>the</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g boundaries of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, it is not straightforward to answer<br />

this question. There are, <strong>in</strong> fact, a number of<br />

different answers, based on <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

used <strong>in</strong> official statistics and unofficial ones.<br />

This problem will be discussed <strong>in</strong> more detail<br />

<strong>in</strong> Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report. This section will conf<strong>in</strong>e<br />

itself to a brief overview and some illustrative<br />

comparisons.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> official Standard Industrial<br />

Classification, publish<strong>in</strong>g activity is covered by<br />

SIC 22.1 and total turnover for that classification<br />

for <strong>the</strong> latest available year, 2000, is £18.37bn.<br />

This appears to understate some of <strong>the</strong> faster<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, particularly<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and excludes activities such as<br />

exhibitions and conferences, databases, news<br />

agencies and ‘advertis<strong>in</strong>g-related activities’ by<br />

plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIC.<br />

The DCMS report Mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Creative<br />

Industries produced a size for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry of<br />

about £18.5bn <strong>in</strong> 1999. Tak<strong>in</strong>g some unofficial<br />

data for net revenues for newspapers and<br />

conventional consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es and sales of<br />

books and add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> revenues from customer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities<br />

(drawn from <strong>the</strong> special study Connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess) gives a total turnover of just over<br />

£22bn <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

It would be fair to say that <strong>the</strong> datasets for<br />

which <strong>the</strong>re are time series all record a picture<br />

of healthy growth. Series cover<strong>in</strong>g particular<br />

sectors will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 2.<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> smallest of <strong>the</strong> turnover<br />

estimates of £18.37bn with o<strong>the</strong>r UK ><br />

3


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries shows that, <strong>in</strong> terms of turnover,<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g is bigger than <strong>the</strong> manufacture of<br />

pharmaceuticals (SIC 24.4) with a turnover of<br />

£12.03bn. In terms of employment, aga<strong>in</strong><br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to official figures, publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

employed 164,000 people <strong>in</strong> 2000, while<br />

pharmaceuticals employed 65,000. Its turnover<br />

is almost half <strong>the</strong> size of that of<br />

telecommunications (SIC 64.2), which had<br />

a turnover <strong>in</strong> 2000 of £42bn and employed<br />

234,000. Clearly, if <strong>the</strong> larger estimates for<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g are correct, and we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

official figures do understate both turnover and<br />

employment, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> comparisons are even<br />

more startl<strong>in</strong>g. Startl<strong>in</strong>g, because although <strong>the</strong><br />

products of publish<strong>in</strong>g are all around us every<br />

day, as an <strong>in</strong>dustry it does not have <strong>the</strong> profile<br />

its size would justify.<br />

4


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

2<br />

Concepts of competitiveness<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

This section of <strong>the</strong> report will try to pa<strong>in</strong>t a<br />

picture of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as it currently is,<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g its performance us<strong>in</strong>g a set of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators for <strong>the</strong> sector as a whole and its<br />

constituent parts. It will beg<strong>in</strong> by discuss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

conceptual and practical issues we encountered<br />

<strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators and attempt<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

source data to match <strong>the</strong>m. Then, we discuss<br />

and illustrate drivers for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends, consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and time use, and demographics. We go on to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e some cross-<strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

comparisons, followed by a discussion of<br />

selected f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at <strong>the</strong> level of publish<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n at sub-sector level. There is <strong>the</strong>n a<br />

discussion of <strong>the</strong> response of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry to <strong>the</strong> Internet, which is followed by<br />

a section summaris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> areas where data<br />

is unavailable or unreliable.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quantitative analysis, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a section describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> strengths and<br />

weaknesses, opportunities and threats fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. This is based on desk research<br />

and on <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>in</strong>dicators, as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> questionnaire responses, <strong>in</strong>terviews and<br />

focus groups held dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong><br />

project. F<strong>in</strong>ally, this section discusses scenarios<br />

fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

2.2 Sector competitiveness as a concept<br />

Competitiveness is about <strong>the</strong> extent to which<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dividual firm, or national <strong>in</strong>dustry, can<br />

survive and susta<strong>in</strong> itself, and <strong>the</strong> agility with<br />

which it can respond to opportunities and<br />

threats. A firm’s competitive advantage can lie <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ability to produce at low cost; <strong>in</strong> proprietary<br />

assets; <strong>in</strong> a high rate of <strong>in</strong>novation; <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

high quality well differentiated products, and so<br />

on. This depends on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> which it is<br />

engaged, <strong>the</strong> stability of technology, barriers to<br />

entry, <strong>the</strong> rate of entry and exit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />

and so forth.<br />

Sectoral competitiveness analysis throws up<br />

some methodology issues. While it is fairly<br />

straightforward to understand what is meant by<br />

<strong>the</strong> competitiveness of an <strong>in</strong>dividual company,<br />

<strong>the</strong> notion of <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of an entire<br />

sector is more problematic. In <strong>the</strong> first place,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of a sector,<br />

which is rarely clear cut. In <strong>the</strong> second place,<br />

with<strong>in</strong> any sector <strong>the</strong>re will be some companies<br />

that are extremely competitive and o<strong>the</strong>rs that<br />

are fail<strong>in</strong>g. In terms of def<strong>in</strong>ition, sectors are<br />

bound to be blurred at <strong>the</strong> edges. It may well be<br />

that with<strong>in</strong> a broad sector, <strong>the</strong>re are a number<br />

of identifiable sub-sectors, some of which are<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g and healthy, o<strong>the</strong>rs of which are<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Activity may be migrat<strong>in</strong>g away from<br />

some sub-sectors <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>rs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector,<br />

or <strong>in</strong>to an adjacent sector.<br />

The economy is <strong>in</strong> constant flux, and it is<br />

po<strong>in</strong>tless to be too obsessed with def<strong>in</strong>itions.<br />

The competitiveness analysis must aim to<br />

capture this movement and <strong>the</strong> common issues<br />

and problems for <strong>the</strong> sector. Competitiveness is<br />

also a comparative concept by its very nature.<br />

This raises <strong>the</strong> issue what should publish<strong>in</strong>g’s<br />

performance be compared to – o<strong>the</strong>r sectors<br />

of <strong>the</strong> UK economy, <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

competitors or both?<br />

2.3 The competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– conceptual issues<br />

Measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of publish<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

particularly prone to <strong>the</strong> problems outl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

above, firstly of def<strong>in</strong>ition, secondly of<br />

comparison, and f<strong>in</strong>ally of data availability<br />

(which is related to <strong>the</strong> first two).<br />

2.3.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has historically been l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong><br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process of pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. The two<br />

activities have become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly decoupled<br />

<strong>in</strong> recent years, even more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

rest of Europe, but <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kage has left a legacy<br />

of <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed statistics. Secondly, <strong>the</strong> activities<br />

of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies – especially <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

and most important ones – have <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

come to span <strong>the</strong> whole gamut of pr<strong>in</strong>t products,<br />

and have expanded beyond pr<strong>in</strong>t on paper to<br />

electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g, conferences and<br />

exhibitions, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and audio-visual media. But<br />

this shift is not reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way that <strong>the</strong><br />

6


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

statistics are collected, which still tends to be<br />

conf<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> old divisions of books,<br />

newspapers and periodicals. This division is<br />

adhered to by official bodies, such as <strong>the</strong> Office<br />

of National Statistics and Eurostat. These<br />

bodies <strong>in</strong>evitably lag beh<strong>in</strong>d developments <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> economy by some years because of <strong>the</strong><br />

need to ga<strong>in</strong> broad agreement on <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />

trade classifications – <strong>the</strong>se aren’t lightly<br />

changed because of <strong>the</strong> importance of<br />

comparison over time and between countries.<br />

These problems are exacerbated <strong>in</strong> a sector like<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g where <strong>the</strong> speed and extent of<br />

change has been significant <strong>in</strong> recent years.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry itself has also largely<br />

collected statistics on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />

divisions. Of course, it may be argued that any<br />

system of collection must be product focused<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than company focused, s<strong>in</strong>ce a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

company can produce a wide range of products<br />

across many <strong>in</strong>dustries. The difficulty <strong>in</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g is that <strong>the</strong> core asset – content – can<br />

be manifested <strong>in</strong> a range of forms. It may be <strong>the</strong><br />

identical content, but it may have added-value<br />

features – for example <strong>in</strong> its electronic form it<br />

may be searchable or it may be possible to<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrate it <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> customer’s own computer<br />

system. It may be complementary content, for<br />

example many newspaper websites differ from<br />

<strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted edition of <strong>the</strong> paper. The current data<br />

collection process does not really capture that<br />

dynamic <strong>in</strong> any way.<br />

2.3.2 Comparisons<br />

Some sectors are highly exposed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational competition through trade, while<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs are, for various reasons, largely<br />

protected. In <strong>the</strong> case of much of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sector this protection is due to language and<br />

cultural barriers to <strong>the</strong> import of published goods<br />

from elsewhere, as well as to <strong>the</strong> physical<br />

problems of distribut<strong>in</strong>g time-critical products,<br />

such as newspapers, across large distances.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> Internet has exposed some products,<br />

for example <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times, to <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

competition <strong>in</strong> its home market, <strong>the</strong> effect is still<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>al to <strong>the</strong> newspaper sector as a whole.<br />

Book publish<strong>in</strong>g is a sector where <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

trade is important but, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly, it is difficult<br />

to measure its performance solely by means of<br />

<strong>the</strong> trade balance. This is because <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

is becom<strong>in</strong>g more globalised: as well as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exported, books are licensed to local publishers,<br />

or produced overseas by <strong>the</strong> company itself or<br />

sent electronically to be pr<strong>in</strong>ted on demand <strong>in</strong><br />

local markets. The revenue from <strong>the</strong>se activities<br />

is treated <strong>in</strong> different ways by different<br />

publishers, but generally <strong>the</strong> results are opaque<br />

to <strong>the</strong> outside observer.<br />

2.4 Alternative approaches to measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

competitiveness<br />

If products are <strong>in</strong>ternationally traded, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

clearly <strong>the</strong> trade balance is one way of<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness. In <strong>the</strong> absence of<br />

this, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> approach taken was to attempt to<br />

measure <strong>the</strong> efficiency with which companies<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a sector use <strong>in</strong>puts, or its productivity, <strong>in</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words. This is because <strong>the</strong> sector’s<br />

outputs form <strong>in</strong>puts to <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

and <strong>the</strong>refore its efficiency or o<strong>the</strong>rwise is a<br />

benefit or a cost to o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

A sector’s output may form part of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure of an economy, which also has a<br />

major impact on o<strong>the</strong>r economic activity. In <strong>the</strong><br />

case of publish<strong>in</strong>g, its outputs are part of <strong>the</strong><br />

cultural and political life of <strong>the</strong> country as well as<br />

<strong>in</strong>puts to o<strong>the</strong>r economic activity. For some<br />

sectors, <strong>the</strong> price of output is <strong>the</strong> key variable of<br />

concern (as an <strong>in</strong>put to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors). For<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g, price is important (for example<br />

books and newspapers need to be with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

reach of <strong>the</strong> mass of people, and <strong>the</strong> price of<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation is significant for company<br />

competitiveness), but variety, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />

quality are also extremely important. In addition,<br />

we must try to benchmark a sector’s<br />

performance aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> performance of<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g sectors <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />

2.5 Dual product markets<br />

Many publish<strong>in</strong>g products (newspapers,<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, some directories and newsletters,<br />

much electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g, exhibitions and ><br />

7


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

some events and conferences) operate <strong>in</strong> dual<br />

product markets, where <strong>the</strong> publisher sells a<br />

product to an end-user (whe<strong>the</strong>r consumer or<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess) but also sells <strong>the</strong> attention of that<br />

end-user to an advertiser. For <strong>the</strong>se publishers,<br />

<strong>the</strong> growth and distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

expenditure is critical, as well as <strong>the</strong> growth and<br />

distribution of consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g and trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> revenue growth and profitability for <strong>the</strong><br />

corporate sector. The competitiveness of large<br />

parts of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is certa<strong>in</strong>ly substantially<br />

self-def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms of its ability to attract<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue. Hence <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

accorded to advertis<strong>in</strong>g data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

8


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

3<br />

Drivers of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

3.1 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers<br />

There are two major drivers for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

market: advertis<strong>in</strong>g and consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Clearly <strong>the</strong>re is a well-established relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se and <strong>the</strong> economic cycle.<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g tends to expand as a proportion of<br />

gross value-added dur<strong>in</strong>g periods of boom and<br />

contract as a proportion <strong>in</strong> times of recession.<br />

Corporate revenue and profitability is a driver of<br />

both advertis<strong>in</strong>g and of purchases of bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es and<br />

directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, and spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on conferences and exhibitions. As profits can<br />

take some time to recover from recessions, this<br />

impacts on <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of publish<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />

recovery. Consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g is obviously<br />

related both to measurable factors, such as<br />

economic growth and employment levels, and<br />

to ‘consumer confidence’, which can be<br />

enhanced or damaged by many o<strong>the</strong>r factors.<br />

As well as cyclical factors, <strong>the</strong> share of both<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that will be achieved by <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

are also subject to more structural changes.<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> competes with o<strong>the</strong>r vehicles for<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g, from television to bus shelters, at<br />

least <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> attention of viewers/<br />

readers. Advertisers may perceive that different<br />

forms of advertis<strong>in</strong>g are more cost-effective,<br />

and switch to those. Consumer use of media<br />

products is affected by <strong>the</strong> time at <strong>the</strong>ir disposal<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>comes, and <strong>the</strong> proliferation of<br />

demands on <strong>the</strong>ir time and money is an issue<br />

that will recur <strong>in</strong> this report. As media is a<br />

discretionary purchase, fashion and<br />

generational change are also crucial. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

to bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g and bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

is also constantly faced with opportunities and<br />

threats aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g fortunes of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries it serves, <strong>the</strong> latest example be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

headlong expansion of telecommunications and<br />

<strong>the</strong> subsequent ‘correction’.<br />

Time spent on media use will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report. Drivers of particular subsectors,<br />

such as education spend<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.<br />

textbooks and journals), will also be exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of discussion of issues affect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>se sub-sectors.<br />

3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />

The charts opposite depict <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong><br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980, first <strong>in</strong><br />

constant 1995 prices (Figure 3.1) and <strong>the</strong>n as<br />

a percentage of gross value-added (Figure 3.2).<br />

They clearly show <strong>the</strong> broad upward trend <strong>in</strong><br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g, both absolutely and as a proportion of<br />

GVA, broken only by <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> recession<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s. Indications for 2001 will be<br />

discussed separately.<br />

3.2.1 The share of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> press (i.e.<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, newspapers and bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

professional media, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g directories) <strong>in</strong><br />

total advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend (Figure 3.3), <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a significant decl<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980, from around<br />

60% to around 50%. Although television has put<br />

on about three percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>the</strong> more<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong>s are those made by direct mail<br />

and radio, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y represent a step change <strong>in</strong><br />

share, while television has hovered around 25-<br />

27% for many years. The Internet makes a late<br />

appearance, and clearly some element of that<br />

will be accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> owners of <strong>the</strong> press,<br />

although it amounted to less than £200m <strong>in</strong><br />

2000, it outstripped c<strong>in</strong>ema.<br />

However, it is important to stress that although<br />

<strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> press has decl<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> total<br />

revenues accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> press from advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

have grown strongly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same period.<br />

10


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 3.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure <strong>in</strong> real terms<br />

Figure 3.3 Share of advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend by medium<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

100<br />

• Internet<br />

• C<strong>in</strong>ema<br />

• Radio<br />

Outdoor & transport<br />

• DM<br />

6000<br />

80<br />

4000<br />

60<br />

2000<br />

40<br />

20<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

• TV • Total press 2000<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 3.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure as<br />

a percentage of gross value-added<br />

2.5<br />

Figure 3.4 Total press advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

10000, £m<br />

2.0<br />

8000<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

6000<br />

0.5<br />

4000<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

2000<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

><br />

11


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 3.5 Press media share of expenditure<br />

on advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

25, % National newspapers<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and professional<br />

• Regional newspapers • Directories<br />

Figure 3.7 Real advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure forecasts<br />

20, %<br />

20<br />

15<br />

15<br />

10<br />

10<br />

5<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Source Pira<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

• Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es 2000<br />

1998<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 3.6 Changes <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

by type <strong>in</strong> real terms<br />

15000, £m<br />

12000<br />

Press classified<br />

Press display<br />

•<br />

Total display<br />

9000<br />

6000<br />

3000<br />

1980<br />

1982<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

12


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The share of different publish<strong>in</strong>g media<br />

Figure 3.5 shows <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> different<br />

‘press’ media. Regional newspapers have<br />

clearly lost most share, with national<br />

newspapers and consumer, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

professional magaz<strong>in</strong>es hold<strong>in</strong>g quite steady<br />

and directories ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> period. Shares of advertis<strong>in</strong>g are affected<br />

not just by gradual changes, but by <strong>the</strong> step<br />

changes aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of new<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g media or <strong>the</strong> sudden expansion of<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs due to specific events, such as new<br />

licences be<strong>in</strong>g made available. Radio is a case<br />

<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t – its share grew follow<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong><br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g that permitted a major <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

number of commercial stations.<br />

3.2.2 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g by type<br />

It is also useful to look at <strong>the</strong> type of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– broadly <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between display and<br />

classified. This is because <strong>the</strong> drivers and <strong>the</strong><br />

threats to advertis<strong>in</strong>g vary accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> type<br />

of advertis<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> type of advertiser.<br />

Different media have vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />

dependence on different types of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and also, with<strong>in</strong> different media, particularly<br />

newspapers, dependence varies with <strong>the</strong> nature<br />

of <strong>the</strong> paper, e.g. tabloid or broadsheet. This is<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r way of say<strong>in</strong>g that all media don’t<br />

necessarily compete head to head for all types<br />

of advertis<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>y do compete for<br />

‘eyeballs’. This issue will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> greater<br />

detail elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report, especially <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to <strong>the</strong> challenges posed by <strong>the</strong> Internet.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.6 shows a very strong<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> press classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g, and a<br />

relatively weak growth <strong>in</strong> press display<br />

compared to o<strong>the</strong>r types of display advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The differential performance of regional and<br />

national newspapers will be discussed below.<br />

A by-product of <strong>the</strong> dot.com boom was <strong>the</strong><br />

temporary <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue both<br />

for publishers’ pr<strong>in</strong>t products and onl<strong>in</strong>e sites<br />

from dot.coms seek<strong>in</strong>g to build brand and drive<br />

traffic to <strong>the</strong>ir sites, and <strong>the</strong> loss of this revenue<br />

is a factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last year to 18 months.<br />

3.2.3 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g forecast<br />

Figure 3.7 shows our forecast for advertis<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

<strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>the</strong> decade. The chart shows<br />

three possible outcomes for total advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

revenues for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>the</strong> decade.<br />

• The middle, heavy l<strong>in</strong>e shows a central<br />

forecast for advertis<strong>in</strong>g based on its historical<br />

trends and relationship with <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> economy as a whole. This l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

represents a cont<strong>in</strong>uation of forces that have<br />

reshaped <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 10 years. It<br />

predicts that 2002 expenditure will be similar<br />

to <strong>the</strong> previous year, with modest growth of<br />

only 2.5% <strong>in</strong> current terms, but <strong>the</strong>reafter<br />

revenues bounce back and cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow<br />

<strong>in</strong> real terms by 4-5% per annum.<br />

• The higher l<strong>in</strong>e is based on <strong>the</strong> Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Association’s ‘High Option’ <strong>in</strong> its 2001 forecast<br />

of long-term trends <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure.<br />

It predicts a quicker bounce back and longterm<br />

annual growth of 5-6% <strong>in</strong> current<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditures.<br />

• The lower l<strong>in</strong>e is based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

our forecast for 2002 followed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association’s ‘Low Option’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same study, where revenues are assumed to<br />

grow by 3-4% per annum for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of<br />

<strong>the</strong> decade.<br />

3.3 Consumer expenditure of<br />

money and time<br />

3.3.1 Money<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> recently published Mediaphile<br />

2010 report from Screen Digest/ABN AMRO,<br />

which analyses all aspects of consumer<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on media s<strong>in</strong>ce 1985, consumer<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on all media products, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>t,<br />

music, TV, video, c<strong>in</strong>ema, mobile and Internet,<br />

both hardware and software, rose from 3.5% of<br />

net <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 6.8% <strong>in</strong> 2000. However,<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on pr<strong>in</strong>t media rema<strong>in</strong>ed virtually static<br />

<strong>in</strong> real terms over that period, and its share of<br />

total media spend fell from 48% <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 20%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2000. As pr<strong>in</strong>t products have relatively low<br />

prices compared with, for example, video, music<br />

and pay-TV, and as <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> disposable<br />

<strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion devoted to ><br />

13


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 3.8 Consumer expenditure on recreational<br />

and cultural products<br />

Figure 3.9 Trends <strong>in</strong> consumer credit and<br />

out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

9%<br />

8<br />

7<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Outstand<strong>in</strong>g consumer credit, % GDP<br />

No. of out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g centres<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

2006<br />

2008<br />

2010<br />

0<br />

1987<br />

1989<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

0<br />

Source Pira<br />

Source Pira<br />

14


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

leisure and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment have risen<br />

substantially, this fall <strong>in</strong> share is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and may not <strong>in</strong> itself matter. The same report<br />

forecasts sales of books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es will<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to rise until 2010, although at a slower<br />

rate than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1985-2000 (books by<br />

3.6% per annum, compared with 5.5%;<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es by 2.1% per annum, compared with<br />

8%). Newspaper sales will, accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Mediaphile, slow to 0.2% per annum <strong>in</strong> 2001-<br />

2010, compared with an average growth of<br />

3.3% <strong>in</strong> 1985-2000.<br />

But <strong>the</strong>se overall figures can disguise some<br />

important trends. For example, <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />

consumers buy<strong>in</strong>g books has fallen, although<br />

book sales are ris<strong>in</strong>g, perhaps lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

conclusion that <strong>the</strong> population is divid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

heavy readers and non-readers.<br />

Figure 3.8 shows our forecast for spend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

recreational and leisure products.<br />

3.3.2 Personal spend<strong>in</strong>g and shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trends<br />

■ Growth <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g has been <strong>the</strong><br />

motor driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> economy for much of <strong>the</strong><br />

last two decades.<br />

The chart illustrates <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g importance<br />

of recreational and cultural goods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

books, newspapers and periodicals as well as<br />

garden<strong>in</strong>g, records, leisure software, sports<br />

and home computers, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s, and<br />

produces forecasts for <strong>the</strong> next 10 years that<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> upward trend. The rate of growth<br />

for this sector is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with forecasts<br />

produced by o<strong>the</strong>r organisations, such as<br />

ABN-AMRO’s Mediaphile.<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> amount consumers spend,<br />

where <strong>the</strong>y spend it is also an important factor<br />

for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, especially<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers. The follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chart shows our forecast for consumer credit<br />

and out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

■ The cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g trend towards what might be<br />

called ‘consumption as lifestyle’ is most likely<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>ue if two relatively recent<br />

developments <strong>in</strong> UK retail<strong>in</strong>g are ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

■ Figure 3.9 shows <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> consumer<br />

credit (l<strong>in</strong>e) toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> total numbers of<br />

out-of-town shopp<strong>in</strong>g centres (area).<br />

■ Consumer credit has risen sharply <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last<br />

10 years, from under six percent of <strong>in</strong>come to<br />

nearly 14%. A sharp downturn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

market or a rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rates might halt this<br />

trend, but even <strong>the</strong> recession of <strong>the</strong> early<br />

1990s barely dented it.<br />

■ After a pause <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s when plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regulations were tightened, out-of-town<br />

centres have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

importance as dest<strong>in</strong>ations for shopp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The juxtaposition of <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> out-of-town<br />

shopp<strong>in</strong>g and consumer credit is not <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />

imply any relationship between <strong>the</strong> two. They<br />

are simply two trends that have significant<br />

impacts for publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3.4 Time<br />

What is somewhat more worry<strong>in</strong>g is that <strong>the</strong><br />

time devoted to read<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ted products is<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mediaphile, <strong>the</strong> average<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes per week spent on pr<strong>in</strong>t media (books,<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers) has fallen from<br />

106 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> 1985 to 81 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

While time spent onl<strong>in</strong>e is ris<strong>in</strong>g (83 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong><br />

2000), <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> beneficiaries of <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

media time usage have been radio, leisure<br />

software (ma<strong>in</strong>ly game consoles), video and<br />

music, as well as mobile phone usage. These<br />

averages of course cover those people who<br />

read noth<strong>in</strong>g at all, and <strong>the</strong>re is o<strong>the</strong>r evidence<br />

– <strong>in</strong> connection with book read<strong>in</strong>g, for example<br />

– which suggests that whole age groups do little<br />

book read<strong>in</strong>g at all, while <strong>the</strong> amount of book<br />

read<strong>in</strong>g undertaken by o<strong>the</strong>r age and gender<br />

groups is ris<strong>in</strong>g substantially.<br />

It must also be noted that some media usage<br />

takes place simultaneously with o<strong>the</strong>r activities,<br />

particularly broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. But this is unlikely to<br />

be particularly beneficial to publish<strong>in</strong>g. As much<br />

as 20% of radio listen<strong>in</strong>g occurs while driv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

for example, and <strong>in</strong>creased use of <strong>the</strong> car for<br />

travell<strong>in</strong>g to work could well have displaced<br />

newspaper read<strong>in</strong>g. This data forms an<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g backdrop to <strong>the</strong> push by media ><br />

15


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 3.10 Industry expectations of impact of<br />

social change and globalisation<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

Next generation<br />

Ag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

English language<br />

Increased demands<br />

Labour market<br />

Higher educational<br />

EU enlargement<br />

Figure 3.12 Regional press reach by age<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

World trade<br />

15-24<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45-54<br />

55-64<br />

65+<br />

High speed networks<br />

Eurozone<br />

Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Source Pira Survey<br />

• Positive • Negative • Neutral<br />

Figure 3.13 Book buy<strong>in</strong>g propensity by<br />

age group<br />

• Age profile of book buyers • Age profile of population<br />

20<br />

Figure 3.11 Reach of national<br />

newspapers by age<br />

15<br />

80<br />

70<br />

10<br />

60<br />

50<br />

5<br />

40<br />

30<br />

24 and<br />

under<br />

25-34<br />

35-44<br />

45-54<br />

55-64<br />

65+<br />

20<br />

Source Book Market<strong>in</strong>g Ltd<br />

10<br />

15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54<br />

Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />

55-64<br />

65+<br />

16


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

companies to develop cross-platform<br />

strategies and to escape from rigid crossmedia<br />

ownership constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a Henley Centre study<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association, on how book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g is far<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation to o<strong>the</strong>r media,<br />

while time spent on media <strong>in</strong> total is not ris<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>the</strong> percentage of total time spent read<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g apportioned differently, with <strong>the</strong> share of<br />

books ris<strong>in</strong>g (up from 44% <strong>in</strong> 1988 to 52% <strong>in</strong><br />

2000) and <strong>the</strong> share of newspapers (down from<br />

44% to 32%) fall<strong>in</strong>g. Magaz<strong>in</strong>es’ share rose<br />

from 1988 to 1998 (13% to 22%) but has s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

fallen to 16%.<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>in</strong> contrast with Mediaphile, <strong>the</strong><br />

Henley Centre also found that <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />

time spent read<strong>in</strong>g has risen relative to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

leisure activities, while time spent listen<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

view<strong>in</strong>g has fallen, albeit slightly. The sharpest<br />

rise, unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion of time<br />

spent ‘<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g’.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> questions asked <strong>in</strong> our survey of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry companies (see Appendices for<br />

methodology and text of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire)<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> impact of various k<strong>in</strong>ds of social<br />

changes on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The results suggest<br />

that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased demands on consumers’<br />

time constitutes <strong>the</strong> most negatively perceived<br />

aspect of anticipated social changes (see<br />

Figure 3.10). It is also important to note that this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation refers only to consumer media<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g and use, not to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess area.<br />

3.5 Demographic changes<br />

The age profile of <strong>the</strong> population has major<br />

implications for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The<br />

current trend towards <strong>the</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

population is ma<strong>in</strong>ly seen as positive or neutral,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to our questionnaire.<br />

This is backed up by research which shows<br />

that, for books and newspapers at any rate, <strong>the</strong><br />

usage is skewed towards older age groups.<br />

This would imply a positive outlook for those<br />

sectors because of <strong>the</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> population.<br />

However, unless this pattern is reproduced as<br />

generations mature, it is obvious that publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies will eventually be <strong>in</strong> difficulty.<br />

Because newspapers have actually<br />

experienced decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g circulations – not just <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> UK, but across <strong>the</strong> advanced countries –<br />

Table 3.1 Newspaper readership<br />

profiles by age<br />

Age<br />

group National Regional<br />

15-24 13.5 13.9<br />

25-34 17.4 18.1<br />

35-44 17.8 18.4<br />

45-54 17.5 16.6<br />

55-64 13.5 13.1<br />

65+ 20.2 19.8<br />

Source BMRB Target Group Index (TGI) 2001<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have tended to be more concerned about<br />

this issue than o<strong>the</strong>r segments. The Newspaper<br />

Society carried out some research with BMRB<br />

<strong>in</strong>to media use by lifestage, which shows very<br />

clearly how <strong>the</strong> different stages of life, e.g. ‘live<br />

with parents’, ‘live with partner’, ‘children left<br />

home’, affect <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of media that is used and<br />

how <strong>in</strong>tensively. This lifestage analysis is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly more useful than simple age<br />

breakdowns, now that family formation occurs<br />

at very vary<strong>in</strong>g ages, and second families are<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g more common.<br />

A particular problem faces national<br />

newspapers <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y have a limited number<br />

of brands at <strong>the</strong>ir disposal and <strong>the</strong>se brands<br />

tend to become identified with particular age<br />

cohorts, with well-known examples be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Daily Express and <strong>the</strong> Daily Telegraph.<br />

Theoretically <strong>in</strong>teractive media present great<br />

opportunities for publish<strong>in</strong>g companies to break<br />

free of <strong>the</strong> format and brand constra<strong>in</strong>ts that can<br />

prevent <strong>the</strong>m appeal<strong>in</strong>g to new generations of<br />

customers. In practice, it has been difficult so far<br />

to deploy <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> offl<strong>in</strong>e brand to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e one at <strong>the</strong> same time as<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g enough flexibility <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e brand to<br />

allow it to play <strong>the</strong> desired role of a new,<br />

differentiat<strong>in</strong>g identity. Closely related to this is<br />

<strong>the</strong> issue of monetis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e manifestation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> brand, apart from by driv<strong>in</strong>g sales or ><br />

17


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

defend<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted version.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t environment, some of our<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewees argued that <strong>the</strong> Metro free dailies<br />

<strong>in</strong> a number of UK cities have a greater appeal<br />

to young people who do not normally read a<br />

paper, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g perhaps that digital media<br />

are not <strong>the</strong> only vehicles for tackl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

generation divide.<br />

Although book publishers have enjoyed ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sales, <strong>the</strong>y too are concerned that younger age<br />

groups may be los<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g habit. More<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated research on read<strong>in</strong>g habits and<br />

motivations across <strong>the</strong> different sectors might<br />

produce results that would be illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

all of <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

3.6 O<strong>the</strong>r factors affect<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

3.6.1 Internet connectivity<br />

Figures 3.14, 3.15 and 3.16 show contrast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scenario-based forecasts for Internet<br />

connectivity.<br />

Slow<strong>in</strong>g proliferation of Internet connectivity<br />

Take up of <strong>the</strong> Internet at home is an important<br />

factor driv<strong>in</strong>g and reflect<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong><br />

consumer lifestyles. Data for Figure 3.14 is<br />

taken from The Office of National Statistics’<br />

quarterly survey of households access<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet from <strong>the</strong>ir home computer. Over <strong>the</strong> last<br />

year, <strong>the</strong> rapid quarter-on-quarter <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

previously seen have tailed off.<br />

The fitted curve cont<strong>in</strong>ues this slow<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

household penetration cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> next<br />

two years, with <strong>the</strong> total barely ris<strong>in</strong>g above<br />

40%. Predictions are shown for part years to<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> fit of <strong>the</strong> forecast with actual data.<br />

Although low by some alternative forecasts,<br />

currently only 45% of UK households possess<br />

a computer, so <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al figure for Internet<br />

access still represents over 90% of potential.<br />

This forecast is most likely to be true when:<br />

• <strong>the</strong> digital divide cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

• PC sales cont<strong>in</strong>ue to stall<br />

• broadband availability is limited.<br />

■ The network<strong>in</strong>g of UK society has been slow<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> US (<strong>the</strong> ‘Atlantic’ divide) and<br />

much slower <strong>in</strong> lower <strong>in</strong>come groups<br />

compared to households higher up <strong>the</strong> social<br />

scale (<strong>the</strong> digital divide). The networked<br />

society scenario is <strong>the</strong>refore more likely to<br />

occur if <strong>the</strong> divides are dim<strong>in</strong>ished over <strong>the</strong><br />

next two to three years.<br />

■ Figure 3.15 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of UK<br />

households access<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Internet for different<br />

<strong>in</strong>come groups <strong>in</strong> 2000 and 2001 (Source:<br />

Family Expenditure Survey). For reference<br />

purposes <strong>the</strong> relatively even penetration of<br />

telephone use across <strong>in</strong>come groups is also<br />

shown. Income decile 1 is <strong>the</strong> poorest 10% of<br />

households and so on up to <strong>the</strong> richest 10%.<br />

■ In <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>in</strong>come groups, 75% of<br />

households can access <strong>the</strong> Internet from<br />

home. If households from all <strong>in</strong>come groups<br />

could do <strong>the</strong> same, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> networked<br />

society would be that much closer.<br />

■ In 2001, decile 8 achieved <strong>the</strong> penetration<br />

rate achieved by decile 10 <strong>in</strong> 2000, decile 7<br />

achieved <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>in</strong> 2001 set by decile 9 <strong>in</strong><br />

2000 and so on. Each year, each decile<br />

achieves roughly <strong>the</strong> same level of<br />

penetration of <strong>the</strong> decile two places higher<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous year.<br />

■ Suppos<strong>in</strong>g up-take of <strong>the</strong> Internet has already<br />

reached maturity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top decile and<br />

historical trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue we would have:<br />

• 57% penetration by end 2003<br />

• 65% penetration by end 2004<br />

• 71% penetration by end 2005<br />

Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Atlantic gap<br />

Figure 3.16 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of UK and<br />

US households able to access <strong>the</strong> Internet from<br />

home. The US data (US Onl<strong>in</strong>e, US Census<br />

Bureau) is much more sporadic than <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

data, but typically <strong>the</strong> penetration rates<br />

achieved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US are 18-24 months ahead<br />

of <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> historical trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong>n home<br />

Internet access would reach 53% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

by 2003, 50% higher than its mid-2001 figure.<br />

To sum up, <strong>the</strong> short history of <strong>the</strong> technology<br />

makes home Internet use difficult to forecast. If<br />

current trends cont<strong>in</strong>ue, <strong>the</strong>n Internet access at<br />

18


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 3.14 Onl<strong>in</strong>e households forecast<br />

Figure 3.16 Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Atlantic gap<br />

50%, UK households onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Predicted<br />

60%, Households onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• UK • US<br />

40<br />

50<br />

30<br />

40<br />

20<br />

30<br />

10<br />

20<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

10<br />

Source Pira, based on ONS data<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Figure 3.15 Clos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> digital gap<br />

• Telephone 2001 • Internet 2001 • Internet 2000<br />

100%, Households<br />

Sources ONS, US Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Census<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Income decile<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Source Family Expenditure Survey<br />

><br />

19


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

home is likely to settle at penetration rates of<br />

40-50% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next two years. If, though, <strong>the</strong><br />

digital divide is reduced, penetration rates could<br />

be much higher – 70 to 80%.<br />

3.6.2 Reduc<strong>in</strong>g wastage<br />

Wastage is a major problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> newspaper,<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publish<strong>in</strong>g sectors. The<br />

drive to reduce waste is prompted both by <strong>the</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial costs to <strong>the</strong> publisher and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

environmental cost to society as a whole.<br />

Targets have already been agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />

newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry, and <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

has been <strong>the</strong> focus of a major report and a<br />

series of subsequent <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The<br />

newspaper and magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers and supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> organisations meet toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Industry Group (JIG) and <strong>the</strong>re are also a<br />

number of separate <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The sections<br />

deal<strong>in</strong>g with books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Part 1<br />

give more <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> levels of returns<br />

and wastage.<br />

Although we discuss wastage essentially from<br />

<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of view of its impact on<br />

competitiveness, it is clear that <strong>the</strong> measures<br />

we outl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report to improve<br />

<strong>the</strong> efficiency of <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

alternative routes to reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> customer<br />

will also have environmental benefits.<br />

20


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

4<br />

Size and performance of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

4.1 Turnover<br />

Figures 4.1 and 4.2 show <strong>the</strong> turnover of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> official def<strong>in</strong>ition, SIC<br />

22.1 (revised 1992). Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABI mean<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are two overlapp<strong>in</strong>g sets of data that are<br />

not strictly comparable with each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Research by ONS <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> post-1997<br />

data collection is more reliable than pre-1997.<br />

Both are given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.2 to show as much of<br />

a trend as possible. This shows a picture of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed and rapid growth apart from a slight<br />

dip <strong>in</strong> 1997. Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two runs of data<br />

separately, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry grew by an annual<br />

average rate of 7.4% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1993-97 and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n slowed to an annual average of just under<br />

4.8% over <strong>the</strong> period 1995-99.<br />

An alternative set of data, shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4.1,<br />

drawn from unofficial sources, yielded a higher<br />

turnover figure for 1999 of £18.5bn, which has<br />

tended to become <strong>the</strong> most widely quoted figure<br />

for <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Table 4.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> turnover, based on<br />

unofficial statistics, 1999, £m<br />

Newspapers 7797<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es 6211<br />

Books and journals 4476<br />

Total 18,484<br />

Sources The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association, Publishers’ Association,<br />

Periodical Publishers’ Association<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>se data sets is ideal. The official<br />

data has <strong>the</strong> merit of provid<strong>in</strong>g a relatively long<br />

run of data from a s<strong>in</strong>gle source, and be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

comparable with <strong>in</strong>ternational data (see section<br />

on <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons, below). The ABI<br />

gives a total for journals and periodicals <strong>in</strong> 1999<br />

of £6.153bn, which appears to under-represent<br />

<strong>the</strong> revenue from magaz<strong>in</strong>es, particularly<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g activities, which<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r evidence suggests have been among <strong>the</strong><br />

fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g areas of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Data on<br />

journals is particularly difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> anyway,<br />

so it is impossible to say what <strong>the</strong> figure for<br />

‘periodicals’ alone might be (see Gap Analysis).<br />

The unofficial data – at least as represented <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> constituent elements of <strong>the</strong> £18.5bn figure –<br />

over-represents <strong>the</strong> revenue from newspapers<br />

by us<strong>in</strong>g total expenditure ra<strong>the</strong>r than net<br />

revenue (i.e. gross of advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

distribution expenses which accrue to o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

elements of <strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>). For bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, no net revenue figures are<br />

available.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.3 is <strong>the</strong> sum of net<br />

revenues for newspapers, conventional (i.e. not<br />

contract or customer magaz<strong>in</strong>es) consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and sales of books (<strong>in</strong>voiced at<br />

warehouse prices). Add<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> revenues from<br />

customer magaz<strong>in</strong>es of £227m <strong>in</strong> 1999 and<br />

£10.78bn of revenue from bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

activities (drawn from <strong>the</strong> special study<br />

Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, which excludes some<br />

categories such as bus<strong>in</strong>ess TV and credit<br />

reference agencies) gives a total turnover of<br />

£22.33bn. Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong> B2B data is from a<br />

one-off study. This means that <strong>the</strong> best we can<br />

do is arrive at a number of <strong>in</strong>conclusive ‘sizes’<br />

for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. What <strong>the</strong>se different data have<br />

<strong>in</strong> common, however, is that <strong>the</strong>y all depict very<br />

healthy growth.<br />

4.1.1 Revenues from licens<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

rights sales<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> most serious gaps <strong>in</strong> data is<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> revenues publishers derive<br />

from <strong>the</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g and sale of rights (see Table<br />

4.2). Clearly, this is ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of book<br />

and journal publish<strong>in</strong>g, but magaz<strong>in</strong>e companies<br />

also engage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sale and purchase of<br />

formats, often <strong>in</strong>ternationally, and license <strong>the</strong><br />

use of <strong>the</strong>ir brands. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

companies also license <strong>in</strong>formation to third<br />

parties for redistribution. Some of this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public doma<strong>in</strong> from annual<br />

reports. A separate research exercise simply on<br />

this topic would be worthwhile, though it might<br />

reveal an unwill<strong>in</strong>gness to divulge <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> opportunities for publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future is likely to be <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir core assets across many more platforms<br />

and channels, not all of which will be under <strong>the</strong><br />

direct control of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies.<br />

Therefore, hav<strong>in</strong>g data on this area will be<br />

vital to understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> total picture.<br />

22


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 4.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> turnover, SIC 22.1<br />

Figure 4.3 Net revenues – three sub-sectors<br />

20000, £m<br />

12000, £m<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

10000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

5000<br />

2000<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />

(data for 2000 provisional)<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association, PA<br />

Figure 4.2 Trend turnover data from ABI, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data discont<strong>in</strong>uity<br />

20000, £m<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry (data for<br />

2000 provisional)<br />

Table 4.2 Royalties, publish<strong>in</strong>g, 1999, £m<br />

Exports 376<br />

Imports 168<br />

Balance 208<br />

Source UK Trade <strong>in</strong> Services<br />

><br />

23


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

4.2 Costs and resources<br />

There is little data available on costs for<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g as a whole, but <strong>the</strong> Annual<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry gives a figure for total<br />

employment costs (Tables 4.3 and Figure 4.4).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce employment data is unavailable before<br />

1998, it is only possible to show gross valueadded<br />

per employee for three years (Figure<br />

4.5). It appears to have grown rapidly – GVA per<br />

employee <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g grew by 13.9% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period, for example.<br />

More detailed data on purchases of goods<br />

and services is only available up to 1999, with<br />

<strong>the</strong> break <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> series <strong>in</strong> 1997, so two numbers<br />

are given for that year <strong>in</strong> Table 4.4. This<br />

appears to show a fairly steep rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> total<br />

purchases of goods and materials from 1993 to<br />

1997, and a slow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>reafter. This is very<br />

much <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> subsequent chart on paper<br />

prices, show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sharp rise <strong>in</strong> that period.<br />

The rise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> figure for telecommunications<br />

services and computer and related services is<br />

more likely to reflect a more extensive use of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se services, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a rise <strong>in</strong> prices.<br />

4.2.1 Paper prices<br />

Figure 4.6 illustrates <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> paper prices<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce 1987, show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> volatility, <strong>the</strong> sharp rise<br />

<strong>in</strong> newspr<strong>in</strong>t prices <strong>in</strong> 2001 and <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

fall <strong>in</strong> 2002.<br />

There is still concern, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry, about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

concentration of paper supply and a fear that<br />

<strong>in</strong>appropriate action to support European<br />

producers would make <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

more vulnerable to price rises. The suppliers<br />

have already declared <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>tention to try to<br />

limit price volatility <strong>in</strong> future by controll<strong>in</strong>g supply<br />

more effectively.<br />

Table 4.3 Employment, employment costs<br />

and gross value-added<br />

Turnover, Gross value- Employment Employment<br />

basic £m added, basic 000s cosfs<br />

prices, £m<br />

1995 14059 6425 n.a. 2742<br />

1996 15108 6316 n.a. 2929<br />

1997 15053 6421 n.a. 3338<br />

1998 16106 7147 173 3623<br />

1999 16849 7790 163 3798<br />

2000 18371 8409 164 4254<br />

Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />

Table 4.4 Purchases of goods, materials<br />

and services<br />

Total purchases Purchases of Purchases of Purchases of<br />

of goods, telecoms computer advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

materials and services and related and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

services services services<br />

£m £m £m £m<br />

1993 5940.9 – – –<br />

1994 6225.3 – – –<br />

1995 7302.0 – – –<br />

1996 8226.1 97.6 65.4 576.9<br />

1997 8799.7 111.5 79.0 657.1<br />

1997 8564 105 75 675<br />

1998 9021 110 91 707<br />

1999 9104 117 98 695<br />

24


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 4.4 Gross value-added and<br />

employment costs<br />

10000<br />

• Gross value added • Employment costs<br />

Figure 4.6 Trends <strong>in</strong> publication paper pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1000, euro per ton<br />

• Newspr<strong>in</strong>t • SC • LWC<br />

8000<br />

800<br />

6000<br />

600<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

1987<br />

1989<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001E 2002E<br />

Source Merrill Lynch<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Note: LWC = Light weight coated; SC = Super calendared<br />

Source ONS ABI<br />

Figure 4.5 Gross value-added per employee<br />

150, 1998 = 100<br />

Figure 4.7 Newspr<strong>in</strong>t capacity and demand<br />

50<br />

• Capacity • Demand<br />

120<br />

40<br />

90<br />

30<br />

60<br />

20<br />

30<br />

10<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Europe<br />

N America<br />

Asia<br />

World<br />

Source ONS ABI<br />

Source World Press Trends<br />

><br />

25


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

4.3 Cross <strong>in</strong>dustry comparison<br />

In assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry it is useful to have<br />

comparisons across sectors, but f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful comparators is not straightforward,<br />

especially for a sector such as publish<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />

straddles <strong>the</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g/service divide. The<br />

OECD makes a useful division between<br />

Information and Communications Technology<br />

(ICT)-produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries and ICT-us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries, classify<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong><br />

latter group. For <strong>the</strong> comparators we have<br />

chosen sub-sectors mostly from <strong>the</strong> ICT-us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries, with telecommunications from <strong>the</strong><br />

ICT-producers.<br />

Figures 4.8 and 4.9 summarise data from <strong>the</strong><br />

Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry and place publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

its context. There are many more enterprises <strong>in</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g compared to publish<strong>in</strong>g, which has seen<br />

a growth <strong>in</strong> enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s alongside<br />

<strong>the</strong> growth seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The largest rate of growth –<br />

although from <strong>the</strong> smallest base – is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

record<strong>in</strong>g media sub-sector.<br />

Employment has been broadly stable <strong>in</strong> all<br />

five <strong>in</strong>dustries, aga<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> exception of<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g media where <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

employees rose by 50% between 1998 and<br />

2000. Value-added is highest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

telecommunications <strong>in</strong>dustry, which has seen<br />

sharp rises <strong>in</strong> productivity dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s.<br />

The rise <strong>in</strong> value-added <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g is more<br />

modest and broadly matches that seen <strong>in</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Comparative data on measures of<br />

entrepreneurship are hard to f<strong>in</strong>d for any<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries. The UK competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

use figures from <strong>the</strong> Annual Respondents’<br />

Database (ARD), but measures for sub-sectors<br />

are only available at relatively high levels of<br />

aggregation. Figure 4.10 illustrates this, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

entry and exit rates per year for a number of<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries 1 . <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is<br />

amalgamated with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> pulp<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> sector 22. As far as we can tell,<br />

this sector is fairly representative of UK<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, with perhaps a slightly higher<br />

than average rate of entry.<br />

Entry and exit rates are used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Competitiveness Indicators as a marker of<br />

entrepreneurship, on <strong>the</strong> basis that high levels<br />

should <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple improve resource allocation.<br />

However, high entry rates are not always a<br />

good sign of entrepreneurship; bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

growth rates and <strong>in</strong>novation also need to be<br />

taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />

1 The <strong>in</strong>formation is from Entry, Exit and Establishment<br />

Survival <strong>in</strong> UK Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by Richard Disney, Jonathan<br />

Haskel and Ylva Heden<br />

26


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 4.8 Number of enterprises,<br />

five <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

Figure 4.10 Entry and exit rates <strong>in</strong> seven<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

25000<br />

Telecommunications • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> •<br />

• Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Reproduction of recorded media<br />

0.4<br />

• Entry rate • Exit rate<br />

20000<br />

0.3<br />

15000<br />

0.2<br />

10000<br />

0.1<br />

5000<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000<br />

Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />

Figure 4.9 Value-added, five <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

Chemical<br />

Mechanical eng.<br />

Computers<br />

Electrical eng<br />

Instrumental<br />

Food, tobacco dr<strong>in</strong>k<br />

Textile<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g/publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Source Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival <strong>in</strong> UK Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

Richard Disney, Jonathan Haskel and Ylva Heden<br />

ALL<br />

20000<br />

Telecommunications • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> • Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g •<br />

recorded media<br />

Reproduction of<br />

16000<br />

12000<br />

8000<br />

4000<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Source Office of National Statistics, Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry<br />

><br />

27


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

4.4 International comparisons of<br />

productivity and <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

We have noted already <strong>the</strong> scepticism with<br />

which <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons should be<br />

treated. Figure 4.11 shows productivity <strong>in</strong>dices<br />

for publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> five countries dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s,<br />

based on data from <strong>the</strong> OECD, as compiled by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gron<strong>in</strong>gen Growth and Development Centre<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. Productivity is measured <strong>in</strong><br />

value added (1995 prices) per worker,<br />

unadjusted for hours worked. In addition <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

employment figure excludes <strong>the</strong> self-employed.<br />

For all countries <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex is set to 100 <strong>in</strong> 1990,<br />

except for Germany (1991).<br />

The pattern of change <strong>in</strong> productivity across<br />

<strong>the</strong>se five countries is at variance with <strong>the</strong><br />

standard picture of economy-wide productivity<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s. The US shows <strong>the</strong><br />

weakest productivity growth with <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

rates of growth <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ental Europe. The UK<br />

lies somewhere <strong>in</strong> between, show<strong>in</strong>g gentle<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> productivity. O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries covered<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gron<strong>in</strong>gen <strong>in</strong>dices exhibit a more similar<br />

pattern to <strong>the</strong> standard one, so it would appear<br />

that <strong>the</strong> performance of publish<strong>in</strong>g is, <strong>in</strong> fact, at<br />

variance with <strong>the</strong> overall <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

productivity picture. There are some possible<br />

explanations: US companies suffered from <strong>the</strong><br />

strong dollar <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> 1990s,<br />

while conversely, Eurozone countries benefited<br />

from <strong>the</strong> weaken<strong>in</strong>g Euro. With its strengths <strong>in</strong><br />

scientific publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands has<br />

particularly benefited from <strong>the</strong> strong dollar, as<br />

has <strong>the</strong> German publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. There is<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r evidence from <strong>the</strong> Newspaper Association<br />

of America that <strong>the</strong>re was a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong> productivity <strong>in</strong> that part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. We<br />

have also been told <strong>in</strong> a number of <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

that <strong>the</strong> diffusion of new technology and more<br />

efficient work<strong>in</strong>g practices has perhaps not gone<br />

as far with<strong>in</strong> US newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g as might<br />

be expected, and not as far as it has <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

It must be emphasised that this graph depicts<br />

growth trends, not absolute levels of<br />

productivity. Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons<br />

for sub-sectors of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry are made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

relevant sections of <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

Reliable figures for comparisons of <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

are even harder to f<strong>in</strong>d. The UK<br />

competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators uses data from <strong>the</strong><br />

second Community Innovation Survey (CIS)<br />

(Figure 4.12), but at <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry this<br />

source becomes quite unreliable. ‘<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’ is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and wood pulp and only<br />

133 firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />

It is also quite dated (from 1996-97 – although<br />

CIS 3 is currently under preparation) and so its<br />

relevance to 2002 must be taken with a p<strong>in</strong>ch of<br />

salt. The figure below shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of<br />

firms <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dustry stat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced a new or improved product with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

last year. The percentage of UK firms <strong>in</strong> this<br />

category is above <strong>the</strong> average for <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Union (plus Norway) as a whole, but below <strong>the</strong><br />

figures for Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands.<br />

Figure 4.13 illustrates <strong>the</strong> positive trade<br />

balance <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter, which is <strong>the</strong> nearest<br />

available data to publish<strong>in</strong>g. The data is <strong>in</strong><br />

dollars – <strong>in</strong> national currency terms <strong>the</strong> picture<br />

for Germany and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands would look<br />

much better. Naturally this is not an ideal<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition, and it also should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />

UK publishers have made <strong>the</strong> decision to pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

a great deal of material abroad both for cost<br />

reasons and to facilitate access to third markets.<br />

28


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 4.11 International comparisons of<br />

productivity growth <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

• Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands • US • UK • Germany • France<br />

1991 1993 1995 1997<br />

Source Gron<strong>in</strong>gen Growth and Development Centre<br />

1999<br />

Figure 4.12 Product and process <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Wood pulp and paper; publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation<br />

• Computer and related activities;<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g services<br />

4.5 Conclusion<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> very considerable difficulties and<br />

dangers of draw<strong>in</strong>g conclusions based on <strong>the</strong><br />

evidence available, it is possible to make some<br />

general statements. In terms of value-added<br />

and productivity, <strong>the</strong> data does not seem greatly<br />

at variance with o<strong>the</strong>r UK <strong>in</strong>dustries, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> conclusion that publish<strong>in</strong>g is likely to occupy<br />

<strong>the</strong> same sort of <strong>in</strong>ternational rank<strong>in</strong>g as UK<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole i.e. beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> US and <strong>the</strong><br />

more advanced cont<strong>in</strong>ental European countries.<br />

But as <strong>the</strong> (official) def<strong>in</strong>ition of publish<strong>in</strong>g used<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se comparisons excludes at least some of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g and most <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

segments of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> true picture might<br />

be somewhat more positive.<br />

In terms of broader measures of performance,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g product and service <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />

diversity, we conclude that <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top rank <strong>in</strong>ternationally, a<br />

conclusion broadly supported by an EU<br />

Commission report which will be drawn on <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sections consider<strong>in</strong>g sub-sectors, below.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections look at <strong>the</strong> major<br />

sectors of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. It does not<br />

analyse every <strong>in</strong>dicator, but draws out <strong>the</strong> most<br />

significant elements.<br />

0<br />

Germany<br />

France<br />

Ireland<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Source Community Innovations Survey<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden<br />

UK<br />

Total<br />

Figure 4.13 Trade balance <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted matter<br />

2500, $<br />

• US • UK • Germany • Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands • S<strong>in</strong>gapore<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Source United Nations<br />

29


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

5<br />

Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

5.1 Revenues<br />

Figure 5.1 shows publishers’ total book sales,<br />

home and export, at ex-warehouse prices,<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association survey<br />

and also on data from <strong>the</strong> ONS Prodcom series,<br />

which arrive at similar figures via different<br />

methodologies. Major revisions to <strong>the</strong> Prodcom<br />

series have led us to use <strong>the</strong> latest run of data<br />

(1997-2000) only. The PA figures carry us only<br />

to 1999 at present, although <strong>the</strong> organisation is<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process of chang<strong>in</strong>g to a more frequent<br />

series based on distributors’ <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

The grow<strong>in</strong>g importance of <strong>the</strong> Internet as a<br />

channel for sell<strong>in</strong>g books is clearly seen <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 5.2, and it seems to be widely felt that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet is grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

simply tak<strong>in</strong>g share from <strong>the</strong> traditional channel.<br />

To date, though, <strong>the</strong>re is no firm support for this<br />

conclusion.<br />

5.2 Export performance<br />

Figures 5.3 to 5.5 show <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> home and<br />

export sales; <strong>the</strong> performance by category and<br />

<strong>the</strong> trade balance. However, as discussed<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on expand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

markets, below, <strong>the</strong> major difficulty <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g this data is <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

globalisation of <strong>the</strong> book publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

More and more books are now produced under<br />

licence or directly by subsidiaries <strong>in</strong> third<br />

markets ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g exported directly<br />

from <strong>the</strong> UK, but this data is available to <strong>the</strong><br />

publishers, who treat <strong>the</strong> revenue <strong>in</strong> various<br />

ways <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir accounts, and is not captured <strong>in</strong><br />

a publicly available form. The charts might be<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpreted to suggest that <strong>the</strong>re is some cause<br />

for concern <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> trade performance. In fact,<br />

this cannot be implied reliably, but never<strong>the</strong>less<br />

<strong>the</strong> period of decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trade balance (post-<br />

1996) does co<strong>in</strong>cide closely with <strong>the</strong> era of<br />

<strong>the</strong> strong pound.<br />

5.3 Titles<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.6 shows that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

has greatly expanded <strong>the</strong> number of titles it<br />

produces across all categories. In one sense<br />

this is a great strength and a tribute to<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation and creativity. But <strong>the</strong> downside is<br />

that many of <strong>the</strong>se titles are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be sold<br />

unprofitably or not at all. They will be a cost<br />

through <strong>the</strong> returns process, and f<strong>in</strong>ish up be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pulped, which represents an additional f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

and environmental cost. The book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess historically concentrated on push<strong>in</strong>g<br />

product out <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> and has taken<br />

less account than it should of whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> books<br />

will sell. Typically 20% of a publisher’s titles will<br />

account for 80% of <strong>the</strong> revenues. Publishers<br />

seem divided over whe<strong>the</strong>r this is simply an<br />

<strong>in</strong>evitable consequence of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess –<br />

forecast<strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r a particular title will sell is,<br />

after all, not like forecast<strong>in</strong>g demand for nappies<br />

or baked beans – or someth<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

publishers should be actively try<strong>in</strong>g to change.<br />

Book publish<strong>in</strong>g, especially on <strong>the</strong> fiction side,<br />

resembles <strong>the</strong> music and film bus<strong>in</strong>ess, where<br />

a few hits will be balanced by a large number of<br />

failures. However, <strong>the</strong> odds can be shifted to<br />

some extent by research <strong>in</strong>to know<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

customer better. There is much better data<br />

available now both through <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of surveys<br />

carried out by Book Market<strong>in</strong>g and also through<br />

Whitakers BookTrack, for example. Some<br />

publishers seem able to make better use of<br />

this than o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> tailor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir offer<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />

<strong>the</strong> market.<br />

Book publish<strong>in</strong>g is quite fragmented, but with<br />

a small number of publishers and titles<br />

account<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> majority of sales. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to a special report by KPMG <strong>in</strong> 1998, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong>, 3% of titles<br />

accounted for 50% of <strong>the</strong> volume of retail sales.<br />

Fewer than 40 out of 15,000 publishers<br />

accounted for 56% of bookshop sales. But no<br />

one publisher had a market share of more than<br />

9%. Book retail<strong>in</strong>g is also fragmented, but<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated by four cha<strong>in</strong>s, which toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

accounted for 42% of retail sales. Aga<strong>in</strong>,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to KPMG, <strong>the</strong> cost of distribution<br />

to publishers was extremely high, at 13% of<br />

sales, compared with an average 6% <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry overall.<br />

Figure 5.7 shows <strong>the</strong> percentage of returns <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> market. Unfortunately, this figure is not<br />

30


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 5.1 Total book sales, home and export,<br />

£m, ex-warehouse prices<br />

3500<br />

Figure 5.2 UK book sales, retail value, £m<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

• Traditional channels • Internet<br />

• Total sales • Sales (Prodcom) 500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

1985 1987 1989<br />

Source Mediaphile 2010<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

1990 1992 1994 1996<br />

Sources The Publishers’ Association, ONS<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Figure 5.3 UK sales: home and export<br />

Figure 5.5 Exports as a percentage of sales<br />

60%<br />

Total exports, % of sales •<br />

• School and ELT exports, % of sales •<br />

Academic/prof. exports, % of sales<br />

Consumer exports, % of sales<br />

2500, £m<br />

2000<br />

• Total, home • Total, export<br />

50<br />

1500<br />

40<br />

30<br />

1000<br />

20<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

10<br />

Source PA<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Figure 5.4 Trade balance <strong>in</strong> books<br />

Source PA<br />

600, £m<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Source ONS<br />

31


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 5.6 Titles published<br />

120000<br />

100000<br />

80000<br />

102102<br />

98477<br />

102925<br />

108744<br />

Figure 5.8 Trends <strong>in</strong> book prices<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

• ONS PPI (1990 = 100) • ONS PPI (1990 = 100), relative to RPI<br />

60000<br />

120<br />

40000<br />

110<br />

20000<br />

100<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Source J Whitaker<br />

Source ONS<br />

Figure 5.7 Returns as % of net sales<br />

Consumer<br />

150<br />

140<br />

Average books prices (1990 = 100); unit prices (Bookseller)<br />

• RPI (1990 = 100)<br />

School and ELT<br />

Academic and professional<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

Total<br />

100<br />

0% 3 6 9 12 15<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Source PA<br />

Sources The Bookseller, ONS<br />

Figure 5.9 Employment<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

1994 1996 1998 2000<br />

Source Labour Force Survey (data for spr<strong>in</strong>g of each year)<br />

32


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 5.1 F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial data 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99<br />

Profit as % sales 6.8 8.3 8.3<br />

Profit as % total assets 11.4 10 9.7<br />

Profit as % of<br />

capital employed 25.2 24 20.1<br />

Pay per employee 20,363 21,059 22,492<br />

Sales per employee 124,000 124,000 129,000<br />

Capital employed<br />

per employee 46,000 51,000 53,000<br />

Pay to sales ratio 17.60 17.20 17.60<br />

Source ICC, based on returns from 113 companies<br />

Table 5.2 Regional distribution of employment, book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g and total publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

All <strong>in</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g by region; not seasonally adjusted;<br />

UK, spr<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />

22.1 22.11: % of total % of total<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g book <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong> each<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g region: region<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 194780 36401 100.0 100.0<br />

Tyne & Wear 3801 453 2.0 1.24<br />

Rest of North East 440 0 0.2 0<br />

Greater Manchester 1978 0 1.01 0<br />

Merseyside 853 0 0.43 0<br />

Rest of North West 5256 1892 2.7 5.20<br />

South Yorkshire 1789 0 0.9 0<br />

West Yorkshire 4131 437 2.1 1.2<br />

Rest of Yorkshire &<br />

Humberside 2533 0 1.3 0<br />

East Midlands 8926 1822 4.58 5.01<br />

West Midlands<br />

Metropolitan County 6183 580 3.17 1.59<br />

Rest of West Midlands 4718 0 2.42 0<br />

East of England 24019 4216 12.33 11.58<br />

Inner London 31107 6659 15.97 18.29<br />

Outer London 29108 6735 14.94 18.50<br />

South East 34201 9826 17.56 27.0<br />

South West 13013 2000 6.68 5.49<br />

Wales 3947 536 2.03 1.47<br />

Strathclyde 5783 852 2.97 2.34<br />

Rest of Scotland 8578 393 4.40 1.08<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 4416 0 2.27 0<br />

Source Labour Force Survey<br />

available on a regular basis, so it is hard to say<br />

what <strong>the</strong> trend is, but no-one suggested to us<br />

that it was fall<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>y po<strong>in</strong>ted out that<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK returns rate is actually a lot better than<br />

<strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>ternational markets, notably <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

But it is widely agreed that it needs to come<br />

down, and that even at <strong>the</strong> current rate, costs<br />

can be removed from <strong>the</strong> returns process<br />

through automation – this is underway through<br />

<strong>the</strong> Book Industry Communication (BIC) returns<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative. Some publishers would like to see <strong>the</strong><br />

cha<strong>in</strong> move to firm sale on backlist, which is<br />

now <strong>in</strong> operation <strong>in</strong> Australia.<br />

5.4 Prices<br />

There are many different book price <strong>in</strong>dices<br />

available, but accord<strong>in</strong>g to Book Market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />

most accurate measure is <strong>the</strong> PPI produced by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Office of National Statistics, as this uses a<br />

methodology that measures changes <strong>in</strong> a<br />

sample of products that are as nearly identical<br />

as possible. The trend <strong>in</strong> this is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />

5.8, nom<strong>in</strong>ally and relative to <strong>the</strong> Retail Price<br />

Index. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that book prices (across all<br />

categories) have <strong>in</strong>creased slightly faster than<br />

<strong>the</strong> RPI. Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> Bookseller <strong>in</strong>dices,<br />

which measure <strong>the</strong> average cover prices ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than <strong>the</strong> prices reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> books actually<br />

sold, gives a slightly different picture, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that while book prices outstripped <strong>the</strong> RPI quite<br />

considerably over <strong>the</strong> period 1981 to 1999, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

rose slightly slower than <strong>the</strong> RPI <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period<br />

1990-1999. Overall, 49% of books were sold at<br />

discount <strong>in</strong> 1999, up from 41% <strong>in</strong> 1997.<br />

5.5 Profitability<br />

See Table 5.1.<br />

5.6 Employment, skills and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

The variability of data on employment from <strong>the</strong><br />

Labour Force Survey has already been<br />

mentioned as ma<strong>in</strong>ly an artefact of <strong>the</strong> small<br />

sample size. There are no <strong>in</strong>dustry data<br />

collected on employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector. The high<br />

number of staff employed on a non-standard<br />

basis (freelancers, etc) is a complicat<strong>in</strong>g factor<br />

<strong>in</strong> any attempt to arrive at a figure and it ><br />

33


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

makes attempts to calculate output or revenue<br />

per employee across <strong>the</strong> sector next to<br />

impossible. Some <strong>in</strong>dividual companies told us<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y do measure this, or use <strong>in</strong>dications<br />

such as titles produced per employee. The data<br />

from <strong>the</strong> ICC survey on sales per employee<br />

may reflect only <strong>the</strong> full-time employees for <strong>the</strong><br />

companies concerned, which are <strong>in</strong> any case<br />

<strong>the</strong> largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector. They do show a<br />

significant rise <strong>in</strong> 1988-99.<br />

The regional data shows that 64% of all book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong><br />

South East, compared with 48% of all<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g employment. This is a contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

factor to some of <strong>the</strong> issues discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

skill shortages part of <strong>the</strong> report, below.<br />

Table 5.3 is based on <strong>the</strong> comprehensive<br />

survey of skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g issues carried<br />

out by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> National Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Organisation (NTO). This will also be used <strong>in</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r sections as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> source of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

on skills and related issues.<br />

Data on skill levels shows <strong>the</strong> high average<br />

level of qualification <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry across <strong>the</strong><br />

board, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sales and market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

even <strong>in</strong> office adm<strong>in</strong>istration and secretarial.<br />

This clearly reflects <strong>the</strong> perceived desirability of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as an employer, and <strong>the</strong> attempt to<br />

get one foot on <strong>the</strong> ladder. It is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to note <strong>the</strong> very high level of qualifications <strong>in</strong><br />

production, almost as high as management<br />

and editorial.<br />

Table 5.3 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Qualifications No or low Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />

level, % eg O levels eg A levels eg Degree eg postgraduate<br />

% % % %<br />

Management 4 8 6 68 8.0<br />

Editorial 2 10 11 71 2.0<br />

Support 9 14 30 42 0<br />

Office adm<strong>in</strong>. & sec. 6 21 31 34 0<br />

Production 2 11 22 62 0<br />

Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and circulation 3 16 30 44 0<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 4 23 31 42 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 5 16 26 37 0<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

Figure 5.10 Differ<strong>in</strong>g estimates of book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g employment<br />

40000<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Sources Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry, Annual Employment Survey,<br />

Labour Force Survey<br />

• ABI • AES • LFS<br />

2000<br />

34


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 5.11 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g turnover as % of GDP,<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators used for rank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0.5%<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Denmark Germany<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Italy<br />

Sweden<br />

Source EU Commission, Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />

European <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />

Figure 5.12 Book titles published<br />

per million population<br />

UK<br />

EU average<br />

EU average<br />

Denmark<br />

Germany<br />

Greece<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

France<br />

Ireland<br />

Italy<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Austria<br />

Portugal<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden<br />

UK<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Source EU Commission, Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />

European <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />

5.7 International comparisons<br />

A major report produced for <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Commission <strong>in</strong> 1999, which explored<br />

comparative competitiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries across <strong>the</strong> EU, found that <strong>the</strong> lack of<br />

data on a national basis was compounded when<br />

it came to try<strong>in</strong>g to make comparisons across<br />

borders. The <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>the</strong> authors selected (for<br />

want of any better <strong>in</strong> many cases) were:<br />

• Titles per million population (we have already<br />

discussed whe<strong>the</strong>r this is a strength or a<br />

weakness, above)<br />

• Turnover as % of GDP<br />

• Trade balance (aga<strong>in</strong>, problems with this one)<br />

• Turnover growth rate<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis of a weighted consideration of<br />

all <strong>the</strong>se factors, <strong>the</strong> UK was ranked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top<br />

group, along with Denmark, Germany, Spa<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Italy and Sweden.<br />

35


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

6<br />

Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

6.1 Revenues and costs<br />

Very little authoritative data is available on <strong>the</strong><br />

revenues or costs of journal publishers. The<br />

Publishers Association and <strong>the</strong> Association of<br />

Learned and Professional Society Publishers<br />

(ALPSP) have commissioned a number of<br />

surveys, which are referred to here, but <strong>the</strong>se<br />

have been hampered by high non-response<br />

rates, especially on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

publishers. The surveys, carried out <strong>in</strong> 2000<br />

and 2001 for <strong>the</strong> PA and ALPSP by TFPL,<br />

found that <strong>the</strong>re was little overlap between <strong>the</strong><br />

respondents <strong>in</strong> both years, so <strong>the</strong>y took <strong>the</strong><br />

decision to comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> data toge<strong>the</strong>r, which<br />

is shown below <strong>in</strong> table 6.1. Some data was<br />

published by <strong>the</strong> Competition Commission <strong>in</strong> its<br />

report on <strong>the</strong> Reed-Elsevier/Harcourt merger <strong>in</strong><br />

2001, which is also drawn on <strong>in</strong> this section.<br />

Data from <strong>the</strong> Publishers’ Association shows<br />

a healthy growth <strong>in</strong> worldwide revenues to UKbased<br />

publishers (Figure 6.1).<br />

The data from <strong>the</strong> surveys carried out by<br />

TFPL for ALPSP and <strong>the</strong> PA shows <strong>the</strong> extreme<br />

ranges of annual sales and number of titles<br />

produced (Table 6.2). Sales data <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

revenue from subscriptions, licences,<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and any o<strong>the</strong>r source generated<br />

directly by publication of <strong>the</strong> titles.<br />

It also shows how <strong>in</strong>ternationalised <strong>the</strong> journal<br />

market is, with total sales be<strong>in</strong>g far <strong>in</strong> excess of<br />

UK sales. The survey also shows <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of electronic journals: 91 out of 169<br />

publishers toge<strong>the</strong>r produced over 1940 titles<br />

electronically. In 1999, <strong>the</strong> number of titles<br />

(based on 63 out of 96 respondents) was 1200.<br />

58 of <strong>the</strong> respondents publish all <strong>the</strong>ir journals<br />

<strong>in</strong> electronic form (Table 6.3).<br />

Typical revenue and costs for an STM and<br />

humanities/social science journal were supplied<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Competition Commission by Journal<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, but with <strong>the</strong> caveat that <strong>the</strong>se vary<br />

very widely from journal to journal, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on circulation (scale economies), subject matter<br />

and ability to attract advertis<strong>in</strong>g. This shows<br />

some significant differences between STM and<br />

humanities/social science.<br />

Figure 6.1 Journal revenues, £m<br />

Revenues received by UK publishers from worldwide subscriptions to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir UK-based journals (exclud<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g, licens<strong>in</strong>g, etc)<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

1997<br />

Source Publishers Association<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Table 6.1 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators,<br />

1999-2000, based on 169 respondents<br />

Total sales, £m 554.3<br />

Median turnover, £ 205,968<br />

Range of annual sales<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum, £ 1,800<br />

Maximum, £m 111.9<br />

Number of titles produced<br />

Total 2769<br />

Median per publisher 3<br />

Range 1-650<br />

Table 6.2 UK sales, based on 167 publishers<br />

Total UK sales, £m 190.6<br />

Median turnover, £ 70,000<br />

Range of annual UK sales<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum, £ 200<br />

Maximum, £m 67<br />

Source TFPL for ALPSP and PA<br />

Table 6.3 Electronic journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

No. of publishers produc<strong>in</strong>g electronic journals 91<br />

No. of titles produced electronically 1940<br />

Source TFPL for ALPSP and PA<br />

36


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 6.5 Typical <strong>in</strong>come and costs of<br />

a journal, percentage of total<br />

Revenues<br />

STM<br />

Humanities and<br />

social sciences<br />

Subscriptions 85 74<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle-copy/back volumes 6 2<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g/mail<strong>in</strong>g list 5 2<br />

Offpr<strong>in</strong>ts/repr<strong>in</strong>ts 1 8<br />

Permissions 1 0<br />

<strong>Page</strong> charges/submission fees 0 12<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 2 0<br />

Total 100 100<br />

Costs<br />

Production 58 56<br />

Postage 6 7<br />

Distribution 2 2<br />

Total 66 64<br />

Gross marg<strong>in</strong> 34 36<br />

Source Journal <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Table 6.6 Percentage annual price <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

<strong>in</strong> journals<br />

Science and Medic<strong>in</strong>e Humanities and Inflation<br />

technology social (based<br />

sciences on RPI)<br />

1990 12.5 13.5 11.9 9<br />

1991 9 -1.9 18.3 6<br />

1992 14.1 16.5 14.5 4<br />

1993 7.8 5.9 6.9 2<br />

1994 23.5 21.8 17.2 2<br />

1995 10.5 8.8 7.3 3<br />

1996 13.5 12.3 11.1 2<br />

1997 9.3 10.7 7.4 3<br />

1998 2.4 6 9.5 3<br />

1999 10.6 5.9 9.4 2<br />

2000 10 12 14 2<br />

Source Blackwell’s<br />

The Competition Commission report gave an<br />

estimate of <strong>the</strong> number of new STM journals<br />

launched each year from 1990 to 2000 as about<br />

200-300, with considerable variation from year<br />

to year and no obvious trend. The report said<br />

that ‘considerably’ fewer than 200 journals are<br />

successfully established each year. It does not<br />

appear from figures given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report that<br />

large publishers (by market share) account for<br />

a disproportionately large share of successful<br />

launches. Medium-sized publishers did<br />

especially well at launches compared with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

market share. Given <strong>the</strong> problem that library<br />

budgets are limited, a new journal usually has<br />

to replace a title and so <strong>the</strong> key factor is how<br />

quickly a publisher can respond to a shift <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a research community.<br />

Publishers of lead<strong>in</strong>g journals have tended to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> size and price of <strong>the</strong>ir ‘must-have’<br />

journals, as an alternative to launch<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

titles. This can squeeze <strong>the</strong> market space<br />

available to new entrants.<br />

6.2 Prices<br />

The percentage changes <strong>in</strong> journal prices for<br />

each year s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Blackwell’s<br />

Periodicals Division, show that prices have<br />

tended to rise considerably faster than <strong>the</strong><br />

average rate of <strong>in</strong>flation.<br />

37


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

7<br />

Newspapers<br />

7.1 Revenue trends<br />

Figures 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 show <strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> net<br />

revenues accru<strong>in</strong>g to publishers, from both copy<br />

sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g, for national and regional<br />

papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

This positive overall picture conceals a<br />

divergence <strong>in</strong> performance between revenues<br />

from copy sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The divergence is particularly marked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

case of regional papers, even when advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

revenue for free papers is excluded. The logical<br />

consequence of this is an <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

dependence on advertis<strong>in</strong>g, as illustrated <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 7.4.<br />

7.2 Circulation and cover prices<br />

Revenue from copy sales of course reflects two<br />

elements: circulation and cover price.<br />

Cover prices (Figures 7.5 and 7.6) have risen<br />

faster for regional papers than for nationals:<br />

39% aga<strong>in</strong>st 32% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 1991-2000.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national press, <strong>the</strong> average cover<br />

price of popular titles <strong>in</strong>creased slightly faster<br />

than that of <strong>the</strong> qualities.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> circulation side, qualities have held up<br />

better than <strong>the</strong> circulation of ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> midmarket<br />

or mass market titles (Figures 7.7 and<br />

7.8) . On <strong>the</strong> face of it, this might <strong>in</strong>dicate that<br />

competitive pric<strong>in</strong>g has succeeded <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

purchase, and <strong>the</strong> cut <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> price of The Times<br />

has certa<strong>in</strong>ly had this effect. But <strong>the</strong>re are many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r factors beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> circulation of<br />

<strong>the</strong> mass market titles, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

frequency of purchase, itself partly driven by <strong>the</strong><br />

sharp fall <strong>in</strong> home delivery. Over <strong>the</strong> period<br />

1993-2001 3.4m fewer people have a paper<br />

delivered on Mondays to Fridays, and 5.3m<br />

fewer on Sundays.<br />

Overall circulation of newspapers has recently<br />

been boosted by <strong>the</strong> creation of free daily<br />

metropolitan papers <strong>in</strong> London and o<strong>the</strong>r cities.<br />

Free newspaper distribution has been ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

recently, even without <strong>the</strong> new free dailies<br />

(Figure 7.9).<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> type of advertis<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

we can see <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> higher growth <strong>in</strong><br />

classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g compared to display <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir share of revenues <strong>in</strong> 2000, compared with<br />

1991. In national newspapers <strong>the</strong> share of<br />

classifieds rose from 18.5% to 24.2%, while <strong>in</strong><br />

regionals (all papers, free and paid-for) it rose<br />

from 61.2% <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 66.7% <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

Of course, many of <strong>the</strong> highest circulation<br />

papers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national market do not depend on<br />

classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g at all, but among <strong>the</strong><br />

broadsheets, some have important revenue<br />

streams from recruitment classifieds <strong>in</strong><br />

particular.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> threat to classified revenues<br />

(both regional and national) from Internet-only<br />

competitors appears to have receded compared<br />

with two years ago, <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> Internet is<br />

ris<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> functionality of onl<strong>in</strong>e classifieds<br />

will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to improve relative to paper, so<br />

<strong>the</strong>re rema<strong>in</strong>s an issue. All <strong>the</strong> papers have<br />

taken defensive measures <strong>in</strong> relation to this<br />

issue, which will be discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

report. There is also a threat to <strong>the</strong>se revenues<br />

from free advertis<strong>in</strong>g ‘papers’, many of which<br />

are distributed from racks <strong>in</strong> large supermarket<br />

entrances.<br />

7.3 Number of titles<br />

The number of daily national titles has rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

stable s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995, while <strong>the</strong> number of Sunday<br />

papers has risen by two. The number of<br />

regional dailies and Sundays has risen, with <strong>the</strong><br />

daily titles boosted by <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> free<br />

Metros. Regional non-dailies have decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

number slightly, and <strong>the</strong> total number of free<br />

papers has also fallen, from 630 <strong>in</strong> 1996 to 581<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2000. In general, barriers to entry for<br />

newspapers are quite high, whereas it is<br />

reasonably cheap to launch a free, advertis<strong>in</strong>gonly<br />

‘paper’, which, although it conta<strong>in</strong>s no<br />

editorial, still represents a threat to <strong>the</strong><br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenues of papers that do ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

editorial staffs. These sheets can quickly atta<strong>in</strong><br />

critical mass from an advertiser’s viewpo<strong>in</strong>t if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can secure good distribution methods.<br />

38


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 7.1 Net revenues, all newspapers,<br />

current prices<br />

3500, £m<br />

• All nationals • All regionals<br />

Figure 7.3 Net revenue from advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

copy sales, regional paid-for newspapers<br />

2000<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g, paid for newspapers • Copy sales<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

1500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

500<br />

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999<br />

1991 1993 1995<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 7.2 Net revenue from advertis<strong>in</strong>g and copy<br />

sales, national newspapers<br />

2000, £m<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g • Copy sales 100, %<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Figure 7.4 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g as % of net revenues,<br />

regional papers<br />

1500<br />

80<br />

60<br />

1000<br />

40<br />

500<br />

20<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

><br />

39


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 7.5 Average cover prices<br />

50, pence<br />

40<br />

• Nationals • Regionals<br />

Figure 7.8 Regional newspapers,<br />

copies sold per annum<br />

2600, m<br />

30<br />

2400<br />

20<br />

2200<br />

10<br />

2000<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 7.6 Prices by market segment,<br />

national press<br />

Figure 7.9 Free newspapers distributed per annum<br />

70, pence<br />

• All qualities • All populars<br />

2000, m<br />

• Weeklies • Dailies<br />

60<br />

50<br />

1500<br />

40<br />

30<br />

1000<br />

20<br />

500<br />

10<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 7.7 Circulation of national dailies<br />

Figure 7.10 Employment <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

10000, thousands<br />

• Mass market • Mid market • Broadsheet<br />

80000<br />

8000<br />

60000<br />

6000<br />

40000<br />

4000<br />

20000<br />

1991 1993 1995<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

Source Labour Force Survey<br />

40


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 7.1 Regional pattern of employment<br />

All <strong>in</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry by region; not<br />

seasonally adjusted; United K<strong>in</strong>gdom; spr<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />

22.1 22.12:<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Newspaper<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 194780 67819<br />

Tyne & Wear 3801 2464<br />

Rest of North East 440 440<br />

Greater Manchester 1978 1493<br />

Merseyside 853 853<br />

Rest of North West 5256 1331<br />

South Yorkshire 1789 815<br />

West Yorkshire 4131 1735<br />

Rest of Yorkshire & Humberside 2533 2061<br />

East Midlands 8926 4368<br />

West Midlands<br />

Metropolitan County 6183 2832<br />

Rest of West Midlands 4718 3706<br />

East of England 24019 5749<br />

Inner London 31107 5057<br />

Outer London 29108 7160<br />

South East 34201 7307<br />

South West 13013 6136<br />

Wales 3947 2568<br />

Strathclyde 5783 3992<br />

Rest of Scotland 8578 4808<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland 4416 2944<br />

Source Labour Force Survey<br />

7.4 Employment and related issues<br />

Figure 7.10 shows employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry as recorded by <strong>the</strong> Labour<br />

Force Survey. Data refers to <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g of each<br />

year. No clear trend is discernible. The<br />

variability is ma<strong>in</strong>ly a product of <strong>the</strong> very small<br />

sample sizes at this level of detail. That is to<br />

say, a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>dividual report<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y work<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector, or that <strong>the</strong>y no longer work <strong>in</strong> it, is<br />

reflected <strong>in</strong> large movements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reported<br />

total employment. The Newspaper Society<br />

collects some employment data for <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

press, but is not confident that its survey is truly<br />

representative. The Newspaper Publishers<br />

Association collects no employment data for <strong>the</strong><br />

national press. Official data from <strong>the</strong> employer<br />

side (Annual Employment Survey, Annual<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry) also shows variability. Industry<br />

representatives suggested that <strong>in</strong> recent years<br />

newspapers took on quite a lot of staff to<br />

develop electronic offer<strong>in</strong>gs and may<br />

subsequently have reduced <strong>the</strong>ir numbers,<br />

possibly account<strong>in</strong>g for part of <strong>the</strong> most recent<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases and decreases.<br />

The regional pattern of employment (Table<br />

7.1) differs from much of <strong>the</strong> rest of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g less centred on London and <strong>the</strong> South<br />

East, as would be expected. Whereas 48.5% of<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong><br />

South East, only 28.4% of newspaper<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g employment is.<br />

><br />

41


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

7.5 Skill levels and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Skill levels <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g are<br />

generally high <strong>in</strong> management and editorial,<br />

but markedly less so <strong>in</strong> sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration, and <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g (Table 7.2).<br />

This is especially <strong>the</strong> case when compared with<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, where 40% of sales and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

staff have higher or advanced qualifications,<br />

and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 33% have <strong>in</strong>termediate level<br />

qualifications, while 29% of advertis<strong>in</strong>g staff<br />

have higher or advanced level qualifications<br />

and a fur<strong>the</strong>r 38% have <strong>in</strong>termediate level<br />

qualifications.<br />

However, significantly higher percentages of<br />

newspaper employers have a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plan<br />

compared with magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers (64%<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st 40%) and only 5% of employers <strong>in</strong><br />

newspapers provide no tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, aga<strong>in</strong>st 11%<br />

of magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers.<br />

Only 8% of newspaper employers reported<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g hard-to-fill vacancies, compared with<br />

10% <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g as a whole (Table 7.3). The<br />

turnover rate <strong>in</strong> newspapers, at 15.9%, is also<br />

lower than <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g overall (22.4%).<br />

Table 7.2 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

No or Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />

low e.g. e.g. e.g. e.g.<br />

level O levels A levels degree postgraduate<br />

Management 2 2 18 68 8<br />

Editorial 1 4 25 64 4<br />

Support 1 22 64 11 1<br />

Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec 1 51 42 3 0<br />

Production 1 49 46 1 0<br />

Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

circulation 1 55 39 3 0<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 1 83 12 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 90 8 0 0 0<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

Table 7.3 Newspaper employers report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

skill shortages<br />

Employer report<strong>in</strong>g skill shortage, % 20<br />

Employer report<strong>in</strong>g no skill shortage, % 80<br />

Total 100<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

42


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 7.11 Purchases of services<br />

300, £m<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Source ONS ABI<br />

Computers<br />

and related<br />

purchases<br />

Purchases of<br />

road transport<br />

• 1997 • 1998 • 1999<br />

Purchases of<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g services<br />

7.6 Productivity and costs<br />

Data from <strong>the</strong> Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry is only<br />

available from 1993, and <strong>the</strong>re is a break <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

consistency of <strong>the</strong> series <strong>in</strong> 1997, with some<br />

variables not available even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se years. The<br />

data that exists shows <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g trends <strong>in</strong><br />

output, productivity, <strong>in</strong>vestment and costs (with<br />

<strong>the</strong> caveats as mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> employment<br />

section above):<br />

• Turnover as a percentage of GDP appears<br />

to have slipped from 0.62% <strong>in</strong> 1995 to 0.56%<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1999<br />

• Turnover per employee rose by 15% between<br />

1993 and 1997, and <strong>the</strong>n by 8% between<br />

1998 and 1999<br />

• Employment costs rose sharply between 1993<br />

and 1997, but <strong>the</strong>n decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

• Capital expenditure decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> years<br />

1994 and 1995, rose <strong>in</strong> 1998 and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed slightly.<br />

Figure 7.11 shows expenditure by newspaper<br />

companies (SIC 22.12) on some of <strong>the</strong> most<br />

important elements of <strong>the</strong>ir costs. Paper is not<br />

broken out separately <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ABI data but trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> newspr<strong>in</strong>t prices were illustrated above.<br />

><br />

43


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

7.7 International comparisons<br />

The EU report referred to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g also compared <strong>the</strong> performance of<br />

newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g. The measures which it<br />

used as competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

newspaper sector were:<br />

• Circulation per 1000 population (Figure 7.12)<br />

• Titles per million<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue as % of GDP<br />

• Sales revenue as % of GDP<br />

• Turnover growth rate<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong>se measures, which were<br />

weighted to give a total score, <strong>the</strong> UK, along<br />

with Denmark and <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, occupied<br />

<strong>the</strong> highest rank. The UK scored higher <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to revenue, but somewhat lower <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to circulation and number of titles per<br />

million population than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two.<br />

The same report made some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

comparisons between cost and revenue<br />

structures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries, albeit for 1997<br />

(Table 7.4).<br />

The figure for <strong>the</strong> UK does not equate to<br />

<strong>the</strong> net revenue numbers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Association data. If ad revenue from free<br />

newspapers is <strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contribution amounts to 68% for 1997, and if<br />

only ad revenue from paid-for papers is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>the</strong> figure is closer at 52%.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> cost side, <strong>the</strong> report gives <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 7.5.<br />

This shows considerable differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cost structures. Content and adm<strong>in</strong>istration and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g account for a higher proportion of<br />

costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK. This presumably reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry does not have to spend as<br />

much as its European counterparts on pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(labour costs are lower) or on distribution – it is<br />

cheaper to distribute through <strong>the</strong> newstrade<br />

than via subscription-based home delivery,<br />

which is much more common <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

The chart (Figure 7.13) show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

comparisons of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue accru<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

newspapers shows that UK newspapers are<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share better than most of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational counterparts.<br />

44


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 7.12 Circulation per 1000 population<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

Figure 7.13 Newspaper share of<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />

80, %<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

• 1996 • 2000<br />

10<br />

UK<br />

Denmark<br />

Source EU Commission<br />

Germany<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Sweden<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

France<br />

Italy<br />

EU average<br />

UK<br />

US<br />

Germany<br />

Source World Press Trends<br />

France<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Sweden<br />

Italy<br />

Japan<br />

Table 7.4 Revenue structure differences <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> EU newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, 1997<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Circulation sales<br />

contribution<br />

contribution<br />

to turnover, % to turnover, %<br />

Belgium 51.6 48.4<br />

Denmark 61.8 38.2<br />

Germany 66.9 33.1<br />

Greece 51.0 49.0<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 43.9 56.1<br />

France 50 50<br />

Ireland 44.5 55.5<br />

Luxembourg 47.2 52.8<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 65.9 34.1<br />

Austria 67.1 32.9<br />

Portugal 31.7 68.3<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 53.3 46.7<br />

Sweden 55.4 44.6<br />

UK 58.9 41.1<br />

Average 55.5 44.5<br />

Source EU Commission<br />

Table 7.5 Cost structure of selected newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustries,<br />

% of total, 1997<br />

1.1.1.2 Content Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Adm<strong>in</strong>istration Distribution<br />

and paper and market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

UK 40 20 28 12<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 23.2 31 21.4 23.4<br />

Germany 23.2 35.4 21.6 19.8<br />

France 16-22 25-35 22-33 10-25<br />

Source EU Commission<br />

45


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

8<br />

Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

8.1 Activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es divide broadly <strong>in</strong>to consumer and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es. They not only<br />

have different end-user groups, but different<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, levels of brand extension and<br />

distribution methods. Data specifically referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es will be<br />

considered toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next section, as many,<br />

although not all, of <strong>the</strong> companies <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

produce across <strong>the</strong> range of bus<strong>in</strong>ess media,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, newsletters,<br />

databases and events.<br />

Statistics on <strong>the</strong> consumer part of <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess are more comprehensive than those<br />

on <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess side, but we are rely<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry data ra<strong>the</strong>r than official statistics <strong>in</strong><br />

this segment as <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition ‘journals and<br />

periodicals’ is not helpful <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es per se.<br />

However, some data on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry will be<br />

presented which crosses <strong>the</strong> divide: namely<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial data (as many companies are engaged<br />

<strong>in</strong> both consumer and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g) and data relat<strong>in</strong>g to skill<br />

levels and skill shortages. This is presented at<br />

<strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> consumer section. International<br />

comparisons will also be presented here.<br />

8.2 Revenues<br />

The revenue from consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es, like<br />

newspapers, comes from two ma<strong>in</strong> sources:<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and copy sales. The trends <strong>in</strong><br />

expenditure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are shown <strong>in</strong> Figures 8.1<br />

and 8.2.<br />

It can be seen from <strong>the</strong> data on advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

expenditure that <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> revenue source and<br />

growth area has been <strong>in</strong> display advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than classifieds. Magaz<strong>in</strong>es are<br />

attempt<strong>in</strong>g to enhance <strong>the</strong>ir appeal to<br />

advertisers <strong>in</strong> a number of ways. Individual<br />

companies that possess a range of titles that<br />

appeal to different age, gender and <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

groups are able to offer advertisers ‘one stop<br />

shops’. If <strong>the</strong>y also have radio stations and<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e and digital TV <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y can<br />

offer cross-media deals, although <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

currently more high-profile examples of this <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> US than here e.g. AOL-Time Warner,<br />

Proctor and Gamble. On an <strong>in</strong>dustry wide basis,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are currently trials of an advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trad<strong>in</strong>g system, pioneered by <strong>the</strong> Periodical<br />

Publishers’ Association, which aims to make it<br />

much easier for advertisers to <strong>in</strong>vite bids, book<br />

ads, and eventually deal with <strong>in</strong>voices and<br />

payments electronically. This is designed to<br />

overcome <strong>the</strong> disadvantages of hav<strong>in</strong>g to deal<br />

with many titles, as well as reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative burden on sales staff and cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

down <strong>the</strong> level of rout<strong>in</strong>e disputes over whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

or not advertisements were booked.<br />

8.3 Copy sales and cover prices<br />

In terms of spend<strong>in</strong>g on magaz<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> picture<br />

has been one of remarkable growth,<br />

with a recent levell<strong>in</strong>g off.<br />

Clearly this expenditure results from a<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> trends <strong>in</strong> cover prices and<br />

<strong>the</strong> numbers of copies sold.<br />

The trend <strong>in</strong> copies sold (Figure 8.3) reveals<br />

that after growth to 1996, sales have been<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g somewhat. Cover prices have risen<br />

quite substantially (Figure 8.4), from 72.3 pence<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1991 to 133.4 pence <strong>in</strong> 2000. In constant<br />

1995 prices (Figure 8.5), <strong>the</strong> average price per<br />

copy rose from 80.8 pence <strong>in</strong> 1991 to 116.8<br />

pence <strong>in</strong> 2000.<br />

46


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 8.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />

Figure 8.4 Price trends<br />

800, £m<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

• Classified • Display • Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

160, pence<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 8.2 Purchasers’ spend<strong>in</strong>g on magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Figure 8.5 Net revenue by source<br />

2000, £m<br />

200, £m<br />

• From advertis<strong>in</strong>g • From copy sales • Total<br />

1500<br />

150<br />

1000<br />

100<br />

500<br />

50<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Figure 8.3 Sales of conventional<br />

consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1500, m<br />

1200<br />

900<br />

600<br />

300<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

><br />

47


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

8.4 Titles and launches<br />

The appeal of magaz<strong>in</strong>es and <strong>the</strong> launch of new<br />

titles (Figures 8.6 and 8.7, which have a higher<br />

than average price) has managed to persuade<br />

consumers to keep spend<strong>in</strong>g, although <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are some signs of a slowdown. Titles, and even<br />

whole categories, can now show patterns of<br />

boom and bust, perhaps reveal<strong>in</strong>g a more fickle<br />

and less brand loyal readership.<br />

New title launches are widely regarded as a<br />

major driver of market expansion, although also<br />

a source of difficulty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g generat<strong>in</strong>g large amounts of waste<br />

(with environmental implications).<br />

It’s too soon to say what <strong>the</strong> real trend is <strong>in</strong><br />

launches, but <strong>the</strong> concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and changes <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits (see Section<br />

16.4) certa<strong>in</strong>ly pose a threat to future launch<br />

activity, especially from smaller publishers or<br />

new entrants.<br />

Figure 8.6 Titles produced<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

1991 1993 1995<br />

Source BRAD<br />

Figure 8.7 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e launches<br />

800<br />

700<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

600<br />

Table 8.1 Life cycle <strong>in</strong>dicators, % changes,<br />

year on year, sales volumes<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

All titles 0.5 2.1 1.1 -0.6 -0.5<br />

Constant titles 0.2 -1.6 -2.0 -4.0 -3.3<br />

Constant and<br />

dead titles -2.6 -3.6 -3.1 -4.3 -3.9<br />

200<br />

100<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

48


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 8.8 Chang<strong>in</strong>g retail shares of<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e sales<br />

60, %<br />

50<br />

40<br />

• 1995 • 2001<br />

8.5 Returns and wastage<br />

In <strong>the</strong> year 2000, <strong>the</strong> level of waste at <strong>the</strong> retail<br />

level was estimated at 27% and that at <strong>the</strong><br />

wholesale level 3%. This apparently worsen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trend is partly due to some magaz<strong>in</strong>es be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

moved from firm sale to sale or return, and<br />

partly to better monitor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Table 8.2 Returns (Waste – level of returns, %)<br />

1990 1994 1995-99 2000 2nd half<br />

2000<br />

10<br />

CTN<br />

Convenience store<br />

Grocery<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Petrol stations<br />

Figure 8.9 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers activities<br />

100, %<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

Websites<br />

Specials<br />

List rental<br />

Books<br />

Title sp<strong>in</strong>-offs<br />

Personal products<br />

CD-ROM products<br />

Travel po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Database mgt<br />

Fairs/events<br />

Source PPA, Develop<strong>in</strong>g Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e brands (2001)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Exhibitions<br />

20 30 29-31 30 32<br />

Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

8.6 Sales channels<br />

The majority of magaz<strong>in</strong>es are sold to<br />

consumers through retail outlets ra<strong>the</strong>r than by<br />

subscription (Figure 8.8), with 89% of sales via<br />

retail and 11% by subscription <strong>in</strong> 2000,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Periodical Publishers’<br />

Association.<br />

8.7 Brand extension<br />

Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have engaged<br />

<strong>in</strong> a variety of brand extension activities,<br />

illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 8.9. While some are clearly<br />

seen as almost <strong>in</strong>dispensable (such as a<br />

website), o<strong>the</strong>rs, like sp<strong>in</strong>-off merchandise,<br />

are m<strong>in</strong>ority activities. Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not a title<br />

will support an exhibition, for example,<br />

depends very much on <strong>the</strong> size and type<br />

of readership. Opportunities for platform<br />

extensions (web, digital TV) are discussed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> digital section of Part 2.<br />

It may be worth not<strong>in</strong>g here that <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers we spoke to all told us that<br />

brand extension activities support brand<br />

recognition and <strong>the</strong>refore are often helpful <strong>in</strong><br />

buttress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e’s position, but <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

not represent serious revenue streams. This<br />

can be because <strong>the</strong> activity is undertaken on a<br />

publishers’ behalf by a contractor under licence,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce mak<strong>in</strong>g clo<strong>the</strong>s or cosmetics, or even<br />

putt<strong>in</strong>g on exhibitions is not <strong>the</strong> core<br />

competence of <strong>the</strong> publisher. Database or list<br />

rental activities might be <strong>the</strong> exception to this<br />

generalisation <strong>in</strong> terms of revenue generation.<br />

49


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

8.8 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A major growth area of consumer publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> last few years has been <strong>the</strong> production of<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es under contract, often to major<br />

companies such as retailers, supermarkets,<br />

airl<strong>in</strong>es, membership organisations and so on,<br />

and usually for free distribution to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

customer or membership base (Figure 8.10).<br />

This is part of an overall drive by organisations<br />

to build customer loyalty and <strong>in</strong>crease brand<br />

strength. Traditional magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have<br />

exploited this new market and advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agencies have also become big players as an<br />

extension of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r brand build<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />

<strong>the</strong>y undertake for clients.<br />

8.9 Pan-magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector data<br />

8.9.1 Skill levels and skill shortages<br />

In common with o<strong>the</strong>r areas of publish<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>deed even more so <strong>in</strong> some respects,<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g employees have very high<br />

levels of qualifications, reflect<strong>in</strong>g its desirability<br />

as an occupation (Table 8.3).<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e employers were slightly poorer at<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g than were publishers overall<br />

(Table 8.4). At <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> Skills Foresight<br />

report survey, <strong>the</strong>y also faced <strong>the</strong> highest level<br />

of hard-to-fill vacancies, at 15% compared with<br />

10% <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g overall. Difficulty <strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vacancies is also much more problematic <strong>in</strong><br />

London than elsewhere. The staff turnover rate<br />

<strong>in</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>es at 31.1% was much higher than <strong>in</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g overall (22.4%).<br />

Figure 8.10 Contract publish<strong>in</strong>g agency turnover<br />

250, £m<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

Table 8.3 Skill levels <strong>in</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1997<br />

Table 8.4 Skill shortages and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Skill shortages<br />

1999<br />

No or Basic Intermediate Higher Advanced<br />

low e.g. e.g. e.g. e.g.<br />

level O levels A levels degree postgraduate<br />

Management 5 6 13 61 14<br />

Editorial 5 4 15 63 8<br />

Support 4 12 41 31 4<br />

Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec 7 19 42 22 3<br />

Production 6 15 33 34 2<br />

Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

circulation 6 12 33 38 2<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 5 14 38 27 2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 14 10 28 41 0<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

Employer report<strong>in</strong>g skill shortage, % 12<br />

Employer report<strong>in</strong>g no skill shortage, % 88<br />

Total 100<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Employers with tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plan,% 40<br />

Employers with tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g budget, % 52<br />

Provides on and off job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, % 56<br />

Provides off job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only, % 9<br />

Provides on job tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only, % 23<br />

Provides nei<strong>the</strong>r, % 11<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r, all publish<strong>in</strong>g, % 10<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

50


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

8.9.2 Profitability<br />

Indications of profitability and productivity are<br />

drawn from only <strong>the</strong> largest companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, as reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir reports and<br />

accounts and analysed by Prospect Shop.<br />

This data shows an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sales per<br />

employee but a slight fall <strong>in</strong> profit and return<br />

on capital. The rise <strong>in</strong> capital per employee is<br />

quite marked.<br />

Table 8.5 F<strong>in</strong>ancial data (based on lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

150 companies, but actually drawn from<br />

112 that filed)<br />

1997-98 1998-99 1999-00<br />

Return on capital 36.6 33.2 28.8<br />

Pretax profit marg<strong>in</strong> 12.7 11.4 11.2<br />

Profit per £ of pay 0.82 0.73 0.69<br />

Return on <strong>in</strong>vestment 33.9 30.4 25.2<br />

Stocks/sales 2.0 2.0 1.9<br />

Pay per employee, £ 19359 20861 22283<br />

Sales per employee, £000 124 131 136<br />

Capital employed per<br />

employee, £000 44 46 54<br />

Exports/sales 13.4 12.7 11.2<br />

Debt/net worth 103.6 85.4 80<br />

Source The Prospect Shop<br />

8.9.3 International comparisons<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Figures 8.11 and 8.12 shows<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles <strong>in</strong> different countries, <strong>in</strong> total<br />

and per million population, which shows <strong>the</strong><br />

relatively large number produced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK,<br />

which outperforms <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r major magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g countries (US, Germany and France)<br />

on a per capita basis.<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK do not manage to<br />

secure as high a proportion of <strong>the</strong> available<br />

ad spend as several of <strong>the</strong>ir European<br />

counterparts (Figure 8.13).<br />

The study on EU publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

competitiveness, referred to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> newspapers<br />

and books sections above, uses a number of<br />

variables to rank <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustries of<br />

member states, illustrated <strong>in</strong> Table 8.7. It ranks<br />

only <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustries of France, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

and Germany <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest level. The UK falls<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> next highest, presumably on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and issue readership.<br />

The study identifies a regional group<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> UK, France and Germany, whose<br />

strengths are:<br />

• The consumer title segment<br />

• The ability to develop strong <strong>in</strong>ternational titles<br />

• Good postal distribution systems<br />

Weaknesses <strong>in</strong> this region are:<br />

• Ris<strong>in</strong>g production and distribution costs<br />

• Saturated domestic markets<br />

This latter po<strong>in</strong>t would probably be disputed<br />

by UK publishers. In our <strong>in</strong>terviews we asked<br />

all <strong>the</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers if <strong>the</strong>y<br />

believed that <strong>the</strong>re were too many magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y all said that <strong>the</strong> market was always<br />

evolv<strong>in</strong>g, giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to new opportunities.<br />

However, it is a function of <strong>the</strong> market’s maturity<br />

that new titles will tend to grow at <strong>the</strong> expense<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>rs, and <strong>the</strong>re is some evidence that new<br />

titles are not grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market as much as<br />

<strong>the</strong>y used to.<br />

The table on distribution structure shows very<br />

clearly <strong>the</strong> unusually strong role that retail plays<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e distribution structure<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK and conversely, <strong>the</strong> unusually high<br />

rate of subscriptions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> prevalence of controlled<br />

circulation models <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK compared with,<br />

for example, Germany, results <strong>in</strong> a very high<br />

level of subscription <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK compared with<br />

Germany, but it is not out of l<strong>in</strong>e with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

countries.<br />

><br />

51


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Figure 8.11 International comparisons of<br />

title numbers<br />

Figure 8.13 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e share of total<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend<br />

France<br />

Germany<br />

Italy (1999)<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden<br />

UK<br />

US<br />

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000<br />

• Consumer<br />

• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />

Sweden<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Italy<br />

Germany<br />

France<br />

UK<br />

Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />

Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />

Figure 8.12 Titles per million<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500<br />

France<br />

Germany<br />

Italy (1999)<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden<br />

UK<br />

US<br />

Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />

Table 8.7 EU competitiveness <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

Titles Advertis<strong>in</strong>g, Average issue Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

per million % of GDP readership growth rate revenue<br />

per title<br />

UK 108 0.147 86.5 30.3 0.198656<br />

Denmark 136 0.0681 98.5 30.5 0.313502<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 515 0.103 97 21 0.034458<br />

France 47 0.189 95.2 28.7 0.765442<br />

Germany 76 0.193 96.5 28.4 0.501871<br />

Italy 177 0.106 71.4 25.5 0.186361<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 303 0.261 97.7 0.9 0.151069<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 58 0.122 55.2 39.8 0.262224<br />

Sweden 52 0.081 90 1.8 0.297931<br />

EU average 126 0.128 79 22.5 0.280405<br />

Source Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> EU <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries<br />

Table 8.8 Structure of distribution<br />

Consumer<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess/professional<br />

Subscription Retail Subscription Retail<br />

UK 11 89 90 10<br />

US 84 16 n.a n.a.<br />

France 31.3 68.7 93.5 6.5<br />

Germany 48 52 78 22<br />

Italy 27 73 n.a. n.a.<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 5.5 94.5 95 5<br />

Sweden 70 30 n.a n.a.<br />

Source World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends<br />

52


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

9<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media<br />

9.1 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

9.1.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

(Figure 9.1) shows a faster growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

classified segment than <strong>in</strong> display. Classified ad<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g rose from 28% of <strong>the</strong> total <strong>in</strong> 1991 to<br />

40% by 2000.<br />

Several publishers said <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> strategic<br />

goal of mov<strong>in</strong>g as many of <strong>the</strong>ir ‘free’<br />

subscribers on to a pay<strong>in</strong>g basis as possible<br />

and diversify<strong>in</strong>g revenue streams. One lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

B2B publisher told us:<br />

“We are look<strong>in</strong>g to convert a proportion from<br />

free to paid for whenever <strong>the</strong> opportunity<br />

presents itself. Traditional page advertis<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

weaken<strong>in</strong>g, it is a vulnerable revenue stream.”<br />

9.1.2 Number of titles<br />

The number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles has been<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g until very recently. Some titles have<br />

been hit by <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> technology and<br />

telecoms sector, for example. The data <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 9.2 shows <strong>the</strong> much greater number of<br />

titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess sector than <strong>in</strong> consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

9.1.3 Circulation<br />

A different estimate, conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> World<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends, for <strong>the</strong> total number of<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es sold and distributed <strong>in</strong><br />

2000 came to a fairly astonish<strong>in</strong>g 6050 million.<br />

Table 9.1 Total circulation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess press<br />

titles, m copies<br />

1995 1998<br />

Controlled circulation 196 210<br />

Paid-for 88 90<br />

Total 284 300<br />

Source Keynote<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Table 9.2 shows circulation and<br />

number of titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top 10 sectors, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Audit Bureau of Circulation.<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es have a wider sale<br />

beyond national borders than consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, which tend to <strong>in</strong>ternationalise by<br />

means of sett<strong>in</strong>g up editions elsewhere or<br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g formats to o<strong>the</strong>rs for use. The differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

export shares are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 9.3.<br />

9.1.4 Diversification of revenues<br />

Some very useful ‘snapshot’ <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g was conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study. This shows <strong>the</strong><br />

sheer numbers of companies engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sector and <strong>the</strong> number of titles produced, which<br />

greatly exceeds <strong>the</strong> estimate from BRAD used<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chart above. It also shows <strong>the</strong> extent to<br />

which bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers are us<strong>in</strong>g electronic<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g to provide editorial content.<br />

The revenue breakdown also shows<br />

diversification. Although copy sales and<br />

especially advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> various forms<br />

Table 9.2 Segment circulation<br />

Top 10 bus<strong>in</strong>ess sectors Sector circulation, Sector circulation, No. of titles, No. of titles,<br />

June 2000 June 2001 2000 2001<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess management 990,130 1,221,916 51 61<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ance and <strong>in</strong>vestment 420979 469269 32 36<br />

Accountancy 421681 395088 10 10<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g 246306 404776 15 22<br />

Agriculture 467657 362454 15 11<br />

Architecture 20458 284902 12 15<br />

Build<strong>in</strong>g 225548 242468 19 20<br />

Medical 387125 385898 12 13<br />

Personnel Management 202448 209959 4 4<br />

W<strong>in</strong>es and spirit trade 173649 207205 11 11<br />

Total 3,555,981 4,183,935 181 203<br />

Source ABC<br />

54


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 9.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e survey data<br />

No. of companies 700<br />

No. of titles (magaz<strong>in</strong>es and journals) 10,000<br />

Turnover, £m 3,300<br />

Employees 29,000<br />

Revenue per title, £ 114,000<br />

% of companies publish<strong>in</strong>g only bus<strong>in</strong>ess or<br />

professional titles 76<br />

% publish<strong>in</strong>g more than 50 titles 5<br />

% of companies report<strong>in</strong>g that all <strong>the</strong>ir titles provide<br />

some electronic editorial content 40<br />

% of o<strong>the</strong>r companies report<strong>in</strong>g that more than<br />

50% of <strong>the</strong>ir titles provide some electronic<br />

editorial content 8<br />

% of titles distributed free of charge to targeted<br />

readership 70<br />

Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Figure 9.1 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure:<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1500<br />

1200<br />

900<br />

600<br />

300<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

1996<br />

• Display • Classified • Total<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Figure 9.2 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles<br />

6000, number of titles<br />

• Consumer titles • Bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Source BRAD<br />

Figure 9.3 Share of exports <strong>in</strong> circulation<br />

15%<br />

* Bus<strong>in</strong>ess category excludes<br />

UK-based <strong>in</strong>ternational titles<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

Consumer titles<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess titles*<br />

Source ABC<br />

><br />

55


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

constitute <strong>the</strong> vast bulk of revenue, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a significant element from electronic and from<br />

<strong>the</strong> ‘o<strong>the</strong>r’ category.<br />

The range of activities undertaken by<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers is shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 9.4.<br />

Unlike consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers,<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers emphasised <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

both of <strong>the</strong> diverse revenue streams and <strong>the</strong><br />

extent to which <strong>the</strong> brand of <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

acted as <strong>the</strong> validat<strong>in</strong>g umbrella for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

activities. Some publishers felt that it was vital<br />

to be present <strong>in</strong> all areas (magaz<strong>in</strong>es, direct<br />

mail, directories, events) <strong>in</strong> order to offer<br />

advertisers <strong>the</strong> choice of appropriate ways<br />

to reach <strong>the</strong>ir customers:<br />

“We try to have a magaz<strong>in</strong>e, directory and<br />

event <strong>in</strong> every sector. We try to see markets <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> round and offer advertisers exactly <strong>the</strong> mix<br />

<strong>the</strong>y want – <strong>the</strong>y will best judge whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y<br />

want to use events, direct mail or pr<strong>in</strong>t for a<br />

campaign and we want to be able to give <strong>the</strong>m<br />

that choice. We can sell <strong>the</strong>se as a package.<br />

We don’t get our divisions to compete with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r but to collaborate to give <strong>the</strong> customer<br />

(advertisers) what <strong>the</strong>y’re look<strong>in</strong>g for. The brand<br />

of <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e is extended and it is <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

which gives <strong>the</strong> advertiser <strong>the</strong> confidence to go<br />

with us, as <strong>the</strong>y know that <strong>the</strong> prestige of <strong>the</strong><br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e brand will be conferred on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

elements, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are exhibitions,<br />

conferences or awards. Because <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

gives confidence to <strong>the</strong> (ultimate) consumer, it<br />

gives confidence to <strong>the</strong> advertiser.”<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that synergies may be overstated:<br />

“There’s lots of talk about <strong>the</strong> need to have a<br />

directory, show, magaz<strong>in</strong>e, etc, <strong>in</strong> each sector<br />

but I’m not conv<strong>in</strong>ced that drives revenues.”<br />

However, that did not underm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> basic<br />

proposition that <strong>the</strong> brand was crucial and that it<br />

was desirable to have many different revenue<br />

streams, whe<strong>the</strong>r electronic, pr<strong>in</strong>t or eventbased.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r specialist publisher of<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and directories told us:<br />

“Ideally we would like to have a portfolio of<br />

products for each market, but sometimes where<br />

we have a magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>re is already a<br />

Figure 9.4 Activities of bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers<br />

100, %<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Websites<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ted directories<br />

Contract publications<br />

List rental/sales<br />

Sponsored publications/<br />

advertorials<br />

Awards/events<br />

Conferences<br />

Exhibitions<br />

Source PPA, B2B Media: Opportunities for growth (2001)<br />

800<br />

600<br />

Table 9.4 Revenue sources, %<br />

1000, £m, current prices<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

Source The Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Newsletters<br />

CD-ROM products<br />

Hard copy subscriptions 17<br />

Display advertis<strong>in</strong>g 43<br />

Recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g 9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r classified 8<br />

Inserts 4<br />

Electronic 5<br />

Newstrade 3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 11<br />

Total 100<br />

Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Figure 9.5 Advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> directories<br />

2000<br />

56


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

compet<strong>in</strong>g directory or where we have a<br />

directory and a magaz<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong>re’s already a<br />

strong exhibition. We try to expand <strong>in</strong> areas<br />

where we have someth<strong>in</strong>g already but we had<br />

lots of bits and pieces that didn’t add up. We<br />

have spent some time <strong>in</strong> last five years tidy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>m up, divest<strong>in</strong>g some, acquir<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>rs, etc.”<br />

9.2 Directories<br />

9.2.1 Nature of directories<br />

Directories fall <strong>in</strong>to two broad categories: firstly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s bus<strong>in</strong>ess location type of<br />

directory, which is free to <strong>the</strong> user and relies<br />

on ubiquity of distribution to drive advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

revenue. They will often list all <strong>the</strong> companies<br />

or organisations free <strong>in</strong> order to guarantee<br />

comprehensiveness and <strong>the</strong>n sell bigger<br />

placement advertis<strong>in</strong>g to companies wish<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

draw greater attention to <strong>the</strong>ir entries.<br />

Secondly, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> more specialist<br />

directory. Directories of <strong>the</strong> latter type can<br />

clearly be more or less general <strong>in</strong> content – <strong>the</strong>y<br />

may refer to all public companies <strong>in</strong> a country,<br />

or to all <strong>the</strong> companies produc<strong>in</strong>g particular<br />

types of equipment or services. These<br />

directories often rely on copy sales revenue as<br />

well as advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue, and some<br />

directories do not take advertis<strong>in</strong>g at all. Even<br />

where <strong>the</strong>re is no advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> directory<br />

itself, <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> it can constitute a valuable<br />

resource to firms wish<strong>in</strong>g to target o<strong>the</strong>r firms <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 9.5 Directory publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey results<br />

Revenue, £m 1,464<br />

Employees 20,000<br />

Turnover per employee, £ 75,000<br />

Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

that sector, and so <strong>the</strong>re is a bus<strong>in</strong>ess model <strong>in</strong><br />

list rental and so on. A powerful niche can be<br />

created <strong>in</strong> a particular <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector that acts<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r providers and users of<br />

products and services. Clearly, directories are<br />

hard to separate from databases, and electronic<br />

versions of directories are a natural extension<br />

and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly are replac<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ted versions.<br />

They are easier to keep up to date and more<br />

functional for <strong>the</strong> user. Many directory<br />

companies clearly are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forefront of us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technology to hold content <strong>in</strong> a format-neutral<br />

way to use <strong>in</strong> a number of different ways.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Figure 9.5 and Tables 9.5 and 9.6<br />

show <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue performance of<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector, driven ma<strong>in</strong>ly by <strong>the</strong> Yellow <strong>Page</strong>stype<br />

of directory, and <strong>the</strong>n snapshot data from<br />

<strong>the</strong> BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study and from<br />

<strong>the</strong> survey of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry carried out by<br />

K<strong>in</strong>gston University for <strong>the</strong> Directory Publishers’<br />

Association. Data from this survey which is of<br />

particular <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> sources of<br />

revenues by format/activity.<br />

><br />

57


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

Table 9.6 Directory <strong>in</strong>dustry survey data<br />

Results from K<strong>in</strong>gston University/DPA surveys (based on 32 usable<br />

responses from a sampl<strong>in</strong>g frame of 164 – too low to be generalisable)<br />

Turnover category, % of respondents (number of<br />

respondents varies)<br />

1998 1999 2000<br />

Small (up to £2.8m) 60 66 69<br />

Medium (£2.9m-£11.2m) 0 3 3<br />

Large (£11.2m+) 9 9 9<br />

No response 31 22 19<br />

Number of employees category, % of<br />

respondents (number of respondents varies)<br />

1998 1999 2000<br />

0 to 5 28 35 25<br />

6 to 10 25 28 25<br />

11 to 20 9 9 19<br />

21 to 50 16 19 22<br />

Subtotal 78 91 91<br />

Above 50 6 6 9<br />

No response 16 3 0<br />

Average turnover per employee, £ 132,000<br />

Average turnover per title, £ 196,000<br />

Firms by number of titles, % of respondents<br />

(number of respondents varies)<br />

1998 1999 2000<br />

1 to 5 38 47 44<br />

6 to 10 31 22 16<br />

11 to 20 6 16 22<br />

Sub total 75 85 82<br />

Above 20 12 12 15<br />

No response 13 3 3<br />

NB same title may be sold <strong>in</strong> a number of different media<br />

Sales revenue by medium,% of turnover<br />

1998 1999 2000<br />

Data sales<br />

Hard copy 71 67 63<br />

CD ROM 16 17 16<br />

Internet 0 2 8<br />

Mail<strong>in</strong>g labels/lists 3 3 3<br />

Data on disk 5 5 5<br />

Subtotal, all data sales 95 94 94<br />

Ad sales<br />

Hard copy 5 6 5<br />

CD ROM 0


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 9.7 Newsletters and<br />

management reports<br />

Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess survey results<br />

Number of companies <strong>in</strong>volved 270<br />

% with newsletters, etc, as primary activity 20<br />

Employees 12,500<br />

Turnover, £m 271<br />

% publish<strong>in</strong>g exclusively for bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

professional market 72<br />

% publish<strong>in</strong>g between 2 and 10 titles 48<br />

% publish<strong>in</strong>g between 10 and 50 titles 36<br />

% publish<strong>in</strong>g some editorial electronically 55<br />

% of titles with electronic editorial content 22<br />

Total circulation, million 11<br />

Percentage with fewer than 10,000 subscribers 58<br />

% with fewer than 1000 subscribers 26<br />

% of companies offer<strong>in</strong>g multiple subscription<br />

deals/site licences 57<br />

Breakdown of revenues, %<br />

Hard copy subscriptions 40<br />

Display advertis<strong>in</strong>g 11<br />

Recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g 3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r classified 4<br />

Inserts 14<br />

Electronic 7<br />

Newstrade 3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 18<br />

Total 100<br />

Source Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

9.3 Newsletters and reports<br />

There is no regularly collected data on <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g of newsletters, but <strong>the</strong> data from <strong>the</strong><br />

BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study shows that<br />

this is an important segment of publish<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

although for <strong>the</strong> vast majority of companies, this<br />

is not <strong>the</strong>ir primary activity. Twenty-six percent<br />

have fewer than 1000 subscribers, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

newsletters can be a high value activity for<br />

niche markets. Electronic distribution is also<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g more important, as would be<br />

expected for a medium which is based on<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g a tightly def<strong>in</strong>ed bus<strong>in</strong>ess audience<br />

with up-to-date news and analysis.<br />

Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees argued that <strong>the</strong><br />

commoditisation of news through <strong>the</strong><br />

proliferation of free sources of news and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> web were likely to spell a<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> newsletter publish<strong>in</strong>g. But this was<br />

not widely felt. Aga<strong>in</strong>st this, high value targeted<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation was still seen as greatly <strong>in</strong> demand,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> web and email as a more effective way<br />

of deliver<strong>in</strong>g it. There is also an expectation that<br />

as onl<strong>in</strong>e-only news and <strong>in</strong>formation services<br />

dw<strong>in</strong>dle, so will <strong>the</strong> free competition to paid<br />

content. But clearly, newsletters that fail to add<br />

significant value are at risk.<br />

The barriers to entry to newsletter publish<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

especially on <strong>the</strong> web and via email, are very<br />

low. The data below will not capture many of <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses, which may be very small <strong>in</strong>deed.<br />

Email market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> sale of lists, and<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g embedded with<strong>in</strong> email newsletters<br />

have been seen as one of <strong>the</strong> more effective<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, certa<strong>in</strong>ly compared<br />

with banner advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Many non-publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses are also us<strong>in</strong>g regular email<br />

newsletters as a means of client contact, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>se are not generally revenue-generat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves, but more a means of prompt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

site visits.<br />

59


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

9.4 Onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation vendors<br />

This segment of <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong>cludes both pure<br />

aggregators and <strong>the</strong> owners of content who also<br />

operate aggregation services distribut<strong>in</strong>g thirdparty<br />

content. The opportunities presented by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet more generally are presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g section.<br />

While <strong>the</strong>re are a lot of players <strong>in</strong> specific<br />

areas (e.g. Derwent for patents, Dun &<br />

Bradstreet for company <strong>in</strong>formation, Chemical<br />

Abstracts) <strong>the</strong>re has been a considerable<br />

concentration <strong>in</strong> this market <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last few<br />

years, with three major bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

vendors emerg<strong>in</strong>g: Thomson (which acquired<br />

Dialog), Reed Elsevier’s Lexis Nexis, and<br />

Factiva, which is a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture between<br />

Reuters and Dow Jones. In STM, <strong>the</strong> major<br />

players are Wolters Kluwer, Elsevier Science<br />

and Thomson, as well as John Wiley.<br />

One reason for actually nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se players<br />

is that o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong>re is a good deal of<br />

confusion about what constitutes this segment:<br />

after all, <strong>the</strong> vast majority of bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM<br />

publishers now operate onl<strong>in</strong>e services. These<br />

players tend to be dist<strong>in</strong>guished by size, global<br />

reach, and <strong>the</strong>ir role as <strong>in</strong>termediaries as well<br />

as content orig<strong>in</strong>ators. Their core competences<br />

of <strong>in</strong>formation handl<strong>in</strong>g, database management<br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration of technological functionality<br />

with content also mark <strong>the</strong>m out as be<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g edge of what is <strong>the</strong> future for much of<br />

<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole. They have<br />

also been <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forefront of try<strong>in</strong>g to forge close<br />

relationships with <strong>the</strong>ir end users. Some of<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, notably Factiva and Thomson, are also<br />

mov<strong>in</strong>g rapidly to becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

solutions companies, as are newer web-based<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>termediaries such as Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Table 9.8 European onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation market, £m, currrent prices<br />

2000 2001<br />

UK 283 297<br />

% share 39.4 38.9<br />

France 135 140<br />

% share 18.8 18.3<br />

Germany 122 137<br />

% share 17 17.9<br />

Scand<strong>in</strong>avia 57 61<br />

% share 8 8<br />

Italy 56 59<br />

% share 7.8 7.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 65 70<br />

% share 9 9.2<br />

Total 718 764<br />

Source The European Onl<strong>in</strong>e Information Market, Jan 2002, IRN<br />

for Learned Information<br />

Light. Thomson’s purchase of filter<strong>in</strong>g service<br />

NewsEdge is one <strong>in</strong>dication of this, while<br />

Factiva has developed its own software and<br />

tools for <strong>in</strong>formation management, which it is<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>g to client companies. Information<br />

vendors are mov<strong>in</strong>g away from <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess most <strong>in</strong> danger of impact from <strong>the</strong><br />

proliferation of free onl<strong>in</strong>e content <strong>in</strong>to higher<br />

value-added services. In a recent survey, 75%<br />

of bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation professionals reported<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g fee-based services less than before<br />

because of <strong>the</strong> availability of free <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> table 9.8 shows that <strong>the</strong> UK is <strong>the</strong><br />

largest market for onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

consumption <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> market for onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe amounted to £984m <strong>in</strong> 2001, up 6% on<br />

2000. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g legal,<br />

accounted for 77.6% and STM for <strong>the</strong> rest.<br />

60


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

10<br />

The Internet<br />

10.1 Opportunities and threats<br />

The advent of <strong>the</strong> World Wide Web runn<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet offered many opportunities and<br />

threats to <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. Because <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry was caught slightly off-guard, it was put<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a position of panic, respond<strong>in</strong>g to threats<br />

that arose from all corners of <strong>the</strong> globe, while<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g to generate revenues and profits similar<br />

to that from its traditional bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Luckily for<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> threat subsided for many<br />

reasons and most traditional publishers are now<br />

<strong>in</strong> a stronger position. What have been <strong>the</strong><br />

lessons learned and how should <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

proceed from here?<br />

The Internet is a daily part of most people’s<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g lives and has penetrated some 40% of<br />

our homes. The power of <strong>the</strong> World Wide Web<br />

is only just be<strong>in</strong>g realised and major<br />

developments will cont<strong>in</strong>ue for a considerable<br />

time to come. The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has<br />

almost entirely embraced <strong>the</strong> Web and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Internet protocols for market<strong>in</strong>g purposes and<br />

part of it has developed sophisticated new<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess models. As a market<strong>in</strong>g tool, <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet has proved very effective and a great<br />

help to smaller publishers <strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

markets.<br />

The web and o<strong>the</strong>r new services cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g new opportunities and new players to<br />

market. Many companies are f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves ‘publish<strong>in</strong>g’ on <strong>the</strong> Internet <strong>in</strong> new<br />

ways to reach <strong>the</strong>ir customers. Even <strong>the</strong><br />

Government has found itself more visibly<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g data and <strong>in</strong>formation. This may<br />

broaden <strong>the</strong> scope of publish<strong>in</strong>g, but does<br />

not redef<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. It provides publishers<br />

with an opportunity to exploit new revenue<br />

sources, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g professional services to<br />

companies and organisations whose focus<br />

needs to be elsewhere.<br />

The move towards gett<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g services<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> corporate world has been started and<br />

some major UK publishers, such as Pearson<br />

and Reed-Elsevier, have demonstrated an<br />

ability to service multiple markets us<strong>in</strong>g medianeutral<br />

content as well as gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

workflow of corporate customers. These most<br />

likely will be fur<strong>the</strong>r developed, although <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess models will need to be developed<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r and strategic alliances and partnerships<br />

may be needed.<br />

10.2 Newspapers<br />

National newspapers were among <strong>the</strong> first<br />

publishers to embrace <strong>the</strong> web. They have<br />

created a variety of onl<strong>in</strong>e services, some<br />

based around, but extend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted titles,<br />

such as FT.com, and o<strong>the</strong>rs built more around<br />

<strong>the</strong>matic areas, such as Associated<br />

Newspapers’ Femail, and thisismoney.co.uk.<br />

Some mass market newspapers have s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

significantly downgraded <strong>the</strong>ir Internet<br />

presence, such as Express Newspapers and<br />

<strong>the</strong> popular News International titles (former<br />

Express owners UNM and at one time, News<br />

International, were shareholders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ISP<br />

L<strong>in</strong>eOne, while The Sun also established<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n sold an Internet ISP and portal,<br />

entitled The Bun). Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror also had an<br />

ambitious national and local Internet strategy<br />

with ISP/portal ic24, which survives <strong>in</strong> its<br />

regional form.<br />

Regional newspapers have created sites<br />

around <strong>the</strong> geographical locations <strong>the</strong>y serve,<br />

and also <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as Newsquest’s<br />

Communigate, which acts as a host for<br />

community groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local area to have an<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e presence. Local shopp<strong>in</strong>g sites have<br />

also been launched, allow<strong>in</strong>g smaller local<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses (a pillar of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g base of<br />

<strong>the</strong> papers) to get onl<strong>in</strong>e under <strong>the</strong> auspices of<br />

<strong>the</strong> newspaper. Crucially, five of <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

groups also collaborated to establish a national<br />

classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g service, called Fish4. This<br />

has been important <strong>in</strong> defend<strong>in</strong>g newspapers’<br />

classified revenues, whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US <strong>the</strong><br />

major newspaper groups have failed to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

a workable co-operative model).<br />

10.3 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es have taken varied approaches to <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet. In <strong>the</strong> case of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, it was embraced as a major<br />

opportunity to extend <strong>the</strong> brands of <strong>the</strong><br />

62


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>to a new medium, someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that ran hand <strong>in</strong> hand with exist<strong>in</strong>g brand<br />

extensions, for example <strong>in</strong>to directories,<br />

exhibitions, conferences and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. For a<br />

time, it also presented threats <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of<br />

new, well-funded onl<strong>in</strong>e-only competitors, such<br />

as <strong>the</strong> B2B exchanges and so-called ‘vortals’<br />

which <strong>in</strong>tended to act as news and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

portals for vertical <strong>in</strong>dustries, with or without<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks to transactional services. This presented<br />

two threats: (<strong>the</strong>oretically) dis<strong>in</strong>termediation of<br />

directories and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and (actually) <strong>the</strong><br />

loss of skilled staff attracted by <strong>the</strong> promise of<br />

share options <strong>in</strong> dot.com bus<strong>in</strong>esses. A small<br />

specialist publisher told us:<br />

“The Internet is still <strong>the</strong>re as an opportunity.<br />

Three years ago we would have seen it as a<br />

huge threat. We faced serious challenges from<br />

well-funded new entrants. For a time we lost<br />

staff to dot.coms and it was a very competitive<br />

time for us. They had access to very cheap<br />

capital, but luckily <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess models ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

failed. Traditional publishers had to use cash<br />

flow to fund <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>itiatives. The staff issue was<br />

<strong>the</strong> biggest threat, but pushed us towards<br />

issu<strong>in</strong>g share options and mak<strong>in</strong>g bigger efforts<br />

to motivate staff, so <strong>in</strong> some ways it was good.”<br />

Clearly <strong>the</strong>se onl<strong>in</strong>e-only <strong>in</strong>itiatives have<br />

largely collapsed, although <strong>the</strong>re are legacies<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>in</strong>dustry-run B2B exchanges <strong>in</strong><br />

a number of <strong>in</strong>dustries. Many magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers had to <strong>in</strong>vest heavily <strong>in</strong> Internet<br />

services and <strong>the</strong> hoped-for revenue streams,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e advertis<strong>in</strong>g and even share of<br />

transactions (which sites like UBM’s Farmgate<br />

at one time anticipated) have not <strong>in</strong> general<br />

materialised. Lead<strong>in</strong>g B2B publishers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Emap, Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information and UBM are<br />

still deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> consequences, although all<br />

still see <strong>the</strong> Internet as an important channel of<br />

communication with <strong>the</strong> customer and as a<br />

potential revenue earner, particularly through<br />

added-value niche bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

services. One publisher told us:<br />

“All of us are clear<strong>in</strong>g up after <strong>the</strong> big party.<br />

We are cutt<strong>in</strong>g back to <strong>the</strong> core bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to work out what to do about <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>g. There is not much growth out <strong>the</strong>re<br />

and we mostly went up a bl<strong>in</strong>d alley with onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

There will be more consolidation and more<br />

cost cutt<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r commented:<br />

“We have fewer companion websites than we<br />

did. The means of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ad revenue onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

have not proved effective. Banners, buttons,<br />

etc, are too <strong>in</strong>trusive, like ads on teletext, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

get <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way of what <strong>the</strong> user is <strong>the</strong>re for.<br />

Revenue has to be based on subscriptions, and<br />

that means hav<strong>in</strong>g high value content that<br />

extends beyond <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>e. One<br />

paid service that we have launched has had<br />

high take up. It’s not just updates on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t –<br />

it’s high value new bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation.”<br />

10.4 Consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

The picture here is aga<strong>in</strong> diverse. Some of <strong>the</strong><br />

biggest publishers, such as IPC, launched major<br />

web <strong>in</strong>itiatives, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> general lifestyle area<br />

with women’s sites (BeMe) and men’s sites<br />

(Uploaded) and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

focused area, with acclaimed sites such as <strong>the</strong><br />

New Scientist’s. In <strong>the</strong> heavily contested music<br />

and travel segments magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers aga<strong>in</strong><br />

faced onl<strong>in</strong>e-only competition (or <strong>in</strong> some cases,<br />

outlets for content) <strong>in</strong> all k<strong>in</strong>ds of forms, as sites<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>g MP3 files and fan sites mushroomed,<br />

and travel <strong>in</strong>termediaries with content and news<br />

were major areas for web <strong>in</strong>vestment. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

publishers refra<strong>in</strong>ed from mak<strong>in</strong>g big<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments and largely conf<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>mselves to<br />

reproduc<strong>in</strong>g covers of <strong>the</strong> latest issues and<br />

hav<strong>in</strong>g subscription <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> web.<br />

Leav<strong>in</strong>g content aside for a moment, it is also<br />

clear that <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e channel represents a<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite opportunity to <strong>in</strong>crease subscriptions<br />

to pr<strong>in</strong>t products, to ease <strong>the</strong> crucial process<br />

of renewal and to transfer some of <strong>the</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration of subscriptions to <strong>the</strong> consumer.<br />

There is considerable evidence from <strong>the</strong> US to<br />

support this, although of course, subscriptions<br />

are a much higher proportion of sales <strong>the</strong>re than<br />

here. A British publisher, Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, has<br />

also had considerable success <strong>in</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

subscriptions to <strong>the</strong> US edition of Maxim via ><br />

63


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet. For a fuller discussion of<br />

subscriptions, see <strong>the</strong> customer focus section.<br />

In common with mass market newspapers,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re has been a retreat from <strong>the</strong> Web on <strong>the</strong><br />

part of consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers, with<br />

high-profile sites be<strong>in</strong>g closed or sold.<br />

One publisher of specialist titles told us:<br />

“The Internet should be an opportunity for some<br />

specialised titles, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for commerce and<br />

classifieds, e.g. travel and books, but it’s tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a long time to take off. It is quite hard to<br />

monetise it. For most <strong>in</strong>terests, <strong>the</strong>re is a natural<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e community, but <strong>the</strong>re’s masses<br />

of stuff available on <strong>the</strong> Web from libraries,<br />

universities, etc. The danger is that your site<br />

just becomes a signpost. No-one is spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

any money at any po<strong>in</strong>t, so how can you get<br />

a share of it?”<br />

By contrast, a publisher of magaz<strong>in</strong>es aimed<br />

at car buyers and male electronics purchasers<br />

told us that <strong>the</strong> Internet:<br />

“Is very significant for us. One of our sites is<br />

profitable on <strong>the</strong> basis of sell<strong>in</strong>g display<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g content from it on to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r sites. It also generates pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

subscriptions.”<br />

A report by consultants McK<strong>in</strong>sey, published<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> McK<strong>in</strong>sey Quarterly 1st Quarter 2001,<br />

summed up <strong>the</strong> dilemma fac<strong>in</strong>g many magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers:<br />

“Many magaz<strong>in</strong>es fall between <strong>the</strong> available<br />

choices: <strong>the</strong>y spend a lot of money build<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

complete website and end up with one too<br />

costly to be a companion site but not compell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

enough to attract <strong>the</strong> high traffic and revenue of<br />

a dest<strong>in</strong>ation site. Resources are wasted, and<br />

readers are unhappy; people who are<br />

passionate about <strong>the</strong>ir magaz<strong>in</strong>es expect <strong>the</strong><br />

Web version to be as good as its pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

counterpart, and if a site billed as a dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

experience fails to live up to those expectations,<br />

<strong>the</strong> chances of success fall and <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

risks los<strong>in</strong>g valuable pr<strong>in</strong>t subscribers.”<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> same arguments apply to<br />

so-called ‘mas<strong>the</strong>ad’ programm<strong>in</strong>g, that is,<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e-branded television programm<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

discussed below.<br />

Recently, mobile has emerged as an<br />

important platform/threat for teen magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

with text messag<strong>in</strong>g absorb<strong>in</strong>g ever <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

amounts of time and money <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> teen and<br />

even pre-teen age groups.<br />

10.5 Books<br />

As has already been mentioned, <strong>the</strong>re are a<br />

number of ways <strong>in</strong> which book publishers have<br />

embraced <strong>the</strong> Internet. For academic and STM<br />

publishers it has become fundamental. It is a<br />

major opportunity for <strong>the</strong>m to create arrays of<br />

new services that meet <strong>the</strong> demands of<br />

academic, research and library users. One<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g academic publisher told us:<br />

“I am a big believer <strong>in</strong> server-side e-books<br />

(NetLibrary, ebrary, 24 by 7, etc). The ability to<br />

search across <strong>the</strong> field and cross-refer is what<br />

libraries want and what users want. But <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess model’s still unclear – many pioneers<br />

have gone bust.”<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>t on demand is also a big opportunity,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> this segment, as it allows<br />

publishers to keep books <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t that would<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise be uneconomic. However, <strong>the</strong> need<br />

to clear third party rights before us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

content <strong>in</strong> this manner was described to us as<br />

“a potential show-stopper”. Of course, as time<br />

goes on, publishers will be secur<strong>in</strong>g rights to<br />

use content <strong>in</strong> this way – or at least attempt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to do so.<br />

64


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

11<br />

Analysis of gaps <strong>in</strong> data sources<br />

11.1 General comments<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> analysis of methodological issues,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> identified need to measure productivity<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector, <strong>the</strong> most serious gaps <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

data are for total turnover and value-added, and<br />

agreed estimates of global employment with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sector and sub-sectors, which would allow<br />

some calculation of sales or value-added per<br />

employee. An additional severe gap is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

number of companies operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

and sub-sectors, for which estimates vary<br />

extremely widely. This variable (and accurate<br />

size distribution <strong>in</strong>formation) is crucial to <strong>the</strong><br />

ability to conduct statistically valid surveys.<br />

11.2 Official versus unofficial statistics<br />

It is notable that <strong>the</strong> official statistics do attempt<br />

to measure <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d of variables that are useful<br />

for analys<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness, but <strong>the</strong> problem<br />

with <strong>the</strong>se is that <strong>the</strong>y do not def<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> a way that encompasses all <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

activities, and sub-sectors are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ways<br />

that amalgamate activities that are subject to<br />

different market dynamics. Some of <strong>the</strong> subsectors,<br />

notably newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g, are fairly<br />

well def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> official data and <strong>the</strong>refore it<br />

is possible to use <strong>the</strong> official data for some<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators. It will be necessary to rely on<br />

aggregated 2-digit official data (publish<strong>in</strong>g as a<br />

whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SIC def<strong>in</strong>ition) to some extent. This<br />

is <strong>in</strong> spite of <strong>the</strong> fact that it does not fully match<br />

<strong>the</strong> activity def<strong>in</strong>ition – for example, activities<br />

such as exhibitions and conferences,<br />

databases, news agencies and ‘advertis<strong>in</strong>grelated<br />

activities’ are scattered throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

Standard Industrial Classification – simply<br />

because <strong>the</strong>re isn’t anyth<strong>in</strong>g else available. It<br />

has <strong>the</strong> advantage of hav<strong>in</strong>g long consistent<br />

series properly collected on a sound<br />

methodological basis.<br />

Many variables are also available at <strong>the</strong><br />

4-digit level, which will cover book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g quite well, but <strong>the</strong><br />

third category, which encompasses ‘journal and<br />

periodical publish<strong>in</strong>g’, is much less satisfactorily<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s po<strong>in</strong>t of view.<br />

The unofficial statistics tend to be strong <strong>in</strong><br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g variables that help companies to<br />

measure <strong>the</strong>ir market share, or <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

of particular media aga<strong>in</strong>st o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sales revenue, number of titles,<br />

and circulation. Even here <strong>the</strong>re are problems<br />

of coverage, especially <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> sub-sectors,<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess press.<br />

11.3 Sub-sectors<br />

11.3.1 Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Huge variation <strong>in</strong> estimates of <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

publishers with a 10-fold difference <strong>in</strong> official<br />

data and unofficial estimates.<br />

• Problems with employment data. No regular<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry source and data from <strong>the</strong> Labour<br />

Force Survey differs substantially from <strong>the</strong><br />

AES data. This limits <strong>the</strong> possibility of<br />

calculat<strong>in</strong>g productivity measures with any<br />

degree of confidence.<br />

• Sales revenue – unofficial data is improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

but it is necessary to use PRODCOM data<br />

until this becomes available.<br />

• No regular data concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> level of stock<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>. There is a one-off figure <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> KPMG report ‘Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />

Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize’.<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ancial data e.g. return on sales. There is<br />

some partial data based on <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

report<strong>in</strong>g firms.<br />

• As already noted, <strong>the</strong> trade data does not fully<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> globalised nature of <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

• A critical gap is <strong>the</strong> lack of data on revenues<br />

from licens<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> sale of rights, which is<br />

an extremely important element <strong>in</strong> book<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />

In general, <strong>the</strong>re is a lot of data which<br />

companies use <strong>in</strong>ternally to measure <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

performance, but which is not publicly available<br />

for analysis, <strong>in</strong> some cases because it is<br />

regarded as confidential.<br />

11.3.2 Newspaper publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Official data maps reasonably well onto<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector, so <strong>the</strong>re are fewer gaps than <strong>in</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r areas.<br />

• But <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions of newspapers and journals<br />

66


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

and periodicals used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> official statistics<br />

splits <strong>the</strong> sector <strong>in</strong> a way that does not reflect<br />

<strong>the</strong> split between nationals and regionals,<br />

which is quite crucial <strong>in</strong> some respects. For<br />

this, unofficial data is necessary and here<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are gaps, notably <strong>in</strong> terms of reliable<br />

employment data.<br />

11.3.3 Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• No regular updated employment data.<br />

• No agreed and cont<strong>in</strong>uously collected data<br />

on <strong>the</strong> number of publishers – large tail of<br />

small publishers <strong>in</strong> consumer, one-off data<br />

for bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

• Official data comb<strong>in</strong>es journals and periodicals<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some newspapers) toge<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

does not dist<strong>in</strong>guish consumer from bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g, which have<br />

very different dynamics and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />

These are becom<strong>in</strong>g more pronounced ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than less as <strong>the</strong>y grasp <strong>the</strong> opportunities<br />

presented by digital media. For example, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is no regular data captur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

important brand extension activities of B2B<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers.<br />

• Sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue figures are<br />

reliable for consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es but much<br />

less is available for bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

periodicals. For example, no net revenue<br />

data is calculated.<br />

11.3.4 Journal publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• The Publishers Association (PA) and <strong>the</strong><br />

Association of Learned and Professional<br />

Society Publishers have both carried out<br />

surveys <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past, and are collaborat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

produce decent <strong>in</strong>formation, but this has been<br />

hampered by <strong>the</strong> unwill<strong>in</strong>gness of <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

publishers to respond to surveys.<br />

• Official data comb<strong>in</strong>es journals and<br />

periodicals.<br />

11.3.5 Database and directory publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• There is a small amount of snapshot<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation available from <strong>the</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Information Forum’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

study and from a regular survey carried out for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Database Publishers’ Association by<br />

K<strong>in</strong>gston University.<br />

• There is a series of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue data<br />

compiled by <strong>the</strong> Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association.<br />

11.3.6 Newsletters<br />

• The only data is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> BIF’s Connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess study.<br />

><br />

67


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

11.4 Summary of def<strong>in</strong>itional issues and data gaps<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Newspapers<br />

Books<br />

Journals<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>itional issues<br />

Official data covers<br />

books, newspapers,<br />

journals and periodicals<br />

and some ‘o<strong>the</strong>r’<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g but not<br />

databases, news<br />

agencies, list rental,<br />

exhibitions, etc. No<br />

satisfactory def<strong>in</strong>ition yet<br />

exists – key requirement.<br />

For some purposes and<br />

at an <strong>in</strong>ternational (e.g.<br />

EU and OECD) level,<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g is still<br />

amalgamated with<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and even wood<br />

pulp and paper mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Official data splits<br />

newspapers on basis of<br />

frequency of publication<br />

<strong>in</strong>to newspapers and<br />

journals and periodicals;<br />

unofficial data splits by<br />

national and regional<br />

No major def<strong>in</strong>itional<br />

problems – though it can<br />

be difficult to weed out<br />

self-publishers and s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

book publishers, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to wide variations <strong>in</strong><br />

enterprise numbers.<br />

E-books, fragmentation of<br />

'<strong>the</strong> book' and Pr<strong>in</strong>t on<br />

Demand may <strong>in</strong> future<br />

throw up quantitative<br />

issues<br />

Official data merges all<br />

journals and periodicals<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r. Global nature of<br />

academic/STM bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

means it's important to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish UK revenues,<br />

worldwide revenues of<br />

UK based publishers etc.<br />

New electronic products<br />

and aggregators need to<br />

be accommodated <strong>in</strong><br />

def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

Number of enterprises<br />

Official data agreed to be<br />

an underestimate<br />

Comparatively high<br />

concentration makes<br />

'universe' calculable for<br />

survey purposes. Good<br />

unofficial data<br />

No agreed data – official<br />

numbers c. 3000,<br />

unofficial 30,000-40,000<br />

Unofficial data on UK<br />

based publishers, but<br />

quite high range of<br />

numbers<br />

Turnover and net<br />

revenues<br />

No agreed total – official<br />

underestimates<br />

Both official and unofficial<br />

data exists<br />

Both official and unofficial<br />

data exists; unofficial data<br />

is improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Unofficial annual survey<br />

data; problems of nonresponse/<br />

unrepresentativeness<br />

Value added<br />

No agreed total – official<br />

underestimates<br />

Official data exists s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1993 but with gaps<br />

Official data exists s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1993<br />

No separate data<br />

Employment<br />

Labour Force Survey<br />

data likely to be closer to<br />

reality as it is self-def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by employee, but<br />

freelanc<strong>in</strong>g an issue<br />

Labour Force Survey<br />

data covers whole<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry but very small<br />

sample size makes for<br />

high variability from year<br />

to year<br />

Labour Force Survey<br />

data covers whole<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry but very small<br />

sample size makes for<br />

high variability from year<br />

to year<br />

No separate data<br />

Exports<br />

Need agreement on how<br />

to represent globalised<br />

nature of book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quantitatively<br />

Need agreement on how<br />

to represent globalised<br />

nature of journal<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g quantitatively<br />

Rights and licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>come<br />

Some data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> balance<br />

of trade <strong>in</strong> services<br />

No data<br />

No data – very significant<br />

gap<br />

Some data<br />

Investment<br />

Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

exists but what is really<br />

needed is a measure of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

property<br />

Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

exists but what is really<br />

needed is a measure of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

property<br />

Capital spend<strong>in</strong>g data<br />

exists but what is really<br />

needed is a measure of<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

property<br />

No separate dat<br />

Entrepreneurship<br />

Entry and exit rates <strong>in</strong><br />

Annual Respondents<br />

Database but publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

merged with pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Innovation<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded with<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and paper <strong>in</strong><br />

Community Innovation<br />

Survey<br />

Proxy: Number of new<br />

titles data<br />

Proxy: number of new<br />

titles data<br />

Proxy: number of new<br />

journals launched<br />

Environmental/<br />

wastage <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

No overall data<br />

No aggregate data<br />

Survey data on returns<br />

and estimates of pulp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– not regular<br />

No data<br />

68


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Directories<br />

Newsletters<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>itional issues<br />

Official data merges all<br />

journals and periodicals<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r. Also no split<br />

between consumer and<br />

B2B<br />

Official data merges all<br />

journals and periodicals<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r. Also no split<br />

between consumer and<br />

B2B. How ancillary<br />

revenues e.g.<br />

conferences, databases<br />

etc, be accounted for <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> official def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g overlap with<br />

databases, some titles<br />

exist <strong>in</strong> electronic form<br />

only and this will <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

over time<br />

Many titles exist <strong>in</strong><br />

electronic form only and<br />

this will <strong>in</strong>crease over<br />

time. Low barriers to<br />

entry to email newsletters<br />

imply large number of<br />

small or microenterprises<br />

not captured<br />

<strong>in</strong> statistics<br />

Number of enterprises<br />

No agreed dat<br />

No agreed data<br />

Unofficial data<br />

No agreed data<br />

Turnover and net<br />

revenues<br />

Unofficial data on gross<br />

and net revenues<br />

Unofficial regular data on<br />

gross advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

revenue only, one-off<br />

survey data on total<br />

revenues<br />

Unofficial annual survey<br />

data; problems of nonresponse/unrepresentativ<br />

eness<br />

One off unofficial B2B<br />

survey data<br />

Value added<br />

No separate data<br />

No separate data<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Employment<br />

No separate data<br />

No separate data<br />

Annual survey data on<br />

number of employees<br />

per firm but can't be<br />

grossed up<br />

One off unofficial B2B<br />

survey data<br />

Exports<br />

Some unofficial data on<br />

percentage of sales<br />

Some unofficial data on<br />

percentage of sale<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Rights and licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>come<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Some survey data on<br />

ancillary revenues<br />

No data<br />

Investment<br />

No separate data<br />

No separate data<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Entrepreneurship<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Innovation<br />

Proxy: new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

launches<br />

Proxy: new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

launches<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

Environmental/<br />

wastage <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

Source Pira<br />

Unofficial data – needs<br />

careful <strong>in</strong>terpretation to<br />

adjust for changed<br />

retail<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

Very difficult – no returns<br />

on free magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

No data<br />

No data<br />

69


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

12<br />

Typology of publish<strong>in</strong>g products accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to brand and format characteristics<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g on from <strong>the</strong> discussion on brand<br />

extension <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sections on consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess media,<br />

and look<strong>in</strong>g forward to <strong>the</strong> discussion on <strong>the</strong><br />

challenge of digital media <strong>in</strong> Chapter 17, we<br />

have drawn up a typology of pr<strong>in</strong>ted media<br />

products. This attempts to place different media<br />

products accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir brand strength and<br />

<strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong>y are format-neutral.<br />

12.1 Brand<br />

Brand becomes ever more important <strong>in</strong> a<br />

fragmented digital environment as a marker for<br />

users to f<strong>in</strong>d content <strong>the</strong>y can trust and want to<br />

use (and may pay for). It is also important to<br />

protect brands <strong>in</strong> environments where content<br />

is passed though new <strong>in</strong>termediaries and<br />

aggregators and to guard aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

commoditisation of content.<br />

12.2 Importance of format<br />

Format-neutrality is an <strong>in</strong>dicator of how far and<br />

fast different products will tend to move <strong>in</strong>to<br />

multiple channels and platforms. For some<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted products, <strong>the</strong> format <strong>the</strong>y appear <strong>in</strong> is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to <strong>the</strong>ir appeal, e.g. portability,<br />

disposability, <strong>the</strong> ability to cut pictures out, or<br />

share <strong>the</strong> product with o<strong>the</strong>rs easily. With<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> content itself is <strong>the</strong> primary sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t and its separation from <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />

format may enhance its functionality. Some<br />

products will be equally useful <strong>in</strong> different<br />

formats, depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>ir mode of use, e.g.<br />

used <strong>in</strong> one form while <strong>the</strong> reader is on <strong>the</strong><br />

move, and ano<strong>the</strong>r when <strong>the</strong>y are at <strong>the</strong>ir desks<br />

or at home.<br />

The products are categorised by end-user:<br />

consumer, bus<strong>in</strong>ess, and <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

(education/research).<br />

12.3 Consumer media<br />

Medium<br />

Book<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Broadsheets<br />

Mass market<br />

Regional and local<br />

newspapers<br />

Directories<br />

(e.g. Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s)<br />

Exhibitions and events<br />

Format characteristics<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal – at least until usability<br />

issues are resolved with screens and through<br />

generational change. Possible exceptions: reference<br />

works, travel guides and <strong>the</strong> like<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal, especially for glossies and<br />

teen/women’s weeklies. TV list<strong>in</strong>gs as well, although<br />

<strong>the</strong>y face migration to/competition from EPGs. Some<br />

buyer’s guide-type consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es are more<br />

format-neutral (PCs, cars, etc)<br />

Format somewhat neutral, but paper still <strong>the</strong><br />

fundamental format<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; but classifieds ga<strong>in</strong><br />

enormously <strong>in</strong> functionality from onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Format fluid. Paper products likely to persist for a<br />

long time as <strong>the</strong>y constitute a barrier to entry and<br />

many users prefer paper. Electronic confers greater<br />

functionality/updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; be<strong>in</strong>g present is <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t, although onl<strong>in</strong>e can be complementary <strong>in</strong><br />

publicis<strong>in</strong>g/ prepar<strong>in</strong>g events<br />

Brand characteristics<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ly resides with author; longevity varies. Where<br />

brand resides with impr<strong>in</strong>t or publisher, it is long lived<br />

Strong brands but may be relatively short-lived;<br />

some ephemeral (resembles FMCG); brand<br />

extension limited<br />

Strong, long-lived brands. Some opportunity to create<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked, differentiat<strong>in</strong>g brands through <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

media<br />

Strong long lived brands; brand extension limited<br />

Most strong and long lived but advertisement-only<br />

papers can be weak and ephemeral. Opportunity to<br />

create l<strong>in</strong>ked but differentiat<strong>in</strong>g brands (e.g. thisis)<br />

Often very strong. Yellow <strong>Page</strong>s a generic brand as<br />

well as an actual one<br />

Some strong and long lived; o<strong>the</strong>rs weak and<br />

ephemeral<br />

70


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

12.4 Bus<strong>in</strong>ess media<br />

Medium<br />

Newspapers<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Newsletters<br />

Directories<br />

Exhibitions,<br />

conferences, events<br />

Databases, onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation services<br />

Format characteristics<br />

Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Functionality can be<br />

different but equal <strong>in</strong> paper and o<strong>the</strong>r formats<br />

Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats can add<br />

functionality especially where magaz<strong>in</strong>e is used for<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g/archive, etc. Nonpaper<br />

formats allow for updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats can add<br />

functionality especially for <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g/archive, etc. Non-paper formats allow for<br />

updat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Fluid: content is <strong>the</strong> USP. Non-paper formats have<br />

more functionality and are easily updated. Although<br />

some users will prefer paper, this will change over<br />

time. Paper likely to disappear<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; many are products of<br />

brand extension. Onl<strong>in</strong>e events lack network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

opportunities, although onl<strong>in</strong>e can be complementary<br />

<strong>in</strong> publicis<strong>in</strong>g/ prepar<strong>in</strong>g events<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal – important to <strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong><br />

technology and functionality constantly<br />

Brand characteristics<br />

Strong, long-lived<br />

Many are strong and long-lived but niches can be<br />

quickly overpopulated and <strong>the</strong> weak go to <strong>the</strong> wall<br />

Tend to be short lived<br />

Some long lived and strong; o<strong>the</strong>rs weak and<br />

ephemeral<br />

Fairly weak <strong>in</strong> many cases, although some exhibitions<br />

and events have extremely strong brands and are<br />

very long-lived<br />

Varies – e.g. Lexis, Reuters strong<br />

Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Books (management,<br />

professional)<br />

Multi-format – USP is cost-effectiveness<br />

Format <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to appeal; added value services<br />

possible<br />

Highly variable<br />

Brand resides ma<strong>in</strong>ly with impr<strong>in</strong>t, occasionally with<br />

author<br />

12.5 Education and research market<br />

Medium<br />

Monograph<br />

Textbook<br />

Journal<br />

Format characteristics<br />

Content is ma<strong>in</strong> USP, though paper format may<br />

persist due to mode of use/portability. Usability issues<br />

have to be resolved (e-book readers, etc)<br />

Content is ma<strong>in</strong> USP: electronic formats can add<br />

functionality and updatability, but usability issues<br />

have to be resolved (e-book readers, etc)<br />

Content is USP. Electronic formats can add to<br />

functionality<br />

Brand characteristics<br />

Brand resides with author and impr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Brand resides with impr<strong>in</strong>t and sometimes author<br />

Brand resides with journal; publisher has brand if<br />

title belongs to <strong>the</strong>m but may belong to society or<br />

rarely, editorial board. Some danger of brand loss<br />

<strong>in</strong> aggregation services – author could become<br />

<strong>the</strong> brand<br />

71


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

13<br />

Strengths, weaknesses,<br />

opportunities and threats<br />

13.1 Introduction<br />

This section, analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> strengths,<br />

weaknesses and constra<strong>in</strong>ts, opportunities and<br />

threats fac<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g and its constituent<br />

parts, is based on our research, <strong>the</strong><br />

questionnaire responses, and <strong>in</strong>put from<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry representatives <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews and focus group meet<strong>in</strong>gs. Ultimately,<br />

it is a product of Pira’s judgement.<br />

This SWOT analysis po<strong>in</strong>ts forwards to our<br />

deeper analysis of <strong>the</strong> challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 2, and to <strong>the</strong> Action<br />

Plan. However, not all of <strong>the</strong> identified<br />

weaknesses and threats, nor for that matter <strong>the</strong><br />

opportunities, will necessarily have an action<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t specifically attached to it – some action<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts, for example those concerned with <strong>the</strong><br />

adoption of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies, may<br />

address a whole series of <strong>the</strong> weaknesses<br />

and threats.<br />

The analysis has been made for sub-sectors<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, but <strong>the</strong>re is also an <strong>in</strong>troductory<br />

section which draws toge<strong>the</strong>r common factors<br />

across publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

13.2 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> – common strengths<br />

and issues<br />

Strengths<br />

• Use of English language <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

• Highly qualified workforce<br />

• Core competences <strong>in</strong> selection, edit<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and manipulation of <strong>in</strong>formation are<br />

extremely valuable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new knowledgebased<br />

economy<br />

• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

• Brands<br />

• Self regulatory regimes <strong>in</strong> place <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g, content and distribution<br />

(ASA,PCC,JIG)<br />

Weaknesses and constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

• Lack of sufficiently close knowledge or<br />

relationship with end customer<br />

• Uneven adoption of vital underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technologies to take advantage of<br />

opportunities<br />

• Competition laws and cross-media ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts limit scale<br />

• Mature markets for pr<strong>in</strong>t products<br />

• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share of consumer time spent on<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t products<br />

• Lack of comprehensive statistics to assess<br />

performance<br />

• Lack of public profile as an <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

• Confused copyright licens<strong>in</strong>g structure<br />

• English language makes UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vulnerable<br />

Threats<br />

• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation/re<strong>in</strong>termediation by nontraditional<br />

‘publishers’ and o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>terpos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

between publishers and <strong>the</strong>ir customers<br />

• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Commoditisation of some content<br />

• Skill shortages<br />

• Increased demands on consumers’ time and<br />

attention<br />

• Regulation of content and privacy laws<br />

• Competition from publicly funded bodies such<br />

as <strong>the</strong> BBC can stifle new markets<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Closer relationship with customers<br />

• Use of data about customers and relationships<br />

with <strong>the</strong>m to buttress advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and<br />

allow <strong>the</strong> creation of new and customised<br />

products and services<br />

• New services based on new non-pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

platforms and on digital pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g/pr<strong>in</strong>t on<br />

demand<br />

• Use of enabl<strong>in</strong>g e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong><br />

production/supply cha<strong>in</strong>/sales and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g/content management<br />

• International markets driven by use of English<br />

and empowered by new technologies<br />

72


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 13.1 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: perceived opportunities and threats<br />

over three and 10 years<br />

Opportunities<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />

overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />

create new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Threats<br />

Economic recession<br />

Technological change e.g. development of<br />

broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

Retention of rights by authors/<br />

agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

New entrants to your market<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong><br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Stricter regulation<br />

Taxation changes<br />

Source Pira survey<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

provider/publisher<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

><br />

73


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

13.3 Books<br />

Strengths<br />

• Use of English language <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

• Established companies with <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

networks<br />

• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

• Strengths <strong>in</strong> diverse sectors<br />

• Ability to source books from many different<br />

countries<br />

• High rate of title generation (see weaknesses)<br />

• Competitive pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Increas<strong>in</strong>gly educated population<br />

• Popularity of read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• More outlets for book sales – related to<br />

discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Highly attractive occupation to graduates<br />

• Relatively strong export performance,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> ELT<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />

• Complexity of supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Low brand strength – brand resides ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

with authors (some impr<strong>in</strong>ts and series<br />

excepted)<br />

• Fragmented<br />

• No direct contact with end customer (except<br />

book clubs)<br />

• Publishers push out titles ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

focused on sell<strong>in</strong>g – cha<strong>in</strong> is too supply driven<br />

not demand driven<br />

• More demands on consumers' time<br />

• Level of returns – but not high relative to US<br />

• Long tail of publishers slow to take up<br />

technological <strong>in</strong>novations<br />

• Low pay – strength if susta<strong>in</strong>able?<br />

• Talent gap at middle level emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Low spend<strong>in</strong>g on books <strong>in</strong> education<br />

• Low spend<strong>in</strong>g on books <strong>in</strong> public libraries,<br />

especially fiction<br />

• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement on <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

• Agents and authors reta<strong>in</strong> more rights <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to segment <strong>the</strong>m fur<strong>the</strong>r – may limit ability to<br />

<strong>in</strong>novate <strong>in</strong> new platforms<br />

• Power of bestsell<strong>in</strong>g authors to dis<strong>in</strong>termediate<br />

• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Proliferation of leisure activities and media<br />

• Concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g/entry of US super<br />

retailers<br />

• Chang<strong>in</strong>g female aspirations and ambitions<br />

may reduce supply of graduates<br />

• End of <strong>the</strong> book writ<strong>in</strong>g culture (academic<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g only)<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Market dom<strong>in</strong>ated by heavy buyers/readers<br />

– only need to grow <strong>the</strong> market by a small<br />

marg<strong>in</strong> to get successful growth<br />

• Pr<strong>in</strong>t on demand – keeps books <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t, and<br />

as <strong>the</strong> title proliferation is ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong><br />

academic/niche/professional it allows<br />

publishers to make sales without carry<strong>in</strong>g cost<br />

• Internet booksellers allow much more<br />

exposure and sale of <strong>the</strong> backlist<br />

• Expand<strong>in</strong>g markets overseas due ma<strong>in</strong>ly to<br />

spread of English language<br />

• Tie-<strong>in</strong> opportunities aris<strong>in</strong>g from new leisure<br />

pursuits<br />

• E-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production<br />

process to drive efficiency/cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

underp<strong>in</strong> reuse of content across platforms<br />

• E-commerce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> to drive<br />

efficiencies/reduce costs<br />

• Closer relationship with customers, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CRM-type technologies<br />

• More exploitation of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights and<br />

ensur<strong>in</strong>g that ‘new’ rights are secured<br />

and used<br />

• E-books <strong>in</strong> some segments<br />

Threats<br />

• Erosion of territorial rights <strong>in</strong>creases threat of<br />

US competition<br />

• Piracy<br />

74


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 13.2 Books: perceived opportunities and threats<br />

over three and 10 years<br />

Opportunities<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />

overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />

new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Threats<br />

Economic recession<br />

Technological change e.g. development of<br />

broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

New entrants to your market<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Stricter regulation<br />

Taxation changes<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Source Pira survey<br />

><br />

75


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

13.4 Journals<br />

Strengths<br />

• Subscription bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />

• At forefront of technological developments<br />

• No taxation of <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

• English language – for content sourc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

sales<br />

• Science and research base<br />

• Brand resides <strong>in</strong> journal (strength if owned)<br />

• Ability to cross-promote from one journal to<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

• Direct relationships with subscribers <strong>in</strong><br />

many cases<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />

• Inadequate fund<strong>in</strong>g of higher education and<br />

research<br />

• Inadequate fund<strong>in</strong>g of academic libraries<br />

• Brand resides <strong>in</strong> journal (weakness if owned<br />

by <strong>in</strong>stitution or society)<br />

• Hard to launch new titles – need to persuade<br />

customers to drop one to make room<br />

Threats<br />

• Copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by academics publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

direct <strong>in</strong> electronic journals<br />

• New <strong>in</strong>termediaries may <strong>in</strong>terpose between<br />

publishers and customers and command <strong>the</strong><br />

customer relationship and customer data<br />

• Inequitable taxation of electronic content and<br />

migration of activity to US<br />

• Cost of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g digital<br />

archive<br />

• Power of library customers<br />

• Electronic Inter-Library Loan<br />

• Dissolution of <strong>the</strong> journal as a package of<br />

articles – pay per item becomes prevalent<br />

(could also be an opportunity)<br />

• Concentration of ownership allows big players<br />

to squeeze out smaller ones through bundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r practices<br />

• Big players cause resentment among authors<br />

and customers<br />

• More aggressive use of patents limits content<br />

availability<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Electronic distribution br<strong>in</strong>gs down costs<br />

• New service offer<strong>in</strong>gs possible based on<br />

closer relationship with customer and new<br />

technologies<br />

• Dissolution of <strong>the</strong> journal as a package of<br />

articles – pay per item becomes prevalent<br />

• New fields of study open up and high degree<br />

of academic specialisation creates new journal<br />

possibilities (but difficult to sell without<br />

knock<strong>in</strong>g out ano<strong>the</strong>r title – budget constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />

power of library <strong>in</strong>termediaries)<br />

• Alliances between publishers and universities<br />

to create e-learn<strong>in</strong>g platforms<br />

76


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 13.3 Journals: perceived opportunities and threats<br />

over three and 10 years<br />

Opportunities<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />

overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />

new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Threats<br />

Economic recession<br />

Technological change eg development of<br />

broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

New entrants to your market<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Stricter regulation<br />

Taxation changes<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

Source Pira survey<br />

><br />

77


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

13.5 Newspapers<br />

Strengths<br />

• Strong brands<br />

• High reach<br />

• Authoritative content (qualities)<br />

• Established distribution channels<br />

• No tax on <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

• Strong newstrade distribution reduces costs of<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g customers (compared with overseas<br />

counterparts)<br />

• Relationships with advertisers<br />

• Trust (regional and local)<br />

• Role of papers with<strong>in</strong> economy and society<br />

well established and understood<br />

• National daily papers are ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>sulated<br />

from <strong>in</strong>ternational competition<br />

• Many local papers do not compete directly<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> same market<br />

• Ad sales force has unparalleled local<br />

relationships with bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

• Portability<br />

• Competitive price<br />

• Low staff turnover<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />

• Mature market<br />

• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g circulation<br />

• Special competition regime on mergers and<br />

acquisitions limits ability to respond quickly to<br />

deal opportunities<br />

• Cross media ownership constra<strong>in</strong>ts limits scale<br />

and cross-platform exploitation of assets<br />

compared with books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

• High cost of production and distribution for<br />

physical product<br />

• EU employment and work<strong>in</strong>g time regulations<br />

make it more difficult to recruit and reta<strong>in</strong><br />

delivery workers<br />

• Greater reliance on advertis<strong>in</strong>g than a decade<br />

ago, especially recruitment advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Threats<br />

• Newspaper read<strong>in</strong>g habit dy<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong> younger<br />

generations<br />

• Grow<strong>in</strong>g competition for readers’ attention<br />

• Grow<strong>in</strong>g competition for advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g may migrate to Internet<br />

rivals or be dis<strong>in</strong>termediated i.e. advertisers<br />

separately or <strong>in</strong> groups reach customers<br />

directly via onl<strong>in</strong>e or o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>teractive media<br />

• Inequitable taxation of electronic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Public sector recruitment direct via Internet<br />

• Onl<strong>in</strong>e media br<strong>in</strong>gs o<strong>the</strong>r sources of news to<br />

consumers<br />

• News becom<strong>in</strong>g a commodity<br />

• Advertisers may cont<strong>in</strong>ue to shift budgets<br />

towards below <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e campaigns<br />

• Privacy laws could beg<strong>in</strong> to follow European<br />

model<br />

• Paper prices may rise faster than ability to<br />

raise cover prices<br />

• Price wars could recur<br />

• Decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> CTNs threatens home delivery and<br />

frequency of purchase<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g restrictions could <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

Opportunities<br />

• Fur<strong>the</strong>r consolidation<br />

• Pr<strong>in</strong>t format changes, partly enabled by digital<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g (more colour, more supplements,<br />

regionalisation and special editions) to drive<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and purchase frequency<br />

• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

ability to realise economies of scale (local<br />

papers shar<strong>in</strong>g content)<br />

• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

ability to reuse editorial content across<br />

different platforms<br />

• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies allows papers<br />

to make maximum use of <strong>the</strong>ir advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

content and data about advertisers and<br />

customers<br />

78


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

• E-commerce <strong>in</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> (from advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to distribution) cuts costs, <strong>in</strong>creases efficiency<br />

• Use of <strong>in</strong>teractive and support<strong>in</strong>g technology<br />

to ga<strong>in</strong> a closer relationship with customers<br />

and build loyalty/subscriptions<br />

• Remote pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g and o<strong>the</strong>r means of access to<br />

markets too distant to be cost effective<br />

currently<br />

• Local papers can become local <strong>in</strong>fo providers<br />

via <strong>in</strong>teractive media – brand extension<br />

• Local papers can acquire radio stations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

markets if regulation is loosened<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> newspapers papers may<br />

become more attractive as TV audiences<br />

fragment<br />

• Transactional possibilities through Internet<br />

(referral, e-commerce)<br />

• Broadband will <strong>in</strong>crease functionality of onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

classifieds (double-edged sword)<br />

• Polybagg<strong>in</strong>g presents an opportunity for<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased sales<br />

Figure 13.4 Newspapers: perceived opportunities and<br />

threats over three and 10 years<br />

Opportunities<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />

overseasmarkets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />

new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g,sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Threats<br />

Economic recession<br />

Technological change eg development of<br />

broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

New entrants to your market<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Stricter regulation<br />

Taxation changes<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Source Pira survey<br />

79


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

13.6 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories, bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

media and bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Strengths<br />

• Diversity<br />

• Innovativeness<br />

• Strong brands<br />

• Relationships with advertisers<br />

• Strong newstrade distribution provides a costeffective<br />

route to market<br />

• Successful brand extension strategy,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

• Niche nature of magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> tune with<br />

zeitgeist<br />

• Highly attractive occupation for graduates<br />

• Diversity of revenue streams<br />

• High value <strong>in</strong>formation (B2B, directories,<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation services)<br />

• Strong <strong>in</strong>termediary positions (B2B,<br />

directories)<br />

• Innovative technologies e.g. specialised tools<br />

(bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation services)<br />

• Subscription model (some magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess directories)<br />

• UK strength <strong>in</strong> search and taxonomic systems<br />

Constra<strong>in</strong>ts and weaknesses<br />

• New product launches vital but no longer<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market so much<br />

• Low level of subscriptions relative to foreign<br />

countries<br />

• Expense of postal service constra<strong>in</strong>s growth<br />

of subscriptions<br />

• Fragility of <strong>the</strong> postal service<br />

• Wastage is high – returns, new titles fail to<br />

reach targets<br />

• Hard for start ups to get seed capital<br />

• Exhibitions and events do not have access to<br />

cheap venues (relative to European<br />

competitors)<br />

Threats<br />

• Change <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits and decl<strong>in</strong>e of<br />

CTNs threatens smaller publishers, new<br />

launches, range of choice<br />

• National distribution would accelerate decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent retail outlets<br />

• Fragmentation of postal distribution<br />

• Environmental directives might <strong>in</strong>crease costs<br />

or even threaten some processes<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g restrictions could <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

• Directives on distance sell<strong>in</strong>g, data protection<br />

and cookies<br />

• Increas<strong>in</strong>g power of multiple retailers<br />

squeezes marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

• Age<strong>in</strong>g population presents challenges <strong>in</strong><br />

some markets (women’s and men’s lifestyle)<br />

• Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation <strong>in</strong> some bus<strong>in</strong>ess to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess segments especially directories<br />

• Competition from non-traditional sources<br />

e.g. law firms, banks, ad agencies<br />

• Competition for consumer time and attention<br />

• Exhibitions and events highly sensitive to<br />

economic climate<br />

• Public sector recruitment direct via Internet<br />

• UK Government and public sector and EU<br />

engage <strong>in</strong> value added publish<strong>in</strong>g (affects<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es and directories)<br />

• Availability of free content on <strong>the</strong> Web<br />

underm<strong>in</strong>es value proposition of some B2B<br />

and <strong>in</strong>formation services at <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> (affects<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

aggregators/onl<strong>in</strong>e services)<br />

• Concentration of ownership of premium<br />

80


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

content may affect pure aggregators <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

longer term<br />

Opportunities<br />

• New titles (magaz<strong>in</strong>es, directories)<br />

• Consolidation<br />

• New services based on customisation and<br />

target<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Fur<strong>the</strong>r brand extension and diversification<br />

of revenue streams<br />

• Broadband/<strong>in</strong>teractive TV could spawn new<br />

services<br />

• Trend to niche <strong>in</strong>terests supports magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

new product development<br />

• Demand for specialised, high value bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation as competitive environment<br />

sharpens for all bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

• Sales/licens<strong>in</strong>g of formats abroad<br />

• Direct sales to overseas markets (directories,<br />

some bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es)<br />

• Remote short-run pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g allows new markets<br />

to be served cost effectively<br />

• Licens<strong>in</strong>g of brands to o<strong>the</strong>r media<br />

• Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

ability to reuse content across different<br />

platforms<br />

• Use of advertis<strong>in</strong>g content and advertiser<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation to drive revenues<br />

• Added value services – <strong>in</strong>tegration with<br />

<strong>in</strong>tranets/EIPs (bus<strong>in</strong>ess media/bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation)<br />

• Taxonomy – development of new technologies<br />

and expertise <strong>in</strong> content categorisation and<br />

structure (bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

management services)<br />

Figure 13.5 Magaz<strong>in</strong>es: perceived opportunities and threats<br />

over three and 10 years<br />

Opportunities<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to<br />

overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Threats<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create<br />

new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Economic recession<br />

Technological change eg development of<br />

broadband and 3G wireless networks<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

New entrants to your market<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Stricter regulation<br />

Taxation changes<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher<br />

•<br />

3 years<br />

10 years<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

Source Pira survey<br />

81


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

CHAPTER<br />

14<br />

Future scenarios<br />

14.1 Introduction<br />

The scenarios we have chosen to use are<br />

designed to describe several potential future<br />

circumstances with<strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry will be expected to operate. We also<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>size about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s reaction to<br />

<strong>the</strong>se circumstances. This is done by describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> premise, <strong>the</strong> implications for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

and f<strong>in</strong>ally what <strong>the</strong> outcome for publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry is likely to be should <strong>the</strong> scenario<br />

occur. These scenarios are built us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> basic<br />

drivers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> forego<strong>in</strong>g evidence<br />

and <strong>the</strong> trends that we have presented earlier<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g a realistic picture.<br />

The shift towards a knowledge economy is<br />

not a s<strong>in</strong>gle change but a complex process that<br />

will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to unfold and create opportunities<br />

and challenges as it does so. Publishers will<br />

have to adapt to an environment that demands<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ual evolution of products, enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technologies, skills and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />

These scenarios are a simplified, and by no<br />

means exhaustive, representation of what will <strong>in</strong><br />

practice be a highly complex set of <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g<br />

trends and processes.<br />

14.2 Ma<strong>in</strong> drivers affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios<br />

In develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> scenarios we have considered<br />

<strong>the</strong> most significant drivers that can impact <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess of publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g five to 10<br />

years. The drivers <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> behaviour of<br />

people and companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchas<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g product and <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes towards<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g content or receiv<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

These drivers form <strong>the</strong> parameters which can<br />

be varied <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g differ<strong>in</strong>g scenarios. We<br />

have grouped <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>in</strong>to three ma<strong>in</strong> areas:<br />

lifestyle; work; technology and economy.<br />

14.2.1 Lifestyle<br />

Drivers around lifestyle <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• The competition for consumers time and<br />

money<br />

• The amount of time available for leisure<br />

activities<br />

• The requirements for easier access to<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• The population demographics shift<strong>in</strong>g towards<br />

an age<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

• The time spent shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• The effects of <strong>the</strong> desire for a higher “quality of<br />

life”<br />

• The effects of less time travell<strong>in</strong>g to work<br />

• The desire to better educate children<br />

14.2.2 Work<br />

Drivers around <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• More distant/home work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Ability to access <strong>in</strong>formation from anywhere<br />

at any time<br />

• Better <strong>in</strong>tegration of customer <strong>in</strong>formation with<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Faster decision mak<strong>in</strong>g based on better<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation available<br />

• More mobility of workforce<br />

• More <strong>in</strong>ternational workforce as employment<br />

laws are relaxed fur<strong>the</strong>r and EU expands<br />

14.2.3 Technology<br />

Drivers around technology <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• The adoption by <strong>the</strong> public of new network<br />

services such as broadband, wireless and<br />

digital television<br />

• The adoption by publishers of technology to<br />

improve current bus<strong>in</strong>ess processes<br />

• The proliferation of connectivity to <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

• The level of comfort of people <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

technology<br />

• The success of promised technology <strong>in</strong><br />

deliver<strong>in</strong>g e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess functionality<br />

• The ability of customer companies to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />

publisher’s content <strong>in</strong>to employee’s workflow<br />

14.2.4 <strong>Economy</strong><br />

Economic drivers <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• The growth of <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

• The purchas<strong>in</strong>g power of <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />

• The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> disposable <strong>in</strong>come for<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on publishers’ products<br />

• The impact of <strong>the</strong> transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

• The impact of <strong>the</strong> tax regime<br />

82


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

14.3 The chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge<br />

economy scenarios<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess and analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> trends it is apparent<br />

that publishers, sooner or later, will be work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy environment with <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g characteristics:<br />

• High take up of broadband Internet, wireless<br />

devices and digital TV and ubiquitous use of<br />

personal devices <strong>in</strong> office, home, schools and<br />

while travell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Content will have a high value to <strong>the</strong><br />

purchaser if it is <strong>in</strong> context at time of use<br />

• The use of personal devices such as PDAs<br />

and mobile telephones will <strong>in</strong>crease as will<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir functionality<br />

• Bus<strong>in</strong>esses will deploy sophisticated CRM<br />

techniques and can thus target products<br />

accurately to consumers<br />

• Advertisers will be target<strong>in</strong>g audiences more<br />

precisely and will require more data to prove<br />

effectiveness<br />

• The Internet will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly become a<br />

research tool<br />

• Shopp<strong>in</strong>g will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be a major pastime<br />

<strong>in</strong> large out of town centres<br />

• Consumer will have easy access to products<br />

from around <strong>the</strong> world and electronic<br />

payments will be universally accepted<br />

• Integration of different media will be easier and<br />

more sought after, thus dist<strong>in</strong>ction between<br />

broadcast and pr<strong>in</strong>ted content dim<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

• Younger generation will be technologically<br />

sophisticated and take access to content<br />

for granted<br />

The change to a knowledge economy will lead<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g to polarise <strong>in</strong>to commoditised content<br />

and contextualised content, as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 14.1. The polarisation, however, will offer<br />

companies many opportunities to establish new<br />

products and services for traditional markets as<br />

well as additional services to <strong>the</strong> end-user. The<br />

impact on publish<strong>in</strong>g depends on <strong>the</strong> rate of<br />

change and <strong>the</strong> preparedness of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry to<br />

adapt to it at any given time. The implications<br />

are discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.<br />

Figure 14.1 The axes of <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy<br />

High<br />

Work<br />

Contextualised<br />

content<br />

Ubiquitous<br />

USE<br />

ACCESS<br />

PRICE<br />

Restricted<br />

Commoditised<br />

content<br />

<strong>Home</strong><br />

Low<br />

14.3.1 Slow adaptation to a slowly<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g chang<strong>in</strong>g knowledge economy<br />

This scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry react<strong>in</strong>g slowly to <strong>the</strong><br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment of content<br />

re-use and targeted advertis<strong>in</strong>g. It is fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

compounded by a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess conditions.<br />

Premise<br />

• Circulations and sales per title cont<strong>in</strong>ue to fall<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g spend decreases<br />

• Taxes rise as priorities shift from personal<br />

consumption to public goods, such as<br />

transport and health<br />

• Cautious, conservative attitude to life from <strong>the</strong><br />

general public<br />

• Pace of technological change slows and<br />

companies put off <strong>in</strong>vestments and upgrades<br />

• Investments <strong>in</strong> new technology are not made<br />

by publishers<br />

• Publishers fail to seize <strong>the</strong> challenge of <strong>the</strong><br />

digital media<br />

• New title output decreases<br />

• Publishers fail to get close to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />

Implications<br />

• Free to air and low cost media ga<strong>in</strong> market<br />

share as consumers cut back on<br />

><br />

83


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

discretionary spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• (But) low bus<strong>in</strong>ess profitability and low growth<br />

hit B2B and B2C advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Product <strong>in</strong>novation – e.g. new magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

launches – slows<br />

• E-commerce stalls as bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

slows and consumers shun onl<strong>in</strong>e shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Consumers unwill<strong>in</strong>g to share personal data<br />

but are less fickle and more brand loyal<br />

• Local media and libraries more valued as<br />

people spend less time at work<br />

• Mergers and acquisitions accelerate as media<br />

companies attempt to ga<strong>in</strong> scale<br />

Outcome<br />

If <strong>the</strong> new bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment is slow to<br />

take off due to <strong>the</strong> slow take up of network<br />

technologies, publish<strong>in</strong>g companies will be<br />

exposed to <strong>the</strong> weaknesses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

where sales per title are decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong>re will<br />

be no chance of exploit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> opportunities<br />

projected to occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

environment.<br />

Should <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry not move to put <strong>in</strong>to place<br />

new processes and support<strong>in</strong>g technology to<br />

reduce costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>the</strong> problems will<br />

be compounded as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry will be faced<br />

with dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g revenues without be<strong>in</strong>g able<br />

to reduce costs.<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry will lose out because<br />

it will be exposed to its weaknesses and unable<br />

to meet <strong>the</strong> challenges of a shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

environment.<br />

14.3.2 The fast pace of <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> knowledge economy catches<br />

publishers unaware<br />

This scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> impact of a very<br />

dynamic change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

competitive environment with <strong>the</strong> shift to a new<br />

knowledge economy occurr<strong>in</strong>g at a rapid pace.<br />

It fur<strong>the</strong>r suggests that publishers have had<br />

<strong>in</strong>sufficient time to prepare for <strong>the</strong> new<br />

environment and are exposed to <strong>the</strong> threats<br />

that have been identified with regard to miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out on exploit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new opportunities.<br />

Premise<br />

• <strong>Economy</strong> supports personal consumption<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g at a faster rate<br />

• Affluent and young consumers use <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

technologies for (some) physical shopp<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

digital purchases and bill<strong>in</strong>g and bank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transactions<br />

• ‘Dest<strong>in</strong>ation shopp<strong>in</strong>g’ occurs ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> outof-town<br />

developments <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

enterta<strong>in</strong>ment facilities and ‘shop w<strong>in</strong>dows’ for<br />

travel and f<strong>in</strong>ancial services<br />

• Pace of technology growth cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

• The roll out of broadband and wireless<br />

technology accelerates<br />

• Publishers squeezed by new entrants <strong>in</strong>to<br />

market<br />

• Large funds are put <strong>in</strong>to new start-ups, but<br />

lessons are learnt from ‘Internet’<br />

Implications<br />

• Publishers are panicked <strong>in</strong>to ‘Internet-type’<br />

response<br />

• Publishers forced to develop chargeable<br />

services around creation and use of content<br />

• Focus is lost on exist<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess as time and<br />

money is spent on catch<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

• Lack of <strong>in</strong>centives to create content<br />

• Large <strong>in</strong>vestments are made adapt<strong>in</strong>g content<br />

and advertis<strong>in</strong>g systems<br />

• Publishers unprepared to exploit new<br />

opportunities<br />

• Content may be dumbed-down, but<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation easily available to every consumer,<br />

wherever <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

• Even greater fight for attention from<br />

consumers<br />

• Retail cha<strong>in</strong> becomes less important<br />

• Sophisticated CRM and CMS needed to<br />

manage multiple channels<br />

• Large retailers become major guardians of <strong>the</strong><br />

customer relationship and customer data<br />

• Retail brands are <strong>the</strong> most trusted by<br />

consumers and are extended back <strong>in</strong>to<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Outcome<br />

The speed of change is such that publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

84


The <strong>in</strong>dustry today<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

companies are unable to move quickly enough<br />

to respond to <strong>the</strong> opportunities and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest considerable time and money <strong>in</strong><br />

respond<strong>in</strong>g rapidly to new threats over which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have little control. Focus is lost as<br />

competition comes from new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

market and o<strong>the</strong>r media companies. Advertisers<br />

move spend<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> media that can deliver <strong>the</strong><br />

best mix of broad and targeted audiences.<br />

14.3.3 Careful transition of bus<strong>in</strong>ess to <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy<br />

The scenario assesses <strong>the</strong> advent of <strong>the</strong><br />

changed knowledge economy occurr<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

a pace that plays to <strong>the</strong> strengths of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry. The publishers have<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued to put <strong>in</strong> place processes, technology<br />

and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models which migrate <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses to operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a managed and<br />

measured transition from paper-based<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g to digital media dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g. The publishers are <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>in</strong> a<br />

position to exploit fully <strong>the</strong> opportunities of <strong>the</strong><br />

new environment, assum<strong>in</strong>g that o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

regulatory and economic factors are favourable.<br />

Premise<br />

• Adoption of technology by <strong>the</strong> general public<br />

follows predicted trends<br />

• Bus<strong>in</strong>esses adapt <strong>the</strong>ir processes at a<br />

steady pace<br />

• Take up of new network services mirrors take<br />

up of Internet<br />

• Companies implement <strong>in</strong>tegrated publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technology systems <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g DRM, CMS<br />

and CRM<br />

• Companies migrate <strong>the</strong>ir paper-based<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses at a manageable pace to<br />

digital bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

• Strategic acquisitions, mergers and<br />

partnerships are made to offer <strong>the</strong> best<br />

products and services to end-customers and<br />

advertisers.<br />

Implications<br />

• <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> companies implement technologies<br />

to improve processes and reduce costs while<br />

prepar<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> future<br />

• Pr<strong>in</strong>t revenues form <strong>the</strong> basis of publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

company revenues for a good number of<br />

years<br />

• Investments are kept at reasonable levels<br />

• Mergers and acquisitions can be carried<br />

across media<br />

Outcome<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is able to develop<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, implement technological<br />

changes and staff tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a manner that can<br />

be supported by its exist<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess and move<br />

to streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. The <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

improves its competitive position and can react<br />

quickly to exploit new opportunities and ward<br />

off, as yet, unforeseen threats.<br />

14.4 Scenario conclusion<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry must prepare itself for<br />

life <strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy. The <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

cannot directly <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> rate of change <strong>in</strong><br />

that environment, but it can take actions now<br />

to ensure it can migrate profitably to <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy at <strong>the</strong> same time as<br />

protect<strong>in</strong>g itself from <strong>the</strong> effects of ei<strong>the</strong>r a<br />

recession and slow uptake or a dramatic<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> acceptance of <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />

economy by both bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

Part 2 of <strong>the</strong> report will provide an analysis of<br />

<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> issues affect<strong>in</strong>g future competitiveness<br />

and draw out <strong>the</strong> necessary action po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

85


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

PART2 PART1<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

87


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

CHAPTER<br />

15<br />

The challenge of susta<strong>in</strong>able growth<br />

15.1 Introduction<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has traditionally been<br />

divided along <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es of publication or product<br />

types. For example, newspaper publishers have<br />

had very little <strong>in</strong> common with fiction book<br />

publishers. Hence, <strong>the</strong> division <strong>in</strong>to numerous<br />

trade associations. Although this served <strong>the</strong><br />

relevant sectors very well <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> very<br />

creation of UK <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Media, an alliance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> PA, PPA, NPA and Newspaper Society,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry perceives <strong>the</strong> need<br />

for reassess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se divisions. Indeed, one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> first debates that was held with <strong>the</strong> steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

committee for this project, centred around<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r we were look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> activity of<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g as traditionally def<strong>in</strong>ed or at <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess of publish<strong>in</strong>g companies, which may<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude activities not currently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream of publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> first areas for analysis was <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and its ability to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support present activities and how<br />

well placed it is to grow. Large and strong<br />

companies lead<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dustry should help<br />

more companies to start and flourish, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more <strong>in</strong>novation to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> fragmentation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

has been assessed <strong>in</strong> regard to <strong>the</strong> UK’s ability<br />

Figure 15.1 Indication of migration of<br />

revenue to new bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />

Revenue<br />

Source Pira International<br />

New<br />

Substitute<br />

Old<br />

Time<br />

to be active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global publish<strong>in</strong>g/media<br />

market and for companies to protect aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

threats from new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

As has been described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scenarios, <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong> a transition towards a<br />

rich, competitive knowledge economy through<br />

which it needs to leverage its exist<strong>in</strong>g strengths<br />

to build even stronger bus<strong>in</strong>esses. This provides<br />

publishers with <strong>the</strong> challenge of migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses from one of decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sales per title,<br />

via a substitution of revenue by ways of revenue<br />

generated by adaptations of exist<strong>in</strong>g product, to<br />

an era of growth based on truly new products<br />

and services. This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 15.1.<br />

As one publish<strong>in</strong>g executive said: “Publishers<br />

are good at respond<strong>in</strong>g to demand, but not<br />

good at creat<strong>in</strong>g it.”<br />

15.2 Take <strong>the</strong> wrapper off<br />

The products of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry have<br />

until recently been closely identified with <strong>the</strong><br />

way <strong>the</strong>y are packaged, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as content<br />

that appears <strong>in</strong> different wrappers. For example,<br />

newspapers predom<strong>in</strong>antly see <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

broadsheet or tabloid as <strong>the</strong> vehicle for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

news; magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers see <strong>the</strong>ir brand<br />

<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically coupled to <strong>the</strong> glossy paper carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir content. Some products – for example<br />

learned journals and directories – have moved<br />

much fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

‘unwrapped’ than o<strong>the</strong>rs. Both publishers and<br />

users are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to evolve towards new<br />

concepts of what <strong>the</strong>y can do with content<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g new technologies, but opportunities are<br />

not always grasped.<br />

Although it is essential to protect <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

products and brands that currently provide <strong>the</strong><br />

lion’s share of <strong>the</strong> revenue (<strong>in</strong> most but not all<br />

cases), publishers do need to reassess <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

assets <strong>in</strong> terms of how to maximise <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

of <strong>the</strong>ir content and use it outside of its<br />

traditional wrappers.<br />

Publishers who generate large proportions of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir revenues from advertis<strong>in</strong>g also need to<br />

reassess <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g content<br />

and also <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>red from <strong>the</strong> use<br />

of <strong>the</strong> advertisement. The bus<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong><br />

88


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

publisher no longer f<strong>in</strong>ishes once an<br />

advertisement is published accurately and<br />

attractively on a page. A range of additional<br />

revenue sources can be foreseen from<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an onl<strong>in</strong>e environment such as:<br />

• Profil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Sales transactions<br />

• User <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />

• Tight target<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Measurement of results<br />

• Added functionality<br />

Most publishers, when talk<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

entrepreneurship, mean creat<strong>in</strong>g more products<br />

of <strong>the</strong> same product type. A new product for a<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e company is a new magaz<strong>in</strong>e, likewise<br />

a new product for a book publisher is a new<br />

book. It is time for publishers to take a fresh<br />

entrepreneurial approach to product<br />

development and use <strong>the</strong>ir content pool to<br />

create new product types, not just more of <strong>the</strong><br />

same old products. These new product types,<br />

free of <strong>the</strong>ir traditional wrappers, will f<strong>in</strong>d a place<br />

<strong>in</strong> both old and new markets. It is no longer<br />

good enough for a publisher to expect to grow<br />

<strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess only by “publish<strong>in</strong>g more books”<br />

as one executive put it.<br />

The first step <strong>in</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> challenge of<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able growth for publishers is to take <strong>the</strong><br />

wrapper off all <strong>the</strong>ir content. This is happen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at various speeds throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />

we will return to this fur<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

15.3 Can <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

compete on a global scale?<br />

Many publishers have said that <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry is now a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

local markets have <strong>the</strong>ir own peculiarities <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of <strong>the</strong> language and culture. To compete<br />

on a global scale, UK companies must have a<br />

strong home base from which <strong>the</strong>y can develop<br />

a truly global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. This requires two ma<strong>in</strong><br />

factors: a) <strong>the</strong> regulation on company ownership<br />

needs to be such that companies can grow <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> areas of media <strong>the</strong>y need to develop <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses; and, b) that <strong>the</strong> companies<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves have <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial, organisational<br />

and technical <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> place to exploit<br />

<strong>the</strong> opportunities.<br />

15.3.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

The proliferation of <strong>the</strong> English language across<br />

<strong>the</strong> world should provide UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies with many opportunities and it will<br />

be one of <strong>the</strong>ir strengths. The <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK is also a strength.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> total of new titles has dim<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

recently <strong>in</strong> consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es, all o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

sectors demonstrate an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> new title<br />

output (See Part 1).<br />

As has been shown <strong>in</strong> Part 1 <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK is broad and diverse. Its<br />

ability to export to both English and non-English<br />

language markets is strong. Individual <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

sectors are on <strong>the</strong>ir own fiercely competitive,<br />

which leads to strength <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

comparison terms.<br />

In markets where <strong>the</strong>re is no special<br />

regulatory regime, UK companies have<br />

demonstrated an ability to create successful<br />

global bus<strong>in</strong>esses. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess publish<strong>in</strong>g, for<br />

example, both Pearson and Reed-Elsevier have<br />

created powerful positions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir particular<br />

segments. In fact, Reed-Elsevier has evolved<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a global bus<strong>in</strong>ess where it can operate any<br />

part of its bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> any part of <strong>the</strong> world,<br />

mov<strong>in</strong>g to areas of <strong>the</strong> world offer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> best<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment.<br />

Books and journals<br />

Book and journal publish<strong>in</strong>g has always been<br />

<strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>ternationally oriented of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors. Historically <strong>the</strong> most<br />

important markets have been <strong>in</strong> Englishspeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas of <strong>the</strong> world such as <strong>the</strong><br />

Commonwealth, as well as <strong>the</strong> US. Now <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trade with <strong>the</strong> EU and o<strong>the</strong>r nontraditional<br />

regions such as Eastern Europe.<br />

The journal publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is now<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated by a handful of global players, for<br />

whom <strong>the</strong> major focus of activity, both <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of sourc<strong>in</strong>g content and sell<strong>in</strong>g products and<br />

services, is <strong>the</strong> US. Reed Elsevier and Wolters<br />

Kluwer may be European <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> but <strong>in</strong> ><br />

89


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

practice <strong>the</strong>y are global/US players. Even<br />

Cambridge University Press operates equally<br />

from <strong>the</strong> US and <strong>the</strong> UK, although its activity is<br />

more on <strong>the</strong> book side. Pearson’s centre of<br />

gravity is also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US. The issues<br />

specifically affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> education and research<br />

market are exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next section.<br />

Digital technologies such as remote short run<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g are open<strong>in</strong>g up o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

market opportunities for newspapers and<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, while <strong>the</strong> Internet has exposed all<br />

publishers to a degree of potential competition<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir domestic markets and <strong>the</strong> possibility of<br />

an <strong>in</strong>ternational audience.<br />

Drivers for <strong>in</strong>ternational expansion<br />

The growth of middle classes with higher<br />

disposable <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong> many parts of <strong>the</strong> world<br />

where English is widely understood, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> demand for learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> English<br />

language <strong>in</strong> new regions, such as <strong>the</strong> former<br />

Soviet republics <strong>in</strong> Central Asia, is open<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

new markets to British publishers. The market<br />

opportunity is most obvious for English<br />

Language Teach<strong>in</strong>g (ELT) materials, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>re will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be demand for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

types of books.<br />

It also appears that <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g market for<br />

books <strong>in</strong> English with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU, where English is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>the</strong> favoured second language, is<br />

benefit<strong>in</strong>g UK exporters more than those from<br />

<strong>the</strong> US. East and Central Europe, which <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 15.1 <strong>in</strong>cludes Russia and Turkey, has<br />

also been a major growth area for book exports<br />

from <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

These figures must be accompanied by<br />

various caveats about <strong>in</strong>terpretation. As<br />

mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on statistical analysis<br />

above, <strong>the</strong> book <strong>in</strong>dustry is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

localis<strong>in</strong>g production, directly or under licence.<br />

Therefore it should not be concluded from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

numbers that sales of books by UK publishers<br />

<strong>in</strong> some markets, such as Australia and New<br />

Zealand, have actually decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this period.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>se markets have been particularly<br />

adversely affected by sterl<strong>in</strong>g’s relative strength,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are also areas where UK publishers are<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly publish<strong>in</strong>g via subsidiaries because<br />

of changes <strong>in</strong> respect of territorial copyright<br />

(see below).<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers<br />

With<strong>in</strong> advanced markets, <strong>the</strong> existence of highspeed<br />

networks has facilitated remote pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

general, and short-run digital pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g now opens<br />

up <strong>the</strong> possibility of economically servic<strong>in</strong>g small<br />

groups of readers overseas. This applies both to<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess media, such as specialist bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, and more general newspapers<br />

targeted at travell<strong>in</strong>g UK citizens, which are<br />

currently distributed often very late and<br />

expensively, or are unobta<strong>in</strong>able. Associated<br />

Newspapers envisages a situation where<br />

travellers may order a specially customised<br />

edition, which will be delivered to a pr<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hotel, and be will<strong>in</strong>g to pay<br />

a premium price for it.<br />

Format sales and <strong>in</strong>ternational launches<br />

There has long been an <strong>in</strong>ternational trade <strong>in</strong><br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e formats, with many cross<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Atlantic and some arriv<strong>in</strong>g from Australia and<br />

Germany. There appear to be no numbers<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g net or gross revenues from this trade<br />

Figure 15.2 Sales of books, schools and ELT,<br />

ex-warehouse prices, £m<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

Source Publishers’ Association<br />

• School and ELT, home • School and ELT, export<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

90


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Table 15.1 Exports of books from <strong>the</strong> UK, £m, current prices<br />

1995 1999 2000 2001<br />

European Union 427.5 436.0 474.2 501.1<br />

Rest of Western Europe 43.5 47.7 44.7 37.9<br />

East and Central Europe 33.8 41.1 42.9 46.0<br />

USA 169.0 201.9 212.6 213.1<br />

Canada 26.6 29.4 32.7 25.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r America 37.3 41.5 39.1 44.3<br />

Australia 81.9 75.9 69.5 66.9<br />

New Zealand 15.9 13.2 14.5 12.9<br />

Africa 75.4 70.7 67.4 76.1<br />

Asia and Far East 178.1 166 176.3 181.5<br />

World Total 1089.0 1123.4 1174.0 1205.4<br />

At 2001 general prices 1265.8 1177.1 1194.7 1205.4<br />

Source Overseas Trade Statistics<br />

for UK publishers, and many UK magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers are part of <strong>in</strong>ternational groups:<br />

National Magaz<strong>in</strong>es (Hearst), IPC (now AOL-<br />

Time Warner), Conde Nast, Advanstar, etc, so<br />

<strong>the</strong>re will be <strong>in</strong>ternal format transfers. Even<br />

where this is <strong>the</strong> case, it would be <strong>in</strong>structive to<br />

take note of <strong>the</strong> direction of transfer as an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dication of <strong>the</strong> location of creative <strong>in</strong>novation.<br />

Sometimes publishers launch <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

editions of magaz<strong>in</strong>es directly. Hello! magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is a case <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t, where <strong>the</strong> Spanish owners<br />

launched both <strong>the</strong> English edition of !Hola! and<br />

a French edition. Hello! is actually <strong>the</strong> UK’s<br />

largest magaz<strong>in</strong>e export, ow<strong>in</strong>g to its<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational subject matter (globally famous<br />

people) and its relatively simple English, which<br />

(almost!) qualifies it as an ELT product.<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>ancial Times is <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

oriented of UK newspapers, regard<strong>in</strong>g itself<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly as address<strong>in</strong>g a global audience of<br />

senior bus<strong>in</strong>ess people and policymakers. It has<br />

launched separate editions of <strong>the</strong> newspaper for<br />

<strong>the</strong> US market and for Germany, after hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

had a separate European edition pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong><br />

Frankfurt and o<strong>the</strong>r centres for many years. The<br />

paper’s <strong>in</strong>ternational expansion strategy has<br />

also <strong>in</strong>volved tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment stakes <strong>in</strong><br />

European bus<strong>in</strong>ess newspaper and magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers such as Les Echos <strong>in</strong> France and<br />

Recoletos <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>.<br />

15.3.2 Challenges<br />

The challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly global marketplace are grouped<br />

under three head<strong>in</strong>gs: competition regulation<br />

and cross media ownership restrictions; US<br />

competition and territorial rights; and copyright<br />

protection and piracy.<br />

Competition regulation and cross media<br />

ownership restrictions 2<br />

The Government to date has tended to view <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as its <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a whole <strong>in</strong>dustry. For example,<br />

<strong>the</strong> special competition rules around<br />

newspapers mean that <strong>the</strong>y are treated<br />

differently from magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publishers,<br />

because of <strong>the</strong> potential impact of concentration<br />

of ownership on political life. The consequence<br />

is also that it re<strong>in</strong>forces <strong>the</strong> divisions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry along vertical sub-sector l<strong>in</strong>es, which<br />

is at odds with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r drivers push<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry towards scale and cross-platform<br />

deployment of brands and content.<br />

The UK lacks a major media player such as<br />

Bertelsmann, Vivendi or AOL-Time Warner,<br />

yet all <strong>the</strong>se companies are active <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

The regulation rules on media-ownership<br />

2 S<strong>in</strong>ce writ<strong>in</strong>g this report, <strong>the</strong> UK Government has issued a<br />

draft Communications Bill that addresses many of <strong>the</strong> issues<br />

raised <strong>in</strong> this section. ><br />

91


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

undoubtedly have a role to play. They make it<br />

easier for new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> UK media<br />

market from abroad to establish a presence<br />

here than for UK companies to build a strong<br />

home base. The def<strong>in</strong>ition of markets needs to<br />

be carefully considered as <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

channels through which end customers can<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>creases, so does <strong>the</strong><br />

potential for plurality and diversity. If <strong>the</strong><br />

Government is serious about creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

conditions for a global UK-owned media player<br />

to be established, competition law and media<br />

ownership needs to be looked at afresh. This<br />

is tak<strong>in</strong>g place, although <strong>the</strong> outcome is<br />

unknown at <strong>the</strong> time of writ<strong>in</strong>g. What is evident<br />

is that <strong>the</strong> UK has a relatively restrictive<br />

competition regime <strong>in</strong> a small market, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

fragmentation, while <strong>in</strong>ternational competitors<br />

build scale and cross-platform capabilities.<br />

Indeed, look<strong>in</strong>g at markets such as ELT, STM<br />

and professional publish<strong>in</strong>g, where competition<br />

and ownership rules are much more relaxed,<br />

UK companies can compete on a global scale.<br />

Specifically, cross-media ownership<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts currently prevent local papers from<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g cross-platform local <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

providers. The argument for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plurality<br />

and diversity of op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se markets is open<br />

to question as most local markets already have<br />

access to more than one local radio station,<br />

plus <strong>the</strong> BBC local radio stations. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

<strong>the</strong> competition rules on newspaper mergers,<br />

which require automatic referral to <strong>the</strong><br />

Competition Commission, lead to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

and unwarranted cost. Of 500 cases referred to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Competition Commission only three have<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> a competitive issue be<strong>in</strong>g found.<br />

The head of a regional newspaper company<br />

said: “A level play<strong>in</strong>g field <strong>in</strong> local markets must<br />

be created, so that we can start to experiment<br />

with extend<strong>in</strong>g our brand.”<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “Newspapers could br<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

professionalism to local broadcast<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

1 If <strong>the</strong> Government wants to encourage globally<br />

powerful UK-based publish<strong>in</strong>g and media<br />

companies it must consider relax<strong>in</strong>g competition<br />

law <strong>in</strong> how it treats <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g sector and<br />

re-exam<strong>in</strong>e its def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> relevant publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sector market.<br />

US competition and territorial rights<br />

Just as penetrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> US market successfully<br />

is <strong>the</strong> great prize for media companies <strong>in</strong><br />

general, so its products represent <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

potential challenge to British book publishers <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir home and third markets. It rema<strong>in</strong>s more<br />

potential than actual, largely due to <strong>the</strong><br />

historically <strong>in</strong>sular outlook of <strong>the</strong> American<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

As one publisher put it: “The US <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

th<strong>in</strong>ks American, whereas <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

th<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong>ternational.”<br />

And ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “If <strong>the</strong> Americans got <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

act <strong>in</strong> gear, <strong>the</strong>y’d wipe <strong>the</strong> floor with us.”<br />

Historically, territorial copyright has def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>the</strong> market areas where particular publishers’<br />

book editions shall be sold. Authors and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

agents have made deals with publishers to sell<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir books <strong>in</strong> particular geographical markets.<br />

Booksellers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se markets and publishers of<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r editions were not permitted to sell or<br />

supply o<strong>the</strong>r editions <strong>in</strong>to those markets.<br />

The growth of Internet booksell<strong>in</strong>g, where<br />

consumers purchased US editions of books<br />

directly from Amazon.com, for example, was<br />

one challenge to this system, although <strong>the</strong><br />

volume impact was small. S<strong>in</strong>ce Amazon began<br />

supply<strong>in</strong>g from its own offshoots based <strong>in</strong>side<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK and o<strong>the</strong>r countries, and s<strong>in</strong>ce rights<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation has been attached to book<br />

descriptions, this has largely subsided.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>flux of US-owned super-retailers such<br />

as Borders were also felt to place <strong>the</strong> system at<br />

risk, but now <strong>the</strong> US publishers have<br />

acknowledged that <strong>the</strong>y should not supply<br />

US editions to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

A separate issue has been <strong>the</strong> decision of<br />

some markets covered by UK publishers to<br />

declare <strong>the</strong>mselves open, or to impose time<br />

limits with<strong>in</strong> which UK publishers must publish a<br />

local edition or face competition from a US one.<br />

Many commentators (especially Americans)<br />

92


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

have seen territorial rights as a hangover from a<br />

past era, and argued that <strong>in</strong> a world of globally<br />

transmitted <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>the</strong> idea of rights based<br />

on geography is outmoded. Before immediately<br />

accept<strong>in</strong>g what is a superficially compell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

argument, it is worth look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> issue from<br />

<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of view of <strong>the</strong> author and agent. They<br />

may well wish to maximise <strong>the</strong>ir return from <strong>the</strong><br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> work by do<strong>in</strong>g deals with<br />

separate publishers that have expertise <strong>in</strong><br />

particular markets. They will be unable to do this<br />

if US editions, which will tend to be cheaper on<br />

<strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong>ir very large home market, are<br />

allowed equal access to all markets. The end<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of territorial rights could also lead to a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

concentration of ownership <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

which could be damag<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> range of<br />

products on offer and employment levels with<strong>in</strong><br />

UK publish<strong>in</strong>g. It must also be said that<br />

currently <strong>the</strong> US does not offer a level play<strong>in</strong>g<br />

field for <strong>in</strong>ternational media companies to <strong>in</strong>vest<br />

<strong>in</strong> US media and has been unwill<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

exchange <strong>the</strong> old area, criticised as a relic of<br />

<strong>the</strong> empire, for a new one <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

Large UK publishers have also taken steps to<br />

ensure that <strong>the</strong>y do not publish too late or too<br />

expensively <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant markets, so <strong>the</strong>re<br />

has been a converg<strong>in</strong>g effect, achieved partly<br />

by local production. This is less open to smaller<br />

publishers who may need more help <strong>in</strong> this<br />

regard, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>ir overall contribution to UK<br />

book exports is substantial.<br />

Copyright protection and piracy<br />

In addition to <strong>the</strong> issues surround<strong>in</strong>g digital<br />

copyright, dealt with <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on digital<br />

media below, <strong>the</strong>re is also a serious threat of<br />

piracy of physical material. This is particularly<br />

an issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book and directory <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

Newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es, be<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

ephemeral and not so <strong>in</strong>ternationally traded,<br />

are less affected.<br />

Publishers are constantly engaged <strong>in</strong> small<br />

skirmishes with pirates. Lately <strong>the</strong>re has been<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g progress <strong>in</strong> some Asian markets<br />

with <strong>the</strong> co-operation of governments and police<br />

forces, but <strong>in</strong> some cases, piracy has been<br />

actively encouraged, or at <strong>the</strong> least condoned,<br />

by foreign governments. Here, high-level<br />

support from <strong>the</strong> UK government <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<br />

of pressure on <strong>the</strong> offend<strong>in</strong>g state is vital.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

24 Government must keep up high-level pressure<br />

on foreign governments to cease piracy and to<br />

take action aga<strong>in</strong>st copyright violators.<br />

15.4 The skills to compete<br />

A strong, well-qualified workforce is essential to<br />

<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g ability to<br />

compete. However, <strong>the</strong> very success of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry as a magnet for talented and highly<br />

qualified young people may be mask<strong>in</strong>g some<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g problems.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> course of our <strong>in</strong>terviews senior<br />

executives rarely identified a lack of skills as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g a constra<strong>in</strong>t on <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>esses. This may<br />

be <strong>in</strong> part a reflection of <strong>the</strong> downturn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

high technology and telecommunications<br />

sectors follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> burst<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

bubble, which has eased <strong>the</strong> difficulty and cost<br />

of hir<strong>in</strong>g specialist technical staff. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews with middle managers, those<br />

responsible for publish<strong>in</strong>g divisions and those<br />

manag<strong>in</strong>g e-commerce projects, it became clear<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re are core skills which need to be<br />

developed and extended. This is supported by<br />

<strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO Foresight<br />

survey below. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> concentration of<br />

much of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> London is<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to o<strong>the</strong>r issues of a more social and<br />

quality of life nature.<br />

Table 15.2 Skill requirements<br />

New skills are needed to cope with <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of new technology 80<br />

New skills are needed <strong>in</strong> order to develop new<br />

products/services 69<br />

New skills are needed to cope with new work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices 66<br />

Skill needs have not changed 13<br />

Base 523<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO Skills Foresight, 2001 Base All employers<br />

%<br />

93


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

15.4.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has been highly<br />

attractive to graduates and school-leavers for<br />

some time. This trend cont<strong>in</strong>ues and it offers an<br />

opportunity for publishers to recruit bright young<br />

people. In fact, <strong>the</strong> education level of people<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g is well above average<br />

(see Table 15.2).<br />

The dynamic and fashionable nature of <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess attracts many people to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Indeed, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early part of a person’s career<br />

<strong>the</strong> concentration of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> London is<br />

<strong>in</strong> itself an attraction. This provides <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

with a highly qualified, relatively low cost<br />

employee base.<br />

15.4.2 Challenges<br />

Most of <strong>the</strong> challenges concern<strong>in</strong>g staff<strong>in</strong>g are<br />

centred on two areas. First, <strong>the</strong>re are issues<br />

relat<strong>in</strong>g to hav<strong>in</strong>g a London and South Eastdom<strong>in</strong>ated,<br />

young employee base with a high<br />

proportion of female staff. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g importance of deploy<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> both bus<strong>in</strong>ess support and as<br />

part of products. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

responses to <strong>the</strong> effect of skills and staff<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts on <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry questions<br />

<strong>in</strong> our survey as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 15.3.<br />

There is a relatively high turnover of staff <strong>in</strong><br />

much of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. In <strong>in</strong>terviews and dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> focus groups, several publishers stated that<br />

attract<strong>in</strong>g graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> editorial<br />

and market<strong>in</strong>g is not a problem, but reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> staff is difficult. Some publishers spoke of<br />

a ‘talent gap’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle level of editorial<br />

departments. Reasons stated dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

as be<strong>in</strong>g causes of this are:<br />

“<strong>the</strong> lack of a career path”<br />

“more attractive offers from o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries”<br />

“a desire for a better quality of life”<br />

The latter reason is fur<strong>the</strong>r compounded by<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry hav<strong>in</strong>g a high proportion of female<br />

staff who often tend to migrate from London<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y have a family. Ris<strong>in</strong>g house prices,<br />

congested transport and <strong>the</strong> lack of affordable<br />

childcare are factors that affect all companies<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> London and <strong>the</strong> south east. On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, even if it were feasible, a wholesale<br />

migration of publish<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> creative and<br />

vibrant environment offered by London would<br />

adversely affect <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> terms of its<br />

ability to attract bright university graduates at<br />

<strong>the</strong> entry level. Solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se issues is not go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to be easy but some of <strong>the</strong>m can be alleviated<br />

by <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>itiatives, especially <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, career paths and flexible work<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry moves more and more<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />

technology, publishers are be<strong>in</strong>g faced with <strong>the</strong><br />

need for more technically-oriented staff. This will<br />

<strong>in</strong>volve attract<strong>in</strong>g new staff to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry, but<br />

Table 15.3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> skill levels, %<br />

No, or Basic Intermediate Higher level Advanced<br />

low level e.g. O levels e.g. A levels e.g. degree qualifications<br />

qualifications<br />

e.g. postgraduate<br />

All publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Management 5 5 12 65 12<br />

Editorial 3 5 17 65 5<br />

Support 5 16 44 29 2<br />

Office adm<strong>in</strong> & sec. 5 32 38 19 1<br />

Production 4 25 35 30 1<br />

Sales, market<strong>in</strong>g & circulation 4 28 34 27 1<br />

Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 3 52 23 16 1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 53 10 12 19 0<br />

Source <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

94


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

also retra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g staff. This is not purely<br />

a requirement for software developers and <strong>the</strong><br />

like, but for employees who can comb<strong>in</strong>e<br />

technical with editorial and management skills.<br />

The chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of products also creates a<br />

need to provide a higher degree of customer<br />

service, <strong>in</strong> terms of help desks and sales desks.<br />

As one manager of e-commerce projects said:<br />

“The biggest problem <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

application has been <strong>the</strong> retra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of both our<br />

staff and those of <strong>the</strong> customers.”<br />

The re-use of content and <strong>the</strong> need to put<br />

this content <strong>in</strong> context is beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to put new<br />

demands on publishers. This is particularly<br />

evident <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, education and<br />

academic publish<strong>in</strong>g markets, although o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

publishers will need to come to terms with this<br />

over <strong>the</strong> next few years. New skills will be<br />

needed to create <strong>the</strong> taxonomies and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation architectures that will underp<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

re-purpos<strong>in</strong>g of content. This is not a one-off<br />

requirement, but one that will constantly develop<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Internet and o<strong>the</strong>r networks evolve and<br />

change. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> better target<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

Figure 15.3 Skill-related constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Difficulty <strong>in</strong> staff retention or recruitment<br />

Skills shortages<br />

Availability of experienced middle/senior managers<br />

Does not constra<strong>in</strong><br />

Slightly constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Moderately constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

•<br />

Heavily constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Severely constra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

0% 5 10 15 20<br />

Source Pira Survey<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>creased direct mail spend<br />

will force publishers’ market<strong>in</strong>g and sales<br />

departments to be tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> CRM techniques.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

2 As <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry moves ever closer to<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g new products and services that use<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g degrees of <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />

value-added services, <strong>the</strong> need for specialists <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and technology will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease. This will require <strong>the</strong> ability to attract<br />

people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and cont<strong>in</strong>ually tra<strong>in</strong> and<br />

re-tra<strong>in</strong> staff. A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g Sector Skills<br />

Council (SSC) must be established urgently to<br />

ensure that <strong>the</strong> skills reflect those required <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy.<br />

3 Proper career development paths us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrystandard<br />

qualifications (driven by SSC) must be<br />

put <strong>in</strong>to place. This will encourage young<br />

graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry who will be able to<br />

compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry more easily<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r potential careers.<br />

15.5 Industry profile<br />

The wide-range of customers and markets<br />

serviced by <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry means that<br />

it is faced with a diverse range of issues and<br />

makes it difficult to speak with one voice. The<br />

competition from o<strong>the</strong>r media conglomerates<br />

makes it imperative that <strong>the</strong> Government, o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries and consumers understand <strong>the</strong><br />

expertise that is conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry and how it can be exploited with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy. As stated above, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry already has highly-qualified people and<br />

is add<strong>in</strong>g more skills <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation re-use, etc.<br />

These are crucial to <strong>the</strong> UK becom<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

effective player <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global economy for<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>formation and e-commerce.<br />

15.5.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry has a recognised and<br />

important role to play <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural and<br />

economic well-be<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> country. This<br />

manifests itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability of <strong>the</strong> variety<br />

of publications used, almost subconsciously, by<br />

nearly everyone <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country every day of ><br />

95


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir life. There is every reason to believe that<br />

this will cont<strong>in</strong>ue as <strong>the</strong> world moves towards<br />

a knowledge economy and this is an important<br />

opportunity for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Individual sectors have vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees of<br />

profile with <strong>the</strong> Government. The national and<br />

regional newspapers are obviously very highprofile<br />

and are used as a prime way of gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

messages over to <strong>the</strong> public. But Government<br />

does not always see <strong>the</strong> newspaper <strong>in</strong>dustry as<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dustry ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a platform for <strong>the</strong><br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of messages.The role of<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e and book publishers <strong>in</strong> society is<br />

probably less obvious to government.<br />

The skill sets available across <strong>the</strong> board<br />

of publish<strong>in</strong>g ranges from be<strong>in</strong>g able to<br />

manipulate, contextualise and personalise<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation through profil<strong>in</strong>g end-user groups.<br />

This is a core set of skills for <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />

economy and one that no o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry has to<br />

such depth and breadth. There is an opportunity<br />

to exploit this expertise outside of <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g products.<br />

The number of Hollywood films based on<br />

novels is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dramatically. This provides<br />

<strong>the</strong> book <strong>in</strong>dustry with fur<strong>the</strong>r opportunities to<br />

raise its profile as an <strong>in</strong>fluencer of society.<br />

The bus<strong>in</strong>ess publications not only arm <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry with a very valuable skill set, but also<br />

Figure 15.4 Percentage of respondents<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g importance of rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry profile<br />

Most<br />

important<br />

Least<br />

important<br />

Not very<br />

important<br />

Moderately<br />

important<br />

Quite important<br />

Source Pira Questionnaire<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence decisions taken throughout bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

Specialised bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

heavily design and purchas<strong>in</strong>g decisions <strong>in</strong><br />

companies. Many economic decisions use<br />

reports that <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />

responsible for <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

15.5.2 Challenges<br />

It was noteworthy that 72% of respondents to<br />

our survey thought that <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry should be higher.<br />

Many <strong>in</strong>dustrial companies are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to realise that <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

documentation has commercial value. In certa<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries, such as pharmaceuticals and law,<br />

companies are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to take on <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

publishers with customised <strong>in</strong>formation tailored<br />

to <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong>ir clients and customers.<br />

The profile of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is important <strong>in</strong><br />

attract<strong>in</strong>g and reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff. As has been stated<br />

previously, <strong>the</strong>re is some concern <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry about its ability to reta<strong>in</strong> staff and to<br />

attract sufficient technological staff <strong>in</strong> times of<br />

need. The <strong>in</strong>dustry needs to build on its current<br />

profile to ensure that publish<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>the</strong><br />

board is seen as a dynamic <strong>in</strong>dustry offer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

excitement and challenges, to compete with<br />

those offered by o<strong>the</strong>r areas of <strong>the</strong> media and<br />

software <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

The role of publishers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> education of<br />

children and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of research to <strong>the</strong><br />

benefit of UK Plc is often not recognised by <strong>the</strong><br />

general public and underestimated by<br />

government. For example, early moves around<br />

<strong>the</strong> Digital Curriculum were signs that not all<br />

parts of <strong>the</strong> Government fully understood <strong>the</strong><br />

vital role that educational publishers play <strong>in</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g texts for schoolchildren. Had <strong>the</strong>y<br />

done so, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial steps to encourage <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />

to take a dom<strong>in</strong>ant role <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Digital<br />

Curriculum would have been tempered with<br />

active encouragement of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

This is also true <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic world, where<br />

journal publishers are often seen as <strong>the</strong> villa<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

whereas many of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g outlets for<br />

research would not be <strong>in</strong>itiated and available<br />

were it not for publishers.<br />

96


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

4 The <strong>in</strong>dustry should undertake market research<br />

to understand how it is perceived by end<br />

customers, government and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

This should be focused on determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong><br />

current perception of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is by <strong>the</strong>se<br />

groups; which particular expertise of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry can be targeted to which<br />

groups and develop<strong>in</strong>g a plan for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

awareness among <strong>the</strong>se groups.<br />

15.6 Industry statistics<br />

To date, <strong>the</strong> statistics ga<strong>the</strong>red for <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry have been focused on<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors. For<br />

example, advertis<strong>in</strong>g statistics are well covered<br />

particularly by <strong>the</strong> newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

sectors. Sales figures are generally well<br />

covered across <strong>the</strong> sectors. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as<br />

fully described <strong>in</strong> Part 1, it is difficult to get an<br />

overview of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole. This needs<br />

to be addressed for a number of reasons.<br />

Companies and trade associations need to be<br />

able to understand <strong>the</strong> changes occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry and respond to <strong>the</strong>m adequately. This<br />

will enable threats to be addressed at an early<br />

stage and significant changes <strong>in</strong> customer or<br />

advertiser behaviour to be identified. It is also<br />

important to be able to compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry with o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries. The <strong>in</strong>dustry is<br />

also highly affected by regulation from <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Government, <strong>in</strong>dependent regulators and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>stitutions. It needs to be able to<br />

marshal evidence quickly <strong>in</strong> support of<br />

representations. The ability to po<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> size<br />

and significance of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry may be critical.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

5 In order to capture <strong>the</strong> essential dynamics of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> statistics:<br />

• <strong>DTI</strong>, ONS and UKPM to collaborate with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r and representatives of <strong>the</strong> EU publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> representations to EU on NACE<br />

revisions (Eurostat 2006). This is an urgent<br />

requirement as <strong>the</strong>re is an autumn deadl<strong>in</strong>e for<br />

submissions and <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itions could<br />

be <strong>in</strong> force for more than a decade.<br />

• Study to be conducted based on <strong>the</strong> gap<br />

analysis from this report to arrive at detailed<br />

recommendations on <strong>the</strong> data that needs to<br />

be collected.<br />

• Government and UKPM to collaborate <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative to communicate to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of supply<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

15.7 Technology adoption<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>in</strong>dicate many<br />

publishers are struggl<strong>in</strong>g to comes to terms with<br />

adoption of technology, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> back-office<br />

and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> front-office. Indeed, <strong>the</strong>se are<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly l<strong>in</strong>ked and we should<br />

refer to publish<strong>in</strong>g technology to cater for both.<br />

The problems of <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation systems, publish<strong>in</strong>g systems,<br />

fulfilment and order process<strong>in</strong>g systems are<br />

complicated <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustry almost unique <strong>in</strong> its<br />

capacity to deliver products electronically.<br />

15.7.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

Many web technology systems have already<br />

been implemented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

and larger companies have made major<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g new products.<br />

Technology can take out a lot of costs <strong>in</strong><br />

production and market<strong>in</strong>g. One small book<br />

Figure 15.5 Number of respondents<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g better technological advice<br />

is important for <strong>the</strong>ir future bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Most<br />

important<br />

Least<br />

important<br />

Not very<br />

important<br />

Moderately<br />

important<br />

Quite important<br />

Source Pira Survey<br />

><br />

97


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

publisher <strong>in</strong>terviewed stated that “<strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet for direct market<strong>in</strong>g has made my<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess much cheaper to run”.<br />

The responses to our questionnaire <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

areas of e-commerce and ICT illustrate clearly<br />

that <strong>the</strong> vast majority of respondents have a<br />

website and a clear majority have a site that<br />

delivers content ra<strong>the</strong>r than be<strong>in</strong>g purely for<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation purposes.<br />

As far as enabl<strong>in</strong>g technologies for<br />

production, distribution, advertis<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

customer relationship management are<br />

concerned, <strong>the</strong> picture is more patchy, but a<br />

clear majority have an <strong>in</strong>tranet and a majority<br />

have or <strong>in</strong>tend to deploy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future, fully<br />

digital workflow, content management and<br />

customer relationship management systems.<br />

Slightly less than half have, or <strong>in</strong>tend to deploy<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future, XML for media-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

storage and data <strong>in</strong>terchange. Publishers who<br />

are already us<strong>in</strong>g content across a number of<br />

platforms and channels – ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

academic/STM/reference, B2B magaz<strong>in</strong>e and<br />

directory publishers, major bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

database producers and a few newspapers<br />

have moved fur<strong>the</strong>st <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of<br />

sophisticated metadata-driven content stores.<br />

Responses to our questionnaire on<br />

expectations for <strong>the</strong> potential of different<br />

opportunities over three years also show that<br />

most publishers see <strong>the</strong> use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

technologies as extremely important (see<br />

SWOT section <strong>in</strong> Part 1). They see <strong>the</strong>m as a<br />

means of creat<strong>in</strong>g new products and services<br />

and as a way of optimis<strong>in</strong>g both editorial and<br />

production processes and order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g processes.<br />

There are extremely important <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>the</strong> board <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

e-commerce with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• The automated returns process and<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives to automate <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g and payment<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Electronic advertisement trad<strong>in</strong>g trials are<br />

underway <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e sector, and<br />

movement towards Sales-Based<br />

Replenishment<br />

• Newspapers are mov<strong>in</strong>g rapidly towards<br />

electronic advertisement acceptance and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are some that have implemented<br />

electronic trad<strong>in</strong>g of advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Some are<br />

deploy<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated multi-channel<br />

CRM systems.<br />

Much more detailed analysis of <strong>the</strong> application<br />

of ICT to transactions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>s of<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g companies is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a parallel<br />

Pira International Ecommerce Impact<br />

Assessment Report on <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g sector.<br />

15.7.2 Challenges<br />

Many publishers, both large and small, struggle<br />

with <strong>the</strong> complexities of adopt<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

technology. These difficulties are both at <strong>the</strong><br />

strategic and technical level. This is partly<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> skill shortages identified earlier,<br />

but it also relates to <strong>the</strong> lack of confidence felt<br />

by senior and middle managers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ability<br />

to assess <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess case for<br />

technological projects. One senior manager<br />

stated: “We have well tested methods for tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

decisions on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not to publish new<br />

titles; but when it comes to tak<strong>in</strong>g decisions<br />

about implement<strong>in</strong>g technology <strong>the</strong>re is a lack<br />

of sound methodologies for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> costbenefit<br />

of each proposed project.”<br />

There is a lack of standards <strong>in</strong> most areas<br />

of technology adoption, mak<strong>in</strong>g it difficult to<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrate systems effectively. Many of <strong>the</strong><br />

standardisation projects with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> book and<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustries are mak<strong>in</strong>g progress, but<br />

<strong>the</strong>se take time.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

6 Sector-specific/common technology awareness<br />

forums and o<strong>the</strong>r methods to communicate best<br />

practice to be devised on key technology<br />

opportunities aimed at both strategic and<br />

technical levels and audiences.<br />

7 Recognis<strong>in</strong>g that it is not <strong>the</strong> role of government<br />

to mandate standards, it should use its<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence as far as possible to support open<br />

standards for content provision on all exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and new platforms.<br />

98


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

CHAPTER<br />

16<br />

The challenge of changes <strong>in</strong><br />

customer behaviour<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry is be<strong>in</strong>g affected by<br />

major changes <strong>in</strong> customer behaviour across<br />

<strong>the</strong> board. The battle for <strong>the</strong> attention of <strong>the</strong><br />

consumer is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>g fought with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r established and new entrants <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

enterta<strong>in</strong>ment and ‘<strong>in</strong>fota<strong>in</strong>ment’ markets. The<br />

plethora of new services and competition from<br />

all quarters means that <strong>the</strong> consumer has less<br />

time and money left over to spend on pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

media publications. In addition, <strong>the</strong> patterns <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> way that consumers shop have<br />

consequences for <strong>the</strong> whole distribution and<br />

retail cha<strong>in</strong> of pr<strong>in</strong>ted products.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> competition for <strong>the</strong> consumer’s<br />

time and money is hott<strong>in</strong>g up, forecasts <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

that disposable <strong>in</strong>come available for spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on media products will <strong>in</strong>crease by<br />

approximately 30% by <strong>the</strong> year 2005.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>the</strong> same source forecasts growth<br />

<strong>in</strong> revenues for <strong>the</strong> major pr<strong>in</strong>t media sectors<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.5% per annum for newspapers,<br />

through 2% per annum for magaz<strong>in</strong>es, to 5%<br />

per annum for books over <strong>the</strong> same period. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry must up <strong>the</strong> ante <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> battle for <strong>the</strong><br />

consumer and prepare itself now to exploit <strong>the</strong><br />

opportunities on <strong>the</strong> horizon.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation provision world, customers<br />

are requir<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>formation focused on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

particular needs. This results <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation not<br />

only hav<strong>in</strong>g to be supplied, but also put <strong>in</strong><br />

context. Competition to <strong>the</strong> traditional bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

or news publisher comes from new entrants,<br />

many of whom were formerly only customers of<br />

publishers; now <strong>the</strong>y compete. For example,<br />

law firms are offer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir clients packages of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation tailored specifically to <strong>the</strong>ir needs.<br />

The response to <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g demands of<br />

<strong>the</strong> customer will need to address four ma<strong>in</strong><br />

areas of competition for revenues from<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g sources:<br />

• Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

customer<br />

• Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser more effectively<br />

• Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance <strong>in</strong> revenue streams<br />

• Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to <strong>the</strong> customer.<br />

Figure 16.1 Importance of a close<br />

relationship with <strong>the</strong> customer, three years<br />

Greatest<br />

potential<br />

Least<br />

potential<br />

Small<br />

potential<br />

Moderate<br />

potential<br />

Good potential<br />

Source Pira Survey<br />

Figure 16.2 Importance of a close<br />

relationship with <strong>the</strong> customer, 10 years<br />

Least<br />

potential<br />

Small<br />

potential<br />

Moderate<br />

potential<br />

Good<br />

potential<br />

Greatest<br />

potential<br />

Source Pira Survey<br />

100


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

16.1 Better understand<strong>in</strong>g and servic<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> end customer<br />

The understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> customer’s habits and<br />

use of <strong>in</strong>formation is vital <strong>in</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right<br />

type of <strong>in</strong>formation to him at <strong>the</strong> right time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

right context. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, establish<strong>in</strong>g a closer<br />

relationship enables better profil<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

advertisers which is essential if <strong>the</strong> forecast step<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> direct mail advertis<strong>in</strong>g is not to turn<br />

<strong>in</strong>to a threat due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased availability of<br />

techniques to major corporations and retailers <strong>in</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g consumer usage patterns.<br />

16.1.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

There has been a recognition by publishers of<br />

<strong>the</strong> need to get closer to <strong>the</strong>ir end-users; 50%<br />

and 64% of <strong>the</strong> respondents to our survey<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated gett<strong>in</strong>g closer to <strong>the</strong> customer as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g an opportunity with great potential for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> three years and 10 years<br />

respectively (Figures 16.1 and 16.2).<br />

The wide-adoption of Internet market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technologies by most publishers (as evidenced<br />

by <strong>the</strong> e-commerce impact assessment) has<br />

pushed both small and large publishers closer<br />

to <strong>the</strong> customer.<br />

The newspapers and consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries have focused on reader groups which<br />

has enabled <strong>the</strong>m to collect good statistics on<br />

<strong>the</strong>se groups and develop brands. This forms<br />

<strong>the</strong> basis for extension to more targeted<br />

knowledge about <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g and buy<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se end customers.<br />

The bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and directories, have started tailor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

products to <strong>in</strong>dividual users. The bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

model here has enabled <strong>the</strong> revenue streams to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to flow from corporate or <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

sources while o<strong>the</strong>r sources of revenue have<br />

been derived from additional services sold to<br />

<strong>the</strong> end user. Many bus<strong>in</strong>ess publishers have<br />

created new end-user services attached to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

traditional brands which are result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

closer to <strong>the</strong> end customer and generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased revenues.<br />

16.1.2 Challenges<br />

Publishers almost across <strong>the</strong> board have not<br />

sold directly to end-users, but <strong>in</strong>stead use<br />

<strong>in</strong>termediaries for <strong>the</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g and distribution<br />

processes. This has built relatively efficient and<br />

cost effective supply cha<strong>in</strong>s, but has led to <strong>the</strong><br />

culture of, as a book publisher said, “let’s push<br />

as much as we can out <strong>the</strong>re, and hope<br />

someone will buy it”. This has been less so <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> case of magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers, but<br />

even here <strong>in</strong>formation has been collected <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of user groups ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

users, ma<strong>in</strong>ly for <strong>the</strong> purposes of driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue ra<strong>the</strong>r than understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> reader better and develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an ongo<strong>in</strong>g relationship with <strong>the</strong>m. This is<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g more important as demands on<br />

consumers’ time grow and loyalty weakens.<br />

The ability to target customers with<br />

contextualised, time sensitive content is<br />

essential to <strong>the</strong> successful exploitation of<br />

content on new platforms <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ward<strong>in</strong>g off<br />

<strong>the</strong> threat of free onl<strong>in</strong>e content. To do this,<br />

customers must be profiled very accurately and<br />

carefully. (See ‘Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance <strong>in</strong><br />

revenue streams’, Section 16.3.) There will be<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g need to understand what<br />

consumers and professional <strong>in</strong>formation users<br />

do on <strong>the</strong> Internet and how <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong><br />

medium. This is helped by <strong>the</strong> use of new<br />

technology which enables <strong>the</strong> easier profil<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry also needs to address <strong>the</strong> way it<br />

currently licences content to third parties and<br />

customers. As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry removes <strong>the</strong><br />

wrappers from its content it is important to make<br />

it easy for customers to licence and re-use <strong>the</strong><br />

content. There are two ma<strong>in</strong> aspects to this.<br />

1. Mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> deal to use content must be<br />

made simpler. The use of Digital Rights<br />

Management technology will help<br />

standardise licences and control of <strong>the</strong> terms<br />

made by <strong>the</strong> publisher and understood and<br />

adopted by licensees and customers. There<br />

are however, different licens<strong>in</strong>g bodies at<br />

present for books and magaz<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>the</strong> one<br />

hand, and newspapers on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry should make an attempt to ><br />

101


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

simplify this structure and give customers<br />

one body with which to deal. Even if <strong>the</strong><br />

current multiple licens<strong>in</strong>g bodies rema<strong>in</strong>,<br />

effort must be made to make it easier for<br />

customers to use content legally.<br />

2. The use of encrypted content needs to be<br />

judicial. Some content will need heavy<br />

protection, while o<strong>the</strong>r content will need<br />

none at all. While understandable as a<br />

reaction to <strong>the</strong> threat of massive copyright<br />

<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement, putt<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> emphasis on<br />

lock<strong>in</strong>g content up ever more tightly could<br />

backfire on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

The ability for publishers to profile<br />

customers more accurately and <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is threatened by regulatory<br />

moves at European level to restrict <strong>the</strong> use<br />

of cookies and enforce end customers to opt<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir personal <strong>in</strong>formation be<strong>in</strong>g stored<br />

and re-used.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

8 Publishers need to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> Digital Rights<br />

Management, Content Management Systems and<br />

Customer Relationship Management technology<br />

to better understand <strong>the</strong>ir end-users’ behaviour.<br />

This will assist both sell<strong>in</strong>g products and services,<br />

as well as be<strong>in</strong>g able to better target customers<br />

for advertisers and direct market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

9 Industry must implement strategies throughout<br />

companies and trade associations to collect data<br />

about how <strong>in</strong>formation is used and its context, as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> current sales and advertis<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

25 In order to provide a simple way for customers<br />

to use content legally, UKPM should explore <strong>the</strong><br />

possible creation of a s<strong>in</strong>gle body to issue<br />

blanket licences.<br />

16.2 Servic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> advertiser<br />

more effectively<br />

The publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry as a whole needs to be<br />

concerned about <strong>the</strong> steady decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> overall<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g market share s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, even<br />

though this has been accompanied by rises <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> actual amount of advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />

accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. One of <strong>the</strong> most<br />

significant changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> share of advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>the</strong> last decade is <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>in</strong><br />

direct mail advertis<strong>in</strong>g. The move towards<br />

personalised direct mail is ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g pace,<br />

based on response rates 36% higher than on<br />

personalised direct mail. The personalisation of<br />

direct mail is still <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fancy and more<br />

sophisticated personalisation can be expected<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 10 years.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> newspaper publishers we<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewed put it as follows: “National<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g costs have now become so high,<br />

advertisers are ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves what is <strong>the</strong><br />

best way to spend <strong>the</strong> available budget. This is<br />

not just a cyclical change, but a structural<br />

change towards targeted market<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

The advent of new commercial radio stations<br />

is a ma<strong>in</strong> driver for <strong>the</strong> use of radio, although<br />

much of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g is purchased nationally<br />

even for local radio stations. The ease of<br />

purchase of this and <strong>the</strong> ability to target local<br />

audiences from a central purchase is a major<br />

factor <strong>in</strong> advertisers choos<strong>in</strong>g radio.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> statistics show a consistent<br />

level of TV advertis<strong>in</strong>g which has recently<br />

become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly fragmented due to <strong>the</strong><br />

proliferation of satellite and digital TV channels.<br />

An opportunity exists here to promote<br />

newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es as a valuable,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated advertis<strong>in</strong>g medium. There needs to<br />

be a concerted campaign to raise awareness<br />

among advertisers of <strong>the</strong> attractiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t media as vehicles for cost-effective<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

A newspaper <strong>in</strong>terviewee questioned: “How<br />

smart is <strong>the</strong> national press at work<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r?<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry needs to f<strong>in</strong>d ways to overcome<br />

<strong>the</strong> barriers <strong>in</strong> order to make itself more<br />

competitive <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g its strengths to attract<br />

advertisers.”<br />

This was echoed by a magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher:<br />

“The share of <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g market for<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es is 6%, it should be about 15%. But<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g directors prefer TV where <strong>the</strong>y can<br />

hide more costs. Yet magaz<strong>in</strong>es receive about<br />

20% of <strong>the</strong> spend on food products. This needs<br />

to expanded to o<strong>the</strong>r product types.”<br />

The world of classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g has been<br />

102


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

most affected by <strong>the</strong> Internet. Recruitment,<br />

hous<strong>in</strong>g and auto trad<strong>in</strong>g are major sources of<br />

classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g, particularly for regional<br />

newspapers and specialist magaz<strong>in</strong>es. There<br />

has been and still is a threat of<br />

dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by new start-ups such as<br />

Monsterboard and exist<strong>in</strong>g players <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />

such as estate agents. <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> companies<br />

who rely on classifieds for major parts of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

revenues are migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>esses onl<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

primarily to defend <strong>the</strong>ir exist<strong>in</strong>g position. This is<br />

not to say that newspaper advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue<br />

is likely to dry up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short-term, but migration<br />

will occur over a number of years, if not<br />

decades. There are parallels here with <strong>the</strong><br />

problems that were faced by <strong>the</strong> STM <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s. The challenge fac<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g classified ads is to get through <strong>the</strong><br />

transition from paper only to electronic only at<br />

reasonable levels of <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />

As an <strong>in</strong>dustry executive <strong>in</strong>terviewed said:<br />

“People are complacent because of <strong>the</strong> dotcom<br />

crash, but Internet use is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. We are<br />

still <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early stages of onl<strong>in</strong>e, explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capabilities and potential. Yet newspapers might<br />

react by downshift<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> grounds that <strong>the</strong><br />

threat has dim<strong>in</strong>ished.”<br />

Fish4 has helped to stave off competition and<br />

has been a valuable <strong>in</strong>itiative, but local<br />

newspapers must not be complacent and must<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop much stronger local-based<br />

value-added services to fur<strong>the</strong>r defend and<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>ir position.<br />

Companies must look for <strong>in</strong>cremental onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

revenue on top of <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>in</strong>t-based advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which adds to <strong>the</strong> value proposition for<br />

advertisers and readers alike. As an advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

executive said: “Magaz<strong>in</strong>es need to exploit <strong>the</strong><br />

skill set of promot<strong>in</strong>g products <strong>in</strong> context to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir users.”<br />

This can <strong>in</strong>clude services such as publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e as soon as its submitted, and add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r relevant <strong>in</strong>formation sources related to <strong>the</strong><br />

local area. The full transition may require<br />

refocus<strong>in</strong>g of journalistic skills <strong>in</strong>to not just<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g local news, but also provid<strong>in</strong>g local<br />

knowledge. Giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> customer simple<br />

enhancements while migrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

over a number of years to a mixed pr<strong>in</strong>t/onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

model has proven very successful <strong>in</strong> STM<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

16.3 Achiev<strong>in</strong>g a better balance of<br />

revenue streams<br />

The consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses rely for a significant<br />

portion of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>come on advertis<strong>in</strong>g (see Part<br />

1). In good economic times, this produces<br />

excellent revenues and profit. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

because of its cyclical nature, advertis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>come is an unreliable source of <strong>in</strong>come, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is some evidence of structural shifts.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it has proven very difficult to<br />

generate sufficient onl<strong>in</strong>e advertis<strong>in</strong>g to susta<strong>in</strong><br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e products, even if <strong>the</strong>re has been a<br />

significant demand for <strong>the</strong> product.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, handl<strong>in</strong>g tens of<br />

thousands of subscriptions has not been seen<br />

as an attractive proposition due to <strong>the</strong> high cost<br />

of postal charges, discounts on <strong>the</strong> cover price<br />

that need to be offered and overhead <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with a large number of subscribers. Some<br />

publishers argue that <strong>the</strong> potential benefits of<br />

up-sell<strong>in</strong>g and cross-sell<strong>in</strong>g could not offset this<br />

to any extent, but o<strong>the</strong>rs have suggested that<br />

this is partly a self-fulfill<strong>in</strong>g prophecy <strong>in</strong> that staff<br />

are not tra<strong>in</strong>ed to focus on this potential and so<br />

up to now results have been disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. If<br />

companies are to reduce reliance on cyclical<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come and make headway towards<br />

runn<strong>in</strong>g profitable websites, subscriptions are a<br />

must. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, subscriptions (particularly<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e) are essential <strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g able to profile <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual end-user <strong>in</strong>stead of just larger<br />

demographic groups.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> move to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

proportion of subscriptions would reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

amount of wastage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, which<br />

would <strong>in</strong> itself cut costs as well as br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environmental benefits.<br />

16.3.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

The strength and efficiency of <strong>the</strong> distribution<br />

channel for magaz<strong>in</strong>es and newspapers<br />

><br />

103


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

results <strong>in</strong> high numbers of purchases through<br />

newsagents and retailers at a relatively low cost<br />

(although as expla<strong>in</strong>ed elsewhere, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

issues here).<br />

The bus<strong>in</strong>ess and STM publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

have managed to implement successfully<br />

subscription-based services, although <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

deal with fewer pay<strong>in</strong>g customers than would be<br />

expected from consumer titles. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are some niche consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es that<br />

have developed very profitable subscriptionbased<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess models.<br />

A subscription model gives a more stable<br />

source of <strong>in</strong>come and improves cashflow. The<br />

cost of fulfillment, however, can make it too<br />

expensive to implement successfully. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet as a market<strong>in</strong>g and order<strong>in</strong>g tool can<br />

reduce <strong>the</strong> cost significantly as well as<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> number of subscribers.<br />

As one consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher stated:<br />

“The Internet version of our magaz<strong>in</strong>e is driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

people to subscribe to <strong>the</strong> paper version.”<br />

A newspaper publisher went fur<strong>the</strong>r: “The<br />

future of our onl<strong>in</strong>e bus<strong>in</strong>ess will be based on a<br />

subscription model. The revenues generated by<br />

display advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> newspapers will not be<br />

affected by onl<strong>in</strong>e, but subscription models have<br />

to play a major role <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e offer<strong>in</strong>gs.”<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g a more direct relationship with <strong>the</strong> end<br />

user will also enable sp<strong>in</strong>-offs <strong>in</strong> activities such<br />

as direct mail and profil<strong>in</strong>g. The use of retailers<br />

such as CTNs, supermarkets and bookshops as<br />

<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> sales channel, means that publishers<br />

are endanger<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir ability to profile users. A<br />

subscription sales model is one step towards<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g this.<br />

In summary, <strong>the</strong> head of one lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g company stated his dream<br />

scenario to be: “The Internet revolutionizes<br />

subscriptions, whereby customers subscribe to<br />

<strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e versions by direct debit and still<br />

purchase pr<strong>in</strong>ted magaz<strong>in</strong>es. Better pric<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

also offered to subscribers and publishers get<br />

closer to <strong>the</strong>ir end-users.”<br />

16.3.2 Challenges<br />

UK consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers have a<br />

lower rate of subscription than <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

publishers and B2B publishers are more<br />

dependent on advertis<strong>in</strong>g (due to a higher rate<br />

of free subscriptions).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ABN.AMRO/Screen Digest<br />

report Mediaphile 2010, <strong>the</strong> expenditure on pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g 10 years is likely to be flat,<br />

yet subscriptions to digital TV, Internet and<br />

mobile phones will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow and<br />

“subscriptions have emerged as <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

source of media revenue”. It is imperative that<br />

<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry to put itself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

position to take some of this pie. Subscriptions<br />

are also less vulnerable to recession than oneoff<br />

discretionary purchases.<br />

A Pira study on <strong>the</strong> impact of advertis<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t shows <strong>the</strong>re will be an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g shift<br />

towards direct mail over <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g decade<br />

largely at <strong>the</strong> expense of newspapers and TV<br />

(see Figure 16.3).<br />

Fulfillment costs of subscriptions has been <strong>the</strong><br />

reason cited by many magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers as a<br />

major reason for <strong>the</strong> lack of emphasis given to<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. Postal service charges and cost of order<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g are key elements <strong>in</strong> this.<br />

One consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e executive<br />

compla<strong>in</strong>ed: “The costs of fulfill<strong>in</strong>g subscriptions<br />

make <strong>the</strong>m currently uneconomic. Up to 50% of<br />

subscription revenues go on postage and<br />

pack<strong>in</strong>g alone.”<br />

As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry moves towards creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g numbers of onl<strong>in</strong>e services, hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

substantial subscriptions to pr<strong>in</strong>t products will<br />

only help <strong>the</strong> process. As has been<br />

demonstrated by journal and B2B publishers, it<br />

104


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 16.3 Projected changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market share<br />

of advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g five years<br />

6, %<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

-4<br />

-5<br />

Telemarket<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sponsorship<br />

WAP&SMS<br />

Email market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Internet<br />

Radio<br />

Broadcast/cable TV<br />

iDTV<br />

Instore POP<br />

C<strong>in</strong>ema<br />

Outdoor/posters<br />

Catalogues/Directories<br />

Brochures<br />

Direct Mail<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es B2B<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Consumer<br />

Newspapers<br />

Source Pira International ‘Future roles of pr<strong>in</strong>t and digital media <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet age’ 2002<br />

is much easier to migrate an exist<strong>in</strong>g papersubscription<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess to onl<strong>in</strong>e based on a<br />

subscription bus<strong>in</strong>ess model than it is to migrate<br />

one based on an advertis<strong>in</strong>g model. Several<br />

newspaper publishers and niche consumer<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es have already <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gness to adopt onl<strong>in</strong>e subscription models.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> words of <strong>the</strong> head of an onl<strong>in</strong>e aggregator<br />

“<strong>the</strong> only way to make money onl<strong>in</strong>e, at least<br />

today, is by subscriptions”.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

10 Relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors to lobby for carefully<br />

managed <strong>in</strong>troduction of competition <strong>in</strong> mail<br />

services to meet cost/efficiency goals without<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g universal delivery.<br />

11 O<strong>the</strong>r routes to <strong>the</strong> customer must be developed<br />

and/or streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> order to protect diversity<br />

and <strong>in</strong>novation and to support frequency of<br />

purchase. For example:<br />

• Professional alternative home delivery services<br />

should be created<br />

• Subscriptions should be extended,<br />

• Targeted direct mail should be exploited and<br />

supported by Internet-based CRM techniques<br />

12 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> trade associations, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> partners need to accelerate adoption<br />

of e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives and standards to<br />

facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation exchange throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

><br />

105


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

16.4 Establish<strong>in</strong>g better routes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> customer<br />

In common with any bus<strong>in</strong>ess, publish<strong>in</strong>g needs<br />

to secure its routes to <strong>the</strong> customer. <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

faces some unique challenges <strong>in</strong> that many of<br />

its products are highly time-critical – a<br />

newspaper which doesn’t arrive on <strong>the</strong><br />

newsstand to catch <strong>the</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g commuter or <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> shop <strong>in</strong> time for delivery to a home is a<br />

useless commodity. Consumers expect <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es to appear on certa<strong>in</strong> days of <strong>the</strong><br />

week. In <strong>the</strong> book trade <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> enormous<br />

challenge of many thousands of unique<br />

products to be kept track of through <strong>the</strong> process<br />

of order<strong>in</strong>g, shipp<strong>in</strong>g, sale and return. Many<br />

orders are very small, but when a customer<br />

wants a particular book at a particular time, and<br />

noth<strong>in</strong>g else is a substitute.<br />

As a result of <strong>the</strong> very large <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

number of magaz<strong>in</strong>e titles and book titles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

last ten to twenty years, both <strong>the</strong>se sectors face<br />

an issue with <strong>the</strong> availability of retail shelf space<br />

to display <strong>the</strong> range that is available.<br />

Newspapers face issues about <strong>the</strong> number and<br />

site of outlets. All sectors face consequences<br />

from <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> consumer shopp<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />

and <strong>the</strong> shift <strong>in</strong> retail structure.<br />

16.4.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper publishers all made<br />

<strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t that <strong>the</strong> UK newstrade is one of <strong>the</strong><br />

most efficient and vibrant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. They<br />

contrasted it with countries like <strong>the</strong> US, where<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es have to be delivered by post<br />

because <strong>the</strong>re are many areas where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could not be purchased <strong>in</strong> a shop. To quote one<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher:<br />

“The UK newstrade has to be seen <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational context. They do a fantastic job.<br />

There is still a vibrant newstrade with a healthy<br />

CTN sector, though shifts are occurr<strong>in</strong>g between<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependents and multiples. The cost of entry to<br />

<strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e market is still relatively low – third<br />

party distributors do a good job both for big<br />

publishers and start-ups. Helps to keep a flow of<br />

new ideas. If you were to try to launch straight<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> US market it could cost $50m to<br />

establish a viable level of subscriptions aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

an entry cost of £3-£4m here.”<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e publisher said:<br />

“In <strong>the</strong> US <strong>the</strong>y lose money on every copy <strong>the</strong>y<br />

sell by subscription. They are forced to do it to<br />

build readership for advertisers and because <strong>the</strong><br />

country is so big that many people wouldn’t get<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es any o<strong>the</strong>r way. We wouldn’t want to<br />

go that route. Brita<strong>in</strong> has an extremely efficient<br />

newstrade distribution.”<br />

The UK is a densely populated country and<br />

is well served with news outlets, although <strong>the</strong><br />

number has started decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> mix is<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g (see challenges below).<br />

For its part, <strong>the</strong> book trade has successfully<br />

handled a vast <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> numbers of<br />

titles available, with <strong>the</strong> aid of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g use<br />

of e-commerce processes with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>. Internet booksell<strong>in</strong>g has been develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as a significant new channel, which appears to<br />

be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market and help<strong>in</strong>g to sell<br />

backlist books which would not o<strong>the</strong>rwise f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

shelf space.<br />

The complexity of <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong> and<br />

<strong>the</strong> issue of returns, which add considerably to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s costs, persist, but at least <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry has faced up to <strong>the</strong> problems with <strong>the</strong><br />

Publishers’ Association/Booksellers’ Association<br />

supported report on <strong>the</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

1997 and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiatives that have flowed from it.<br />

Books have also found new outlets <strong>in</strong><br />

supermarkets and garden centres and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

non-traditional stockists. Though this ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

favours discounted bestsellers, <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

channel <strong>the</strong>oretically compensates. The<br />

predicted catastrophe for <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

booksellers as a result of <strong>the</strong> end<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Net<br />

Book Agreement has not materialised, although<br />

some publishers believe that <strong>the</strong> widespread<br />

entry of US booksellers means that <strong>the</strong> end<br />

game has not been reached.<br />

16.4.2 Challenges<br />

There are a series of <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked challenges to<br />

<strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e and newspaper supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

They centre around changes <strong>in</strong> retail structure<br />

and power.<br />

106


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

• Chang<strong>in</strong>g shopp<strong>in</strong>g patterns and chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

retailer mix (see table 16.1). New high volume<br />

outlets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of out of town shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

centres and supermarkets and decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs (confectioners, tobacconist,<br />

newsagents). Decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> high street now<br />

seem to be slow<strong>in</strong>g, but only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ’better’<br />

high streets.<br />

• Growth <strong>in</strong> power of super retailers, both<br />

those with high ranges of magaz<strong>in</strong>es (WHS)<br />

and those with high volume, but small<br />

ranges (supermarkets)<br />

• Fall<strong>in</strong>g retail marg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

• Pressure from super retailers for special<br />

national distribution arrangements which would<br />

exacerbate <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e of primary news<br />

providers.<br />

The consequences of <strong>the</strong>se changes and<br />

pressures are different for newspapers and<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es, even though <strong>the</strong>y derive from <strong>the</strong><br />

same causes.<br />

Table 16.1 Number of press retailers by type<br />

Retailer<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

1992<br />

2000<br />

Change<br />

Convenience<br />

stores<br />

Store trad<strong>in</strong>g 7 days a week, approx 14 hours per<br />

day. Varied stock which may <strong>in</strong>clude food, news, off<br />

licence, chemist, video hire<br />

2178<br />

7794<br />

+5616<br />

Petrol stations<br />

Shops or kiosks trad<strong>in</strong>g on petrol station forecourts<br />

1469<br />

5791<br />

+4322<br />

Supermarkets/<br />

hypermarkets<br />

Large self service grocery and household stores,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g kiosks outside checkout areas<br />

1334<br />

3751<br />

+2417<br />

Grocery and<br />

general stores<br />

Traditional grocery stores with majority of space<br />

dedicated to grocery items<br />

6714<br />

7633<br />

+919<br />

Travel po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Airports, rail/bus/tube stations and motorway service<br />

stations<br />

979<br />

1082<br />

+103<br />

News store<br />

Major stores with many departments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

1823<br />

1829<br />

+6<br />

Seasonal po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Only trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> holiday periods (e.g. holiday camps)<br />

400<br />

404<br />

+4<br />

Roundsman<br />

Trades by delivery only<br />

1249<br />

1201<br />

-48<br />

Street po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Street seller or kiosk o<strong>the</strong>r than at travel po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

490<br />

296<br />

-194<br />

News primary<br />

News is primary profit contributor <strong>in</strong> a substantial<br />

shop with a quality display of newspapers and<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

9561<br />

8612<br />

-949<br />

News secondary<br />

Smaller than primary, more likely to be <strong>in</strong> a<br />

neighbourhood location<br />

17,253<br />

15,053<br />

-2200<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

Unclassified<br />

1024<br />

1175<br />

+151<br />

TOTAL<br />

44,474<br />

54,261<br />

+10,147<br />

Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g/ANMW<br />

><br />

107


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

Newspapers<br />

The decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> primary and secondary<br />

news outlets (partly due to conversion to<br />

convenience format) threatens home delivery<br />

and frequency of newspaper purchase.<br />

One regional newspaper group told us: “The<br />

problem for newspapers is <strong>the</strong> pure number of<br />

convenient outlets, as newspapers are a<br />

purchase made on <strong>the</strong> way somewhere.”<br />

As we noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> section on newspapers<br />

above (statistical analysis) <strong>the</strong> extent of home<br />

delivery has decl<strong>in</strong>ed substantially s<strong>in</strong>ce 1992.<br />

Frequency of purchase is doubly impacted by<br />

<strong>the</strong> loss of home delivery and <strong>the</strong> loss of outlets<br />

for impulse purchase.<br />

Figure 16.4 Number of retail outlets<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g newspapers<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

40000<br />

30000<br />

20000<br />

10000<br />

1994<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

Source Association of Magaz<strong>in</strong>e and Newspaper Wholesalers<br />

2000<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Here <strong>the</strong> threat is to range and to <strong>the</strong> entry of<br />

new launches on to <strong>the</strong> market. The problem is<br />

particularly acute for smaller publishers. A<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry executive expressed<br />

<strong>the</strong> problem to us like this: “There is great<br />

concern among smaller publishers about <strong>the</strong><br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> numbers of <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

newsagents as a result of <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong><br />

shopp<strong>in</strong>g patterns. Although supermarkets and<br />

petrol stations have filled <strong>the</strong> gap <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

volume, <strong>the</strong>y do not carry <strong>the</strong> range of<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependents do. On average a<br />

supermarket will stock only 300-400 magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

and even <strong>the</strong> biggest will only take 700. There<br />

are 3000 regular titles.<br />

This is likely to damage both exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

specialist titles, and new launches, as it will be<br />

impossible to get visibility. Aga<strong>in</strong> this will affect<br />

smaller publishers more severely as <strong>the</strong>y will<br />

not be able to use <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong>ir big sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

titles to ensure that smaller titles or new<br />

launches are stocked by <strong>the</strong> supermarkets.<br />

There is a high degree of frustration among <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller publishers. These publishers are often<br />

<strong>the</strong> source of new ideas and new opportunities<br />

for <strong>the</strong> market as a whole, so it matters to<br />

everyone.”<br />

This view is supported by <strong>the</strong> chart (Figure<br />

16.5) which shows <strong>the</strong> number of retailers<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g magaz<strong>in</strong>es by sizeband of circulation.<br />

Figure 16.5 More retailers favour large<br />

sell<strong>in</strong>g titles<br />

500-1000<br />

100-250<br />

50-75<br />

>25<br />

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000<br />

Source Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

108


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

The major expansion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of retailers<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s favoured <strong>the</strong> larger sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

titles. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller specialist titles saw a reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

number of retail outlets handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir titles.<br />

16.4.3 Supermarkets and super<br />

news retailers<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers also have concerns<br />

about <strong>the</strong> way that supermarkets handle<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e stock, though <strong>the</strong>y told us that this<br />

varies substantially between <strong>the</strong> cha<strong>in</strong>s, with<br />

some dedicat<strong>in</strong>g specialists to it and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g it to be done by whoever is available<br />

at any time. They are also worried about<br />

supermarket power: “The power of<br />

supermarkets is a problem – <strong>the</strong>y act as<br />

gatekeepers to <strong>the</strong> customer, and <strong>the</strong>ir power<br />

to ’delist’ magaz<strong>in</strong>es is worry<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

A number of publishers compla<strong>in</strong>ed about <strong>the</strong><br />

behaviour of WH Smith <strong>in</strong> relation to demands<br />

for promotional payments, which <strong>the</strong>y saw as an<br />

abuse of <strong>the</strong>ir market position.<br />

One consumer publisher told us: “When WHS<br />

first <strong>in</strong>vented promotional activity like ’f<strong>in</strong>s’ and<br />

’Hot off <strong>the</strong> press’ standouts it worked well for<br />

publishers. Now if you won’t pay for f<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong>y threaten to delist you.”<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r commented: “They can hold <strong>the</strong><br />

smaller titles to ransom <strong>in</strong> terms of cost. They<br />

also are charg<strong>in</strong>g bigger publishers more for<br />

promotional space e.g. for new launches.<br />

Smaller magaz<strong>in</strong>es can’t afford to compla<strong>in</strong> to<br />

<strong>the</strong> OFT – <strong>the</strong>y would be out of bus<strong>in</strong>ess by <strong>the</strong><br />

time <strong>the</strong> case was heard, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y depend<br />

almost totally on WHS.“<br />

16.4.4 Postal services<br />

There is ano<strong>the</strong>r set of issues around postal<br />

services that affect magaz<strong>in</strong>es and books. Many<br />

publishers told us <strong>the</strong> postal service was:<br />

• Too expensive<br />

• Becom<strong>in</strong>g less efficient<br />

• Changes its rates with <strong>in</strong>sufficient notice,<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g publishers’ budgets and plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The state of <strong>the</strong> postal service impacts on <strong>the</strong><br />

sectors <strong>in</strong> several ways:<br />

• It affects current operations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

customer relationships where publishers rely<br />

on it for delivery of subscription copies<br />

• It affects <strong>the</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness of publishers to <strong>in</strong>vest<br />

<strong>in</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g more customers onto a subscription<br />

basis, to offset <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

areas of <strong>the</strong> newstrade<br />

• It raises <strong>the</strong> cost of do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess for book<br />

publishers who now ship orders <strong>in</strong> smaller lots<br />

<strong>in</strong> order to respond more accurately to<br />

customer demand and reduce <strong>the</strong> levels of<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

In all <strong>the</strong>se ways, it is problematic precisely<br />

because it is prevent<strong>in</strong>g or hamper<strong>in</strong>g trends<br />

towards greater responsiveness to <strong>the</strong> customer<br />

and closer customer relationships, which we<br />

have emphasised as critical issues for<br />

publishers <strong>in</strong> a number of places <strong>in</strong> this report.<br />

Several publishers expressed frustration that it<br />

is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> common <strong>in</strong>terest of <strong>the</strong> publishers and<br />

Consignia/Royal Mail to satisfy and grow<br />

demand for pr<strong>in</strong>ted material through <strong>the</strong> post.<br />

16.4.5 Conclusions and actions<br />

It would be easy to see <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

patterns as an <strong>in</strong>exorable trend and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

consider that <strong>the</strong>re is little or noth<strong>in</strong>g that can be<br />

done. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

distribution companies and trade bodies) is<br />

already attempt<strong>in</strong>g to support <strong>the</strong> better quality<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent newsagent through jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

and promotional activities. Given <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

impact on consumer choice and <strong>in</strong>novation of<br />

sharp fur<strong>the</strong>r decl<strong>in</strong>es, this is an effort well worth<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> our view.<br />

It is also important to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> e-commerce <strong>in</strong><br />

order to try to meet <strong>the</strong> concerns of <strong>the</strong> major<br />

retailers, but not at <strong>the</strong> expense of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dependents The Government and competition<br />

authorities need to be sensitive to <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

picture <strong>in</strong> relation to consumer choice, diversity<br />

and <strong>in</strong>novation when mak<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />

Because it will improve efficiency and market<br />

responsiveness, e-commerce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> should also help to reduce <strong>the</strong> level of ><br />

109


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

unsold product which has to be returned and<br />

destroyed. It is also vital for publishers to look to<br />

<strong>the</strong> future The action po<strong>in</strong>ts here supplement<br />

<strong>the</strong> ones conclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> section on achiev<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

better balance <strong>in</strong> revenue streams, above.<br />

Although publishers are right to stress <strong>the</strong><br />

cost-effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g newstrade,<br />

and seek to protect it, <strong>the</strong>y also need to tackle<br />

some of <strong>the</strong> obstacles to exploit<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r routes<br />

to <strong>the</strong> customer and consider o<strong>the</strong>r collateral<br />

benefits, such as <strong>in</strong>creased customer loyalty<br />

and waste reduction.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

13 Industry and distribution trade associations to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support <strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs with<br />

promotional campaigns, clubs and supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>novations.<br />

14 Supermarkets must <strong>in</strong>clude magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

newspapers and books <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supermarket code.<br />

This code also needs to be made more robust.<br />

15 Build on exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> report “Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />

Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize” – use this opportunity to<br />

<strong>in</strong>ject fresh momentum.<br />

110


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

CHAPTER<br />

17<br />

The challenge of digital media<br />

17.1 Strengths and opportunities<br />

Digital technologies are fundamental to <strong>the</strong><br />

future of publish<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>the</strong>y affect<br />

different elements of publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong><br />

customer and <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> product and <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess model <strong>in</strong> different ways and at different<br />

speeds. The characterisation of formats <strong>in</strong><br />

Chapter 12 <strong>in</strong> Part 1 is an attempt to capture<br />

some of this <strong>in</strong> relation to end customers. The<br />

broad conclusion from that would be that <strong>the</strong><br />

segments most impacted by digital media are<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g, but <strong>the</strong>re are also significant impacts<br />

on broadsheet national newspapers and local<br />

newspapers. Arguably, consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and fiction books are <strong>the</strong> least impacted,<br />

although one should be careful to draw a<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between lifestyle glossy magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

general women’s, TV-related and celebrity<br />

weeklies on <strong>the</strong> one hand and <strong>in</strong>terest focused<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, particularly those <strong>in</strong><br />

more technology or youth-oriented segments.<br />

An overview of <strong>the</strong> responses of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Internet was given <strong>in</strong> Chapter 10.<br />

Our <strong>in</strong>terviews revealed a pattern of attitudes<br />

that are related to <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which digital<br />

technologies have been exploited so far by <strong>the</strong><br />

different segments of publish<strong>in</strong>g. Many book<br />

publishers were affected by <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial losses<br />

<strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir enthusiasm for CD-ROM<br />

development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-90s, and so tend to be<br />

cautious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir approach to e-books, although<br />

not necessarily to pr<strong>in</strong>t-on-demand. On <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong>y perceive <strong>the</strong> Internet positively,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly because Internet booksellers such as<br />

Amazon are seen to be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market and<br />

also sell<strong>in</strong>g books from <strong>the</strong> back list that would<br />

not f<strong>in</strong>d shelf space at retail. For <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet – so far anyway – has represented an<br />

additional revenue stream, or at <strong>the</strong> least has<br />

not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> much cost. These<br />

generalisations do not apply to journal and STM<br />

publishers, who have moved much fur<strong>the</strong>r down<br />

<strong>the</strong> track of deliver<strong>in</strong>g content electronically. For<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> Internet is a major channel to <strong>the</strong><br />

customer, with correspond<strong>in</strong>gly high expenditure<br />

and revenues. By contrast, many national<br />

newspaper and some magaz<strong>in</strong>e publishers<br />

have made very large expenditures on onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

development, and <strong>in</strong> most cases, although not<br />

all, <strong>the</strong>y have seen virtually no revenue as a<br />

result. This is bound to colour <strong>the</strong>ir attitudes to<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g content for broadband, for example.<br />

At a more basic level, <strong>the</strong> Internet and its<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g protocols and associated languages<br />

(TCP/IP, browsers, HTML, XML, email) have<br />

already had a huge impact on <strong>the</strong> processes of<br />

production and on <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>, even where<br />

<strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al product is a book, newspaper or<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e pr<strong>in</strong>ted on paper, delivered physically<br />

to a retailer and carried home by <strong>the</strong> consumer.<br />

Regardless of attitudes to <strong>the</strong> potential of new<br />

platforms to generate revenue, publishers are<br />

positive about <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong>se technologies<br />

with<strong>in</strong> production and supply cha<strong>in</strong> distribution.<br />

Many publishers have been enthusiastic <strong>in</strong><br />

embrac<strong>in</strong>g new technologies and quick to see<br />

<strong>the</strong> opportunities both for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

efficiency and for creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative products<br />

and services. The evidence is <strong>the</strong>re on <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet for all to see, and to a lesser extent on<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r new platforms such as <strong>in</strong>teractive TV and<br />

mobile. Our questionnaire confirms this <strong>in</strong><br />

show<strong>in</strong>g 78% of respondents have a website<br />

for content delivery, ra<strong>the</strong>r than merely for<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation purposes. Attitudes to broadband,<br />

Digital TV and third generation mobile platforms<br />

will be explored <strong>in</strong> a later section.<br />

17.2 Challenges<br />

A major challenge comes from changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

competitive environment, particularly<br />

dis<strong>in</strong>termediation (e.g. rights retention by<br />

authors) and competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g parts of<br />

<strong>the</strong> value cha<strong>in</strong>, and from perceived sources of<br />

unfair competition, such as <strong>the</strong> BBC, <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

government and o<strong>the</strong>r public sector bodies.<br />

17.2.1 The chang<strong>in</strong>g competitive landscape<br />

Digital technologies have created what might<br />

be termed a new competitive ‘h<strong>in</strong>terland’ for<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g companies. Whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> offl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

world, newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es, TV and radio<br />

form separate ‘channels’ with <strong>the</strong>ir own modes<br />

112


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

of use and competitive advantages, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Web (whe<strong>the</strong>r delivered over fat or th<strong>in</strong><br />

pipes) <strong>the</strong>y sit side by side. Although not all<br />

sites are created equal – those with powerful<br />

offl<strong>in</strong>e brands and assets can br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se to<br />

bear onl<strong>in</strong>e – <strong>the</strong> Web is an arena where strong<br />

brands that have not competed head to head<br />

before, start to do so. This can have an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational dimension – say The Times versus<br />

The New York Times, or CNN and <strong>the</strong> BBC, or<br />

be across sectors.<br />

The web also (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory) permits customers to<br />

reach suppliers without need<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termediaries,<br />

or via new <strong>in</strong>termediaries, and vice versa. This<br />

could take <strong>the</strong> form of authors try<strong>in</strong>g to dispense<br />

with publishers, where <strong>the</strong> author, or perhaps<br />

journal, already has a big brand. It may <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

<strong>the</strong> dissolution of exist<strong>in</strong>g bundles of content,<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> journal, <strong>in</strong>to its constituent parts,<br />

with customers buy<strong>in</strong>g only <strong>the</strong> part <strong>the</strong>y want.<br />

Aggregators of various k<strong>in</strong>ds already exist to<br />

facilitate this <strong>in</strong> both STM and academic<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply of bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

It has already taken <strong>the</strong> form of groups of<br />

advertisers, such as real estate agents and<br />

recruitment agencies, launch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir own onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

services to reach customers directly. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong> issue of ‘dis<strong>in</strong>termediation/re<strong>in</strong>termediation’<br />

has apparently receded as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

demise of most onl<strong>in</strong>e-only start-ups, it would be<br />

foolish to be complacent, especially <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to classified advertis<strong>in</strong>g. Onl<strong>in</strong>e penetration is<br />

still ris<strong>in</strong>g, a new generation used to <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

technologies is matur<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong> functionality of<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e classifieds is set to <strong>in</strong>crease. One lett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

agency reports that 40% of its leads come from<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e. <strong>Home</strong>buyers’ and sellers’ packs are on<br />

<strong>the</strong> horizon, and valuation and survey<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, toge<strong>the</strong>r (eventually) with video will<br />

make property searches very much easier<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e than offl<strong>in</strong>e. Job search<strong>in</strong>g is one of <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>cipal uses of corporate web sites, while<br />

major companies are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir human resources functions electronically,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g handl<strong>in</strong>g all aspects of recruitment,<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g specialist software. This will ultimately<br />

tend to favour onl<strong>in</strong>e recruitment. This could<br />

particularly affect some of <strong>the</strong> national<br />

broadsheets. There is also <strong>the</strong> threat that local<br />

government and health jobs will be advertised<br />

directly by councils and via NHS sites. It is<br />

notable that papers such as The Guardian<br />

have taken considerable steps to try to<br />

protect this vital revenue stream by creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

content and even more crucially, functionality,<br />

which considerably extends what is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted paper.<br />

It should be obvious that anyth<strong>in</strong>g that tends<br />

to separate advertis<strong>in</strong>g from editorial content<br />

has <strong>the</strong> potential to break <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />

of <strong>the</strong> newspaper, if <strong>the</strong> newspaper does not<br />

command that advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue stream <strong>in</strong><br />

its o<strong>the</strong>r form.<br />

The web can permit elements of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> to become competitive with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

suppliers or customers, for example, customers<br />

of Reuters’ news wholesale bus<strong>in</strong>ess becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wholesalers <strong>in</strong> turn to o<strong>the</strong>r sites. It encourages<br />

all k<strong>in</strong>ds of companies to become publishers:<br />

law firms, f<strong>in</strong>ancial services companies and<br />

consultancies, even supermarkets are<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g much more extensive content as a<br />

means of reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g clients or as a customer<br />

service, ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a revenue generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exercise. These companies could become<br />

customers of publishers <strong>in</strong> a new sense<br />

however – customers for <strong>the</strong>ir content but also<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir expertise <strong>in</strong> content handl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

editorial selection.<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation suppliers are also<br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g forward to <strong>in</strong>tegrate <strong>the</strong>ir services tightly<br />

with<strong>in</strong> customers’ IT systems, for example <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tranets, Enterprise Information Portals or<br />

Enterprise Resource Plann<strong>in</strong>g systems. In <strong>the</strong><br />

process <strong>the</strong>y have to get to grips with<br />

technology issues which would never before<br />

have been part of publishers’ core<br />

competences. Reuters for example produces<br />

software tool kits and offers consultancy advice,<br />

not only to <strong>in</strong>tegrate Reuters’ <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>to<br />

companies’ EIPs or <strong>in</strong>tranets, but also to<br />

organise companies’ own <strong>in</strong>formation. They<br />

have formed partnerships with EIP<br />

113


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

companies, but also f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong><br />

competition with software suppliers and systems<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrators. It is a path which has also been<br />

taken by TSO, which manages <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

even services <strong>the</strong> clients of o<strong>the</strong>r organisations.<br />

As bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e and directory<br />

publishers expand <strong>the</strong>ir specialised offer<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong>to higher value areas via <strong>the</strong> Internet, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

also beg<strong>in</strong> to compete more directly with <strong>the</strong><br />

general bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation vendors, although<br />

<strong>the</strong>y also use <strong>the</strong>m as a resell<strong>in</strong>g channel.<br />

17.2.2 Competition from publicly<br />

funded bodies<br />

Current f<strong>in</strong>ancial pressures on publish<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

<strong>the</strong> fall <strong>in</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and <strong>the</strong> hangover<br />

from <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> technology and telecoms<br />

booms have thrown <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e activities of both<br />

<strong>the</strong> BBC and government/EU <strong>in</strong>to sharp relief,<br />

as <strong>the</strong>y are able to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g. In<br />

addition, concern cont<strong>in</strong>ues on <strong>the</strong> level of cross<br />

promotion by <strong>the</strong> BBC on its free to air services.<br />

Central and local government and <strong>the</strong> EU are<br />

naturally keen to use <strong>the</strong> new platforms as a<br />

means of reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> citizen with <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

and sett<strong>in</strong>g up cost-effective ways for people to<br />

transact bus<strong>in</strong>ess with government departments<br />

such as fil<strong>in</strong>g tax returns, obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

licences, etc. Some publishers see<br />

governments overstepp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mark <strong>in</strong>to<br />

value-added publish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Our <strong>in</strong>terviews revealed a degree of anger<br />

and mistrust at perceived unfair competition<br />

from both <strong>the</strong> government and EU, and also <strong>the</strong><br />

BBC. The sectors affected differed. Government<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g activities were seen as most<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g by bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and directory publishers and local newspapers,<br />

who fear <strong>the</strong> impact of central and local<br />

government and NHS electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities on <strong>the</strong>ir advertis<strong>in</strong>g and sales<br />

revenues. Publishers of specialist health and<br />

municipal publications are particularly worried,<br />

with local newspapers report<strong>in</strong>g concern but<br />

also suggest<strong>in</strong>g that a partnership model with<br />

local public bodies is work<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Educational publishers were most upset by<br />

<strong>the</strong> implications of <strong>the</strong> Government’s approach<br />

to us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> BBC to deliver <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

curriculum. There were a number of strands<br />

to this. First of all, publishers perceive <strong>the</strong><br />

Government as downgrad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

of books and o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ted material <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

classroom, and of be<strong>in</strong>g unaware of <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

to which <strong>the</strong> efficacy of <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e delivery of<br />

education varies considerably by educational<br />

subject. Secondly, <strong>the</strong>y questioned <strong>the</strong> ‘topdown’<br />

monolithic approach to <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

curriculum, which marg<strong>in</strong>alises <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual teachers <strong>in</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g material from<br />

specialist publishers. Thirdly, <strong>the</strong>y were very<br />

angry at what is seen as ‘empire-build<strong>in</strong>g’ by<br />

<strong>the</strong> BBC.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itiatives taken by <strong>the</strong> Government to<br />

create a digital curriculum <strong>in</strong> partnership<br />

between <strong>the</strong> Government, commercial <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

and <strong>the</strong> BBC are well-<strong>in</strong>tentioned. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed implementation highlights many of<br />

<strong>the</strong> problems of publishers operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

commercial environment at <strong>the</strong> same time as a<br />

public broadcaster whose fund<strong>in</strong>g from public<br />

funds can imp<strong>in</strong>ge on commercial activities. In<br />

our survey, 18% of respondents said that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have not proceeded with a project because of<br />

<strong>the</strong> activities of <strong>the</strong> BBC.<br />

This stems from a basic distrust among<br />

publishers of <strong>the</strong> BBC activities and its tendency<br />

to use ‘editorial control’ and ‘brand protection’<br />

as major arguments for select<strong>in</strong>g publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suppliers when it is offer<strong>in</strong>g tenders. Despite<br />

<strong>the</strong>re be<strong>in</strong>g very strict rules <strong>in</strong> place govern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

anti-competitive activity, <strong>the</strong> actions of <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />

<strong>in</strong> practice, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>the</strong> exclusive<br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> BBC and BBC<br />

Worldwide, have given rise to tremendous<br />

distrust among publishers as to its motives.<br />

Publishers generally were also concerned<br />

at <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> BBC may now be<br />

stifl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> nascent onl<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment by its massive <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

medium, although <strong>the</strong>re was also<br />

acknowledgement that it had helped to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a wider audience to <strong>the</strong> Internet. As one of our<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewees said:<br />

114


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

“The BBC has done a fantastic job onl<strong>in</strong>e. It is<br />

high quality content. We just can’t compete with<br />

<strong>the</strong> £90 million <strong>in</strong>vestment it took to create it.”<br />

Publishers have learned to live with, and<br />

<strong>in</strong> many cases, benefit from <strong>the</strong> BBC’s<br />

conventional publish<strong>in</strong>g activities, although <strong>the</strong>y<br />

believe that a much more open relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> BBC public service and BBC<br />

Worldwide is needed <strong>in</strong> order to maximise <strong>the</strong><br />

potential partnership opportunities. That modus<br />

vivendi has not been atta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

environment, partly because <strong>the</strong>re is a sense of<br />

not know<strong>in</strong>g where <strong>the</strong> BBC may choose to<br />

expand next, and what <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong><br />

Government and <strong>the</strong> regulators will be. This is<br />

very apparent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of Curriculum Onl<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

There needs to be a re-establishment of trust,<br />

based on clarity about what <strong>the</strong> ground rules<br />

are and equally importantly, that <strong>the</strong>y will be<br />

enforced <strong>in</strong> spirit as well as letter. In draft<strong>in</strong>g our<br />

recommendations we are very aware of <strong>the</strong><br />

tim<strong>in</strong>g of this report, com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst of <strong>the</strong><br />

creation of a new regulatory framework centred<br />

around Ofcom, and that is why <strong>the</strong> stress is laid<br />

not so much on detailed organisational<br />

suggestions as on <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

worry<strong>in</strong>g breakdown of trust which any<br />

regulatory set up will have to try to resolve.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts – BBC<br />

26 Recognis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> BBC brand to<br />

<strong>in</strong>spire consumer trust <strong>in</strong> new media, <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />

could harness this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a vibrant<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent multimedia sector by commission<strong>in</strong>g<br />

significant amounts of onl<strong>in</strong>e/broadband content<br />

from <strong>in</strong>dependent producers. This should be<br />

monitored by OFCOM.<br />

27 Independent research should be commissioned to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> impact of cross-promotion from BBC<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services to its onl<strong>in</strong>e content and<br />

suggest remedial action if necessary.<br />

28 Electronic learn<strong>in</strong>g credits should be large enough<br />

to prevent BBC from dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> market. The<br />

Publishers Association and BESA to encourage<br />

private sector collaboration to provide a coherent<br />

managed learn<strong>in</strong>g offer<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

29 DFES to ensure its bidd<strong>in</strong>g processes for digital<br />

curriculum activities are open and well publicised.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts – exploitation of government<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and government publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

30 Government should establish as soon as possible<br />

an advisory panel to HMSO, consist<strong>in</strong>g of senior<br />

private and public sector representatives to<br />

monitor policies and practices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation trad<strong>in</strong>g environment as recommended<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Information Review.<br />

31 Government to implement <strong>in</strong>teroperable<br />

standards on government content.<br />

32 Non-exclusive licences on <strong>the</strong> use of raw<br />

government <strong>in</strong>formation should be effectively<br />

implemented, stimulat<strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g value-added<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures. Hav<strong>in</strong>g stimulated valueadded<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures, <strong>the</strong> Government<br />

should not undercut <strong>the</strong>se. The panel of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

representatives should monitor this<br />

33 The Government should ensure that <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Information Review are widely<br />

promulgated, and HMSO should propagate best<br />

practice case studies on <strong>the</strong> respective roles of<br />

public and private sectors <strong>in</strong> relation to publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as technology and <strong>the</strong> marketplace changes<br />

34 Publishers should actively support and<br />

government ensure <strong>the</strong> extension and<br />

improvement of <strong>the</strong> Information Asset Register to<br />

constitute a comprehensive resource discovery<br />

service usable by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

17.2.3 Copyright protection<br />

Copyright protection <strong>in</strong> a digital world is a major<br />

challenge: digital copies are perfect and highspeed<br />

networks and file shar<strong>in</strong>g services such<br />

as Napster have <strong>the</strong> ability to dissem<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

content across <strong>the</strong> world <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stant. The<br />

effects of copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement and file shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on <strong>the</strong> recorded music <strong>in</strong>dustry are well known,<br />

though not all its recent poor performance can<br />

be ascribed to this.<br />

19 Government should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK’s strong<br />

legal framework of publishers’ <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />

rights over all content and encourage UK and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational enforcement schemes for <strong>the</strong> ><br />

115


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

worldwide protection of content (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> selfregulatory<br />

remedial system for digital content)<br />

cover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “take down” and “put back”<br />

schemes.<br />

23 Publishers must be diligent about contractually<br />

secur<strong>in</strong>g rights and also mak<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

transparent oversight of those that <strong>the</strong>y do own. It<br />

will be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important for publishers to be<br />

able to track <strong>the</strong>ir assets across multiple platforms<br />

and to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>the</strong>y have.<br />

17.2.4 Standards<br />

There are challeng<strong>in</strong>g issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

standards – how open will standards be on new<br />

platforms? How costly will it be to deal with<br />

mistakes about back<strong>in</strong>g particular standards too<br />

soon? Will o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries, such as film,<br />

television and <strong>in</strong>formation technology set<br />

standards which publishers will <strong>the</strong>n have to<br />

follow e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of Digital Rights<br />

Management?<br />

Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees also expressed<br />

frustration with <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re were different<br />

technical standards for <strong>in</strong>teractive content on<br />

<strong>the</strong> three digital television platforms (Digital<br />

Satellite Television, Digital Cable Television and<br />

Digital Terrestrial Television) which added to<br />

author<strong>in</strong>g costs and made it difficult to reuse<br />

Web content, especially on Sky Digital which<br />

has a proprietary standard.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

21 The relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors must create<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry-wide <strong>in</strong>teroperable eXtensible Markup<br />

Language (XML)-based standards for content<br />

creation which can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to ensure new<br />

platforms are supported.<br />

17.2.5 Journal archiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Traditionally, <strong>the</strong> academic librarian has been<br />

responsible for archiv<strong>in</strong>g of pr<strong>in</strong>ted material. In<br />

fact, this is one of <strong>the</strong> prime purposes of <strong>the</strong><br />

librarian. However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> digital age, librarians<br />

are see<strong>in</strong>g this as a function of <strong>the</strong> publisher.<br />

This is fraught with problems as publishers,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g commercial organisations, are not an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent archive for material that may be of<br />

national importance. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> cost to<br />

publishers of not only archiv<strong>in</strong>g digital content,<br />

but more importantly ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a record of<br />

who has paid for access to <strong>the</strong> content and<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g sure that <strong>the</strong>y get access to it ad<br />

<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itum is enormous.<br />

This also favours <strong>the</strong> large commercial<br />

publishers over some of <strong>the</strong> smaller and not-forprofit<br />

ones. Indeed, one large publisher has<br />

already announced that it will provide an archive<br />

to all of its content. This is a large commercial<br />

company us<strong>in</strong>g its vast resources to raise <strong>the</strong><br />

barrier of entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> market and make life<br />

more difficult for its smaller competitors with<br />

much less resources.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

22 If <strong>the</strong> UK is to protect access to research material<br />

and ensure that small and not-for-profit publishers<br />

are not unfairly disadvantaged, <strong>the</strong> archiv<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

digital research should be organised at a national<br />

level by Government. A content repository<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r with access rights should be created by<br />

Government and <strong>in</strong>dustry for use by national<br />

academic and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

17.2.6 Gatekeep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The slow rate of take up of broadband <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

UK compared with o<strong>the</strong>r parts of Europe and<br />

<strong>the</strong> US is widely ascribed to BT’s exploitation<br />

of its monopoly of <strong>the</strong> local loop <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

<strong>the</strong> speed and price of ADSL deployment<br />

(although it is also true that cable companies<br />

have been quite slow <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g cable<br />

modem services). This must not be allowed<br />

to happen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of o<strong>the</strong>r platforms, such<br />

as wireless networks, <strong>in</strong> future.<br />

Some <strong>in</strong>terviewees also compla<strong>in</strong>ed of <strong>the</strong><br />

high cost of gett<strong>in</strong>g a presence on <strong>the</strong> Sky<br />

Digital <strong>in</strong>teractive platform and of arrogance on<br />

<strong>the</strong> part of BskyB and <strong>the</strong> cable companies.<br />

The Government and <strong>in</strong>dependent regulators<br />

need to ensure that platform operators and<br />

gatekeepers do not exploit monopoly or<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant positions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision and cost of<br />

<strong>the</strong> means of reach<strong>in</strong>g customers <strong>in</strong> a way that<br />

hampers competition or h<strong>in</strong>ders take up.<br />

116


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

17.2.7 Taxation<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry’s competitive<br />

strengths is <strong>the</strong> historical commitment of <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

government not to tax pr<strong>in</strong>ted knowledge and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, as <strong>the</strong> common good – <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

education, democracy, <strong>the</strong> general welfare and<br />

<strong>the</strong> economy – is best served <strong>the</strong>reby. This has<br />

been successfully defended with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

European Union, where <strong>the</strong>re are vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regimes <strong>in</strong> force <strong>in</strong> relation to VAT on pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

products. It is vital that this cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be<br />

defended.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> related problem of how, and if,<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>formation and content should be<br />

taxed is a considerable challenge. This<br />

encompasses not simply <strong>the</strong> rate of taxation,<br />

but how clearly and consistently <strong>the</strong> rules are<br />

applied, (for example to pr<strong>in</strong>t/electronic bundles)<br />

and what account is taken of <strong>the</strong> global nature<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Internet <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> rules on place of<br />

orig<strong>in</strong> and place of purchase of content. Failure<br />

to deal with this issue is affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation –<br />

UK publishers are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to bundle pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

with electronic ra<strong>the</strong>r than develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

electronic-only services and fail<strong>in</strong>g to reap <strong>the</strong><br />

cost benefits of mov<strong>in</strong>g fully digital. It could cost<br />

jobs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK as journal publishers, for<br />

example, move to <strong>the</strong> USA or elsewhere outside<br />

<strong>the</strong> EU <strong>in</strong> order to compete with US publishers<br />

on a level taxation play<strong>in</strong>g field. As electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation serves <strong>the</strong> same purpose <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to <strong>the</strong> common good as <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t, it<br />

seems to us that it should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same way.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

16 The Government’s policy not to tax knowledge <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> common good and <strong>the</strong> EU<br />

derogation on VAT, which constitute a key<br />

competitive strength for <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, must be defended to <strong>the</strong> utmost.<br />

17 Electronic <strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>the</strong> same purpose as<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t and should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same way. VAT at full rate on electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation discourages economic efficiency and<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation and places UK firms at a competitive<br />

disadvantage to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> USA. Failure to<br />

recognise <strong>the</strong> equivalence of purpose of<br />

electronic and pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong>formation is putt<strong>in</strong>g UK<br />

companies at a severe disadvantage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

ability to compete and <strong>in</strong>novate.<br />

18 The Government should commission a study to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong> impact of tax<strong>in</strong>g<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>formation on costs, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />

<strong>the</strong> location of publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />

17.2.8 Regulation of digital content<br />

Many different regulations are emanat<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK government and <strong>the</strong> EU which affect<br />

publishers <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

products and services. These <strong>in</strong>clude rules on<br />

distance sell<strong>in</strong>g and data protection, and on <strong>the</strong><br />

liability for content <strong>in</strong> relation to libel, obscenity<br />

etc. There is a fear that <strong>the</strong> more proactive<br />

philosophy on privacy and o<strong>the</strong>r matters<br />

prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> much of Europe will particularly<br />

disadvantage UK publishers, who are more<br />

directly <strong>in</strong> competition with US ones, who<br />

operate under more relaxed conditions,<br />

because of <strong>the</strong> common language.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

20 Government to commit at both national and EU<br />

level to consistent and light-touch regulation of<br />

new platforms <strong>in</strong> relation to:<br />

• Content and liability (libel, obscenity, etc)<br />

• Privacy and data protection<br />

17.2.9 Caution on new platforms<br />

The effect of <strong>the</strong> experiences of CD-ROM and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet on <strong>the</strong> will<strong>in</strong>gness of publishers to<br />

develop content for new platforms <strong>in</strong> advance of<br />

a proven demand for <strong>the</strong>m. This is clearly<br />

illustrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low expectations shown <strong>in</strong> our<br />

questionnaire for opportunities presented by 3G<br />

and digital TV, and to a lesser extent,<br />

broadband (see SWOTs section).<br />

There is a danger that publishers could miss<br />

<strong>the</strong> next wave of technology through an<br />

understandable caution about throw<strong>in</strong>g good<br />

money after bad. The same chart (Figure 17.1)<br />

which demonstrates <strong>the</strong> positive view on<br />

opportunities <strong>in</strong> e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies also<br />

shows a very low level of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> third ><br />

117


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

Figure 17.1<br />

Launch of new products and services<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services<br />

to overseas markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats)<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances<br />

Growth of high speed<br />

networks/broadband<br />

Growth of digital television<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks<br />

Improved exploitation of rights<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />

create new products and services<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />

optimise editorial and production processes<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to<br />

optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and market<strong>in</strong>g processes<br />

Closer relationship with end customer<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Source Pira Questionnaire<br />

generation wireless technologies and digital<br />

television, though somewhat higher <strong>in</strong><br />

broadband <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three-year timeframe and<br />

much greater <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10-year one. While <strong>in</strong> one<br />

sense this is realistic <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> maturity of<br />

<strong>the</strong> technology (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of 3G and possibly<br />

Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e) and <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

consumer penetration (<strong>in</strong> all cases), it could also<br />

lead to publishers leav<strong>in</strong>g development plans<br />

too late. This could compromise platform take<br />

up, as most consumers are not drawn to<br />

technologies as such, but to <strong>the</strong> pleasures and<br />

<strong>the</strong> profit <strong>the</strong>y can derive from us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

There are some well-founded concerns on <strong>the</strong><br />

part of publishers about new platforms’<br />

potential. Several consumer magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

publishers have experimented with television,<br />

and have found that low programme budgets<br />

(now lower than ever <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period of audience<br />

fragmentation) endanger <strong>the</strong>ir offl<strong>in</strong>e brand.<br />

One publisher told us: "Programme budgets<br />

are fall<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> danger is that cheap shoddy<br />

programmes would damage <strong>the</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

brand. We did a series for a pay TV channel.<br />

They wanted to cont<strong>in</strong>ue – we said no, unless<br />

<strong>the</strong>y could quadruple <strong>the</strong> budget, and that was<br />

when budgets were 10 times higher than now.”<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r said: “We feel that TV and magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

are consumed very differently and that<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>es require very high production values<br />

if translated to TV programmes if <strong>the</strong>y aren’t to<br />

disappo<strong>in</strong>t readers and harm <strong>the</strong> brand. That is<br />

very expensive.”<br />

It is difficult to predict what people will do with<br />

new platforms, but that can be an argument for<br />

experimentation and <strong>in</strong>novation ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

caution, as long as you don’t damage your core<br />

assets. Who seriously foresaw <strong>the</strong> massive<br />

growth of text messag<strong>in</strong>g? Who predicted<br />

success stories on <strong>the</strong> Internet such as eBay or<br />

Friendsreunited.com? Book publishers<br />

committed what may be called <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>stalled<br />

base’ error with CD-ROM – if millions of people<br />

had CD-ROM drives on <strong>the</strong>ir PCs, <strong>the</strong>re must<br />

be a market for CD-ROMs. With broadband,<br />

publishers are wait<strong>in</strong>g for take up to reach<br />

critical mass before seriously develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

content. People did not have to pay (or perceive<br />

<strong>the</strong>y had to pay) for <strong>the</strong> CD-ROM drives on <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

PCs – PC makers put <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> order for<br />

software to be loaded. People do have to make<br />

a conscious decision to buy broadband and<br />

good, unique content will be a major driver.<br />

118


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

CHAPTER<br />

18<br />

The conclusions and proposed action plan<br />

18.1 Conclusions<br />

The underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators for <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry show that it is fundamentally strong and<br />

vibrant. For example, new title output,<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue and exports are all up.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry has also come through a very<br />

turbulent time with <strong>the</strong> explosion of <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

and all <strong>the</strong> threats that that posed.<br />

Pira’s study concludes that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry has<br />

three challenges to meet as it moves towards<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a knowledge economy:<br />

• The challenge of susta<strong>in</strong>able growth: to<br />

compete on a global scale, UK companies<br />

must have a strong home base from which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can develop a truly global bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry must also adapt to and<br />

become a central feature of a rich, competitive<br />

knowledge economy.<br />

• The challenge of changes <strong>in</strong> customer<br />

behaviour: publishers need to improve <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>ir end-customers and offer<br />

better, more targeted services to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

advertisers.<br />

• The challenge of digital media: <strong>the</strong> competitive<br />

landscape is chang<strong>in</strong>g and many regulatory<br />

and technological challenges lie ahead.<br />

The responses to our questionnaire,<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews, focus groups and workshop <strong>in</strong>dicate:<br />

• The <strong>in</strong>dustry is aware of <strong>the</strong> need to launch<br />

new products and services and get closer to<br />

<strong>the</strong> end-customer. It also recognises <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> place e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

technologies to improve processes.<br />

• The extension of <strong>in</strong>ternational reach and<br />

scale are seen as important to a greater or<br />

lesser degree <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sectors, depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir focus.<br />

• There is a considerable degree of caution<br />

shown towards <strong>the</strong> opportunities that could be<br />

offered by high-speed networks; those offered<br />

by 3G wireless networks and digital television<br />

are not yet on <strong>the</strong> radar screen.<br />

Spann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> challenges<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g faced and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s exist<strong>in</strong>g progress<br />

to meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> key to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry. Pira believes <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry must:<br />

• Make <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ks between <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

– <strong>the</strong> desire to create new products and<br />

services while gett<strong>in</strong>g closer to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />

– <strong>the</strong> use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technology to<br />

improve bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices while prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for <strong>the</strong> future<br />

– <strong>the</strong> opportunities new channels, such as<br />

broadband, 3G Wireless and <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

television, offer to get close to <strong>the</strong> endcustomer<br />

and <strong>in</strong>crease revenues.<br />

• Reap <strong>the</strong> benefits across <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

by apply<strong>in</strong>g more broadly <strong>the</strong> partial<br />

responses to some of <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual sectors.<br />

• Migrate at a manageable pace to serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

knowledge economy, where content drives<br />

services to generate revenues from all<br />

channels at low-cost of re-purpos<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Realise that all <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g, should be treated as content<br />

which can potentially earn revenues.<br />

• Resist complacency and too cautious an<br />

approach to <strong>the</strong> opportunities presented by<br />

new platforms.<br />

In conclusion, publish<strong>in</strong>g is an <strong>in</strong>dustry without<br />

boundaries, which has a strong future and can<br />

be fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ned by undertak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

actions described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section. But,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g an action plan that is<br />

not implemented effectively, so we need a<br />

mechanism for do<strong>in</strong>g so.<br />

Action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

35 The <strong>DTI</strong> and UKPM to create a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

implementation team to ensure effective<br />

follow up to this Action Plan.<br />

18.2 Proposed action plan<br />

Each action po<strong>in</strong>t can become <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />

of one of four group<strong>in</strong>gs: <strong>the</strong> Government; <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry; <strong>the</strong> trade associations; or a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

responsibility. Figure 18.1 gives an <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />

120


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Figure 18.1 Division of responsibility for<br />

each action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Government <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

High<br />

Government<br />

action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

where Pira considers responsibility should lie<br />

for each of <strong>the</strong> action po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

The action po<strong>in</strong>ts have also been ranked<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> importance that Pira attaches<br />

to <strong>the</strong>m to achieve <strong>the</strong> state of preparedness of<br />

<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry to exploit <strong>the</strong> scenario<br />

described careful transition to knowledge<br />

economy. These rank<strong>in</strong>gs are essential,<br />

necessary and desirable. Their order with<strong>in</strong><br />

each category is simply a reflection of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

order with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

Industry<br />

action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Trade association <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

High government<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

1 7 14 18 19 20<br />

24 26 27 29 30 31<br />

32 33 34<br />

2 5 12 16 17 22<br />

28 35<br />

8 9 11 13 21 23 3 4 6 10 15 25<br />

Industry <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

Trade association<br />

action po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

High<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t actions<br />

High trade<br />

association <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

18.2.1 Essential actions<br />

Competition law<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 1 (Section 15.3.3)<br />

If <strong>the</strong> Government wants to encourage globally<br />

powerful UK-based publish<strong>in</strong>g and media<br />

companies it must consider relax<strong>in</strong>g competition<br />

law <strong>in</strong> how it treats <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g sector and<br />

re-exam<strong>in</strong>e its def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g sector market.<br />

A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g Sector Skills<br />

Council (SSC)<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 2 (Section 15.4)<br />

As <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry moves ever closer to<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g new products and services that use<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g degrees of <strong>in</strong>tegration of content with<br />

value-added services, <strong>the</strong> need for specialists <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and technology will<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease. This will require <strong>the</strong> ability to attract<br />

people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and cont<strong>in</strong>ually tra<strong>in</strong><br />

and re-tra<strong>in</strong> staff. A strong publish<strong>in</strong>g skillsbased<br />

SSC must be established urgently to<br />

ensure that <strong>the</strong> skills reflect those required <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> knowledge economy.<br />

Statistics<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 5 (Section 15.6)<br />

In order to capture <strong>the</strong> essential dynamics of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> statistics:<br />

– <strong>DTI</strong>, ONS and UKPM to collaborate with<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r and representatives of <strong>the</strong> EU<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> representations to EU<br />

on NACE revisions (Eurostat 2006). This is<br />

an urgent requirement as <strong>the</strong>re is an<br />

autumn deadl<strong>in</strong>e for submissions and <strong>the</strong><br />

121


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itions could be <strong>in</strong> force for<br />

more than a decade.<br />

– Study to be conducted based on <strong>the</strong> gap<br />

analysis from this report to arrive at detailed<br />

recommendations on <strong>the</strong> data that needs to<br />

be collected.<br />

– Government and UKPM to collaborate <strong>in</strong> an<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative to communicate to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of supply<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

Customer relationships<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 8 (Section 16.3)<br />

Publishers need to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> Digital Rights<br />

Management, Content Management Systems<br />

and Customer Relationship Management<br />

technology better to understand and service<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir end-users behaviour. This will assist <strong>in</strong><br />

both sell<strong>in</strong>g products and services, as well as<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g better able to target customers for<br />

advertisers and direct market<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 12 (Section 16.3)<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> trade associations, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

and supply cha<strong>in</strong> partners need to accelerate<br />

adoption of e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives and<br />

standards to facilitate <strong>in</strong>formation exchange<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The BBC<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 26 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Recognis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> BBC brand to<br />

<strong>in</strong>spire consumer trust <strong>in</strong> new media, <strong>the</strong> BBC<br />

should harness this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of a vibrant<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent multimedia sector by<br />

commission<strong>in</strong>g significant amounts of<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e/broadband content from <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

producers. This should be monitored by<br />

OFCOM.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 27 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Independent research should be commissioned<br />

to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> impact of cross-promotion from<br />

BBC broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services to its onl<strong>in</strong>e content<br />

and suggest remedial action if necessary.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 28 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Electronic learn<strong>in</strong>g credits should be large<br />

enough to prevent BBC from dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

market. PA and BESA to encourage private<br />

sector collaboration to provide a coherent<br />

managed learn<strong>in</strong>g offer<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 29 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

DFES to ensure its bidd<strong>in</strong>g processes for<br />

digital curriculum activities are open and<br />

well publicised.<br />

Public sector <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 30 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Government should establish as soon<br />

as possible an advisory panel to HMSO,<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g of senior private and public sector<br />

representatives to monitor policies and practices<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector <strong>in</strong>formation trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environment as recommended <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cross<br />

Cutt<strong>in</strong>g Review of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 32 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Non-exclusive licences on <strong>the</strong> use of raw<br />

government <strong>in</strong>formation should be rolled-out,<br />

stimulat<strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g value-added publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ventures. Hav<strong>in</strong>g stimulated value-added<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g ventures, <strong>the</strong> Government should not<br />

undercut <strong>the</strong>se. The panel of <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

representatives should monitor this.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 33 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

HMSO should propagate best practice case<br />

studies on <strong>the</strong> respective roles of public and<br />

private sectors <strong>in</strong> relation to publish<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

technology and <strong>the</strong> marketplace changes.<br />

Open standards and assets<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 7 (Section 15.7)<br />

Recognis<strong>in</strong>g that it is not <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

government to mandate standards, it should<br />

use its <strong>in</strong>fluence as far as possible to support<br />

open standards for content provision on all<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g and new platforms.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 21 (Section 17.2.4)<br />

The relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors must create<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry-wide <strong>in</strong>teroperable eXtensible Markup<br />

Language (XML)-based standards for content<br />

creation which can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed to ensure<br />

new platforms are supported.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 23 (Section 17.2.3)<br />

Publishers must be diligent about contractually<br />

secur<strong>in</strong>g rights and also mak<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />

122


Issues for competitiveness<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

have transparent oversight of those that <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

own. It will be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important for<br />

publishers to be<br />

able to track <strong>the</strong>ir assets across multiple<br />

platforms and to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong> rights<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have.<br />

Taxation<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 16 (Section 17.2.7)<br />

The Government’s policy not to tax knowledge<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> common good and <strong>the</strong> EU<br />

derogation on VAT, which constitute a key<br />

competitive strength for <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, must be defended to <strong>the</strong> utmost.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 17 (Section 17.2.7)<br />

Electronic <strong>in</strong>formation has <strong>the</strong> same purpose as<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t and should be treated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same way. VAT at full rate on electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation discourages economic efficiency<br />

and <strong>in</strong>novation and places UK firms at a<br />

competitive disadvantage to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US.<br />

Failure to recognise <strong>the</strong> equivalence of purpose<br />

of electronic and pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong>formation is putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

UK companies at a severe disadvantage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

ability to compete and <strong>in</strong>novate.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 18 (Section 17.2.7)<br />

The Government should commission a study to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong> impact of tax<strong>in</strong>g<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>formation on costs, <strong>in</strong>novation and<br />

<strong>the</strong> location of publish<strong>in</strong>g activity.<br />

Piracy<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 24 (Section 15.3.5)<br />

Government must keep up high level pressure<br />

on foreign governments to prevent piracy and to<br />

take action aga<strong>in</strong>st copyright violators.<br />

Competitiveness Analysis Project<br />

implementation<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 35 (Section 18.1)<br />

The <strong>DTI</strong> and UKPM to create a jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

implementation team to ensure effective<br />

follow up to this Action Plan.<br />

18.2.2 Necessary actions<br />

Career development<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 3 (Section 15.4)<br />

Proper career development paths us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry-standard qualifications (driven by SSC)<br />

must be put <strong>in</strong>to place. This will encourage<br />

young graduates <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry who will be<br />

more easily able to compare <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry with o<strong>the</strong>r potential careers.<br />

Technology awareness<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 6 (Section 15.7)<br />

Sector-specific/common technology awareness<br />

forums and o<strong>the</strong>r methods to communicate best<br />

practice to be devised on key technology<br />

opportunities aimed at both strategic and<br />

technical levels and audiences.<br />

Data analysis<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 9 (Section 16.1)<br />

Industry must implement strategies throughout<br />

companies and trade associations to collect<br />

data about how <strong>in</strong>formation is used and its<br />

context, as well as <strong>the</strong> current sales and<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 11 (Section 16.3)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r routes to <strong>the</strong> customer must be<br />

developed and/or streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

protect diversity and <strong>in</strong>novation and to support<br />

frequency of purchase. For example:<br />

– Professional alternative home delivery<br />

services should be created<br />

– Subscriptions should be extended<br />

– Targeted direct mail should be exploited<br />

and supported by Internet-based CRM<br />

techniques.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 13 (Section 16.4)<br />

Industry and distribution trade associations<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to support <strong>in</strong>dependent CTNs<br />

with promotional campaigns, clubs and<br />

supply cha<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novations.<br />

123


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Issues for competitiveness<br />

Public sector <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 31 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Government to implement <strong>in</strong>teroperable<br />

standards on government content.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 34 (Section 17.2.2)<br />

Publishers should actively support and<br />

government ensure <strong>the</strong> extension and<br />

improvement of <strong>the</strong> Information Asset Register<br />

to constitute a comprehensive resource<br />

discovery service usable by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Regulation and copyright protection<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 19 (Section 17.2.3)<br />

Government should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK’s strong<br />

legal protection of publishers’ <strong>in</strong>tellectual<br />

property rights over all content and encourage<br />

UK and <strong>in</strong>ternational enforcement schemes for<br />

<strong>the</strong> worldwide protection of content (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> self-regulatory remedial system for digital<br />

content) cover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> “take down” and “put<br />

back” schemes.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 20 (Section 17.2.8)<br />

Government to commit at both national and EU<br />

level to consistent and light regulation of new<br />

platforms <strong>in</strong> relation to:<br />

– Content and liability (libel, obscenity, etc.)<br />

– Privacy and data protection.<br />

18.2.3 Desirable actions<br />

Profile<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 4 (Section 15.4)<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dustry should undertake market research<br />

to understand how it is perceived by end<br />

customers, government and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

This should focus on determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong><br />

current perception of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry is by <strong>the</strong>se<br />

groups and which particular expertise of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry can be targeted to which<br />

groups and develop<strong>in</strong>g a plan for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

awareness among <strong>the</strong>se groups.<br />

Supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 10 (Section 16.3)<br />

Relevant <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors to lobby for carefully<br />

managed <strong>in</strong>troduction of competition <strong>in</strong> mail<br />

services to meet cost/efficiency goals without<br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g universal delivery.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 14 (Section 16.4)<br />

Supermarkets must <strong>in</strong>clude magaz<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

newspapers and books <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supermarket<br />

code. This code also needs to be made<br />

more robust.<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 15 (Section 16.4)<br />

Build on exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> book supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> report ‘Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply<br />

Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize’ – use this opportunity to<br />

<strong>in</strong>ject fresh momentum.<br />

Digital archive<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 22 (Section 17.2.5)<br />

In order for <strong>the</strong> UK to protect access to<br />

important research material and to ensure that<br />

small and not-for-profit publishers are not<br />

unfairly disadvantaged, <strong>the</strong> archiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of digital research should be organised at a<br />

national level by government. A content<br />

repository toge<strong>the</strong>r with access rights should be<br />

created by government and <strong>in</strong>dustry for use by<br />

national academic and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

Copyright licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Action po<strong>in</strong>t 25 (Section 16.1)<br />

In order to provide a simple way for customers<br />

to use content legally, UKPM should explore<br />

<strong>the</strong> possible creation of a s<strong>in</strong>gle body to issue<br />

blanket licences.<br />

124


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

PART1<br />

Appendices<br />

125


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Appendix A<br />

Methodology<br />

The project has been divided <strong>in</strong>to stages:<br />

Stage one<br />

1 Background desk research, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation of a number of previous studies<br />

and reports that have been carried out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

broad subject area of publish<strong>in</strong>g. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude material from trade associations,<br />

private sector research bodies, universities<br />

and government and government-funded<br />

sources as well as company reports and<br />

accounts. A list of <strong>the</strong> major reports consulted<br />

is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendix D. This does not<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude numerous news articles consulted, <strong>in</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t and on <strong>the</strong> Internet.<br />

2 Selection of <strong>the</strong> quantitative <strong>in</strong>dicators by<br />

which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s relative performance may<br />

be judged. This was followed by <strong>the</strong><br />

collection and analysis of <strong>the</strong> data<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> chosen <strong>in</strong>dicators and<br />

gaps identified. The process and its results<br />

are exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 1.<br />

Stage two<br />

1 A series of <strong>in</strong>terviews was carried out with<br />

representatives of trade associations and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r bodies, and ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion formers’ with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry, ma<strong>in</strong>ly senior company executives.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>terviews aimed to ensure that <strong>the</strong><br />

broad range of issues of major concern to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry were identified as early as possible <strong>in</strong><br />

order to <strong>in</strong>form what was to follow. In all, 50<br />

face to face <strong>in</strong>terviews were completed.<br />

2 A questionnaire was devised and sent out to<br />

450 selected recipients. 69 questionnaires<br />

were returned, with <strong>the</strong> responses be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

representative of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended profile.<br />

3 The sample was chosen through profil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

relative size of <strong>the</strong> different sub sectors with<strong>in</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g and obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g names of proposed<br />

recipients from <strong>the</strong> relevant trade<br />

associations. We were unable to select a<br />

sample that we could be confident would yield<br />

quantitative results which could be grossed up<br />

to give a statistically valid overall picture of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry. This is for several reasons, <strong>the</strong> most<br />

important of which is that <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong><br />

universe of companies is not known. The<br />

questionnaire was ma<strong>in</strong>ly qualitative,<br />

attempt<strong>in</strong>g to reveal <strong>the</strong> major competitive<br />

issues and concerns of companies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry. Quantitative data was requested<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>cipally <strong>in</strong> order to cross-tabulate o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

results. The text is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Appendix C.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> questionnaire are referred<br />

to <strong>in</strong> various places throughout <strong>the</strong> report as<br />

<strong>the</strong> relevant issues are discussed.<br />

4 A SWOT analysis was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

results of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews and questionnaires,<br />

and this was tested with focus groups<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>dustry and trade association<br />

representatives.<br />

5 Three scenarios were devised and tested with<br />

<strong>the</strong> same focus groups.<br />

Stage three<br />

1 A draft Action Plan was drawn up and debated<br />

at a workshop of <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>DTI</strong><br />

representatives.<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al report was drafted.<br />

A list of <strong>the</strong> participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />

(<strong>in</strong>terviewees, questionnaire respondents, focus<br />

groups and workshop attendees) is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

Appendix B.<br />

Note on forecast methodology<br />

The forecasts <strong>in</strong> this report are based on a four<br />

step procedure.<br />

1 Quantitative forecasts are only produced<br />

where <strong>the</strong>re is sufficient historical data to<br />

produce mean<strong>in</strong>gful results which can be<br />

tested for <strong>the</strong>ir accuracy and reliability.<br />

2 We use error-correction models, to construct<br />

forecasts which are built from two<br />

components: long-run trends and short-run<br />

deviations from <strong>the</strong> trend. The components<br />

are constructed us<strong>in</strong>g historical data on<br />

important economic and social variables such<br />

as GDP and household expenditure.<br />

126


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

3 In our central predictions, we assume that <strong>the</strong><br />

growth of <strong>the</strong> UK economy, prices and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

important variables matches <strong>the</strong> forecasts<br />

produced by <strong>the</strong> UK Treasury.<br />

4. In all <strong>the</strong> charts with forecasts, we have built<br />

and estimated <strong>the</strong> models underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

forecasts. Where possible we compare our<br />

forecasts to those produced by experts and<br />

use <strong>the</strong>ir ‘high’ and ‘low’ figures to provide<br />

brackets for our own estimates. In <strong>the</strong><br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cases, we have produced our own<br />

‘high’ and ‘low’ forecasts.<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>itional Note<br />

Throughout <strong>the</strong> report <strong>the</strong> terms ‘publisher’ and<br />

‘publish<strong>in</strong>g’ occur many times. In <strong>the</strong> sections <strong>in</strong><br />

Part 1 which analyse statistical <strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

terms are def<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> sources<br />

used and comments are made with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sections on <strong>the</strong> specific def<strong>in</strong>itions.<br />

Elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report, we <strong>in</strong>tend <strong>the</strong> terms<br />

to be understood as those bus<strong>in</strong>esses whose<br />

primary activity is <strong>the</strong> acquisition, selection,<br />

arrangement and manipulation of content for<br />

sale and for <strong>the</strong> purposes of secur<strong>in</strong>g audiences<br />

for advertisers. This content may or may not be<br />

dissem<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> a pr<strong>in</strong>ted form and can <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

all k<strong>in</strong>ds of electronic and audio-visual formats,<br />

and even events and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, though <strong>the</strong> study<br />

specifically excludes companies whose primary<br />

activity is <strong>in</strong> broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. It also excludes<br />

music publishers. We are well aware that all<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds of companies are now engaged <strong>in</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t or on <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />

for example retailers, airl<strong>in</strong>es, banks,<br />

recruitment agencies and estate agents. There<br />

are also Web-based <strong>in</strong>termediaries such as<br />

Lastm<strong>in</strong>ute.com or FriendsReunited, which also<br />

engage <strong>in</strong> content acquisition and manipulation,<br />

and perhaps could be described as Internet<br />

publishers, but we do not def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>m as such.<br />

Their activities have important implications for<br />

<strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, which are explored <strong>in</strong><br />

this report, but <strong>in</strong> our view, <strong>the</strong>y do not form part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry sector under scrut<strong>in</strong>y here.<br />

><br />

127


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Appendix B<br />

Participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />

Interviewees<br />

Archant (formerly Eastern Counties<br />

Newspapers Group)<br />

Associated Newspapers<br />

Attic Futura (UK)<br />

Batch<br />

Book Data<br />

BBC<br />

BBC Worldwide Ltd<br />

BioMedCentral Ltd<br />

Blacket Turner & Company Ltd<br />

Book Industry Communication<br />

CAB International<br />

Cambridge University Press<br />

CMP<br />

COMAG<br />

Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Economist Group<br />

EMAP Communications<br />

Factiva<br />

Fish4<br />

Gale Group<br />

The Guardian<br />

Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />

Hello! Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Hemm<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />

Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Incisive Media<br />

Ingenta plc<br />

Institute of Physics<br />

Johnston Press plc<br />

Little, Brown & Co (UK)<br />

Macmillan<br />

MarketForce (UK)<br />

Midland News Association<br />

Moonlight <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

The National Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Company<br />

Nelson Thornes<br />

Newsquest Media Group<br />

Northcliffe Newspapers<br />

Pearson plc<br />

Pengu<strong>in</strong> Group UK<br />

Scholastic<br />

The Random House Group<br />

Reed Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information<br />

Regional Independent Media<br />

Reuters<br />

The Scottish Newspaper Society<br />

The Stationery Office<br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror<br />

J Whitaker<br />

William Reed <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

Attended <strong>the</strong> focus groups and/or workshop<br />

Advanstar Communications Ltd<br />

Archant<br />

Association of Learned and Professional<br />

Society Publishers (ALPSP)<br />

Association of Newspaper and Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Wholesalers (ANMW)<br />

Attic Futura (UK)<br />

Booksellers Association<br />

British Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Industries Federation (BPIF)<br />

Cube3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Directory and Database Publishers Association<br />

(DPA)<br />

Dennis <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Department of Trade and Industry<br />

Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Services Ltd (EPS)<br />

FT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

Guardian Unlimited<br />

Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />

Hello! Magaz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Hemm<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />

Hodder Headl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd<br />

John Murray Ltd<br />

Kilborn Associates<br />

National Federation of Retail Newsagents<br />

(NFRN)<br />

Nelson Thornes<br />

Newbury News<br />

News International<br />

Newspaper Publishers Association<br />

Newsquest Media Group<br />

Newtrade <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Northcliffe Newspapers<br />

Oxford Brookes University<br />

Pearson Education<br />

Periodical Publishers Association<br />

Public Sector <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

Publishers Association<br />

128


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> NTO<br />

QCA<br />

The Random House Group<br />

The Stationery Office (TSO)<br />

Thomson<br />

Tudor Rose<br />

William Reed <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

Questionnaire respondents<br />

Advanstar Communications Ltd<br />

Agenda <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Alpha Science International Ltd<br />

AP Information Services<br />

The Barnsley Chronicle Ltd<br />

Berg Publishers<br />

The British Library<br />

The British Museum Company<br />

CABI <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Communications Team<br />

Constable & Rob<strong>in</strong>son Ltd<br />

Cube3 <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Dak<strong>in</strong>i Books Ltd<br />

David Fulton Publishers<br />

Dunferml<strong>in</strong>e Press Group<br />

EMAP Consumer Media<br />

Ford & Mason Ltd<br />

FT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

G J Palmer & Sons<br />

Guiton Group Ltd<br />

Haymarket Magaz<strong>in</strong>es Ltd<br />

Haymarket <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

Henry Stewart Publications<br />

Hirst, Kidd & Rennie Ltd<br />

<strong>Home</strong>builder Publications Ltd<br />

Hopscotch Educational <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

Icom Publications Ltd<br />

Institution of Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eers<br />

Institute of Physics <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Inter Varsity Press<br />

Islamic Texts Society<br />

IWA <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd<br />

Jessica K<strong>in</strong>gsley Publishers<br />

Johnston Press plc<br />

Kent Messenger Ltd<br />

Kogan <strong>Page</strong>/Earthscan<br />

MCB Up Ltd<br />

MMT Ltd<br />

Nature <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Group<br />

Network Education Press Ltd<br />

New Media<br />

Newsquest Media Group<br />

Newhall Publications Ltd<br />

Newtrade <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Northcliffe Newspapers Group Ltd<br />

Open University Press<br />

The Orion <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Group Ltd<br />

Pearson plc<br />

Picker<strong>in</strong>g & Chatto Publishers<br />

ProQuest Information & Learn<strong>in</strong>g Ltd (formerly<br />

Chadwyck-Healey)<br />

Pryor Publications<br />

Public Sector <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

The Redan Company<br />

Reed Educational and Professional <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

The Royal Society<br />

The Royal Society of Chemistry<br />

SCM-Canterbury Press<br />

Simon & Schuster (UK) Ltd<br />

Society for Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

Thoemmes Press<br />

Thomas Telford Ltd<br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>ity Mirror plc<br />

Tudor Rose<br />

Unity Media plc<br />

Usborne <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Ltd<br />

VNU Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment Media UK Ltd<br />

W<strong>in</strong>dhorse Publications<br />

><br />

129


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Appendix C<br />

Text of questionnaire<br />

Company name__________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Company address _______________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Contact name ___________________________________________________________________<br />

Position ________________________________________________________________________<br />

Department _____________________________________________________________________<br />

Telephone ________________________________ Fax_________________________________<br />

Email address ___________________________________________________________________<br />

Please state whe<strong>the</strong>r you are respond<strong>in</strong>g for your whole company or on behalf of your division:<br />

■ Company<br />

■ Division<br />

Section 1 About your company/division<br />

A Which products and services does<br />

your company/division produce? (Tick<br />

all that apply)<br />

■ Regional daily<br />

■ Regional Sunday<br />

■ Local weekly<br />

Books<br />

■ Consumer adult<br />

■ Consumer children’s<br />

■ Academic/professional<br />

■ STM<br />

■ Schools<br />

■ ELT<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify __________________<br />

Journals<br />

■ Academic<br />

■ Professional<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify __________________<br />

Newspapers<br />

Paid-for<br />

■ National daily<br />

■ National Sunday<br />

Free<br />

■ Daily<br />

■ Sunday<br />

■ Weekly<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />

■ Consumer<br />

■ Bus<strong>in</strong>ess to bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

■ Contract<br />

■ Special <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify _______________________<br />

Newsletters<br />

■ Advertis<strong>in</strong>g supported<br />

■ Subscription only<br />

Directories<br />

■ Advertis<strong>in</strong>g supported<br />

■ Subscription only<br />

130


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

■ Databases (o<strong>the</strong>r than onl<strong>in</strong>e versions of<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted products)<br />

■ Conferences or exhibitions<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

■ Audio books<br />

■ Contract pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Leaflets/<strong>in</strong>serts/direct mail<br />

■ Mas<strong>the</strong>ad programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation not covered elsewhere,<br />

eg brokerage, customised <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

services, f<strong>in</strong>ancial data services<br />

■ Information solutions eg software, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

management consultancy<br />

■ Web-based services o<strong>the</strong>r than versions of<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted product, eg <strong>in</strong>fomediary, portal, vortal<br />

■ List rental<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ___________________<br />

B What is <strong>the</strong> approximate turnover of<br />

your company/division derived from <strong>the</strong><br />

products/services <strong>in</strong> Section 1A<br />

■ Under £1m<br />

■ Between £1m and £5m<br />

■ Between £5m and £25m<br />

■ Between £25m and £50m<br />

■ Between £50m and £100m<br />

■ Between £100m and 500m<br />

■ More than £500m<br />

C Approximately how many full-time<br />

employees does your company/<br />

division have?<br />

______________________________________<br />

D What is <strong>the</strong> approximate source of<br />

your revenues of <strong>the</strong> products and<br />

services <strong>in</strong> Section 1A? (tick one)<br />

■ 100% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g; 0% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />

■ 75% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 25% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />

■ 50% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 50% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />

■ 25% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 75% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />

■ 0% Advertis<strong>in</strong>g 100% sales/subscriptions/o<strong>the</strong>r fees<br />

What percentage, if any, of your<br />

advertis<strong>in</strong>g revenue is from<br />

leaflets/<strong>in</strong>serts/direct mail?_____________%<br />

What percentage, if any, of your total<br />

revenue is from contract pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g?_______%<br />

What percentage, if any, of your total<br />

revenue is derived from <strong>the</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g/<br />

sale of rights? _______________________%<br />

E Approximately what proportion of your<br />

company’s/division’s earn<strong>in</strong>gs come<br />

from overseas?<br />

■ Less than 5%<br />

■ 5%-25%<br />

■ 25%-50%<br />

■ More than 50%<br />

F Platforms/delivery media – what is <strong>the</strong><br />

approximate percentage breakdown of<br />

revenues from <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>t _______ %<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e ______ %<br />

CD-ROM ____ %<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r _______ % (please specify ____________)<br />

G Approximately what percentage of<br />

your turnover is devoted to capital<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment?<br />

_____________%<br />

H Approximately what percentage of<br />

your turnover is devoted to new product<br />

development?<br />

_____________%<br />

><br />

131


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 2 About your markets and <strong>the</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess environment<br />

A Are <strong>the</strong> end users of your products<br />

and services: (tick one)<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly consumers<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>stitutions (eg schools, universities)<br />

B Orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>ternational revenues:<br />

(tick one)<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly EU (exclud<strong>in</strong>g UK)<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly North America<br />

■ Ma<strong>in</strong>ly from o<strong>the</strong>r areas, please specify ________.<br />

C Over <strong>the</strong> last five years, has<br />

competition with<strong>in</strong> your market area:<br />

■ Increased<br />

■ Decreased<br />

■ Rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable<br />

D If competition has <strong>in</strong>creased, what has<br />

been <strong>the</strong> major source?<br />

■ New entrants to market from with<strong>in</strong> UK<br />

■ Established UK-based companies<br />

■ Competition from players with<strong>in</strong> your value cha<strong>in</strong><br />

New entrants to market from:<br />

■ EU<br />

■ US<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________<br />

Established foreign-based companies, <strong>in</strong><br />

■ EU<br />

■ US<br />

■ O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________<br />

E Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = does not constra<strong>in</strong>, 5 = constra<strong>in</strong>s severely), <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

to what extent each item constra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> expansion of your bus<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Slow growth of market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Low profitability of sector ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Regulation affect<strong>in</strong>g your bus<strong>in</strong>ess, please specify ____________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Inadequate enforcement of copyright/piracy ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Lack of access to capital ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Barriers to access to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Distribution difficulties ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Lack of access to retail channels or space ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Difficulty <strong>in</strong> staff recruitment or retention ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Skills shortages ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ris<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g costs, please specify ______________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Cost of content acquisition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Overseas competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> local market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Availability of experienced middle/senior managers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

132


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

F Supply cha<strong>in</strong> problems: us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not problematic,<br />

5 = severely problematic) <strong>in</strong>dicate to what extent <strong>the</strong> items below cause<br />

problems <strong>in</strong> your supply cha<strong>in</strong>.<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Concentration of ownership of paper supply ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Inflexibility or cost of pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Lack of systems <strong>in</strong>teroperability with suppliers or customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Creation of electronic content ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Wastage/returns ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Distribution of electronic content ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Inflexibility or cost of distribution ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Postal service efficiency and cost ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Concentration of retail<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

G Impact of social change and globalisation: do you see <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g changes as<br />

positive/negative/neutral for your bus<strong>in</strong>ess?<br />

Factor Positive Negative Neutral<br />

The com<strong>in</strong>g of a generation accustomed to <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>in</strong>teractive technologies ■ ■ ■<br />

Age<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> population ■ ■ ■<br />

Spread of English language proficiency <strong>in</strong>ternationally ■ ■ ■<br />

Increased demands on consumers’ time, money and attention ■ ■ ■<br />

The <strong>in</strong>ternationalisation of <strong>the</strong> labour market ■ ■ ■<br />

Higher educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment of <strong>the</strong> population ■ ■ ■<br />

European Union enlargement and <strong>in</strong>tegration ■ ■ ■<br />

Accelerat<strong>in</strong>g world trade and <strong>in</strong>vestment liberalisation ■ ■ ■<br />

Capacity to deliver content worldwide over high speed networks ■ ■ ■<br />

The creation of <strong>the</strong> Eurozone ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■<br />

H Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least likely, 5 = most likely), <strong>in</strong>dicate which activities<br />

you <strong>in</strong>tend to take to improve your competitiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g three years,<br />

a) assum<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued steady economic growth; and, b) assum<strong>in</strong>g a general<br />

economic recession.<br />

a) Assum<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued steady economic growth<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Cut production costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Cut distribution costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquire o<strong>the</strong>r companies or titles ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Expand <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Expand <strong>in</strong>to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ga<strong>in</strong> closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Enhance brand recognition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

133


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

More effective management of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights/assets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquisition and exploitation of new rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Investment <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Enhance e-commerce/e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Increase capital <strong>in</strong>vestment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

b) Assum<strong>in</strong>g a general economic recession<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Cut production costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Cut distribution costs ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquire o<strong>the</strong>r companies or titles ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Expand <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Expand <strong>in</strong>to overseas markets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ga<strong>in</strong> closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Enhance brand recognition ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

More effective management of exist<strong>in</strong>g rights/assets ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquisition and exploitation of new rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Investment <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Enhance e-commerce/e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Increase capital <strong>in</strong>vestment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

134


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 3 Use of e-commerce and ICT<br />

A Which of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g facilities does your company have or plan to have?<br />

Currently Have plans Have no<br />

have to deploy plans to<br />

<strong>in</strong> near deploy<br />

future<br />

A website for <strong>in</strong>formation purposes only ■ ■ ■<br />

A website for content delivery ■ ■ ■<br />

The facility to allow <strong>the</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g of orders onl<strong>in</strong>e to suppliers ■ ■ ■<br />

The facility to allow <strong>the</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g of customer orders onl<strong>in</strong>e ■ ■ ■<br />

The facility to allow electronic payment by customers ■ ■ ■<br />

The facility to pay suppliers electronically ■ ■ ■<br />

B Which of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g IT systems does your company have or plan to have?<br />

Currently Have plans Have no<br />

have to deploy plans to<br />

<strong>in</strong> near deploy<br />

future<br />

An <strong>in</strong>tranet ■ ■ ■<br />

The ability to accept advertisement placement electronically ■ ■ ■<br />

A content management system ■ ■ ■<br />

A rights management system ■ ■ ■<br />

A customer relationship management system ■ ■ ■<br />

XML for data <strong>in</strong>terchange ■ ■ ■<br />

XML for media-<strong>in</strong>dependent storage ■ ■ ■<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>t-on-demand ■ ■ ■<br />

Fully digital workflow ■ ■ ■<br />

><br />

135


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 4 Expectations of <strong>the</strong> future<br />

A Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = greatest) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> potential of each<br />

of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for your bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> a) <strong>the</strong> next three years<br />

b) <strong>the</strong> next 10 years?<br />

3 years<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to overseas<br />

markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of digital television ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Improved exploitation of rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise editorial and production processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-commerce technologies to optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

10 years<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Launch of new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Extension of exist<strong>in</strong>g products and services to overseas<br />

markets (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales of formats) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Acquisitions, mergers or alliances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Overseas acquisitions, mergers or alliances ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of high speed networks/broadband ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of digital television ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Growth of 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Improved exploitation of rights ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to create new products and services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess technologies to optimise editorial and production processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Use of e-commerce technologies to optimise order<strong>in</strong>g, sales and<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g processes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Closer relationship with end customer ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

136


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

B Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = greatest) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> potential threats to<br />

your company’s success a) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next three years? B) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next ten years?<br />

3 years<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Economic recession ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Technological change eg development of broadband and 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

New entrants to your market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Stricter regulation, please specify __________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Taxation changes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

10 years<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Economic recession ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Technological change eg development of broadband and 3G wireless networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Piracy/copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Retention of rights by authors/agents/<strong>in</strong>stitutions ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

New entrants to your market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Dis<strong>in</strong>termediation by parts of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g value cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Competition from exist<strong>in</strong>g customers ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Overseas competition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g imports ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Shifts <strong>in</strong> consumer spend<strong>in</strong>g patterns or changes <strong>in</strong> consumer behaviour ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distribution of advertis<strong>in</strong>g expenditure<br />

(eg from pr<strong>in</strong>t to TV, direct mail or onl<strong>in</strong>e) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Stricter regulation, please specify __________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Taxation changes ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Price discount<strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Government as <strong>in</strong>formation provider/publisher ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r, please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

137


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 5 Role of <strong>the</strong> Government/public sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g market<br />

A Do you regard <strong>the</strong> government <strong>in</strong><br />

its role as <strong>in</strong>formation supplier and<br />

publisher as<br />

■ A competitor<br />

■ A partner<br />

■ Both<br />

■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

B Are <strong>the</strong>re any publish<strong>in</strong>g projects you<br />

have pursued as a result of co-operation<br />

with a government department or public<br />

sector body?<br />

■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />

■ No<br />

C Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have not<br />

pursued or curtailed as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g activities of a government<br />

department or public sector body?<br />

■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />

■ No<br />

D Have you experienced problems <strong>in</strong><br />

access<strong>in</strong>g Government material for<br />

commercial reuse s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> policy on<br />

<strong>the</strong> reuse of government <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

was liberalised <strong>in</strong> 1999?<br />

■ Yes<br />

■ No<br />

E Have you taken out an HMSO Click-<br />

Use Licence which enables <strong>the</strong> re-use of<br />

a wide range of government <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

free of charge?<br />

■ Yes<br />

■ No<br />

■ Be<strong>in</strong>g considered<br />

■ Not aware<br />

138


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 6 Role of <strong>the</strong> BBC <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g market<br />

A Do you regard <strong>the</strong> BBC as:<br />

■ A competitor<br />

■ A partner<br />

■ Both<br />

■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

B Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have<br />

pursued as a result of co-operation with<br />

<strong>the</strong> BBC?<br />

■ Yes, please specify: _______________________<br />

■ No<br />

C Are <strong>the</strong>re any projects you have not<br />

pursued or curtailed as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />

activities of <strong>the</strong> BBC?<br />

■ Yes, please specify ________________________<br />

■ No<br />

D Do you regard any of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BBC activities as an opportunity for<br />

partnership or product development for<br />

your company? Tick all that apply<br />

■ Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Onl<strong>in</strong>e services<br />

■ Interactive television<br />

■ Licens<strong>in</strong>g or merchandis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Ability to use television or radio as crosspromotion<br />

vehicle<br />

■ None<br />

E Do you regard any of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BBC activities as giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to problems<br />

for your company? Tick all that apply<br />

■ Book publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Magaz<strong>in</strong>e publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Onl<strong>in</strong>e services<br />

■ Interactive television<br />

■ Licens<strong>in</strong>g or merchandis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

■ Ability to use television or radio as crosspromotion<br />

vehicle<br />

■ None<br />

><br />

139


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 7 Role of <strong>in</strong>dustry and Government <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

competitiveness<br />

A Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale 1 to 5 (1 = least important, 5 = most important) <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> positive<br />

steps <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry could jo<strong>in</strong>tly take to improve its competitiveness.<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Jo<strong>in</strong>t export<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Incentives to improve <strong>the</strong> efficiency of production ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Data standardisation projects to improve supply cha<strong>in</strong> efficiency ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustry wide e-commerce <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> retail trade ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Collective <strong>in</strong>itiatives to improve <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry’s relationships with<br />

advertisers and <strong>the</strong> advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated management development tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Better technological advice ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

B Us<strong>in</strong>g a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = least, 5 = best) <strong>in</strong>dicate how best <strong>the</strong> government can<br />

assist <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Change exist<strong>in</strong>g regulation, please specify __________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Stimulate market demand for new services ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

End uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> relation to VAT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Entry to <strong>the</strong> Euro ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Expand access to broadband networks ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ensure that EU merger policy is transparent and consistent ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ensure fair media ownership framework ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ensure fair competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong> ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> flexible labour market ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Improve <strong>the</strong> collection of statistics relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Undertake targeted export <strong>in</strong>itiatives ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Invest <strong>in</strong> workforce tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and education ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> levels of fund<strong>in</strong>g for schools and libraries ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Ensure a favourable tax environment ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

Undertake exemplary action <strong>in</strong> procurement and use of <strong>in</strong>formation ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r please specify ____________________________________ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

140


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Section 8 International competitiveness<br />

If you feel you have <strong>in</strong>sufficient knowledge of foreign publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries, please<br />

disregard this question.<br />

A Choose one country (o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />

UK) which you consider possesses <strong>the</strong><br />

most competitive publish<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

with<strong>in</strong> your sector of <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

■ Name of country __________________________<br />

C Does your company benchmark itself<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st national or <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

competitors?<br />

■ National<br />

■ International<br />

■ Both<br />

■ Nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

B Rate your agreement with <strong>the</strong>se statements <strong>in</strong> relation to your chosen country’s<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g companies:<br />

Strongly Slightly Slightly Strongly<br />

agree agree disagree disagree<br />

1 Skill levels are higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

2 UK companies are keener to <strong>in</strong>vest ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

3 UK companies are more creative and <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

<strong>in</strong> new product development ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

4 UK companies are quicker to adopt new technologies ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

5 The UK has a more favourable regulatory environment ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

6 UK companies are more responsive to customers ■ ■ ■ ■<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g page is left blank for any additional comments you may wish to make.<br />

Thank you. Your help is much appreciated.<br />

Please email your completed questionnaire to sueo@pira.co.uk, alternatively<br />

return by fax to 01372 802249.<br />

><br />

141


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Appendix D<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> sources consulted<br />

Government and trade associations<br />

Department of Culture, Media and Sport<br />

• Creative Industries M<strong>in</strong>isterial Steer<strong>in</strong>g Group: 2nd<br />

• Creative Industries Mapp<strong>in</strong>g Document<br />

(March 2001)<br />

• Creative Industries Export Advisory Group: Exports:<br />

our Hidden Potential (November 1999)<br />

• Internet Inquiry: Snapshot of a Roll<strong>in</strong>g Wave<br />

(Feb. 2000)<br />

Office of National Statistics<br />

• Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, 1993-2000<br />

• PRODCOM reports, 1993-2000<br />

• Consumer Trends, 2001<br />

• UK Trade <strong>in</strong> Services, 2000<br />

• Standard Industrial Classification UK SIC 1992<br />

• Mat<strong>the</strong>w Barnes, Jonathan Haskel, Andrew Ross:<br />

Understand<strong>in</strong>g Productivity: new <strong>in</strong>sights from <strong>the</strong><br />

ONS bus<strong>in</strong>ess databank (April 2001)<br />

Department of Trade and Industry<br />

• UK Competitiveness Indicators Second<br />

Edition, 2001<br />

• Digital Content Action Plan (Feb 2000)<br />

• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Clusters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK (Feb 2001)<br />

• <strong>DTI</strong>/OST Information, Communication and Media<br />

(ICM) Panel: The Future and Development of<br />

Information Relationships (2001)<br />

• The Advance of Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, (Feb 1999)<br />

Publishers Association<br />

• UK Book Industry <strong>in</strong> Statistics,2000<br />

• UK publishers export sales by sector 1990-99<br />

• Trends <strong>in</strong> Journal Subscriptions, 1998<br />

• PA Brief on <strong>the</strong> Digital Curriculum, December 2000<br />

Newspaper Society<br />

• The Regional Press Factbook, March 2001<br />

• Consumer’s Choice IV, 2001<br />

• Reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Regions, 1997<br />

Periodical Publishers’ Association<br />

• The Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Handbook<br />

• Executive Summary (various issues)<br />

• B2B Media: opportunities for growth, May 2000<br />

PPA/Wessenden Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• The Future of Retail<strong>in</strong>g: an overview of pressures<br />

on <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

• Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Retail<strong>in</strong>g 2001<br />

PPA/Blakes Market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Magaz<strong>in</strong>es as Brands, May 1998<br />

EU Commission<br />

• The Competitiveness of <strong>the</strong> European Union<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Industries, 2000<br />

• Second Community Innovations Survey, 1998<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r organisations<br />

• Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Information Forum: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Bus<strong>in</strong>ess,<br />

<strong>the</strong> UK bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communication <strong>in</strong>dustry 2001<br />

• <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> National Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Organisation: Skills<br />

Foresight Report, April 2002<br />

• Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Association: Advertis<strong>in</strong>g Statistics<br />

Yearbook 2001 (NTC Publications)<br />

• Screen Digest/ABN AMRO Mediaphile 2010<br />

• Book Market<strong>in</strong>g Ltd: Book Facts 2000<br />

• Learned Information: The European Onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Information Market, Jan 2002<br />

142


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

• K<strong>in</strong>gston University/DPA 8th annual Directory and<br />

Database Publishers Association Survey, 2000<br />

• ALPSP/PA Journal <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Statistics Survey<br />

(TFPL Ltd)<br />

• Seymour: Launches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Market,<br />

Jan 2000<br />

• The Prospect Shop: Periodical publishers, 2001<br />

• Keynote: The Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Press 2001<br />

• McK<strong>in</strong>sey Quarterly: Magaz<strong>in</strong>es’ home companion<br />

Q1 2001<br />

• FIPP: World Magaz<strong>in</strong>e Trends 2001<br />

• World Association of Newspapers: World Press<br />

Trends 2001<br />

• Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival <strong>in</strong> UK<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g by Richard Disney, Jonathan Haskel<br />

and Ylva Heden<br />

• Ocean Consult<strong>in</strong>g: Media Brands 2002<br />

• Book Industry Communication: Returns: <strong>the</strong> New<br />

Process – A Code of Practice, July 2000<br />

• KPMG: Unlock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Supply Cha<strong>in</strong>’s Hidden Prize,<br />

Feb 1998<br />

• Paul Dobson: The impact of proposed national<br />

distribution developments on <strong>the</strong> UK regional press<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry (‘The Dobson Report’), October 2000<br />

• British Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Industries Federation: Pr<strong>in</strong>t 21<br />

(June 2001)<br />

• Bookseller Publications: Book Retail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong><br />

2001<br />

Pira International<br />

• The Future of Pr<strong>in</strong>t (2000)<br />

• The Impact of E-commerce on <strong>the</strong> UK pr<strong>in</strong>t and<br />

publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries (May 2001)<br />

• The Future of Pr<strong>in</strong>t and Digital Media <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />

Age (April 2002)<br />

143


NPA<br />

Brita<strong>in</strong>’s National Press<br />

Members of <strong>the</strong> project control board<br />

Department of Trade and Industry<br />

Chris Mat<strong>the</strong>ws, Director,<br />

<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> & New Media<br />

Susan Moore, Policy Advisor &<br />

Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Analyst, <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> & New Media<br />

Nick Rudoe, Statistical Advisor,<br />

Industry Economics and Statistics Directorate<br />

Michael Crosse, Economic Advisor,<br />

Industry Economics and Statistics Directorate<br />

Pira International<br />

Michael Hancock, Manag<strong>in</strong>g Director<br />

Richard Gray, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Manager<br />

Publishers Association<br />

Ronnie Williams, Chief Executive<br />

Periodical Publishers Association<br />

Ian Locks, Chief Executive<br />

Newspaper Publishers Association<br />

Steve Oram, Director<br />

Newspaper Society<br />

David Newell, Director<br />

Adviser to <strong>the</strong> <strong>DTI</strong><br />

David Worlock, Chairman,<br />

Electronic <strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Services Ltd<br />

Our thanks for assistance from<br />

Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers;<br />

Directory Publishers Association; Independent Publishers Guild;<br />

Digital Content Forum; British Internet Publishers Association;<br />

plus <strong>the</strong> large number of publishers and o<strong>the</strong>r key players<br />

across <strong>the</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors who gave valuable time,<br />

help and advice through <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews, focus groups,<br />

workshops, questionnaires, etc.<br />

Mike Casey and Susan Sparks,<br />

Pira International Report Authors.


<strong>Publish<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge economy<br />

Competitiveness analysis of <strong>the</strong> UK publish<strong>in</strong>g media sector<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> report<br />

Department of Trade & Industry<br />

151 Buck<strong>in</strong>gham Palace Road,<br />

London SW1H 9SS, UK<br />

T +44 (0)20 7215 5000<br />

W www.dti.gov.uk<br />

Pira International Ltd<br />

Randalls Road, Lea<strong>the</strong>rhead,<br />

Surrey KT22 7RU, UK<br />

T +44 (0)1372 802000<br />

E publish@pira.co.uk<br />

W www.piranet.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!