05.11.2014 Views

SHOT Annual Report 2009 - Serious Hazards of Transfusion

SHOT Annual Report 2009 - Serious Hazards of Transfusion

SHOT Annual Report 2009 - Serious Hazards of Transfusion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Major Morbidity<br />

There was one patient that required venesection post transfusion.<br />

Case 3<br />

Entire adult unit <strong>of</strong> red cells given to infant<br />

A request was made for top-up transfusion for a sick 1-year-old child with an Hb <strong>of</strong> 9.0 g/dL. A dose <strong>of</strong> 110 mL was<br />

calculated and prescribed. An adult unit <strong>of</strong> blood was issued but nursing staff did not see the volume prescribed and<br />

transfused the entire unit <strong>of</strong> blood (230 mL). This transfusion took place between midnight and 08.00. The error was<br />

detected by laboratory staff when the patient’s post-transfusion Hb was 19 g/dL. The child required venesection.<br />

The reporting hospital stated that the prescription chart could be improved to allow clearer prescription for paediatric<br />

blood transfusion volumes. However, it is essential that all staff working in paediatrics are aware <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong><br />

paediatric prescribing, based on body weight or surface area, whether administering blood components or pharmaceutical<br />

agents.<br />

Case 4 below describes the delayed and/or under-transfusion <strong>of</strong> a very anaemic neonate. It was thought that the<br />

prolonged anaemia may have contributed to long-term morbidity in this infant.<br />

Case 4<br />

Delay in transfusing very anaemic neonate has long term consequences<br />

A baby was delivered by CS and appeared unwell. There had been a massive transplacental haemorrhage and the<br />

infant’s Hb was 4 g/dL. The clinicians did not know this result until 2 hours post delivery. There was then a further<br />

delay <strong>of</strong> 4 hours before the baby was transfused, owing to misunderstandings and communication failures between<br />

clinicians, portering staff and the transfusion laboratory. The team did not seem to know that neonatal ‘flying squad’<br />

blood was available, nor did they ask for emergency blood even though the child was deteriorating. Blood was not<br />

prescribed. A sample was eventually sent but there were portering delays both in taking the sample and collecting the<br />

units. The total delay before transfusion commenced was over 4 hours. The baby became very sick and was transferred<br />

to a tertiary centre. There was long-term morbidity with developmental delay which may have been in part due to the<br />

prolonged period <strong>of</strong> extreme anaemia.<br />

Figure 8<br />

Cases <strong>of</strong> inappropriate and unnecessary transfusion 1996–<strong>2009</strong><br />

100<br />

90<br />

92<br />

80<br />

76<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> reports<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

56<br />

67<br />

51 50<br />

20<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 0 0 1<br />

1996–97 1997–98 1998–99 1999–00<br />

2000–01<br />

2001–02<br />

(15 months)<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007 2008 <strong>2009</strong><br />

Year <strong>of</strong> report<br />

68 8. Inappropriate and Unnecessary <strong>Transfusion</strong> (I&U)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!