Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO
Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO
Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SO-TN-ESL-SM-GS-0001<br />
Issue 1.a<br />
Date: 31/08/2006<br />
SMOS level 2 processor<br />
Soil moisture <strong>ATBD</strong><br />
Figure 12 : MEAN_WEF: image<br />
Figure 13 : MEAN_WEF: semi log cross-cut<br />
The MEAN_WEF must be normalized to unity integral and applied to land cover in order to compute mean fractions.<br />
The above description corresponds to the MEAN_WEF being defined over a FG geographical grid expressed in km.<br />
The following formulation can be used for its actual computation:<br />
MEAN _ WEF<br />
MEAN _ WEF<br />
MEAN _ WEF<br />
earth<br />
( ρ ) = C + WEF ⎜ ⋅ ⎟ for ρ ∈[ 0, C ]<br />
earth<br />
( ρ )<br />
earth<br />
= C<br />
MWEF 2<br />
MWEF 2<br />
for ρ<br />
( ρ ) = 0 otherwise<br />
earth<br />
A<br />
earth<br />
⎛ ρ<br />
⎜<br />
⎝ C<br />
MWEF1<br />
⎤<br />
∈<br />
⎥<br />
C<br />
⎦<br />
MWEF<br />
π ⎞<br />
⎟ earth<br />
CWEF1<br />
⎠<br />
WEF _ SIZE ⎤<br />
1,<br />
2 ⎥<br />
⎦<br />
MWEF1<br />
As for WEF, the MEAN_WEF will be used as a tabulated form of the above equation and thus defined in TGRD.<br />
The values for C MWEF1 (40 km) and C MWEF2 (0.02) are supplied in UPF.<br />
Both WEF and MEAN_WEF are thus used to compute aggregated fractions from the land cover array over a fine grid<br />
area. It will be seen that the land cover includes two classifications: a complementary one, and a superimposed<br />
supplementary one, which accounts for possible NPE conditions as well as the topographic mask.<br />
• Since the complementary classification covers the whole area, rules are necessary to "blend in" the<br />
supplementary classification. This topic is addressed in the decision tree section.<br />
• In a later step, the WEF will be used to compute reference parameter values for every quantity relevant and for<br />
each view for building the forward models. This is also addressed in the decision tree section.<br />
3.2.3 Decision tree<br />
3.2.3.1 Content of the decision tree section<br />
• The decision tree procedure begins with determining the weighted mean aggregated fractions FM 0 which are to<br />
be considered in the decision tree, as well as those FM which contribute to modelled radiometric contributions.<br />
• A battery of tests is defined, based on a series of thresholds concerning the magnitude of various fractions, and<br />
allows defining the branches for the 1rst stage of the decision tree;<br />
• The fraction (s) and model (s) selected for retrieval or default contributions are selected for each branch;<br />
• From auxiliary data, reference values of either fixed parameters or a priori constraints are obtained for every<br />
relevant fraction of the pixel.<br />
• Options (stage 2 set of branches) are finally chosen for the retrieval, concerning the number and nature of<br />
parameters to be actually retrieved as well as a priori standard deviations.<br />
3.2.3.2 Computing aggregated fractions<br />
Eq 71<br />
.<br />
74