07.11.2014 Views

Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO

Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO

Algorithm Theoretical Based Document (ATBD) - CESBIO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SO-TN-ESL-SM-GS-0001<br />

Issue 1.a<br />

Date: 31/08/2006<br />

SMOS level 2 processor<br />

Soil moisture <strong>ATBD</strong><br />

Figure 12 : MEAN_WEF: image<br />

Figure 13 : MEAN_WEF: semi log cross-cut<br />

The MEAN_WEF must be normalized to unity integral and applied to land cover in order to compute mean fractions.<br />

The above description corresponds to the MEAN_WEF being defined over a FG geographical grid expressed in km.<br />

The following formulation can be used for its actual computation:<br />

MEAN _ WEF<br />

MEAN _ WEF<br />

MEAN _ WEF<br />

earth<br />

( ρ ) = C + WEF ⎜ ⋅ ⎟ for ρ ∈[ 0, C ]<br />

earth<br />

( ρ )<br />

earth<br />

= C<br />

MWEF 2<br />

MWEF 2<br />

for ρ<br />

( ρ ) = 0 otherwise<br />

earth<br />

A<br />

earth<br />

⎛ ρ<br />

⎜<br />

⎝ C<br />

MWEF1<br />

⎤<br />

∈<br />

⎥<br />

C<br />

⎦<br />

MWEF<br />

π ⎞<br />

⎟ earth<br />

CWEF1<br />

⎠<br />

WEF _ SIZE ⎤<br />

1,<br />

2 ⎥<br />

⎦<br />

MWEF1<br />

As for WEF, the MEAN_WEF will be used as a tabulated form of the above equation and thus defined in TGRD.<br />

The values for C MWEF1 (40 km) and C MWEF2 (0.02) are supplied in UPF.<br />

Both WEF and MEAN_WEF are thus used to compute aggregated fractions from the land cover array over a fine grid<br />

area. It will be seen that the land cover includes two classifications: a complementary one, and a superimposed<br />

supplementary one, which accounts for possible NPE conditions as well as the topographic mask.<br />

• Since the complementary classification covers the whole area, rules are necessary to "blend in" the<br />

supplementary classification. This topic is addressed in the decision tree section.<br />

• In a later step, the WEF will be used to compute reference parameter values for every quantity relevant and for<br />

each view for building the forward models. This is also addressed in the decision tree section.<br />

3.2.3 Decision tree<br />

3.2.3.1 Content of the decision tree section<br />

• The decision tree procedure begins with determining the weighted mean aggregated fractions FM 0 which are to<br />

be considered in the decision tree, as well as those FM which contribute to modelled radiometric contributions.<br />

• A battery of tests is defined, based on a series of thresholds concerning the magnitude of various fractions, and<br />

allows defining the branches for the 1rst stage of the decision tree;<br />

• The fraction (s) and model (s) selected for retrieval or default contributions are selected for each branch;<br />

• From auxiliary data, reference values of either fixed parameters or a priori constraints are obtained for every<br />

relevant fraction of the pixel.<br />

• Options (stage 2 set of branches) are finally chosen for the retrieval, concerning the number and nature of<br />

parameters to be actually retrieved as well as a priori standard deviations.<br />

3.2.3.2 Computing aggregated fractions<br />

Eq 71<br />

.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!