09.11.2014 Views

LISALISA - iucaa

LISALISA - iucaa

LISALISA - iucaa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1 Scientific Objectives<br />

1.1.2 The nature of gravitational waves in general relativity<br />

Tidal accelerations.<br />

We remarked above that the observable effects of gravity lie in the tidal forces. A gravitational<br />

wave detector would not respond to the acceleration produced by the wave (as given by ∇Φ),<br />

since the whole detector would fall freely in this field, by the equivalence principle. Detectors<br />

work only because they sense the changes in this acceleration across them. If two parts of a<br />

detector are separated by a vector ⃗ L, then it responds to a differential acceleration of order<br />

⃗L · ∇(∇Φ) ∼ LΦ/λ 2 . (1.3)<br />

Since we have seen that Φ ∼ hc 2 (dropping the indices of h αβ in order to simplify this order-ofmagnitude<br />

argument), the differential acceleration is of order Lω 2 h.<br />

If the detector is a solid body, such as the bar detectors described in Section 2.2.1, the differential<br />

acceleration will be resisted by internal elastic stresses, and the resulting mechanical motion can<br />

be complex. Bars are made so that they will “ring” for a long time after a gravitational wave<br />

passes, making detection easier. If the detector consists of separated masses that respond to the<br />

gravitational wave like free particles, then the situation is easier to analyse. This is the case for<br />

interferometers, including LISA.<br />

For two free masses separated by the vector ⃗ L, the differential acceleration given by Equation 1.3<br />

leads to an equation for the change in their separation δ ⃗ L, of order<br />

d 2 δL<br />

dt 2 ∼ Lω 2 h.<br />

Since the time-derivatives on the left-hand-side just bring down factors of ω, we arrive at the<br />

very simple equation δL/L ∼ h. A careful derivation shows that this is exact with a further<br />

factor of 2:<br />

δL<br />

L = 1 h. (1.4)<br />

2<br />

Here we make contact with the geometrical interpretation of general relativity. The distances L<br />

and δL should be interpreted as proper distances, the actual distances that a meter-stick would<br />

measure at a given time. Then we see that h is indeed a metric, a distance measure: as a<br />

gravitational wave passes, it stretches and shrinks the proper distance between two free bodies.<br />

This equation also explains why interferometric detectors should be made large: the technical<br />

problem is always to measure the small distance change δL, and for a given wave amplitude h<br />

this distance change increases in proportion to L.<br />

Polarization of gravitational waves.<br />

We have managed to discover much about gravitational waves by ignoring all the indices and<br />

the full complexity of the field equations, but this approach eventually reaches its limit. What<br />

we cannot discover without indices is how the differential accelerations depend on the direction<br />

to the source of the wave. Here there are two important results that we simply quote without<br />

proof:<br />

• Gravitational waves are transverse. Like electromagnetic waves, they act only in a plane<br />

perpendicular to their direction of propagation. This means that the two separated masses<br />

will experience the maximum relative distance change if they are perpendicular to the<br />

direction to the source; if they lie along that direction there will be no change δL.<br />

13-9-2000 11:47 12 Corrected version 1.04

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!