14.11.2014 Views

A Right to Media? Lorie M. Graham - Columbia Law School

A Right to Media? Lorie M. Graham - Columbia Law School

A Right to Media? Lorie M. Graham - Columbia Law School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2010] A RIGHT TO MEDIA? 437<br />

This right <strong>to</strong> media is centered on the right <strong>to</strong> freedom of<br />

expression and the related right <strong>to</strong> seek and receive information. As<br />

discussed more fully below, the rights <strong>to</strong> freedom of expression and<br />

information have long been recognized as fundamental rights. 22<br />

Because media is the main source of expression and information for<br />

the public, freedom of expression and information applies with<br />

particular force <strong>to</strong> the media. 23 As one regional treaty body notes, “[i]t<br />

is the mass media that make the exercise of freedom of expression<br />

[and information] a reality.” 24 The Special Rapporteur on the<br />

Promotion and Protection of the <strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> Freedom of Opinion and<br />

Expression explains further that “one of the best guarantees of<br />

respect for the rights <strong>to</strong> freedom of expression and information lies in<br />

the existence of independent media, electronic and print, in which<br />

ownership is diversified.” 25<br />

While Article 16 of the UNDRIP appears <strong>to</strong> be an iteration of<br />

the rights of freedom of expression and information, it is<br />

distinguished from these rights as articulated in prior international<br />

documents in that it is formulated from an indigenous perspective.<br />

This is so for the reasons previously noted; these fundamental rights<br />

<strong>to</strong> information and expression have been consistently denied <strong>to</strong><br />

indigenous peoples. One way in which indigenous peoples have been<br />

restricted from exercising these rights has been through their<br />

exclusion in media. That is <strong>to</strong> say that mainstream media sources,<br />

controlled by non-indigenous companies or states, were directed in<br />

such a way as <strong>to</strong> disenfranchise and discriminate against indigenous<br />

peoples, both by denying them a voice in the public domain and by<br />

discussed at the international expert group meeting on indigenous languages)<br />

[hereinafter Legal Framework and Indigenous Languages].<br />

22. See infra Part III. While the right <strong>to</strong> receive information remains<br />

unsettled in some domestic spheres, it is a firmly established right under<br />

international conventional law. See infra note 45 and accompanying text.<br />

23. Article 19: Global Campaign for Free Expression, Note on the<br />

Indonesian Press <strong>Law</strong> 2–3 (2004).<br />

24. Compulsory Membership in an Association Prescribed by <strong>Law</strong> for the<br />

Practice of Journalism (Arts. 13 and 29, American Convention on Human <strong>Right</strong>s),<br />

Advisory Opinion OC-5/85, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Series A) No. 5, para. 34 (1985)<br />

[hereinafter Compulsory Membership].<br />

25. ECOSOC, Comm’n on Human <strong>Right</strong>s, Question of the Human <strong>Right</strong>s of<br />

All Persons Subjected <strong>to</strong> Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, 17, U.N. Doc.<br />

E/CN.4/1998/40 (Jan. 28, 1998) (prepared by Mr. Abid Hussain) [hereinafter<br />

Human <strong>Right</strong>s During Imprisonment].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!