move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NEWS ANALYSIS FEATURE<br />
Justin Grainge<br />
Chris Burchell, manager of Southern which takes <strong>over</strong><br />
Gatwick Express from May 2008.<br />
Brian Cooke, chairman of London<br />
TravelWatch, says he is pleased the lengthy<br />
discussions had finally come <strong>to</strong> a head.<br />
‘Ho<strong>we</strong>ver it is a real shame that this will take <strong>to</strong><br />
the end of next year <strong>to</strong> achieve,’ he adds. ‘A more<br />
strategic approach <strong>to</strong> allocating the rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />
might have solved this problem much, much<br />
earlier. The precise benefits for passengers are<br />
still unclear – it will depend on the detail of the<br />
proposed timetable changes.’<br />
But passengers in West Sussex are less<br />
pleased. Trevor Tupper of the Arun Valley <strong>Rail</strong><br />
Users Association says: ‘Three years ago the<br />
Strategic <strong>Rail</strong> Authority put forward proposals<br />
that would have given Gatwick six express trains<br />
an hour rather than four and all of these would<br />
have carried on in<strong>to</strong> Sussex improving journey<br />
times from London <strong>to</strong> places like Worthing,<br />
Littlehamp<strong>to</strong>n, Chichester and Bognor Regis. It<br />
would also have improved journey times and<br />
frequency <strong>to</strong> Gatwick from these <strong>to</strong>wns as <strong>we</strong>ll<br />
as from Portsmouth, Fareham and<br />
Southamp<strong>to</strong>n. All hope of these improvements<br />
has now been dashed.’<br />
‘We’re quite pleased,’ admits Stuart Condie<br />
of BAA, who led the determined behind-thescenes<br />
lobbying campaign <strong>to</strong> the G<strong>over</strong>nment.<br />
BAA’s planning and surface access direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />
comments: ‘We have retained the service<br />
elements that our passengers need. It’s still four<br />
times an hour, it’s still non-s<strong>to</strong>p and it’s still with<br />
airport branding. ‘We put a lot of time and effort<br />
in<strong>to</strong> <strong>get</strong>ting our views across. But there is still a<br />
lot of detail <strong>to</strong> be worked out. We must look at<br />
the likely loadings on early morning trains up<br />
from Brigh<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>to</strong> make sure there is room for<br />
passengers and their luggage, and sufficient<br />
d<strong>we</strong>ll time for passengers <strong>to</strong> <strong>get</strong> everything on<br />
board at Gatwick.<br />
‘We need <strong>to</strong> look at ticketing arrangements<br />
in general and pricing from Gatwick in<br />
particular. We need an internal refurbishment<br />
of the trains and <strong>we</strong> must provide more luggage<br />
space. That’s a lot <strong>to</strong> do in 18 months. But it’s<br />
as good a compromise as <strong>we</strong> can manage<br />
without infrastructure work.’<br />
BAA had consistently argued that dumping<br />
the Gatwick Express was a fla<strong>we</strong>d concept,<br />
taking a sledgehammer <strong>to</strong> crack a problem that<br />
exists for only an hour or two each <strong>we</strong>ekday. Its<br />
original submission <strong>to</strong> the G<strong>over</strong>nment had<br />
quoted from a <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> edi<strong>to</strong>rial of 2004:<br />
‘At a time when other industrialised nations<br />
either have a dedicated rail link <strong>to</strong> their major<br />
airports, or are busy building them, Britain’s rail<br />
authority is planning a <strong>move</strong> in the opposite<br />
direction. Is that progress?’<br />
But with Southern’s passenger numbers on<br />
the route growing by four per cent a year, the<br />
debate was never straightforward. Gatwick<br />
station has long been a bottleneck, with<br />
conflicting train <strong>move</strong>ments. The Gatwick<br />
Expresses have <strong>to</strong> cross the tracks <strong>to</strong> sit at a<br />
platform for up <strong>to</strong> 20 minutes at a stretch. Useful<br />
for airline passengers arriving on ‘red-eye’ flights<br />
with jet lag, heavy luggage and a dodgy sense of<br />
direction. Boarding a through train which s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />
for 90 seconds would not be as easy, particularly<br />
if that train was already full of commuters whose<br />
briefcases and umbrellas already filled the<br />
limited luggage space.<br />
A re-working of the layout at Gatwick could<br />
provide space for trains <strong>to</strong> wait for airport<br />
passengers without messing up the precious<br />
paths <strong>to</strong> Brigh<strong>to</strong>n. Network <strong>Rail</strong>, the<br />
Department for Transport, the train opera<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
and BAA are all talking about it. It’s possible a<br />
solution could emerge in time for the next<br />
Southern franchise in 2009, but they will be<br />
looking for Gatwick Airport <strong>to</strong> pick up a big<br />
chunk of the cost. And with the competition<br />
authorities currently investigating BAA’s<br />
continued ownership of all three main London<br />
airports, and the continuing debate about where<br />
an additional runway might be built,<br />
commitments on that scale will not be rapid.<br />
Chris Burchell calls it a ‘good compromise<br />
solution for the short <strong>to</strong> medium term’. It’s a<br />
description most parties would accept. A stepchange<br />
in capacity on one of the country’s<br />
fastest-growing and most heavily-congested<br />
railway routes requires more than a little<br />
cascaded second-hand rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck. It needs<br />
major infrastructure changes at Gatwick, and a<br />
fly<strong>over</strong> at East Croydon.<br />
Neither has yet been promised.<br />
Paul Clif<strong>to</strong>n is the transport correspondent for<br />
BBC South.<br />
MAY 2007 : RAIL PROFESSIONAL<br />
11