16.11.2014 Views

move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional

move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional

move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NEWS ANALYSIS FEATURE<br />

Justin Grainge<br />

Chris Burchell, manager of Southern which takes <strong>over</strong><br />

Gatwick Express from May 2008.<br />

Brian Cooke, chairman of London<br />

TravelWatch, says he is pleased the lengthy<br />

discussions had finally come <strong>to</strong> a head.<br />

‘Ho<strong>we</strong>ver it is a real shame that this will take <strong>to</strong><br />

the end of next year <strong>to</strong> achieve,’ he adds. ‘A more<br />

strategic approach <strong>to</strong> allocating the rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

might have solved this problem much, much<br />

earlier. The precise benefits for passengers are<br />

still unclear – it will depend on the detail of the<br />

proposed timetable changes.’<br />

But passengers in West Sussex are less<br />

pleased. Trevor Tupper of the Arun Valley <strong>Rail</strong><br />

Users Association says: ‘Three years ago the<br />

Strategic <strong>Rail</strong> Authority put forward proposals<br />

that would have given Gatwick six express trains<br />

an hour rather than four and all of these would<br />

have carried on in<strong>to</strong> Sussex improving journey<br />

times from London <strong>to</strong> places like Worthing,<br />

Littlehamp<strong>to</strong>n, Chichester and Bognor Regis. It<br />

would also have improved journey times and<br />

frequency <strong>to</strong> Gatwick from these <strong>to</strong>wns as <strong>we</strong>ll<br />

as from Portsmouth, Fareham and<br />

Southamp<strong>to</strong>n. All hope of these improvements<br />

has now been dashed.’<br />

‘We’re quite pleased,’ admits Stuart Condie<br />

of BAA, who led the determined behind-thescenes<br />

lobbying campaign <strong>to</strong> the G<strong>over</strong>nment.<br />

BAA’s planning and surface access direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

comments: ‘We have retained the service<br />

elements that our passengers need. It’s still four<br />

times an hour, it’s still non-s<strong>to</strong>p and it’s still with<br />

airport branding. ‘We put a lot of time and effort<br />

in<strong>to</strong> <strong>get</strong>ting our views across. But there is still a<br />

lot of detail <strong>to</strong> be worked out. We must look at<br />

the likely loadings on early morning trains up<br />

from Brigh<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>to</strong> make sure there is room for<br />

passengers and their luggage, and sufficient<br />

d<strong>we</strong>ll time for passengers <strong>to</strong> <strong>get</strong> everything on<br />

board at Gatwick.<br />

‘We need <strong>to</strong> look at ticketing arrangements<br />

in general and pricing from Gatwick in<br />

particular. We need an internal refurbishment<br />

of the trains and <strong>we</strong> must provide more luggage<br />

space. That’s a lot <strong>to</strong> do in 18 months. But it’s<br />

as good a compromise as <strong>we</strong> can manage<br />

without infrastructure work.’<br />

BAA had consistently argued that dumping<br />

the Gatwick Express was a fla<strong>we</strong>d concept,<br />

taking a sledgehammer <strong>to</strong> crack a problem that<br />

exists for only an hour or two each <strong>we</strong>ekday. Its<br />

original submission <strong>to</strong> the G<strong>over</strong>nment had<br />

quoted from a <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> edi<strong>to</strong>rial of 2004:<br />

‘At a time when other industrialised nations<br />

either have a dedicated rail link <strong>to</strong> their major<br />

airports, or are busy building them, Britain’s rail<br />

authority is planning a <strong>move</strong> in the opposite<br />

direction. Is that progress?’<br />

But with Southern’s passenger numbers on<br />

the route growing by four per cent a year, the<br />

debate was never straightforward. Gatwick<br />

station has long been a bottleneck, with<br />

conflicting train <strong>move</strong>ments. The Gatwick<br />

Expresses have <strong>to</strong> cross the tracks <strong>to</strong> sit at a<br />

platform for up <strong>to</strong> 20 minutes at a stretch. Useful<br />

for airline passengers arriving on ‘red-eye’ flights<br />

with jet lag, heavy luggage and a dodgy sense of<br />

direction. Boarding a through train which s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

for 90 seconds would not be as easy, particularly<br />

if that train was already full of commuters whose<br />

briefcases and umbrellas already filled the<br />

limited luggage space.<br />

A re-working of the layout at Gatwick could<br />

provide space for trains <strong>to</strong> wait for airport<br />

passengers without messing up the precious<br />

paths <strong>to</strong> Brigh<strong>to</strong>n. Network <strong>Rail</strong>, the<br />

Department for Transport, the train opera<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

and BAA are all talking about it. It’s possible a<br />

solution could emerge in time for the next<br />

Southern franchise in 2009, but they will be<br />

looking for Gatwick Airport <strong>to</strong> pick up a big<br />

chunk of the cost. And with the competition<br />

authorities currently investigating BAA’s<br />

continued ownership of all three main London<br />

airports, and the continuing debate about where<br />

an additional runway might be built,<br />

commitments on that scale will not be rapid.<br />

Chris Burchell calls it a ‘good compromise<br />

solution for the short <strong>to</strong> medium term’. It’s a<br />

description most parties would accept. A stepchange<br />

in capacity on one of the country’s<br />

fastest-growing and most heavily-congested<br />

railway routes requires more than a little<br />

cascaded second-hand rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck. It needs<br />

major infrastructure changes at Gatwick, and a<br />

fly<strong>over</strong> at East Croydon.<br />

Neither has yet been promised.<br />

Paul Clif<strong>to</strong>n is the transport correspondent for<br />

BBC South.<br />

MAY 2007 : RAIL PROFESSIONAL<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!