move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
move over freightliner, we want to get into ... - Rail Professional
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SMOKING BAN<br />
Bob Crowley, head of employee relations at Midland Mainline, encourages staff <strong>to</strong> take<br />
advantage of healthcare opportunities that help <strong>to</strong> promote the smoking ban.<br />
only requires that enclosed areas are smoke-free,<br />
meaning that open-air platforms technically aren’t<br />
c<strong>over</strong>ed.<br />
But according <strong>to</strong> Network <strong>Rail</strong>, the problem<br />
has been solved by using certain railway byelaws.<br />
The company’s commercial manager, Andrew<br />
Hut<strong>to</strong>n, says: ‘As I understand it, any company<br />
can set its own rules, but <strong>we</strong> clearly have the<br />
benefit of having railway byelaws in place and<br />
<strong>we</strong>’re able <strong>to</strong> adjust them as <strong>we</strong> wish <strong>to</strong> within<br />
reason.’ It’s enabled Network <strong>Rail</strong> and the train<br />
opera<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> declare that all ‘station premises’ will<br />
be smoke-free. Smoking will still be allo<strong>we</strong>d in<br />
station forecourts and car parks that don’t have<br />
a roof.<br />
Special posters will be going up soon <strong>to</strong> inform<br />
passengers about the changes and no-smoking<br />
signage will also be used when the law actually<br />
comes in. According <strong>to</strong> Hut<strong>to</strong>n, working out the<br />
wording of the signs hasn’t been easy, because of<br />
the fact that the smoking ban on the railways will<br />
be g<strong>over</strong>ned by the two different sets of rules.<br />
He says: ‘We have an issue in making sure that<br />
the wording that is relative <strong>to</strong> the railway byelaws<br />
is correct where it needs <strong>to</strong> be. And where the<br />
wording relates <strong>to</strong> the legal part, it needs <strong>to</strong> be<br />
correct <strong>to</strong> reflect that.’ Both Network <strong>Rail</strong> and the<br />
Tocs are promising a comprehensive signage on<br />
all stations. A<strong>to</strong>c’s John Dennis says: ‘There will<br />
be notices put up because that’s part of the<br />
legislative requirement. They will gradually appear<br />
throughout June. All Tocs will be responsible for<br />
ensuring that it happens.’<br />
One company, Midland Mainline, decided not<br />
<strong>to</strong> wait until July. It <strong>to</strong>ok the lead<br />
and imposed a ban on all its<br />
managed properties, including<br />
stations, in January. Managing<br />
direc<strong>to</strong>r, Garry Raven says: ‘We’ve<br />
gone early <strong>to</strong> allow staff and passengers a period<br />
of time <strong>to</strong> <strong>get</strong> used <strong>to</strong> it. We’d already banned<br />
smoking on trains several years ago and it was<br />
generally <strong>we</strong>ll received.’<br />
Midland Mainline has also had <strong>to</strong> consider its<br />
workforce. The changes have meant kitchens and<br />
redundant rooms, where previously smoking was<br />
<strong>to</strong>lerated, are all out of bounds <strong>to</strong> smokers. Signs<br />
outlining the changes have gone up in all<br />
company offices. Raven says: ‘We have tried <strong>to</strong> be<br />
sympathetic in the way <strong>we</strong> do it. We’ve tried <strong>to</strong> give<br />
everyone some sort of fair <strong>we</strong>ather shelter if they<br />
wish <strong>to</strong> carry on smoking. But <strong>we</strong>’ve also done<br />
Well Being days.’ The special sessions arranged<br />
by the company have been <strong>we</strong>ll attended. Midland<br />
Mainline has also agreed <strong>to</strong> provide free nicotine<br />
patches for those who <strong>want</strong> <strong>to</strong> give up. Around 30<br />
members of staff have signed up, including MD<br />
himself. ‘I was just taking advantage of a window<br />
of opportunity I suppose. I have been smoking<br />
for 40 years and have given up a couple times in<br />
the past and have failed miserably. I just thought<br />
that this would be an opportunity for me.’<br />
Enforcement of the new laws appears <strong>to</strong> be<br />
something of a grey area. Ultimately the British<br />
Transport Police will be responsible. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, with<br />
large parts of the rail system already non-smoking,<br />
a force spokesman pointed out that it’s largely<br />
enforced through self-policing and by rail staff,<br />
adding: ‘If a police officer comes across someone<br />
smoking where they shouldn’t, they would enforce<br />
it as <strong>we</strong>ll.’ The BTP maintains that the extension<br />
of no-smoking areas that the new legislation is<br />
bringing in isn't expected <strong>to</strong> cause any major<br />
problems. The spokesman says the ban in<br />
Scotland has not caused any problems and, so far,<br />
the Welsh experience has been the same.<br />
According <strong>to</strong> Network <strong>Rail</strong>, peer pressure and<br />
disapproval from other non-smoking passengers<br />
are probably all that is needed <strong>to</strong> deal with most<br />
of those who flout the law. Nevertheless, staff<br />
working on the railways are being given definitive<br />
advice and guidance about how <strong>to</strong> deal with such<br />
incidents. Network <strong>Rail</strong>’s Andrew Hut<strong>to</strong>n says:<br />
“At what point, and how do you<br />
professionally, but firmly, make<br />
sure that the new rules are taken<br />
note of? We don’t <strong>want</strong> the police<br />
<strong>get</strong>ting involved every time<br />
somebody lights up a cigarette, but<br />
on the other hand <strong>we</strong> can’t allow it<br />
<strong>to</strong> be flouted.’<br />
For railway managers there are<br />
other issues that need <strong>to</strong> be dealt<br />
with ahead of July. The ban on<br />
smoking in the workplace will also<br />
c<strong>over</strong> company vehicles. Network<br />
<strong>Rail</strong> has thousands of them. Hut<strong>to</strong>n<br />
says: ‘The issue of company vehicles<br />
is quite a big one. Basically as soon as<br />
you’re in a company vehicle that could be shared,<br />
then it’s no smoking area.’<br />
While the smoking ban may be something of<br />
a minefield for railway managers <strong>to</strong> interpret and<br />
enforce, it will obviously provide a much more<br />
pleasant environment for both passengers and<br />
staff who don’t smoke. The G<strong>over</strong>nment’s hoping<br />
that those who do might decide that the changes<br />
provide an ideal opportunity <strong>to</strong> give up smoking.<br />
Many companies have, quite rightly, been drawing<br />
on experience from Scotland where a smoking<br />
ban appears <strong>to</strong> have been accepted and more<br />
importunately hasn’t been widely abused. But<br />
ultimately railway managers in England are<br />
responsible for ensuring that the new laws are<br />
observed.<br />
Those in charge of the premises could face a<br />
£2,500 fine if they fail <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p people flouting the<br />
law. They could also be charged on-the-spot fines<br />
of £200 if they fail <strong>to</strong> display adequate nosmoking<br />
signs, with the penalty increasing <strong>to</strong><br />
£1,000 if the issue goes <strong>to</strong> court.<br />
There has been much debate about whether a<br />
ban should be imposed, but so far where it has<br />
happen the signs are very positive. Let’s hope the<br />
same happens here in July.<br />
Peter Plisner is the BBC’s Midlands transport<br />
correspondent.<br />
MAY 2007 : RAIL PROFESSIONAL<br />
21