21.11.2014 Views

Touch Screens: A Pressing Technology

Touch Screens: A Pressing Technology

Touch Screens: A Pressing Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1118 B9<br />

Apple<br />

Apple Corporation is a pioneer in the field of consumer<br />

electronics. With their innovative designs, Apple products<br />

have been setting new standards to which other technology<br />

is compared. In 2007, Apple revealed the iPhone, changing<br />

the face of telecommunications and touch screen technology<br />

[10]. This device was revolutionary because it incorporated a<br />

cell phone, iPod, and Internet communications device,<br />

making it the only electronic device you need [11]. Apple<br />

also created a version of this device to be the next generation<br />

of iPod, called the iPod <strong>Touch</strong> or the i<strong>Touch</strong>. It is very<br />

similar to the iPhone, except for the difference that it does<br />

not have cell phone capabilities. For our purposes, these<br />

devices will be described as interchangeable, because they<br />

both rely on the same touch technology and the same userinterface<br />

[9].<br />

manipulate documents, images, and other files with motions<br />

that feel like the task actually being completed, the user is<br />

able to work more efficiently and with less specific training<br />

or knowledge.<br />

Apple recently announced their next step in the field of<br />

touch screen technology: the iPad. Little is known about this<br />

device, aside from general technical descriptions of what it<br />

can do, and its 9.7-inch multi-touch display [9]. It can be<br />

assumed that it operates very similarly to that of the iPhone<br />

and iPod touch. This device was designed to browse the<br />

web, read and send email, view photos, movies, listen to<br />

music, play games, and read e-books, among many other<br />

things [13]. With these tasks in mind, the iPad is creating a<br />

new market for touch screen devices, much as the iPhone<br />

changed the mobile phone industry. By integrating<br />

innovative hardware, and creating arguably the most<br />

intuitive user interface available, Apple continues to raise<br />

the bar for all of their competitors in the consumer touch<br />

screen industry.<br />

PROS AND CONS<br />

FIGURE 5<br />

APPLE IPHONE [9]<br />

The iPhone and i<strong>Touch</strong> both use a projected capacitive<br />

touch screen, and are often used as examples in comparing<br />

projected capacitive technology to other touch screen<br />

technologies [10]. The patent application for this system is<br />

where most of our knowledge of the screen is from. It<br />

describes two different types of touch technology, selfcapacitance<br />

and mutual capacitance [12]. Self-capacitance is<br />

“a simple passive array of 2436 sensing electrodes in a<br />

single plane” [12]. Mutual capacitance, on the other hand,<br />

works much more like other capacitive touch screens. By<br />

setting two layers on top of each other, aligning the<br />

measuring strips perpendicular to each other, and calculating<br />

the touch point based on the X and Y coordinate of the<br />

touch, greater accuracy is achieved [10]. Another<br />

technologically relevant aspect of the iPhone is its use of<br />

multi-touch input, which allows for 15 touches at a time<br />

[12]. It is with this technology that the iPhone and iPod<br />

touch revolutionized the touch screen industry.<br />

These devices are important to the development of<br />

touch screen technology, because of their superior user<br />

interface (UI). There are six main functions of the iPhone’s<br />

touch screen: “Single tap to select or activate something,<br />

double tap to change the display format, drag and drop to<br />

move something, a stroke (“swipe” or “flick”)<br />

up/down/left/right to scroll, “pinching” two fingers together<br />

to shrink something,” and “spreading” two fingers apart to<br />

enlarge something” [10]. These intuitive controls have set a<br />

new precedent for all user interfaces. By being able to<br />

The two types of infrared systems are internal reflection and<br />

infrared grid. Infrared grids systems are reliable and can be<br />

manufactured inexpensively into appropriate sizes. Due to<br />

the grid of lasers and sensors, users do not need to press<br />

fully down on the screen putting less wear on screen<br />

increasing the life expectancy of the unit. The grid also<br />

increases the precision of the users touch.<br />

Internal reflection systems are large systems because<br />

of the space required for cameras to accurately measure the<br />

shadow produced by the infrared LEDs. The large space<br />

required for larger instruments does make internal reflection<br />

devices the most accurate touch screen technology. Units<br />

like the Microsoft Surface, the leading internal reflection<br />

device, are also able to increase their multi-touch capabilities<br />

to 300 plus touches.<br />

Resistive touch screen technology is the cheapest of<br />

the different types of touch screens; however, there are a few<br />

drawbacks. The first problem with this technology is the<br />

flexibility of the top layer of screen. This causes the ITO<br />

coating to crack due to the continual stretching and<br />

retracting of the flexible later [3]. This wear also relates to<br />

the air gap between the ITO layers. This gap allows dirt and<br />

dust to collect between the two conductive surfaces, making<br />

the display appear dirty. Additionally, these devices are “less<br />

than ideal for harsh environments,” due to the fact that they<br />

are vulnerable to temperature and humidity changes, which<br />

would affect the accuracy of the touch screen [3]. This is not<br />

to say that they do not perform consistently under standard<br />

conditions. One benefit of this technology is that the user is<br />

able to use his or her finger or a stylus as input devices [3].<br />

Overall, resistive touch screens perform very well,<br />

considering that they are the cheapest of the different touch<br />

screens.<br />

University of Pittsburgh April 10, 2010<br />

TENTH ANNUAL FRESHMAN CONFERENCE<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!