24.11.2014 Views

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CP16<br />

CP21<br />

Development Plan Policies<br />

DP1<br />

DP25<br />

DP30<br />

DP44<br />

115. Consideration of the Core Strategy Policies<br />

116. The Core Strategy defines the Strategic Vision and Policies for <strong>Hambleton</strong><br />

and includes a Spatial Strategy for the <strong>District</strong> and Strategic Spatial Policies. The<br />

Core Strategy aims to achieve sustainable development by use of a settlement<br />

hierarchy. <strong>Bagby</strong> is not identified within the settlement hierarchy (Policy CP4)<br />

which means that it is not considered to be a suitable location for additional<br />

housing or employment development other than in the instances of development<br />

that is an exceptional case under the terms of Policy CP1 and CP2 and is one of<br />

the six circumstances identified in Policy CP4. This is the ‘exceptional case test’.<br />

117. Exceptional Case Test - Policies CP1, CP2, CP4<br />

118. Policy CP4 recognises that there must be exceptions to this principle of<br />

excluding new development from the countryside, for example where there is an<br />

essential requirement to locate in the countryside. Essentially the purpose of<br />

CP4 is to exercise strong restraint on development in locations outside the<br />

sustainable settlement hierarchy (second paragraph of CP4). Restraint is applied<br />

through three tests, all of which must be met to justify development.<br />

119. Test One: “Exceptional Case” in terms of CP1 and CP2. Making an<br />

“exceptional case” does not mean showing how a proposal meets the criteria and<br />

provision of CP1 and CP2. The Plan states that the benefits sought by CP1 and<br />

CP2 are more likely to be achieved by locating development within the<br />

sustainable settlement hierarchy (Core Strategy paragraph 4.1.9). The<br />

assumption is that development in locations outside the sustainable settlement<br />

hierarchy would likely to be contrary to CP1 and CP2. “Exceptional Case”<br />

<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 33 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!