Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(1) Without planning permission the unauthorised operational development<br />
comprising the construction of the aircraft hanger as shown edged blue and<br />
identified as hanger E on the attached plan.<br />
(2) Without planning permission the unauthorised operational development<br />
comprising the concreting of the apron to aircraft hanger E as shown edged<br />
green on the attached plan.<br />
(3) Without planning permission the unauthorised operational development<br />
comprising the concreting of the apron to the aircraft hanger marked A as shown<br />
edged pink on the attached plan.<br />
(4) Without planning permission the unauthorised operational development<br />
comprising the concreting of part of the main east west runway as shown edged<br />
yellow on the attached plan<br />
(5) Without planning permission the unauthorised engineering<br />
works/operational development comprising the installation of plastic geo-textile<br />
matting on the main east west runway as shown edged orange on the attached<br />
plan.<br />
311. The appeal was made on Grounds A, C, F and G. The appeal under<br />
Ground A for items (3) and (5) failed as the period for payment of the fee lapsed.<br />
Whilst a further application was made in respect of the matters alleged in the<br />
Enforcement Notice the Ground A appeal can not be revived.<br />
312. The Ground A appeal<br />
313. The Ground A appeal seeking the grant of planning permission in respect of<br />
all 5 breaches raises all the same issues for both the appellant and the Local<br />
Planning Authority as the appeal against the refusal of planning permission for<br />
the two 2009 applications and the 2010 application. The reason for the issue of<br />
the Enforcement Notice relates to the same issues as set out planning decision<br />
regarding a loss of amenity to local residents. No additional evidence is<br />
considered necessary beyond that set out in the earlier part of this Proof of<br />
Evidence.<br />
314. The Ground C appeal<br />
315. Section 57 (1) of the Planning Act requires planning permission for<br />
development. Section 55 defines “development” including at Section 55 (1)<br />
“development” means the carrying out of building, engineering, mining or other<br />
operations in, on, over or under land, or the making of any material change in the<br />
use of any buildings or other land<br />
<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 68 -