24.11.2014 Views

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316. As set out in the Enforcement Notice the installation of the matting is an<br />

engineering operation.<br />

317. The appellant states that “In this respect, it is considered that the geo-textile<br />

matting is not development and therefore does not require planning permission,<br />

since it does not constitute an engineering operation”.<br />

318. The provision of matting to the east west runway involves the installation of<br />

an engineered product, a product that has been designed to be installed under<br />

the supervision of a suitably experienced engineer and with reference to the<br />

manufacturers’ specification.<br />

319. It is an engineering operation to install the matting involving engineering<br />

plant and equipment again with adherence to the manufacturers’ specification of<br />

installation, being an operation normally undertaken as a building activity or<br />

engineering operation depending on the scale of installation. In this case the<br />

installation is over a large area and was installed as an engineering operation.<br />

The installation of the matting is therefore development and is development<br />

which is not permitted by any General or Special Development Order.<br />

320. It is my understanding that the installation of the special reinforcement<br />

matting took place over the course of several days and that the work involved the<br />

use of specialist vibration rolling equipment as used in road building and other<br />

engineering works. To the best of my knowledge no other additional preparatory<br />

work was required before the matting was installed.<br />

321. The Ground F appeal<br />

322. The Notice requires the removal of the concrete from the main east west<br />

runway. The requirements of the notice do not specify the material to be used to<br />

reinstate the runway. It is understood that the ground was previously made up of<br />

hardcore overlaid with soil and a 4” deep heavy duty plastic reinforcement<br />

matting similar to the type installed to the east and west of the concrete.<br />

323. The notice does not require the re-instatement to a grass finish without the<br />

underlying hardcore or reinforcement matting.<br />

<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 69 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!