24.11.2014 Views

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

junction of the A19 and <strong>Bagby</strong> Lane to the position of Griffin Farm with only minor<br />

interruption due to a tall hedgerow. At 80 k/mph the hangars, club house and<br />

windsock around the airfield are visible for about 14 seconds to a<br />

motorist/passenger on the A19 in both southbound and northbound directions.<br />

The same claim of limited views from the A19 is made at paragraph 6.23 where<br />

the report makes reference to the impact of the new project.<br />

282. The FPCR report claims at paragraph 4.35 (page 27) that, “There are no<br />

negative impact upon the wider landscape character beyond its immediate<br />

context which is currently degraded by its utilitarian ramshackle structures and<br />

setting.” This statement avoids reference to the intrusion caused by the<br />

demolition debris that has accumulated at the south western end of the runway or<br />

the attention drawn to the site by the recently installed windsock. The existing<br />

buildings on the airfield are noticeable from positions that are up to a kilometre<br />

from the site. The existing buildings could not be described as enhancing the<br />

landscape, nor is the impact of the buildings neutral in the landscape.<br />

Accordingly it is considered that the impact of the existing buildings on the airfield<br />

is more significant than that claimed in the FPCR report and is clearly adverse. I<br />

consider that the existing buildings cause a slight adverse impact on the wider<br />

landscape and that the movement of the windsock and aircraft draw attention to<br />

the airfield such that the slight adverse impact is experienced by a greater<br />

number of people than would be the case of a similar group of agricultural<br />

buildings.<br />

c. the magnitude of impact caused by the design<br />

283. Section 6 of the FPCR sets out to assess the impacts of the project. The<br />

report appears to assess both the impact of the new landscaping work ten years<br />

after planting in combination with the impact of the building work. However the<br />

report concentrates on assessing the impacts on the landscape of the new<br />

planting works and makes little reference to the impacts arising from the<br />

additional building works.<br />

284. The new range of hangars on the south eastern boundary of the airfield<br />

would stand as a significant and solid barrier in the landscape. The grouping of<br />

buildings would not be of an agricultural character and would when viewed in<br />

<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 63 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!