Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
125. Test Two: is more straightforward, it means being able to meet at least one<br />
of the criteria i) to vi) in CP4 and provide the evidence to prove this. This is<br />
additional to the policy test to demonstrate an exceptional case.<br />
126. There are two potential criteria in CP4 against which the scheme can be<br />
considered. These are criteria (i) and (vi);<br />
• the scheme fails the tests of criteria (i) because the development is not<br />
necessary to meet the needs of the industries listed in the policy and the<br />
scheme has not demonstrated how (if at all) it will help to support a<br />
sustainable rural economy.<br />
• in respect of criteria (vi) the scheme fails because there is no requirement<br />
for social and economic regeneration in this area. Further, no evidence<br />
has been supplied as to how it will support such regeneration. The extent<br />
and quality of such evidence must mean something more than modest<br />
increase in employment and expenditure in the local economy or else the<br />
policy would not act as a meaningful constraint on development in this<br />
area. It is a policy allowing exceptions and there is nothing exceptional<br />
about this development.<br />
127. In light of the above considerations, Test Two fails.<br />
128. Test Three: requires proposals not to conflict with the environmental<br />
protection and nature conservation policies of the LDF (final paragraph of CP4).<br />
129. Subject to appropriate mitigation and enhancement measures, the<br />
proposed development will not have a detrimental impact on ecology. The<br />
proposals will inevitably have an undesirable impact on the character and<br />
appearance of open countryside as explained in the landscape section of this<br />
proof. Noise is an environmental impact, the scheme causes noise and harm to<br />
the environment most notably the living conditions of the local population.<br />
130. In light of the above considerations, Test Three fails. Accordingly, the<br />
development fails to comply with policies CP1, CP2 and CP4.<br />
131. CP15 is a permissive policy supporting rural regeneration. It identifies a<br />
range of opportunities to support the economy of rural communities. The policy<br />
<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 35 -