24.11.2014 Views

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

Mr M Scott, Bagby Airfield, Bagby, Thirsk, North - Hambleton District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

223. The details set out by the appellant in their application for planning approval<br />

for the 2010 scheme stated that the existing use of the site was for “airfield,<br />

aircraft parking, storage, repair, maintenance, refuelling, aircraft hire, flying<br />

lessons, training, clubhouse with bar and dining facilities.” The use of the site for<br />

aircraft hire, flying lessons, training have not been established as lawful uses.<br />

The uses are however uses that may be anticipated to operate from any airfield<br />

and the matter of whether they require planning permission is therefore a matter<br />

of fact and degree. No evidence has become available to the Council to<br />

demonstrate that on the balance of probability that the level of use for aircraft<br />

hire, provision of flying lessons or training have reached a level that requires<br />

planning permission for a change of use.<br />

224. Change of use frequently is a gradual process, involving fluctuations in<br />

intensity and shifts in precise location. Pinpointing the date of a breach of<br />

planning control is often, therefore, difficult. In such cases, the only effective test<br />

is to compare the present use with the previous use, or (as in this case) the use<br />

in the base year (ten years prior to the date of the application) and assess<br />

whether there has been any material change in use. This test was expressly<br />

endorsed in Thurrock BC v. SoSE [2001] EWHC Admin 128<br />

225. The lawful use of <strong>Bagby</strong> <strong>Airfield</strong> is as an airfield subject to the limitations of<br />

the physical extent, condition and facilities at the airfield and those uses and<br />

activities that have existed throughout the last 10 years.<br />

226. The physical limitations include the size of the runway, its width and length,<br />

gradient, drainage and surfacing, all of these have been noted to have changed<br />

overtime, with particular importance are the additional matting on the runway and<br />

provision of hangar. These are in breach of planning control and subject to the<br />

2009 Enforcement Notice. The nature of the use has changed as a consequence<br />

of the physical changes. The use of hangars for storage of aircraft and for<br />

maintenance has the potential to change the character of the use.<br />

227. The lawful use of the airfield is not as it is seen today.<br />

228. Some important changes occurred in 2007 with the laying of matting and<br />

provision of concrete section to runway and apron. Construction of additional<br />

<strong>Hambleton</strong> <strong>District</strong> Council - Tim Wood – Proof of Evidence - 51 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!