25.11.2014 Views

Fire Department Attrition Reduction Plan Update - City of Columbia

Fire Department Attrition Reduction Plan Update - City of Columbia

Fire Department Attrition Reduction Plan Update - City of Columbia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Columbia</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Department</strong><br />

Employee <strong>Attrition</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>


<strong>Columbia</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Department</strong> must<br />

establish a competitive marketplace<br />

necessary to retain a fully experienced<br />

and capable fire employee whose<br />

performance consistently meets or<br />

exceeds the <strong>City</strong>'s expectations.<br />

Reasonably Acceptable <strong>Attrition</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Nationally recognized for its survey research services, the Institute monitors<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> life in South Carolina by providing information to policy<br />

makers, the media, and the public. The Institute has the capacity to conduct<br />

all phases <strong>of</strong> survey research, including identification <strong>of</strong> the most appropriate<br />

method for gathering information, questionnaire design, sample selection,<br />

data collection and processing, and analysis. It conducts face-to-face,<br />

telephone, mail, and Internet surveys, as well as mixed-mode applications.<br />

Government managers and administrators frequently call the Institute to<br />

conduct independent analyses on a wide range <strong>of</strong> public policy and<br />

operational issues. Recent studies include analyses <strong>of</strong> procurement policies,<br />

organizational structure, business license ordinances, and department staffing<br />

and compensation levels. The Institute also has experience in process<br />

mapping and redesign, conducting training needs analyses, developing<br />

performance appraisal systems, and reviewing user fees and cost allocation.<br />

USC’s Institute for Public Safety and Policy Research<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


USC’s Comprehensive Study was conducted in 3 phases.<br />

• Phase One: Previous Employee Survey Report<br />

• Phase Two: Current Employee Survey Report<br />

• Phase Three: Consisted <strong>of</strong> Human Resources Practices<br />

USC’s Institute for Public Safety and Policy Research<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Phase One and Phase Two:<br />

A previous Employee Survey Report was conducted to<br />

identify reasons former employees resigned or retired, and<br />

to gather data on both current and previous employee’s<br />

beliefs and attitudes about the <strong>Columbia</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

Concurrently, active employees were confidentially<br />

surveyed in regards to factors related to turnover and<br />

retention including compensation, training, job satisfaction,<br />

and management practices.<br />

USC’s Institute for Public Safety and Policy Research<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• Employee Satisfaction Issues<br />

• Deficient Competitive Market Rate Compensation across all<br />

fire ranks<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> Comparable Annual FLSA working hours<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> incentives for required specialized training<br />

• High-performing employees not rewarded<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> retention / longevity incentives<br />

Issues Affecting <strong>Attrition</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• 44% <strong>of</strong> former CFD employees would not<br />

recommend CFD as good place to work<br />

• Nearly 1/3 <strong>of</strong> all current CFD employees are<br />

dissatisfied with job<br />

• Comparatively 85% <strong>of</strong> employees in surveyed<br />

departments would recommend their department as<br />

a good place to work<br />

Employee Survey Report<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• Communication<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> guidelines<br />

• Officer development<br />

• Employee recognition<br />

• Respect from command staff and managers<br />

• Command staff must admit mistakes<br />

• Seek employee input on new ideas and improvements<br />

• Improved use <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

Improving Employee Satisfaction<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Phase Three <strong>of</strong> the study surveyed Human<br />

Resources Practices for 21 metropolitan fire<br />

departments in the southeastern US<br />

9 departments responded consisting <strong>of</strong> 115 to 820<br />

employees, with an average size <strong>of</strong> 415<br />

5 departments <strong>of</strong>fered paramedic service and 2<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered EMT services; 2 <strong>of</strong>fered no medical<br />

services<br />

USC’s Institute for Public Safety and Policy Research<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• Lowest Salaried Respondent reported 20% <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate<br />

• Second Lowest Salaried Respondents reported 8% <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate<br />

• Upper-half Salaried Respondents reported less than 3% <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate<br />

• CFD 2011 <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate 13.29% (55 /414)<br />

• 89% <strong>of</strong> CFD personnel dissatisfied with pay<br />

• Many 6-month to 1-year firefighters now earning more than 4 year<br />

employees due to lack <strong>of</strong> adjustments<br />

• There are firefighters currently qualified for and receiving<br />

food stamps<br />

Respondent <strong>Attrition</strong> Comparison<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• CFD 6 Year Average <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate is currently 9.3%<br />

• CFD has lost a total <strong>of</strong> 251 personnel between 2006-2012*<br />

• 90 personnel since January 2011 alone<br />

• CFD has replaced 60% <strong>of</strong> department since 2006.<br />

• CFD average salaries rank below all respondents' reported<br />

minimum salaries<br />

• 2012* attrition rate is 8.45% (35 / 414)<br />

• 185 personnel have less than 5 years <strong>of</strong> service currently<br />

earning entry level pay.<br />

CFD <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate 2006-2012<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Annual Compensation<br />

$70,000<br />

$60,000<br />

$50,000<br />

$40,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$20,000<br />

$10,000<br />

$-<br />

<strong>Fire</strong><br />

Battalion Division<br />

Engineer Captain<br />

Fighter<br />

Chief Chief<br />

CFD Starting $28,919 $32,001 $42,790 $47,414 $50,497<br />

Market Rate $37,554 $39,291 $52,876 $64,793 $65,486<br />

% Difference -29.86% -41% -23.57% -36.65% -29.68%<br />

Market Rate Starting Salary Disparity<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Annual Compensation<br />

$90,000<br />

$80,000<br />

$70,000<br />

$60,000<br />

$50,000<br />

$40,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$20,000<br />

$10,000<br />

$-<br />

<strong>Fire</strong><br />

Fighter<br />

<strong>Fire</strong><br />

Engineer<br />

<strong>Fire</strong><br />

Captain<br />

Battalion<br />

Chief<br />

Division<br />

Chief<br />

COC Median $30,641 $38,813 $47,714 $57,691 $68,015<br />

COC Avg $31,316 $41,285 $48,725 $58,661 $67,322<br />

Study Avg. $46,845 $58,053 $65,895 $81,777 $81,040<br />

Market Rate Actual Salary Disparity<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Surveyed <strong>City</strong> USC CREC*<br />

• Nashville 5.0% 5.1% lower than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

• Tampa<br />

3.5% 2.4% lower than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

• Rock Hill 3.2% ------ lower than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

• Charlotte 2.1% 0.6% lower than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

• Raleigh 1.4% 2.9% lower than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

• Orlando<br />

• Charleston<br />

• Gainesville<br />

2.8% 3.1% higher than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

4.4% 4.4% higher than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

5.4% 4.6% higher than <strong>Columbia</strong><br />

Cost-<strong>of</strong>-Living Index Comparisons<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief<br />

*Center for Regional Economic Competitiveness


• $1.89 million spent in 2012 for latest 44 newly hired<br />

firefighters for their first full year <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

• Pre-Employment Testing, Recruit Training, Benefits,<br />

Equipment, and Salary<br />

• $990,000 spent in 2011 for recruit training<br />

• $630,000 spent in 2012 for recruit training<br />

• Currently 42 fire suppression positions open<br />

• Projected costs are $756,000 to train and equip them<br />

First Year Investment Cost <strong>of</strong> New Personnel<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Recruits<br />

Separations<br />

Net Loss<br />

/Gain<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

-20<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Employee Net Loss/Gain<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


•A/C <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Services was advised that possibly 15<br />

CFD firefighters have applied for Lexington County <strong>Fire</strong><br />

Service openings<br />

• It would cost upwards <strong>of</strong> $270,000 to replace these 15<br />

firefighters<br />

• Cost does not include required specialized training,<br />

promotional costs, hiring costs or training requirements<br />

• Current CFD <strong>Fire</strong> Engineers can leave and earn a<br />

higher starting salary as a firefighter at LCFS; two<br />

ranks below their current position.<br />

True Cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>Attrition</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• $3.33 Million spent on new hires over last 5 years<br />

• CFD’s 5 year average attrition rate <strong>of</strong> 9.3%<br />

cost $666,000 per year to replace<br />

• Attaining a 3% Target Annual <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate <strong>of</strong> 12<br />

employees would have a projected cost <strong>of</strong> $192,000<br />

• 71% annual reduction <strong>of</strong> new employee training costs<br />

• 2002 attrition rate was 2.6% w/ only 10 departures<br />

3% Target <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate Savings<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


$1,200,000.00<br />

2006-2012* <strong>Attrition</strong> Cost<br />

$1,000,000.00<br />

$800,000.00<br />

$600,000.00<br />

$400,000.00<br />

$200,000.00<br />

$-<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012* 3%<br />

Target<br />

3% <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate Savings<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Attaining a 3% attrition rate will result in immediate new<br />

hire cost reductions<br />

•$798,000 reduction in recruit costs from 2011<br />

•$438,000 reduction in recruit costs from 2012<br />

•$2.37 Million reduction in recruit costs for next 5 years<br />

for attaining 3% attrition rate, replacing 12 per year<br />

We must protect our most valuable resource by<br />

investing in and retaining experienced personnel<br />

Target <strong>Attrition</strong> Rate Savings<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Salary ranges have an established minimum, mid-point, and<br />

maximum salary.<br />

•Minimum salary <strong>of</strong> the a salary range represents the minimum<br />

salary that an organization pays for an individual whose<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> related prior education, training and experience<br />

meets the minimum qualification requirements as specified in the<br />

<strong>City</strong>’s approved job description.<br />

•Mid-Point salary <strong>of</strong> a salary range represents a marketplace<br />

competitive salary necessary to retain a fully experienced and<br />

capable employee whose performance is consistently meeting the<br />

<strong>City</strong>'s expectations.*<br />

•Maximum salary <strong>of</strong> the salary range represents the maximum<br />

salary that the position is valued to the <strong>City</strong>.<br />

ESTABLISHED SALARY RANGES<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief<br />

*<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong> Personnel Policy Manual, Pg.1


90% <strong>of</strong> CFD <strong>Fire</strong> Employees agreed that high<br />

performance was NOT recognized or rewarded<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> Performance Compensation:<br />

• Education / Degrees<br />

• Second Language<br />

• Rescue / Hazmat Support<br />

• Specialized Technical Rescue/ Hazmat Specialist<br />

• Advanced <strong>Fire</strong> Marshal Certifications<br />

• Emergency Medical Technician<br />

Qualified Certification Performance<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Hourly rates<br />

• <strong>Fire</strong> Flow technician earns $13.16/hr<br />

• Minimal on the job training for productive performance<br />

• This position works 80 hrs/pay period<br />

• This position works 2080 hrs/year<br />

• Administration assistant earns $13.42/hr<br />

• Minimal on the job training for productive performance<br />

• This position works 80 hrs/pay period<br />

• This position works 2080 hrs/year<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong> Hourly Wage Comparison<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Certified police <strong>of</strong>ficer earns $14.24 / hr<br />

• 15 weeks <strong>of</strong> training before being able to work<br />

independently<br />

• Police <strong>of</strong>ficers work 85 hours / pay period<br />

• Police <strong>of</strong>ficers work 2184 hrs / year<br />

•Certified firefighter earns $10.50 / hr<br />

• 16 weeks <strong>of</strong> training before being able to work<br />

independently<br />

• Pay calculated on FLSA 106 hour bi-weekly schedule<br />

• FLSA <strong>of</strong> 2756 annual hours calculated<br />

• <strong>Fire</strong>fighters are actually scheduled to work 2920 hours per<br />

year. (365 Days x 24 hours ÷ 3 = 2920)<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong> Hourly Wage Comparison<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• In 2008, The Public Safety Retention <strong>Plan</strong> consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

a 10% market adjustment was initiated as unanimously<br />

approved by <strong>City</strong> Council to be implemented over 3<br />

years for the Retention and Recruitment <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety Personnel<br />

• Only the first phase <strong>of</strong> 3.37% was given<br />

• An independent fire department compensation study in<br />

2007 showed an 18% market rate disparity in which<br />

the council approved adjustments were based<br />

2008 Public Safety Recruitment<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief<br />

and Retention <strong>Plan</strong>


• Employees scheduled to work 8 hours per day/5 days per week<br />

or 2080 hours during the calendar year, will receive holiday<br />

leave hours at the rate <strong>of</strong> 8 hours per holiday.<br />

• 100% scheduled Shift hours received per holiday<br />

• Police Employees scheduled to work 12-hour shifts, or 2210<br />

hours during the calendar year, will receive holiday leave<br />

hours at the rate <strong>of</strong> 8.5 hours per holiday.<br />

• 71% scheduled Shift hours received per holiday<br />

• <strong>Fire</strong> Employees scheduled to work 24-hour shifts, or 2756<br />

hours during the calendar year, will receive holiday leave<br />

hours at the rate <strong>of</strong> 12.0 hours per holiday.<br />

• 50% scheduled Shift hours received per holiday<br />

Public Safety Benefit Parity<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


100%<br />

75%<br />

50%<br />

25%<br />

8 HOUR<br />

POLICE<br />

FIRE<br />

0%<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Holiday Hours Recevied<br />

Public Safety Benefit Parity<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Surveyed departments reported:<br />

• Annual work hours between 2,374 to 2,920<br />

• Average Annual hours worked <strong>of</strong> 2,620 per year<br />

• Annual Leave Range <strong>of</strong> 360 to 522 hours<br />

• Average annual leave <strong>of</strong> 425 hours<br />

• Average <strong>of</strong> 1 to 2 “Kelly Days” per month.<br />

• Kelly Days reduce FLSA hours actually worked<br />

Respondent Annual Hours Worked<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

CFD Annual<br />

Hours<br />

Respondent<br />

Hours<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Min-Leave Mid-Range Max-Leave<br />

Comparative Permissive Leave Hours<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


24 Hour <strong>Fire</strong> Shift employees work 2,920 hours per year<br />

• 120 Holiday Hours<br />

• 111 Hours Annual 1-5 Years = 231 total hours <strong>of</strong> leave<br />

• 169 Hours Annual 10 Years = 289 total hours <strong>of</strong> leave<br />

• 282 Hours Annual 19+ Years = 402 total hours <strong>of</strong> leave<br />

• 10 Year <strong>Fire</strong> Employees receive 32% less permissive<br />

leave than that <strong>of</strong> the respondent average<br />

• 20 Year <strong>Fire</strong> Employees receive 23 hours less total<br />

permissive than the respondent average<br />

CFD’s Comparable Total Permissive Leave<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


PAY CLASS<br />

CALENDAR<br />

FYI ONLY<br />

DEFAULT<br />

PATCHED<br />

HRS (Set in<br />

IFAS)<br />

(HREMEN)<br />

SCHEDULED<br />

BI-WEEKLY (HREMEN)FTE<br />

(HRQP)<br />

SCHEDULED<br />

HOURS/DAY<br />

(HRQP)<br />

DAYS/YR<br />

(HRQP)<br />

(PAY)<br />

PERIODS<br />

PRO-RATE<br />

YES=Check Mark<br />

NO= Leave Blank<br />

RE-CALC CD<br />

130<br />

FIRE SHIFT<br />

EXEMPT<br />

FLSA<br />

(106 hrs X 26)<br />

FIREA 96/120 96/120 1.0 24.0 114.83 26 NO P<br />

135<br />

FIRE SHIFT<br />

NON-<br />

EXEMPT<br />

FLSA<br />

(106 hrs X 26)<br />

FIREA 96/120 96/120 1.0 24.0 114.83 26 NO P<br />

Actual Days<br />

Scheduled<br />

(365÷3) 121.67<br />

Total Days<br />

Differential 6.84<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> FLSA Calendar*<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief<br />

*PayClass-Calendar&Etc-As <strong>of</strong> 05(14)07-r03.xls


• Current vacant positions not attracting high performing employees due<br />

to lack <strong>of</strong> incentives and compensation<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> retention incentives not enticing experienced personnel to<br />

continue working after reaching retirement eligibility.<br />

• Only 4 <strong>Fire</strong> Suppression Personnel currently have 25 or more years <strong>of</strong><br />

service (Many are buying time to leave)<br />

• 41 fire suppression personnel eligible for retirement in 2.5 years / 2015<br />

• Each year thereafter large groups <strong>of</strong> hires will become eligible for<br />

retirement all at once<br />

Comparative Market Retention Policies<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• 11 Battalion Chiefs<br />

• 29 Captains<br />

• (15 Out <strong>of</strong> Class Personnel- moved up)<br />

• 71 <strong>Fire</strong> Engineers<br />

• (20 Out <strong>of</strong> Class Personnel- moved up)<br />

• 27 Senior <strong>Fire</strong>fighters<br />

• 92 <strong>Fire</strong>fighters<br />

1 Year <strong>of</strong> service or less in position<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


• Current <strong>Fire</strong> Budget $20.54 million<br />

• $175.25 per capita for COC fire protection<br />

• ICMA South Atlantic Average<br />

• $201.00 per capita fire on average<br />

• ICMA South Atlantic Average comparable<br />

budget = $23.55 million (2008 funding levels)<br />

International <strong>City</strong>/County Management<br />

Association<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team; Page 75, 81<br />

…It is clearly established in reports dating back close to a decade that the<br />

same problems and issues heard throughout the committee’s work are<br />

recurring...<br />

These chronic issues must be addressed to allow the city to move ahead in a<br />

constructive manner and allow for improved service delivery to the citizens<br />

<strong>of</strong> greater <strong>Columbia</strong>.<br />

TOP PRIORITIES (6-24 MONTHS)<br />

• Revisit previous compensation studies and update as necessary to make<br />

recommendations to address public safety sector recruiting, retention,<br />

and promotion opportunities<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team<br />

June 30 th , 2010<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team;<br />

Page 84<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Department</strong>/Services and EMS<br />

• Substantial pay cuts for employees and services<br />

• Compensation Discrepancies<br />

• <strong>Fire</strong>fighters are working many hours that continue to<br />

increase annually, yet not fairly compensated<br />

• Outstanding tests, classes, and certification examinations<br />

attended and taken <strong>of</strong>f duty without pay<br />

• No funding for specialized training that is required by OSHA<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team<br />

June 30 th , 2010<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team; Page 85<br />

<strong>Attrition</strong><br />

• Cost over the 3 years - $1.75million<br />

• In the last 6 months the department has lost 20+ people<br />

• It costs an additional $400,000 to replace the last 20 people<br />

• Experienced loss <strong>of</strong> 65 firefighters<br />

• Availability <strong>of</strong> qualified personnel to fit leadership capacities are lacking<br />

• Losing best and brightest—remain for short period <strong>of</strong> time; then leave for<br />

greater opportunities in larger metropolitan areas (CLT, ATL)<br />

• Incentive Programs to retain and/or attract best people<br />

• Healthcare: Irmo <strong>Fire</strong> District has recently upgraded to provide fully<br />

paid healthcare for employee retention purposes<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> Mayor-Elect Steve Benjamin’s Transition Team<br />

June 30 th , 2010<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


1. Fulfill 2007 Public Safety Retention <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> 6.67%<br />

2. Market Rate Adjustment for all ranks<br />

a. Competitive Fair Market Value for fully<br />

experienced & consistently performing employees<br />

b. Address compression and overlap in each rank<br />

c. High-Performance Employee Compensation<br />

3. Adjustment <strong>of</strong> FLSA Work Schedule to 114.83 Days<br />

4. 170 Hour Holiday Benefit parity<br />

5. Longevity incentives for retention <strong>of</strong> experienced<br />

personnel<br />

Proposed <strong>Attrition</strong> Action Items<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief


Funding Sources<br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Columbia</strong>; Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Fire</strong> Chief

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!