High Performance, Low Cost PIN, APD Receivers in Fiber Optical ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Performance of APD comes with price! • Trade-off 1: Bandwidth~ Responsivity • InGaAs Absorption Layer Thickness • Trade-off 2: RC Bandwidth ~ Transit Time Bandwidth • InGaAs, InP layer thickness • Device geometry • Trade-off 3: BW@ M~10 ~ BW@ M~3 • Multiplication layer doping • Diffusion junction depth control (Ehet control) • Trade-off 4: Breakdown Voltage ~ Thickness, Doping • InGaAs, InP layer thickness • Multiplication layer doping WOCC-2005
APD Design- Balance between Trade-offs 10 APD Bandwidth vs. Gain 3 dB Bandwidth (GHz) 1 1 10 100 Gain WOCC-2005
Page 1 and 2: High Performance, Low Cost PIN, APD
Page 3 and 4: Photodetectors and Optical Receiver
Page 5 and 6: Photoreceiver Sensitivities v.s. Bi
Page 7 and 8: Industry Standard Top-illuminated P
Page 9 and 10: Waveguide Photodetectors (WGPDs)
Page 11 and 12: Multiplication Process Enhance Perf
Page 13 and 14: How does APD Enhance Rx Sensitivity
Page 15 and 16: Planar SACM/SACGM APD • InGaAs/In
Page 17 and 18: Wafer-Fused SHIP APD • Silicon He
Page 19 and 20: Planar InGaAlAs/InAlAs MQW APD •
Page 21: Real-World APD Device Specification
Page 25 and 26: Failure Rates vs. Activation Energy
Page 27 and 28: APD & PIN MSA Receivers • Key Adv
Page 29 and 30: 0.5 8 6 0.4 8 6 0.3 8 6 0.2 8 6 0.1
Page 31 and 32: Next Generation MSA Receiver & ROSA
Page 33 and 34: Path Penalty after 100 km Fiber Rec
Page 35 and 36: Advancement in Access Speed (bit/s)
Page 37 and 38: FTTP Market Market: North America:

High Performance, Low Cost PIN, APD Receivers in Fiber Optical ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?