30.11.2014 Views

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Project Title:<br />

«The use of Information and<br />

Communication Technologies<br />

in the Public Sector<br />

(eGovernment)»<br />

Deliverable D7:<br />

«<strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong>»


Project Title: «The use of Information and Communication<br />

Technologies in the Public Sector (eGovernment)»<br />

Deliverable: «D7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong>»<br />

Prepared for: Observatory for the Greek Information<br />

Society<br />

Prepared by: TREK Consulting<br />

Version: 1.0<br />

Date: April 20, 2007<br />

Comments: Observatory for the Greek Information<br />

Society<br />

The Observatory for the Greek Information Society is 75 % cofunded<br />

by the European Regional Development Fund and 25% by<br />

national funds and operates within the framework of the Operational<br />

Programme "Information Society" (OPIS).


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................5<br />

2 Goals and Objectives of the Projects ...................................................................6<br />

3 Implementation Methodology ..............................................................................7<br />

4 Problems Occurred During the Implementation of the Project ..........................9<br />

5 Project Results “The use of Information and Communication Technologies in<br />

the Public Sector (eGovernment)” ........................................................................... 10<br />

5.1 Conclusions deriving from the Recording of the Existing Situation in<br />

Greece regarding the texts about Strategy and Relevant Studies........................ 10<br />

5.1.1 Conclusions.............................................................................................. 11<br />

5.1.2 Recommendations ................................................................................... 12<br />

5.2 Conclusions deriving from the Understanding of the Existing Situation in<br />

Greece regarding Back Office ........................................................................................ 13<br />

5.2.1 Conclusions.............................................................................................. 13<br />

5.2.2 Recommendations ................................................................................... 16<br />

5.3 Conclusions drawn from the recording of the Existing Situation in Europe<br />

and Internationally and recording of Best Practices................................................. 17<br />

5.3.1 Best Practices Transfer in Greece........................................................... 19<br />

5.4 Conclusions drawn from the research in the skills of Civil Servants in<br />

using ICT ............................................................................................................................ 23<br />

5.4.1 Conclusions.............................................................................................. 25<br />

5.4.2 Recommendations ................................................................................... 28<br />

5.5 Conclusions drawn from Indicators for the quantification of the Public<br />

Administration & eGovernment Secretariat General objectives with regard to<br />

eGovernment..................................................................................................................... 29<br />

5.5.1 Conclusions.............................................................................................. 30<br />

5.5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................... 30<br />

6 eGovernment Opportunities and Lessons Learned ........................................... 32<br />

6.1 SWOT Analysis...................................................................................................... 33<br />

6.2 Useful conclusions drawn from the implementation of complementary<br />

deliverables........................................................................................................................ 34<br />

6.3 Opinion Leaders views ........................................................................................ 35<br />

6.3.1 Different eState development speed...................................................... 35<br />

6.3.2 Interoperability: the key to success....................................................... 35<br />

6.3.3 Process Re-engineering: With the introduction of new eGovernment<br />

services work procedures change...................................................................... 35<br />

6.3.4 Motives: encourage all parties to take part in the effort ...................... 36<br />

6.3.5 High Level Position for IT <strong>Executive</strong>s ..................................................... 36<br />

6.3.6 eSkills Development of Human Capital .................................................. 36<br />

7 Proposals – Next Steps for the development of eGovernment in Greece........ 37<br />

7.1 GROUP 1: Actions Concerning Strategic Convergence and Publicity........ 37<br />

7.1.1 Action 1: Enactment of Publicity Rules concerning eGovernment<br />

Projects ............................................................................................................... 37<br />

7.1.2 Action 2: Formation of Contracts and Studies Repositoty in all Public<br />

Sector Institutions. ............................................................................................. 38<br />

7.1.3 Action 3: Formation of Central Repository concerning eGovernment<br />

Studies ................................................................................................................ 39<br />

7.1.4 Action 4: Delimitation of Public Authority Model Guide......................... 39<br />

7.2 GROUP 2: Actions Concerning Human Resource Development................. 40<br />

7.2.1 Action 5: Motivation to Human Resources to develop skills for ICT<br />

usage 40<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 3


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.2.2 Action 6: Measurement of e-skills and creation of skills profile for<br />

Public Servants ................................................................................................... 41<br />

7.2.3 Action 7: Development of Skills (Training) of Human Resources ......... 41<br />

7.2.4 Action 8: Development of Professional Profile for Information<br />

Technology (IT) Departments ............................................................................ 42<br />

7.3 GROUP 3: Actions Concerning the Development of Infrastructure that<br />

Supports eGovernment ................................................................................................... 43<br />

7.3.1 Action 9: Five year Plan for the replacement of Proprietary Applications<br />

43<br />

7.3.2 Action 10: Digital Content Creation........................................................ 44<br />

7.3.3 Action 11: Enrichment of Back-office systems with additional modules<br />

44<br />

7.3.4 Action 12: Development of Human Resource Management Systems<br />

(HRMS)................................................................................................................ 45<br />

7.3.5 Action 13: Development of national user authentication system (eID)45<br />

7.3.6 Action 14: Development of eProcurement System for Local<br />

Governments....................................................................................................... 46<br />

7.4 GROUP 4: Horizontal (Parallel) Actions........................................................... 47<br />

7.4.1 Action 15: Measurement of the Initial Indicators Value of the<br />

Measurement Framework................................................................................... 47<br />

7.4.2 Action 16: Set of Target for the entire Public Sector – Roadmap to<br />

eGovernment ...................................................................................................... 48<br />

7.4.3 Action 17: Review of the initial Measurement framework (Version 2).49<br />

7.4.4 Action 18: Crisis Management and Disaster Recovery Plan.................. 50<br />

7.5 Hierarchy of Actions ............................................................................................ 51<br />

7.6 Proposal Framework Objectives........................................................................ 52<br />

7.6.1 Growth of Competitiveness in Greece .................................................... 52<br />

7.6.2 Growth of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) ............................................. 53<br />

7.6.3 Improvement of the performance of Greece in international<br />

measurements .................................................................................................... 53<br />

7.6.4 Improvement of Administrative Capacity of Public Administration ...... 53<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 4


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

1 Introduction<br />

The present deliverable under the title “<strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong>” is implemented in the<br />

framework project supported by the Observatory for the Greek Information Society with the<br />

title «The use of Information and Communication technologies in the Public Sector<br />

(eGovernment)».<br />

The objective of the present deliverable is the formation of a synopsis concerning the results<br />

of the study as an executive summary and the formation of proposed actions for the<br />

development of eGovernment in Greece. In the framework of the present deliverable, a<br />

creative synthesis and presentation of the most significant findings that arouse from the<br />

implementation of the previous stages – phases of the project are presented.<br />

In Section two (2) of the present deliverable its objectives and Purpose are described, while<br />

in Section three (3) the deliverable’s implementation methodology is described.<br />

In Section four (4), problems that encountered during implementation of the project are<br />

summarized.<br />

In section five (5) there is reference to the conclusions organized in each deliverable of the<br />

project. It includes a short description, conclusions and proposed actions for each deliverable.<br />

In section six (6) opportunities and lessons learned throughout the implementation of the<br />

project are presented.<br />

Finally, in section seven (7) proposed actions are represented for the implementation of<br />

actions with regard to the development of eGovernment in Greece.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 5


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

2 Goals and Objectives of the Projects<br />

eGovernment is the means in order for Public Administration to become:<br />

• Extrovert and transparent, by encouraging the participation of all parties (citizens<br />

and businesses) to democratic procedures<br />

• More focused to services, by providing individualized and complete services to each<br />

citizen.<br />

• Productive, by distributing the maximum benefit from the contributions of tax payers<br />

The aim of the present project was to contribute creatively to the configuration of the<br />

development framework of eGovernment up to the level of Central Public Administration and<br />

contribution to the implementation of actions that promote the goals of the above axes.<br />

The objectives of the project are summarized in the following points:<br />

1. Complete presentation of the present status of Public Administration in Greece in Central<br />

level, in the strategic level as well as in the level of recording projects concerning the<br />

development of back-office systems<br />

2. Review of European and International environment concerning the progress indicated in<br />

eGovernment<br />

3. Collection of Best Practices and appointment of the main priority sectors internationally<br />

concerning eGovernment actions and at the same time comparison with the aims of<br />

eGovernment in Greece.<br />

4. Conduction of survey for the impression of e-skills of public servants in order to make<br />

known the areas where State actions have to be focused. These results will assist the<br />

procedure of staffing Public Sector with servants able to cope with Information Society<br />

demands and ready to function effectively in the upcoming digital environment.<br />

5. Configuration of complete, efficient and well-aimed measurement framework for the<br />

quantification of the national strategic objectives on eGovernment, as well as observation<br />

of the implications of eGovernment to the society and to economy.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 6


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

3 Implementation Methodology<br />

The implementation of the present deliverable was achieved through the exploitation of<br />

the results of the overall work of deliverables and through the opinions and<br />

experience of opinion leaders in the ICT (Information and Communication<br />

Technology) Market, whose perception on matters regarding eGovernment is<br />

important.<br />

The main topic areas included in the implementation process of the executive summary are:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Deliverable Results Analysis<br />

Analysis of Best Practices and of the International Environment<br />

Interview Conduct with opinion leaders and results analysis<br />

Conclusion Shaping<br />

Organization of Actions and Proposals<br />

Interrelation of Action – taking with Best Practices and International Environment<br />

The above process is outlined in the following figure:<br />

Figure 1: Methodology of Deliverable Elaboration<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 7


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

In summary, the starting point of the works undertaken of results development as well as the<br />

proposal and action development in the aim of further development of eGovernment in<br />

Greece is the exploitation of the deliverables of the project. The successive steps taken are<br />

based on the analysis carried out with regards to the international environment, the best<br />

practices, the deliverables of the project and results coming from the collection<br />

and analysis of interviews and opinions from the part of opinion Leaders in the<br />

Greek ICT Market.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 8


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

4 Problems Occurred During the Implementation of the Project<br />

Within the framework of the project implementation, a wealth of problems was dealt with,<br />

different ones in each phase of the project. More specifically, the following problems<br />

occurred:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Incapacity to find strategic text and study material which would be available either in<br />

a certain authority or in an internet site. Information is dispersed and this is why the<br />

general public has no easy access to it.<br />

Difficulty in finding the executives in charge, who would be ready to provide valid<br />

answers regarding matters which concerned the overall project (e.g. the availability<br />

of strategic text and study material, the main problems in Public Administration etc.).<br />

Mostly, the main problem was that the executives could not allocate the necessary<br />

time in order to make a thorough and meticulous appreciation of the issues dealt with<br />

within the project frame.<br />

Delayed response of officials with which the Contractor came in touch in order to<br />

receive the information required (e.g. texts- studies)<br />

Difficulty in applying a uniform process in the collection of data and information<br />

Lack of data and knowledge on behalf of the executives in charge of Authorities for<br />

the body of the applications / systems existing in their Authority.<br />

All the above mentioned points should be conceived as everyday problems in the Public<br />

Sector and as such it would be advisable that they be dealt with according to a total copingplan.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 9


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

5 Project Results “The use of Information and Communication<br />

Technologies in the Public Sector (eGovernment)”<br />

5.1 Conclusions deriving from the Recording of the Existing Situation in Greece<br />

regarding the texts about Strategy and Relevant Studies<br />

In this unit, texts about strategies and relevant studies have been collected which were<br />

implemented and concern eGovernment as well as the modernization of Public<br />

Administration.<br />

Six texts on Strategy were collected, namely:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

The Operational Programme «POLITEIA»<br />

The Operational Programme «Information Society»<br />

The Operational Programme «Digital Convergence», Ministry of Economy and Finance<br />

The Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative Capacity of public<br />

Administration 2007-2013», Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and<br />

Decentralization<br />

o «Broadband Access to Information Society» (version 1)<br />

This text presents the network of the strategic choices of the country throughout the year<br />

and depicts the existing switch from the sterile and obsolete dedication to the use of<br />

Information and Communication Technology to the sphericity with which the issue of<br />

eGovernment is dealt with currently, taking into consideration not only the technological<br />

dimension of the issue but also the modernization – reengineering of the operational<br />

processes in the Public Administration.<br />

The above mentioned texts are analytically presented in Deliverable D1: “Report on the<br />

existing situation in Greece- Collection of strategic and relevant study texts”<br />

In the same deliverable, 22 studies were collected, a figure relatively small in relation to the<br />

research work produced in other European Union countries or compared to the number of<br />

studies carried out in Greece which concern in various ways eGovernment. This “basket”<br />

containing the 22 studies has the following characteristics:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

At a substantially important degree, the object of part of the studies is overlapped,<br />

without any connection made between these studies (updating, references to<br />

previous studies etc.)<br />

It is evident, from the mere evaluation of the studies, that there is no strategic<br />

targeting in their context. In other words, they were not conducted aiming at<br />

specialising towards strategic directions, nor their context is associated to strategic<br />

directions which should be posed and should form the basis for every study related to<br />

eGovernment.<br />

A big part of these studies has a recording character which means that the<br />

research conducted has not contributed satisfactorily to the forming of proposals,<br />

policies and strategies.<br />

There are studies concerning specific sectors of Public Administration (e.g. use of<br />

smart cards in the sector of Social Insurance), but at the same time there are not<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 10


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

such studies concerning Public Administration as a whole or at least the sectors in<br />

which the use of similar technologies would be possible.<br />

5.1.1 Conclusions<br />

In order to collect the material required for the studies (deliverable D1), despite the effort to<br />

apply a more structured and definitely organised methodological frame, it was required to<br />

deal with each Authority using a different approach, as a result of the different way of dealing<br />

with the “studies archive” in each one of them. Indeed, using the term “studies archive” is<br />

risky, since an overwhelming majority of these studies are dispersed in the records of<br />

different Organizational Units and sometimes even in the personal records of the Authority<br />

executives.<br />

In total, six strategic texts and twenty - two studies were collected. The studies involve the<br />

evolution of the sector ICT (1), Information Society (9), eGovernment (8), eBusiness (2),<br />

Systems Security (1) and Digital Health (1).<br />

Graph1. Distribution of Studies per Subject<br />

Digital Health: 1<br />

System Security: 1 Evolution of ICT<br />

Market: 1<br />

e-business: 2<br />

Information Socierty:<br />

9<br />

eGovernment: 8<br />

The majority of these studies were conducted during the year 2004, which means that there<br />

is substantial delay in current research work.<br />

Graph 2. Recording of Studies per year of implementation<br />

Year 2003: 4<br />

Year 2000: 1<br />

Year 2005: 4<br />

Year 2004: 13<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 11


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Apart from the studies collected, the existence of an important number of studies (not<br />

widespread) was verifies (mainly application studies for small and medium eGovernment<br />

projects), whose tracking down was not particularly easy. Despite their low budget and the<br />

relatively limited publicity they have received, these studies consist of a research work which<br />

is retained as important/ crucial given the fact that they bear a direct relationship and effect<br />

to the quality and the characteristics of eGovernment in our country. This is due to the fact<br />

that these studies determine the requirements of eGovernment systems in Greece (e.g.<br />

studies concerning the planning of the projects mentioned in invitation 114 in the context of<br />

ACTION LINE 2.2: «eGovernment for Citizen services», Operational Programme «Information<br />

Society») which are developed or going to be developed in Greece over the next two (2)<br />

years.<br />

Despite the fact that the strategic direction for “openness” and “citizen information”<br />

concerns Public Administration and its activities as a whole, in many sectors the concept of<br />

“limited publicity” is permanent with regards to the research work conducted by them. The<br />

concept that any study conducted involves only the Authority the former derives from and<br />

that it is the Authority’s “property” which should not be publicised, is still present in the<br />

mind of many officials (at all grades of Managerial Hierarchy). Typical of this attitude is the<br />

fact that during the conduction of the present deliverable, the project team faced incidents<br />

where the officials were reluctant to give out the necessary data they were asked due to all<br />

the above mentioned reasons.<br />

As mentioned above, the studies described in the deliverable were not conducted in order to<br />

specialise strategic directions, their context is not associated to strategic directions, nor<br />

do they exploit the results of previous studies. These studies constitute ad hoc efforts of<br />

the Contractors.<br />

The corpus of these studies is neither updated nor repeated regularly, so after a certain<br />

period of time their context may not be exploitable.<br />

5.1.2 Recommendations<br />

it is essential to establish a Repository for texts and studies which concern eGovernment.<br />

Except for the collection of the existing studies, it is recommendable to oblige the Authorities<br />

to inform this Repository about the studies they conduct and their results as well as to<br />

publicize their deliverables. An example of a similar effort is the creation of a digital library by<br />

the Observatory for the Greek Information Society, a body that could perfectly constitute the<br />

previously mentioned reference point (Repository). Along with the Repository recommended,<br />

the foundation of decentralized repositories is evaluated, perhaps for every Authority, for the<br />

eGovernment studies and projects conducted or underway.<br />

Is should be noted and fully understood that an eGovernment project is not a process which<br />

involves solely the Contractor, but the whole Society and its citizens. Based on the experience<br />

acquired after the implementation of the project, it is recommended to conduct, legislate and<br />

comply with publicity guidelines (presentations, seminars etc.) for all eGovernment projects<br />

(be they studies or projects of systems development).<br />

Lastly, the enactment and planning of revision of certain important studies will back up<br />

among others the better exploitation of their results, the prevention of tendering similar<br />

projects – studies which may produce uncertain results and the updating of useful data which<br />

could be used for assessment over time.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 12


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

5.2 Conclusions deriving from the Understanding of the Existing Situation in<br />

Greece regarding Back Office<br />

The tracing of the present situation regarding the Back Office systems involve systems which<br />

are in operation currently.<br />

More specifically, in deliverable D2: “Report on Back Office systems of Public Administration<br />

Authorities” 28 systems of public authorities are recorded which are in operation productively<br />

and there is reference to 18 management systems / applications.<br />

Graph 3. Systems and Application Concernng Organization , Operation and<br />

Communication<br />

Document Management<br />

Digital Register<br />

Total Number of Agencies<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

In addition, reference is being made to the Legislative Framework which permeates<br />

important sectors of Information Society relevant to eGovernment. The presentation concerns<br />

the Greek Legislative and Institutional Framework as well as the relevant EU guidelines with<br />

which the Greek Legislation complies.<br />

5.2.1 Conclusions<br />

The most widespread systems applied in the public sectors are the Office Automation<br />

Systems and e-mail clients which are used – where available – to cater for the basic needs<br />

of the authorities such as the drafting and format of documents, account sheets for financial<br />

reports, e-mail etc.<br />

At the same time, in several of the recorded authorities (over 50%), the registration system is<br />

digital, nonetheless, none of the authorities make use of the Document Management and<br />

Workflow Management systems – despite the fact that research pinpointed the existence of<br />

such installed commercial systems.<br />

The effort to communicate with the IT Managers involved in the task of registering was<br />

perhaps the most difficult part in the conduction of the corresponding deliverable. It was<br />

clear that the tracking down of the IT Managers (no matter which title they bore) is a timeconsuming<br />

procedure, of small validity percentage in the answers provided. It takes a lot of<br />

effort and constant communication by telephone in order to track down the executive who<br />

would provide valid answers. In many cases, (almost 1/3 of them), the manager did not<br />

respond either on the phone or by setting an appointment, which resulted in incapacity of<br />

registering the entity of the systems.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 13


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Graph 4. Communication with IT Managers<br />

Uncomplete<br />

communication: 12<br />

Communication<br />

completed: 28<br />

Graph 5. Completed Communication with IT Managers<br />

Telephone: 15<br />

Meeting: 13<br />

From the records it was evident that in many cases the IT Managers had no knowledge and<br />

no easy access to the contract data (of implementation or support) of the Information<br />

systems undertaken by the Authority they work for. Furthermore, it was not rare for the IT<br />

Managers not to have the knowledge required (not on an official basis at least) about the IT<br />

work carried out within their department.<br />

Taking one step further, due to the non- consistent and systematic development of the IT<br />

infrastructure of Public Sector, nowadays there are proprietary systems (especially in MS<br />

Access and MS Excel) which are ignored and not officially supported by the IT Department.<br />

There is also a great number of systems which have been internally developed, without<br />

fulfilling terms of interoperability, open architecture, scalability, demand recording,<br />

documentation, support, etc.<br />

A result of the unorganised and unstructured IT infrastructure development is the existence<br />

of a great number of systems in Access and Excel, developed by the employees themselves,<br />

which operate along with Back Office systems or in several cases substitute the functions<br />

which should normally be incorporated in them.<br />

Last but not least, the mentality of “working in the shadows” within the framework of a team<br />

or service is still evident and it has a negative impact on the operation of the Authority and in<br />

general of Public Administration.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 14


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Graph 6. Proprietary Applications<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Applications Developed in Access Applications Developed in Excel Applications Developed Applications in Developed Cobol in Cobol and they have<br />

The registration has shown that the systems are interconnected at a very low percentage. In<br />

each Authority there are few systems interconnected from the inside. Interconnection cases<br />

concern mainly portals which receive data from the Authority Information system.<br />

Interconnections with exterior systems are rare and mainly concern the interconnection of<br />

banking systems (e.g. DIAS).<br />

Graph 7. System Interoperability<br />

Internal<br />

communication with<br />

other systems: 13,03%<br />

Systems<br />

interconnected: 18,07%<br />

Stand Alone: 68,91%<br />

There is a great number of systems (this reference concerns systems developed by<br />

Contracting Companies) for which there are no valid support contracts. Additionally, the<br />

systems supported via SLAs (Service Level Agreement) are few and mainly systems<br />

developed over the last few years. It is evident that the implications either in the financial<br />

planning or the cost for the support of the system are quite important.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 15


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Graph 8. Systems Support<br />

Systems that are<br />

supported (contract<br />

exists): 20,59%<br />

SLAs: 1,68%<br />

Systems that are not<br />

supported (no<br />

contract): 77,73%<br />

5.2.2 Recommendations<br />

The establishment of the Repository in every Authority which will include all the data<br />

involving information systems developed by the Authority, the relevant contracts of<br />

implementation and support and the support contracts seems to be required. The filling<br />

in of the most important data in an information system could prove to be particularly useful<br />

for the total control and planning of each Authority and the Public Administration in general.<br />

The information system with the contract data could be interconnected to similar applications<br />

of the e-Procurement project in course, providing cohesive information at a focal level.<br />

The structured way of observing either the implementation of information technology<br />

projects or the Service Level Agreement (or SLAs) from the IT department constitutes an<br />

important feature of every Authority. The reengineering of the processes of an authority and<br />

the confrontation of the issue at a central – political – level is required.<br />

The improvement and development of the officials professional status is identified<br />

in the upgrading of their roles (described in the previous paragraph). The personnel<br />

qualification on issues of project management, knowledge management etc. as well as the<br />

legislation of IT departments will contribute towards the direction of improving and<br />

developing their professional profile, solving the same time problems presented in the present<br />

analysis.<br />

The substitution of proprietary systems developed by employees with modules of Back<br />

Office systems developed by each Authority, is demanded, if the target is to apply a strategic<br />

direction in the technological upgrading of the Authorities of Public Administration,<br />

organisational reengineering, interoperability and, finally, providing of complete<br />

eGovernment services to the citizens and businesses.<br />

The interconnection of the systems in the Authorities has to be studied upon and realized<br />

within the wider frame of interoperability and collaboration in Public Administration. For<br />

this reason, a total plan of system interoperability has to be developed, which will create the<br />

suitable conditions for the interconnection of the systems in a second phase.<br />

Finally, the implementation of a Guide for the exemplary Ministry – General Secretariat<br />

concerning IT infrastructure and organizational support systems could become a very useful<br />

tool for the implementation of the Strategic Planning of the Government<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 16


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

5.3 Conclusions drawn from the recording of the Existing Situation in Europe<br />

and Internationally and recording of Best Practices<br />

Deliverables D4: “Review of the International Environment” and D5: “Recording and<br />

Evaluation of Best Practices” include:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

A review of the international environment in the eGovernment sector aiming at<br />

collecting and assessing data which concern the strategy and business planning, the<br />

organisational structures and their results among E.U. countries.<br />

Recording and evaluation of the Best Practices in eGovernment sector in order to<br />

pinpoint the top developments at a European and International level, their critical<br />

assessment and the examination of the possibilities and the most fruitful method for<br />

their exploitation in our country.<br />

In total, 72 Best Practices were collected. In the following Graphs their allocation is<br />

presented in terms of topic unit and country of origin.<br />

Graph 9. Best Practices shorted per category<br />

eProcurement: 6<br />

Digital Documents/<br />

Digital IDs: 14<br />

Services; 50<br />

Digital Democracy/<br />

Digital Participation:<br />

2<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 17


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Graph 10. Best Practices per Country of Origin<br />

Singapore<br />

Brazi<br />

Australia<br />

Finland<br />

Chech Republic<br />

Slovakia<br />

Poland<br />

Hungary<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Lithuania<br />

Cyprus<br />

Spain<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Greece<br />

Germany<br />

USA<br />

Canada<br />

Slovenia<br />

Holland<br />

Malta<br />

Latvia<br />

Ireland<br />

Esthonia<br />

Belgium<br />

Austria<br />

Korea<br />

Sweden<br />

Portugal<br />

Italy<br />

Danmark<br />

France<br />

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3, 5<br />

From this study and the collection of data for the conduct of Deliverables D4 and D5 it was<br />

observed that there are some dominant tendencies regarding eGovernment in Europe, which<br />

are:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Interoperability: The interoperability of the systems is at the core of the countries’<br />

interest as it is a basic requirement for the development of eGovernment. At a system<br />

level or at a level of interoperability model development, the interconnection and data<br />

exchange for the IT systems constitutes the main strategic goal at a European level.<br />

Security: the security of transactions is an issue that worries all the people involved<br />

in eGovernment. It goes without saying that as eGovernment service users increase<br />

so will the attacks at portals and IT systems, a fact that necessitates the application<br />

of high security systems. What’s more, is the focus on digital signature from the<br />

Public Sector.<br />

Infrastructure: Many countries, which do not have the infrastructure required in IT<br />

systems and telecommunications, undertake demanding projects, like the one<br />

undertaken by the National Network of Public Administration “SYZEFXIS” carried out<br />

in Greece.<br />

Change Management & Organizational Change: the Change Management is<br />

particularly considered which derives from the eGovernment entrance in the<br />

operation and organisation of the Public Authorities and in the adaptation of citizens<br />

to the new e-State and their familiarisation to the new technologies developed. Of<br />

course, this transition does not only remain at a technological level (substitution of<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 18


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

the physical presence of the citizen in the Public Department with an “electronic<br />

visit”- communication) but also creates chain-changes in either the organisation or<br />

the skills of civil servants. This is why there is particular interest in changes of<br />

organisational and operational levels in the Public Authorities as well as in<br />

cooperation issues and inter- service functions.<br />

Increase of the services provided by eGovernment: all over Europe and at an<br />

international level, eGovernment projects are developed and designed on a large<br />

scale, projects which involve either the provision of new services (of a greater digital<br />

integration degree- online sophistication) or surpass the limited borders of proprietary<br />

Authorities and concern Security, Interoperability, Model Creation etc.<br />

Support Structures: the study on Best Practices has shown that in almost every<br />

country, State Structures have been developed which are involved in eGovernment.<br />

These structures support eGovernment at a Strategic level, at an implementation<br />

level as well as at a level of support and security.<br />

We should note at this point that the complete study text is electronically available at:<br />

http://www.observatory.gr/page/default.asp?1a=1&id=22&pl=110&pk=292&ap=101.<br />

5.3.1 Best Practices Transfer in Greece<br />

Having located and enhanced the progress made in Europe and in developed countries<br />

around the world in the sector of eGovernment, one has the possibility to compare the<br />

progress made in these countries and the progress made in Greece and choose among<br />

Practices which could be adopted in Greece. These practices could function as models for the<br />

improvement of infrastructures and high impact services.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 19


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Taking into consideration all the data coming from Best Practices included in deliverable D5,<br />

eight (8) of them were chosen and are recommended, which could be incorporated in the<br />

Greek reality (with the implementation of similar action) and would create the necessary<br />

conditions for further development of eGovernment. These Best Practices are:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Best Practice for Infrastructure<br />

Development<br />

Personal ID (Belgium)<br />

Communication infrastructures for<br />

intergovernmental collaboration<br />

(Ireland)<br />

Permanent maintenance of electronic<br />

files (S. Korea)<br />

Governmental Site Builder (Germany)<br />

Best Practice for Service Development<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Electronic Invoicing System<br />

(Denmark)<br />

Business Link (United Kingdom)<br />

Retirement prediction in real time<br />

(United Kingdom)<br />

Work research services and<br />

personnel recruitment from the<br />

National Workmarket Council<br />

(Sweden)<br />

In the following extracts, apart from an overall reference to each of the Best Practice<br />

mentioned above, reference is being made to the objectives and benefits from their adoption<br />

in Greece.<br />

Personal ID (Belgium)<br />

The Personal ID is an electronic identity card which facilitates the<br />

Belgian citizens to access eGovernment services.<br />

The card has the size of an ordinary bank card and contains, among<br />

over identification data, a photo of the holder and his/her national<br />

register number. These data are printed on the card and<br />

incorporated in the form of an electronic chip in the inside. The chip<br />

contains two electronic key groups, which aid in the identification of<br />

the holder and the use of legally valid electronic signature.<br />

Respectively, the creation of a Greek e-card for electronic transactions would offer easy<br />

identification of the holder (one of the biggest problems which prevent the development of<br />

eGovernment services), it would prevent the use of various and diverse identification data in<br />

Public Services and it would function as an incentive for Public Authorities in order to develop<br />

services where the citizen will be able to use his/her card) and for the citizens who will realise<br />

that the use of eGovernment services in Greece is rapidly developing. The first attempt to<br />

create a National User Identification System (Subproject 9 concerning the realization of Public<br />

Key Infrastructure and electronic signatures from the National Network of Public<br />

Administration “SYZEFXIS”), has been designed and its realization is expected to start in the<br />

second semester of 2007.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 20


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Communication Infrastructures for intergovernmental collaboration (Ireland)<br />

Through the creation of an official authority for the<br />

improvement and the completion of services for<br />

clients/citizens of Public Sector services, Ireland<br />

developed the IAMS to support the electronic data<br />

exchange. The IAMS has originally allowed the<br />

electronic data exchange concerning citizens’ dates of<br />

birth, between the Registry Office (GRO) and the<br />

Ministry of Social Services and the Central Statistic<br />

Organisation (CSO).<br />

It is obvious that one of the most important points which is also a serious obstacle to the<br />

development of cohesive eGovernment services, is the inability of Public Services to<br />

collaborate and exchange data which are common. Indeed, different social services keep<br />

records with the same data, instead of collaborating and sharing them. Such an initiative<br />

would facilitate the creation of Databases, while at the same time it would reduce the bulk of<br />

data maintained and managed by each Authority, bringing substantial benefits in terms of<br />

productiveness and efficiency.<br />

Permanent Maintenance of Electronic Files (S. Korea)<br />

For the assurance of access, confidentiality and<br />

integrity of the electronic files (even after some<br />

decades), in any technology infrastructure<br />

environment (hardware & software), the Archives and<br />

Register National Service in Korea has promoted the<br />

development of permanent maintenance of electronic<br />

files, producing the adequate software. In this way<br />

various electronic files are permanently maintained<br />

without running the risk of being altered or changed in<br />

any way.<br />

With the creation (adoption) of similar technologies, access, confidentiality and integrity of<br />

electronic data throughout Public Administration will be ensured, as well as the use and<br />

exploitation of all the electronic files, even in case of transformation of information systems<br />

(and technologies). This could be a demand included in the design of the total of information<br />

systems which will be developed for Public Authorities.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 21


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Governmental Site Builder (Germany)<br />

The Governmental Site Builder (GSB) is a Content<br />

Management System (CMS) for the activities of the<br />

German Federal Government in the Internet, Intranet<br />

and Extranet. The GSB contains integral subsystem<br />

models for all the standard operations of a CMS. These<br />

subsystems can be adopted in their present form, be<br />

specially developed or supplement one of the already<br />

existent operations according to the needs of the service<br />

The adoption of such a software from the Greek Public Administration, will support in the best<br />

possible way the procedures of citizen service (creation of one-stop-shop in Public services,<br />

Citizen Service Centres etc.) while at the same time it will greatly contribute to the creation<br />

and provision of uniform eGovernment services.<br />

Electronic Invoicing System (Denmark)<br />

Since February 2005 all the public authorities in<br />

Denmark are obliged to receive providers’ invoices only<br />

in electronic form. In this way, all public sectors had to<br />

modify their systems and administrative procedures in<br />

order to make the transition from the handwritten to<br />

the digital management of invoices, credits and other<br />

similar transactions with the respective public<br />

providers. This specific change concerns in total 15 millions of invoices per year<br />

approximately and involves all the spectrum of public sector, from state ministries to<br />

kindergartens.<br />

The application- adoption of this system will save huge sums of money in the public sector, it<br />

will decrease the transaction time requires and will contribute in the simplification of internal<br />

procedures of the authorities, it will increase the digital content diminishing at the same time<br />

paper files. Its mandatory status guarantees the obligatory updating of public systems with<br />

the simultaneous reorganisation of administrative procedures. The adoption of this Best<br />

Practice can be associated to the realization framework set by the National System of<br />

Electronic Public Procurements.<br />

Επιχειρησιακός Σύνδεσμος (Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο)<br />

The Business Link provides small companies with full<br />

access services to the public authorities. The main goals<br />

of this link are: 1) to provide a collective source of<br />

practical advice and information for businesses<br />

(especially mass media), 2)to provide a central match<br />

point between mass media and government services.<br />

The creation of a kind of “digital citizen service centre”<br />

for the Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) will aid the<br />

development of entrepreneurship; will reduce the cost and time of transactions between the<br />

SMEs and the Public Services, boosting business competitiveness.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 22


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

It is worth mentioning that CSCs already offer certain eServices to businesses, which are<br />

limited, however, in informative capacity.<br />

Retirement Prediction in Real Time (United Kingdom)<br />

By using this electronic service, the British citizens, after<br />

adequate identification, can come in touch with the<br />

Pension Department of the Ministry of Labour & Pensions,<br />

and electronically submit their application for IPF in case of<br />

premature retirement and receive an electronic reply of the<br />

real-time calculation.<br />

The calculation of retirement allows the citizen to reflect<br />

upon and decide the precise retirement time. It gives<br />

everyone the opportunity to have access to the same piece of information, it reduces the<br />

number of citizens who resort to public services, it increases service levels and allows the<br />

future pensioner to prepare a complete file with all the necessary data required for his<br />

retirement. In this way, mistakes made during the procedure of the issuing of the pension are<br />

eliminated.<br />

Work research services and personnel recruitment from the National<br />

Workmarket Council (Sweden)<br />

The «Job vacancy Bank» is a site through which all the vacancies<br />

which exist in the Offices of Occupational Information in Sweden,<br />

are published on the Internet. The publication of vacancies is<br />

accompanied by a series of extra interactive electronic services<br />

which concern either unemployed people or those who wish to<br />

change their career.<br />

The creation of a personnel research service via Internet gives the<br />

chance to all the interested parties (employers, employees,<br />

unemployed etc.) to communicate. The goal of this service is to reduce bureaucracy and to<br />

promote equality among the interested parties.<br />

5.4 Conclusions drawn from the research in the skills of Civil Servants in using<br />

ICT<br />

Deliverable D3: “Research in the skills of civil servants in the use of ICT” refers to the<br />

conclusions from the research done to define the level of skills of the human capital that<br />

works for Public Administration (PA) regarding ICT skills.<br />

The aim of this research was to shed light on the existing readiness of the human capital in<br />

PA in terms of ICT skills, in order to determine the number of individuals that have to be<br />

trained, the sectors in which their training should focus on, as well as the training pace<br />

required in order for the existing and new public systems to be promptly and sufficiently<br />

supported.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 23


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

The research on the ICT skills of civil servants took place between December 2006 and<br />

March 2007, after a pilot study in 80 employees, 15 Information Technology<br />

<strong>Executive</strong>s and 5 Managers between 08/11 and 27/11/06.<br />

The data collection procedure was carried out using the “drop & collect” method which<br />

involves:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Telephone communication with the sample group in order to meet one specific<br />

person from the sample group<br />

Visit of the researcher to the Service in order to hand out the questionnaires to fill<br />

in and to arrange the date of submission<br />

Second visit of the researcher to the Service for the collection of the answered<br />

questionnaires<br />

The research was divided into three sub studies which referred to a different sample frame<br />

and the number of filled-in questionnaires is presented in the table that follows.<br />

Study 1<br />

Study 2<br />

Study 3<br />

Categories<br />

General Managers<br />

(Ministries and General<br />

Secretariats)<br />

It <strong>Executive</strong>s<br />

(Tax Offices, Urban Planning<br />

Offices, Ministries and General<br />

Secretariats)<br />

Servants<br />

(Tax Offices, Urban Planning<br />

Offices, Ministries and General<br />

Secretariats)<br />

Number of<br />

Answered<br />

Questionnaires<br />

43<br />

215<br />

1919<br />

With regards to the Research carried out among the employees, the distribution pattern of<br />

the participants in the different services is the one shown in the graph that follows.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 24


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

77% of the sample comes from the Attica region while 23% from the rest of Greece, with<br />

Central Macedonia participating in 7% of the sample. 57% of the sample was women, 91%<br />

of whom were between 25 and 54 years old. The academic level of the sample, as shown in<br />

the following diagram, was mainly of Higher Education.<br />

5.4.1 Conclusions<br />

Despite the fact that infrastructures in information technology are at a satisfactory level, they<br />

are not extensively used by the employees. The use of such technologies is basically limited<br />

to the use of computers, necessary for the conduction of their duties. The study has proved<br />

that, (with the exception of the employees working for the Services of Tax Offices who resort<br />

to the software of the department rather than the overall facilities provided by information<br />

technologies), the use of computers is not required for the great majority of employees.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 25


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

At this point, we should refer to the imminent distribution of 50.000 digital certificates<br />

(signatures) by the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization (MIPAD)<br />

over the next few months, which may change the ways of operation and communication of<br />

Public Services. In order to realise this venture successfully, there should be a substantial<br />

number of employees with special skills in ICT, something which is quite difficult for the time<br />

being.<br />

More specifically, the study has shown that there is a certain sufficiency regarding the<br />

employees’ skills in the basic usage of a computer, of course there is a margin of<br />

improvement especially about the skills of level II (text copy, use of Word Processor for text<br />

format and writing, Internet Navigation and searching for information, sending and receiving<br />

e-mails, save – retrieve – copy and moving around files) (the median arises from a five-levels<br />

scale where 1 = «bad» and 5 = «excellent».<br />

Users e-skills per level<br />

Median Range<br />

Skills Level Ι 4.28 0.66<br />

Skills Level ΙΙ 3.99 1.61<br />

Skills Level ΙΙΙ 2.63 1.59<br />

Skills Level ΙV 2.29 1.62<br />

Σύνολο 3.30 1.02<br />

Moreover, the study has shown that there is an important deficiency in the level of Public<br />

Sector employees’ education. Several users- employees have never been taught how to use<br />

a computer, while for many of them the most significant form of education is the organisation<br />

of seminars by their service, the quality of which is doubtful.<br />

The study shows that employees are trained in order to acquire skills, without these<br />

programs to aim to a specific objective and without being part of any Strategic direction of<br />

Public Sector employees’ training effort.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 26


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

An important finding of the research is the diffusion of ICT within the Public Sector, which is<br />

associated with two motives, a positive and a negative one. The positive motivation is a<br />

combination of the employees’ skills in the usage of computers as the well as of the frequency<br />

they use them. On the contrary, the negative motivation is a combination of the existing<br />

bureaucracy within the Public Sector, which reinforces mistrust towards organisational<br />

changes. This mistrust is a counter- motive in the ICT skill development, as the employees<br />

regard these skills as possible threats. It should be highlighted that any of the skills<br />

employees have remain unexploited within the general negative attitude towards ICTs.<br />

At IT Department <strong>Executive</strong>s, a crucial percentage has been noted that states that:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

They do not know/have not been taught how to use computers<br />

They do not use a computer when performing their tasks<br />

IT Department <strong>Executive</strong>s have a higher skill level than the other users, but they seem to be<br />

unable to provide sufficient technical support to the users and information systems, to connect<br />

a computer to a network as well as take some basic action such as form a presentation, use<br />

Excel sheets, etc. Furthermore, according to the study evidence, one out of two IT executives<br />

has not updated his skills in 2006 because of lack of time. Behind this answer we can realize<br />

that executives deny to leave their the everyday work for seminars that they do not<br />

appreciate.<br />

This image is not particularly representative as it depicts an important obstacle in the effort of<br />

expanding the diffusion degrr of ICTs in Public Administration. More specifically, a current<br />

information official is to operate simultaneously as:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Information Intermediate Knot for the services similar to the one he works for.<br />

This means that any problems faced by the users within a service department, but<br />

especially the way of solving these problems, is to be communicated to the users of<br />

other corresponding services, through IT <strong>Executive</strong>s, so that the Public Sector is not<br />

obliged to “reinvent itself” and<br />

Information Transmitter to the headquarters which have the comprehensive duty<br />

of maintenance and desigh of systems and applications, in order to facilitate the<br />

effort to develop user- friendly and efficient systems and applications.<br />

However, without the necessary skills, many IT <strong>Executive</strong>s do not contribute to but prevent<br />

the ICT diffusion process, which- it goes without saying- has multiple consequences.<br />

Lastly, regarding the General Managers, probably the most important conclusion that can be<br />

drawn is that the skills they have in information technologies compared to the ones of simple<br />

users at all levels are somewhat inferior. The study has shown that the General Managers’<br />

skills in ICT have not been certified. This is somewhat expected since General Managers are<br />

usually older than the average age of Public Sector employees (over 50 years of age 71% of<br />

them). (We have to state here that the small number of remarks we collected might not give<br />

us a representative picture).<br />

In addition, despite the fact they acknowledge how important computers are in everyday work,<br />

and they urge their subordinates to use computers, they do not assess highly the importance<br />

of computer skills for their career. We must state here that a big number of General Managers<br />

consider that their Service is focused towards citizens, assist in complains and problems<br />

solving and believe that his Service is positive toward organizational and administrative<br />

changes.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 27


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

5.4.2 Recommendations<br />

According to the conclusions of the study the formation of adequate conditions which will<br />

favour the adoption of ICTs by the employees is totally required.<br />

This can be achieved firstly, with the prompt participation of information official in the design<br />

of new and exploitation of the existing systems. At a second level, it is essential to involve civil<br />

employees in the benefits that can be obtained by the extensive use of information<br />

technologies and how the latter can contribute to attaining the aims of their country’s Digital<br />

Convergence.<br />

However, in the effort of diffusing ICTs a number of issues comes up which have to be dealt<br />

with seriously, even if they have a higher degree of difficulty.<br />

The first priority in this particular measure group has to be the cultural re- orientation, a quite<br />

difficult task for any organisation, much more for the Public Sector. An overwhelming majority<br />

of contemporary studies in business administration conclude that an efficient organisation has<br />

to have strong traits from all sectors of business culture. Greek Public Sector, seems to miss<br />

business culture as an organization and is propose to be developed elements of:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

The Bureaucratic culture – that is the existence of named procedures of action<br />

taking and design to face unexpected/ unpredicted events through a complete<br />

operational plan- the so- called “operations blueprinting” and<br />

The efficiency culture – evaluation of efficiency through standard productivity,<br />

efficiency targets and the assumption of repair measures in cases of target deviation.<br />

The second direction towards which the Public Sector is recommended to move is the<br />

assurance of the appropriate training of its employees. Even if the selection should be made<br />

among people who are familiar with ICTs and have the necessary skills, these employees<br />

should be regularly trained as required by the continuous updates in ICTs.<br />

Finally, an important decision, that should be made on political level, is the selection and<br />

training of those employees which are going to cover executive positions in the IT Sector of<br />

Public Administration. This selection should be make thoughout people who have knowledge<br />

of ICT and have all the necessary qualifications in order to deserve these positions.<br />

Furthermore, these people have to be trained systematically since the constant changes in<br />

ICT demand continuous refreshment of knowledge.<br />

It would be advisable to include fragments of the above recommendations (which couldbbe a<br />

project for developing a management system of the training process and of the training<br />

material, targeting the upgrade of Public Administration through the support of training<br />

programs implemented by the “National Centre of Public Administration and Local<br />

Governments” in the framework of a blended learning model) of for specialized training<br />

programs, in order to achieve the best possible result.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 28


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

5.5 Conclusions drawn from Indicators for the quantification of the Public<br />

Administration & eGovernment Secretariat General objectives with regard to<br />

eGovernment<br />

The aim of deliverable D6 : “Indicators for the quantification of the Public Administration<br />

& eGovernment Secretariat General Objectives with regard to eGovernment” was the<br />

formation of a measurement framework for the quantification of the national strategic<br />

objectives, as they are defined in Operation Programme “Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013” for the 4th Programme Period. The ulterior<br />

aim was that the proposed measurement framework to constitute an official measurement<br />

and evaluation tool of these strategic objectives, seen within the framework of eGovernment<br />

as a basic pattern for the modernization of Public Administration.<br />

The proposed measurement framework is relevant to the measurement framework included<br />

in “Digital Strategy 2006 – 2013”, the indicators analyzed in “i2010 eGovernment Action<br />

Plan: Accelerating eGovernment in Europe for the Benefit of All” as well as with the<br />

proposed indicators of the project evaluating impact of eGovernment “eGovernment<br />

Economics Project “ (eGEP).<br />

the measurement framework is innovative because:<br />

A. a person in charge for observing each indicator is designated<br />

B. Indicators measure impacts and benefits (and not input / output that the vast<br />

majority was measuring till todat)<br />

C. The Measurement Framework includes Indicators focused on citizens and<br />

businesses.<br />

The Measurement Framework was drawn, on the basis of six (6) axes, which on one side<br />

create the outline of Public Sector’s ‘Administrative Capacity’ and on the other side describe<br />

the basic framework of the State’s modernization. These six (6) axes are:<br />

1. Openness<br />

2. Services to Citizens<br />

3. Services to Businesses<br />

4. Services for Public Administration<br />

5. Human Capital<br />

6. Improvement of Organizational and Technological Architectures<br />

For the creation of the measurement framework for quantification of the GSPA objectives<br />

with regard to eGovernment, principal and secondary indicators were set. In particular,<br />

indicators of A, B and C levels were set:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Α’ Level Indicators: These are complex indicators, few in their numbers and they<br />

usually demonstrate impact/ benefit. For their estimation, B’ level indicators<br />

estimation is required. The A’ level indicators have great significance mainly at<br />

strategic level and have particular ‘political significance’ since their measurement<br />

concerns the general political planning of Public Administration.<br />

Β’ Level Indicators: These indicators are complex in their majority and come from<br />

the estimation of C’ level indicators. Most of them express % and the outcome of<br />

their measurement is particularly useful in the design of Governmental policies.<br />

C’ Level Indicators: These are simple indicators that come directly from the<br />

analysis of primary researches’ results. Most of them express quantity and the<br />

outcome of their measurement is used for the estimation of B’ Level Indicators. On<br />

their own, they are not of strategic importance, therefore for most of them the place<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 29


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

of value-objective is meaningless, but they are the necessary structural elements of<br />

A’ and B’ level indicators.<br />

Η ποσοτικοποίηση των εθνικών στρατηγικών στόχων αναφορικά με το eGovernment και η<br />

μέτρησή τους (μέσω του συστήματος δεικτών) συμβάλει στην ανάπτυξη και παρακολούθηση<br />

της εξέλιξης της Ηλεκτρονικής Διακυβέρνησης στην Ελλάδα, καθώς:<br />

The quantification of the National Strategic Objectives with regard to eGovernment (via the<br />

measurement framework) contributes to the development and observation of eGovernment<br />

evolution in Greece, as:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

It enhances the deficiency areas in Public Administration and contributes to action<br />

design for the acceleration in the development of eGovernment in Greece.<br />

It informs in a overall, cohesive and coherent way all the interested parties-<br />

Authorities<br />

It allows comparisons on eGovernement development issues between Greece and<br />

the other European Countries<br />

It measures the national strategy concerning eGovernment producing results which<br />

are visible in the measurement framework.<br />

The progress of Public Administration is monitored in the sectors related to<br />

eGovernment and its performance is then compared in relation to the financing it<br />

receives for similar actions.<br />

5.5.1 Conclusions<br />

The Measurement Framework which is recommended is actually the first structured attempt<br />

to measure eGovernment Strategic Objectives in Greece. The exigencies of this system for<br />

data concerning the whole of Public Administration are such that require the realisation of<br />

adequate action for their fulfilment. Given the fact that, Public Administration does not dispose<br />

of data collection mechanisms or most of the data available are not updated regularly, action<br />

taking is required in this sector.<br />

Till today, there was no clear view of the development of eGovernment in Greece, the user<br />

acceptance, its effectiveness and quality. The Measurement Framework, besides the<br />

quantification of the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

strategic objectives, covers the absence of a monitoring system observing eGovernment<br />

progress in Greece. It is a systematic effort to create a clear picture regarding eGovernment,<br />

the use of eGovernment services from citizens and businesses, eGovernment contribution to<br />

Governmental policies concerning quality of life, improvement of productivity and<br />

competitiveness of businesses, development of Public Administrations’ Human Resources etc.<br />

5.5.2 Recommendations<br />

For the measurement of indicators, a collection of data is needed, data that today<br />

does not exist (at least as complete as it is required by a measurement framework). This<br />

implies that for the finding of the base values and the monitoring of indicators, in time, at<br />

least the following actions have to be taken:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Measurement of the transaction time and cost between citizens/businesses and Public<br />

Administration, as well as between public Agencies.<br />

Update of Public Administration’s quantified data<br />

Update of Human Resource’s Data<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 30


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

The proposed processes are shown and analysed in chapter 7 of the correspondent<br />

deliverable.<br />

Setting as a Secretariat General Objective the reinforcement of transparency and without<br />

ignoring the effort made in this sector, the certified publication on the Internet of the complete<br />

organizational chart of all Authorities defining duties and communication details for each<br />

public servant is absolutely required (there is a relevant Indicator for the quantification of the<br />

Public Administration & eGovernment Secretariat General Objectives with regard to<br />

eGovernment). Taking a step further, the creation of a personnel catalogue in every Public<br />

Authority is important, defining the employee’s position and a brief duty description.<br />

Lastly, due to the extent of the system, it is recommended its pilot operation in a Sector if<br />

Public Administration<br />

where a) there is a bulk of crucial data available and b) in short time<br />

small- scale actions will be implemented from which data will be collected not available<br />

presently.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 31


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

6 eGovernment Opportunities and Lessons Learned<br />

The Project ”The use of Information and Communication Technologies in the Public<br />

Sector (eGovernment)” tries to chart a quite significant part of infrastructures for<br />

eGovernment development in Greece, which include Back office systems, human capital e-<br />

skills in the Public Sector, availability of Strategic Design. At the same time, it is innovative as<br />

for the first time:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

A study is carried out for skill measurement in information technology within public<br />

sector employees (in depth and precision)<br />

A cohesive and coherent measurement framework system is designed for the<br />

quantification of national secretariat general objectives regarding eGovernment<br />

An attempt to depict the current situation is made concerning the systems and the<br />

applications of Back office in a subgroup of Public Sector Authorities<br />

In order to express the recommendations and the steps to be taken so as to develop<br />

eGovernment in Greece, it is advisable to collect more data, apart from the deliverables<br />

conclusions. Specifically in the next paragraphs, evidence concerning eGovernment<br />

dynamics in Greece are presented according to the SWOT analysis method: strong points are<br />

highlighted, weak points are spotted so as to be improved, opportunities and threats are<br />

assessed.<br />

In conclusion, the recommendations concerning eGovernment in Greece are made after<br />

careful consideration of the data collected during the implementation of the deliverables as<br />

well as the examination of Opinion Leaders views.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 32


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

6.1 SWOT Analysis<br />

In this paragraph, we try to analyse eGovernment impact in Greece by using the SWOT<br />

analysis method (Analysis of Strong points, Weak points, Opportunities and Threats).<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Strong points<br />

Management of the Public Sector ICT<br />

Projects by the same Contracting<br />

Authority<br />

Active participation of “Observatory<br />

for Information Society in Greece” in<br />

the Strategy development regarding<br />

eGovernment<br />

o Existence of Public Sector<br />

executiveswith e-skills and sufficiency<br />

in design and development<br />

eGovernment in Greece<br />

o Political will for eGovernment<br />

development in Greece<br />

Opportunities<br />

o Exploitation of international<br />

experience- there is no need to<br />

reinvent the wheel<br />

o<br />

Exploitation of European Financing in<br />

eGovernment development<br />

o Exploitation of technologically<br />

advanced systems for development<br />

of eGovernment applications<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Weak points<br />

Legislative Framework that has not<br />

been adopted to eGovernment needs<br />

Lack of coordination between Public<br />

Sector Authorities for the<br />

implementation of projects which<br />

follow common strategy<br />

Design of Project not concerning the<br />

Public Administration routine<br />

o Receptive culture to adopt<br />

eGovernment in the Public Sector<br />

o<br />

The necessary skills are not available<br />

among public sector employees<br />

regarding ICT use<br />

Threats<br />

o Long timeplans of eGovernment<br />

projects<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Resistance of the existing system to<br />

the changes brought upon with<br />

eGovernment<br />

development<br />

(Resistance to change)<br />

Implementation of projects based on<br />

pompous plans which do no keep<br />

pace with the existing resources in<br />

skills and infrastructures as well as<br />

with the general culture of Public<br />

Sector Authorities<br />

SWOT Analysis Table<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 33


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

6.2 Useful conclusions drawn from the implementation of complementary<br />

deliverables<br />

Apart from the conclusions and the data occurring after the implementation and conduction<br />

of deliverables, some “lessons learned” derive from them concerning issues not exclusively<br />

related to the core of the project, but to its environment (such as culture, authorities<br />

organization etc.). This information has been fragmentally noted down and is presented in<br />

this unit. It has been proved that:<br />

► The country’s policies have not yet reached the public employees level<br />

One of the basic parameters for successful administration in any kind of Institution (Private of<br />

Public) is objectives diffusion, strategic choices and the Authority’s targeting to the personnel<br />

working within it. They should be aware of the objectives and the common vision. In fact, the<br />

objectives and strategic choices of an Authority or a business involve all the people working<br />

for them and not only <strong>Executive</strong>s. If the personnel within an Authority is not aware of all the<br />

above, then they work in a sterile environment, they do not take part in the effort and a<br />

negative attitude is developed towards any change attempt.<br />

One of the main points observed was the fact that public employees are not aware of their<br />

country’s strategy and the way in which they can take part in its implementation. Specifically,<br />

it was noted that they were ignorant of the “The Operational Programme «Strengthening the<br />

Administrative Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013”, one of the most important texts<br />

of Public Sector strategy. This means, that those that have to work and contribute to the<br />

implementation of the specific Operational Programme have no idea about its content.<br />

► There is no organized records about Back Office systems in Public<br />

Authority Authorities<br />

During the implementation of the project the recording of the progress achieved regarding the<br />

modernization of Public Administration was attempted, in relation to Back Office systems and<br />

applications.<br />

It was noted that there was no systematic and organised recording of the data concerning<br />

Back Office Systems. The recording of data is mainly based on experience and general<br />

knowledge of some executives. In some cases, there were maintenance contracts, system<br />

contracts and application description contracts. Even in these cases, the recording was<br />

neither complete nor updated.<br />

► Each Authority is advancing autonomously<br />

During the implementation of the project it was noticed that every Authority of the Public<br />

Sector constitutes an “islet” of autonomous development in infrastructures and human<br />

resources without a central design and planning<br />

This observation derives from the fact that both Back Office applications and personnel<br />

eSkills vary significantly in terms of quality and completion from one Public Sector Authority to<br />

the other. In no case was there an Authority to submit a plan on which to base its course of<br />

action for development of Back Office systems and training. Consequently, this is the main<br />

reason why authorities are not controlled as to whether or not it has achieved the goals set.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 34


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

► Lack of communication for the acquisition of data from public sector<br />

executives<br />

Lastly, during the implementation of the project, the Contractor came in touch with a number<br />

of executives, for back office recording reasons or the conduction of the study for public<br />

employees’ eSkills. The fact that, in order to arrange an appointment so as to ask for some<br />

information, the communication attempts were more than six, while in most cases<br />

communication was not possible, is typical of the situation.<br />

6.3 Opinion Leaders views<br />

Within the process of recommendation planning for eGovernment Development in Greece, we<br />

came in touch with a series of public and private senior executives who are prominent in the<br />

field of production and implementation of strategic targeting concerning eGovernment<br />

Development in Greece.<br />

Their views are incorporated in the content of the next chapter. In the following paragraphs<br />

there is extensive reference to the general guidelines considered to be the most important<br />

ones in order to achieve the modernization of the Public Sector.<br />

6.3.1 Different eState development speed<br />

Electronic services in Greece are developed at a frantic pace, depending on the executives’<br />

skills in each Authority, their Administration will and in general their environment.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Initiative assumption regarding the convergence of the realised projects is<br />

required aiming to the systematic development of eGovernment services in relation<br />

to infrastructures development.<br />

Careful steps must be made, even if their results are not spectacular, which will<br />

contribute greatly to eGovernment Development in Greece.<br />

6.3.2 Interoperability: the key to success<br />

The main factor of all efforts in eGovernment Development is interoperability of systems and<br />

applications. The development of interoperability level is the milestone for eGovernment. The<br />

system interaction and data exchange, the creation of common databases and in general the<br />

initiatives taken on the interoperability of the systems is the key to the development of<br />

eGovernment services.<br />

6.3.3 Process Re-engineering: With the introduction of new eGovernment<br />

services work procedures change<br />

Systems and application development and services supply is the first of eGovernment<br />

Development features. The second is the change of the traditional work model and its<br />

adaptation to the new demands created by the new attitude in the workplace through the<br />

implementation of eGovernment Services. So, the main prerequisite for the systems to<br />

function after their development is to produce the expected benefits, is to redesign the<br />

procedures and not to attempt to adapt the already existent to a technological environment.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 35


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

6.3.4 Motives: encourage all parties to take part in the effort<br />

Motivation should be given to all interested parties (employees, citizens, businesses) to<br />

assume an active role in the effort to develop eGovernment and not to remain passive<br />

receivers of what is happening.<br />

Such incentives could be: the financing of computer acquisition by the citizens, the disposal of<br />

e-mail accounts, awards to the most friendly-user public services, reduction of the<br />

transactions cost when conducted via eGovernment Services.<br />

6.3.5 High Level Position for IT <strong>Executive</strong>s<br />

Hierarchy in Public Administration suffers the lack of IT <strong>Executive</strong>s in high level positions. The<br />

creation of such positions will attribute a special dynamic in the effort to develop<br />

eGovernment, since in this way political will is going to be supported by technological means.<br />

In parallel, knowledge Kernels could be established in every Authority in order to admit ICT in<br />

Public Sector. A position of a Managing Information Director to every authority, as well as<br />

selective position which will come under the Minister is an example of the drastic changes<br />

that must be made in Public Administration.<br />

6.3.6 eSkills Development of Human Capital<br />

The development of eSkills within the human capital is the single way towards eGovernment<br />

Development in Greece. The combination of motivation, training and the association of<br />

promotion with knowledge will improve Human Capital Skills, which is one of the main factors<br />

of eGovernment development, given the fact that people are the users of the systems and<br />

they can provide citizen and business services.<br />

Private Sector Participation<br />

The incapacity of Public Sector to function in a direct, flexible and prompt way, for the reasons<br />

previously mentioned, poses a number of obstacles in eGovernment Development in Greece.<br />

For this reason, cooperation with private authorities is recommended (in the form of Public-<br />

Private Partnership) for eGovernment Projects implementation. Such projects may concern<br />

the support of data centres which are required for the creation and management of digital<br />

data, the development, management and maintenance of portals etc.<br />

Private Participation will act in the interest of everybody since in this way Public<br />

Administration:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Takes advantage of the accumulated knowledge and the advanced skills available in<br />

the private sector, without having to “reinvent the wheel”<br />

Does not invest in infrastructures, but makes use of infrastructures and means<br />

available in the private sector (and thus avoids maintenance and replacement costs<br />

etc.)<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 36


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7 Proposals – Next Steps for the development of eGovernment in<br />

Greece<br />

Based on the conclusions and proposals of the above paragraphs, an “action map” is shaped<br />

and proposed, related to the development of eGovernment in Greece. This map includes<br />

actions grouped in four categories:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Group 1: Actions Concerning Strategic Convergence and Publicity<br />

Group 2: Actions Concerning Human Resource Development<br />

Group 3: Actions Concerning the Development of Infrastructure that Supports<br />

eGovernment<br />

Group 4: Horizontal (Parallel) Actions<br />

7.1 GROUP 1: Actions Concerning Strategic Convergence and Publicity<br />

The Strategic Convergence of eGovernment actions is a fundamental component of the<br />

development of eGovernment in national level. It is time that actions concerning<br />

eGovernment should follow the National Strategy and not isolated / fragmentary development<br />

choices of eGovernment services by each Body. These actions will empower:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

The diffusions of knowledge, originated by the studies implemented for Public Sector<br />

Τη διαμόρφωση πλαισίου ευθυγράμμισης με την εθνική στρατηγική για την<br />

Ηλεκτρονική Διακυβέρνηση<br />

The introduction of a framework of alignment with the National Strategy about<br />

eGovernment<br />

The actions which are included in Group 1, are analyzed in the following paragraphs.<br />

7.1.1 Action 1: Enactment of Publicity Rules concerning eGovernment Projects<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Enactment of Publicity Rules concerning eGovernment<br />

Projects<br />

Enforcement of transparency and reporting of Public<br />

Administration.<br />

IT <strong>Executive</strong>s working in Public Sector<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

MIPAD (through the new Operational Program which as been form respectively to the 4 th<br />

Programme Period) sets as a main objective the advancement of Openess through the<br />

reinforcement of transparency and reporting within the actions of public authorities, the<br />

promotion of the active participation of citizens and social agreement on the decision of<br />

Public Administration Bodies concerning public interest, on ensuring a fair and equal<br />

treatment of citizen and business from the Public Administration in its range.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 37


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

eGovernment project that are implemented, contributing to the objective of openness.<br />

The results of these project do not concern only the Public Authority that implemented<br />

the project, but the whole community including citizens and its businesses. In order to<br />

succeed on active participation from citizens, it is proposed to introduce and maintain<br />

publicity rules for all eGovernment project (studies or Information Systems development).<br />

Activities that should be included in this action are:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Decision of the Government and notification to the interested Institutions<br />

Introduction and standardization of publicity rules (depending on the type of<br />

project, the budget, breadth of final beneficiaries etc). Appointment of the<br />

Institution (Depository) that will be in charge for the observation of publicity<br />

rules. The Observatory for Information Society is an Organization which<br />

could undertake this role.<br />

7.1.2 Action 2: Formation of Contracts and Studies Repositoty in all Public Sector<br />

Institutions.<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Formation of Contracts and Studies Repository in all<br />

Public Sector Institutions<br />

Enforcement of transparency and reporting of Public<br />

Administration.<br />

IT <strong>Executive</strong>s working in Public Sector<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

In the effort for increase of transparency but also communication of knowledge that is<br />

accumulated in each Institution of Public Sector, the formation of a Repository in each<br />

Institution is proposed, where all eGovernment studies will be gathered, the deliverables<br />

of all projects, as well as the contracts for implementation and support of all Information<br />

Technology (IT) systems.<br />

The repository can be formed without demanding large amount of revenues of Human<br />

Resource (HR) effort. Indicative, it is mentioned that a small amount of time (about 20%<br />

of the working day) of one servant and the usage of a respective application for the<br />

management<br />

of the repository is enough.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 38


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.1.3 Action 3: Formation of Central Repository concerning eGovernment Studies<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Formation of Central Repository concerning<br />

eGovernment Studies<br />

Enforcement of transparency and reporting of Public<br />

Administration.<br />

IT <strong>Executive</strong>s working in Public Sector<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

Additionally to the previous action, is also proposed the formation of a Central<br />

Repository of Studies which are implemented on behalf of Public Sector Bodies. The<br />

action will include:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

The selection of the Institution that will function as Central Repository<br />

Design of processes that are followed between the various<br />

Administration and the Repository<br />

The design of infrastructure needed (Hardware, Software, etc)<br />

The outline of qualifications of executives that will staff the Repository<br />

Bodies of Public<br />

The Observatory for Information Society is an organization which could undertake<br />

the role of Central Repository<br />

7.1.4 Action 4: Delimitation of Public Authority Model Guide<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Delimitation of Public Authority Model Guide<br />

Re-engineering and modernization of Public Administration<br />

<strong>Executive</strong>s of General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

As mentioned in paragraph 6.2, every Ministry is operates and developes autonomously.<br />

This has as a result that we are driven to a Central Public Administration where<br />

Institutions functions with “different speeds”. Apart from the need of harmonization of<br />

IT systems between the Ministries, is also required the adoption of common directions<br />

in various subjects, which are called to face a lot of Institutions simultaneously.<br />

The creation of a Guide about the “Exemplary Ministry” in organizational, operational and<br />

technological<br />

level, will offer a very important tool to Public Administration which will be<br />

used on order to re-organize and modernize Public Sector Institutions. Such a Guide<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 39


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

sho uld include among other:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

basic principle for structuring and the degree of analysis of the flow chart of a<br />

Ministry<br />

Process Description<br />

Job Descriptions<br />

The minimum requirements for ICT infrastructure together with the basic back –<br />

office systems that are required<br />

Topics concerning the way of providing services citizens and businesses<br />

For the creation of the Guide, it is required to exploit the European and International<br />

experience, regarding structures, organization, the degree of process standardization etc.<br />

A similar Guide would have been helpful to be created for other Institutions for example<br />

Hospitals, schools etc.<br />

7.2 GROUP 2: Actions Concerning Human Resource Development<br />

7.2.1 Action 5: Motivation to Human Resources to develop skills for ICT usage<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Motivation to Human Resources to develop skills for ICT<br />

usage<br />

Increase of the percentage of the personnel that uses ICT.<br />

<strong>Executive</strong>s of General Secretariats, Ministry of Interior, Public<br />

Administration and Decentralization (MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), National Center for Public Administration and Local<br />

Government<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

Motivation of Human Resources to develop skills for ICT usage does not stop to the<br />

designing and implementation of training programs. It would be positive if the public<br />

servants would be motivated in order to start using Information Technology (IT) and they<br />

would realize the importance of IT role today, so they would change their attitude<br />

towards IT and use IT in their duties extensively.<br />

In this way they will realize, they will develop and they will maintain the skills that they<br />

have already acquire. Indicative, is proposed the use of official e-mail in their every day<br />

flow of duties for all public servants in Public Sector (for getting<br />

updates, announcements,<br />

requesting days off etc) which will constitute a motive for the use of ICT. In this way<br />

public servants will become “participants” of digital society.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 40


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.2.2 Action 6: Measurement of e-skills and creation of skills profile for Public<br />

Servants<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Measurement of e-skills and creation of skills profile for<br />

Public Servants<br />

Connection of skills and job needs.<br />

<strong>Executive</strong>s of General Secretariats, Ministry of Interior, Public<br />

Administration and Decentralization (MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), National Center for Public Administration and Local<br />

Government<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

The creation of profiles concerning skills means that every servant, depending on his<br />

job and his duties, must have a minimum of certified skills in ICT usage (e-skills). For this<br />

purpose, it is proposed to create profiles, which in conjunction with the survey for the<br />

measurement of servants’ current skills, will bring out the necessary elements for the<br />

design of actions concerning training programs.<br />

It is also mentioned here that e-skills measurement will give data for the corresponding<br />

indicators which are included in the proposed measurement framework (Deliverable P6).<br />

7.2.3 Action 7: Development of Skills (Training) of Human Resources<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Development of Skills (Training) of Human Resources<br />

The continues development of ICT skills of Human Resources<br />

<strong>Executive</strong>s of General Secretariats, Ministry of Interior, Public<br />

Administration and Decentralization (MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), National Center for Public Administration and Local<br />

Government, General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

The development of Public Servants skills through the design and implementation of<br />

appropriate training programs is an important parameter for eGovernment development<br />

in Greece. Training programmas have to be designed in such a way that will cover<br />

completely the needs for skills in the next 3 years. In combination with action 6<br />

(Measurement of e-skills and creation of skills profile for Public Servants) the right<br />

training programs have to be designed the objective of which will be the acquirement of<br />

the right skills from Public Servants in relation with their professional profile. Te above,<br />

have to be implemented is collaboration with the “National Center for Public<br />

Administration and Local Government”, which implements projects that are related with<br />

the actions described in this paragraph.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 41


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.2.4 Action 8: Development of Professional Profile for Information Technology<br />

(IT) Departments<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Development of Professional Profile for Information<br />

Technology (IT) Departments<br />

The continuous development of ICT skills of IT Departments<br />

executives<br />

IT <strong>Executive</strong>s of Ministries and General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), National Center for Public Administration and Local<br />

Government, General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

The development of professional profile of IT departments, is identified with the upgrade<br />

of their role. Training of the personnel, in Project Management, Information Management<br />

etc, as well as the upgrade of the role of IT Departments will contribute to the<br />

improvement and development of their professional profile.<br />

For this purpose interventions are required in legislation, structures and processes of<br />

Public Sector Bodies, as well as the implementation of training programs which can be<br />

placed between the training programs that will be implemented in the framework of<br />

Action 9.<br />

The executives of the Superior structures of Public Sector Bodies, with IT executives is<br />

essential. The enactment of IT executive positions in the superior hierarchy (e.g.<br />

positions directly under the Minister) and the corresponding development of structures in<br />

the hierarchy, will allow to the Political Authority (which is willing to proceed with the<br />

development of eGovernment) to talk in a formal way with Policy Makers which are able<br />

to support eGovernment development.<br />

The enactment of positions which will be staffed by executives of IT Department (e.g.<br />

Chief Information Officer and General IT Manager) will cover the organizational gap that<br />

exist today (participation of executives that have the responsibility to develop IT<br />

infrastructure of Public Sector Bodies) and will assist the development of “digital culture”,<br />

the design and programming of IT projects etc.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 42


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.3 GROUP 3: Actions Concerning the Development of Infrastructure that<br />

Supports eGovernment<br />

7.3.1 Action 9: Five year Plan for the replacement of Proprietary Applications<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Five year Plan for the replacement of Proprietary<br />

Applications<br />

Modernization of Information Systems (IS)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

The development of eGovernment systems demands a cohesive and modern<br />

technological background in all Bodies where systems will interconnect, not only between<br />

them, but also with other external systems. It is well known that the re-engineering of<br />

back-office systems is extremely important not only internaly to Public Sector<br />

Organization (reduction of cost, increase of productivity and flexibility, simplification of<br />

organizational structures, increase of interoperability, improvement of working conditions<br />

in Public Sector) but also in communication with users (decrease of actual presence of<br />

citizens, faster, cheaper and easy to access services, decrease of the number of errors,<br />

increase of transparence and Public Sector openness, increase of development<br />

opportunities). The proposed actions (Action 4: “Delimitation of Public Authority Model<br />

Guide” and Action 11 “Enrichment of Back-office systems with additional modules”) shows<br />

the importance of Information system usage in organizational support of Public Sector<br />

Bodies.<br />

In this action, because of the large number of proprietary applications that still operate<br />

and cover a variety of need in Public Sector Institutions, a number of replacement<br />

activities are proposed in order these applications to be incorporated in Back-office<br />

systems.<br />

In particular, it is proposed that each Body (and especially Ministries) must be obliged to<br />

elaborate a five year plan for the replacement of all proprietary applications.<br />

This action, includes among other:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

complete and analytical recording of all systems operating in each Public Sector<br />

Body<br />

The configuration of alternative proposals for the replacement and incorporation<br />

of proprietary application in back-office systems<br />

The cost and time of replacement<br />

Replacement Actionsof proprietary application<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 43


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.3.2 Action 10: Digital Content Creation<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Digital Content Creation<br />

Improvement of services provided from Public Administrations’<br />

Portals<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

One of the most important problems that Bodies face when they attempt to provide<br />

eGovernment services is the limited amount of digital content which is also of pure<br />

quality. The development of eGovernment demands the existence of digital content which<br />

today does not exist, or it is very limited.<br />

The content of this action is the creation of multilingual content. It is assumed that<br />

content in Greek and English must be published in portals and the translation in other<br />

languages given the special peculiarities of services.<br />

The content which will be created must be also available through the special pages which<br />

are addressed to people with special needs and they are compatible with W3C standard.<br />

The content of Portals is created, is revised and evaluated constantly. All portals should<br />

evaluated in annual basis about their content (is it updated? Is it exhaustive?)<br />

7.3.3 Action 11: Enrichment of Back-office systems with additional modules<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Enrichment of Back-office systems with additional<br />

modules<br />

Modernization of Information Systems<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

Back office systems that are operating today, concern mainly the financial management<br />

of the Institutions, since the specialized applications concern the integration of the day to<br />

day work of public servants. Given the above as a fact, the development of additional<br />

modules supporting eGovernment services. These systems are CRM Systems (Citizen<br />

Relationship Management), HRMS (Human Resource Managmenet) Systems, Workflow<br />

Management (WMS) Systems, Document Management (DMS) Systems etc<br />

The use of CRM Systems allows Public Administration to provide urgent and reliable<br />

services to citizens and businesses, since public servants can use all the relative<br />

information that is needed in order to deal with requests.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 44


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

The use of HRMS systems allows Public Administration Bodies to manage all information<br />

concerning their Human Resources (like compensation, training, promotions etc)<br />

Finally, the use of WMS and DMS Systems, allows the organized, methodological and<br />

efficient search, gathering and distribution of the digital content of the organization.<br />

The action includes the study of the necessity of the development of Back office systems<br />

and the design of the associated projects.<br />

7.3.4 Action 12: Development of Human Resource Management Systems (HRMS)<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Development of Human Resource Management Systems<br />

(HRMS)<br />

Modernization of Information Systems<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

The development and installation of HRMS systems, offers an important tool for the<br />

development and management of Human Resources in Public Sector. HRMS Systems,<br />

beside the management capabilities of the daily routine of Human Resource<br />

(compensation, access control etc) comprises an important tool concerning the<br />

management of development and training of Human Resources (see also actions 5 and<br />

7). The operation of HRMS systems will create the basis for better management of<br />

training programs of public servants, management of skills profiles, objectives etc<br />

7.3.5 Action 13: Development of national user authentication system (eID)<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Development of national user authentication system<br />

(eID)<br />

Improvement of Citizens and Businesses Accessibility to<br />

eGovernment<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), Citizens, Businesses<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

Today, in the framework of eGovernment empowerment, a national user authentication<br />

system is developed The systems will allow the State from the one side and citizens and<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 45


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

businesses from the other to carry out transactions within a secure user authentication<br />

environment.<br />

The development of this system, is not a guarantee for the success of this attempt. The<br />

authentication system is something new in the everyday reconciliation of citizens and<br />

businesses with the State. It demands the creation of a positive climate in order citizens,<br />

businesses and public servants to adopt it.<br />

The promotion of the system (advertisements, training of public servants etc), the<br />

establishment of conditions that promote the usage of the system (e.g. compulsory usage<br />

of the system for transactions between Public Administration Bodies) and also the<br />

continuous support and upgrating of the service will comprise the basic supporting and<br />

adopting pylons.<br />

7.3.6 Action 14: Development of eProcurement System for Local Governments<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Development of eProcurement System for Local<br />

Governments<br />

The reinforcement of transparency in Public Administration<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), Local Governments<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Digital Convergence»<br />

The implementation of the project “Development of the Nationals eProcurement Systems”<br />

bring to completion one of the most important eGovernment projects in Greece. The<br />

implementation of this projects changes “everything” in a very important sector of Public<br />

Administration.<br />

After the implementation of this system, the development of a corresponding system for<br />

Local Governments considered advisable. In this way we will have:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

IT support of the tendering procedures for Local Government targeting to speedup<br />

and simplify the whole procedure.<br />

Support for new practices in Public Sector Procurement (framework agreements,<br />

e-auctions).<br />

The improvement of IT infrastructure of Local Authorities and the adoption of<br />

new technologies and practices.<br />

The creation of an “open” procurement system, accessible from all participants in<br />

the procurement process<br />

The improvement of communication between Local Authorities and suppliers<br />

concerning public procurements.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 46


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.4 GROUP 4: Horizontal (Parallel) Actions<br />

7.4.1 Action 15: Measurement of the Initial Indicators Value of the Measurement<br />

Framework<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Measurement of the Initial Indicators Value of the<br />

Measurement Framework<br />

Reinforcement of the effectiveness of Public Administration<br />

throughout the adoption of a Measurement Framework<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

Calculation of Transaction Time (G2C, G2B, G2G)<br />

This action includes the calculation of transaction time between citizens, businesses Public<br />

Administration Bodies, with other Public Administration Bodies. Ti project will be<br />

implemented for a number of critical transaction which concern services provided to<br />

citizens and businesses and are provided both the electronic and classic way. This action<br />

includes:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Mapping of transactions which will are included in calculations<br />

Calculation of transaction time the service is provided using the classic way<br />

Calculation of transaction time the service is provided using electronic means<br />

Measurement of Quantitative Data concerning Public Administration<br />

This action concerns the recording of quantitative elements which are included in the<br />

measurement framework for the measurement of the national strategic objectives<br />

concerning eGovernment. These elements are:<br />

o<br />

Total value of procurements that are entirely carried out online concerning the entire<br />

Public Sector (Ministries, General Secretariats, Regions, First and Second level of<br />

Local Authorities etc)<br />

o Total Number of Public Administration’s Processes and Number of Public<br />

Administration’s Processes that are fully traceable on the web<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Number of policy drafts and Number of policy drafts online for consultation<br />

Number of Governmental websites providing platform for digital interaction and<br />

consultation (online forum, e-petitioning etc)<br />

Number of public agencies publishing online full organizational chart with indication of<br />

responsibility and contact information for each public servant<br />

Number of Law available online<br />

Number of citizens’ recorded complaints<br />

Total number of<br />

Public Sector’s services for citizens and number of Services which<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 47


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

available online<br />

Number of Public Administration web sites which are compliant with W3C<br />

standard<br />

Number of businesses that use the internet for complete online transactions with<br />

Public Afministration hence saving time<br />

Number of PCs that Public Sector’s Agencies obtained during the last year<br />

Total Number of PCs in Public Sector’s Agencies<br />

Number of Bodies that support the use of Electronic Identification (eID)<br />

Measurement of Human Resource Data<br />

The project concerns the recording of human resource elements which are included in the<br />

measurement framework for the measurement of the national strategic objectives<br />

concerning eGovernment. These elements are:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Total number of public servants<br />

Management <strong>Executive</strong>s/ IT Managers’/ Employees average level of IT skills (See<br />

also action 9)<br />

Number of employees that are trained<br />

Number of Public Servants with access to a personal computer<br />

Number of Public Servants with internet access<br />

Number of Public Servants with a personal electronic mail account (e-mail) from<br />

their Service<br />

7.4.2<br />

Action 16: Set of Target for the entire Public Sector – Roadmap to<br />

eGovernment<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Set of Target for the entire Public Sector – Roadmap to<br />

eGovernment<br />

Support of eGovernment development in Greece<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD), General Secretariats<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

Η δράση αυτή αφορά στη θέση στόχων, προτεραιοτήτων και σχεδιασμό των διαδικασιών<br />

μέσω των οποίων θα υλοποιηθεί η στρατηγική της χώρας για το eGovernment. Στο<br />

σχεδιασμό του Οδικού Χάρτη για το eGovernment συμμετέχουν Ο Λ Ο Ι οι εταίροι<br />

(Δημόσιος Τομέας, αγορ ά πληροφορικής, πολίτες, επιχειρήσεις). Στόχο ς είναι ο<br />

σχεδιασμός των διαδικασιών, η θέση στόχων και η παρακολούθηση της πορεία ανάπτυξης<br />

του eGovernment στην Ελλάδα με κοινή δέσμευση και προσπάθεια. Η δράση<br />

περιλαμβάνει:<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 48


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

This action is about setting objectives and priorities, and designing of processes<br />

throughout which the national strategy for eGovernment will be implemented. In the<br />

process of designing the Roadmap for eGovernment, A L L partners participate (Public<br />

Sector, IT market, citizens, businesses). The aim is to design processes, to set objectives<br />

for following the development process of eGovernment in Greece with mutual agreement<br />

and effort. This action includes:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Organization of design process of the Roadmap<br />

Roadmap creation<br />

Calculation of Roadmap progress (connection with measurement framework)<br />

7.4.3 Action 17: Review of the initial Measurement framework (Version 2)<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Review of the initial Measurement framework (Version<br />

2)<br />

Improvement of measurement methodology of administrative<br />

capacity of public administration and adjustment of the<br />

measurement framework to the constantly changing demands<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

The measurement framework for the quantification of national strategic objective<br />

concerning eGovernment is the first attempt to design a complete measurement<br />

framework about eGovernment in Greece.<br />

Besides the fact that the system is complete, it is certain that after the implementation of<br />

the measurement framework, the necessity for revision will appear both for making<br />

corrective actions and to be adjust to the latest developments in Greek and International<br />

environment (progress of eGovernment Roadmap). The action incorporates:<br />

o Revision of the measurement framework<br />

o Introduction of weights in the measurement process<br />

o Adaption to the demands of following the “eGovernment Roadmap”<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 49


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.4.4 Action 18: Crisis Management and Disaster Recovery Plan<br />

Action Title:<br />

Objective:<br />

Receivers:<br />

Suggested<br />

Implementaton<br />

Bodies:<br />

Financing Source:<br />

<strong>Summary</strong>:<br />

Crisis Management and Disaster Recovery Plan<br />

Modernization of IT infrastructure<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization<br />

(MIPAD)<br />

Operational Programme «Strengthening the Administrative<br />

Capacity of public Administration 2007-2013»<br />

Crisis Management is a relatively new sector of Management. Deals with forcasting<br />

possible crisis (e.g. Hacking on the Information System of a Public Administration Agency)<br />

and the designing of actions to deal with them These action are not limited to the<br />

technical and organizational action plans, but also facing subjects like communication and<br />

public relations.<br />

Respectively, the Disaster Recovery Plan is a complex process which involve all sectors of<br />

Public Administration. Important part is playing the recording of present situation, but<br />

more important is the maintenance of these plans as well as the readiness at any time.<br />

The cost of such a plan is significant, since it includes backup systems, personnel,<br />

telecommunications and inspections in daily basis.<br />

It is obvious that in order someone to claim that Public Administration in Greece offers<br />

eGovernment services of the same level with the services provided by the advanced<br />

countries in eGovernment, must deal seriously with crisis management as well as with the<br />

des ign of disaster recovery of the Public Administrations’ systems. It is desirable that<br />

Public Administration will compose and maintain<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Disaster Rocovery plan (which<br />

will include the study, the implementation of<br />

backup systems, the design of processes etc)<br />

A Crisis Management Guide<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 50


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.5 Hierarchy of Actions<br />

In the graph that follows, the proposed actions which are describes in paragraph 7.2 are<br />

presented in relation with the maturity level and the priorities in implementation.<br />

Figure 2: Hierarchy of Actions<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 51


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.6 Proposal Framework Objectives<br />

The efficient operation of Public Sector and the improvement of financial dimensions which<br />

are secured through the offering and usage of eGovernment, reduces inefficiency of Public<br />

Administration and create the right conditions for development and competitiveness growth.<br />

The speed-up of the development of eGovernment, will correspond to a number of challenges<br />

and claims:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

modernize and establish effective public services<br />

provide better and more secure services to citizens<br />

cover demands from businesses that would like to find less bureaucracy and more<br />

efficiency in Public Sectors’ Agencies<br />

To ensure international continuity of public services, which is necessary in order to<br />

support mobility around Europe<br />

The proposed framework corresponds to the challenges and contributes to the improvement<br />

of sectors like the growth of competitiveness, the increase of GDP, the improvement of the<br />

performance of Greece in international measurements for the improvement of Administrative<br />

Capacity of Public Administration.<br />

7.6.1 Growth of Competitiveness in Greece<br />

Since the Lisbon Strategy set out to make Europe the most competitive and dynamic<br />

economy in the world, competitiveness has become one of the political priorities of the<br />

European Union. National industry needs to be competitive if it is to achieve its economic,<br />

social and environmental goals and thus ensure an improving quality of life for citizens. In its<br />

efforts to promote competitiveness, Greece also seeks to adapt the economy to structural<br />

change, relocation of industrial activity to emerging economies, redeployment of jobs and<br />

resources to new industrial sectors and the risk of a process of deindustrialisation.<br />

National competitiveness is determined by productivity growth and thus depends on the<br />

performance and the future of Greek industry, an especially on its capacity for structural<br />

adjustment. To be competitive, Greece must outperform in terms of research and innovation,<br />

information and communication technologies, entrepreneurship, competition, education and<br />

training.<br />

In order competitiveness to grow, it is essential Greek industry to show demands of the<br />

sector they operate in and the State to reduce the cost and time of time-consuming and<br />

bureaucratic processes.<br />

The development of eGovernment services originate the appropriate environment where<br />

businesses can invest time, cost and resources concerning their core activities, having as a<br />

fact the low cost and the prompt transaction with Public Administration. It is obvious, that the<br />

growth in competitiveness does not require action from the side of businesses only, but also<br />

from the Public Administration which as to become more flexible, has to adopt the legislation<br />

and processes, has to put out obstacles which are placed by bureaucratic processes and also<br />

to provide a clear framework of rules and regulations for the operation of businesses and<br />

finally quality services.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 52


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

7.6.2 Growth of GDP (Gross Domestic Product)<br />

The growth of GDP is achieved directly and indirectly, through the development of<br />

eGovernment for the provision of services to citizens and businesses.<br />

The direct repercussion that eGovernment development has is the growth of GDP which<br />

comes from the increase in investments, the increase in spending for Information Technology<br />

and Communications (ICT), as well as investments in research and development.<br />

The growth of GDP, is achieved through the development of eGovernment. The improvement<br />

of productivity in Public Sector, but also in businesses that deal with Public Administration,<br />

has as a result the growth of GDO (better services, expenditure catbacks etc). The reduction<br />

of administrative obstacles and the provision of better services (basic parameters for the<br />

increase of GDP) are achieved through the increase of productivity, which is feasible through<br />

the re-engineering of Public Administration processes, training and introduction of ICT, which<br />

actually means the development of eGovernment.<br />

7.6.3 Improvement of the performance of Greece in international measurements<br />

The improvement of the performance of Greece in international measurements, is linked with<br />

the development of eGovernment services. Holding NRI as an example, we ding out that<br />

most of the lower level indicators which are uses for the measurement of NRI are affected by<br />

eGovernment progress.<br />

More analytically, NRI indicator is affective (positive or negative) from:<br />

State readiness in ICT. This indicator measures the priority that the State give to the<br />

development of IT for the future, together with digital participation and digital readiness of<br />

the state.<br />

The usage of ICT from the State. This indicator measures the penetration of ICT in Public<br />

Sector through specific parameters (operation of ePtocurement system, deposit of tax etc)<br />

Political and Legislative Framework. This indicator measures the existence of laws which<br />

promote and support ICT (laws concerning e-business, digital signature etc).<br />

It is obvious that the development of eGovernment will improve the impression about Greece<br />

abroad, since as it appears from the above paragraphs, international organization lay weight<br />

to the measurement of progess in the introduction of eGovernment.<br />

7.6.4 Improvement of Administrative Capacity of Public Administration<br />

The development of eGovernment services contribute to the improvement of Administrative<br />

Capacity of Public Administration. According to the results of eGovernment Economics Project<br />

(eGep), eGovenment development leads to the improvement of productivity consequently<br />

contributes to a number of results, one of which is the Improvement of Administrative<br />

Capacity of Public Administration<br />

Besides, it is obvious, tha the introduction of information and communication technologies<br />

improves Administrative Capacity of Public Administration. The access to databases, the<br />

communication through the usage of e-mail, the exchange of documents in the digital way,<br />

the simplification of processes, the increase of transparency in the transactions between<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 53


P7: <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Public Administration and Citizens and businesses are a few examples though which the<br />

above are validated.<br />

First Version<br />

April 2007 54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!