30.11.2014 Views

4 - FIFA/CIES International University Network

4 - FIFA/CIES International University Network

4 - FIFA/CIES International University Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DAN ATKINS<br />

GENERAL MANAGER,<br />

IGNITE MUSIC & ENTERTAINMENT<br />

THE SPORTBUSINESS DEBATE<br />

“The possibility to integrate<br />

graphics and statistics adds a new<br />

dimension. Add the drama of<br />

the lighting and audio effects to<br />

the live event mix and given the<br />

choice, there is no way you would<br />

want to watch at home.”<br />

WITH THE INCREASE of sports events being held<br />

at modern stadiums and in entertainment venues,<br />

such as the O2 Arena in London, long gone are<br />

the days where it is acceptable for the in-stadium<br />

‘screens’ mix to be an afterthought, with lower<br />

production values than one would expect to see<br />

on television.<br />

New technologies have developed alongside<br />

high-definition (HD) television such as super<br />

slow-motion replays and tiny HD mini-cameras<br />

that provide ‘point-of-view’ coverage. These shots<br />

can be used to enhance the audience experience<br />

during breaks in play.<br />

The possibility to integrate graphics and<br />

statistics such as Hawk-Eye and win/loss/<br />

accuracy information also adds a new dimension<br />

for the live event viewer that was previously only<br />

available to the broadcaster. Add the drama of the<br />

lighting and audio effects to the live event mix and<br />

given the choice, there is no way you would want<br />

to watch at home.<br />

At ignite we believe the in-stadium audiovisual<br />

presentation is of paramount importance<br />

to the live audience. At the Barclays ATP World<br />

Tour Finals event (see page 27), we use multicamera<br />

television directors to ‘call’ the screens,<br />

lighting, presenter and music cues, as if it were<br />

a live television show. In order to do this, we<br />

work closely with the Association of Tennis<br />

Professionals and their live broadcast television<br />

director in the lead up to the event.<br />

Having complete integration with the live<br />

broadcast team, sharing control of cameras and<br />

replays, and not working in isolation, it is now<br />

very possible to bring television production values<br />

to the live event audience and allow spectators<br />

to share in aspects of sports coverage that were<br />

previously only seen at home.<br />

“How will HD TV, 3D TV and other<br />

technologies which enhance the<br />

quality of the television sports<br />

experience impact on the live<br />

events sector, and what needs to<br />

be done to ensure that the<br />

in-stadium experience matches<br />

that offered by broadcasters?”<br />

The 2010 <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup marked a significant development in the<br />

evolution of live 3D sports coverage.<br />

And while the broadcast sector learned many lessons about what works<br />

and what doesn’t from a technical perspective, the wider implications of<br />

yet another enhancement to the armchair/couch sports experience are<br />

worthy of discussion.<br />

The media-delivered sports experience has never been richer. That’s not<br />

simply the result of the quality of the pictures but the way broadcasters are<br />

able to tell the story of an event. In just about every respect, the armchair<br />

becomes the best seat in the house. What’s the incentive to pay big money<br />

for tickets, travel and catering when you can relax at home or with friends at<br />

a bar for the fraction of the cost and potential inconvenience?<br />

It is an issue that should be taxing not only for the people who sell tickets<br />

to live events, but also to broadcasters themselves. It can be argued that sport<br />

is a four-dimensional experience and that the fourth dimension is the crowd.<br />

The crowd provides the vibrant colourful background and spontaneous<br />

ever-changing soundtrack to live broadcasts. Try watching with the sound<br />

turned down or, as in the case of the World Cup, the natural sound drowned<br />

out by the buzz of vuvuzelas - and the product becomes poorer.<br />

So if sport needs a crowd, what can be done to ensure that fans will<br />

still pack stadiums when there are other less expensive and more<br />

comfortable options? Is ensuring that stadia remain full an issue of<br />

pricing - once again the <strong>FIFA</strong> World Cup indicates this is an important<br />

factor - or is there more to it than that?<br />

Are we simply burying our heads in the sand if we continue to believe<br />

that the status of the live sport event will remain unchanged during a time<br />

when household budgets are under strain and when there is no shortage of<br />

entertainment opportunities?<br />

That’s the question we put to our panel of experts this month.<br />

80 SportBusiness <strong>International</strong> • No. 160 • 09.10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!