Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Transgender</strong> <strong>EuroStudy</strong>:<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Focus</strong> on the<br />
<strong>Transgender</strong> Experience of Health Care<br />
The <strong>Focus</strong> Groups<br />
Additional data was gathered using focus groups as, given the short time frame for this research<br />
report, it allowed a large amount of data to be collected over a short period of time. This qualitative<br />
detail about participants’ experiences while accessing healthcare adds a more personal dimension to<br />
the quantitative data. Translators from seven countries visited the UK for a training session on<br />
conducting the focus groups. This included how to recruit for the focus groups <strong>and</strong> the sensitivities of<br />
researching people who are part of a vulnerable group. The translators were given a short list of<br />
open–ended questions to use as a guide when conducting the focus groups <strong>and</strong> were asked to write a<br />
short piece about the composition of the focus group in terms of age <strong>and</strong> gender, how they identified<br />
<strong>and</strong> how much trans-related healthcare they had accessed.<br />
Interpretation <strong>and</strong> Analysis<br />
The survey was launched online in early October 2007, the focus groups were conducted in<br />
October <strong>and</strong> the healthcare analysis began in late November. The systems engineer built a programme<br />
which would collate the results across the countries as well as on individual countries. Participants<br />
who had not accessed medical treatment for gender reassignment were screened out – as otherwise<br />
their ‘negative’ answers to questions regarding treatment would affect the statistics.<br />
The ‘Benchmark’ System<br />
We built a code for analysing the statistics using an ‘Acceptable Baseline’ measurement for some<br />
answers. Many questions were multiple choice; some answers were coded as Acceptable Baseline (AB)<br />
responses. For example, with the question below we chose the second answer as AB; this ‘benchmark’<br />
was the minimum or best that trans people should expect when accessing healthcare:<br />
When you first talked to a doctor or psychiatrist about your<br />
transition, how did they respond<br />
Was informative <strong>and</strong> helpful<br />
Wanted to help but lacked information<br />
Did not appear to want to help<br />
Refused to help<br />
Best practice<br />
Acceptable baseline<br />
Not acceptable<br />
Not acceptable