Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Transgender EuroStudy â Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9 April 2008<br />
Recommendations are that:<br />
The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission as guardian of the treaties should ensure that EU directives on<br />
equal treatment of women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>and</strong> gender equality are implemented to include<br />
protection of trans people against discrimination.<br />
<strong>Legal</strong> action based on EU directives needs to be revisited to ensure accessibility for ordinary<br />
people in a manner which is quick <strong>and</strong> at minimum cost, particularly when Member States have<br />
not implemented EU directives. 2<br />
Funding is needed to ensure that trans people throughout <strong>Europe</strong> are made aware of their<br />
rights contained in the EU directives <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an Convention on Human Rights.<br />
States need to provide gender reassignment treatment without excessive restrictions.<br />
Methodology<br />
The analysis for this report focuses on 615 (female to male) trans men, <strong>and</strong> 1349 (male to<br />
female) trans women, who were the survey respondents as of 1 December 2007 after incomplete or<br />
duplicate responses were removed.<br />
In total, the focus group respondents were 12 trans men, 24 trans women <strong>and</strong> one nongendered<br />
person.<br />
We devised an Acceptable Baseline (AB) system for the analysis of survey responses. This was<br />
the bare minimum st<strong>and</strong>ard of treatment that trans people should expect to receive in terms of:<br />
clinical need <strong>and</strong> acceptable treatment of patients by health care professionals. This was then<br />
compared across the experiences of respondents who belonged to different categories:<br />
Respondents who transitioned less than 5 years ago compared with those who transitioned<br />
more than 10 years ago.<br />
Respondents who earned less than €20,000 per year compared with those who earned more<br />
than €50,000 per year.<br />
Respondents who were in skilled occupations compared with those who were in unskilled<br />
occupations.<br />
Clinical Need Met<br />
State funding for hormones<br />
The majority of respondents were refused State funding for hormones – more than 79% consistently<br />
across all the different categories, with a maximum of 5% difference between each group category.<br />
State funding for surgery<br />
More than 82% of respondents of all the categories were refused State funding for the<br />
acceptable baseline surgeries – these were the minimum required for trans people to live in their<br />
acquired gender. There was only a maximum of 6% difference in figures across the group categories.<br />
2<br />
Francovich v Republic<br />
of Italy ECJ (1995) ICR<br />
722, ECJ Cases C-6 <strong>and</strong><br />
9/90 (also reported at<br />
[1992] IRLR 84 <strong>and</strong><br />
[1993] 2 CMLR 66).