24.12.2014 Views

Transgender EuroStudy – Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe

Transgender EuroStudy – Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe

Transgender EuroStudy – Legal Survey and Focus ... - ILGA Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9 April 2008<br />

Recommendations are that:<br />

The <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission as guardian of the treaties should ensure that EU directives on<br />

equal treatment of women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>and</strong> gender equality are implemented to include<br />

protection of trans people against discrimination.<br />

<strong>Legal</strong> action based on EU directives needs to be revisited to ensure accessibility for ordinary<br />

people in a manner which is quick <strong>and</strong> at minimum cost, particularly when Member States have<br />

not implemented EU directives. 2<br />

Funding is needed to ensure that trans people throughout <strong>Europe</strong> are made aware of their<br />

rights contained in the EU directives <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an Convention on Human Rights.<br />

States need to provide gender reassignment treatment without excessive restrictions.<br />

Methodology<br />

The analysis for this report focuses on 615 (female to male) trans men, <strong>and</strong> 1349 (male to<br />

female) trans women, who were the survey respondents as of 1 December 2007 after incomplete or<br />

duplicate responses were removed.<br />

In total, the focus group respondents were 12 trans men, 24 trans women <strong>and</strong> one nongendered<br />

person.<br />

We devised an Acceptable Baseline (AB) system for the analysis of survey responses. This was<br />

the bare minimum st<strong>and</strong>ard of treatment that trans people should expect to receive in terms of:<br />

clinical need <strong>and</strong> acceptable treatment of patients by health care professionals. This was then<br />

compared across the experiences of respondents who belonged to different categories:<br />

Respondents who transitioned less than 5 years ago compared with those who transitioned<br />

more than 10 years ago.<br />

Respondents who earned less than €20,000 per year compared with those who earned more<br />

than €50,000 per year.<br />

Respondents who were in skilled occupations compared with those who were in unskilled<br />

occupations.<br />

Clinical Need Met<br />

State funding for hormones<br />

The majority of respondents were refused State funding for hormones – more than 79% consistently<br />

across all the different categories, with a maximum of 5% difference between each group category.<br />

State funding for surgery<br />

More than 82% of respondents of all the categories were refused State funding for the<br />

acceptable baseline surgeries – these were the minimum required for trans people to live in their<br />

acquired gender. There was only a maximum of 6% difference in figures across the group categories.<br />

2<br />

Francovich v Republic<br />

of Italy ECJ (1995) ICR<br />

722, ECJ Cases C-6 <strong>and</strong><br />

9/90 (also reported at<br />

[1992] IRLR 84 <strong>and</strong><br />

[1993] 2 CMLR 66).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!