29.12.2014 Views

Avocet Mining PLC Prospectus December 2011

Avocet Mining PLC Prospectus December 2011

Avocet Mining PLC Prospectus December 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Avocet</strong> <strong>Mining</strong> <strong>PLC</strong><br />

West African Projects<br />

Five block models were constructed, one for each mineralized deposit. The size of parent blocks<br />

were based on half the typical drill spacing, with sub‐blocks used to ensure the block model honored<br />

the mineralized zone geometries. For the north – south striking deposits (Inata North, Central, South<br />

and Sayouba) the models were constructed using a parent cell size of 10m x 25m x 5m (X x Y x Z)<br />

with sub‐cells down to 2.0m x 5m x 1.0m to model the steeply dipping narrow lenses. Minfo East<br />

used a parent cell size of 25m x 10m x 5m (X x Y x Z), reflecting the east‐west strike of this<br />

mineralisation.<br />

Search neighbourhood parameters were evaluated for each deposit, with varying search radii. The<br />

maximum number of samples used was 48, and an octant based search was applied. Cells were<br />

discretized to 2 x 5 x 5.<br />

Block grades were estimated using ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting squared<br />

(IDS) interpolation methods. The results of the grade estimation were validated by means of visual<br />

comparison along sections, statistical analysis, and trend plots comparing the estimated block grades<br />

and the drill hole sampling grades. The IDS estimation was also found to correlate well to the OK<br />

estimation method.<br />

The Mineral Resource estimates were classified according to JORC reporting guidelines. Geological<br />

and grade continuity were assessed per deposit. Inata North and Inata Central are currently being<br />

mined, and geological observations via mapping and mining reconciliation influenced the final<br />

classification for these deposits. QA/QC data from drill samples and density data were reviewed and<br />

were also considered during final classification. The classification boundaries from the 2010 Mineral<br />

Resource models were loaded as a starting point, with the aim being to either retain the boundary<br />

locations, or shift Indicated regions into Inferred, and Measured into Indicated. Perimeter strings<br />

were digitised along a nominated easting or northing (Minfo East) outlining Measured, Indicated and<br />

Inferred regions. The base of Indicated is nominally between 25m and 50m below the deepest drill<br />

intercepts.<br />

The Mineral Resource has been reported above a lower cut‐off of 0.5g/t gold (Table 18), and has<br />

been depleted by topography, which represents the mining open pit surface as of 30 th June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Report No: R253.<strong>2011</strong> 51<br />

268

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!