29.12.2014 Views

Byron Flora and Fauna Study 1999 - Byron Shire Council

Byron Flora and Fauna Study 1999 - Byron Shire Council

Byron Flora and Fauna Study 1999 - Byron Shire Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A GREENPRINT FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE<br />

Terrestrial vertebrates were considered to include aquatic, estuarine <strong>and</strong> ocean shore species but not those<br />

which are predominantly marine.<br />

From this information, a list was derived of species included in Schedules 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 of the TSC Act, 1995<br />

known to occur in the <strong>Shire</strong>. A detailed database was then developed - the <strong>Byron</strong> <strong>Shire</strong> Threatened <strong>Fauna</strong><br />

Database, to include records of Threatened species from all l<strong>and</strong> tenures within the <strong>Shire</strong> with the exception<br />

of public reserved l<strong>and</strong> or National Parks, Nature Reserves <strong>and</strong> State Forests. Records were limited to the<br />

period 1970 to the present to maintain relevance <strong>and</strong> only those for which a date <strong>and</strong> AMG co-ordinates (to<br />

the nearest 100 m) were available were included. Additional information collected for each record was a<br />

description of the location, the observer/recorder <strong>and</strong> source (whether published or unpublished). The<br />

references <strong>and</strong> other sources of information used to compile the database are given in Appendix 8.<br />

All records entered in the database were checked for accuracy, either by referring to original documented<br />

material or contacting the observer. Records were not included if the observer was equivocal about<br />

identification, if the record could not be dated to the year or if AMG co-ordinates could not be assigned to<br />

an accuracy to 100 m.<br />

Records not in documented form were solicited by a direct approach to known local observers, including<br />

amateurs, students <strong>and</strong> professionals, <strong>and</strong> by public advertisement of a request for records <strong>and</strong> then circulation<br />

of a questionnaire. A copy of the questionnaire is included as Appendix 6.<br />

6.2.2 Field surveys<br />

The collation of existing information showed that a relatively extensive amount of location data was available<br />

for some Threatened species as the result of past systematic surveys <strong>and</strong> from the data sets of a number of<br />

resident observers. Examples of such species with location sources were:<br />

76<br />

• Wallum Froglet – Australian Museum Business Services 1995, Fanning 1994, Greenloaning<br />

Biostudies 1997, Milledge 1991, NPWS 1995, Parker 1994;<br />

• Osprey – Australian Museum Business Services 1995, Milledge 1991, NSW NPWS 1995; D.<br />

Milledge, D. Stewart unpubl. data;<br />

• Bush-hen Amaurornis olivaceus – Biosis Research 1990, Milledge 1991, Milledge et al. 1995,<br />

NSW NPWS 1995, Parker 1993c; H. Bower, D. Milledge, D. Stewart, unpubl. data;<br />

• Wompoo Fruit-dove – Biosis Research 1990, Milledge 1991, Murray <strong>and</strong> Baverstock 1991; M.<br />

Fitzgerald, D. Milledge, D. Stewart unpubl. data;<br />

• Rose-crowned Fruit-dove – Ptilinopus regina – Biosis Research 1990, Gilmore et al. 1986,<br />

Milledge 1991, Milledge et al. 1995, Murray <strong>and</strong> Baverstock 1991; H. Bower, D. Milledge, D.<br />

Stewart unpubl. data;<br />

• White-eared Monarch – Biosis Research 1990, Gilmore et al. 1986, Greenloaning Biostudies<br />

1997, Milledge 1991, Milledge et al. 1995, Murray <strong>and</strong> Baverstock 1991; H. Bower, D. Milledge,<br />

D. Stewart, unpubl. data;<br />

• Common Planigale – Australian Museum Business Services 1995, Baker <strong>and</strong> Miller 1998,<br />

Biosis Research 1990, Milledge 1991, Murray <strong>and</strong> Baverstock 1991, Parker 1996b;<br />

• Koala Phascolarctos cinereus – Biosis Research 1990, Gilmore et al. 1986, Milledge <strong>and</strong> McKinley<br />

1992, Phillips 1995; H. Bower, M. Fitzgerald, D. Milledge unpubl. data;<br />

• Common Blossom-bat – Australian Museum Business Services 1995, Biosis Research 1990,<br />

Fanning 1994, Gilmore et al. 1986, Greenloaning Biostudies 1997, Milledge 1991, Milledge<br />

<strong>and</strong> McKinley 1992, Milledge et al. 1995, Murray <strong>and</strong> Baverstock 1991, NSW NPWS 1995; M.<br />

Fitzgerald, D. Milledge unpubl. data.<br />

Consequently, it was decided that field investigations should target the most poorly known Threatened<br />

species in the <strong>Shire</strong> rather than attempting a more general Threatened species survey. Concentration on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!