09.11.2012 Views

Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum

Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum

Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IAS 36 – Impairment of assets<br />

Under GAAP used for the preparation of the 2004 fi nancial<br />

statements, <strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> has based their impairment testing<br />

on a country by country cost pool basis under the full cost method<br />

of accounting.<br />

In accordance with IAS 36 impairment testing is carried out on<br />

a fi eld by fi eld basis. The recoverable amount is the higher of an<br />

assets’ fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Exploration costs<br />

can no longer be carried as capitalised costs within a cost pool<br />

unless the capitalised costs can be supported by future cash fl ows<br />

from that cost pool. If there is no decision to continue with a fi eld<br />

specifi c exploration programme then the costs will be expensed at<br />

the time the decision is made.<br />

<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> has incurred exploration costs in France and<br />

Indonesia which under the adoption of IFRS have been expensed<br />

in the fi nancial statements for 2004.<br />

The eff ect on shareholders’ equity amounted to MSEK -16.1 net<br />

of deferred tax at 1 January 2004 and the impact on the result for<br />

the year ended 31 December 2004 amounted to MSEK -19.4 net of<br />

deferred tax.<br />

IAS 32 and 39 – Derivative fi nancial instruments<br />

IAS 32 and 39 deal with the recognition, measurement, disclosure<br />

and presentation of fi nancial instruments. In accordance with<br />

IAS 39 all derivative instruments are initially recognised at fair<br />

value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are remeasured<br />

at their fair value at each reporting date. The method<br />

of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether or<br />

not the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument. The<br />

<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> Groups’ foreign exchange forward contracts are<br />

example of derivatives that do no qualify for hedge accounting.<br />

<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> had in place in 2004 and <strong>2005</strong> cash fl ow hedges<br />

by means of interest rate hedging contracts and oil price hedging<br />

contracts. Under Swedish GAAP, <strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> had treated the<br />

hedging contracts as off -balance sheet instruments, whereas IFRS<br />

requires these contracts to be recorded in the fi nancial statements<br />

valuing these contracts at fair value. The impact on the opening<br />

balance of the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity at 1<br />

January <strong>2005</strong> amounted to MSEK -98.2 net of deferred tax. The<br />

fi nancial fi xed assets increased with MSEK 64.5 mainly due to the<br />

related deferred tax assets, the current receivables increased with<br />

MSEK 1.9 relating to a short term hedge asset and the current<br />

liabilities increased with MSEK 162.3 in connection to short term<br />

hedge liabilities.<br />

IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources<br />

This standard became eff ective at 1 January 2006. The group has<br />

elected to early adopt this Standard in <strong>2005</strong>, with no eff ect on<br />

the net result or shareholders’ equity. IFRS 6 permits an entity to<br />

develop an accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets<br />

without specifi cally considering the requirements of paragraphs<br />

11 and 12 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting<br />

Estimates and Errors. Thus, an entity adopting IFRS 6 may continue<br />

> 51 <<br />

to use the accounting policies applied immediately before<br />

adopting the IFRS. This includes continuing to use recognition and<br />

measurement practices that are part of those accounting policies.<br />

IFRS 6 also sets the disclosure demands on the assets, liabilities,<br />

income and expenses arising from the exploration and evaluation<br />

of mineral resources.<br />

Reconciliation from Swedish GAAP to IFRS<br />

Group<br />

Net result in TSEK<br />

2004<br />

Parent Company<br />

2004<br />

Net result under Swedish GAAP 620,154 -17,961<br />

Reclassifi cation of minority<br />

interest 7,013 –<br />

Share based payments<br />

Eff ects of changes in functional<br />

-10,712 -10,712<br />

currency 8,230 –<br />

Impairment of assets -22,359 –<br />

Taxes 2,932 –<br />

Net result under IFRS 605,258 -28,673<br />

Group equity in TSEK<br />

Total equity under<br />

Swedish GAAP<br />

1 Jan<br />

2004<br />

31 Dec<br />

2004<br />

1 Jan<br />

<strong>2005</strong><br />

1,841,195 2,407,375 2,407,375<br />

Reclassifi cation of<br />

minority interest<br />

20,036 2,931 2,931<br />

Change in functional<br />

currency<br />

-11,547 -4,610 -4,610<br />

Impairment of assets -16,057 -35,483 -35,483<br />

Adjustment for fi nancial<br />

instruments<br />

– – -98,194<br />

Total equity under IFRS 1,833,627 2,370,213 2,272,019<br />

Parent Company equity<br />

in TSEK<br />

Total equity under<br />

Swedish GAAP<br />

1 Jan<br />

2004<br />

31 Dec<br />

2004<br />

1 Jan<br />

<strong>2005</strong><br />

810,665 808,739 808,739<br />

Reclassifi cation of<br />

minority interest<br />

– – –<br />

Change in functional<br />

currency<br />

– – –<br />

Impairment of assets – – –<br />

Adjustment for fi nancial<br />

instruments<br />

– – –<br />

Total equity under IFRS 810,665 808,739 808,739

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!