Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum
Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum
Annual Report 2005 (6 MB) - Lundin Petroleum
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IAS 36 – Impairment of assets<br />
Under GAAP used for the preparation of the 2004 fi nancial<br />
statements, <strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> has based their impairment testing<br />
on a country by country cost pool basis under the full cost method<br />
of accounting.<br />
In accordance with IAS 36 impairment testing is carried out on<br />
a fi eld by fi eld basis. The recoverable amount is the higher of an<br />
assets’ fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Exploration costs<br />
can no longer be carried as capitalised costs within a cost pool<br />
unless the capitalised costs can be supported by future cash fl ows<br />
from that cost pool. If there is no decision to continue with a fi eld<br />
specifi c exploration programme then the costs will be expensed at<br />
the time the decision is made.<br />
<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> has incurred exploration costs in France and<br />
Indonesia which under the adoption of IFRS have been expensed<br />
in the fi nancial statements for 2004.<br />
The eff ect on shareholders’ equity amounted to MSEK -16.1 net<br />
of deferred tax at 1 January 2004 and the impact on the result for<br />
the year ended 31 December 2004 amounted to MSEK -19.4 net of<br />
deferred tax.<br />
IAS 32 and 39 – Derivative fi nancial instruments<br />
IAS 32 and 39 deal with the recognition, measurement, disclosure<br />
and presentation of fi nancial instruments. In accordance with<br />
IAS 39 all derivative instruments are initially recognised at fair<br />
value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are remeasured<br />
at their fair value at each reporting date. The method<br />
of recognising the resulting gain or loss depends on whether or<br />
not the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument. The<br />
<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> Groups’ foreign exchange forward contracts are<br />
example of derivatives that do no qualify for hedge accounting.<br />
<strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> had in place in 2004 and <strong>2005</strong> cash fl ow hedges<br />
by means of interest rate hedging contracts and oil price hedging<br />
contracts. Under Swedish GAAP, <strong>Lundin</strong> <strong>Petroleum</strong> had treated the<br />
hedging contracts as off -balance sheet instruments, whereas IFRS<br />
requires these contracts to be recorded in the fi nancial statements<br />
valuing these contracts at fair value. The impact on the opening<br />
balance of the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity at 1<br />
January <strong>2005</strong> amounted to MSEK -98.2 net of deferred tax. The<br />
fi nancial fi xed assets increased with MSEK 64.5 mainly due to the<br />
related deferred tax assets, the current receivables increased with<br />
MSEK 1.9 relating to a short term hedge asset and the current<br />
liabilities increased with MSEK 162.3 in connection to short term<br />
hedge liabilities.<br />
IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources<br />
This standard became eff ective at 1 January 2006. The group has<br />
elected to early adopt this Standard in <strong>2005</strong>, with no eff ect on<br />
the net result or shareholders’ equity. IFRS 6 permits an entity to<br />
develop an accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets<br />
without specifi cally considering the requirements of paragraphs<br />
11 and 12 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting<br />
Estimates and Errors. Thus, an entity adopting IFRS 6 may continue<br />
> 51 <<br />
to use the accounting policies applied immediately before<br />
adopting the IFRS. This includes continuing to use recognition and<br />
measurement practices that are part of those accounting policies.<br />
IFRS 6 also sets the disclosure demands on the assets, liabilities,<br />
income and expenses arising from the exploration and evaluation<br />
of mineral resources.<br />
Reconciliation from Swedish GAAP to IFRS<br />
Group<br />
Net result in TSEK<br />
2004<br />
Parent Company<br />
2004<br />
Net result under Swedish GAAP 620,154 -17,961<br />
Reclassifi cation of minority<br />
interest 7,013 –<br />
Share based payments<br />
Eff ects of changes in functional<br />
-10,712 -10,712<br />
currency 8,230 –<br />
Impairment of assets -22,359 –<br />
Taxes 2,932 –<br />
Net result under IFRS 605,258 -28,673<br />
Group equity in TSEK<br />
Total equity under<br />
Swedish GAAP<br />
1 Jan<br />
2004<br />
31 Dec<br />
2004<br />
1 Jan<br />
<strong>2005</strong><br />
1,841,195 2,407,375 2,407,375<br />
Reclassifi cation of<br />
minority interest<br />
20,036 2,931 2,931<br />
Change in functional<br />
currency<br />
-11,547 -4,610 -4,610<br />
Impairment of assets -16,057 -35,483 -35,483<br />
Adjustment for fi nancial<br />
instruments<br />
– – -98,194<br />
Total equity under IFRS 1,833,627 2,370,213 2,272,019<br />
Parent Company equity<br />
in TSEK<br />
Total equity under<br />
Swedish GAAP<br />
1 Jan<br />
2004<br />
31 Dec<br />
2004<br />
1 Jan<br />
<strong>2005</strong><br />
810,665 808,739 808,739<br />
Reclassifi cation of<br />
minority interest<br />
– – –<br />
Change in functional<br />
currency<br />
– – –<br />
Impairment of assets – – –<br />
Adjustment for fi nancial<br />
instruments<br />
– – –<br />
Total equity under IFRS 810,665 808,739 808,739