30.12.2014 Views

evidentiary appendix in support of plaintiffs' partial motion for ...

evidentiary appendix in support of plaintiffs' partial motion for ...

evidentiary appendix in support of plaintiffs' partial motion for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Us<strong>in</strong>g the short-list <strong>of</strong> airport component alternatives, a series <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated airport facility concepts will be developed. 114<br />

On July 12, 1991, Chicago advertised a Request <strong>for</strong> Proposal (RFQ) <strong>for</strong> the Landside and<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>al components <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan Update (ALP Update). The RFQ described the<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>al Master Plan and O’Hare Development Program (ODP-I) and asked <strong>for</strong> a<br />

consultant proposal to prepare a twenty-year development program.<br />

In 1982, the O’Hare Master Plan was adopted and was<br />

implemented as the O’Hare Development Program or ODP. The<br />

master plan provided a schedule <strong>for</strong> airport expansion <strong>for</strong> the<br />

period from 1982-1995. Ground was broken on the first project <strong>in</strong><br />

August 1982. As <strong>of</strong> December 1989 the ODP was 90% complete<br />

<strong>for</strong> design and 85% <strong>for</strong> construction. 115<br />

***<br />

Chicago’s Request For Proposal (RFQ) directed the bidd<strong>in</strong>g contractor to:<br />

Prepare a development program that identifies all capital<br />

improvement projects expected to occur with<strong>in</strong> the 20-year<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g time frame. The development program should be<br />

divided <strong>in</strong>to three development phases: 1995-2000, 2000-2005,<br />

2005-2015. 116<br />

H. The Chronological Development <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan Update (a/k/a ALP Update).<br />

The best way to understand the development <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan Update (a/k/a ALP<br />

Update) is to exam<strong>in</strong>e that development <strong>in</strong> chronological sequence:<br />

1. 1991 Work on the Master Plan Update (a/k/a ALP Update).<br />

While several important steps were taken toward <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> the Master Plan Update <strong>in</strong><br />

1991, an actual start <strong>of</strong> the O’Hare Master Plan did not beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>for</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> reasons, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the fact that much <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Aviation’s and Landrum & Brown’s resources were<br />

focused on Lake Calumet.<br />

114 Exhibit C 49 (emphasis added).<br />

115 Exhibit C 37 (emphasis added).<br />

116 Id. (emphasis added).<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!