31.12.2014 Views

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1987 land use conditions to 822 AFY with 2002 land uses. This loss of recharge is offset<br />

somewhat by increased return flows of imported water used for landscaping irrigation.<br />

Conversion of irrigated cropland to urban uses has been limited in recent years.<br />

If such conversion occurs, the impact on the water balance would involve loss of rainfall<br />

recharge, which might be offset in part by decreased pumping for agricultural irrigation<br />

and return flows of water imported for landscaping.<br />

Previous Work<br />

Water balances were evaluated previously for the <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> <strong>Creek</strong><br />

groundwater basin by Geoconsultants (June 1987 and August 1991). The<br />

Geoconsultants’ water balances are similar to the water balance in this study in two<br />

major respects:<br />

• The study areas are similarly defined; while the Geoconsultants area includes<br />

1,720 acres, the study area in this report includes 1,765 acres.<br />

• The total recharge or inflow values are comparable. Geoconsultants<br />

estimated total recharge at 2,719 AFY (1987) and 2,261 AFY (1991), while<br />

this report provides an estimate of 2,200 AFY.<br />

The water balances differ in overall methodology. Geoconsultants focused on<br />

evaluation of two major sources of recharge, rainfall recharge and runoff recharge. This<br />

study includes independent evaluation of all major inflow and outflow components and<br />

change in storage.<br />

Both studies include evaluation of rainfall recharge, taking into account rainfall,<br />

soil moisture holding capacity, ET, and land use. While the values and computations<br />

differ, the conceptual approach taken by Geoconsultants and this report is similar. In<br />

addition, the rainfall recharge results are similar for the Geoconsultants’ 1987 study (871<br />

AFY) and this report (822 AFY). Geoconsultants’ 1991 study, addressing drought<br />

conditions, estimated rainfall recharge at 599 AFY.<br />

Geoconsultants estimated runoff recharge as 15 percent of runoff, resulting in<br />

estimates of 1,848 AFY (1987) and 1,662 AFY (1991). This study estimates stream<br />

recharge conservatively at 723 AFY.<br />

In considering perennial yield, Geoconsultants offers two approaches. One is to<br />

use one-third of the storage capacity in one year and the second is to use two-thirds of<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!