31.12.2014 Views

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for recent years and for prior years What are the reasons for the difference, if<br />

any, in the estimates What changes in total annual withdrawals have occurred<br />

in the last ten years What changes in total annual withdrawals by current well<br />

owners (other than the District) are anticipated in the next 10 years<br />

The most important groundwater pumping in the basin is the Ocean Colony Partners<br />

Balboa wellfield, which provides irrigation water for two golf courses south of the basin.<br />

This groundwater pumping and export is 347 AFY. <strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping and<br />

consumption within the basin is estimated at 163 AFY. The latter value accounts for<br />

return flows to the basin. No previous estimates of total pumping are known.<br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping amounts have changed little over the past years. While pumping<br />

for landscaping has increased since the mid-1980s, pumping for crops in the<br />

groundwater basin has declined. There are no known plans to increase golf course<br />

pumping. For more information, see Hydrogeologic Setting, <strong>Groundwater</strong> Development<br />

and Wells, and <strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance.<br />

4. What is the estimated total annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />

available from the entire groundwater basin on a safe yield basis to the District<br />

during normal precipitation periods and during drought periods Can these same<br />

total amounts of groundwater be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year,<br />

rather than evenly throughout a 12-month period Can the average annual rate<br />

of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or 100% for a short period<br />

of time<br />

The estimated total annual perennial yield (safe yield) of the <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong><br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> of 1,300 AFY takes into account long-term existing pumping<br />

including agriculture and pumping from the Balboa wellfield for one golf course.<br />

Relatively recent increases in pumping from the Balboa wellfield for a second golf course<br />

(140 AFY) should be included in the 1,300 AFY. The remainder, 1,160 AFY, is sufficient<br />

for the potential <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield and additional development by CCWD.<br />

Maximization of overall yield from the wellfield would involve seasonal operation with<br />

greatest withdrawal during the winter and spring. Summer and autumn pumping will be<br />

limited by lower groundwater levels and recommended operating criteria that avoid<br />

dewatering of the aquifer and exposure of well screens. For more information, see<br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance, Perennial Yield, and <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Test<br />

Well Analysis, Wellfield Operation and Life Expectancy.<br />

5. What is the total estimated annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />

available on a safe yield basis from the District’s five existing test on a safe yield<br />

basis during both normal precipitation periods and drought periods Can these<br />

same annual total amounts be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year Can<br />

the average annual rate of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or<br />

100% for a short period of time such as five days to meet customer demands<br />

during a hot weather period<br />

The estimated total yield of the five wells of the proposed <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield<br />

ranges between 129 and 259 MGY for drought and normal years. For costing purposes,<br />

an average value of 194 MGY (595 AFY) is assumed. This total yield assumes seasonal<br />

variation in pumping, with greater pumping during the winter and spring. Pumping rates<br />

are limited by groundwater levels relative to the elevations of the top of the aquifer and<br />

ES-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!