31.12.2014 Views

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for recent years and for prior years What are the reasons for the difference, if<br />

any, in the estimates What changes in total annual withdrawals have occurred<br />

in the last ten years What changes in total annual withdrawals by current well<br />

owners (other than the District) are anticipated in the next 10 years<br />

The most important groundwater pumping in the basin is the Ocean Colony Partners<br />

Balboa wellfield, which provides irrigation water for two golf courses south of the basin.<br />

This groundwater pumping and export is 347 AFY. <strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping and<br />

consumption within the basin is estimated at 163 AFY. The latter value accounts for<br />

return flows to the basin. No previous estimates of total pumping are known.<br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping amounts have changed little over the past years. While pumping<br />

for landscaping has increased since the mid-1980s, pumping for crops in the<br />

groundwater basin has declined. There are no known plans to increase golf course<br />

pumping. For more information, see Hydrogeologic Setting, <strong>Groundwater</strong> Development<br />

and Wells, and <strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance.<br />

4. What is the estimated total annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />

available from the entire groundwater basin on a safe yield basis to the District<br />

during normal precipitation periods and during drought periods Can these same<br />

total amounts of groundwater be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year,<br />

rather than evenly throughout a 12-month period Can the average annual rate<br />

of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or 100% for a short period<br />

of time<br />

The estimated total annual perennial yield (safe yield) of the <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong><br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> of 1,300 AFY takes into account long-term existing pumping<br />

including agriculture and pumping from the Balboa wellfield for one golf course.<br />

Relatively recent increases in pumping from the Balboa wellfield for a second golf course<br />

(140 AFY) should be included in the 1,300 AFY. The remainder, 1,160 AFY, is sufficient<br />

for the potential <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield and additional development by CCWD.<br />

Maximization of overall yield from the wellfield would involve seasonal operation with<br />

greatest withdrawal during the winter and spring. Summer and autumn pumping will be<br />

limited by lower groundwater levels and recommended operating criteria that avoid<br />

dewatering of the aquifer and exposure of well screens. For more information, see<br />

<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance, Perennial Yield, and <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Test<br />

Well Analysis, Wellfield Operation and Life Expectancy.<br />

5. What is the total estimated annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />

available on a safe yield basis from the District’s five existing test on a safe yield<br />

basis during both normal precipitation periods and drought periods Can these<br />

same annual total amounts be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year Can<br />

the average annual rate of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or<br />

100% for a short period of time such as five days to meet customer demands<br />

during a hot weather period<br />

The estimated total yield of the five wells of the proposed <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield<br />

ranges between 129 and 259 MGY for drought and normal years. For costing purposes,<br />

an average value of 194 MGY (595 AFY) is assumed. This total yield assumes seasonal<br />

variation in pumping, with greater pumping during the winter and spring. Pumping rates<br />

are limited by groundwater levels relative to the elevations of the top of the aquifer and<br />

ES-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!