Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...
Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...
Lower Pilarcitos Creek Groundwater Basin Study - Coastside ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
for recent years and for prior years What are the reasons for the difference, if<br />
any, in the estimates What changes in total annual withdrawals have occurred<br />
in the last ten years What changes in total annual withdrawals by current well<br />
owners (other than the District) are anticipated in the next 10 years<br />
The most important groundwater pumping in the basin is the Ocean Colony Partners<br />
Balboa wellfield, which provides irrigation water for two golf courses south of the basin.<br />
This groundwater pumping and export is 347 AFY. <strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping and<br />
consumption within the basin is estimated at 163 AFY. The latter value accounts for<br />
return flows to the basin. No previous estimates of total pumping are known.<br />
<strong>Groundwater</strong> pumping amounts have changed little over the past years. While pumping<br />
for landscaping has increased since the mid-1980s, pumping for crops in the<br />
groundwater basin has declined. There are no known plans to increase golf course<br />
pumping. For more information, see Hydrogeologic Setting, <strong>Groundwater</strong> Development<br />
and Wells, and <strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance.<br />
4. What is the estimated total annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />
available from the entire groundwater basin on a safe yield basis to the District<br />
during normal precipitation periods and during drought periods Can these same<br />
total amounts of groundwater be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year,<br />
rather than evenly throughout a 12-month period Can the average annual rate<br />
of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or 100% for a short period<br />
of time<br />
The estimated total annual perennial yield (safe yield) of the <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong><br />
<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> of 1,300 AFY takes into account long-term existing pumping<br />
including agriculture and pumping from the Balboa wellfield for one golf course.<br />
Relatively recent increases in pumping from the Balboa wellfield for a second golf course<br />
(140 AFY) should be included in the 1,300 AFY. The remainder, 1,160 AFY, is sufficient<br />
for the potential <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield and additional development by CCWD.<br />
Maximization of overall yield from the wellfield would involve seasonal operation with<br />
greatest withdrawal during the winter and spring. Summer and autumn pumping will be<br />
limited by lower groundwater levels and recommended operating criteria that avoid<br />
dewatering of the aquifer and exposure of well screens. For more information, see<br />
<strong>Groundwater</strong> <strong>Basin</strong> Water Balance, Perennial Yield, and <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Test<br />
Well Analysis, Wellfield Operation and Life Expectancy.<br />
5. What is the total estimated annual amount of groundwater currently potentially<br />
available on a safe yield basis from the District’s five existing test on a safe yield<br />
basis during both normal precipitation periods and drought periods Can these<br />
same annual total amounts be safely withdrawn during a portion of the year Can<br />
the average annual rate of withdrawal be safely increased by a factor of 50% or<br />
100% for a short period of time such as five days to meet customer demands<br />
during a hot weather period<br />
The estimated total yield of the five wells of the proposed <strong>Lower</strong> <strong>Pilarcitos</strong> wellfield<br />
ranges between 129 and 259 MGY for drought and normal years. For costing purposes,<br />
an average value of 194 MGY (595 AFY) is assumed. This total yield assumes seasonal<br />
variation in pumping, with greater pumping during the winter and spring. Pumping rates<br />
are limited by groundwater levels relative to the elevations of the top of the aquifer and<br />
ES-4