02.01.2015 Views

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW

Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

company. However, we expect only a small probability <strong>of</strong> building <strong>of</strong> world companies<br />

branch stores, because steel companies have tendencies to expand into Asian countries, China<br />

or South American countries. There are barriers for entry <strong>of</strong> new competitors on the market;<br />

because <strong>of</strong> it the threat <strong>of</strong> entry <strong>of</strong> a new steel company on the market is slight. The entry <strong>of</strong><br />

new business into the branch is very demanding for capital, equipment, etc. Established<br />

companies use effect <strong>of</strong> learning process, experience, scale, what brings reduction <strong>of</strong> costs;<br />

they have established distribution channels, own distribution companies, what brings increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> barriers for the entry on the market.<br />

C. Pressure <strong>of</strong> substitutes<br />

Pipes from other material can be a potential substitute for steel pipes. Steel pipes are<br />

extruded by plastic pipes in the gas industry; for medium and low pressure distribution.<br />

Another possibility <strong>of</strong> modification <strong>of</strong> steel pipes is stainless pipes, aluminium or copper<br />

pipes, but their rate <strong>of</strong> substitution is questionable because <strong>of</strong> their prices. Due to the excellent<br />

properties such as hardness, strength, cutting properties, wear resistance, and heat resistance,<br />

steel is considered to be the best material which is 100% recyclable. The threat from the side<br />

<strong>of</strong> substitutes is rather presented by different brand or type <strong>of</strong> pipe. We can conclude that the<br />

threat, it means power <strong>of</strong> substitutes, is low.<br />

D. Bargaining power <strong>of</strong> customers<br />

The bargaining power <strong>of</strong> customers is proportional to the size <strong>of</strong> purchased volumes <strong>of</strong><br />

production. Customers put pressure to improve quality, reduce errors, improve the properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> used material, to shorten delivery terms and prolong maturity <strong>of</strong> the invoice. Manufacturers<br />

<strong>of</strong> cars, who buy precision welded pipes with small diameters, require mandatory<br />

certification. They have substantial bargaining power and push to ensure more flexibility in<br />

prices, quotation and more favourable terms <strong>of</strong> delivery. The analyzed company customers<br />

are mostly small but also large firms, which purchasing power is medium.<br />

E. Bargaining power <strong>of</strong> suppliers<br />

Suppliers <strong>of</strong> the main input (steel scrap) have stronger bargaining power than other<br />

suppliers. Suppliers have moderate bargaining power, because there are no substitute products<br />

<strong>of</strong> steel scrap; and the steel scrap is the strategic material, which is only in a limited amount.<br />

The Porter analysis results in determination <strong>of</strong> the competitiveness order <strong>of</strong> the production<br />

programme’s individual groups in the sector. As we can see from the Figure 1, the seamless<br />

pipes can be recommended as the most favourable for further development. Split pipes and<br />

precision welded pipes are rated as the least attractive.<br />

Rolled pipes<br />

Precision<br />

seamless pipes<br />

Welded pipes<br />

Split pipes<br />

Large<br />

welded pipes<br />

Precision<br />

welded pipes<br />

Internal rivalry in the branch 3,5 1,5 3 4 4 3,5<br />

Entry <strong>of</strong> nex businesses 1,5 2 2,5 3 3 3<br />

Possibility <strong>of</strong> substitutes 3,5 2 3 3,5 2,5 2,5<br />

Bargaining power <strong>of</strong> suppliers 2 2 3,5 3 4 4<br />

Bargaining power <strong>of</strong> customenrs 2,5 1,5 4 3,5 3 4<br />

∑ 2,6 1,8 3,2 3,4 3,3 3,4<br />

Order <strong>of</strong> the competitiveness 2. 1. 4.–5. 3. 4.-5.<br />

Fig. 1 The Porter analyses <strong>of</strong> the selected company<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!