LOUDSPEAKERS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />
FURther ThoUGHts<br />
Acoustic Zen Crescendo ($16,500)<br />
There is something fundamentally right about the Crescendo, a threeway,<br />
5-driver transmission-line design. It speaks with one voice, a<br />
rarity for any multi-driver system, and obviously the consequence of<br />
superb driver integration. The transition from the bass to the midrange<br />
is seamless. It maintains a realistic tonal weight while doing justice to<br />
the power range of an orchestra. After reviewing the Crescendo in Issue<br />
229, this loudspeaker continues to re-calibrate my expectations in the<br />
bass range. Tympanic strikes are peerless in control and definition. While<br />
the Crescendo lacks ultimate bass extension, it makes up for that by<br />
superlative time-domain performance.<br />
—Dick Olsher<br />
Raidho C 1.1 ($18,000)<br />
Alongside the $26k Magico Q 1, the $18k<br />
Raidho C 1.1 is the finest two-way mini-monitor<br />
I have heard. However, the two speakers do not<br />
sound at all alike. The Magico sounds, well, like<br />
a Magico—which is to say, that it is rigorously<br />
neutral, leaning neither to the dark nor the light<br />
side in balance, remarkably seamless in blend (in fact, the<br />
best combination of a beryllium tweeter and carbon-sandwich<br />
driver in the Magico line), and paradigmatically transparent to<br />
sources ahead of it. The Raidho, on the other hand, is darker<br />
and considerably richer in balance; though very well blended<br />
its ribbon tweeter is not quite as much of a piece with its<br />
ceramic mid/woof (you can hear a very slight discontinuity<br />
between the two drivers, probably because of a difference in<br />
dispersion patterns); and while transparent enough to reveal<br />
tiny differences in musicianship, recording, and mastering, it<br />
has more “personality” of its own than the Magico. And yet…<br />
the Raidho is every bit as lifelike as the Magico (on great<br />
recordings), if not more so. Indeed, outside the $140k Raidho<br />
C 4.1, I haven’t heard a cone or cone-hybrid speaker that is<br />
more jaw-droppingly realistic than this mini from Denmark.<br />
That the Raidho C 1.1 is capable of sounding so much like the<br />
real thing in spite of its deviations from “textbook” neutrality<br />
raises a rather disturbing question—at least for a transparencyto-sources<br />
kind of listener like me. How is it that, in spite of<br />
my biases and convictions, I prefer a less (albeit only slightly<br />
less) accurate loudspeaker to a more accurate one I will<br />
address this question when I review the C 4.1. In the nonce,<br />
my enthusiasm for the C 1.1 has done anything but flag in the<br />
year I’ve been listening to it. As I said in TAS, this is a truly great<br />
loudspeaker, capable (with the right sources and ancillaries)<br />
of nearly unparalleled realism—and (regardless of source)<br />
consistently enjoyable to listen to.<br />
—Jonathan Valin<br />
13 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />
previous page<br />
NEXT page