03.01.2015 Views

LOUDSPEAKERS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />

FURther ThoUGHts<br />

Acoustic Zen Crescendo ($16,500)<br />

There is something fundamentally right about the Crescendo, a threeway,<br />

5-driver transmission-line design. It speaks with one voice, a<br />

rarity for any multi-driver system, and obviously the consequence of<br />

superb driver integration. The transition from the bass to the midrange<br />

is seamless. It maintains a realistic tonal weight while doing justice to<br />

the power range of an orchestra. After reviewing the Crescendo in Issue<br />

229, this loudspeaker continues to re-calibrate my expectations in the<br />

bass range. Tympanic strikes are peerless in control and definition. While<br />

the Crescendo lacks ultimate bass extension, it makes up for that by<br />

superlative time-domain performance.<br />

—Dick Olsher<br />

Raidho C 1.1 ($18,000)<br />

Alongside the $26k Magico Q 1, the $18k<br />

Raidho C 1.1 is the finest two-way mini-monitor<br />

I have heard. However, the two speakers do not<br />

sound at all alike. The Magico sounds, well, like<br />

a Magico—which is to say, that it is rigorously<br />

neutral, leaning neither to the dark nor the light<br />

side in balance, remarkably seamless in blend (in fact, the<br />

best combination of a beryllium tweeter and carbon-sandwich<br />

driver in the Magico line), and paradigmatically transparent to<br />

sources ahead of it. The Raidho, on the other hand, is darker<br />

and considerably richer in balance; though very well blended<br />

its ribbon tweeter is not quite as much of a piece with its<br />

ceramic mid/woof (you can hear a very slight discontinuity<br />

between the two drivers, probably because of a difference in<br />

dispersion patterns); and while transparent enough to reveal<br />

tiny differences in musicianship, recording, and mastering, it<br />

has more “personality” of its own than the Magico. And yet…<br />

the Raidho is every bit as lifelike as the Magico (on great<br />

recordings), if not more so. Indeed, outside the $140k Raidho<br />

C 4.1, I haven’t heard a cone or cone-hybrid speaker that is<br />

more jaw-droppingly realistic than this mini from Denmark.<br />

That the Raidho C 1.1 is capable of sounding so much like the<br />

real thing in spite of its deviations from “textbook” neutrality<br />

raises a rather disturbing question—at least for a transparencyto-sources<br />

kind of listener like me. How is it that, in spite of<br />

my biases and convictions, I prefer a less (albeit only slightly<br />

less) accurate loudspeaker to a more accurate one I will<br />

address this question when I review the C 4.1. In the nonce,<br />

my enthusiasm for the C 1.1 has done anything but flag in the<br />

year I’ve been listening to it. As I said in TAS, this is a truly great<br />

loudspeaker, capable (with the right sources and ancillaries)<br />

of nearly unparalleled realism—and (regardless of source)<br />

consistently enjoyable to listen to.<br />

—Jonathan Valin<br />

13 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />

previous page<br />

NEXT page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!