03.01.2015 Views

LOUDSPEAKERS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />

Paul Barton • PSB Speakers<br />

Speaker Designer<br />

Roundtable<br />

Paul Barton, founder and chief designer of PSB Speakers, began designing<br />

speakers more than 40 years ago for a Grade 10 Physics project. His<br />

engineering bent coupled nicely (for speaker designer purposes) with his abilities<br />

as a violinist, who as a young musician played with Canada’s National Youth Orchestra<br />

and the University of Toronto’s Repertoire Orchestra. His two passions converged<br />

permanently in 1972, when he founded PSB Speakers.<br />

One of the first to use the anechoic chamber at Canada’s renowned National<br />

Research Council facilities in Ottawa and other facilities there, Paul has combined<br />

research into the correlation of measurements and audible performance with testing of<br />

successive modifications of every speaker in process.<br />

In the mid-1980s, PSB became part of the Lenbrook Group of Companies, whose<br />

expertise in marketing specialized electronic products and widespread distribution in<br />

North America and around the world has established PSB Speakers as one of the most<br />

respected international loudspeaker manufacturers worldwide.<br />

What are the particular challenges and trade-offs of designing a<br />

small loudspeaker Which sonic qualities are you primarily trying to<br />

optimize, and which qualities are you most willing (or compelled) to<br />

give up<br />

The most challenging aspect of a small design is the ability for the<br />

small form factor to produce full-scale musical events realistically, both<br />

for loudness and dynamic range. This is even more challenging when<br />

the music contains wide bandwidth especially at low frequencies. One<br />

must remember that as the frequency is halved<br />

the excursion requirements for the woofer must<br />

double to maintain flat response. This means that<br />

a small speaker can produce very low frequencies,<br />

but can also be very strained if the low frequencies<br />

it is asked to reproduce are played too loud. The<br />

smaller size can also result in a design that is less<br />

efficient than a larger design. This means that you<br />

need more power to drive the small design to the<br />

same volume level as a full-sized speaker system.<br />

I am willing to compromise these things, but I<br />

like to think of a small design as the challenge of<br />

balancing all of these limitations. For me this has<br />

come from a lot of trial and error over my 40-year<br />

career in loudspeaker design.<br />

Do you have your own design techniques that<br />

maximize the performance of small designs<br />

One technique that I like to use to<br />

overcome the small size and realize<br />

a bigger sound than one would<br />

expect from such a small enclosure<br />

is the use of a Neodymium booster<br />

magnet on top of the woofer’s pole<br />

piece inside the voice-coil former.<br />

What this does is increase the force<br />

in the magnetic gap around the<br />

voice coil and results in more sensitivity<br />

and deeper bass response for<br />

a given box volume/size. In theory,<br />

if you increase the magnetic force<br />

around the voice coil to an infinite<br />

amount you can decrease the box’s<br />

air volume to nothing and maintain<br />

the same frequency response.<br />

Has your design work on larger<br />

loudspeakers informed your<br />

approach to stand-mounted<br />

ones<br />

I sort of see the reverse influence<br />

because small two-way designs<br />

have been helpful in keeping me<br />

grounded as to the basic rules<br />

that apply to good, cost-effective<br />

designs of any size. For me, a<br />

small-system design sets the bar<br />

for what you can do for a given<br />

amount of money and therefore<br />

puts things in perspective for what<br />

can be justified in cost for larger<br />

speaker systems.<br />

What, if any, sonic and technical<br />

advantages do small two-ways<br />

have over larger multiway<br />

systems<br />

The main advantage, whether<br />

intentional or by default, is the<br />

fact that the drivers (woofer and<br />

tweeter) must be close together,<br />

and along with the selection of the<br />

proper crossover frequency, can<br />

produce a coherent integration<br />

of the woofer and the tweeter at<br />

the crossover frequency. What I<br />

mean by this is if the drivers are<br />

physically closer together than the<br />

wavelength of the frequency that<br />

they both produce at the crossover<br />

point then the drivers together<br />

behave as a single source,<br />

which is what you want. It is also<br />

desirable to choose the crossover<br />

frequency where the woofer, at<br />

its highest operating frequency,<br />

has similar dispersion to the<br />

tweeter at the same frequency<br />

(its lowest operating frequency<br />

in the system). This approach<br />

always results in amazingly natural<br />

timbre, wonderful soundstaging,<br />

and very flexible positioning of the<br />

listener (seated or standing) and<br />

positioning of the speaker itself in<br />

your listening environment.<br />

25 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />

previous page NEXT page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!