LOUDSPEAKERS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />
Paul Barton • PSB Speakers<br />
Speaker Designer<br />
Roundtable<br />
Paul Barton, founder and chief designer of PSB Speakers, began designing<br />
speakers more than 40 years ago for a Grade 10 Physics project. His<br />
engineering bent coupled nicely (for speaker designer purposes) with his abilities<br />
as a violinist, who as a young musician played with Canada’s National Youth Orchestra<br />
and the University of Toronto’s Repertoire Orchestra. His two passions converged<br />
permanently in 1972, when he founded PSB Speakers.<br />
One of the first to use the anechoic chamber at Canada’s renowned National<br />
Research Council facilities in Ottawa and other facilities there, Paul has combined<br />
research into the correlation of measurements and audible performance with testing of<br />
successive modifications of every speaker in process.<br />
In the mid-1980s, PSB became part of the Lenbrook Group of Companies, whose<br />
expertise in marketing specialized electronic products and widespread distribution in<br />
North America and around the world has established PSB Speakers as one of the most<br />
respected international loudspeaker manufacturers worldwide.<br />
What are the particular challenges and trade-offs of designing a<br />
small loudspeaker Which sonic qualities are you primarily trying to<br />
optimize, and which qualities are you most willing (or compelled) to<br />
give up<br />
The most challenging aspect of a small design is the ability for the<br />
small form factor to produce full-scale musical events realistically, both<br />
for loudness and dynamic range. This is even more challenging when<br />
the music contains wide bandwidth especially at low frequencies. One<br />
must remember that as the frequency is halved<br />
the excursion requirements for the woofer must<br />
double to maintain flat response. This means that<br />
a small speaker can produce very low frequencies,<br />
but can also be very strained if the low frequencies<br />
it is asked to reproduce are played too loud. The<br />
smaller size can also result in a design that is less<br />
efficient than a larger design. This means that you<br />
need more power to drive the small design to the<br />
same volume level as a full-sized speaker system.<br />
I am willing to compromise these things, but I<br />
like to think of a small design as the challenge of<br />
balancing all of these limitations. For me this has<br />
come from a lot of trial and error over my 40-year<br />
career in loudspeaker design.<br />
Do you have your own design techniques that<br />
maximize the performance of small designs<br />
One technique that I like to use to<br />
overcome the small size and realize<br />
a bigger sound than one would<br />
expect from such a small enclosure<br />
is the use of a Neodymium booster<br />
magnet on top of the woofer’s pole<br />
piece inside the voice-coil former.<br />
What this does is increase the force<br />
in the magnetic gap around the<br />
voice coil and results in more sensitivity<br />
and deeper bass response for<br />
a given box volume/size. In theory,<br />
if you increase the magnetic force<br />
around the voice coil to an infinite<br />
amount you can decrease the box’s<br />
air volume to nothing and maintain<br />
the same frequency response.<br />
Has your design work on larger<br />
loudspeakers informed your<br />
approach to stand-mounted<br />
ones<br />
I sort of see the reverse influence<br />
because small two-way designs<br />
have been helpful in keeping me<br />
grounded as to the basic rules<br />
that apply to good, cost-effective<br />
designs of any size. For me, a<br />
small-system design sets the bar<br />
for what you can do for a given<br />
amount of money and therefore<br />
puts things in perspective for what<br />
can be justified in cost for larger<br />
speaker systems.<br />
What, if any, sonic and technical<br />
advantages do small two-ways<br />
have over larger multiway<br />
systems<br />
The main advantage, whether<br />
intentional or by default, is the<br />
fact that the drivers (woofer and<br />
tweeter) must be close together,<br />
and along with the selection of the<br />
proper crossover frequency, can<br />
produce a coherent integration<br />
of the woofer and the tweeter at<br />
the crossover frequency. What I<br />
mean by this is if the drivers are<br />
physically closer together than the<br />
wavelength of the frequency that<br />
they both produce at the crossover<br />
point then the drivers together<br />
behave as a single source,<br />
which is what you want. It is also<br />
desirable to choose the crossover<br />
frequency where the woofer, at<br />
its highest operating frequency,<br />
has similar dispersion to the<br />
tweeter at the same frequency<br />
(its lowest operating frequency<br />
in the system). This approach<br />
always results in amazingly natural<br />
timbre, wonderful soundstaging,<br />
and very flexible positioning of the<br />
listener (seated or standing) and<br />
positioning of the speaker itself in<br />
your listening environment.<br />
25 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />
previous page NEXT page