LOUDSPEAKERS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />
Andrew Jones • Technical Audio Devices (TAD)<br />
Speaker Designer<br />
Roundtable<br />
Being born in stereo (Andrew has an identical twin brother who is left<br />
handed while he is right—making them a stereo pair from birth!) made a<br />
career in audio perhaps pre-destined.<br />
Gaining an interest in electronics and hi-fi in his pre-teens informed his decision<br />
to study Physics at university, followed by six years of research in audio topics<br />
such as computer modeling of crossover networks and active noise cancellation.<br />
In 1983 he was invited to join KEF Electronics as a research engineer, progressing<br />
to become Chief Engineer. After eleven years at KEF he moved to the USA to join<br />
Infinity.<br />
In 1997 he was invited to join Pioneer to lead the engineering group in designing<br />
speakers. This culminated in the formation, 10 years ago, of the consumer division<br />
of TAD, and the exploration of designs without compromise.<br />
His spare time (what spare time) is split between travel, tending to his dogs and<br />
cats (yes, plural, very), and archery (he recently qualified as a coach and is to be<br />
found teaching each weekend when he is home at the local archery range).<br />
What are the particular challenges and trade-offs of designing a<br />
small loudspeaker Which sonic qualities are you primarily trying to<br />
optimize, and which qualities are you most willing (or compelled) to<br />
give up<br />
Small speakers typically lack the sense of scale and dynamics of large<br />
ones, the qualities that give you that sense of reality, effortlessness, and<br />
ease. In contrast they can disappear in a way that is difficult to achieve<br />
from large speakers. The challenge is in retaining both. Typically smaller<br />
speakers are used in smaller rooms, so the designer can take advantage of<br />
this to some degree and use the room gain to offset the loss of dynamics<br />
in the midbass region. Also smaller speakers are normally equated with<br />
lower-cost speakers and that brings its own set of compromises that are<br />
independent of size. When cost is divorced from size then the performance<br />
loss from small speakers can be made very small indeed, and be confined<br />
only to very low, very loud bass.<br />
Do you have your own design techniques that<br />
maximize the performance of small designs<br />
Generally, the first thing to go from small speakers<br />
is bass. In order to maximize bass extension, one<br />
must necessarily give up efficiency. This means<br />
that to get any degree of real-scale dynamics you<br />
must put in a lot of power. The speaker not only has<br />
to handle this power without damage, it must do<br />
so without dynamic compression. Compression in<br />
the mids and highs can be dealt with by designing<br />
the drivers to have high inherent efficiency, but for<br />
the bass driver this is not an option. Piling on more<br />
magnet, or using a lighter cone, only gives less low<br />
bass. For any size of cabinet and required bass<br />
extension there is an optimum set of parameters of<br />
mass and magnet strength that will give the correct<br />
bass alignment, so the only solution is to design<br />
30 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />
previous page NEXT page