03.01.2015 Views

LOUDSPEAKERS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

go to: Contents | Features | Bookshelf, Stand-Mount and Desktop | Floorstanding | Editors' Choice Awards<br />

Andrew Jones • Technical Audio Devices (TAD)<br />

Speaker Designer<br />

Roundtable<br />

Being born in stereo (Andrew has an identical twin brother who is left<br />

handed while he is right—making them a stereo pair from birth!) made a<br />

career in audio perhaps pre-destined.<br />

Gaining an interest in electronics and hi-fi in his pre-teens informed his decision<br />

to study Physics at university, followed by six years of research in audio topics<br />

such as computer modeling of crossover networks and active noise cancellation.<br />

In 1983 he was invited to join KEF Electronics as a research engineer, progressing<br />

to become Chief Engineer. After eleven years at KEF he moved to the USA to join<br />

Infinity.<br />

In 1997 he was invited to join Pioneer to lead the engineering group in designing<br />

speakers. This culminated in the formation, 10 years ago, of the consumer division<br />

of TAD, and the exploration of designs without compromise.<br />

His spare time (what spare time) is split between travel, tending to his dogs and<br />

cats (yes, plural, very), and archery (he recently qualified as a coach and is to be<br />

found teaching each weekend when he is home at the local archery range).<br />

What are the particular challenges and trade-offs of designing a<br />

small loudspeaker Which sonic qualities are you primarily trying to<br />

optimize, and which qualities are you most willing (or compelled) to<br />

give up<br />

Small speakers typically lack the sense of scale and dynamics of large<br />

ones, the qualities that give you that sense of reality, effortlessness, and<br />

ease. In contrast they can disappear in a way that is difficult to achieve<br />

from large speakers. The challenge is in retaining both. Typically smaller<br />

speakers are used in smaller rooms, so the designer can take advantage of<br />

this to some degree and use the room gain to offset the loss of dynamics<br />

in the midbass region. Also smaller speakers are normally equated with<br />

lower-cost speakers and that brings its own set of compromises that are<br />

independent of size. When cost is divorced from size then the performance<br />

loss from small speakers can be made very small indeed, and be confined<br />

only to very low, very loud bass.<br />

Do you have your own design techniques that<br />

maximize the performance of small designs<br />

Generally, the first thing to go from small speakers<br />

is bass. In order to maximize bass extension, one<br />

must necessarily give up efficiency. This means<br />

that to get any degree of real-scale dynamics you<br />

must put in a lot of power. The speaker not only has<br />

to handle this power without damage, it must do<br />

so without dynamic compression. Compression in<br />

the mids and highs can be dealt with by designing<br />

the drivers to have high inherent efficiency, but for<br />

the bass driver this is not an option. Piling on more<br />

magnet, or using a lighter cone, only gives less low<br />

bass. For any size of cabinet and required bass<br />

extension there is an optimum set of parameters of<br />

mass and magnet strength that will give the correct<br />

bass alignment, so the only solution is to design<br />

30 Guide to High-Performance Loudspeakers www.theabsolutesound.com<br />

previous page NEXT page

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!