introduction-weak-interaction-volume-one
introduction-weak-interaction-volume-one
introduction-weak-interaction-volume-one
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 .5 The Conservation of Leptons .<br />
In 1955, Davis (20) suggested the assignment of a quantum number know n<br />
as leptonic charge or lepton number to all particles . The electron, muon, and<br />
neutrinos would have a lepton number of +1, while their antiparticles woul d<br />
have L = -1 . All other particles would have L =0 . Thus, for any particl e<br />
L = e 4- y , (4 .5 .1 )<br />
where e and)). are its electron and muon number respectively (see 4 .3) .<br />
The analogue of lepton number in the strong interactio n7 is baryon number .<br />
The latter is carried by all particles subject to the strong <strong>interaction</strong> .<br />
If baryon number is conserved, then the proton must be stable, since it i s<br />
the lightest baryon . Stuckleberg and Wigner have studied the stability of th e<br />
proton, and have thus deduced that baryon number is conserved to better than<br />
<strong>one</strong> part in 1 0 43 . From studying leptonic and semileptonic reactions, it i s<br />
easy to see that lepton number is also conserved . Thus the electron must b e<br />
stable, since it is the lightest charged lepton . The neutrinos cannot decay ,<br />
since they are the lightest leptons .<br />
We now consider some of the evidence for lepton conservation . If thi s<br />
conservation law holds good, then the nuclear deca y<br />
(Z, A) >(Z+ 2, A) t 2e , (4 .5 .2 )<br />
known as double beta decay, should never occur, since it violates the law of<br />
the conservation of lepton number . The decay<br />
(Z, A)• :. (Z+ 2, A) + 2e + 2ve (4 .5 .3 )<br />
is, however, permitted . The decay (4 .5 .3) may be distinguished from (4 .5 .2)<br />
in experiments by observing the electron energy distribution . In (4 .5 .2) ,<br />
the electrons share the full decay energy, whereas in (4 .5 .3), some of thi s<br />
is removed by the antineutrinos . If (4 .5 .2) were allowed, then it shoul d<br />
have a rate about 10 5 times greater than that of the permitted decay (4 .5 .3) .<br />
Recently, it has been suggested that double beta decay occurs in nature (21) :<br />
Te 130 @F > Xe 130 ( 4 .5 .4 )<br />
and there is convincing geological evidence to support this view . The measured<br />
half—life for the process (4 .5 .4) is 10 21 .34 t0 .12 yr . The theoretical<br />
prediction for a neutrinoless decay is 1 01.3 '' 2 yr and that for a decay with