05.01.2015 Views

Review 3 final 2 - TAU - National Treasury

Review 3 final 2 - TAU - National Treasury

Review 3 final 2 - TAU - National Treasury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE UNIT REVIEW | SIMULTANEOUS MAINSTREAMING OF GENDER AND DISABILITY<br />

variations in practice to overcome inequalities based<br />

on gender and disability. In practice, gender and<br />

disability equality norms often have to fight their way<br />

into institutional thinking as these norms are perceived<br />

to be in conflict with traditional organizational norms<br />

and in competition with core business priorities. 8 In<br />

business, the goal of competitiveness of the economy<br />

takes precedence over equality considerations, thereby<br />

condoning the many manifestations of gender and<br />

disability inequality such as unequal pay and job<br />

stereotyping.<br />

Compliance to Law and Policy<br />

There is always a link between good governance and<br />

compliance with law and policy. Good governance is<br />

not something that exists separately from the law and<br />

it is entirely inappropriate to unhinge governance from<br />

the law. The eradication of discrimination based on<br />

gender and disability, as envisioned in the Bill of Rights,<br />

has shifted compliance from the voluntary to the<br />

obligatory domain. No longer do public and private<br />

sector organisations have the choice of whether or<br />

not to remove barriers and to accommodate women<br />

and persons with disabilities. The starting point of any<br />

analysis on this topic is the duty of office bearers to<br />

discharge their legal duties in respect of gender and<br />

disability equality and removal of unlawful and unfair<br />

discrimination.<br />

Implementation challenges<br />

Gender and disability mainstreaming has the potential<br />

to be transformative in nature, changing the dominant<br />

paradigms in which we work. However, the essence<br />

of gender and disability mainstreaming makes it<br />

a challenge to implement. The task is formidable<br />

not only because of the inherently political nature<br />

of its transformative potential, but because of the<br />

challenge of scale in terms of range and the nature<br />

of change required. 9 Realising the potential of gender<br />

and disability mainstreaming requires significant and<br />

systematic change. Experience to date suggests that<br />

the move from policy to practice has been challenging,<br />

and while policy and strategies have varied in their<br />

impact, they have, however, all fallen short of the<br />

articulated goal of gender equality. In most cases,<br />

implementation has also fallen well short of declared<br />

policy. 10<br />

Governance Imperatives<br />

Setting priorities, goals and targets<br />

The first and perhaps most essential task for<br />

governance is articulating a set of priorities and<br />

goals for mainstreaming gender and disability that<br />

are in line with the legal and policy framework for<br />

gender and disability and that can be agreed upon<br />

by the members of the organisation. This set of<br />

goals on the organisational level reflects the national<br />

and internationally agreed-upon standards and<br />

benchmarks for gender and disability.<br />

Setting up structures and processes<br />

Corporate governance mainly involves the<br />

establishment of structures and processes, with<br />

appropriate checks and balances that enable office<br />

bearers to discharge their legal responsibilities and<br />

oversee compliance with legislation in respect of<br />

equality and non-discrimination based on gender and<br />

disability. The more established certain governance<br />

practices become, the more likely a court would regard<br />

conduct that conforms with these practices as meeting<br />

the required standard. Governance practices, codes and<br />

guidelines therefore lift the bar of what are regarded as<br />

appropriate standards of conduct. Consequently, any<br />

failure to meet a recognised standard of governance,<br />

albeit not legislated, may render a board or individual<br />

director liable at law. 11<br />

32<br />

page<br />

Enabling change for development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!