05.01.2015 Views

Critical Thinking Skills - Developing Effective Analysis and Argument(2)

Critical Thinking Skills - Developing Effective Analysis and Argument(2)

Critical Thinking Skills - Developing Effective Analysis and Argument(2)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Activity: Selecting out the argument (2)<br />

ur shields are up,<br />

The earthlings won't be<br />

\ able to detect our research<br />

\_mission this time either.<br />

other intelligent life.<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> of Passage 4.17<br />

anyone out there<br />

Is there<br />

The numbers in brackets refer to the tasks set in<br />

the activity box on page 59.<br />

(1) Conclusion It is unlikely that there is<br />

extraterrestrial life (line 18). The final<br />

sentence summarises the argument that<br />

supports this conclusion.<br />

(2) Reason 1 For over 100 years, radio waves<br />

have been used to track space for signs of<br />

life <strong>and</strong> so far have uncovered nothing (lines<br />

18-20).<br />

(2) Reason 2 This uses the refuted argument<br />

referred to in (3) below, that it is probable<br />

that the exacting conditions required for life<br />

(chemicals <strong>and</strong> physics, water <strong>and</strong><br />

atmosphere) are unlikely to be found again<br />

(lines 3540).<br />

(3) Author's consideration of opposing<br />

theories The author considers alternative<br />

theories such as convergence <strong>and</strong> plenitude<br />

theories. These are refuted in lines 35-40<br />

<strong>and</strong> the refutation is harnessed as a reason<br />

to support the conclusion.<br />

(4) Introduction Lines 1-5.<br />

(5) Description Lines (1 1-16) describe<br />

contingency theory. They list the key points<br />

of the theory. Although the author does<br />

describe this argument as 'compelling', no<br />

reasons are given to show why it is<br />

compelling, so this is description, not<br />

argument or explanation. In this case, the<br />

description is also likely to be a summary of<br />

longer accounts of the theory.<br />

(6) Explanation Lines 23-33 explain<br />

convergence theory. Unlike lines 11-16,<br />

these lines do more than simply list or<br />

describe what the theory says. Instead, they<br />

give examples to help clarify what is meant<br />

by the theory <strong>and</strong> draw out general<br />

principles from those examples: 'this<br />

suggests that . . .' (line 29). They also bring<br />

out what is significant about the theory:<br />

'This suggests that although there may be<br />

infinite possibilities in the universe, nature<br />

tends to repeat itself.'<br />

(7) Summary of the material so far: lines<br />

16-17. 'Thus, we have very divergent<br />

theories on whether there is life out there or<br />

not.'<br />

(8) Background information Lines 5-8<br />

'One traditional argument. . . bear<br />

intelligent life', present background<br />

information to set the scene. The argument<br />

isn't introduced until line 18. Further<br />

background information is presented in<br />

lines 10 to 16: 'Not so, argue those who<br />

subscribe to contingency theory. . .<br />

processes could ever occur again.'<br />

60 <strong>Critical</strong> <strong>Thinking</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><br />

I<br />

0 Stella Cottrell (ZOOS), <strong>Critical</strong> Tlzinking <strong>Skills</strong>, I<br />

Palgrave Macmillan Ltd

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!