08.01.2015 Views

Mar - Rcsoaring.com

Mar - Rcsoaring.com

Mar - Rcsoaring.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

features an extended length antenna.<br />

We’re going to go back to the time before<br />

the AR500 when the JR /Spektrum<br />

systems used only the 32-mm antennas.<br />

This experiment differs from the 72-Mhz<br />

experiment in that I figured I would rather<br />

not take a chance on the theory of a CF<br />

fuselage <strong>com</strong>pletely blocking the RF<br />

signal on 2.4. I suspected that maybe<br />

some of that RF might actually penetrate<br />

the fuselage, and with that in mind, we<br />

pressed forward with making our own<br />

extended antenna. But wait... why extend<br />

the antenna<br />

We needed to extend the antenna for a<br />

couple of reasons. The first was that by<br />

simply placing the Rx inside the fuselage,<br />

there was not enough antenna to poke<br />

out the skin of the plane to receive signal.<br />

Despite a sailplane being very narrow,<br />

the antenna needs to be 32-mm long.<br />

Also, it’s a pain in the buns to get the<br />

Rx in a place where you can even poke<br />

the antennas out. Lastly, where I wanted<br />

to place the Rx inside the plane would<br />

result in the antennas poking out right<br />

where I grip the plane for the launch... not<br />

good! So, I needed to extend the antenna<br />

length. After some careful figuring, I<br />

settled on making each antenna another<br />

40-mm longer.<br />

I started with taking some twin<br />

conductor shielded wire and removing<br />

one conductor from the length. The<br />

remaining conductor was then spliced<br />

on to the original Rx antenna right as it<br />

exits the casing. So, now we have 40-<br />

mm of shielded wire with another 32-mm<br />

of normal antenna at the far end. The<br />

shielding is not grounded or connected<br />

to anything... just wrapped around the<br />

wire. With the Rx on a table in the open,<br />

it performed a perfect range check. This<br />

is good, because by theory, it should not<br />

work. People tell me that the shielding<br />

must be GROUNDED for it to work.<br />

Well, guess what It works and it ain’t<br />

grounded. Remember that all we’re trying<br />

to do is to block the RF by the shielded<br />

portion of the antenna wire. Grounded or<br />

not, the shielding worked.<br />

Now we go to the Rx being inside that<br />

cozy CF fuselage. The Rx is a JR R921<br />

9-channel unit, using a single remote<br />

satellite Rx. Both main and satellite<br />

Rx are given the extended antenna<br />

treatment and range checked. No<br />

problem. Now we do the same range<br />

check with the Rx’s installed in the plane<br />

and antennas sticking out like whiskers.<br />

No difference! It works! We then perform<br />

a <strong>com</strong>plete 360 range check, and the<br />

result is fabulous... no problems. We then<br />

gritted our teeth and made a full power<br />

winch launch. I figure if we’re going to<br />

pile in a plane, let’s do it right! I was not<br />

disappointed, as the plane made like it<br />

was always done this way, quite happy<br />

to range out some 3500-ft away on that<br />

first flight with the new antennas. As for<br />

the fuselage leaking RF through the skin<br />

Yup, there is some leakage as proven<br />

by a range check done with a stock Rx<br />

stuck inside the fuselage. The Rx got<br />

about 1/3 range before losing signal. As<br />

long as there is some range achieved,<br />

there is RF getting through.<br />

I proceeded to make this a big deal and<br />

made postings of the experiment on RC<br />

Groups. The flak I took was amazing!<br />

Engineers, electronics experts, naysayers<br />

and skeptics piled on personal<br />

messages and responses that said I<br />

must be a liar about this, and that it’s<br />

all made up. Amazingly, some people<br />

actually defended me as they had seen<br />

the plane fly at a very large contest event<br />

not two weeks after I made the change. I<br />

can’t tell you how many people wanted to<br />

see what I did inside that bird, but I finally<br />

just left the canopy off so that anyone<br />

could look inside.<br />

By the way, some people using the<br />

whisker approach just don’t seem to get<br />

it. You only need to have the bare 32-mm<br />

of wire exposed outside the CF skin of<br />

a plane. I have seen a number of plane<br />

using the Futaba systems with very long<br />

whiskers hanging out. And I mean like 4<br />

to 5 inches of whisker! It’s weird enough<br />

to see 32-mm of wire out there, but 4 to<br />

5 inches is like cat whiskers <strong>com</strong>pared to<br />

my short “stubble” growth.<br />

Section 3 – the daring stuff<br />

32 R/C Soaring Digest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!