Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

More documents

Recommendations

Info

XII Regulations and rules—Continued: Page Section 9.5(f)...................................4 Section 9.5(h) ..................................4 Section 9.5(i)...................................4 Section 9.5(k) ...............................4, 46 Section 9.6(h) ..................................4 International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia R.P. & Evid.: Rule 80 ......................................46 Rule 89(c) ....................................47 Miscellaneous: William E. Berkhimer, Military <strong>Government</strong> and Martial Law (3d ed. 1914) ........................46 Curtis A. Bradley & Jack L. Goldsmith, Congressional Authorization and the War on Terrorism, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2047 (2005) ...........19 151 Cong. Rec. S12,754 (daily ed. Nov. 14, 2005) ........42 George B. Davis, A Treatise on the Military Law of the United States (1913) .....................21. 22 Ingrid Detter, The Law of War (2d ed. 2000) ...........25 G.I.A.D. Draper, The Red Cross Conventions (1958) ..........................................39 2B Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949 ..................................39 Louis Fisher, Congressional Research Service, Military Tribunals: The Quirin Precedent (Mar. 26, 2002) ..................................47 H.R. Rep. No. 491, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. (1949) .........18 H.R. Rep. No. 698, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. (1996) ........28
XIII Miscellaneous—Continued: Page Richard S. Hartigan, Lieber’s Code and the Law of War (1963) ............................47 Charles Roscoe Howland, Digest of Opinions of the Judge Advocates General of the Army 1071 (1912) . . . 27 International Committee of the Red Cross, Commentary to the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (1960) ..............................34, 42, 48 Howard S. Levie, Prisoners of War in International Armed Conflict, 59 Int’l L. Stud. 1 (1977) .......................................33, 41 W. Thomas Mallison & Sally V. Mallison, Juridical Status of Irregular Combatants Under the International Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 9 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 39 (1977) .........41 Manual for Courts-Martial (2005) . . . .................45 Memorandum from Gordon England, Secretary of the Navy, Regarding the Implementation of CSRT Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo (July 29, 2004) .........42 Military Commission Order No. 1 (Dep’t of Def. Aug. 31, 2005) .................................4, 46 Military Order of Nov. 13, 2001: Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism, 3 C.F.R. 918 (2002) .................... 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 24, 47, 49, 12a Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987): Vol. 1 ........................................31 Vol. 2 ........................................31
Page 1 and 2: No. 05-184 In the Supreme Court of
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Jurisdiction
Page 5 and 6: V Cases—Continued: Page Foster v.
Page 7 and 8: VII Cases—Continued: Page United
Page 9 and 10: IX Treaties, statutes, regulations,
Page 11: XI Statutes, regulations, and rules
Page 15 and 16: In the Supreme Court of the United
Page 17 and 18: 3 2. a. In November 2001, petitione
Page 19 and 20: 5 Qaeda,” and that he was therefo
Page 21 and 22: 7 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT I. Petitioner
Page 23 and 24: 9 ity in wartime to hold enemy figh
Page 25 and 26: 11 tured in the United States, Ex p
Page 27 and 28: 13 entertaining “habeas petitions
Page 29 and 30: 15 sion,” and that judicial revie
Page 31 and 32: 17 AUMF authorized the use of milit
Page 33 and 34: 19 UCMJ applies to armed conflicts
Page 35 and 36: 21 Eisentrager, 339 U.S. at 788. Th
Page 37 and 38: 23 The President’s inherent autho
Page 39 and 40: 25 no basis for this Court to inval
Page 41 and 42: 27 1. Military commissions may be a
Page 43 and 44: 29 particular reference to the fact
Page 45 and 46: 31 253, 306 (1829); see generally U
Page 47 and 48: 33 spected * * * in all circumstanc
Page 49 and 50: 35 ever, create no enforceable fede
Page 51 and 52: 37 court of appeals to have conside
Page 53 and 54: 39 applicable to “all cases of de
Page 55 and 56: 41 tenced only if the sentence has
Page 57 and 58: 43 E. Petitioner Does Not Enjoy The
Page 59 and 60: 45 commission. The Court described
Page 61 and 62: 47 (3d ed. 1914); see Richard S. Ha
Page 63 and 64:
49 armed conflicts, * * * which are
Page 65 and 66:
APPENDIX 1. 10 U.S.C. 821, Art. 21,
Page 67 and 68:
3a Committee on the Judiciary of th
Page 69 and 70:
5a (2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—Each s
Page 71 and 72:
7a (ii) to the extent the Constitut
Page 73 and 74:
9a and Nationality Act and, in part
Page 75 and 76:
SECTION 2. 11a AUTHORIZATION FOR US
Page 77 and 78:
13a (d) The ability of the United S
Page 79 and 80:
15a Sec. 3. Detention Authority of
Page 81 and 82:
17a (8) of the record of the trial,
Page 83 and 84:
19a 6. Geneva Convention relative t
Page 85 and 86:
21a (c) outrages upon personal dign
Page 87 and 88:
23a B. The following shall likewise
Page 89 and 90:
25a * * * * * ARTICLE 11 In cases w
show all

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?