09.01.2015 Views

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25a<br />

* * * * *<br />

ARTICLE 11<br />

In cases where they deem it advisable in the interest of<br />

protected persons particularly in cases of disagreement<br />

between the Parties to the conflict as to the application or<br />

interpretation of the provisions of the present Convention,<br />

the Protecting Powers shall lend their good offices with a<br />

view to settling the disagreement.<br />

For this purpose, each of the Protecting Powers may,<br />

either at the invitation of one Party or on its own initiative,<br />

propose to the Parties to the conflict a meeting of their<br />

representatives, and in particular of the authorities<br />

responsible for prisoners of war, possibly on neutral<br />

territory suitably chosen. The Parties to the conflict shall be<br />

bound to give effect to the proposals made to them for this<br />

purpose. The Protecting Powers may, if necessary, propose<br />

for approval by the Parties to the conflict a person belonging<br />

to a neutral Power, or delegated by the International<br />

Committee of the Red Cross, who shall be invited to take<br />

part in such a meeting.<br />

* * * * *<br />

ARTICLE 132<br />

At the request of a Party to the conflict, an enquiry shall<br />

be instituted, in a manner to be decided between the<br />

interested Parties, concerning any alleged violation of the<br />

Convention.<br />

If agreement has not been reached concerning the<br />

procedure for the enquiry, the Parties should agree on the<br />

choice of an umpire who will decide upon the procedure to be<br />

followed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!