09.01.2015 Views

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

45<br />

commission. The Court described military commissions as<br />

“our common-law war courts” and observed that “[n]either<br />

their procedure nor their jurisdiction has been prescribed by<br />

statute.” 343 U.S. at 346-347. Rather, the Court noted, the<br />

military commission “has been adapted in each instance to the<br />

need that called it forth.” Id. at 347-348. The Court further<br />

explained that, in contrast to its active regulation of “the jurisdiction<br />

and procedure of United States courts-martial,”<br />

Congress had shown “evident restraint” with respect to the<br />

regulation of military commissions. Id. at 349. The Court<br />

concluded that, “[i]n the absence of attempts by Congress to<br />

limit the President’s power,” the President “may, in time of<br />

war, establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of<br />

military commissions.” Id. at 348; see Quirin, 317 U.S. at 30<br />

(noting that Congress rejected option of “crystallizing in permanent<br />

form and in minute detail every offense” triable by<br />

commissions and instead “adopt[ed] the system of common<br />

law applied by the military tribunals”). 20<br />

Petitioner suggests (Br. 19-20 n.10) that regulations and<br />

historical practice “confirm that commissions follow courtmartial<br />

rules.” He quotes a portion of the preamble to the<br />

Manual for Courts Martial, which states that “military commissions<br />

* * * shall be guided by the appropriate principles<br />

of law and rules of procedure and evidence prescribed for<br />

courts-martial.” See Manual for Courts-Martial, pt. 1, para.<br />

2(b)(2), at I.1 (2005). That captures roughly half the common<br />

sense of the matter. Of course, military commissions, which<br />

tend to be an episodic response to particular conflicts, borrow<br />

from the permanent procedures for courts-martial where ap-<br />

20 Although Madsen interpreted the Articles of War (notwithstanding the<br />

fact that UCMJ had already been enacted, see 343 U.S. at 345 n.6), the relevant<br />

provisions of the UCMJ are identical in all material respects to their counterparts<br />

in the Articles of War. Compare Articles of War arts. 15 and 38, 39 Stat.<br />

653, 656, with UCMJ arts. 21 and 36, 10 U.S.C. 821, 836.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!