Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Government Merits Brief - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
31<br />
253, 306 (1829); see generally U.S. Br. at 11-16, Bustillo v.<br />
Johnson, No. 05-51 (to be argued March 29, 2006).<br />
To be sure, treaties can, and on occasion do, create judicially<br />
enforceable private rights. But since such treaties are<br />
the exception, rather than the rule, there is a presumption<br />
that a treaty will be enforced through political and diplomatic<br />
channels, rather than through the courts. United States v.<br />
Emuegbunam, 268 F.3d 377, 389-390 (6th Cir. 2001), cert.<br />
denied, 535 U.S. 977 (2002); United States v. De La Pava, 268<br />
F.3d 157, 164 (2d Cir. 2001); United States v. Jimenez-Nava,<br />
243 F.3d 192, 195-196 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 962<br />
(2001); United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 56, 61 (1st Cir.), cert.<br />
denied, 531 U.S. 956 (2000). That background principle applies<br />
even when a treaty benefits private individuals. See 2<br />
Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the<br />
United States § 907 cmt. a, at 395 (1987) (“International<br />
agreements, even those directly benefitting private persons,<br />
generally do not create private rights or provide for a private<br />
right of action in domestic courts.”). And it applies wholly<br />
apart from whether the treaty is self-executing (i.e., whether<br />
the treaty requires implementing legislation to be given effect).<br />
See 1 id. § 111 cmt. h, at 47; Carlos Manuel Vazquez,<br />
The Four Doctrines of Self-Executing Treaties, 89 Am. J. Int’l<br />
L. 695, 721 (1995).<br />
In Eisentrager, this Court held that captured Nazi combatants<br />
challenging the jurisdiction of a military tribunal<br />
could not invoke the 1929 version of the Geneva Convention<br />
because the Convention was not judicially enforceable. 339<br />
U.S. at 789. Like the current version of the Convention, the<br />
1929 version contained various provisions that protected individual<br />
rights. See, e.g., Convention Relative to the Treatment<br />
of Prisoners of War, July 27, 1929, arts. 2, 3, 16, 42, 47 Stat.<br />
2021, 2031, 2036, 2045, 118 L.N.T.S. 343, 357, 363, 373 (1929<br />
Convention). The Court explained, however, that the Conven-