11.01.2015 Views

annual report1-final.qxd - Overseas Indian

annual report1-final.qxd - Overseas Indian

annual report1-final.qxd - Overseas Indian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Roundtable 2<br />

regulatory framework. !<br />

ROUND TABLE II<br />

INDIA: ECONOMIC POWERHOUSE<br />

Chair:<br />

Speaker:<br />

Suresh Prabhu,<br />

Member of<br />

Parliament<br />

Roopa Purushottam,<br />

Goldman Sachs<br />

Roopa Purushothaman presented the BRIC report,<br />

which focused on a dramatically different global economy.<br />

The objective of the report was to understand<br />

shifts in global spending power and foresaw a 50-year<br />

roadmap of growth and incomes.<br />

It further mentioned that the BRIC economies (Brazil,<br />

Russia, India and China) could be larger than the G6 in<br />

USD terms in less than 40 years while China could<br />

overtake the U.S. as the world’s largest economy in a little<br />

over 30 years. Of the current G6, only the U.S. and<br />

Japan might be among the six largest economies in<br />

2050. She said that new demand from the BRIC<br />

economies could rival the current G6 within a decade<br />

and dwarf it by 2050. However, individuals in BRIC are<br />

still likely to be poorer on average than individuals in<br />

the G6 economies, except in Russia. Therefore, she suggested<br />

that there was a need for some basic conditions.<br />

These were sound and stable macroeconomic policies,<br />

strong political institutions, openness and high levels of<br />

education. India had the most work to do in broadening<br />

education, she reminded.<br />

While looking at the investment scenario,<br />

Purushottam mentioned that in India, trade share was<br />

low but rising in respect to other BRICs. Though the<br />

service sector was growing, it would still not solve the<br />

problem. Even IT share was small. In coming years,<br />

there could be some positive spillovers, but employment<br />

would remain an issue. While comparing China<br />

and India, Purushottam highlighted that there were<br />

many similarities in both the countries like impressive<br />

growth performance over the past decade, massive<br />

labour force potential, strong diasporas to participate in<br />

economic development.<br />

However there were also stark contrasts between the<br />

two — like India focusing on services instead of manufacturing.<br />

There was also the problem of contrasting<br />

political structures as well as different approaches to<br />

investment. India was about 10-15 years behind China<br />

in the process, she said.<br />

She summed up the presentation by saying that<br />

India’s growth rate remained above five percent<br />

throughout the period. India’s GDP would outstrip that<br />

of Japan by 2032. Though India’s income per capita in<br />

2050 would rise to 35 times from the current levels, still<br />

it would be significantly lower than the other countries.<br />

Hence, critical issues for sustainable development are<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!