A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Thickets</strong> 61<br />
6 Bibliography<br />
Allison, J.R., Lemley, M.A., Walker, J., 2011. <strong>Patent</strong> Quality and Risk Aversion Among Repeat<br />
<strong>Patent</strong> Litigants. Georgetown Law Journal 99, 677–712.<br />
Anyadike-Danes, M., Bonner, K., Hart, M., Mason, C., 2010. Measuring Business Growth:<br />
High-growth firms and their contribution to employent in the <strong>UK</strong>. London, <strong>UK</strong>: NESTA.<br />
Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., Cohen, W.M., 2008. R&D and the patent premium. International<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Organization 26, 1153–1179.<br />
Arundel, A., Patel, P., 2003. Strategic <strong>Patent</strong>ing, Background Report for the Trend Chart Policy<br />
Benchmarking Workshop New Trends. Available at http://proinno.intras<strong>of</strong>t.be/reports/<br />
documents/TCW15_background_paper.pdf.<br />
Balasubramanian, N., Sivadasan, J., 2011. What happens when firms patent New evidence<br />
from US Economic Census data. Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics 93, 126–146.<br />
Bawa, R., 2005. Will the nanomedicine “patent land grab” thwart commercialization<br />
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 1, 346–350.<br />
Bekkers, R., West, J., 2009. The limits to IPR standardization policies as evidenced by strategic<br />
patenting in UMTS. Telecommunications Policy 33, 80–97.<br />
Berneman, L.P., Cockburn, I., Agrawal, A., Shankar, I., 2009. U.S./Canadian Licensing In 2007-<br />
08: Survey Results. les Nouvelles 1–8.<br />
Bessen, J. E., Meurer, M. J., 2012. The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes. Boston University<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-34. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.<br />
com/abstract=2091210<br />
Bessen, J., E., Meurer, M. J., 2008. <strong>Patent</strong> failure: how judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put<br />
innovators at risk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.<br />
Bessen, J., Hunt, R.M., 2007. An empirical look at s<strong>of</strong>tware patents. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics and<br />
Management Strategy 16, 157–189.<br />
Bessen, J., Maskin, E., 2007. Sequential Innovation, <strong>Patent</strong>s, and Imitation. RAND Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics 40, 611-635.<br />
Bessen, J., Meurer, M., Ford, J., 2011. The Private and Social Costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> Trolls. Boston,<br />
MA: Boston University School <strong>of</strong> Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-45.<br />
Blind, K., Bekkers, R., Dietrich, Y., Iversen, E., Köhler, F., Müller, B., Pohlmann, T., Smeets, S.,<br />
Verweijen, J., 2011. Study on the Interplay between Standards and <strong>Intellectual</strong> <strong>Property</strong> Rights
Change language