A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Thickets</strong> 63<br />
Farrell, J. and Merges, R. P. (2004). Incentives to Challenge and to Defend <strong>Patent</strong>s: Why<br />
Litigation Won’t Reliably Fix <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Office</strong> Errors and Why Administrative <strong>Patent</strong> Review Might<br />
Help, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19 (3), 943-970.<br />
Farrell, J., Shapiro, C., 2008. How strong are weak patents American Economic Review 98,<br />
1347–1369.<br />
Federal Trade Commission, 2003. To Promote Innovation - The Proper Balance <strong>of</strong> Competition<br />
and <strong>Patent</strong> Law and Policy. Washington, DC: GPO. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/reports/<br />
innovation/P040101PromotingInnovationandCompetitionrpt0704.pdf<br />
Federal Trade Commission, 2011. The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning <strong>Patent</strong> Notice and<br />
Remedies With Competition. Washington, DC. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/<br />
os/2011/03/110307patentreport.pdf<br />
Galasso, A., Schankerman, M., 2010. <strong>Patent</strong> thickets, courts, and the market for innovation.<br />
RAND Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics 41, 472–503.<br />
Graevenitz, von, G., Wagner, S., Harh<strong>of</strong>f, D., 2011. How to measure patent thickets—A novel<br />
approach. Economics Letters 111, 1–4.<br />
Graevenitz, von, G., Wagner, S., Harh<strong>of</strong>f, D., 2012. Incidence and Growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Thickets</strong>:<br />
The Impact <strong>of</strong> Technological Opportunities and Complexity. Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Economics,<br />
forthcoming.<br />
Graf, S. W., 2007. Improving patent quality through identification <strong>of</strong> relevant prior art: approaches<br />
to increase information flow to the patent <strong>of</strong>fice. Lewis & Clark Law Review 11, 495.<br />
Graham, S., Sichelman, T.M., 2008. Why do start-ups patent Berkeley Technology Law Journal<br />
23 (3), 1064 1097.<br />
Grindley, P. C., Teece, D. J., 1997. Managing <strong>Intellectual</strong> Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing<br />
in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review 39, 8–41.<br />
Hall, B. H., 2005. Exploring the <strong>Patent</strong> Explosion. Journal <strong>of</strong> Technology Transfer 30, 35–48.<br />
Hall, B. H., Harh<strong>of</strong>f, D., 2004. Post Grant Review Systems at the U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Office</strong> - Design<br />
Parameters and Expected Impact. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 19, 981–1015.<br />
Hall, B. H., Harh<strong>of</strong>f, D., 2012. Recent Research on the Economics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong>s. Annual Review <strong>of</strong><br />
Economics 4, 541-565.<br />
Hall, B. H., Helmers, C., Rogers, M., Sena, V., 2012. The importance (or not) <strong>of</strong> patents to <strong>UK</strong><br />
firms. Report to the <strong>UK</strong> IPO, 1–42.<br />
Hall, B. H., MacGarvie, M., 2010. The private value <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware patents. Research Policy 39,<br />
994–1009.
Change language