A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
66 A Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Thickets</strong><br />
Lei, Z., Wright, B., 2009. Why Weak <strong>Patent</strong>s Rational Ignorance or Pro-’Customer’ Tilt<br />
University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley. Available at http://purl.umn.edu/49279<br />
Lemley, M., 2005. <strong>Patent</strong>ing nanotechnology. Stanford Law Review 58, 601.<br />
Lemley, M., Shapiro, C., 2005. Probabilistic patents. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives 19,<br />
75–98.<br />
Lemley, M., Shapiro, C., 2007. <strong>Patent</strong> Holdup and Royalty Stacking. Texas Law Review 85:1991.<br />
Lerner, J., 2002. <strong>Patent</strong> Protection and Innovation over 150 Years. American Economic Review<br />
92(2), 221-225.<br />
Lerner, J., 2010. The Litigation <strong>of</strong> Financial Innovations. Journal <strong>of</strong> Law and Economics 53(4),<br />
807-831.<br />
McAfee, R. P., Mialon, H. M., Williams, M. A., 2004. What is a Barrier to Entry American<br />
Economic Review 94, 461–465.<br />
McDonough, J. F., 2006. The Myth <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Patent</strong> Troll: An Alternative View <strong>of</strong> the Function <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Patent</strong> Dealers in an Idea Economy, Emory Law Journal 56, 189.<br />
Meyer, M., 2000. <strong>Patent</strong> Citations in a Novel Field <strong>of</strong> Technology—What Can They Tell about<br />
Interactions between Emerging Communities <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology Scientometrics 48,<br />
151–178.<br />
Milo, R., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Levitt, R., Alon, U., 2004a. Response to Comment on”<br />
Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks <strong>of</strong> Complex Networks” and“ Superfamilies <strong>of</strong> Evolved<br />
and Designed Networks.” Science 305, 1107d.<br />
Milo, R., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Levitt, R., Shen-Orr, S., Ayzenshtat, I., Sheffer, M., Alon, U.,<br />
2004b. Superfamilies <strong>of</strong> evolved and designed networks. Science 303, 1538.<br />
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., Alon, U., 2002. Network Motifs:<br />
Simple Building Blocks <strong>of</strong> Complex Networks. Science 298, 824.<br />
Moser, P., 2005. How Do <strong>Patent</strong> Laws Influence Innovation Evidence from Nineteenth-Century<br />
World’s Fairs. American Economic Review 95(4), 1214-1236.<br />
Moss<strong>of</strong>f, A., 2009. A stitch in time: The rise and fall <strong>of</strong> the sewing machine patent thicket.<br />
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper.<br />
Moss<strong>of</strong>f, A., 2011. The Rise and Fall <strong>of</strong> the First American <strong>Patent</strong> Thicket: The Sewing Machine<br />
War <strong>of</strong> the 1850s. Arizona Law Review 53, 165.<br />
Myhrvold, N., 2010. The Big Idea: Funding Eureka!, Harvard Business Review (March), 40-50.
Change language