A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
A study of Patent Thickets (1.31Mb) - UK Intellectual Property Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Thickets</strong> 67<br />
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., Olivatro, D., 1997. The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology<br />
and Public Science. Research Policy 26, 317–330.<br />
Narin, F., Noma, E., 1985. Is Technology Becoming Science Scientometrics 7, 369–381.<br />
Neumark, D., Wall, B., Zhang, J., 2011. Do small businesses create more jobs New evidence<br />
for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review <strong>of</strong> Economics and<br />
Statistics 93, 16–29.<br />
Nicholas, T., 2011. Cheaper patents. Research Policy 40, 325–339.<br />
Noel, M., Schankerman, M., 2013. Strategic <strong>Patent</strong>ing and S<strong>of</strong>tware Innovation, forthcoming in<br />
the Journal <strong>of</strong> Industrial Economics. CEPR Discussion Paper 5701 (June 2006)<br />
Parchomovsky, G., Wagner, R. P., 2005. <strong>Patent</strong> portfolios. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Review 154,<br />
1.<br />
Pénin, J., Wack, J.-P., 2008. Research tool patents and free-libre biotechnology: A suggested<br />
unified framework. Research Policy 37, 1909–1921.<br />
Quillen, J. C. D., Webster, O. H., 2001. Continuing <strong>Patent</strong> Applications and Performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> <strong>Office</strong>. Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11.<br />
Quillen, J. C. D., Webster, O. H., 2009. Continuing patent applications and performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
US <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark <strong>Office</strong>-One more time. Federal Cicuit Bar Journal 18, 379.<br />
Quillen, J. C. D., Webster, O. H., Eichmann, R., 2003. Continuing <strong>Patent</strong> Applications and<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> the U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark <strong>Office</strong> - Extended. Federal Circuit Bar Journal<br />
12, 35–55.<br />
Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., Heath, C., 2007. On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic<br />
damage awards and firms’ strategies <strong>of</strong> “being infringed.” Research Policy 36, 134–154.<br />
Risch, M., 2012. <strong>Patent</strong> Troll Myths. Seton Hall Law Review.<br />
Rubinfeld, D., Maness, R., 2004. The strategic use <strong>of</strong> patents: Implications for antitrust. Antitrust,<br />
<strong>Patent</strong> and Copyright Conference.<br />
Schmalensee, R., 2004. Sunk Costs and Antitrust Barriers to Entry. American Economic Review<br />
94, 471–475.<br />
Schmoch, U., 2009. Document IPC/CE/41/5, Annex, Conception <strong>of</strong> a Technology Classification<br />
for Country Comparisons, 41th session <strong>of</strong> the IPC Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts. 1–15.<br />
Shapiro, C., 2000. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard<br />
setting. Innovation Policy and the Economy 119–150.
Change language