here - Atomic Energy Regulatory Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RRS RS RSO RTI RUP RV SA SARCAR SARCOP SBO SC SC SC SCALE SEC SER SG SM SS SSE SCURF SEE SER SFSB SG SG : Reactor Regulating System : Remote Sensing : Radiological Safety Officer : Right to Information : Reprocessed Uranium Oxide Plant : Reactor Vault : Sub Assembly : Safety Review Committee for Applications of Radiation : Safety Review Committee for Operating Plants : Station Black Out : Safety Code : Safety Committee : Secondary Containment : Standard Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation : Site Evaluation Committee : Site Evaluation Report : Safety Guide : Safety Manual : Standards Specifications : Safe Shutdown Earthquake : Standing Committee for Investigation of Unusual Occurrences in Radiation Facilities : Site Emergency Exercise : Significant Event Report : Spent Fuel Storage Bay : Steam Generator : Specialists Group SGDHRS SMART SPE SPND SRI SS SSE S.R SSS SSSB SV TAPS TAPP TDP TF TMI Type B (U) USC UCIL USNRC VECC V & V VVER WG WMP ZCP ZSP : Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System : System Integrated Modular Advanced Reactor : Standard Problem Exercise : Self Powered Neutron Detector : Safety Research Institute : Stainless Steel : Safe Shutdown Earthquake : Severity Rate : Secondary Shut down System : Spent Subassembly Storage Bay : Safety Vessel : Tarapur Atomic Power Station : Tarapur Atomic Power Project : Technology Demonstration Plant : Task Force : Three Mile Island : Type B (Unilateral) : Unit Safety Committee : Uranium Corporation of India Limited : United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission : Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre : Verification and Validation : Water Water Energy Reactor : Working Group : Waste Management Plant : Zirconium Complex Project : Zirconium Sponge Plant 78
INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR EVENT SCALE (INES) Level/ Descriptor Nature of the Events Examples 7 • Major release: Widespread health and Chernobyl NPP, USSR MAJOR ACCIDENT environmental effects (now in Ukraine), 1986 6 • Significant release: Likely to require full Kyshtym Reprocessing Plant, USSR SERIOUS ACCIDENT implementation of planned counter measures (now in Russia), 1957 5 • Limited release: Likely to require partial Windscale Pile, UK, 1957 ACCIDENT WITH implementation of planned counter measures OFF-SITE RISK • Severe damage to reactor core/ Three Mile Island, NPP, USA, 1979 radiological barriers 4 • Minor release: public exposure of the order Windscale Reprocessing ACCIDENT WITHOUT of prescribed limits Plant, UK, 1973 SIGNIFICANT • Significant damage to reactor core/radiological Saint-Laurent NPP, France, 1980 OFF-SITE RISK barriers/ fatal exposure of a worker Buenos Aires Critical Assembly, Argentina, 1983 3 • Very small release: public exposure at a Vandellos NPP, Spain, 1989 SERIOUS INCIDENT fraction of prescribed limits • Severe spread of contamination/ acute health effects to a worker • Near accident, no safety layers remaining 2 • Significant spread of contamination/ over INCIDENT exposure of a worker • Incidents with significant failures in safety provisions 1 • Anomaly beyond the authorized ANOMALY operating regime 0 DEVIATIONS BELOW SCALE No safety significance 79
Page 2 and 3:
ATOMIC ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD The
Page 4 and 5:
THE FUNCTIONS OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY
Page 6 and 7:
3.2.2 Shipments Approved 27 3.2.3 R
Page 8 and 9:
CHAPTER 10 PUBLIC INFORMATION 61 10
Page 10 and 11:
INDEX TO FIGURES Figure Title Page
Page 12 and 13:
1.2 ORGANISATION CHART OF AERB ATOM
Page 14 and 15:
Mumbai. For Uranium Corporation of
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 2 SAFETY SURVEILLANCE OF NU
Page 18 and 19:
out and clearances were issued in s
Page 20 and 21:
● ● ● PFBR related pipe trenc
Page 22 and 23:
Some of the important observations/
Page 24 and 25:
● ● PFBR ● ● DFRP ● ● T
Page 26 and 27:
Load Capacity (ULC) of the Inner Co
Page 28 and 29:
2.2.9 Licensing of Operating Staff
Page 30 and 31:
to explore the possibility of repla
Page 32 and 33:
● ● ● ● ● ● ● Cause f
Page 34 and 35:
CHAPTER 3 SAFETY SURVEILLANCE OF RA
Page 36 and 37:
Table-3.4: Licences / NOC Issued A.
Page 38 and 39: for the loading/ replenishment of C
Page 40 and 41: gauge device. The device has adequa
Page 42 and 43: In order to enhance industrial safe
Page 44 and 45: ● ● ● ● ● ● Individual
Page 46 and 47: Fig 4.2: Distribution of Man-days L
Page 48 and 49: CHAPTER 5 ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND
Page 50: - - - Note: Limits for release of A
Page 53 and 54: 5.3 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 7 DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY DOC
Page 57 and 58: Part-2 of the Analysis: The mass of
Page 59 and 60: provisions of AERB safety standard
Page 61 and 62: 8.2 SAFETY REVIEW OF NUCLEAR POWER
Page 63 and 64: inventory. A report on the above an
Page 65 and 66: Fig. 9.2: Aerial Extents of Water B
Page 67 and 68: Fig. 9.5: Subsurface Characterizati
Page 69 and 70: Fig. 9.7: Ground Water Classificati
Page 71 and 72: CHAPTER 10 PUBLIC INFORMATION 10.1
Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 11 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIO
Page 75 and 76: Inauguration of INSAG Meeting in Pr
Page 77 and 78: 12.5 AERB COLLOQUIA l l l l Followi
Page 79 and 80: Table 13.2: Research Projects Renew
Page 81 and 82: l l l Compliance Assurance for the
Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 15 GENERAL 15.1 IMPLEMENTAT
Page 85 and 86: l l l l l l l l S.K.Pradhan, R.S.Ra
Page 87: IGRPP IHX ILRT INES IPN IREL IRMRA
show all

here - Atomic Energy Regulatory Board

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?