18.01.2015 Views

SKAGIT COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - Skagit River History

SKAGIT COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - Skagit River History

SKAGIT COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - Skagit River History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SKAGIT</strong> <strong>COUNTY</strong> <strong>PROSECUTING</strong> <strong>ATTORNEY</strong><br />

RICHARD A. WEYRICH<br />

CRIMINAL DIVISION<br />

CHIEF CRIMINAL DEPUTY<br />

ROSEMARY KAHOLOI(ULA<br />

SENIOR CRIMINAL DEPUTIES<br />

ERIf< PEDERSEN<br />

TRISHA D. JOHNSON<br />

EDWIN N. NORTON<br />

CRJMINAL DEPUTIES<br />

ERIN C, DYER<br />

SLOAN G. JOHNSON<br />

KAREN L. PINNELL<br />

MELISSA W. SULLIVAN<br />

PAUL W. NIELSEN<br />

Russ BROWN<br />

MELANIE STUM<br />

605 S. THIRD<br />

MOUNT VERNON, W A 98273<br />

PHONE (360) 336-9460<br />

FAX (360) 336-9347<br />

CIVIL DIVISION<br />

CHIEF CIVIL DEPUTY<br />

WILLIAM W. HONEA<br />

CIVIL DEPUTIES<br />

MELINDA B. MILLER<br />

ARNE O. D ENNY<br />

STEPHEN R. FALLQUIST<br />

JILL OLSON<br />

RYAN WALTERS<br />

FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION<br />

CHIEF FAMILY SUPPORT DEPUTY<br />

KURT E. HEFFERLINE<br />

SENIOR FAM ILY SUPPORT DEPUTY<br />

GWEN L. HALLIDA Y<br />

December 22, 2010<br />

Mr. Kevin Rogerson<br />

City of Mount Vernon<br />

PO Box 809<br />

Mount Vernon, WA 98273<br />

Mr. Scott Thomas<br />

City of Burlington<br />

833 South Spruce Street<br />

Burlington, WA 98233<br />

Mr. John Schultz<br />

Dike District Nos. 1 & 12<br />

160 Cascade Place, Suite 211<br />

Burlington, WA 98233<br />

Mr. Scott Shapiro<br />

Downey Brand LLP<br />

621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor<br />

Sacramento, CA 95814<br />

Gentlemen,<br />

RE: FEMA Map Appeal<br />

It is our understanding that FEMA plans to initiate the appeal period for the new <strong>Skagit</strong> Basin<br />

FIRM maps in the near future. In our September 2010 meeting with the mayors and commissioners,<br />

we discussed that you would be providing the County with a proposed appeal plan. The idea was<br />

that this would allow the County to contemplate financial participation in the cities' appeal.<br />

We have received a public document in the past few days that contains few details, but have<br />

otherwise not been invited to participate in formulating an appeal plan. It is our understanding that<br />

the cities' appeal plan has generally been cloaked in secrecy - for example, Burlington city council<br />

members were allowed to see but not keep a copy of the appeal plan .<br />

As the Board of Commissioners made clear during our September meeting, the County must<br />

be involved in the front-end planning of the appeal on an open and transparent basis if the County is<br />

to financially participate in an appeal. Nevertheless, at this point we have literally no idea what the<br />

cities plan to appeal, what technical information will form the basis for the appeal, nor what legal<br />

Family Support Location Information:<br />

PO Box 1226, 1204 Cleveland Street,<br />

Mount Vemon, WA 98273<br />

PH (360) 336-9461 FAX (360) 336-9393<br />

Civil Location Information:<br />

<strong>Skagit</strong> County Courthouse<br />

Courthouse Room 302<br />

PH: (360) 336-9460 FAX: (360) 336-9497


FEMA Flood Appeal December 22,2010<br />

theories will be asserted - and so forth. Once the appeal is filed, the opportunity to participate in<br />

forming the appeal plan will be foreclosed.<br />

We understand that the cities have collectively allocated $150,000 for the appeal. In our<br />

experience, the amount of time and money involved in battles of this nature seldom if ever stay<br />

within the bounds of pre-conflict predictions.<br />

For example, few County officials in office in 1995 would have predicted that the dispute over<br />

farmland fish buffers would involve paying Seattle law firms more than $5,000,000 over the course of<br />

a decade. And few in 2001 foresaw that many more millions would be paid to outside law firms to<br />

pursue water rights litigation in the <strong>Skagit</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin. Speaking from substantial experience,<br />

outside counsel is easy to hire and complex disputes are easy to start, but the costs are exceedingly<br />

hard to control once started. With this mind, given the likely costs of this endeavor and the extensive<br />

efforts already funded by the County that have reduced the base flood elevation, we believe it<br />

important that the community proceed with a plan that is likely to accomplish clearly defined<br />

objectives.<br />

We presume it is not the cities' intention to initiate an appeal without the County's input and<br />

then later seek the County's financial participation. Given the cities' budgetary constraints and<br />

comments by Mayor Norris during our September 2010 meeting, it seems a virtual certainty that the<br />

cities will be asking <strong>Skagit</strong> County to financially participate in the cities' appeal effort in the not too<br />

distant future. While we continue to have grave concerns about a technical appeal based on Pacific<br />

International Engineering's (PIE) work product, it is even more important that all jurisdictions in the<br />

<strong>Skagit</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin work on a coordinated basis in dealing with the new FIRM maps.<br />

The new FIRM maps have been published in their final form, the technical information<br />

underlying them is publically available, the cities' technical criticisms are well-known, and the appeal<br />

period will start in a matter of days. With this in mind, it is difficult to comprehend the reason for the<br />

extensive secrecy in which the cities' appeal plans have thus far been shrouded. From our<br />

perspective, any perceived need for secrecy is considerably outweighed by the need to justify the<br />

extremely large and highly unpredictable expenditure that local government is on the verge of<br />

undertaking. The new FIRM maps may well have intolerable impacts, but proceeding precipitously<br />

will only add insult to injury.<br />

With the foregoing in mind, we invite a more open discussion about the cities' plans to appeal<br />

the FIRM maps if the County is to be later asked to financially participate in the appeal.<br />

Will Honea<br />

Chief Civil Deputy<br />

cc:<br />

Richard Weyrich<br />

Board of Commissioners<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!