21.01.2015 Views

MEDICAL DEVICE INNOVATION - Medical Device Daily

MEDICAL DEVICE INNOVATION - Medical Device Daily

MEDICAL DEVICE INNOVATION - Medical Device Daily

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>MEDICAL</strong> <strong>DEVICE</strong> <strong>INNOVATION</strong> 2010<br />

Transplant medicine advances<br />

from a cooler of ice to LifePort<br />

By LYNN YOFFEE<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Device</strong> <strong>Daily</strong> Staff Writer<br />

Just as the new year begins, researchers have pushed<br />

open a massive door in the field of organ transplantation<br />

medicine that will offer expanded opportunities for more<br />

transplants with far better outcomes.<br />

A machine developed by Organ Recovery Systems<br />

(ORS; Chicago) that stores kidneys for transplant has been<br />

proven in a landmark study indicating an ability to vastly<br />

improve the survival and function of organs. This compares<br />

to the most common, and rudimentary, transport<br />

method currently available: a bag of ice in a cooler – or<br />

essentially the kind of treatment normally offered the standard<br />

six-pack of beer.<br />

The ORS technology has promising applications for<br />

liver, heart, pancreas and lung transplants too, according to<br />

the company.<br />

“Organ transplantation medicine has finally reached<br />

the 21st century,” David Kravitz, CEO of ORS told <strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Device</strong> <strong>Daily</strong>.<br />

So notable is this technology advance – an egg-shaped,<br />

20-pound device that’s about the size of a carry-on suitcase<br />

– that it has been added to the permanent collection of New<br />

York’s Museum of Modern Art.<br />

“We made it iconic-looking to make a statement in<br />

terms of the physicality of it – to set it apart from the box of<br />

ice,” Kravitz said. “But it’s built to be rugged because we<br />

knew it had to go as robustly anywhere that a box of ice<br />

would go, including being unattended in the cargo hold of<br />

an airplane.”<br />

The company’s LifePort Kidney Transporter was FDAapproved<br />

in 2003, but when ORS first received that<br />

approval, it didn’t have the financial guns to run a pivotal<br />

trial.<br />

Thus, the system has been used only on a pilot, introductory<br />

basis, to date.<br />

But a study published in the current issue of the New<br />

England Journal of Medicine now proves that use of the<br />

LifePort, which preserves a kidney by continuously pumping<br />

a temperature-controlled nutrient solution through the<br />

organ and monitors performance in real time, offers significant<br />

benefits in organ survival and function compared to<br />

those that are moved from donor to patient in an iced cooler.<br />

The international trial reported in the NEJM enrolled<br />

kidney pairs from 336 deceased donors in Europe and randomly<br />

assigned one kidney to machine perfusion and the<br />

other to static (ice) storage. Results showed that the odds<br />

of a delay in kidney function post-transplant were reduced<br />

by almost half when machine perfusion was used compared<br />

with static cold storage.<br />

99<br />

The study is considered a landmark because it’s the<br />

first randomized, prospective study to compare the two<br />

methods of storing and transporting organs.<br />

“We needed to set the story straight on the differences<br />

between our machine and bags of ice,” Kravitz said.<br />

Comparing the progress and development of the system<br />

to making a “movie,” he said it was shot “out of<br />

sequence, but it was really an artifact of funding. In this<br />

study, the investigators were trying to answer an age-old<br />

question in renal transplantation: does a machine improve<br />

the outcome of a transplant vs. a box of ice”<br />

Delay in function is a relatively common complication<br />

that affects the long-term outcome of kidney transplants.<br />

The study also proved that the LifePort kidneys were 48%<br />

less likely to fail within the first year, post-transplant, compared<br />

to those kidneys stored in the traditional box of ice<br />

prior to transplantation.<br />

“Delayed graft function is a term that defines a posttransplant<br />

episode where the kidney doesn’t immediately<br />

function and the patient must be dialyzed,” Kravitz said.<br />

“It’s painful, causes complications and involves longer hospital<br />

stays.”<br />

In the early days of transplantation medicine, the ideal<br />

donor was the young motorcycle accident victim, with a<br />

closed-head injury, whose organs were all healthy and<br />

intact, Kravitz explained. Older donors and those who<br />

weren’t as healthy weren’t even considered because of the<br />

possibility that their organs wouldn’t survive or wouldn’t<br />

perform well.<br />

“Over time, the donor community has grown, demand<br />

has grown dramatically, and the average donor has a<br />

broader definition of secondary medical conditions and<br />

age that can be considered,” Kravitz said.<br />

More than 1.5 million people worldwide suffer from<br />

end-stage renal disease, for which a kidney transplant is<br />

the best treatment option. The National Kidney Foundation<br />

(NKF; New York) reports that the number of those waiting<br />

for a transplant has passed 100,000.<br />

“Any new method like the one demonstrated in this<br />

study, that will help maximize the available organs and<br />

potentially reduce the need for re-transplantation, is vitally<br />

important for patients and the professionals who care for<br />

them,” said Joseph Vassalotti, MD, chief medical officer of<br />

NKF.<br />

Beyond kidneys, LifePort is considered to be a platform<br />

technology.<br />

“It was designed to be extended to other organ types<br />

without changing a whole lot,” Kravitz said. “We have latestage<br />

prototypes that have been evaluated in large mammal<br />

models. We’re considering in 2009 how to move them<br />

forward.”<br />

Although an exact commercial pricing model hasn’t yet<br />

been established, he estimated the cost of the base hardware<br />

at $15,000 to $20,000 per unit. Machine life expectancy<br />

is unknown, although the units that have been in pilot<br />

To subscribe, please call <strong>MEDICAL</strong> <strong>DEVICE</strong> DAILY Customer Service at (800) 888-3912; outside the U.S. and Canada, call (404) 262-5547.<br />

Copyright © 2010 AHC Media LLC. Reproduction is strictly prohibited.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!